A Multicenter Trial of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Heart Surgery
This multicenter, randomized, controlled trial involving adults undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass while under propofol anesthesia compared upper-limb remote ischemic preconditioning with a sham intervention. No relevant benefit was observed. Cardiac surgery is associate...
Saved in:
Published in | The New England journal of medicine Vol. 373; no. 15; pp. 1397 - 1407 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Massachusetts Medical Society
08.10.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This multicenter, randomized, controlled trial involving adults undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass while under propofol anesthesia compared upper-limb remote ischemic preconditioning with a sham intervention. No relevant benefit was observed.
Cardiac surgery is associated with a predictable risk of end-organ ischemic and reperfusion injury. Transient ischemia of nonvital tissue, known as remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC), is reported to help remote vital organs withstand a subsequent prolonged ischemic event.
1
Although proof-of-concept trials suggested that RIPC provides protection against myocardial and kidney injury, as determined by serum cardiac and renal biomarkers, in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery,
2
–
4
more recent studies failed to show significant differences between the RIPC and control groups with respect to troponin release, inotropic or vasoconstrictor support, renal dysfunction, and lung injury.
5
–
10
Only a few studies have included . . . |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-2 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMoa1413579 |