Changing the default setting for information privacy protection: What and whose personal information can be better protected?

• Published in: The Social science journal (Fort Collins) Vol. 51; no. 4; pp. 523 - 533
• Main Authors: Baek, Young Min, Bae, Young, Jeong, Irkwon, Kim, Eunmee, Rhee, June Woong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Fort Collins Elsevier Inc 01.12.2014; Taylor & Francis; Elsevier Science Ltd
• Subjects: Framing; Framing effect; Individuals; Industrialized countries; Information; Information privacy; Infringement; Internet security; Internet service providers; Loss aversion; Notice-and-consent requirement; Personal information; Privacy; Privacy protection; Status quo bias; Information privacy; Framing effect; Notice-and-consent requirement; Status quo bias; Loss aversion
• DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2014.07.002
• ISSN: 0362-3319

•We examine whether the frame of consent forms influences information privacy.•The opt-in frame protects information privacy better than the opt-out frame.•The framing effect is stronger when the information concerns online activities.•The framing effect is stronger among people with weakly held privacy attitudes.•The framing effect is stronger among people with no privacy infringement experience. With Internet service providers (ISPs) increasingly demanding personal information to develop personalized services, people have become more vulnerable to privacy infringement. As a way to protect individuals’ privacy, industrialized countries have implemented a “notice-and-consent” requirement, meaning an ISP must obtain users’ consent to collect personal information in the course of the ISP's business. Drawing on prospect theory and earlier work on information privacy and behavioral science, in this study, we administered an online survey experiment to test whether the giving of consent differs between ‘opt-in’ and ‘opt-out’ frames. The framing effect was found to be moderated by personal information type, people's attitudes toward privacy, and people's privacy infringement experience. The results indicate that the opt-in frame better protects users’ information privacy, and the framing effect is magnified when the targeted information concerns online activities, when users have weakly held privacy attitudes, and when users have less experience of privacy infringement.