Patterns and predictors of change in outcome measures in clinical trials in scleroderma: An individual patient meta-analysis of 629 subjects with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis

Objective To examine the range and responsiveness to change of clinical outcome measures and study predictors of clinical response in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) in the context of clinical trials. Methods Data were combined from 629 patients with dcSSc who participated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) Vol. 64; no. 10; pp. 3420 - 3429
Main Authors Merkel, P. A., Silliman, N. P., Clements, P. J., Denton, C. P., Furst, D. E., Mayes, M. D., Pope, J. E., Polisson, R. P., Streisand, J. B., Seibold, J. R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.10.2012
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective To examine the range and responsiveness to change of clinical outcome measures and study predictors of clinical response in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) in the context of clinical trials. Methods Data were combined from 629 patients with dcSSc who participated in 7 multicenter clinical therapeutic trials. Trials used common outcome measures: modified Rodnan skin thickness score (MRSS), Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ DI), patient's global assessment of disease activity, pulmonary function tests (forced vital capacity, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide), hand span, and oral aperture. Results The combined database included 629 patients (82% women, mean ± SD age 46.5 ± 11.8 years, mean ± SD disease duration 19.4 ± 15.9 months). Outcomes tended to improve during trials for patients with more severe disease at study entry and to worsen for patients with less severe disease at entry. Disease duration was mildly negatively predictive of change in MRSS at 6 months (r = –0.27, P < 0.001), and substantial bidirectional variation in change in MRSS and HAQ DI score was seen across the spectrum of disease duration. Sixty‐three percent of patients with “early” disease (disease duration <18 months) had a decline in MRSS, and 37% had an increase in MRSS. Eighty‐one percent of patients with “late” disease (disease duration ≥18 months) had a decline in MRSS, and 19% had an increase in MRSS. Multivariate mixed models did not demonstrate that any baseline variables were strongly predictive of subsequent outcome. Conclusion Among patients with dcSSc enrolled in clinical trials, standard outcome measures tend to improve in those with more severe disease at study entry and to worsen in those with less severe disease at entry. Overall, the MRSS improves during trials, while HAQ DI scores and lung function are mostly static. None of these variables, including disease duration, reliably identifies groups of subjects whose MRSS will predictably increase or decrease in the course of a clinical trial. These findings have important implications for clinical trial design in scleroderma.
Bibliography:Jonathan and Lisa Rye
ArticleID:ART34427
NIH (National Center for Research Resources, General Clinical Research Centers program at Boston University) - No. M01-RRO-00533
NIH (National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases)
Mid-Career Clinical Investigator Award - No. K24-AR-2224-01A1
istex:3448FE16FA42F831866D93AE7422C85A60F3673B
ark:/67375/WNG-5WZS9WNW-5
Genzyme
Scleroderma Foundation
Marvin and Betty Danto Scleroderma Research Endowments to the University of Michigan
Dr. Mayes has received consulting and/or speaking fees from Actelion and Gilead (less than $10,000 each); she has received research grants from MedImmune, Actelion, and United Therapeutics.
Drs. Silliman, Polisson, and Streisand own stock or stock options in Genzyme.
Dr. Seibold has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from Sanofi‐Aventis, Actelion, Celgene, and MedImmune (less than $10,000 each) and from Pfizer, United Therapeutics, and NexMed (more than $10,000 each); he has received research grants from Genzyme and Connetics.
Dr. Merkel has received consulting fees from Actelion (less than $10,000); he has received research grants from Actelion, Celgene, Connetics (now part of Stiefel, a GlaxoSmithKline company), Genentech, and Genzyme.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0004-3591
2326-5191
1529-0131
1529-0131
2326-5205
DOI:10.1002/art.34427