Comparison of [18 F]fluorocholine and [18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose for positron emission tomography of androgen dependent and androgen independent prostate cancer

Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is used for the metabolic evaluation of cancer. [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is commonly used as a radiotracer but its low cellular uptake rate in prostate cancer limits its usefulness. We evaluated the novel choline analog [18F]fluorocholine (FCH) for det...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of urology Vol. 168; no. 1; p. 273
Main Authors Price, David T, Coleman, R Edward, Liao, Ray P, Robertson, Cary N, Polascik, Thomas J, DeGrado, Timothy R
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 2002
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is used for the metabolic evaluation of cancer. [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is commonly used as a radiotracer but its low cellular uptake rate in prostate cancer limits its usefulness. We evaluated the novel choline analog [18F]fluorocholine (FCH) for detecting androgen dependent and androgen independent prostate cancer, and its metastases. The cellular uptake of FCH and FDG was compared in cultured prostate cancer cells (LNCaP and PC-3). FCH and FDG were injected into nude mice xenografts (CWR-22 and PC-3) and radiotracer uptake in various organs were evaluated. Patients with androgen dependent (9) and independent (9) prostate cancer were studied by FCH and FDG PET. FCH uptake was 849% and 60% greater than FDG uptake in androgen dependent (LNCaP) and independent (PC-3) cells, respectively. The addition of hemicholinium-3 (5 mM.) 30 minutes before radiotracer administration inhibited FCH uptake by 79% and 70% in LNCaP and PC-3 cells, respectively, whereas FDG uptake was not significantly affected. Although nude mice xenografts showed that FDG uptake was equal to or greater than FCH uptake, clinical imaging in patients demonstrated 2 to 4-fold higher uptake of FCH in those with androgen and androgen independent prostate carcinoma (p <0.001). More lesions were detected by FCH than by FDG in primary tumors, osseous metastases and soft tissue metastases. In vitro data demonstrated greater FCH than FDG uptake in androgen dependent (LNCaP) and androgen independent (PC-3) prostate cancer cells. Although the murine xenograft data showed greater accumulation of FDG than FCH in PC-3 tumors, PET in humans showed that FCH was better than FDG for detecting primary and metastatic prostate cancer. Overall the data from this study suggest that FCH is preferable to FDG for PET of prostate carcinoma and support the need for future validation studies in a larger number of subjects.
AbstractList Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is used for the metabolic evaluation of cancer. [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is commonly used as a radiotracer but its low cellular uptake rate in prostate cancer limits its usefulness. We evaluated the novel choline analog [18F]fluorocholine (FCH) for detecting androgen dependent and androgen independent prostate cancer, and its metastases. The cellular uptake of FCH and FDG was compared in cultured prostate cancer cells (LNCaP and PC-3). FCH and FDG were injected into nude mice xenografts (CWR-22 and PC-3) and radiotracer uptake in various organs were evaluated. Patients with androgen dependent (9) and independent (9) prostate cancer were studied by FCH and FDG PET. FCH uptake was 849% and 60% greater than FDG uptake in androgen dependent (LNCaP) and independent (PC-3) cells, respectively. The addition of hemicholinium-3 (5 mM.) 30 minutes before radiotracer administration inhibited FCH uptake by 79% and 70% in LNCaP and PC-3 cells, respectively, whereas FDG uptake was not significantly affected. Although nude mice xenografts showed that FDG uptake was equal to or greater than FCH uptake, clinical imaging in patients demonstrated 2 to 4-fold higher uptake of FCH in those with androgen and androgen independent prostate carcinoma (p <0.001). More lesions were detected by FCH than by FDG in primary tumors, osseous metastases and soft tissue metastases. In vitro data demonstrated greater FCH than FDG uptake in androgen dependent (LNCaP) and androgen independent (PC-3) prostate cancer cells. Although the murine xenograft data showed greater accumulation of FDG than FCH in PC-3 tumors, PET in humans showed that FCH was better than FDG for detecting primary and metastatic prostate cancer. Overall the data from this study suggest that FCH is preferable to FDG for PET of prostate carcinoma and support the need for future validation studies in a larger number of subjects.
Author Robertson, Cary N
Liao, Ray P
Coleman, R Edward
DeGrado, Timothy R
Polascik, Thomas J
Price, David T
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: David T
  surname: Price
  fullname: Price, David T
  organization: Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: R Edward
  surname: Coleman
  fullname: Coleman, R Edward
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ray P
  surname: Liao
  fullname: Liao, Ray P
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Cary N
  surname: Robertson
  fullname: Robertson, Cary N
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Thomas J
  surname: Polascik
  fullname: Polascik, Thomas J
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Timothy R
  surname: DeGrado
  fullname: DeGrado, Timothy R
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12050555$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpVkMtKAzEYhbOo2Is-gpKlLkaTTDKXpRSrQsGNrkRKJvnTjszkH5Ip2JfxWTveKq7O4TvwLc6UjDx6IOSMsyvOeHYdGRMiUanML5i6zGTJsiQdkckBj8k0xjfGuFS5OCZjLphiSqkJ-Zhj2-lQR_QUHX3hBV28umaLAc0Gm9oD1d7-4xbwfbdutgYjUIeBdhjrPgwCaOsY66H02OI66G6z-5QOgoBr8NRCB96C77-cB1z7v6ELGHvdAzXaGwgn5MjpJsLpT87I8-L2aX6fLB_vHuY3y8RIpfqksqkrq0KBAsnKUhZ5Cia1JSjLC1HqXFa5k8Y4rYfDKl45kC6T2kDpoJCpmJHzb2-3rVqwqy7UrQ671e9RYg9HnXCz
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1177_107327480200900408
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2009_07_1689
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_107_048231
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinimag_2015_12_010
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00120_004_0714_3
crossref_primary_10_1097_MNM_0000000000000665
crossref_primary_10_1162_15353500200505118
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nucmedbio_2020_03_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2020_09_025
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_crad_2018_03_018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eururo_2007_01_061
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2006_07_092
crossref_primary_10_1158_1078_0432_CCR_05_0249
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1078_1439_03_00061_9
crossref_primary_10_1093_rpd_ncw033
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_013_2358_2
crossref_primary_10_4111_kju_2011_52_2_79
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1742_4658_2012_08644_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11307_016_1020_3
crossref_primary_10_1158_1078_0432_CCR_07_1517
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_010_1579_x
crossref_primary_10_1158_1078_0432_CCR_07_0264
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_110_077941
crossref_primary_10_3834_uij_1944_5784_2013_12_01
crossref_primary_10_1097_MNM_0000000000000040
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_008_0781_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_015_3015_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nucmedbio_2021_03_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcl_2004_08_012
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11307_015_0901_1
crossref_primary_10_1038_nrc882
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0094_0143_03_00051_X
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_plipres_2013_08_005
crossref_primary_10_1097_RLU_0b013e318229208c
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mednuc_2012_04_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nucmedbio_2007_09_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ymeth_2009_03_021
crossref_primary_10_2310_7290_2012_00004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nucmedbio_2010_07_011
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1754_9485_2010_02178_x
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semnuclmed_2004_06_004
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_009_1091_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11307_009_0216_1
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_09_2579
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_009_1253_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10269_013_2322_6
crossref_primary_10_1590_S1516_89132008000700012
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_017_15928_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tcb_2014_06_001
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40169_016_0082_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11307_006_0039_2
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semnuclmed_2003_09_007
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11307_014_0782_8
crossref_primary_10_1097_MNM_0b013e328355990f
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mednuc_2008_06_003
crossref_primary_10_1097_RLU_0000000000000562
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mednuc_2009_01_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mednuc_2014_07_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuroe_2017_04_002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_007_0552_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_010_1493_2
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_113_135194
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semnuclmed_2012_03_002
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_113_123380
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_011_1920_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canrad_2010_12_005
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11934_003_0048_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mednuc_2011_04_007
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1464_410X_2007_06772_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocel_2010_07_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nucmedbio_2009_01_004
crossref_primary_10_2310_7290_2008_00018
crossref_primary_10_1097_RLU_0000000000003869
crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_2006_10_3218
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11307_005_0023_2
crossref_primary_10_1093_rpd_ncq024
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_006_0163_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13139_014_0314_0
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1752_8062_2011_00375_x
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0048430
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11307_009_0283_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2008_11_023
crossref_primary_10_5402_2011_219064
crossref_primary_10_1158_0008_5472_CAN_09_1419
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_purol_2014_12_002
crossref_primary_10_1172_JCI76029
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_revmed_2011_10_403
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_013_2398_7
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semnuclmed_2005_09_001
crossref_primary_10_1097_RLU_0000000000002526
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00120_006_1088_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40336_020_00378_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mednuc_2009_05_002
crossref_primary_10_1089_cbr_2008_0554
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mednuc_2011_05_010
crossref_primary_10_1097_00130404_200407000_00001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuro_2016_09_015
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semnuclmed_2007_07_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbalip_2013_03_010
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_011_0687_y
crossref_primary_10_1002_pros_22885
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_011_1775_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_007_0686_9
crossref_primary_10_1038_pcan_2011_35
crossref_primary_10_2174_0929867330666230607104441
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apradiso_2016_07_021
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semnuclmed_2011_02_002
crossref_primary_10_3413_Nukmed_0521_12_07
crossref_primary_10_3109_0284186X_2014_934398
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbcan_2006_10_002
crossref_primary_10_2165_00063030_200317050_00004
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_10182
crossref_primary_10_1186_1477_7819_2_30
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1166_7087_13_70048_4
crossref_primary_10_1097_RLU_0b013e31827a2294
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_017_3700_x
crossref_primary_10_1038_onc_2017_216
crossref_primary_10_1186_2191_219X_1_17
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13215360
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bmc_2004_03_051
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1617_0830_2010_01141_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nucmedbio_2006_08_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2010_04_084
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_115_169177
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_015_3042_5
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13550_017_0269_0
crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_2005_03_1575
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12149_009_0273_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_006_0150_2
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_114_148007
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1052_5149_03_00093_5
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2452061117
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_008_0736_y
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_014_2984_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lpm_2007_02_030
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_12_8816
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_76389842
crossref_primary_10_1177_1933719117728799
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eururo_2013_04_019
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11307_014_0803_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nucmedbio_2004_05_002
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_25384
crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_2558
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_004_1713_8
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1442_2042_2006_01416_x
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_05_0437
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
DOI 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)64906-3
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
ExternalDocumentID 12050555
Genre Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NHLBI NIH HHS
  grantid: HL-63371
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.55
.GJ
.XZ
08P
0R~
123
1B1
1CY
354
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
4Q1
4Q2
4Q3
53G
5RE
5VS
7-5
AAAAV
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAJCS
AAKAS
AALRI
AAMOA
AAQFI
AAQKA
AAQQT
AAQXK
AASCR
AASXQ
AAXUO
ABASU
ABCQX
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABOCM
ABPPZ
ABVCZ
ABWVN
ACGFS
ACIJW
ACILI
ACLDA
ACOAL
ACRPL
ACXJB
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADMUD
ADNKB
ADNMO
ADPAM
ADZCM
AEBDS
AEETU
AENEX
AFDTB
AFEXH
AFFNX
AFTRI
AFUWQ
AGHFR
AHOMT
AHQNM
AHRYX
AHVBC
AI.
AINUH
AITUG
AIZYK
AJCLO
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJZMW
AKCTQ
AKULP
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AMRAJ
ASGHL
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BCGUY
BELOY
BYPQX
C45
C5W
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIWNM
DU5
EBS
ECM
EEVPB
EIF
EJD
ERAAH
EX3
F5P
FCALG
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
GBLVA
GNXGY
GQDEL
HLJTE
HVGLF
HZ~
H~9
IH2
IHE
IKREB
IKYAY
IPNFZ
J5H
KMI
L7B
M41
MJL
MO0
N4W
NPM
NQ-
NTWIH
O9-
OAG
OAH
OB3
OBH
ODMTH
OGROG
OHH
OL1
OVD
OWU
OWV
OWW
OWY
OWZ
P2P
PKN
QTD
R2-
RIG
RLZ
ROL
RPZ
SEL
SES
SJN
SSZ
TEORI
TSPGW
UDS
UNMZH
UV1
VH1
VVN
WOW
X7M
XH2
XYM
YFH
YOC
ZCG
ZFV
ZGI
ZXP
ZY1
ZZMQN
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-bd3f9b85e5e40994873ec3d9e5d1829a74b7f4ccfaa101b1bfe4f64ace9fe8432
ISSN 0022-5347
IngestDate Wed Feb 19 01:32:34 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c455t-bd3f9b85e5e40994873ec3d9e5d1829a74b7f4ccfaa101b1bfe4f64ace9fe8432
PMID 12050555
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_12050555
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2002-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2002-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2002
  text: 2002-00-00
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle The Journal of urology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Urol
PublicationYear 2002
SSID ssj0014572
Score 2.162261
Snippet Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is used for the metabolic evaluation of cancer. [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is commonly used as a radiotracer but...
SourceID pubmed
SourceType Index Database
StartPage 273
SubjectTerms Animals
Choline - analogs & derivatives
Choline - pharmacokinetics
Fluorine Compounds - pharmacokinetics
Fluorine Radioisotopes - pharmacokinetics
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Humans
Male
Metabolic Clearance Rate - physiology
Mice
Mice, Inbred BALB C
Mice, Nude
Neoplasm Transplantation
Prostate - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Radiopharmaceuticals - pharmacokinetics
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tissue Distribution
Tomography, Emission-Computed
Tumor Cells, Cultured
Title Comparison of [18 F]fluorocholine and [18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose for positron emission tomography of androgen dependent and androgen independent prostate cancer
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12050555
Volume 168
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1taxQxEA5XBfGL-K71hXzwQDlWs5fkdvNRT48itB9KCwWRstlNoNLeHu0dWH-M_8r_40xeNntXFfXDLkuyN4TMQ25m9pkZQl4UCvyIQsuMSaszoZjKykrrDC5e57bkjGHu8O7eZOdQfDySR4PBjx5rabXUr-tvv8wr-R-twhjoFbNk_0GznVAYgGfQL9xBw3D_Kx1P-00ER0P5Li9Hs6F8b09XLbbCap0NiaHxzbnGtF8vI10dmYaOvHUOgrD_G0bQwCg9C-WsHVcACxvAQkaxa-4ylnn1wyfzNLHATBKwYZFRVgf275eEyp4NvDpfi-p3Pegd077H325PTYjU7o98m-mOSHRSuWDvfnWZUtU8XTzkkk2RF7i3Ft0Y96IbKdtAcl-VszuxJ-UVaIbz1_dFufK_4EMUF500sN6ZHOInZ4Xcv_5vQMWLMweYfIxt_nwV4T_PbpTsjlNbZAucF-zGiiGk8GlLyKIrYY9LSWllb9L6XjL5KqwNy9oGeRuujzOBDm6TW0Fv9K0H4h0yMPO75MZuYGfcI98THmlr6ae8pLPPa1ikgJe18T4OKeCQRhzSiEOacIhCI-BoBzcnsxvu4ZBGHFKPw_vkcPbhYLqThf4fWS2kXGa64VbpUhppBDgy4FpzU_NGGdmAV6yqQujCirq2VQXbp3NtjbATUdVGWVMKPn5Ars3buXlEaCHHxjJ4UTRMiNIqy5kVpuFawnkk6sfkod_Z44Uv8nIc93z7tzNPyM2E2KfkuoVTxTwDE3WpnzuV_wQTg5L2
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+%5B18+F%5Dfluorocholine+and+%5B18+F%5Dfluorodeoxyglucose+for+positron+emission+tomography+of+androgen+dependent+and+androgen+independent+prostate+cancer&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+urology&rft.au=Price%2C+David+T&rft.au=Coleman%2C+R+Edward&rft.au=Liao%2C+Ray+P&rft.au=Robertson%2C+Cary+N&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.issn=0022-5347&rft.volume=168&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=273&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fs0022-5347%2805%2964906-3&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F12050555&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F12050555&rft.externalDocID=12050555
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-5347&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-5347&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-5347&client=summon