Cross-country validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale using a Brazilian sample

• Published in: Revista brasileira de fisioterapia (São Carlos (São Paulo, Brazil)) Vol. 25; no. 4; pp. 444 - 449
• Main Authors: Gontijo, Ana Paula Bensemann, Mambrini, Juliana Vaz de Melo, Mancini, Marisa Cotta
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Brazil Elsevier España, S.L.U 01.07.2021; Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
• Subjects: Cross-country comparison; Gross-motor skills; Motor development; Original Research; Pediatric; Rehabilitation; Gross-motor skills; Cross-country comparison; Rehabilitation; Motor development; Pediatric
• ISSN: 1413-3555; 1809-9246
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.12.004

•The AIMS normative age scale is appropriate for Brazilian infants.•The sequence of gross motor development for Brazilian infants is similar to Canadian infants.•Ages of attainment vary for some items between samples. Previous validity studies of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS), using raw scores and percentile curves for group comparisons, showed that infants in Brazil achieved gross motor milestones at later ages. Validity of the AIMS norms were later reassessed using a logistic regression model that placed the AIMS items on an age scale. Our study examined the validity of the AIMS norms for Brazilian infants using the recommended method for calculating and comparing item locations. Data from 732 Brazilian infants (2009–11), 3 days to 18 months old, were compared to the AIMS normative sample (n=2202). Logistic regression placed the AIMS items of both samples on age scales representing the age at which 50% of infants passed an item and compared the two datasets. Pearson correlation coefficient tested the association across samples. 47 of the 58 AIMS items met the criterion for stable regression to calculate item locations of the Brazilian dataset. Based on the age when 50% of the infants passed a criterion, most of the items from the Brazilian sample (n=28) differed by two weeks or less compared to the Canadian normative sample. The sequence and age for the emergence of AIMS items were similar between the Brazilian and Canadian samples. Canadian norms are appropriate for clinical decisions and research with Brazilian infants.