Malpractice Liability Risk and Use of Diagnostic Imaging Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Abstract Purpose A widespread concern among physicians is that fear of medical malpractice liability may affect their decisions for diagnostic imaging orders. The purpose of this article is to synthesize evidence regarding the defensive use of imaging services. Methods A literature search was conduc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American College of Radiology Vol. 12; no. 12; pp. 1403 - 1412
Main Authors Li, Suhui, PhD, Brantley, Erin, MPH
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.12.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Purpose A widespread concern among physicians is that fear of medical malpractice liability may affect their decisions for diagnostic imaging orders. The purpose of this article is to synthesize evidence regarding the defensive use of imaging services. Methods A literature search was conducted using a number of databases. The review included peer-reviewed publications that studied the link between physician orders of imaging tests and malpractice liability pressure. Results We identified 13 peer-reviewed studies conducted in the United States. Five of the studies reported physician assessments of the role of defensive medicine in imaging-order decisions; five assessed the association between physicians’ liability risk and imaging ordering, and three assessed the impact of liability risk on imaging ordering at the state level. Although the belief that medical liability risk could influence decisions is highly prevalent among physicians, findings are mixed regarding the impact of liability risk on imaging orders at both the state and physician level. Conclusions Inconclusive evidence suggests that physician ordering of imaging tests is affected by malpractice liability risk. Further research is needed to disentangle defensive medicine from other reasons for inefficient use of imaging.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1546-1440
1558-349X
DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2015.09.015