Colonizations cause diversification of host preferences: A mechanism explaining increased generalization at range boundaries expanding under climate change

• Published in: Global change biology Vol. 27; no. 15; pp. 3505 - 3518
• Main Authors: Singer, Michael C., Parmesan, Camille
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2021; Wiley
• Subjects: Animals; Butterflies; Climate Change; Colonization; Diet; diet breadth; Diversification; ecotypes; Environmental Sciences; extinction–colonization dynamics; foraging; generalization; Genetic diversity; Genetic variation; Haplotypes; homogenization; Host preferences; host shift; meta-analysis; Mitochondrial DNA; oviposition preference; Population; Population genetics; Populations; Preferences; range expansion; Range extension; Specialization; range expansion; generalization; extinction-colonization dynamics; host shift; oviposition preference; specialization; diet breadth; climate change; Climate change; Specialisation; Diet breadth; Generalisation
• ISSN: 1354-1013; 1365-2486; 1365-2486
• DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15656

As species' poleward range limits expand under climate change, generalists are expected to be better colonists than specialists, extending their ranges faster. This effect of specialization on range shifts has been shown, but so has the reverse cause–effect: in a global meta‐analysis of butterfly diets, it was range expansions themselves that caused increases in population‐level diet breadth. What could drive this unexpected process? We provide a novel behavioral mechanism by showing that, in a butterfly with extensive ecotypic variation, Edith's checkerspot, diet breadths increased after colonization events as diversification of individual host preferences pulled novel hosts into population diets. Subsequently, populations that persisted reverted toward monophagy. We draw together three lines of evidence from long‐term studies of 15 independently evolving populations. First, direct observations showed a significant increase in specialization across decades: in recent censuses, eight populations used fewer host genera than in the 1980s while none used more. Second, behavioral preference‐testing experiments showed that extinctions and recolonizations at two sites were followed, at first by diversification of heritable preference ranks and increases in diet breadth, and subsequently by homogenization of preferences and contractions of diet breadth. Third, we found a significant negative association in the 1980s between population‐level diet breadth and genetic diversity. Populations with fewer mtDNA haplotypes had broader diets, extending to 3–4 host genera, while those with higher haplotype diversity were more specialized. We infer that diet breadth had increased in younger, recently colonized populations. Preference diversification after colonization events, whether caused by (cryptic) host shifts or by release of cryptic genetic variation after population bottlenecks, provides a mechanism for known effects of range shifts on diet specialization. Our results explain how colonizations at expanding range margins have increased population‐level diet breadths, and predict that increasing specialization should accompany population persistence as current range edges become range interiors. As species' poleward range limits expand under climate change, generalists are expected to be better colonists than specialists, extending their ranges faster. This effect of specialization on range shifts exists, but so does the reverse cause‐effect: in a meta‐analysis of butterfly diets it was range expansions themselves that caused increases of population‐level diet breadth. What could drive this unexpected process? We provide a behavioral mechanism by showing that, in a butterfly with extensive ecotypic variation, diet breadths increased after colonization events, as diversification of individual host preferences pulled novel hosts into population diets. Subsequently, populations that persisted reverted towards monophagy. ​