Combat experience and the acquired capability for suicide

Rising suicide rates are an increasing concern among military personnel. The interpersonal‐psychological theory of suicide proposes that three necessary factors are needed to die by suicide: feelings that one does not belong with other people, feelings that one is a burden on others or society, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical psychology Vol. 66; no. 10; pp. 1044 - 1056
Main Authors Bryan, Craig J., Cukrowicz, Kelly C., West, Christopher L., Morrow, Chad E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.10.2010
Wiley
Wiley Periodicals Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Rising suicide rates are an increasing concern among military personnel. The interpersonal‐psychological theory of suicide proposes that three necessary factors are needed to die by suicide: feelings that one does not belong with other people, feelings that one is a burden on others or society, and an acquired capability to overcome the fear and pain associated with suicide. The current study tests the theory's proposal that acquired capability may be particularly influenced by military experience, because combat exposure may cause habituation to fear of painful experiences such as suicide. Utilizing clinical and nonclinical samples of military personnel deployed to Iraq, results of the current study indicate that a greater range of combat experiences predicts acquired capability above and beyond depression and post‐traumatic stress disorder symptoms, previous suicidality, and other common risk factors for suicide. Combat experiences did not, however, predict perceived burdensomeness or thwarted belongingness. The authors discuss how combat experiences might serve as a mechanism for elevating suicide risk and implications for clinical interventions and suicide prevention efforts. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol: 66:1–13, 2010.
Bibliography:The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policy of the United States Government, Department of Defense, Department of the Air Force, or Department of the Army.
ark:/67375/WNG-69HMVFDG-7
istex:B8CCBBC0B0E6440746D65E789030EC9822690681
ArticleID:JCLP20703
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-9762
1097-4679
DOI:10.1002/jclp.20703