Behavioral and Socioemotional Outcomes Through Age 5 Years of the Legacy for Children Public Health Approach to Improving Developmental Outcomes Among Children Born Into Poverty
We evaluated Legacy for Children, a public health strategy to improve child health and development among low-income families. Mothers were recruited prenatally or at the birth of a child to participate in Legacy parenting groups for 3 to 5 years. A set of 2 randomized trials in Miami, Florida, and L...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of public health (1971) Vol. 103; no. 6; pp. 1058 - 1066 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Washington, DC
American Public Health Association
01.06.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We evaluated Legacy for Children, a public health strategy to improve child health and development among low-income families.
Mothers were recruited prenatally or at the birth of a child to participate in Legacy parenting groups for 3 to 5 years. A set of 2 randomized trials in Miami, Florida, and Los Angeles, California, between 2001 and 2009 assessed 574 mother-child pairs when the children were 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months old. Intent-to-treat analyses from 12 to 60 months compared groups on child behavioral and socioemotional outcomes.
Children of mothers in the intervention group were at lower risk for behavioral concerns at 24 months and socioemotional problems at 48 months in Miami, and lower risk for hyperactive behavior at 60 months in Los Angeles. Longitudinal analyses indicated that children of intervention mothers in Miami were at lower risk for behavior problems from 24 to 60 months of age.
Randomized controlled trials documented effectiveness of the Legacy model over time while allowing for implementation adaptations by 2 different sites. Broadly disseminable, parent-focused prevention models such as Legacy have potential for public health impact. These investments in prevention might reduce the need for later intervention strategies. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-News-3 content type line 23 Peer Reviewed J. W. Kaminski led the drafting of the article and contributed to analytic decisions and interpretation of results. R. Perou contributed to the intervention and study design, critically reviewed the article, and supervised the evaluation. S. N. Visser designed and conducted statistical analyses, assisted in writing the article, and provided supervision of the evaluation. K. G. Scott, L. Beckwith, and J. Howard guided the study conception and design, supervised development and implementation of the intervention, and critically reviewed the article. D. C. Smith contributed to the study and intervention design, critically reviewed the article, and provided supervision and technical support to the evaluation. M. L. Danielson conducted analyses, provided statistical expertise, and critically reviewed the article. Contributors |
ISSN: | 0090-0036 1541-0048 |
DOI: | 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300996 |