Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Testing of C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin-6, and Procalcitonin in Neonates with Clinically Suspected Sepsis: A Prospective Observational Study
Abstract Objective: Sepsis often prompts clinicians to start empirical antibiotics in suspected neonates while awaiting diagnosis. The next-generation testing with point-of-care (POC) techniques offers a lead-time advantage that could bridge the gap by providing a timely diagnosis. Materials and Met...
Saved in:
Published in | Medical principles and practice Vol. 33; no. 3; pp. 291 - 298 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Basel, Switzerland
S. Karger AG
06.02.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1011-7571 1423-0151 1423-0151 |
DOI | 10.1159/000536678 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Abstract
Objective: Sepsis often prompts clinicians to start empirical antibiotics in suspected neonates while awaiting diagnosis. The next-generation testing with point-of-care (POC) techniques offers a lead-time advantage that could bridge the gap by providing a timely diagnosis. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective diagnostic study in 82 neonates enrolled between May and October 2022 in a level III neonatal intensive care unit. All neonates with a new episode of clinically suspected sepsis were included. Diagnostic accuracy of POC testing of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and procalcitonin (PCT) with standard laboratory methods was performed. Results: The mean gestation age and birth weight of the neonates were 33.17 ± 4.25 weeks and 1,695.4 ± 700.74 grams, respectively. Most neonates were preterm (75%) with nearly equal proportions of early (51.22%) and late-onset (48.78%) sepsis. The POC CRP correlated well with standard CRP (r = 0.8001, 95% CI: 0.706–0.867, p < 0.0001). Among the three biomarkers, CRP had the maximum diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] – 0.73) followed by PCT (AUC – 0.65) and IL-6 (0.55). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of CRP (p = 0.46), PCT (p = 0.29), and IL-6 (p = 0.60) in early- and late-onset sepsis. The mean time for POC estimation of IL-6, PCT, and CRP was 12 ± 3 min which was significantly less compared to 366 ± 61 min for standard techniques (p < 0.001). Conclusion: POC CRP correlates well with standard techniques of estimation, and CRP alone and in combination with PCT has good diagnostic accuracy in neonatal sepsis.
Highlights of the StudyPoint-of-care (POC) C-reactive protein (CRP) levels correlate well with standard laboratory estimation.CRP alone and in combination with procalcitonin (PCT) has maximum diagnostic accuracy in neonatal sepsis.POC testing can be used in both early- and late-onset sepsis with similar diagnostic accuracy.The mean time required for POC estimation of interleukin-6, PCT, and CRP is nearly 12 min which is significantly less than standard techniques. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Sepsis often prompts clinicians to start empirical antibiotics in suspected neonates while awaiting diagnosis. The next-generation testing with point-of-care (POC) techniques offers a lead-time advantage that could bridge the gap by providing a timely diagnosis.OBJECTIVESepsis often prompts clinicians to start empirical antibiotics in suspected neonates while awaiting diagnosis. The next-generation testing with point-of-care (POC) techniques offers a lead-time advantage that could bridge the gap by providing a timely diagnosis.We conducted a prospective diagnostic study in 82 neonates enrolled between May and October 2022 in a level III neonatal intensive care unit. All neonates with a new episode of clinically suspected sepsis were included. Diagnostic accuracy of POC testing of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and procalcitonin (PCT) with standard laboratory methods was performed.MATERIALS AND METHODSWe conducted a prospective diagnostic study in 82 neonates enrolled between May and October 2022 in a level III neonatal intensive care unit. All neonates with a new episode of clinically suspected sepsis were included. Diagnostic accuracy of POC testing of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and procalcitonin (PCT) with standard laboratory methods was performed.The mean gestation age and birth weight of the neonates were 33.17 ± 4.25 weeks and 1,695.4 ± 700.74 grams, respectively. Most neonates were preterm (75%) with nearly equal proportions of early (51.22%) and late-onset (48.78%) sepsis. The POC CRP correlated well with standard CRP (r = 0.8001, 95% CI: 0.706-0.867, p < 0.0001). Among the three biomarkers, CRP had the maximum diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] - 0.73) followed by PCT (AUC - 0.65) and IL-6 (0.55). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of CRP (p = 0.46), PCT (p = 0.29), and IL-6 (p = 0.60) in early- and late-onset sepsis. The mean time for POC estimation of IL-6, PCT, and CRP was 12 ± 3 min which was significantly less compared to 366 ± 61 min for standard techniques (p < 0.001).RESULTSThe mean gestation age and birth weight of the neonates were 33.17 ± 4.25 weeks and 1,695.4 ± 700.74 grams, respectively. Most neonates were preterm (75%) with nearly equal proportions of early (51.22%) and late-onset (48.78%) sepsis. The POC CRP correlated well with standard CRP (r = 0.8001, 95% CI: 0.706-0.867, p < 0.0001). Among the three biomarkers, CRP had the maximum diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] - 0.73) followed by PCT (AUC - 0.65) and IL-6 (0.55). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of CRP (p = 0.46), PCT (p = 0.29), and IL-6 (p = 0.60) in early- and late-onset sepsis. The mean time for POC estimation of IL-6, PCT, and CRP was 12 ± 3 min which was significantly less compared to 366 ± 61 min for standard techniques (p < 0.001).POC CRP correlates well with standard techniques of estimation, and CRP alone and in combination with PCT has good diagnostic accuracy in neonatal sepsis.CONCLUSIONPOC CRP correlates well with standard techniques of estimation, and CRP alone and in combination with PCT has good diagnostic accuracy in neonatal sepsis. Abstract Objective: Sepsis often prompts clinicians to start empirical antibiotics in suspected neonates while awaiting diagnosis. The next-generation testing with point-of-care (POC) techniques offers a lead-time advantage that could bridge the gap by providing a timely diagnosis. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective diagnostic study in 82 neonates enrolled between May and October 2022 in a level III neonatal intensive care unit. All neonates with a new episode of clinically suspected sepsis were included. Diagnostic accuracy of POC testing of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and procalcitonin (PCT) with standard laboratory methods was performed. Results: The mean gestation age and birth weight of the neonates were 33.17 ± 4.25 weeks and 1,695.4 ± 700.74 grams, respectively. Most neonates were preterm (75%) with nearly equal proportions of early (51.22%) and late-onset (48.78%) sepsis. The POC CRP correlated well with standard CRP (r = 0.8001, 95% CI: 0.706–0.867, p < 0.0001). Among the three biomarkers, CRP had the maximum diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] – 0.73) followed by PCT (AUC – 0.65) and IL-6 (0.55). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of CRP (p = 0.46), PCT (p = 0.29), and IL-6 (p = 0.60) in early- and late-onset sepsis. The mean time for POC estimation of IL-6, PCT, and CRP was 12 ± 3 min which was significantly less compared to 366 ± 61 min for standard techniques (p < 0.001). Conclusion: POC CRP correlates well with standard techniques of estimation, and CRP alone and in combination with PCT has good diagnostic accuracy in neonatal sepsis. Highlights of the StudyPoint-of-care (POC) C-reactive protein (CRP) levels correlate well with standard laboratory estimation.CRP alone and in combination with procalcitonin (PCT) has maximum diagnostic accuracy in neonatal sepsis.POC testing can be used in both early- and late-onset sepsis with similar diagnostic accuracy.The mean time required for POC estimation of interleukin-6, PCT, and CRP is nearly 12 min which is significantly less than standard techniques. Objective: Sepsis often prompts clinicians to start empirical antibiotics in suspected neonates while awaiting diagnosis. The next-generation testing with point-of-care (POC) techniques offers a lead-time advantage that could bridge the gap by providing a timely diagnosis. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective diagnostic study in 82 neonates enrolled between May and October 2022 in a level III neonatal intensive care unit. All neonates with a new episode of clinically suspected sepsis were included. Diagnostic accuracy of POC testing of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and procalcitonin (PCT) with standard laboratory methods was performed. Results: The mean gestation age and birth weight of the neonates were 33.17 ± 4.25 weeks and 1,695.4 ± 700.74 grams, respectively. Most neonates were preterm (75%) with nearly equal proportions of early (51.22%) and late-onset (48.78%) sepsis. The POC CRP correlated well with standard CRP (r = 0.8001, 95% CI: 0.706–0.867, p < 0.0001). Among the three biomarkers, CRP had the maximum diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] – 0.73) followed by PCT (AUC – 0.65) and IL-6 (0.55). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of CRP (p = 0.46), PCT (p = 0.29), and IL-6 (p = 0.60) in early- and late-onset sepsis. The mean time for POC estimation of IL-6, PCT, and CRP was 12 ± 3 min which was significantly less compared to 366 ± 61 min for standard techniques (p < 0.001). Conclusion: POC CRP correlates well with standard techniques of estimation, and CRP alone and in combination with PCT has good diagnostic accuracy in neonatal sepsis. [...]in the current scenario, diagnostics that allow rapid confirmation in suspect cases are of vital importance. In this prospective observational study in neonates with clinically suspected sepsis, we evaluated the accuracy of the POC CRP and laboratory CRP for the diagnosis of sepsis and determined the correlation of values obtained by two techniques. Micro-ESR was done in the unit side laboratory, where blood was collected in a pre-heparinized microhematocrit tube with a length of 75 mm, an internal diameter of 1.1 mm, and an external diameter of 1.5 mm. One end of the capillary was sealed by soap wax, and the microhematocrit tube was fixed vertically and left undisturbed for an hour. Data Collection and Analysis Details of antenatal risk factors and birth details such as mode of delivery, gestational age, and birth weight were noted. Sepsis often prompts clinicians to start empirical antibiotics in suspected neonates while awaiting diagnosis. The next-generation testing with point-of-care (POC) techniques offers a lead-time advantage that could bridge the gap by providing a timely diagnosis. We conducted a prospective diagnostic study in 82 neonates enrolled between May and October 2022 in a level III neonatal intensive care unit. All neonates with a new episode of clinically suspected sepsis were included. Diagnostic accuracy of POC testing of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and procalcitonin (PCT) with standard laboratory methods was performed. The mean gestation age and birth weight of the neonates were 33.17 ± 4.25 weeks and 1,695.4 ± 700.74 grams, respectively. Most neonates were preterm (75%) with nearly equal proportions of early (51.22%) and late-onset (48.78%) sepsis. The POC CRP correlated well with standard CRP (r = 0.8001, 95% CI: 0.706-0.867, p < 0.0001). Among the three biomarkers, CRP had the maximum diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] - 0.73) followed by PCT (AUC - 0.65) and IL-6 (0.55). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of CRP (p = 0.46), PCT (p = 0.29), and IL-6 (p = 0.60) in early- and late-onset sepsis. The mean time for POC estimation of IL-6, PCT, and CRP was 12 ± 3 min which was significantly less compared to 366 ± 61 min for standard techniques (p < 0.001). POC CRP correlates well with standard techniques of estimation, and CRP alone and in combination with PCT has good diagnostic accuracy in neonatal sepsis. |
Author | Haribalakrishna, Anitha RR, Prashanth Goyal, Medha Mascarenhas, Dwayne |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Medha surname: Goyal fullname: Goyal, Medha – sequence: 2 givenname: Dwayne surname: Mascarenhas fullname: Mascarenhas, Dwayne email: *Dwayne Mascarenhas, dwayne.mascarenhas@mail.utoronto.ca – sequence: 3 givenname: Prashanth surname: RR fullname: RR, Prashanth – sequence: 4 givenname: Anitha surname: Haribalakrishna fullname: Haribalakrishna, Anitha |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38320541$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkl1r2zAUhs3oWNtsF7sfQ9CbDepVsj4c92aE7KOFbg1Ld21k-ShV60iZJGfkf-0HTm7asJWCQELvc16dDx1me9ZZyLLXBH8ghFcnGGNOhSjHz7IDwgqaY8LJXjpjQvKSl2Q_OwzhJmFjSvGLbJ-OaYE5IwfZn09GLqwL0Sg0Uar3Um2Q02jmjI250_lUekBXkAC7GIRp_gOkimYNaOZdBGOP0bmN4Dvob43NxTGSth00JTtlorPGorS-g7MyQkC_TbxG085Yk4Bug-Z9WIGK0KI5rIIJp2gyRN9dDq9cNgH8WkaT4js0j327eZk917IL8Op-H2U_v3y-mp7lF5dfz6eTi1wxTmPOZMNbyfgYM1JiKBqhSqULoVkrWKXLZgyFLolmDRNtJSpGSKGF0IJLJgpW0lH2ceu76psltAps9LKrV94spd_UTpr6f8Wa63rh1jUhpOQC0-Tw7t7Bu1996mK9NEFB10kLrg91URWUFlQQntCjR-iN632qOdQUl5jjapjeKHv7b0q7XB4mmoD3W0ClHgYPeocQXA-_pd79lsSePGLTwO46naox3ZMRb7YRt9IvwO-8d_LRk_K32WxL1KtW07-85NdB |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1177_17534259241306237 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcimb_2025_1518088 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12887_024_05323_8 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41390_025_03807_6 |
Cites_doi | 10.1515/CCLM.2009.246 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30148-6 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02519 10.1038/s41372-019-0363-4 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31444-7 10.1038/s41390-022-02329-9 10.1080/14767058.2017.1322060 10.1016/j.cca.2021.06.021 10.3389/fped.2022.840778 10.1159/000336629 10.1093/tropej/fmy082 10.1016/j.bios.2023.115181 10.1186/s12879-017-2396-7 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel. 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/reusing-open-access-and-sage-choice-content 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel 2024 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel – notice: 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel. – notice: 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/reusing-open-access-and-sage-choice-content – notice: 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel 2024 |
DBID | M-- AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA BENPR CCPQU FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1159/000536678 |
DatabaseName | Karger Open Access Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Database Suite (ProQuest) ProQuest One Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: M-- name: Karger (Open access) url: https://www.karger.com/OpenAccess sourceTypes: Enrichment Source Publisher – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Testing in Neonates with Suspected Sepsis |
EISSN | 1423-0151 |
EndPage | 298 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC11175603 38320541 10_1159_000536678 536678 |
Genre | Journal Article Observational Study |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 0~B 30W 326 36B 3O. 3V. 4.4 53G 5GY 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ 8UI AAWTL AAYIC ABPAZ ABUWG ACGFS ADBBV AENEX AEYAO AFKRA AHMBA ALDHI ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS AZPMC BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU CS3 DU5 E0A E3Z EBS EMB EMOBN F5P FB. FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ HMCUK HYE HZ~ IAO IHR KUZGX M-- M1P MK0 O1H O9- OK1 P2P PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RKO RNS RPM SV3 UJ6 UKHRP AAYXX ABBTS ABWCG ACQXL ADAGL AFJJK AFSIO AHFRZ AIOBO CAG CITATION COF CYUIP DIK EJD ITC PHGZM PHGZT RIG RXVBD TR2 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY 7XB 8FK K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-4ab5da45804170e2b6c7cf26f4d649f7b8e2f71f4b46d9694112f66f65a462473 |
IEDL.DBID | M-- |
ISSN | 1011-7571 1423-0151 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:33:49 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:38:19 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 21:11:26 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:03:36 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:59:41 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:57:52 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 31 21:00:34 EDT 2024 Thu Aug 29 12:04:21 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | Diagnosis Biological markers Neonatal intensive care units Bedside testing |
Language | English |
License | This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC) (http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c453t-4ab5da45804170e2b6c7cf26f4d649f7b8e2f71f4b46d9694112f66f65a462473 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
OpenAccessLink | https://karger.com/doi/10.1159/000536678 |
PMID | 38320541 |
PQID | 3070509083 |
PQPubID | 2047984 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_3070509083 crossref_primary_10_1159_000536678 crossref_citationtrail_10_1159_000536678 pubmed_primary_38320541 karger_primary_536678 proquest_miscellaneous_2923323615 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11175603 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-02-06 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-02-06 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2024 text: 2024-02-06 day: 06 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Basel, Switzerland |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Basel, Switzerland – name: Switzerland – name: Basel |
PublicationTitle | Medical principles and practice |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Med Princ Pract |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | S. Karger AG |
Publisher_xml | – name: S. Karger AG |
References | Jyoti A, Kumar S, Kumar Srivastava V, Kaushik S, Govind Singh S. Neonatal sepsis at point of care. Clin Chim Acta. 2021;521:45–58. . Zecca E, Barone G, Corsello M, Romagnoli C, Tiberi E, Tirone C, . Reliability of two different bedside assays for C-reactive protein in newborn infants. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47(9):1081–4. . Hofer N, Zacharias E, Müller W, Resch B. An update on the use of C-reactive protein in early-onset neonatal sepsis: current insights and new tasks. Neonatology. 2012;102(1):25–36. . Prince K, Omar F, Joolay Y. A comparison of point of care C-reactive protein test to standard C-reactive protein laboratory measurement in a neonatal intensive care unit setting. J Trop Pediatr. 2019;65(5):498–504. . Amare D, Mela M, Dessie G. Unfinished agenda of the neonates in developing countries: magnitude of neonatal sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2019;5(9):e02519. . Sharma D, Farahbakhsh N, Shastri S, Sharma P. Biomarkers for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(12):1646–59. . Investigators of the Delhi Neonatal Infection Study DeNIS Collaboration, SankarHealth JN, Centre K. Characterisation and antimicrobial resistance of sepsis pathogens in neonates born in tertiary care centres in Delhi, India: a cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(10):e752–60. . Küng E, Unterasinger L, Waldhör T, Berger A, Wisgrill L. Cut-off values of serum interleukin-6 for culture-confirmed sepsis in neonates. Pediatr Res. 2022;93(7):1969–74. . Bradley Z, Bhalla N. Point-of-care diagnostics for sepsis using clinical biomarkers and microfluidic technology. Biosens Bioelectron. 2023;227:115181. . Eschborn S, Weitkamp JH. Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein: review of kinetics and performance for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. J Perinatol. 2019;39(7):893–903. . Pontrelli G, De Crescenzo F, Buzzetti R, Jenkner A, Balduzzi S, Calò Carducci F, . Accuracy of serum procalcitonin for the diagnosis of sepsis in neonates and children with systemic inflammatory syndrome: a meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17:302–2. . Stocker M, Van Herk W, El Helou S, Dutta S, Fontana MS, Schuerman FA, . Procalcitonin-guided decision making for duration of antibiotic therapy in neonates with suspected early-onset sepsis: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (NeoPIns). Lancet. 2017;390(10097):871–81. . Kumar Y, Qunibi M, Neal TJ, Yoxall CW. Time to positivity of neonatal blood cultures. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000;85(3):F182–6. Eichberger J, Resch B. Reliability of interleukin-6 alone and in combination for diagnosis of early onset neonatal sepsis: systematic review. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:10. . ref13 ref12 ref11 ref10 ref2 ref1 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 |
References_xml | – reference: Investigators of the Delhi Neonatal Infection Study DeNIS Collaboration, SankarHealth JN, Centre K. Characterisation and antimicrobial resistance of sepsis pathogens in neonates born in tertiary care centres in Delhi, India: a cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(10):e752–60. . – reference: Stocker M, Van Herk W, El Helou S, Dutta S, Fontana MS, Schuerman FA, . Procalcitonin-guided decision making for duration of antibiotic therapy in neonates with suspected early-onset sepsis: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (NeoPIns). Lancet. 2017;390(10097):871–81. . – reference: Kumar Y, Qunibi M, Neal TJ, Yoxall CW. Time to positivity of neonatal blood cultures. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000;85(3):F182–6. – reference: Amare D, Mela M, Dessie G. Unfinished agenda of the neonates in developing countries: magnitude of neonatal sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2019;5(9):e02519. . – reference: Pontrelli G, De Crescenzo F, Buzzetti R, Jenkner A, Balduzzi S, Calò Carducci F, . Accuracy of serum procalcitonin for the diagnosis of sepsis in neonates and children with systemic inflammatory syndrome: a meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17:302–2. . – reference: Prince K, Omar F, Joolay Y. A comparison of point of care C-reactive protein test to standard C-reactive protein laboratory measurement in a neonatal intensive care unit setting. J Trop Pediatr. 2019;65(5):498–504. . – reference: Eschborn S, Weitkamp JH. Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein: review of kinetics and performance for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. J Perinatol. 2019;39(7):893–903. . – reference: Jyoti A, Kumar S, Kumar Srivastava V, Kaushik S, Govind Singh S. Neonatal sepsis at point of care. Clin Chim Acta. 2021;521:45–58. . – reference: Küng E, Unterasinger L, Waldhör T, Berger A, Wisgrill L. Cut-off values of serum interleukin-6 for culture-confirmed sepsis in neonates. Pediatr Res. 2022;93(7):1969–74. . – reference: Hofer N, Zacharias E, Müller W, Resch B. An update on the use of C-reactive protein in early-onset neonatal sepsis: current insights and new tasks. Neonatology. 2012;102(1):25–36. . – reference: Zecca E, Barone G, Corsello M, Romagnoli C, Tiberi E, Tirone C, . Reliability of two different bedside assays for C-reactive protein in newborn infants. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47(9):1081–4. . – reference: Sharma D, Farahbakhsh N, Shastri S, Sharma P. Biomarkers for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(12):1646–59. . – reference: Bradley Z, Bhalla N. Point-of-care diagnostics for sepsis using clinical biomarkers and microfluidic technology. Biosens Bioelectron. 2023;227:115181. . – reference: Eichberger J, Resch B. Reliability of interleukin-6 alone and in combination for diagnosis of early onset neonatal sepsis: systematic review. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:10. . – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2009.246 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30148-6 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02519 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0363-4 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31444-7 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02329-9 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1322060 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.06.021 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.840778 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1159/000336629 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmy082 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2023.115181 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2396-7 |
SSID | ssj0008330 |
Score | 2.3575263 |
Snippet | Abstract
Objective: Sepsis often prompts clinicians to start empirical antibiotics in suspected neonates while awaiting diagnosis. The next-generation testing... Objective: Sepsis often prompts clinicians to start empirical antibiotics in suspected neonates while awaiting diagnosis. The next-generation testing with... Sepsis often prompts clinicians to start empirical antibiotics in suspected neonates while awaiting diagnosis. The next-generation testing with point-of-care... [...]in the current scenario, diagnostics that allow rapid confirmation in suspect cases are of vital importance. In this prospective observational study in... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref karger |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 291 |
SubjectTerms | Accuracy Antibiotics Antibodies Antigens Automation Bacterial infections Biomarkers Biomarkers - blood Blood tests C-reactive protein C-Reactive Protein - analysis Cytokines Female Gestational Age Humans Infant, Newborn Intensive Care Units, Neonatal Interleukin-6 - blood Laboratories Leukocytes Male Medical diagnosis Neonatal care Neonatal Sepsis - blood Neonatal Sepsis - diagnosis Neutrophils Newborn babies Observational studies Original Paper Point of care testing Procalcitonin - blood Prospective Studies Proteins Sample size Sensitivity and Specificity Sensors Sepsis Sepsis - blood Sepsis - diagnosis Viral infections |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3Nb9MwFLdgIMQF8TEgYyCDOHCYReI4dsIFVYNpQuqo2Cb1FtmOPaJVTtc0h_5f_IH4OWnYpgkpJ7_XptX79PPz7yH0UdDKSCENyVTOCePe5pT3lMRqykUseaECXNP0hB-fsx_zbD4U3NqhrXLrE4OjrhoNNfLPoJs-uPmM4evyisDUKDhdHUZo3EcPALoMNl9iPm64PG_aoxEkCRGZSAZkIR_Bwyy7lHOYrnYtHj28hPbr1V3Z5u2myWtR6OgpejKkj3jSy_sZumfcc_RoOhyQv0B_vvWtc56MJ1p3K6k3uLF41tRuTRpL4L4RPgNoDXcBhEPyy8jg8_AMIBtqd4BDlXBhusvaEX6ApauA5oWpvfm72mH_nBgou5sWQyEXD-iii8UGn3bh8qap8KlZtnX7BU_g09sbnfinGuvA_o9AG-NmF50ffT87PCbDYAaiWZauCZMqqyTLALtIxIYqroW2lFtWcVZYoXJDrUgsU4xXBVyVTajl3PJMMk6ZSF-iHdc48xphk8UqV7koJLXMxklupI-P_vtTKZTSNEKftuIp9YBaDsMzFmXYvWRFOUoyQh9G1mUP1XEX024v45Flu75_a306m_WkcllZT95qRDkYeVv-U8kIvR_J3jzhzEU603RtSX0CnQLATRahV70CjW9IvTf1GXMSofyGao0MAP19k-Lq3wECPAGEVR6ne___XW_QY-qTsNBlzvfRznrVmbc-iVqrd8FS_gLsrBw0 priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Testing of C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin-6, and Procalcitonin in Neonates with Clinically Suspected Sepsis: A Prospective Observational Study |
URI | https://karger.com/doi/10.1159/000536678 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38320541 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3070509083 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2923323615 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11175603 |
Volume | 33 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwdV1La9wwEBZNUkIupY-0dZsuaumhhwjWsizZvW3ThFDYrckD9mYkW2pNFnmJ14f9X_2BHckPuiEFnzSShZiHRqOZTwh9FrTUUkhNYpVwwjjonAJLSUxBuZhKnioP1zRf8Mtb9mMZL_t4h6uFuXP5zx4adcQWgA3XPz0XcTCse-gAzlGRk-g5IaPNTaKowx0IQyJiEfYYQjtDj9AhHMco-Cjhzib0tJvzMRfzYabkP1vPxXP0rPcZ8axj8gv0RNuX6HDe34q_Qn--d_lyQMazomjvZbHFtcFZXdkNqQ1xRUb4xuFp2F-OcEautPSGDmcOp6Gyp9iHBle6vass4adY2tLRgIMF6LytLIZvoV2sXTfYRW9xDym6Wm3xdesrNnWJr_W6qZqveOZGD2Wc-Kcag7-wEJe7uD1GtxfnN2eXpH-NgRQsjjaESRWXksUOsEhMNVW8EIWh3LCSs9QIlWhqRGiYYrxMXX1sSA3nhseSccpE9Brt29rqtwjreKoSlYhUUsPMNEy0hE0R_h9JoVRBA_RlYE9e9FDl7sWMVe6PLHGaj0wN0Kex67rD53is03HH47HL0H7yoH2eZR0pX5cGyINE5L1mN7mzkeBkgcQF6ONIBp10Fy3S6rptcgpec-RQbeIAvekEaJxhEMEAJTuiNXZweN-7FFv99rjfoYNV5dPo3X-W8x4dUXC5fE45P0H7m_tWfwCXaaMmaE8sxQQdfDtfZFcTH3iYeA36C_F0FEY |
linkProvider | Karger AG |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELfGQMAL4mNAYYBBIPGwiMRx7BYJoWpj6thaKtZJfQt2YkO0yilNK9R_iif-QO7yxTZNvE3KU85JHN357ny--x0hryVLjZLKeJHuCo8LWHMaNKVnEyakr0RPl3BNw5EYnPDP02i6QX43tTCYVtnoxFJRp3mCMfJ3KJtg3MBj-Dj_6WHXKDxdbVpoVGJxaNa_YMtWfDjYA_6-YWz_02R34NVdBbyER-HS40pHqeIRAu9I3zAtEplYJixPBe9ZqbuGWRlYrrlIe1jnGTArhBWR4oJxGcJ7r5HrYHh9TCGU03aDB3MLK_SDIPBkJIMayQg8hrJ3XigEdnM7Y_9unGK69-Iy7_ZikuYZq7d_l9yp3VXar-TrHtkw7j65OawP5B-QP3tVqh6QaT9JVguVrGlu6TjP3NLLrYf1TXSCUB7uOxJ2va9GlTqWjhEiInM7tIxKzszqNHOe2KHKpUgD4UlA3bjMUbhGBsP8pqAYOKY1mulstqbHq7JY1KT02MyLrHhP-_h0U0FKv-g27gw_gmmT6y1yciUse0g2Xe7MY0JN5Ouu7sqeYpZbP-gaBfYY3h8qqXXCOuRtw544qVHSsVnHLC53S1EvbjnZIa_aofMKGuSyQVsVj9shzf3tC_eH43FFiuepBXIjEXGtVIr43xLokJctGdQBnvEoZ_JVETNw2EME1Ik65FElQO0XQtDe4KEHHdI9J1rtAIQaP09x2Y8ScjxARFfhh0_-P68X5NZgMjyKjw5Gh0_JbQYOYJnhLrbJ5nKxMs_AgVvq5-WqoeTbVS_Tv-I_V90 |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELfGQBMviI8BhQEGgcTDrDWOY6dICFUr1cZoqdgm9S3Yjg3RKqc0rVD_L5746zjni22aeJuUp5ybpLpPn-9-h9BrQVMjhTQkUjEnjIPOKbCUxGrKRVfynirhmkZjfnDKPk2j6Qb60_TC-LLKxiaWhjrNtc-R73nZBOcGEcOercsiJoPhh_lP4idI-ZPWZpxGJSJHZv0Ltm_F-8MB8PoNpcOPJ_sHpJ4wQDSLwiVhUkWpZJEH4RFdQxXXQlvKLUs561mhYkOtCCxTjKc93_MZUMu55ZFknDIRwnNvoJsiBLcJuiSm7WYPvjOskBCCgIhIBDWqEUQP5Ry9kHM_2e2cL7x15ku_F1dFupcLNs95wOFddKcOXXG_krV7aMO4-2hrVB_OP0C_B1XZHpBxX-vVQuo1zi2e5JlbktwS3-uETzysh_vuCfvkq5GlvcUTDxeRuV1cZihnZnWWOcJ3sXSpp4EgaTA9LnMYrrHxKX9TYJ9ExjWy6Wy2xsersnHUpPjYzIuseIf7_tdNNyn-otocNPwRX0K53kan18Kyh2jT5c48RthEXRWrWPQktcx2g9hI8M3w_FAKpTTtoLcNexJdI6b7wR2zpNw5Rb2k5WQHvWqXziuYkKsWbVc8bpc093cu3R9NJhUpmacWyI1EJLWBKZJ_6tBBL1symAZ_3iOdyVdFQiF4Dz24TtRBjyoBat8QgiWHaD3ooPiCaLULPOz4RYrLfpTw44FHd-Xd8Mn_v-sF2gIFTT4fjo-eotsUYsGy2J3voM3lYmWeQSy3VM9LpcHo23Vr6V_nalwT |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic+Accuracy+of+Point-of-Care+Testing+of+C-Reactive+Protein%2C+Interleukin-6%2C+and+Procalcitonin+in+Neonates+with+Clinically+Suspected+Sepsis%3A+A+Prospective+Observational+Study&rft.jtitle=Medical+principles+and+practice&rft.au=Goyal%2C+Medha&rft.au=Mascarenhas%2C+Dwayne&rft.au=RR%2C+Prashanth&rft.au=Haribalakrishna%2C+Anitha&rft.date=2024-02-06&rft.pub=S.+Karger+AG&rft.issn=1011-7571&rft.eissn=1423-0151&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=298&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159%2F000536678&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F38320541&rft.externalDocID=PMC11175603 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1011-7571&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1011-7571&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1011-7571&client=summon |