Influence of milling type on tef injera quality

•Tef grain is a very attractive gluten-free cereal.•Tef injera sensorial quality is affected by the type of mill used to grind tef grain.•Injera starch digestibility is influenced by mill type.•The use of software in injera quality evaluation improves injera quality evaluation method. Injera is an E...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood chemistry Vol. 266; pp. 155 - 160
Main Authors Assefa, Yoseph, Emire, Shimelis, Villanueva, Marina, Abebe, Workineh, Ronda, Felicidad
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 15.11.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Tef grain is a very attractive gluten-free cereal.•Tef injera sensorial quality is affected by the type of mill used to grind tef grain.•Injera starch digestibility is influenced by mill type.•The use of software in injera quality evaluation improves injera quality evaluation method. Injera is an Ethiopian flat bread that is mostly made from tef flour. Injera making on an industrial scale holds a significant economic and social interest but requires a thorough study of how the process variables affect the product quality. The aim of this work was to investigate the effects of mill type (hammer, disc, and blade) on injera sensory quality and starch digestibility. The application of software for the determination of injera quality descriptors and its comparison with visual human eye evaluation was also established. Injera made with disc mill flour had higher overall acceptability (6.6) than that obtained from hammer mill (4.2) and blade mill (4.1) flours. The injera made with blade mill flour obtained the lowest rapidly available glucose and rapidly digestible starch. The outcome of introducing software for the determinations of injera number of eyes was found effective; its difference with human eye determination was insignificant.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0308-8146
1873-7072
DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.05.126