Normal values for esophageal high‐resolution manometry
Background Esophageal high‐resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile‐sensing catheter technology (Given Imag...
Saved in:
Published in | Neurogastroenterology and motility Vol. 25; no. 9; pp. 762 - e579 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.09.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background
Esophageal high‐resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile‐sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). We wished to determine normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor).
Methods
Fifty‐two healthy volunteers underwent supine HRM. Each subject swallowed 10 liquid water boluses. Esophageal contraction parameters were evaluated and normal values were calculated (defined as 5th and 95th percentile of values).
Key Results
The normal range for the following parameters was calculated; distal contractile integral (mean 1319.44, with a 5–95th percentile range [185.65–3407.60]), contractile front velocity (mean 3.98, 5–95th percentile range [2.40–6.50]), Intrabolus pressure (mean 9.68, range [1.00–19.00]), contraction amplitude measured 5 cm above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ; mean 78.76, range [23.00–146.00]), contraction amplitude 15 cm above the EGJ (mean 43.66, range [3.60–96.00]), transition zone (TZ) length (mean 1.34, range [0.00–5.63]), upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure (mean 81.63, range [19.50–165.10]), EGJ length (mean 2.97, range [2.17–4.00]), EGJ resting pressure (mean 29.35, range [8.95–51.40]), EGJ relaxation pressure (mean 16.79, range [1.00–39.35]), IRPs4 (mean 13.42, range [2.59–28.28]), and gastric pressure (mean 5.06, range [0.00–9.46]).
Conclusions & Inferences
Overall, the normal values of esophageal HRM parameters obtained with the Unisensor catheter resemble those of the previously published series. Marked differences in upper limits of normal were found for parameters related to the esophageal sphincters and TZ length. Users of HRM should be aware of these differences and define pathology based on comparison to appropriate normal values.
Esophageal high‐resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile‐sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). In this article, normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor) were established. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile-sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). We wished to determine normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor). Fifty-two healthy volunteers underwent supine HRM. Each subject swallowed 10 liquid water boluses. Esophageal contraction parameters were evaluated and normal values were calculated (defined as 5th and 95th percentile of values). The normal range for the following parameters was calculated; distal contractile integral (mean 1319.44, with a 5-95th percentile range [185.65-3407.60]), contractile front velocity (mean 3.98, 5-95th percentile range [2.40-6.50]), Intrabolus pressure (mean 9.68, range [1.00-19.00]), contraction amplitude measured 5 cm above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ; mean 78.76, range [23.00-146.00]), contraction amplitude 15 cm above the EGJ (mean 43.66, range [3.60-96.00]), transition zone (TZ) length (mean 1.34, range [0.00-5.63]), upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure (mean 81.63, range [19.50-165.10]), EGJ length (mean 2.97, range [2.17-4.00]), EGJ resting pressure (mean 29.35, range [8.95-51.40]), EGJ relaxation pressure (mean 16.79, range [1.00-39.35]), IRPs4 (mean 13.42, range [2.59-28.28]), and gastric pressure (mean 5.06, range [0.00-9.46]). Overall, the normal values of esophageal HRM parameters obtained with the Unisensor catheter resemble those of the previously published series. Marked differences in upper limits of normal were found for parameters related to the esophageal sphincters and TZ length. Users of HRM should be aware of these differences and define pathology based on comparison to appropriate normal values. Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile-sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). In this article, normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor) were established. Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile-sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). We wished to determine normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor). Fifty-two healthy volunteers underwent supine HRM. Each subject swallowed 10 liquid water boluses. Esophageal contraction parameters were evaluated and normal values were calculated (defined as 5th and 95th percentile of values). The normal range for the following parameters was calculated; distal contractile integral (mean 1319.44, with a 5-95th percentile range [185.65-3407.60]), contractile front velocity (mean 3.98, 5-95th percentile range [2.40-6.50]), Intrabolus pressure (mean 9.68, range [1.00-19.00]), contraction amplitude measured 5 cm above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ; mean 78.76, range [23.00-146.00]), contraction amplitude 15 cm above the EGJ (mean 43.66, range [3.60-96.00]), transition zone (TZ) length (mean 1.34, range [0.00-5.63]), upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure (mean 81.63, range [19.50-165.10]), EGJ length (mean 2.97, range [2.17-4.00]), EGJ resting pressure (mean 29.35, range [8.95-51.40]), EGJ relaxation pressure (mean 16.79, range [1.00-39.35]), IRPs4 (mean 13.42, range [2.59-28.28]), and gastric pressure (mean 5.06, range [0.00-9.46]). Overall, the normal values of esophageal HRM parameters obtained with the Unisensor catheter resemble those of the previously published series. Marked differences in upper limits of normal were found for parameters related to the esophageal sphincters and TZ length. Users of HRM should be aware of these differences and define pathology based on comparison to appropriate normal values. Background Esophageal high‐resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile‐sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). We wished to determine normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor). Methods Fifty‐two healthy volunteers underwent supine HRM. Each subject swallowed 10 liquid water boluses. Esophageal contraction parameters were evaluated and normal values were calculated (defined as 5th and 95th percentile of values). Key Results The normal range for the following parameters was calculated; distal contractile integral (mean 1319.44, with a 5–95th percentile range [185.65–3407.60]), contractile front velocity (mean 3.98, 5–95th percentile range [2.40–6.50]), Intrabolus pressure (mean 9.68, range [1.00–19.00]), contraction amplitude measured 5 cm above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ; mean 78.76, range [23.00–146.00]), contraction amplitude 15 cm above the EGJ (mean 43.66, range [3.60–96.00]), transition zone (TZ) length (mean 1.34, range [0.00–5.63]), upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure (mean 81.63, range [19.50–165.10]), EGJ length (mean 2.97, range [2.17–4.00]), EGJ resting pressure (mean 29.35, range [8.95–51.40]), EGJ relaxation pressure (mean 16.79, range [1.00–39.35]), IRPs4 (mean 13.42, range [2.59–28.28]), and gastric pressure (mean 5.06, range [0.00–9.46]). Conclusions & Inferences Overall, the normal values of esophageal HRM parameters obtained with the Unisensor catheter resemble those of the previously published series. Marked differences in upper limits of normal were found for parameters related to the esophageal sphincters and TZ length. Users of HRM should be aware of these differences and define pathology based on comparison to appropriate normal values. Esophageal high‐resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile‐sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). In this article, normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor) were established. Background Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile-sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). We wished to determine normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor). Methods Fifty-two healthy volunteers underwent supine HRM. Each subject swallowed 10 liquid water boluses. Esophageal contraction parameters were evaluated and normal values were calculated (defined as 5th and 95th percentile of values). Key Results The normal range for the following parameters was calculated; distal contractile integral (mean 1319.44, with a 5-95th percentile range [185.65-3407.60]), contractile front velocity (mean 3.98, 5-95th percentile range [2.40-6.50]), Intrabolus pressure (mean 9.68, range [1.00-19.00]), contraction amplitude measured 5 cm above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ; mean 78.76, range [23.00-146.00]), contraction amplitude 15 cm above the EGJ (mean 43.66, range [3.60-96.00]), transition zone (TZ) length (mean 1.34, range [0.00-5.63]), upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure (mean 81.63, range [19.50-165.10]), EGJ length (mean 2.97, range [2.17-4.00]), EGJ resting pressure (mean 29.35, range [8.95-51.40]), EGJ relaxation pressure (mean 16.79, range [1.00-39.35]), IRPs4 (mean 13.42, range [2.59-28.28]), and gastric pressure (mean 5.06, range [0.00-9.46]). Conclusions & Inferences Overall, the normal values of esophageal HRM parameters obtained with the Unisensor catheter resemble those of the previously published series. Marked differences in upper limits of normal were found for parameters related to the esophageal sphincters and TZ length. Users of HRM should be aware of these differences and define pathology based on comparison to appropriate normal values [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]. Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile-sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). We wished to determine normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor).BACKGROUNDEsophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile-sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). We wished to determine normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor).Fifty-two healthy volunteers underwent supine HRM. Each subject swallowed 10 liquid water boluses. Esophageal contraction parameters were evaluated and normal values were calculated (defined as 5th and 95th percentile of values).METHODSFifty-two healthy volunteers underwent supine HRM. Each subject swallowed 10 liquid water boluses. Esophageal contraction parameters were evaluated and normal values were calculated (defined as 5th and 95th percentile of values).The normal range for the following parameters was calculated; distal contractile integral (mean 1319.44, with a 5-95th percentile range [185.65-3407.60]), contractile front velocity (mean 3.98, 5-95th percentile range [2.40-6.50]), Intrabolus pressure (mean 9.68, range [1.00-19.00]), contraction amplitude measured 5 cm above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ; mean 78.76, range [23.00-146.00]), contraction amplitude 15 cm above the EGJ (mean 43.66, range [3.60-96.00]), transition zone (TZ) length (mean 1.34, range [0.00-5.63]), upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure (mean 81.63, range [19.50-165.10]), EGJ length (mean 2.97, range [2.17-4.00]), EGJ resting pressure (mean 29.35, range [8.95-51.40]), EGJ relaxation pressure (mean 16.79, range [1.00-39.35]), IRPs4 (mean 13.42, range [2.59-28.28]), and gastric pressure (mean 5.06, range [0.00-9.46]).KEY RESULTSThe normal range for the following parameters was calculated; distal contractile integral (mean 1319.44, with a 5-95th percentile range [185.65-3407.60]), contractile front velocity (mean 3.98, 5-95th percentile range [2.40-6.50]), Intrabolus pressure (mean 9.68, range [1.00-19.00]), contraction amplitude measured 5 cm above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ; mean 78.76, range [23.00-146.00]), contraction amplitude 15 cm above the EGJ (mean 43.66, range [3.60-96.00]), transition zone (TZ) length (mean 1.34, range [0.00-5.63]), upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure (mean 81.63, range [19.50-165.10]), EGJ length (mean 2.97, range [2.17-4.00]), EGJ resting pressure (mean 29.35, range [8.95-51.40]), EGJ relaxation pressure (mean 16.79, range [1.00-39.35]), IRPs4 (mean 13.42, range [2.59-28.28]), and gastric pressure (mean 5.06, range [0.00-9.46]).Overall, the normal values of esophageal HRM parameters obtained with the Unisensor catheter resemble those of the previously published series. Marked differences in upper limits of normal were found for parameters related to the esophageal sphincters and TZ length. Users of HRM should be aware of these differences and define pathology based on comparison to appropriate normal values.CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCESOverall, the normal values of esophageal HRM parameters obtained with the Unisensor catheter resemble those of the previously published series. Marked differences in upper limits of normal were found for parameters related to the esophageal sphincters and TZ length. Users of HRM should be aware of these differences and define pathology based on comparison to appropriate normal values. |
Author | Bredenoord, A. J. Bogte, A. Siersema, P. D. Oors, J. Smout, A. J. P. M. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: A. surname: Bogte fullname: Bogte, A. organization: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology – sequence: 2 givenname: A. J. surname: Bredenoord fullname: Bredenoord, A. J. organization: Academic Medical Center – sequence: 3 givenname: J. surname: Oors fullname: Oors, J. organization: Academic Medical Center – sequence: 4 givenname: P. D. surname: Siersema fullname: Siersema, P. D. organization: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology – sequence: 5 givenname: A. J. P. M. surname: Smout fullname: Smout, A. J. P. M. organization: Academic Medical Center |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23803156$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkctOwzAQRS1UxHvBD6BKbGAR6vEjTpYI8ZKAbmBtuc2YBiVxsRNQd3wC38iX4NJ2U4HEbDwanXs1nrtLeo1rkJBDoGcQa9DU7gwYpGqD7ABPZcLyjPXmvaQJ5Exuk90QXiilKRPpFtlmPKMcZLpDsgfna1P130zVYehb5_sY3HRinjFOJ-Xz5Ovj08dR1bWla_q1aVyNrZ_tk01rqoAHy3ePPF1dPl7cJHfD69uL87tkLCRTiWG2AIWcWYuS5YIJFBQzwTkahaoorLQ2ZSktlIGR4Ch4Lk0mAHnGWZHzPXKy8J169xpXbHVdhjFWlWnQdUGDYIoCz0H9A4UMhFLAInq8hr64zjfxI3MqFVwxKSN1tKS6UY2FnvqyNn6mV-eLwGABjL0LwaPV47I180O13pSVBqrnAekYkP4JKCpO1xQr09_Ypft7WeHsb1A_3A8Xim_xjp3x |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_14193 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00455_016_9743_5 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13221 crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2018_318115 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_14115 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13104 crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_dox001 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_017_4838_x crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12892 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000004813 crossref_primary_10_1590_S0102_67202014000300005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2020_10_052 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_14043 crossref_primary_10_1111_dote_12300 crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000001474 crossref_primary_10_1177_0194599817736507 crossref_primary_10_1272_jnms_JNMS_2019_86_608 crossref_primary_10_5041_RMMJ_10361 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13752 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000030206 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10067_018_4026_1 crossref_primary_10_5056_jnm21254 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2017_10_008 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12501 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12500 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_14914 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2016_06_021 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v22_i40_8991 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_021_02319_1 crossref_primary_10_1038_ajg_2013_428 crossref_primary_10_1590_s0004_2803_202000000_40 crossref_primary_10_3390_children7110215 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mpmed_2015_02_002 crossref_primary_10_5056_jnm15177 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2014_07_001 crossref_primary_10_2460_ajvr_77_8_818 crossref_primary_10_1152_ajpgi_00447_2013 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_14452 crossref_primary_10_5056_jnm20217 crossref_primary_10_1177_0194599816639249 crossref_primary_10_1111_nyas_13255 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13962 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13721 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13800 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2014_06_003 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12314 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12477 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00455_023_10655_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11894_017_0580_y crossref_primary_10_1002_adfm_202009289 crossref_primary_10_17235_reed_2016_4441_2016 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13918 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00535_019_01608_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13304_014_0261_4 crossref_primary_10_5056_jnm19142 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00455_023_10615_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_15284 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1636_5410_15_70946_3 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_14184 crossref_primary_10_1111_dote_12320 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13374 crossref_primary_10_1515_med_2018_0036 crossref_primary_10_4103_jbs_jbs_17_23 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13215 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_06921_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12887 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00535_014_1013_4 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12446 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12482 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1634_7358_15_70636_4 crossref_primary_10_1159_000540693 |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01834.x 10.1152/ajpgi.00444.2005 10.1152/ajpgi.00510.2005 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01830.x 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01713.x 10.1111/dote.12029 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01682.x 10.1136/gut.49.1.145 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01311.x 10.1152/ajpgi.00252.2007 10.1111/dote.12027 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd – notice: 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. – notice: Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7TK K9. 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1111/nmo.12167 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Neurosciences Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Neurosciences Abstracts MEDLINE ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1365-2982 |
EndPage | e579 |
ExternalDocumentID | 3034199421 23803156 10_1111_nmo_12167 NMO12167 |
Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 123 1OB 1OC 24P 29N 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHQN AAIPD AAKAS AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABOCM ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACUHS ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZCM ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFWVQ AFZJQ AHBTC AHEFC AHMBA AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ATUGU AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DTERQ DU5 EAD EAP EAS EBC EBD EBS EBX EJD EMB EMK EMOBN EPT ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 Q~Q R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TUS UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WIN WOHZO WOW WQJ WRC WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 YFH ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAYXX AEYWJ AGHNM AGQPQ AGYGG CITATION AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7TK K9. 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4527-a2fd17e32ffe529424e40e8433ea7e7ddf5ff6260d7a1b43e4395a841e3832d93 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 1350-1925 1365-2982 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 06:36:17 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 16:11:16 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 05:39:28 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:49:48 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:43:24 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:50:18 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:26:32 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 9 |
Keywords | high-resolution manometry (HRM) normal values esophagus |
Language | English |
License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4527-a2fd17e32ffe529424e40e8433ea7e7ddf5ff6260d7a1b43e4395a841e3832d93 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 23803156 |
PQID | 1416437255 |
PQPubID | 1006536 |
PageCount | 5 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1427013917 proquest_miscellaneous_1418147712 proquest_journals_1416437255 pubmed_primary_23803156 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_nmo_12167 crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12167 wiley_primary_10_1111_nmo_12167_NMO12167 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | September 2013 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2013 text: September 2013 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: Oxford |
PublicationTitle | Neurogastroenterology and motility |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Neurogastroenterol Motil |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | 2001; 49 2006; 290 2011; 23 2009; 21 2013 2007; 293 2012; 24 e_1_2_10_12_1 e_1_2_10_9_1 e_1_2_10_10_1 e_1_2_10_11_1 e_1_2_10_2_1 e_1_2_10_4_1 e_1_2_10_3_1 e_1_2_10_6_1 e_1_2_10_5_1 e_1_2_10_8_1 e_1_2_10_7_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 290 start-page: G988 year: 2006 end-page: 97 article-title: Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high‐resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers publication-title: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol – volume: 290 start-page: G1033 year: 2006 end-page: 40 article-title: Quantifying EGJ morphology and relaxation with high‐resolution manom‐etry; a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers publication-title: Am J Gastrointest Liver Physiol – year: 2013 article-title: Systematic analysis of esophageal pressure topography in high‐resolution manometry of 68 normal volunteers publication-title: Dis Esophagus – volume: 24 start-page: 57 issue: Suppl. 1 year: 2012 end-page: 65 article-title: Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography publication-title: Neurogastroenterol Motil – year: 2013 article-title: Influence of the catheter diameter on the investigation of the esophageal motility through solid‐state high‐resolution manometry publication-title: Dis Esophagus – volume: 23 start-page: 509 year: 2011 end-page: e198 article-title: Normative values and inter‐observer agreement for liquid and solid bolus swallows in upright and supine positions as assessed by esophageal high‐resolution manometry publication-title: Neurogastroenterol Motil – volume: 293 start-page: G878 year: 2007 end-page: 85 article-title: Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical oesophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls publication-title: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol – volume: 49 start-page: 145 year: 2001 end-page: 51 article-title: Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities publication-title: Gut – volume: 23 start-page: e271 year: 2011 end-page: 6 article-title: Reproducibility of esophageal high‐resolution manometry publication-title: Neurogastroenterol Motil – volume: 24 start-page: 5 issue: Suppl. 1 year: 2012 end-page: 10 article-title: Technical aspects of clinical high‐resolution manometry studies publication-title: Neurogastroenterol Motil – volume: 21 start-page: 796 year: 2009 end-page: 806 article-title: High‐resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities publication-title: Neurogastroenterol Motil – ident: e_1_2_10_7_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01834.x – ident: e_1_2_10_4_1 doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00444.2005 – ident: e_1_2_10_3_1 doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00510.2005 – ident: e_1_2_10_11_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01830.x – ident: e_1_2_10_6_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01713.x – ident: e_1_2_10_10_1 doi: 10.1111/dote.12029 – ident: e_1_2_10_9_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01682.x – ident: e_1_2_10_2_1 doi: 10.1136/gut.49.1.145 – ident: e_1_2_10_5_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01311.x – ident: e_1_2_10_8_1 doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00252.2007 – ident: e_1_2_10_12_1 doi: 10.1111/dote.12027 |
SSID | ssj0006246 |
Score | 2.338534 |
Snippet | Background
Esophageal high‐resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently... Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A... Background Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 762 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Catheters Esophageal Motility Disorders - diagnosis esophagus Esophagus - physiology Female high‐resolution manometry (HRM) Humans Male Manometry - instrumentation Manometry - methods Middle Aged Muscle Contraction - physiology Muscle, Smooth - physiology normal values Reference Values Young Adult |
Title | Normal values for esophageal high‐resolution manometry |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fnmo.12167 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23803156 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1416437255 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1418147712 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1427013917 |
Volume | 25 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LSwMxEA7Fg3jx0fqoVllFxMuWzWuzxVMRSxFaQRQ8CMs-shfbrfRxqCd_gr_RX-JM9qH1hXhbdidskskk3ySTbwg5BhDteHGL2hxWUxuWAGl7HIBcLLnmLOScRiZAtu92b8XlnbyrkLPiLkzGD1FuuKFlmPkaDTwIJx-MPB2OkBrBxZvkGKuFgOj6nTrKZdnNIi4dG1CMzFmFMIqnLLm4Fn0BmIt41Sw4nTVyX1Q1izN5aM6mYTN6-sTi-M-2rJPVHIha7WzkbJCKTquk1k7BCR_OrRPLhIaaPfcqWe7lJ_A14vUR5A4sJAnXEwsgr6UxEwJMS_AWyY9fn1_Ahc9HtDUM0tFQT8fzTXLbubg579p59gU7EpIpO2BJTBUoLEm0ZC3BhBaO9gTnOlBaxXEikwTdoVgFNBRcA7SRgSeoBqeXxS2-RZbSUap3iKXioAWlnEQrKhQ4eMqJnJAxJZE6x5V1clrowY9yanLMkDHwCxcFOsg3HVQnR6XoY8bH8Z1Qo1Cmn5vkBHwcag4pJfzusPwMxoQnJEGqRzMj40ENFWW_yTCFuJnCb7azgVLWBPAPZs1woUFG3T9X0e_3rszD7t9F98gKM8k4MMKtQZam45neB0g0DQ_M2H8DLuEEhg |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwEB7RRWq58Fgob0grhLgExa84K3FBiNVC2UVCIHFBUR7OpWwWLbsHOPET-I38EmacB4UCqnqLkrFiezz2N_b4G4AtBNFekLaYK3A1dXEJUG4gEMilShjBYyFYYgNke37nQh5fqssJ2KvuwhT8EPWGG1mGna_JwGlD-g8rz_sD4kbw9ReYpIze1qE6eyGP8nlxt0goz0Uco0peIYrjqYu-Xo3-gpivEatdctozcFVVtog0-b07HsW7yf0bHsf_bc0sTJdY1NkvBs8cTJi8CfP7Ofrh_Ttn27HRoXbbvQlfu-Uh_DwEPcK51w7xhJtbB1GvYygZAs5M-Jb4j58eHtGLLwe104_yQd-MhncLcNE-PD_ouGUCBjeRims34lnKNOosy4ziLcmlkZ4JpBAm0kanaaayjDyiVEcslsIgulFRIJlBv5enLfEdGvkgN0vg6DRqYSkvM5pJjT6e9hIv5lwrYs_x1TLsVIoIk5KdnJJkXIeVl4IdFNoOWoaftehNQcnxntBapc2wtMpbdHOYPadU-Lsf9We0JzokiXIzGFuZAGuoGf9MhmuCzgx_s1iMlLomCIEocYaPDbL6_riKYa97ah9W_l10E751zrsn4clR79cqTHGbm4MC3tagMRqOzToipFG8YQ3hGW-SCKE |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1JS8UwEB5cQLy471sVES-VZmv68CTqw_UpouBBKG2TXvT1yVsOevIn-Bv9JU7SxV3EW2knNMlkkm-SyTcA6wiivUDViMtwNXVxCRBuwBDIKcE0ozFjJLEBsg3_4IofXYvrPtgu78Lk_BDVhpuxDDtfGwO_V-k7I8-aLUON4Mt-GOS-F5ghvXfxxh3l0_xqEROeizBGFLRCJoynKvpxMfqCMD8CVrvi1EfhpqxrHmhyu9XrxlvJ4ycax382ZgxGCiTq7ORDZxz6dDYBkzsZeuHNB2fDsbGhdtN9AoZOiyP4SQgaBuXeOYYlXHccxLyONqkQcF7Ct4b9-OXpGX34Ykg7zShrNXW3_TAFV_X9y90Dt0i_4CZcUOlGNFVEosbSVAta45Rr7umAM6YjqaVSqUhT4w8pGZGYM43YRkQBJxq9XqpqbBoGslamZ8GRKqphKS_VknCJHp70Ei-mVArDneOLOdgs9RAmBTe5SZFxF5Y-CnZQaDtoDtYq0fuckOM7ocVSmWFhkx10cog9pRT4u9XqM1qTOSKJMt3qWZkAaygJ_U2GSgOcCf5mJh8oVU0QAJm0GT42yKr75yqGjdMz-zD_d9EVGDrfq4cnh43jBRimNjGHiXZbhIFuu6eXEB5142VrBq9qbgdZ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Normal+values+for+esophageal+high-resolution+manometry&rft.jtitle=Neurogastroenterology+and+motility&rft.au=Bogte%2C+A&rft.au=Bredenoord%2C+A+J&rft.au=Oors%2C+J&rft.au=Siersema%2C+P+D&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.eissn=1365-2982&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fnmo.12167&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F23803156&rft.externalDocID=23803156 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1350-1925&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1350-1925&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1350-1925&client=summon |