Normal values for esophageal high‐resolution manometry

Background Esophageal high‐resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile‐sensing catheter technology (Given Imag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeurogastroenterology and motility Vol. 25; no. 9; pp. 762 - e579
Main Authors Bogte, A., Bredenoord, A. J., Oors, J., Siersema, P. D., Smout, A. J. P. M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.09.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background Esophageal high‐resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile‐sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). We wished to determine normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor). Methods Fifty‐two healthy volunteers underwent supine HRM. Each subject swallowed 10 liquid water boluses. Esophageal contraction parameters were evaluated and normal values were calculated (defined as 5th and 95th percentile of values). Key Results The normal range for the following parameters was calculated; distal contractile integral (mean 1319.44, with a 5–95th percentile range [185.65–3407.60]), contractile front velocity (mean 3.98, 5–95th percentile range [2.40–6.50]), Intrabolus pressure (mean 9.68, range [1.00–19.00]), contraction amplitude measured 5 cm above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ; mean 78.76, range [23.00–146.00]), contraction amplitude 15 cm above the EGJ (mean 43.66, range [3.60–96.00]), transition zone (TZ) length (mean 1.34, range [0.00–5.63]), upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure (mean 81.63, range [19.50–165.10]), EGJ length (mean 2.97, range [2.17–4.00]), EGJ resting pressure (mean 29.35, range [8.95–51.40]), EGJ relaxation pressure (mean 16.79, range [1.00–39.35]), IRPs4 (mean 13.42, range [2.59–28.28]), and gastric pressure (mean 5.06, range [0.00–9.46]). Conclusions & Inferences Overall, the normal values of esophageal HRM parameters obtained with the Unisensor catheter resemble those of the previously published series. Marked differences in upper limits of normal were found for parameters related to the esophageal sphincters and TZ length. Users of HRM should be aware of these differences and define pathology based on comparison to appropriate normal values. Esophageal high‐resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile‐sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). In this article, normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor) were established.
AbstractList Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile-sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). We wished to determine normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor). Fifty-two healthy volunteers underwent supine HRM. Each subject swallowed 10 liquid water boluses. Esophageal contraction parameters were evaluated and normal values were calculated (defined as 5th and 95th percentile of values). The normal range for the following parameters was calculated; distal contractile integral (mean 1319.44, with a 5-95th percentile range [185.65-3407.60]), contractile front velocity (mean 3.98, 5-95th percentile range [2.40-6.50]), Intrabolus pressure (mean 9.68, range [1.00-19.00]), contraction amplitude measured 5 cm above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ; mean 78.76, range [23.00-146.00]), contraction amplitude 15 cm above the EGJ (mean 43.66, range [3.60-96.00]), transition zone (TZ) length (mean 1.34, range [0.00-5.63]), upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure (mean 81.63, range [19.50-165.10]), EGJ length (mean 2.97, range [2.17-4.00]), EGJ resting pressure (mean 29.35, range [8.95-51.40]), EGJ relaxation pressure (mean 16.79, range [1.00-39.35]), IRPs4 (mean 13.42, range [2.59-28.28]), and gastric pressure (mean 5.06, range [0.00-9.46]). Overall, the normal values of esophageal HRM parameters obtained with the Unisensor catheter resemble those of the previously published series. Marked differences in upper limits of normal were found for parameters related to the esophageal sphincters and TZ length. Users of HRM should be aware of these differences and define pathology based on comparison to appropriate normal values. Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile-sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). In this article, normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor) were established.
Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile-sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). We wished to determine normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor). Fifty-two healthy volunteers underwent supine HRM. Each subject swallowed 10 liquid water boluses. Esophageal contraction parameters were evaluated and normal values were calculated (defined as 5th and 95th percentile of values). The normal range for the following parameters was calculated; distal contractile integral (mean 1319.44, with a 5-95th percentile range [185.65-3407.60]), contractile front velocity (mean 3.98, 5-95th percentile range [2.40-6.50]), Intrabolus pressure (mean 9.68, range [1.00-19.00]), contraction amplitude measured 5 cm above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ; mean 78.76, range [23.00-146.00]), contraction amplitude 15 cm above the EGJ (mean 43.66, range [3.60-96.00]), transition zone (TZ) length (mean 1.34, range [0.00-5.63]), upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure (mean 81.63, range [19.50-165.10]), EGJ length (mean 2.97, range [2.17-4.00]), EGJ resting pressure (mean 29.35, range [8.95-51.40]), EGJ relaxation pressure (mean 16.79, range [1.00-39.35]), IRPs4 (mean 13.42, range [2.59-28.28]), and gastric pressure (mean 5.06, range [0.00-9.46]). Overall, the normal values of esophageal HRM parameters obtained with the Unisensor catheter resemble those of the previously published series. Marked differences in upper limits of normal were found for parameters related to the esophageal sphincters and TZ length. Users of HRM should be aware of these differences and define pathology based on comparison to appropriate normal values.
Background Esophageal high‐resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile‐sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). We wished to determine normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor). Methods Fifty‐two healthy volunteers underwent supine HRM. Each subject swallowed 10 liquid water boluses. Esophageal contraction parameters were evaluated and normal values were calculated (defined as 5th and 95th percentile of values). Key Results The normal range for the following parameters was calculated; distal contractile integral (mean 1319.44, with a 5–95th percentile range [185.65–3407.60]), contractile front velocity (mean 3.98, 5–95th percentile range [2.40–6.50]), Intrabolus pressure (mean 9.68, range [1.00–19.00]), contraction amplitude measured 5 cm above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ; mean 78.76, range [23.00–146.00]), contraction amplitude 15 cm above the EGJ (mean 43.66, range [3.60–96.00]), transition zone (TZ) length (mean 1.34, range [0.00–5.63]), upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure (mean 81.63, range [19.50–165.10]), EGJ length (mean 2.97, range [2.17–4.00]), EGJ resting pressure (mean 29.35, range [8.95–51.40]), EGJ relaxation pressure (mean 16.79, range [1.00–39.35]), IRPs4 (mean 13.42, range [2.59–28.28]), and gastric pressure (mean 5.06, range [0.00–9.46]). Conclusions & Inferences Overall, the normal values of esophageal HRM parameters obtained with the Unisensor catheter resemble those of the previously published series. Marked differences in upper limits of normal were found for parameters related to the esophageal sphincters and TZ length. Users of HRM should be aware of these differences and define pathology based on comparison to appropriate normal values. Esophageal high‐resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile‐sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). In this article, normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor) were established.
Background Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile-sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). We wished to determine normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor). Methods Fifty-two healthy volunteers underwent supine HRM. Each subject swallowed 10 liquid water boluses. Esophageal contraction parameters were evaluated and normal values were calculated (defined as 5th and 95th percentile of values). Key Results The normal range for the following parameters was calculated; distal contractile integral (mean 1319.44, with a 5-95th percentile range [185.65-3407.60]), contractile front velocity (mean 3.98, 5-95th percentile range [2.40-6.50]), Intrabolus pressure (mean 9.68, range [1.00-19.00]), contraction amplitude measured 5 cm above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ; mean 78.76, range [23.00-146.00]), contraction amplitude 15 cm above the EGJ (mean 43.66, range [3.60-96.00]), transition zone (TZ) length (mean 1.34, range [0.00-5.63]), upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure (mean 81.63, range [19.50-165.10]), EGJ length (mean 2.97, range [2.17-4.00]), EGJ resting pressure (mean 29.35, range [8.95-51.40]), EGJ relaxation pressure (mean 16.79, range [1.00-39.35]), IRPs4 (mean 13.42, range [2.59-28.28]), and gastric pressure (mean 5.06, range [0.00-9.46]). Conclusions & Inferences Overall, the normal values of esophageal HRM parameters obtained with the Unisensor catheter resemble those of the previously published series. Marked differences in upper limits of normal were found for parameters related to the esophageal sphincters and TZ length. Users of HRM should be aware of these differences and define pathology based on comparison to appropriate normal values [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT].
Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile-sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). We wished to determine normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor).BACKGROUNDEsophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile-sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). We wished to determine normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor).Fifty-two healthy volunteers underwent supine HRM. Each subject swallowed 10 liquid water boluses. Esophageal contraction parameters were evaluated and normal values were calculated (defined as 5th and 95th percentile of values).METHODSFifty-two healthy volunteers underwent supine HRM. Each subject swallowed 10 liquid water boluses. Esophageal contraction parameters were evaluated and normal values were calculated (defined as 5th and 95th percentile of values).The normal range for the following parameters was calculated; distal contractile integral (mean 1319.44, with a 5-95th percentile range [185.65-3407.60]), contractile front velocity (mean 3.98, 5-95th percentile range [2.40-6.50]), Intrabolus pressure (mean 9.68, range [1.00-19.00]), contraction amplitude measured 5 cm above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ; mean 78.76, range [23.00-146.00]), contraction amplitude 15 cm above the EGJ (mean 43.66, range [3.60-96.00]), transition zone (TZ) length (mean 1.34, range [0.00-5.63]), upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure (mean 81.63, range [19.50-165.10]), EGJ length (mean 2.97, range [2.17-4.00]), EGJ resting pressure (mean 29.35, range [8.95-51.40]), EGJ relaxation pressure (mean 16.79, range [1.00-39.35]), IRPs4 (mean 13.42, range [2.59-28.28]), and gastric pressure (mean 5.06, range [0.00-9.46]).KEY RESULTSThe normal range for the following parameters was calculated; distal contractile integral (mean 1319.44, with a 5-95th percentile range [185.65-3407.60]), contractile front velocity (mean 3.98, 5-95th percentile range [2.40-6.50]), Intrabolus pressure (mean 9.68, range [1.00-19.00]), contraction amplitude measured 5 cm above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ; mean 78.76, range [23.00-146.00]), contraction amplitude 15 cm above the EGJ (mean 43.66, range [3.60-96.00]), transition zone (TZ) length (mean 1.34, range [0.00-5.63]), upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure (mean 81.63, range [19.50-165.10]), EGJ length (mean 2.97, range [2.17-4.00]), EGJ resting pressure (mean 29.35, range [8.95-51.40]), EGJ relaxation pressure (mean 16.79, range [1.00-39.35]), IRPs4 (mean 13.42, range [2.59-28.28]), and gastric pressure (mean 5.06, range [0.00-9.46]).Overall, the normal values of esophageal HRM parameters obtained with the Unisensor catheter resemble those of the previously published series. Marked differences in upper limits of normal were found for parameters related to the esophageal sphincters and TZ length. Users of HRM should be aware of these differences and define pathology based on comparison to appropriate normal values.CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCESOverall, the normal values of esophageal HRM parameters obtained with the Unisensor catheter resemble those of the previously published series. Marked differences in upper limits of normal were found for parameters related to the esophageal sphincters and TZ length. Users of HRM should be aware of these differences and define pathology based on comparison to appropriate normal values.
Author Bredenoord, A. J.
Bogte, A.
Siersema, P. D.
Oors, J.
Smout, A. J. P. M.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: A.
  surname: Bogte
  fullname: Bogte, A.
  organization: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
– sequence: 2
  givenname: A. J.
  surname: Bredenoord
  fullname: Bredenoord, A. J.
  organization: Academic Medical Center
– sequence: 3
  givenname: J.
  surname: Oors
  fullname: Oors, J.
  organization: Academic Medical Center
– sequence: 4
  givenname: P. D.
  surname: Siersema
  fullname: Siersema, P. D.
  organization: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
– sequence: 5
  givenname: A. J. P. M.
  surname: Smout
  fullname: Smout, A. J. P. M.
  organization: Academic Medical Center
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23803156$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkctOwzAQRS1UxHvBD6BKbGAR6vEjTpYI8ZKAbmBtuc2YBiVxsRNQd3wC38iX4NJ2U4HEbDwanXs1nrtLeo1rkJBDoGcQa9DU7gwYpGqD7ABPZcLyjPXmvaQJ5Exuk90QXiilKRPpFtlmPKMcZLpDsgfna1P130zVYehb5_sY3HRinjFOJ-Xz5Ovj08dR1bWla_q1aVyNrZ_tk01rqoAHy3ePPF1dPl7cJHfD69uL87tkLCRTiWG2AIWcWYuS5YIJFBQzwTkahaoorLQ2ZSktlIGR4Ch4Lk0mAHnGWZHzPXKy8J169xpXbHVdhjFWlWnQdUGDYIoCz0H9A4UMhFLAInq8hr64zjfxI3MqFVwxKSN1tKS6UY2FnvqyNn6mV-eLwGABjL0LwaPV47I180O13pSVBqrnAekYkP4JKCpO1xQr09_Ypft7WeHsb1A_3A8Xim_xjp3x
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_14193
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00455_016_9743_5
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13221
crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2018_318115
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_14115
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13104
crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_dox001
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_017_4838_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12892
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000004813
crossref_primary_10_1590_S0102_67202014000300005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2020_10_052
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_14043
crossref_primary_10_1111_dote_12300
crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000001474
crossref_primary_10_1177_0194599817736507
crossref_primary_10_1272_jnms_JNMS_2019_86_608
crossref_primary_10_5041_RMMJ_10361
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13752
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000030206
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10067_018_4026_1
crossref_primary_10_5056_jnm21254
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2017_10_008
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12501
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12500
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_14914
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2016_06_021
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v22_i40_8991
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_021_02319_1
crossref_primary_10_1038_ajg_2013_428
crossref_primary_10_1590_s0004_2803_202000000_40
crossref_primary_10_3390_children7110215
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mpmed_2015_02_002
crossref_primary_10_5056_jnm15177
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2014_07_001
crossref_primary_10_2460_ajvr_77_8_818
crossref_primary_10_1152_ajpgi_00447_2013
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_14452
crossref_primary_10_5056_jnm20217
crossref_primary_10_1177_0194599816639249
crossref_primary_10_1111_nyas_13255
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13962
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13721
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13800
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2014_06_003
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12314
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12477
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00455_023_10655_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11894_017_0580_y
crossref_primary_10_1002_adfm_202009289
crossref_primary_10_17235_reed_2016_4441_2016
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13918
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00535_019_01608_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13304_014_0261_4
crossref_primary_10_5056_jnm19142
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00455_023_10615_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_15284
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1636_5410_15_70946_3
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_14184
crossref_primary_10_1111_dote_12320
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13374
crossref_primary_10_1515_med_2018_0036
crossref_primary_10_4103_jbs_jbs_17_23
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_13215
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_06921_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12887
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00535_014_1013_4
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12446
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12482
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1634_7358_15_70636_4
crossref_primary_10_1159_000540693
Cites_doi 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01834.x
10.1152/ajpgi.00444.2005
10.1152/ajpgi.00510.2005
10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01830.x
10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01713.x
10.1111/dote.12029
10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01682.x
10.1136/gut.49.1.145
10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01311.x
10.1152/ajpgi.00252.2007
10.1111/dote.12027
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Copyright_xml – notice: 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
– notice: 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7TK
K9.
7X8
DOI 10.1111/nmo.12167
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE

ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1365-2982
EndPage e579
ExternalDocumentID 3034199421
23803156
10_1111_nmo_12167
NMO12167
Genre article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
123
1OB
1OC
24P
29N
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAKAS
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABOCM
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACUHS
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZCM
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHEFC
AHMBA
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ATUGU
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DTERQ
DU5
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBC
EBD
EBS
EBX
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
EPT
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
Q~Q
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TUS
UB1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WIN
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
YFH
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAYXX
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGYGG
CITATION
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7TK
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4527-a2fd17e32ffe529424e40e8433ea7e7ddf5ff6260d7a1b43e4395a841e3832d93
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 1350-1925
1365-2982
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 06:36:17 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 16:11:16 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 05:39:28 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:49:48 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:43:24 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:50:18 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:26:32 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 9
Keywords high-resolution manometry (HRM)
normal values
esophagus
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4527-a2fd17e32ffe529424e40e8433ea7e7ddf5ff6260d7a1b43e4395a841e3832d93
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 23803156
PQID 1416437255
PQPubID 1006536
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1427013917
proquest_miscellaneous_1418147712
proquest_journals_1416437255
pubmed_primary_23803156
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_nmo_12167
crossref_primary_10_1111_nmo_12167
wiley_primary_10_1111_nmo_12167_NMO12167
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate September 2013
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2013
  text: September 2013
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle Neurogastroenterology and motility
PublicationTitleAlternate Neurogastroenterol Motil
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 2001; 49
2006; 290
2011; 23
2009; 21
2013
2007; 293
2012; 24
e_1_2_10_12_1
e_1_2_10_9_1
e_1_2_10_10_1
e_1_2_10_11_1
e_1_2_10_2_1
e_1_2_10_4_1
e_1_2_10_3_1
e_1_2_10_6_1
e_1_2_10_5_1
e_1_2_10_8_1
e_1_2_10_7_1
References_xml – volume: 290
  start-page: G988
  year: 2006
  end-page: 97
  article-title: Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high‐resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers
  publication-title: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
– volume: 290
  start-page: G1033
  year: 2006
  end-page: 40
  article-title: Quantifying EGJ morphology and relaxation with high‐resolution manom‐etry; a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers
  publication-title: Am J Gastrointest Liver Physiol
– year: 2013
  article-title: Systematic analysis of esophageal pressure topography in high‐resolution manometry of 68 normal volunteers
  publication-title: Dis Esophagus
– volume: 24
  start-page: 57
  issue: Suppl. 1
  year: 2012
  end-page: 65
  article-title: Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography
  publication-title: Neurogastroenterol Motil
– year: 2013
  article-title: Influence of the catheter diameter on the investigation of the esophageal motility through solid‐state high‐resolution manometry
  publication-title: Dis Esophagus
– volume: 23
  start-page: 509
  year: 2011
  end-page: e198
  article-title: Normative values and inter‐observer agreement for liquid and solid bolus swallows in upright and supine positions as assessed by esophageal high‐resolution manometry
  publication-title: Neurogastroenterol Motil
– volume: 293
  start-page: G878
  year: 2007
  end-page: 85
  article-title: Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical oesophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls
  publication-title: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
– volume: 49
  start-page: 145
  year: 2001
  end-page: 51
  article-title: Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities
  publication-title: Gut
– volume: 23
  start-page: e271
  year: 2011
  end-page: 6
  article-title: Reproducibility of esophageal high‐resolution manometry
  publication-title: Neurogastroenterol Motil
– volume: 24
  start-page: 5
  issue: Suppl. 1
  year: 2012
  end-page: 10
  article-title: Technical aspects of clinical high‐resolution manometry studies
  publication-title: Neurogastroenterol Motil
– volume: 21
  start-page: 796
  year: 2009
  end-page: 806
  article-title: High‐resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities
  publication-title: Neurogastroenterol Motil
– ident: e_1_2_10_7_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01834.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_4_1
  doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00444.2005
– ident: e_1_2_10_3_1
  doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00510.2005
– ident: e_1_2_10_11_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01830.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_6_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01713.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_10_1
  doi: 10.1111/dote.12029
– ident: e_1_2_10_9_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01682.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_2_1
  doi: 10.1136/gut.49.1.145
– ident: e_1_2_10_5_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01311.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_8_1
  doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00252.2007
– ident: e_1_2_10_12_1
  doi: 10.1111/dote.12027
SSID ssj0006246
Score 2.338534
Snippet Background Esophageal high‐resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently...
Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A...
Background Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 762
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Catheters
Esophageal Motility Disorders - diagnosis
esophagus
Esophagus - physiology
Female
high‐resolution manometry (HRM)
Humans
Male
Manometry - instrumentation
Manometry - methods
Middle Aged
Muscle Contraction - physiology
Muscle, Smooth - physiology
normal values
Reference Values
Young Adult
Title Normal values for esophageal high‐resolution manometry
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fnmo.12167
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23803156
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1416437255
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1418147712
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1427013917
Volume 25
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LSwMxEA7Fg3jx0fqoVllFxMuWzWuzxVMRSxFaQRQ8CMs-shfbrfRxqCd_gr_RX-JM9qH1hXhbdidskskk3ySTbwg5BhDteHGL2hxWUxuWAGl7HIBcLLnmLOScRiZAtu92b8XlnbyrkLPiLkzGD1FuuKFlmPkaDTwIJx-MPB2OkBrBxZvkGKuFgOj6nTrKZdnNIi4dG1CMzFmFMIqnLLm4Fn0BmIt41Sw4nTVyX1Q1izN5aM6mYTN6-sTi-M-2rJPVHIha7WzkbJCKTquk1k7BCR_OrRPLhIaaPfcqWe7lJ_A14vUR5A4sJAnXEwsgr6UxEwJMS_AWyY9fn1_Ahc9HtDUM0tFQT8fzTXLbubg579p59gU7EpIpO2BJTBUoLEm0ZC3BhBaO9gTnOlBaxXEikwTdoVgFNBRcA7SRgSeoBqeXxS2-RZbSUap3iKXioAWlnEQrKhQ4eMqJnJAxJZE6x5V1clrowY9yanLMkDHwCxcFOsg3HVQnR6XoY8bH8Z1Qo1Cmn5vkBHwcag4pJfzusPwMxoQnJEGqRzMj40ENFWW_yTCFuJnCb7azgVLWBPAPZs1woUFG3T9X0e_3rszD7t9F98gKM8k4MMKtQZam45neB0g0DQ_M2H8DLuEEhg
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwEB7RRWq58Fgob0grhLgExa84K3FBiNVC2UVCIHFBUR7OpWwWLbsHOPET-I38EmacB4UCqnqLkrFiezz2N_b4G4AtBNFekLaYK3A1dXEJUG4gEMilShjBYyFYYgNke37nQh5fqssJ2KvuwhT8EPWGG1mGna_JwGlD-g8rz_sD4kbw9ReYpIze1qE6eyGP8nlxt0goz0Uco0peIYrjqYu-Xo3-gpivEatdctozcFVVtog0-b07HsW7yf0bHsf_bc0sTJdY1NkvBs8cTJi8CfP7Ofrh_Ttn27HRoXbbvQlfu-Uh_DwEPcK51w7xhJtbB1GvYygZAs5M-Jb4j58eHtGLLwe104_yQd-MhncLcNE-PD_ouGUCBjeRims34lnKNOosy4ziLcmlkZ4JpBAm0kanaaayjDyiVEcslsIgulFRIJlBv5enLfEdGvkgN0vg6DRqYSkvM5pJjT6e9hIv5lwrYs_x1TLsVIoIk5KdnJJkXIeVl4IdFNoOWoaftehNQcnxntBapc2wtMpbdHOYPadU-Lsf9We0JzokiXIzGFuZAGuoGf9MhmuCzgx_s1iMlLomCIEocYaPDbL6_riKYa97ah9W_l10E751zrsn4clR79cqTHGbm4MC3tagMRqOzToipFG8YQ3hGW-SCKE
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1JS8UwEB5cQLy471sVES-VZmv68CTqw_UpouBBKG2TXvT1yVsOevIn-Bv9JU7SxV3EW2knNMlkkm-SyTcA6wiivUDViMtwNXVxCRBuwBDIKcE0ozFjJLEBsg3_4IofXYvrPtgu78Lk_BDVhpuxDDtfGwO_V-k7I8-aLUON4Mt-GOS-F5ghvXfxxh3l0_xqEROeizBGFLRCJoynKvpxMfqCMD8CVrvi1EfhpqxrHmhyu9XrxlvJ4ycax382ZgxGCiTq7ORDZxz6dDYBkzsZeuHNB2fDsbGhdtN9AoZOiyP4SQgaBuXeOYYlXHccxLyONqkQcF7Ct4b9-OXpGX34Ykg7zShrNXW3_TAFV_X9y90Dt0i_4CZcUOlGNFVEosbSVAta45Rr7umAM6YjqaVSqUhT4w8pGZGYM43YRkQBJxq9XqpqbBoGslamZ8GRKqphKS_VknCJHp70Ei-mVArDneOLOdgs9RAmBTe5SZFxF5Y-CnZQaDtoDtYq0fuckOM7ocVSmWFhkx10cog9pRT4u9XqM1qTOSKJMt3qWZkAaygJ_U2GSgOcCf5mJh8oVU0QAJm0GT42yKr75yqGjdMz-zD_d9EVGDrfq4cnh43jBRimNjGHiXZbhIFuu6eXEB5142VrBq9qbgdZ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Normal+values+for+esophageal+high-resolution+manometry&rft.jtitle=Neurogastroenterology+and+motility&rft.au=Bogte%2C+A&rft.au=Bredenoord%2C+A+J&rft.au=Oors%2C+J&rft.au=Siersema%2C+P+D&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.eissn=1365-2982&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fnmo.12167&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F23803156&rft.externalDocID=23803156
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1350-1925&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1350-1925&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1350-1925&client=summon