Reliable eDNA detection and quantification of the European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis)
The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic population collapses across its native range to the point of regional extinction. Although environmental DNA (eDNA)‐based approaches offer cle...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of fish biology Vol. 98; no. 2; pp. 399 - 414 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.02.2021
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic population collapses across its native range to the point of regional extinction. Although environmental DNA (eDNA)‐based approaches offer clear advantages over conventional field methods for monitoring rare and endangered species, accurate detection and quantification remain difficult and quality assessment is often poorly incorporated. In this study, we developed and validated a novel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) eDNA‐based method for reliable detection and quantification, which allows accurate monitoring of M. fossilis across a number of habitat types. A dilution experiment under laboratory conditions allowed the definition of the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ), which were set at concentrations of 0.07 and 0.14 copies μl–1, respectively. A series of aquarium experiments revealed a significant and positive relationship between the number of individuals and the eDNA concentration measured. During a 3 year survey (2017–2019), we assessed 96 locations for the presence of M. fossilis in Flanders (Belgium). eDNA analyses on these samples highlighted 45% positive detections of the species. On the basis of the eDNA concentration per litre of water, only 12 sites appeared to harbour relatively dense populations. The other 31 sites gave a relatively weak positive signal that was typically situated below the LOQ. Combining sample‐specific estimates of effective DNA quantity (Qe) and conventional field sampling, we concluded that each of these weak positive sites still likely harboured the species and therefore they do not represent false positives. Further, only seven of the classified negative samples warrant additional sampling as our analyses identified a substantial risk of false‐negative detections (i.e., type II errors) at these locations. Finally, we illustrated that ddPCR outcompetes conventional qPCR analyses, especially when target DNA concentrations are critically low, which could be attributed to a reduced sensitivity of ddPCR to inhibition effects, higher sample concentrations being accommodated and higher sensitivity obtained. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic population collapses across its native range to the point of regional extinction. Although environmental DNA (eDNA)‐based approaches offer clear advantages over conventional field methods for monitoring rare and endangered species, accurate detection and quantification remain difficult and quality assessment is often poorly incorporated. In this study, we developed and validated a novel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) eDNA‐based method for reliable detection and quantification, which allows accurate monitoring of M. fossilis across a number of habitat types. A dilution experiment under laboratory conditions allowed the definition of the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ), which were set at concentrations of 0.07 and 0.14 copies μl–1, respectively. A series of aquarium experiments revealed a significant and positive relationship between the number of individuals and the eDNA concentration measured. During a 3 year survey (2017–2019), we assessed 96 locations for the presence of M. fossilis in Flanders (Belgium). eDNA analyses on these samples highlighted 45% positive detections of the species. On the basis of the eDNA concentration per litre of water, only 12 sites appeared to harbour relatively dense populations. The other 31 sites gave a relatively weak positive signal that was typically situated below the LOQ. Combining sample‐specific estimates of effective DNA quantity (Qe) and conventional field sampling, we concluded that each of these weak positive sites still likely harboured the species and therefore they do not represent false positives. Further, only seven of the classified negative samples warrant additional sampling as our analyses identified a substantial risk of false‐negative detections (i.e., type II errors) at these locations. Finally, we illustrated that ddPCR outcompetes conventional qPCR analyses, especially when target DNA concentrations are critically low, which could be attributed to a reduced sensitivity of ddPCR to inhibition effects, higher sample concentrations being accommodated and higher sensitivity obtained. The European weather loach ( Misgurnus fossilis ) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic population collapses across its native range to the point of regional extinction. Although environmental DNA (eDNA)‐based approaches offer clear advantages over conventional field methods for monitoring rare and endangered species, accurate detection and quantification remain difficult and quality assessment is often poorly incorporated. In this study, we developed and validated a novel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) eDNA‐based method for reliable detection and quantification, which allows accurate monitoring of M. fossilis across a number of habitat types. A dilution experiment under laboratory conditions allowed the definition of the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ), which were set at concentrations of 0.07 and 0.14 copies μl –1 , respectively. A series of aquarium experiments revealed a significant and positive relationship between the number of individuals and the eDNA concentration measured. During a 3 year survey (2017–2019), we assessed 96 locations for the presence of M. fossilis in Flanders (Belgium). eDNA analyses on these samples highlighted 45% positive detections of the species. On the basis of the eDNA concentration per litre of water, only 12 sites appeared to harbour relatively dense populations. The other 31 sites gave a relatively weak positive signal that was typically situated below the LOQ. Combining sample‐specific estimates of effective DNA quantity ( Q e ) and conventional field sampling, we concluded that each of these weak positive sites still likely harboured the species and therefore they do not represent false positives. Further, only seven of the classified negative samples warrant additional sampling as our analyses identified a substantial risk of false‐negative detections ( i.e. , type II errors) at these locations. Finally, we illustrated that ddPCR outcompetes conventional qPCR analyses, especially when target DNA concentrations are critically low, which could be attributed to a reduced sensitivity of ddPCR to inhibition effects, higher sample concentrations being accommodated and higher sensitivity obtained. The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic population collapses across its native range to the point of regional extinction. Although environmental DNA (eDNA)‐based approaches offer clear advantages over conventional field methods for monitoring rare and endangered species, accurate detection and quantification remain difficult and quality assessment is often poorly incorporated. In this study, we developed and validated a novel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) eDNA‐based method for reliable detection and quantification, which allows accurate monitoring of M. fossilis across a number of habitat types. A dilution experiment under laboratory conditions allowed the definition of the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ), which were set at concentrations of 0.07 and 0.14 copies μl–¹, respectively. A series of aquarium experiments revealed a significant and positive relationship between the number of individuals and the eDNA concentration measured. During a 3 year survey (2017–2019), we assessed 96 locations for the presence of M. fossilis in Flanders (Belgium). eDNA analyses on these samples highlighted 45% positive detections of the species. On the basis of the eDNA concentration per litre of water, only 12 sites appeared to harbour relatively dense populations. The other 31 sites gave a relatively weak positive signal that was typically situated below the LOQ. Combining sample‐specific estimates of effective DNA quantity (Qₑ) and conventional field sampling, we concluded that each of these weak positive sites still likely harboured the species and therefore they do not represent false positives. Further, only seven of the classified negative samples warrant additional sampling as our analyses identified a substantial risk of false‐negative detections (i.e., type II errors) at these locations. Finally, we illustrated that ddPCR outcompetes conventional qPCR analyses, especially when target DNA concentrations are critically low, which could be attributed to a reduced sensitivity of ddPCR to inhibition effects, higher sample concentrations being accommodated and higher sensitivity obtained. The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic population collapses across its native range to the point of regional extinction. Although environmental DNA (eDNA)-based approaches offer clear advantages over conventional field methods for monitoring rare and endangered species, accurate detection and quantification remain difficult and quality assessment is often poorly incorporated. In this study, we developed and validated a novel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) eDNA-based method for reliable detection and quantification, which allows accurate monitoring of M. fossilis across a number of habitat types. A dilution experiment under laboratory conditions allowed the definition of the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ), which were set at concentrations of 0.07 and 0.14 copies μl-1 , respectively. A series of aquarium experiments revealed a significant and positive relationship between the number of individuals and the eDNA concentration measured. During a 3 year survey (2017-2019), we assessed 96 locations for the presence of M. fossilis in Flanders (Belgium). eDNA analyses on these samples highlighted 45% positive detections of the species. On the basis of the eDNA concentration per litre of water, only 12 sites appeared to harbour relatively dense populations. The other 31 sites gave a relatively weak positive signal that was typically situated below the LOQ. Combining sample-specific estimates of effective DNA quantity (Qe ) and conventional field sampling, we concluded that each of these weak positive sites still likely harboured the species and therefore they do not represent false positives. Further, only seven of the classified negative samples warrant additional sampling as our analyses identified a substantial risk of false-negative detections (i.e., type II errors) at these locations. Finally, we illustrated that ddPCR outcompetes conventional qPCR analyses, especially when target DNA concentrations are critically low, which could be attributed to a reduced sensitivity of ddPCR to inhibition effects, higher sample concentrations being accommodated and higher sensitivity obtained.The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic population collapses across its native range to the point of regional extinction. Although environmental DNA (eDNA)-based approaches offer clear advantages over conventional field methods for monitoring rare and endangered species, accurate detection and quantification remain difficult and quality assessment is often poorly incorporated. In this study, we developed and validated a novel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) eDNA-based method for reliable detection and quantification, which allows accurate monitoring of M. fossilis across a number of habitat types. A dilution experiment under laboratory conditions allowed the definition of the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ), which were set at concentrations of 0.07 and 0.14 copies μl-1 , respectively. A series of aquarium experiments revealed a significant and positive relationship between the number of individuals and the eDNA concentration measured. During a 3 year survey (2017-2019), we assessed 96 locations for the presence of M. fossilis in Flanders (Belgium). eDNA analyses on these samples highlighted 45% positive detections of the species. On the basis of the eDNA concentration per litre of water, only 12 sites appeared to harbour relatively dense populations. The other 31 sites gave a relatively weak positive signal that was typically situated below the LOQ. Combining sample-specific estimates of effective DNA quantity (Qe ) and conventional field sampling, we concluded that each of these weak positive sites still likely harboured the species and therefore they do not represent false positives. Further, only seven of the classified negative samples warrant additional sampling as our analyses identified a substantial risk of false-negative detections (i.e., type II errors) at these locations. Finally, we illustrated that ddPCR outcompetes conventional qPCR analyses, especially when target DNA concentrations are critically low, which could be attributed to a reduced sensitivity of ddPCR to inhibition effects, higher sample concentrations being accommodated and higher sensitivity obtained. The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic population collapses across its native range to the point of regional extinction. Although environmental DNA (eDNA)-based approaches offer clear advantages over conventional field methods for monitoring rare and endangered species, accurate detection and quantification remain difficult and quality assessment is often poorly incorporated. In this study, we developed and validated a novel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) eDNA-based method for reliable detection and quantification, which allows accurate monitoring of M. fossilis across a number of habitat types. A dilution experiment under laboratory conditions allowed the definition of the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ), which were set at concentrations of 0.07 and 0.14 copies μl , respectively. A series of aquarium experiments revealed a significant and positive relationship between the number of individuals and the eDNA concentration measured. During a 3 year survey (2017-2019), we assessed 96 locations for the presence of M. fossilis in Flanders (Belgium). eDNA analyses on these samples highlighted 45% positive detections of the species. On the basis of the eDNA concentration per litre of water, only 12 sites appeared to harbour relatively dense populations. The other 31 sites gave a relatively weak positive signal that was typically situated below the LOQ. Combining sample-specific estimates of effective DNA quantity (Q ) and conventional field sampling, we concluded that each of these weak positive sites still likely harboured the species and therefore they do not represent false positives. Further, only seven of the classified negative samples warrant additional sampling as our analyses identified a substantial risk of false-negative detections (i.e., type II errors) at these locations. Finally, we illustrated that ddPCR outcompetes conventional qPCR analyses, especially when target DNA concentrations are critically low, which could be attributed to a reduced sensitivity of ddPCR to inhibition effects, higher sample concentrations being accommodated and higher sensitivity obtained. |
Author | Sweet, Michael Brys, Rein Mergeay, Joachim Neyrinck, Sabrina Mauvisseau, Quentin Halfmaerten, David Auwerx, Johan |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Rein orcidid: 0000-0002-0688-3268 surname: Brys fullname: Brys, Rein email: rein.brys@inbo.be organization: Research Institute for Nature and Forest – sequence: 2 givenname: David surname: Halfmaerten fullname: Halfmaerten, David organization: Research Institute for Nature and Forest – sequence: 3 givenname: Sabrina surname: Neyrinck fullname: Neyrinck, Sabrina organization: Research Institute for Nature and Forest – sequence: 4 givenname: Quentin surname: Mauvisseau fullname: Mauvisseau, Quentin organization: SureScreen Scientifics Ltd – sequence: 5 givenname: Johan surname: Auwerx fullname: Auwerx, Johan organization: Research Institute for Nature and Forest – sequence: 6 givenname: Michael surname: Sweet fullname: Sweet, Michael organization: SureScreen Scientifics Ltd – sequence: 7 givenname: Joachim surname: Mergeay fullname: Mergeay, Joachim organization: Research Institute for Nature and Forest |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32154579$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkV9PFDEUxRuDkQV98AuYJr7Aw0D_bttHRBAMamL00TR3O7fSTXdmmc6E8O0tu8sL0Xhfmtv8zknuOQdkr-s7JOQtZye8zukyLk64kly_IDPOnG7sXLk9MmNMiKYCYp8clLJkjDnp5CuyLwXXShs3I7--Y06wyEjx49cz2uKIYUx9R6Fr6d0E3ZhiCrD56iMdb5FeTEO_RujoPULdB5p7CLf06Esqv6ehmwqNfSkpp3L8mryMkAu-2b2H5OflxY_zq-bm26fr87ObJigtdBOCbaW2qFQwzmojWmGjmIfYysBUsADazEGhDg4BIFoJLGoEgbyVhgl5SI62vuuhv5uwjH6VSsCcocN-Kl4YbqW0nPH_o9Joa6R0qqLvn6HLvh5YD_FCWculM_rR8N2OmhYrbP16SCsYHvxTxhU43QJhqLkMGH1I4ybRcYCUPWf-sUVfW_SbFqvi-JniyfRv7M79PmV8-DfoP19-2Cr-ACUWqgw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e17102 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_7382 crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_426 crossref_primary_10_3390_d15050631 crossref_primary_10_3390_w13081113 crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_301 crossref_primary_10_1002_lom3_10634 crossref_primary_10_11609_jott_7837_14_5_21102_21116 crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_501 crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_589 crossref_primary_10_3897_neobiota_69_67708 crossref_primary_10_1051_e3sconf_202344201021 crossref_primary_10_1002_aqc_4072 crossref_primary_10_3390_w17050661 crossref_primary_10_1139_gen_2023_0008 crossref_primary_10_1002_aqc_4111 crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2020_612253 crossref_primary_10_1111_cobi_13849 crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_394 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_10807 crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_351 crossref_primary_10_1111_jfb_14660 crossref_primary_10_1088_1742_6596_2353_1_012010 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_90771_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envadv_2021_100163 crossref_primary_10_1111_ecog_07347 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fishres_2023_106708 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envres_2023_115857 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pwat_0000066 crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_188 crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_420 crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_260 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_8372 crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2022_725360 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_149175 crossref_primary_10_1111_1755_0998_14076 crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_70036 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_025_03033_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envadv_2023_100370 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_15210 crossref_primary_10_3390_fishes8010041 crossref_primary_10_1111_jfb_14218 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11160_022_09741_8 crossref_primary_10_1111_1755_0998_13703 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2023_166675 crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2023_1025105 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0272660 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00227_023_04193_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00227_025_04609_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10661_024_12788_8 crossref_primary_10_3390_biology10090899 crossref_primary_10_3390_biology10121223 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmars_2023_1061530 crossref_primary_10_3897_neobiota_79_82793 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_14679 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_172281 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani15020285 crossref_primary_10_1002_aqc_4245 crossref_primary_10_1111_1755_0998_13839 crossref_primary_10_1002_aqc_3916 crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_200 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2023_110125 crossref_primary_10_1111_ddi_13284 |
Cites_doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0058316 10.1021/acs.est.5b00253 10.1111/1755-0998.12483 10.1111/2041-210X.12206 10.1002/edn3.23 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.023 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199 10.1111/faf.12373 10.1371/journal.pone.0179261 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062306 10.3354/dao02423 10.1038/s41598-018-37001-y 10.1023/A:1007681313916 10.1111/1755-0998.13055 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00190-3 10.1002/nafm.10055 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00158.x 10.1111/2041-210X.12595 10.1890/02-3090 10.1111/1755-0998.12735 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0118 10.3996/042014-JFWM-034 10.3389/fmars.2018.00133 10.1139/gen-2015-0218 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05600.x 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.05.008 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01000.x 10.1111/2041-210X.12683 10.1371/journal.pone.0157366 10.1038/s41598-019-50571-9 10.1071/MF14346 10.1016/j.bdq.2017.04.001 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T40698A10351495.en 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01098.x 10.1016/j.aquatox.2016.12.006 10.1111/1365-2664.12262 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05418.x 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2248:ESORWD]2.0.CO;2 10.1021/ac202028g 10.1080/02705060.2013.810555 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.370 10.1186/s13071-018-2916-3 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00061 10.1371/journal.pone.0162277 10.1007/s10641-009-9564-6 10.1016/j.envres.2011.02.001 10.1371/journal.pone.0112611 10.1586/14737159.2014.901154 10.1111/1365-2664.12306 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.023 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2020 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles 2020 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles. Journal of Fish Biology © 2021 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles – notice: 2020 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles. – notice: Journal of Fish Biology © 2021 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7SN 7TN 8FD C1K F1W FR3 H95 L.G P64 RC3 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
DOI | 10.1111/jfb.14315 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Animal Behavior Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Engineering Research Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Genetics Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Technology Research Database Animal Behavior Abstracts ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Engineering Research Database Ecology Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional CrossRef AGRICOLA MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Zoology |
EISSN | 1095-8649 |
EndPage | 414 |
ExternalDocumentID | 32154579 10_1111_jfb_14315 JFB14315 |
Genre | article Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | Belgium |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Belgium |
GroupedDBID | --- --K -~X .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1B1 1OB 1OC 29K 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHBH AAHHS AAHQN AAJYS AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABPPZ ABPVW ABTAH ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AHBTC AHEFC AI. AIAGR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AUFTA AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BGJEQ BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 CAG COF CS3 D-E D-F D-I DC6 DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM DU5 EBS ECGQY EJD ESX F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LG5 LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ NQ- O66 O9- OIG P2P P2W P2X P4D PALCI Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RPZ RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TN5 TWZ UB1 UPT V8K VH1 W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WIH WIK WOHZO WQJ WRC WUPDE WXSBR WYISQ XG1 XOL XPP YK3 YQT ZCG ZMT ZY4 ZZTAW ~02 ~IA ~WT AAYXX AEYWJ AGHNM AGQPQ AGYGG CITATION AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7SN 7TN 8FD C1K F1W FR3 H95 L.G P64 RC3 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4525-cc8d358e44c798572d28f26cfd3c04c8aa576a4e5c9eaaaf83a0f5ea2e1d37023 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0022-1112 1095-8649 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 18:25:26 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 18:48:31 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 04 22:16:34 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:02:40 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:02:56 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:50:51 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:30:22 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | endangered conservation eDNA detection water sampling ddPCR versus qPCR analyses cryptic species |
Language | English |
License | 2020 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4525-cc8d358e44c798572d28f26cfd3c04c8aa576a4e5c9eaaaf83a0f5ea2e1d37023 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-0688-3268 |
PMID | 32154579 |
PQID | 2488139751 |
PQPubID | 1086393 |
PageCount | 16 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2718338101 proquest_miscellaneous_2375873394 proquest_journals_2488139751 pubmed_primary_32154579 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_jfb_14315 crossref_primary_10_1111_jfb_14315 wiley_primary_10_1111_jfb_14315_JFB14315 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | February 2021 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2021 text: February 2021 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Oxford, UK |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford, UK – name: England – name: Oxford |
PublicationTitle | Journal of fish biology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Fish Biol |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | 2015; 183 2017; 8 2013; 28 2019; 649 2019; 19 2008; 4 2013; 8 2018; 49 2011; 111 2012; 97 2014; 21 2009; 11 2014; 5 2015; 49 2018; 5 2000; 58 2019; 20 2002; 83 2015; 87 1987 2014; 14 2012; 28 2014; 9 2014; 51 2003; 84 2012; 21 2018; 38 2016; 194 2015; 6 2009; 65 2012 2011 2019b; 9 2019; 1 2011; 83 1997 2005; 42 2008; 57 2005 2011; 4 2016; 16 2016; 59 2016; 11 2015; 67 2018; 18 2010; 87 2016; 7 2004; 53 2004; 116 2019a; 9 2017; 12 2017; 183 2017 2016 2014 2018; 11 2011; 144 e_1_2_6_51_1 e_1_2_6_53_1 e_1_2_6_32_1 e_1_2_6_30_1 e_1_2_6_19_1 e_1_2_6_13_1 e_1_2_6_36_1 e_1_2_6_59_1 e_1_2_6_11_1 e_1_2_6_34_1 e_1_2_6_17_1 e_1_2_6_55_1 e_1_2_6_15_1 e_1_2_6_38_1 e_1_2_6_57_1 Herder J. E. (e_1_2_6_22_1) 2014 Mrakovčić M. (e_1_2_6_44_1) 2008; 57 e_1_2_6_43_1 Kranenbarg J. (e_1_2_6_27_1) 2009; 11 e_1_2_6_20_1 e_1_2_6_41_1 e_1_2_6_60_1 e_1_2_6_9_1 e_1_2_6_5_1 e_1_2_6_7_1 e_1_2_6_24_1 e_1_2_6_49_1 e_1_2_6_3_1 Witkowski A. (e_1_2_6_62_1) 2009; 65 e_1_2_6_45_1 e_1_2_6_26_1 e_1_2_6_47_1 e_1_2_6_52_1 e_1_2_6_54_1 e_1_2_6_10_1 e_1_2_6_31_1 e_1_2_6_50_1 Lusk S. (e_1_2_6_33_1) 2004; 53 e_1_2_6_14_1 e_1_2_6_35_1 e_1_2_6_12_1 e_1_2_6_18_1 e_1_2_6_39_1 e_1_2_6_56_1 e_1_2_6_16_1 e_1_2_6_37_1 e_1_2_6_58_1 e_1_2_6_63_1 e_1_2_6_42_1 e_1_2_6_21_1 Kranenbarg J. (e_1_2_6_28_1) 2014; 21 e_1_2_6_40_1 e_1_2_6_61_1 e_1_2_6_8_1 e_1_2_6_4_1 e_1_2_6_6_1 e_1_2_6_25_1 e_1_2_6_48_1 e_1_2_6_23_1 e_1_2_6_2_1 e_1_2_6_29_1 e_1_2_6_46_1 |
References_xml | – year: 2011 – volume: 183 start-page: 46 year: 2017 end-page: 53 article-title: Weatherfish ( ) as a new species for toxicity testing? publication-title: Aquatic Toxicology – volume: 16 start-page: 641 year: 2016 end-page: 654 article-title: A framework for estimating the sensitivity of eDNA surveys publication-title: Molecular Ecology Resources – volume: 116 start-page: 195 year: 2004 end-page: 203 article-title: Absent or undetected? Effects of non‐detection of species occurrence on wildlife‐habitat models publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 57 start-page: 35 year: 2008 end-page: 41 article-title: Conservation status of the genus Cobitis and related genera in Croatia publication-title: Folia Zoologica – volume: 84 start-page: 2200 year: 2003 end-page: 2207 article-title: Estimating site occupancy, colonization and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly publication-title: Ecology – year: 2005 – volume: 18 start-page: 368 year: 2018 end-page: 380 article-title: Ednaoccupancy: An r package for multiscale occupancy modelling of environmental DNA data publication-title: Molecular Ecology Resources – volume: 7 start-page: 1299 issue: 11 year: 2016 end-page: 1307 article-title: Critical considerations for the application of environmental DNA methods to detect aquatic species publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 649 start-page: 1157 year: 2019 end-page: 1170 article-title: eDNA as a tool for identifying freshwater species in sustainable forestry: a critical review and potential future applications publication-title: Science of the Total Environment – volume: 21 year: 2014 article-title: Nieuwe inventarisatiemethode helpt bij behoud (beschermde) grote modderkruiper publication-title: H2O‐Online – volume: 83 start-page: 2248 year: 2002 end-page: 2255 article-title: Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one publication-title: Ecology – volume: 8 year: 2013 article-title: Validation of eDNA surveillance sensitivity for detection of Asian carps in controlled and field experiments publication-title: PLoS One – start-page: 269 year: 2016 – volume: 65 start-page: 33 issue: 1 year: 2009 end-page: 52 article-title: The degrees of threat to the freshwater ichthyofauna of Poland: red list of fishes and lampreys—Situation in 2009 publication-title: Chrońmy Przyr Ojcz – volume: 12 issue: 6 year: 2017 article-title: Monitoring of noble, signal and narrow‐clawed crayfish using environmental DNA from freshwater samples publication-title: PLoS One – volume: 28 start-page: 1647 issue: 12 year: 2012 end-page: 1649 article-title: Geneious basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data publication-title: Bioinformatics – year: 2014 – volume: 144 start-page: 2177 year: 2011 end-page: 2181 article-title: Quantifying imperfect detection in an invasive pest fish and the implications for conservation management publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 1 start-page: 227 year: 2019 end-page: 237 article-title: Improved detection of rare, endangered and invasive trout in using a new large‐volume sampling method for eDNA capture publication-title: Environmental DNA – volume: 11 start-page: 44 issue: 3 year: 2009 end-page: 48 article-title: Verspreiding en achteruitgang van de grote modderkruiper in een historisch perspectief publication-title: Ravon – volume: 11 issue: 6 year: 2016 article-title: Spatial representativeness of environmental DNA Metabarcoding signal for fish biodiversity assessment in a natural freshwater system publication-title: PLoS One – year: 1997 – volume: 111 start-page: 978 year: 2011 end-page: 988 article-title: From molecules to management: adopting DNA‐based methods for monitoring biological invasions in aquatic environments publication-title: Environmental Research – volume: 183 start-page: 46 year: 2015 end-page: 52 article-title: Monitoring the near‐extinct European weather loach in Denmark based on environmental DNA from water samples publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 5 start-page: 133 year: 2018 article-title: Environmental DNA (eDNA) from the wake of the whales: Droplet digital PCR for detection and species identification publication-title: Frontiers in Marine Science – start-page: 253 year: 1987 end-page: 255 – volume: 42 start-page: 25 year: 2005 end-page: 37 article-title: Power of monitoring programmes to detect decline and recovery of rare and vulnerable fish publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology – volume: 28 start-page: 585 issue: 4 year: 2013 end-page: 590 article-title: A comparison of electrofishing methods and fyke netting to produce reliable abundance and size metrics publication-title: Journal of Freshwater Ecology – volume: 38 start-page: 592 year: 2018 end-page: 596 article-title: Comment: The importance of sound methodology in environmental DNA sampling publication-title: North American Journal of Fisheries Management – volume: 14 start-page: 323 issue: 3 year: 2014 end-page: 331 article-title: The workflow of single‐cell expression profiling using quantitative real‐time PCR publication-title: Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics – volume: 21 start-page: 2565 year: 2012 end-page: 2573 article-title: Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA publication-title: Molecular Ecology – volume: 49 start-page: 209 issue: 1 year: 2018 end-page: 230 article-title: Uses and misuses of environmental DNA in biodiversity science and conservation publication-title: Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics – volume: 194 start-page: 209 year: 2016 end-page: 216 article-title: Understanding environmental DNA detection probabilities: a case study using a stream‐dwelling char publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 20 start-page: 729 issue: 4 year: 2019 end-page: 747 article-title: Effective monitoring of freshwater fish publication-title: Fish and Fisheries – volume: 9 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2019b end-page: 10 article-title: Influence of accuracy, repeatability and detection probability in the reliability of species‐specific eDNA based approaches publication-title: Scientific Reports – volume: 87 start-page: 39 issue: 1 year: 2010 end-page: 40 article-title: Threatened fishes of the world: (Linnaeus, 1758) (Cobitidae) publication-title: Environmental Biology of Fishes – volume: 97 start-page: 185 year: 2012 end-page: 195 article-title: Evaluation of a filtration‐based method for detecting in natural bodies of water publication-title: Diseases of Aquatic Organisms – volume: 21 start-page: 2555 issue: 11 year: 2012 end-page: 2558 article-title: Conservation in a cup of water: estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental DNA publication-title: Molecular Ecology – volume: 8 start-page: 635 year: 2017 end-page: 645 article-title: Comparison of capture and storage methods for aqueous macrobial eDNA using an optimized extraction protocol: advantage of enclosed filter publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 5 start-page: 676 year: 2014 end-page: 684 article-title: Particle size distribution and optimal capture of aqueous macrobial eDNA publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 87 start-page: 3114 issue: 5 year: 2015 article-title: Correction to high sensitivity detection and quantitation of DNA copy number and single nucleotide variants with single color droplet digital PCR publication-title: Analytical Chemistry – volume: 4 start-page: 423 issue: 4 year: 2008 end-page: 425 article-title: Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples publication-title: Biology Letters – volume: 42 start-page: 1105 year: 2005 end-page: 1114 article-title: Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology – volume: 51 start-page: 1450 year: 2014 end-page: 1459 article-title: REVIEW: The detection of aquatic animal species using environmental DNA—A review of eDNA as a survey tool in ecology publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology – volume: 67 start-page: 1740 issue: 11 year: 2015 end-page: 1749 article-title: Finding the needle in the haystack: comparing sampling methods for detecting an endangered freshwater fish publication-title: Marine and Freshwater Research – year: 2012 – volume: 11 year: 2016 article-title: Potential of environmental DNA to evaluate northern pike ( ) eradication efforts: an experimental test and case study publication-title: PLoS One – volume: 9 year: 2019a article-title: Combining ddPCR and environmental DNA to improve detection capabilities of a critically endangered freshwater invertebrate publication-title: Scientific Reports – volume: 59 start-page: 991 issue: 11 year: 2016 end-page: 1007 article-title: Improving herpetological surveys in eastern North America using the environmental DNA method publication-title: Genome – volume: 11 start-page: 333 issue: 1 year: 2018 article-title: Catching the fish with the worm: a case study on eDNA detection of the monogenean parasite Gyrodactylus salaris and two of its hosts, Atlantic salmon ( ) and rainbow trout ( ) publication-title: Parasites & Vectors – volume: 19 start-page: 1407 year: 2019 end-page: 1419 article-title: A comparison of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR), quantitative PCR and metabarcoding for species‐specific detection in environmental DNA publication-title: Molecular Ecology Resources – volume: 49 start-page: 5601 issue: 9 year: 2015 end-page: 5608 article-title: Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) outperforms real‐time PCR in the detection of environmental DNA from an invasive fish species publication-title: Environmental Science & Technology – volume: 9 year: 2014 article-title: The relationship between the distribution of common carp and their environmental DNA in a small lake publication-title: PLoS One – volume: 58 start-page: 297 issue: 3 year: 2000 end-page: 306 article-title: Microhabitat preferences and movements of the weatherfish, , in a drainage channel publication-title: Environmental Biology of Fishes – volume: 51 start-page: 871 year: 2014 end-page: 879 article-title: Environmental DNA surveillance for invertebrate species: advantages and technical limitations to detect invasive crayfish in freshwater ponds publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology – volume: 12 start-page: 1 year: 2017 end-page: 6 article-title: Methods to determine limit of detection and limit of quantification in quantitative real‐time PCR (qPCR) publication-title: Biomolecular Detection and Quantification – volume: 83 start-page: 8604 issue: 22 year: 2011 end-page: 8610 article-title: High‐throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number publication-title: Analytical Chemistry – volume: 53 start-page: 215 year: 2004 end-page: 226 article-title: Red list of the ichthyofauna of The Czech Republic: development and present status publication-title: Folia Zoologica – volume: 6 start-page: 498 issue: 2 year: 2015 end-page: 510 article-title: Assessment of environmental DNA for detecting presence of imperiled aquatic amphibian species in isolated wetlands publication-title: Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management – year: 2017 – volume: 4 start-page: 150 year: 2011 end-page: 157 article-title: “Sight‐unseen” detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA publication-title: Conservation Letters – volume: 53 start-page: 215 year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_6_33_1 article-title: Red list of the ichthyofauna of The Czech Republic: development and present status publication-title: Folia Zoologica – ident: e_1_2_6_37_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058316 – ident: e_1_2_6_10_1 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00253 – ident: e_1_2_6_17_1 doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12483 – ident: e_1_2_6_58_1 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12206 – ident: e_1_2_6_45_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_51_1 doi: 10.1002/edn3.23 – ident: e_1_2_6_59_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_60_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.023 – ident: e_1_2_6_26_1 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199 – ident: e_1_2_6_47_1 doi: 10.1111/faf.12373 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179261 – ident: e_1_2_6_8_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062306 – volume-title: Environmental DNA—Toepassingsmogelijkheden voor het opsporen van (invasieve) soorten year: 2014 ident: e_1_2_6_22_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_4_1 – volume: 65 start-page: 33 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: e_1_2_6_62_1 article-title: The degrees of threat to the freshwater ichthyofauna of Poland: red list of fishes and lampreys—Situation in 2009 publication-title: Chrońmy Przyr Ojcz – ident: e_1_2_6_24_1 doi: 10.3354/dao02423 – ident: e_1_2_6_39_1 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37001-y – ident: e_1_2_6_42_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1007681313916 – ident: e_1_2_6_63_1 doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13055 – ident: e_1_2_6_19_1 doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00190-3 – ident: e_1_2_6_61_1 doi: 10.1002/nafm.10055 – ident: e_1_2_6_25_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00158.x – ident: e_1_2_6_18_1 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12595 – ident: e_1_2_6_35_1 doi: 10.1890/02-3090 – volume: 21 year: 2014 ident: e_1_2_6_28_1 article-title: Nieuwe inventarisatiemethode helpt bij behoud (beschermde) grote modderkruiper publication-title: H2O‐Online – ident: e_1_2_6_11_1 doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12735 – ident: e_1_2_6_14_1 doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0118 – ident: e_1_2_6_41_1 doi: 10.3996/042014-JFWM-034 – ident: e_1_2_6_3_1 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00133 – ident: e_1_2_6_29_1 doi: 10.1139/gen-2015-0218 – ident: e_1_2_6_32_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05600.x – ident: e_1_2_6_5_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.05.008 – ident: e_1_2_6_40_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01000.x – ident: e_1_2_6_53_1 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12683 – ident: e_1_2_6_6_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157366 – ident: e_1_2_6_38_1 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50571-9 – ident: e_1_2_6_20_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_31_1 doi: 10.1071/MF14346 – ident: e_1_2_6_15_1 doi: 10.1016/j.bdq.2017.04.001 – ident: e_1_2_6_16_1 doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T40698A10351495.en – volume: 11 start-page: 44 issue: 3 year: 2009 ident: e_1_2_6_27_1 article-title: Verspreiding en achteruitgang van de grote modderkruiper in een historisch perspectief publication-title: Ravon – volume: 57 start-page: 35 year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_6_44_1 article-title: Conservation status of the genus Cobitis and related genera in Croatia publication-title: Folia Zoologica – ident: e_1_2_6_36_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01098.x – ident: e_1_2_6_50_1 doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2016.12.006 – ident: e_1_2_6_57_1 doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12262 – ident: e_1_2_6_56_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05418.x – ident: e_1_2_6_34_1 doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2248:ESORWD]2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_6_23_1 doi: 10.1021/ac202028g – ident: e_1_2_6_46_1 doi: 10.1080/02705060.2013.810555 – ident: e_1_2_6_7_1 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.370 – ident: e_1_2_6_49_1 doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2916-3 – ident: e_1_2_6_43_1 doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00061 – ident: e_1_2_6_30_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_12_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162277 – ident: e_1_2_6_21_1 doi: 10.1007/s10641-009-9564-6 – ident: e_1_2_6_9_1 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2011.02.001 – ident: e_1_2_6_13_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112611 – ident: e_1_2_6_54_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_55_1 doi: 10.1586/14737159.2014.901154 – ident: e_1_2_6_48_1 doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12306 – ident: e_1_2_6_52_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.023 |
SSID | ssj0009393 |
Score | 2.562882 |
Snippet | The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic... The European weather loach ( Misgurnus fossilis ) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 399 |
SubjectTerms | Animals Aquaria Aquariums Belgium conservation cryptic species Cypriniformes - genetics ddPCR versus qPCR analyses Deoxyribonucleic acid Detection detection limit Dilution DNA droplets Ecosystem eDNA detection endangered Endangered Species Environmental DNA Environmental DNA - analysis Environmental DNA - genetics Environmental Monitoring extinction Fish Fish conservation Fresh Water - chemistry Freshwater fishes habitats Harbors Harbours Misgurnus fossilis Monitoring Monitoring methods Nucleotide sequence PCR Population Density Quality assessment Quality control Rare species Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction risk Sampling Sensitivity Species extinction Surveying surveys water sampling Weather Wildlife conservation |
Title | Reliable eDNA detection and quantification of the European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjfb.14315 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32154579 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2488139751 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2375873394 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2718338101 |
Volume | 98 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ZSxxBEC5ECPiiOTw2MaETfNCHkbWPOciTRxYR9CEoiChDTR-yuMyazA6B_PpU9xyeCcG3galmerq6ur-qrvoaYENwK4w2PnJveSSLmGxu6FwkJMaeayQ1mS8UPj6JD8_k0bk6n4OvXS1Mww_RB9y8ZYT12hs4FtV9I3cFmbkIBeY-V8sDou931FGZaAl3ydmiBrxlFQpZPF3Lh3vRE4D5EK-GDWe0BJddV5s8k5vtelZs69-PWBxf-C-vYbEFomy3mTlvYM6Wb-HVxTSE2d_Blc9V9mVVzB6c7DJjZyFnq2RYGvajxibHKKiVTR0jGMm6wD771cBKNvHFWmzzeFxd08fqijkahfFkXG0tw9no2-n-YdRexRBpf_AZaZ0aoVIrpU6yVCXc8NTxWDsj9FDqFJH8FpRW6cwioksFDp2yyO2OEQnhghWYL6elXQOmYktuDPKsGKYSCU3JwnCMFdLakhmtBrDZKSXXLU-5vy5jkvf-iivyMFoD-NKL3jbkHM8JrXeazVv7rHJO65bHvmpnAJ_712RZ_rgESzutSUaQL5UIkcl_yNDWLgJJ2gBWm1nT90RwD0-TjH4o6P7vXcyPRnvh4f3_i36ABe7Ta0IC-TrMz37W9iPho1nxKRjCHzIJCdY |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1LTxRBEK4QDJGLb3QBtTWa4GHIbj_mcfCALpvlsXswkBATM_T0w2zczAqzEwK_yb_if7K65wH4ihcO3iaZSqanu6r6q66qrwFeMWqYVtqd3Bsa8CxEm-taGzAuQ8c1EuvENQqPxuHwkO8eiaMF-Nb0wlT8EO2Bm7MM76-dgbsD6atWbjO0c9ZrSir3zPkZBmzF250-ru5rSgfbB--HQX2nQKBcBi9QKtZMxIZzFSWxiKimsaWhspqpLlexlAjAJTdCJUZKaWMmu1YYSU1Ps8jTHKDDv-VuEHdM_f0Pl2RVCaspfjG8wxHSmsfI1w01Q72--_0Caa8jZL_FDe7C92ZyqsqWL5vlPNtUFz_xRv4vs3cP7tRYm2xVxnEfFkz-AJY-znwm4SF8cuXYrnOMmP54i2gz92VpOZG5JielrMqovOaSmSWIlEmTuyBnFXImU9ePRjZGk-IzfqwsiMVpn0wnxZtHcHgj_7YCi_ksN0-AiNBgpCZpknVjLhEw8kxTGQqJ7jPRSnRgo9GCVNVU7O5GkGnahmQ2S_3qdOBlK_q14h_5ndB6o0pp7YKKlKJrdvBe9Drwon2NzsNlhGRuZiXKMAwXI8YS_hcZRC_M88B14HGlpu1IGHUIPErwh7yy_XmI6e7gnX9Y_XfR53B7eDDaT_d3xntrsExdNZGvl1-HxflpaZ4iHJxnz7wVEji-acX9AedsaVw |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1ZaxRBEC5CRPFF470maisK8WHCbB8z0w8-RNclh1lEDAQhjD19yOIyGzM7BP1L-Sv-KKt7Do0XvuTBt4EpmD6qqr-aqvoa4DGjlhlt_J97SyNeJGhzsXMR4yrxXCOZkb5ReG-SbO3znQNxsASnXS9Mww_R_3DzlhH8tTfwI-N-NHJXoJmzYVdRuWs_n2C8Vj3bHuHmPqF0_PLti62ovVIg0j6BF2mdGSYyy7lOZSZSamjmaKKdYTrmOlMK8bfiVmhplVIuYyp2wipqh4algeUA_f0FnsTS3xMxevOdq0qyluEXozscIW1pjELZUDfUs4ffL4j2LEAOJ9z4Knzt1qYpbPm4US-KDf3lJ9rI_2TxVuBKi7TJZmMa12DJltfh4rt5yCPcgENfjO37xogdTTaJsYtQlFYSVRryqVZNEVXQWzJ3BHEy6TIX5KTBzWTmu9HI-t60-oAfqyvicNWns2n19Cbsn8vcbsFyOS_tHSAisRinKSqLOOMK4SIvDFWJUOg8pdFiAOudEuS6JWL394HM8j4gc0UedmcAj3rRo4Z95HdCa50m5a0DqnKKjtmDezEcwMP-NboOnw9SpZ3XKMMwWEwZk_wvMohdWGCBG8DtRkv7kTDq8XcqcUJB1_48xHxn_Dw83P130Qdw6fVonL_anuyuwmXqS4lCsfwaLC-Oa3sPseCiuB9skMD789bbby1vaAs |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliable+eDNA+detection+and+quantification+of+the+European+weather+loach+%28Misgurnus+fossilis%29&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+fish+biology&rft.au=Brys%2C+Rein&rft.au=Halfmaerten%2C+David&rft.au=Neyrinck%2C+Sabrina&rft.au=Mauvisseau%2C+Quentin&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=0022-1112&rft.eissn=1095-8649&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=414&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fjfb.14315&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fjfb.14315&rft.externalDocID=JFB14315 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-1112&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-1112&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-1112&client=summon |