Reliable eDNA detection and quantification of the European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis)

The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic population collapses across its native range to the point of regional extinction. Although environmental DNA (eDNA)‐based approaches offer cle...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of fish biology Vol. 98; no. 2; pp. 399 - 414
Main Authors Brys, Rein, Halfmaerten, David, Neyrinck, Sabrina, Mauvisseau, Quentin, Auwerx, Johan, Sweet, Michael, Mergeay, Joachim
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2021
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic population collapses across its native range to the point of regional extinction. Although environmental DNA (eDNA)‐based approaches offer clear advantages over conventional field methods for monitoring rare and endangered species, accurate detection and quantification remain difficult and quality assessment is often poorly incorporated. In this study, we developed and validated a novel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) eDNA‐based method for reliable detection and quantification, which allows accurate monitoring of M. fossilis across a number of habitat types. A dilution experiment under laboratory conditions allowed the definition of the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ), which were set at concentrations of 0.07 and 0.14 copies μl–1, respectively. A series of aquarium experiments revealed a significant and positive relationship between the number of individuals and the eDNA concentration measured. During a 3 year survey (2017–2019), we assessed 96 locations for the presence of M. fossilis in Flanders (Belgium). eDNA analyses on these samples highlighted 45% positive detections of the species. On the basis of the eDNA concentration per litre of water, only 12 sites appeared to harbour relatively dense populations. The other 31 sites gave a relatively weak positive signal that was typically situated below the LOQ. Combining sample‐specific estimates of effective DNA quantity (Qe) and conventional field sampling, we concluded that each of these weak positive sites still likely harboured the species and therefore they do not represent false positives. Further, only seven of the classified negative samples warrant additional sampling as our analyses identified a substantial risk of false‐negative detections (i.e., type II errors) at these locations. Finally, we illustrated that ddPCR outcompetes conventional qPCR analyses, especially when target DNA concentrations are critically low, which could be attributed to a reduced sensitivity of ddPCR to inhibition effects, higher sample concentrations being accommodated and higher sensitivity obtained.
AbstractList The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic population collapses across its native range to the point of regional extinction. Although environmental DNA (eDNA)‐based approaches offer clear advantages over conventional field methods for monitoring rare and endangered species, accurate detection and quantification remain difficult and quality assessment is often poorly incorporated. In this study, we developed and validated a novel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) eDNA‐based method for reliable detection and quantification, which allows accurate monitoring of M. fossilis across a number of habitat types. A dilution experiment under laboratory conditions allowed the definition of the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ), which were set at concentrations of 0.07 and 0.14 copies μl–1, respectively. A series of aquarium experiments revealed a significant and positive relationship between the number of individuals and the eDNA concentration measured. During a 3 year survey (2017–2019), we assessed 96 locations for the presence of M. fossilis in Flanders (Belgium). eDNA analyses on these samples highlighted 45% positive detections of the species. On the basis of the eDNA concentration per litre of water, only 12 sites appeared to harbour relatively dense populations. The other 31 sites gave a relatively weak positive signal that was typically situated below the LOQ. Combining sample‐specific estimates of effective DNA quantity (Qe) and conventional field sampling, we concluded that each of these weak positive sites still likely harboured the species and therefore they do not represent false positives. Further, only seven of the classified negative samples warrant additional sampling as our analyses identified a substantial risk of false‐negative detections (i.e., type II errors) at these locations. Finally, we illustrated that ddPCR outcompetes conventional qPCR analyses, especially when target DNA concentrations are critically low, which could be attributed to a reduced sensitivity of ddPCR to inhibition effects, higher sample concentrations being accommodated and higher sensitivity obtained.
The European weather loach ( Misgurnus fossilis ) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic population collapses across its native range to the point of regional extinction. Although environmental DNA (eDNA)‐based approaches offer clear advantages over conventional field methods for monitoring rare and endangered species, accurate detection and quantification remain difficult and quality assessment is often poorly incorporated. In this study, we developed and validated a novel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) eDNA‐based method for reliable detection and quantification, which allows accurate monitoring of M. fossilis across a number of habitat types. A dilution experiment under laboratory conditions allowed the definition of the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ), which were set at concentrations of 0.07 and 0.14 copies μl –1 , respectively. A series of aquarium experiments revealed a significant and positive relationship between the number of individuals and the eDNA concentration measured. During a 3 year survey (2017–2019), we assessed 96 locations for the presence of M. fossilis in Flanders (Belgium). eDNA analyses on these samples highlighted 45% positive detections of the species. On the basis of the eDNA concentration per litre of water, only 12 sites appeared to harbour relatively dense populations. The other 31 sites gave a relatively weak positive signal that was typically situated below the LOQ. Combining sample‐specific estimates of effective DNA quantity ( Q e ) and conventional field sampling, we concluded that each of these weak positive sites still likely harboured the species and therefore they do not represent false positives. Further, only seven of the classified negative samples warrant additional sampling as our analyses identified a substantial risk of false‐negative detections ( i.e. , type II errors) at these locations. Finally, we illustrated that ddPCR outcompetes conventional qPCR analyses, especially when target DNA concentrations are critically low, which could be attributed to a reduced sensitivity of ddPCR to inhibition effects, higher sample concentrations being accommodated and higher sensitivity obtained.
The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic population collapses across its native range to the point of regional extinction. Although environmental DNA (eDNA)‐based approaches offer clear advantages over conventional field methods for monitoring rare and endangered species, accurate detection and quantification remain difficult and quality assessment is often poorly incorporated. In this study, we developed and validated a novel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) eDNA‐based method for reliable detection and quantification, which allows accurate monitoring of M. fossilis across a number of habitat types. A dilution experiment under laboratory conditions allowed the definition of the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ), which were set at concentrations of 0.07 and 0.14 copies μl–¹, respectively. A series of aquarium experiments revealed a significant and positive relationship between the number of individuals and the eDNA concentration measured. During a 3 year survey (2017–2019), we assessed 96 locations for the presence of M. fossilis in Flanders (Belgium). eDNA analyses on these samples highlighted 45% positive detections of the species. On the basis of the eDNA concentration per litre of water, only 12 sites appeared to harbour relatively dense populations. The other 31 sites gave a relatively weak positive signal that was typically situated below the LOQ. Combining sample‐specific estimates of effective DNA quantity (Qₑ) and conventional field sampling, we concluded that each of these weak positive sites still likely harboured the species and therefore they do not represent false positives. Further, only seven of the classified negative samples warrant additional sampling as our analyses identified a substantial risk of false‐negative detections (i.e., type II errors) at these locations. Finally, we illustrated that ddPCR outcompetes conventional qPCR analyses, especially when target DNA concentrations are critically low, which could be attributed to a reduced sensitivity of ddPCR to inhibition effects, higher sample concentrations being accommodated and higher sensitivity obtained.
The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic population collapses across its native range to the point of regional extinction. Although environmental DNA (eDNA)-based approaches offer clear advantages over conventional field methods for monitoring rare and endangered species, accurate detection and quantification remain difficult and quality assessment is often poorly incorporated. In this study, we developed and validated a novel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) eDNA-based method for reliable detection and quantification, which allows accurate monitoring of M. fossilis across a number of habitat types. A dilution experiment under laboratory conditions allowed the definition of the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ), which were set at concentrations of 0.07 and 0.14 copies μl-1 , respectively. A series of aquarium experiments revealed a significant and positive relationship between the number of individuals and the eDNA concentration measured. During a 3 year survey (2017-2019), we assessed 96 locations for the presence of M. fossilis in Flanders (Belgium). eDNA analyses on these samples highlighted 45% positive detections of the species. On the basis of the eDNA concentration per litre of water, only 12 sites appeared to harbour relatively dense populations. The other 31 sites gave a relatively weak positive signal that was typically situated below the LOQ. Combining sample-specific estimates of effective DNA quantity (Qe ) and conventional field sampling, we concluded that each of these weak positive sites still likely harboured the species and therefore they do not represent false positives. Further, only seven of the classified negative samples warrant additional sampling as our analyses identified a substantial risk of false-negative detections (i.e., type II errors) at these locations. Finally, we illustrated that ddPCR outcompetes conventional qPCR analyses, especially when target DNA concentrations are critically low, which could be attributed to a reduced sensitivity of ddPCR to inhibition effects, higher sample concentrations being accommodated and higher sensitivity obtained.The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic population collapses across its native range to the point of regional extinction. Although environmental DNA (eDNA)-based approaches offer clear advantages over conventional field methods for monitoring rare and endangered species, accurate detection and quantification remain difficult and quality assessment is often poorly incorporated. In this study, we developed and validated a novel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) eDNA-based method for reliable detection and quantification, which allows accurate monitoring of M. fossilis across a number of habitat types. A dilution experiment under laboratory conditions allowed the definition of the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ), which were set at concentrations of 0.07 and 0.14 copies μl-1 , respectively. A series of aquarium experiments revealed a significant and positive relationship between the number of individuals and the eDNA concentration measured. During a 3 year survey (2017-2019), we assessed 96 locations for the presence of M. fossilis in Flanders (Belgium). eDNA analyses on these samples highlighted 45% positive detections of the species. On the basis of the eDNA concentration per litre of water, only 12 sites appeared to harbour relatively dense populations. The other 31 sites gave a relatively weak positive signal that was typically situated below the LOQ. Combining sample-specific estimates of effective DNA quantity (Qe ) and conventional field sampling, we concluded that each of these weak positive sites still likely harboured the species and therefore they do not represent false positives. Further, only seven of the classified negative samples warrant additional sampling as our analyses identified a substantial risk of false-negative detections (i.e., type II errors) at these locations. Finally, we illustrated that ddPCR outcompetes conventional qPCR analyses, especially when target DNA concentrations are critically low, which could be attributed to a reduced sensitivity of ddPCR to inhibition effects, higher sample concentrations being accommodated and higher sensitivity obtained.
The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic population collapses across its native range to the point of regional extinction. Although environmental DNA (eDNA)-based approaches offer clear advantages over conventional field methods for monitoring rare and endangered species, accurate detection and quantification remain difficult and quality assessment is often poorly incorporated. In this study, we developed and validated a novel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) eDNA-based method for reliable detection and quantification, which allows accurate monitoring of M. fossilis across a number of habitat types. A dilution experiment under laboratory conditions allowed the definition of the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ), which were set at concentrations of 0.07 and 0.14 copies μl , respectively. A series of aquarium experiments revealed a significant and positive relationship between the number of individuals and the eDNA concentration measured. During a 3 year survey (2017-2019), we assessed 96 locations for the presence of M. fossilis in Flanders (Belgium). eDNA analyses on these samples highlighted 45% positive detections of the species. On the basis of the eDNA concentration per litre of water, only 12 sites appeared to harbour relatively dense populations. The other 31 sites gave a relatively weak positive signal that was typically situated below the LOQ. Combining sample-specific estimates of effective DNA quantity (Q ) and conventional field sampling, we concluded that each of these weak positive sites still likely harboured the species and therefore they do not represent false positives. Further, only seven of the classified negative samples warrant additional sampling as our analyses identified a substantial risk of false-negative detections (i.e., type II errors) at these locations. Finally, we illustrated that ddPCR outcompetes conventional qPCR analyses, especially when target DNA concentrations are critically low, which could be attributed to a reduced sensitivity of ddPCR to inhibition effects, higher sample concentrations being accommodated and higher sensitivity obtained.
Author Sweet, Michael
Brys, Rein
Mergeay, Joachim
Neyrinck, Sabrina
Mauvisseau, Quentin
Halfmaerten, David
Auwerx, Johan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Rein
  orcidid: 0000-0002-0688-3268
  surname: Brys
  fullname: Brys, Rein
  email: rein.brys@inbo.be
  organization: Research Institute for Nature and Forest
– sequence: 2
  givenname: David
  surname: Halfmaerten
  fullname: Halfmaerten, David
  organization: Research Institute for Nature and Forest
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Sabrina
  surname: Neyrinck
  fullname: Neyrinck, Sabrina
  organization: Research Institute for Nature and Forest
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Quentin
  surname: Mauvisseau
  fullname: Mauvisseau, Quentin
  organization: SureScreen Scientifics Ltd
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Johan
  surname: Auwerx
  fullname: Auwerx, Johan
  organization: Research Institute for Nature and Forest
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Michael
  surname: Sweet
  fullname: Sweet, Michael
  organization: SureScreen Scientifics Ltd
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Joachim
  surname: Mergeay
  fullname: Mergeay, Joachim
  organization: Research Institute for Nature and Forest
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32154579$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkV9PFDEUxRuDkQV98AuYJr7Aw0D_bttHRBAMamL00TR3O7fSTXdmmc6E8O0tu8sL0Xhfmtv8zknuOQdkr-s7JOQtZye8zukyLk64kly_IDPOnG7sXLk9MmNMiKYCYp8clLJkjDnp5CuyLwXXShs3I7--Y06wyEjx49cz2uKIYUx9R6Fr6d0E3ZhiCrD56iMdb5FeTEO_RujoPULdB5p7CLf06Esqv6ehmwqNfSkpp3L8mryMkAu-2b2H5OflxY_zq-bm26fr87ObJigtdBOCbaW2qFQwzmojWmGjmIfYysBUsADazEGhDg4BIFoJLGoEgbyVhgl5SI62vuuhv5uwjH6VSsCcocN-Kl4YbqW0nPH_o9Joa6R0qqLvn6HLvh5YD_FCWculM_rR8N2OmhYrbP16SCsYHvxTxhU43QJhqLkMGH1I4ybRcYCUPWf-sUVfW_SbFqvi-JniyfRv7M79PmV8-DfoP19-2Cr-ACUWqgw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e17102
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_7382
crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_426
crossref_primary_10_3390_d15050631
crossref_primary_10_3390_w13081113
crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_301
crossref_primary_10_1002_lom3_10634
crossref_primary_10_11609_jott_7837_14_5_21102_21116
crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_501
crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_589
crossref_primary_10_3897_neobiota_69_67708
crossref_primary_10_1051_e3sconf_202344201021
crossref_primary_10_1002_aqc_4072
crossref_primary_10_3390_w17050661
crossref_primary_10_1139_gen_2023_0008
crossref_primary_10_1002_aqc_4111
crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2020_612253
crossref_primary_10_1111_cobi_13849
crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_394
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_10807
crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_351
crossref_primary_10_1111_jfb_14660
crossref_primary_10_1088_1742_6596_2353_1_012010
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_90771_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envadv_2021_100163
crossref_primary_10_1111_ecog_07347
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fishres_2023_106708
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envres_2023_115857
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pwat_0000066
crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_188
crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_420
crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_260
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_8372
crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2022_725360
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_149175
crossref_primary_10_1111_1755_0998_14076
crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_70036
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_025_03033_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envadv_2023_100370
crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_15210
crossref_primary_10_3390_fishes8010041
crossref_primary_10_1111_jfb_14218
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11160_022_09741_8
crossref_primary_10_1111_1755_0998_13703
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2023_166675
crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2023_1025105
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0272660
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00227_023_04193_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00227_025_04609_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10661_024_12788_8
crossref_primary_10_3390_biology10090899
crossref_primary_10_3390_biology10121223
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmars_2023_1061530
crossref_primary_10_3897_neobiota_79_82793
crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_14679
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_172281
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani15020285
crossref_primary_10_1002_aqc_4245
crossref_primary_10_1111_1755_0998_13839
crossref_primary_10_1002_aqc_3916
crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_200
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2023_110125
crossref_primary_10_1111_ddi_13284
Cites_doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0058316
10.1021/acs.est.5b00253
10.1111/1755-0998.12483
10.1111/2041-210X.12206
10.1002/edn3.23
10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.023
10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199
10.1111/faf.12373
10.1371/journal.pone.0179261
10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062306
10.3354/dao02423
10.1038/s41598-018-37001-y
10.1023/A:1007681313916
10.1111/1755-0998.13055
10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00190-3
10.1002/nafm.10055
10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00158.x
10.1111/2041-210X.12595
10.1890/02-3090
10.1111/1755-0998.12735
10.1098/rsbl.2008.0118
10.3996/042014-JFWM-034
10.3389/fmars.2018.00133
10.1139/gen-2015-0218
10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05600.x
10.1016/j.biocon.2011.05.008
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01000.x
10.1111/2041-210X.12683
10.1371/journal.pone.0157366
10.1038/s41598-019-50571-9
10.1071/MF14346
10.1016/j.bdq.2017.04.001
10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T40698A10351495.en
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01098.x
10.1016/j.aquatox.2016.12.006
10.1111/1365-2664.12262
10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05418.x
10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2248:ESORWD]2.0.CO;2
10.1021/ac202028g
10.1080/02705060.2013.810555
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.370
10.1186/s13071-018-2916-3
10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00061
10.1371/journal.pone.0162277
10.1007/s10641-009-9564-6
10.1016/j.envres.2011.02.001
10.1371/journal.pone.0112611
10.1586/14737159.2014.901154
10.1111/1365-2664.12306
10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.023
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles
2020 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles.
Journal of Fish Biology © 2021 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles
– notice: 2020 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles.
– notice: Journal of Fish Biology © 2021 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QG
7SN
7TN
8FD
C1K
F1W
FR3
H95
L.G
P64
RC3
7X8
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1111/jfb.14315
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Ecology Abstracts
Oceanic Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Genetics Abstracts
Oceanic Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Animal Behavior Abstracts
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Ecology Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
CrossRef
AGRICOLA
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Zoology
EISSN 1095-8649
EndPage 414
ExternalDocumentID 32154579
10_1111_jfb_14315
JFB14315
Genre article
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Belgium
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Belgium
GroupedDBID ---
--K
-~X
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1B1
1OB
1OC
29K
31~
33P
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHBH
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAJYS
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPPZ
ABPVW
ABTAH
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHEFC
AI.
AIAGR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJXKR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AUFTA
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BGJEQ
BHBCM
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
CAG
COF
CS3
D-E
D-F
D-I
DC6
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
ECGQY
EJD
ESX
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.T
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LG5
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NQ-
O66
O9-
OIG
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
PALCI
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RPZ
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TN5
TWZ
UB1
UPT
V8K
VH1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WIH
WIK
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WUPDE
WXSBR
WYISQ
XG1
XOL
XPP
YK3
YQT
ZCG
ZMT
ZY4
ZZTAW
~02
~IA
~WT
AAYXX
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGYGG
CITATION
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QG
7SN
7TN
8FD
C1K
F1W
FR3
H95
L.G
P64
RC3
7X8
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4525-cc8d358e44c798572d28f26cfd3c04c8aa576a4e5c9eaaaf83a0f5ea2e1d37023
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0022-1112
1095-8649
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 18:25:26 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 18:48:31 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 04 22:16:34 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:02:40 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:56 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:50:51 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:30:22 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords endangered
conservation
eDNA detection
water sampling
ddPCR versus qPCR analyses
cryptic species
Language English
License 2020 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4525-cc8d358e44c798572d28f26cfd3c04c8aa576a4e5c9eaaaf83a0f5ea2e1d37023
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-0688-3268
PMID 32154579
PQID 2488139751
PQPubID 1086393
PageCount 16
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2718338101
proquest_miscellaneous_2375873394
proquest_journals_2488139751
pubmed_primary_32154579
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_jfb_14315
crossref_primary_10_1111_jfb_14315
wiley_primary_10_1111_jfb_14315_JFB14315
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate February 2021
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2021
  text: February 2021
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Oxford, UK
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford, UK
– name: England
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle Journal of fish biology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Fish Biol
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 2015; 183
2017; 8
2013; 28
2019; 649
2019; 19
2008; 4
2013; 8
2018; 49
2011; 111
2012; 97
2014; 21
2009; 11
2014; 5
2015; 49
2018; 5
2000; 58
2019; 20
2002; 83
2015; 87
1987
2014; 14
2012; 28
2014; 9
2014; 51
2003; 84
2012; 21
2018; 38
2016; 194
2015; 6
2009; 65
2012
2011
2019b; 9
2019; 1
2011; 83
1997
2005; 42
2008; 57
2005
2011; 4
2016; 16
2016; 59
2016; 11
2015; 67
2018; 18
2010; 87
2016; 7
2004; 53
2004; 116
2019a; 9
2017; 12
2017; 183
2017
2016
2014
2018; 11
2011; 144
e_1_2_6_51_1
e_1_2_6_53_1
e_1_2_6_32_1
e_1_2_6_30_1
e_1_2_6_19_1
e_1_2_6_13_1
e_1_2_6_36_1
e_1_2_6_59_1
e_1_2_6_11_1
e_1_2_6_34_1
e_1_2_6_17_1
e_1_2_6_55_1
e_1_2_6_15_1
e_1_2_6_38_1
e_1_2_6_57_1
Herder J. E. (e_1_2_6_22_1) 2014
Mrakovčić M. (e_1_2_6_44_1) 2008; 57
e_1_2_6_43_1
Kranenbarg J. (e_1_2_6_27_1) 2009; 11
e_1_2_6_20_1
e_1_2_6_41_1
e_1_2_6_60_1
e_1_2_6_9_1
e_1_2_6_5_1
e_1_2_6_7_1
e_1_2_6_24_1
e_1_2_6_49_1
e_1_2_6_3_1
Witkowski A. (e_1_2_6_62_1) 2009; 65
e_1_2_6_45_1
e_1_2_6_26_1
e_1_2_6_47_1
e_1_2_6_52_1
e_1_2_6_54_1
e_1_2_6_10_1
e_1_2_6_31_1
e_1_2_6_50_1
Lusk S. (e_1_2_6_33_1) 2004; 53
e_1_2_6_14_1
e_1_2_6_35_1
e_1_2_6_12_1
e_1_2_6_18_1
e_1_2_6_39_1
e_1_2_6_56_1
e_1_2_6_16_1
e_1_2_6_37_1
e_1_2_6_58_1
e_1_2_6_63_1
e_1_2_6_42_1
e_1_2_6_21_1
Kranenbarg J. (e_1_2_6_28_1) 2014; 21
e_1_2_6_40_1
e_1_2_6_61_1
e_1_2_6_8_1
e_1_2_6_4_1
e_1_2_6_6_1
e_1_2_6_25_1
e_1_2_6_48_1
e_1_2_6_23_1
e_1_2_6_2_1
e_1_2_6_29_1
e_1_2_6_46_1
References_xml – year: 2011
– volume: 183
  start-page: 46
  year: 2017
  end-page: 53
  article-title: Weatherfish ( ) as a new species for toxicity testing?
  publication-title: Aquatic Toxicology
– volume: 16
  start-page: 641
  year: 2016
  end-page: 654
  article-title: A framework for estimating the sensitivity of eDNA surveys
  publication-title: Molecular Ecology Resources
– volume: 116
  start-page: 195
  year: 2004
  end-page: 203
  article-title: Absent or undetected? Effects of non‐detection of species occurrence on wildlife‐habitat models
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– volume: 57
  start-page: 35
  year: 2008
  end-page: 41
  article-title: Conservation status of the genus Cobitis and related genera in Croatia
  publication-title: Folia Zoologica
– volume: 84
  start-page: 2200
  year: 2003
  end-page: 2207
  article-title: Estimating site occupancy, colonization and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly
  publication-title: Ecology
– year: 2005
– volume: 18
  start-page: 368
  year: 2018
  end-page: 380
  article-title: Ednaoccupancy: An r package for multiscale occupancy modelling of environmental DNA data
  publication-title: Molecular Ecology Resources
– volume: 7
  start-page: 1299
  issue: 11
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1307
  article-title: Critical considerations for the application of environmental DNA methods to detect aquatic species
  publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution
– volume: 649
  start-page: 1157
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1170
  article-title: eDNA as a tool for identifying freshwater species in sustainable forestry: a critical review and potential future applications
  publication-title: Science of the Total Environment
– volume: 21
  year: 2014
  article-title: Nieuwe inventarisatiemethode helpt bij behoud (beschermde) grote modderkruiper
  publication-title: H2O‐Online
– volume: 83
  start-page: 2248
  year: 2002
  end-page: 2255
  article-title: Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one
  publication-title: Ecology
– volume: 8
  year: 2013
  article-title: Validation of eDNA surveillance sensitivity for detection of Asian carps in controlled and field experiments
  publication-title: PLoS One
– start-page: 269
  year: 2016
– volume: 65
  start-page: 33
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  end-page: 52
  article-title: The degrees of threat to the freshwater ichthyofauna of Poland: red list of fishes and lampreys—Situation in 2009
  publication-title: Chrońmy Przyr Ojcz
– volume: 12
  issue: 6
  year: 2017
  article-title: Monitoring of noble, signal and narrow‐clawed crayfish using environmental DNA from freshwater samples
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1647
  issue: 12
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1649
  article-title: Geneious basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data
  publication-title: Bioinformatics
– year: 2014
– volume: 144
  start-page: 2177
  year: 2011
  end-page: 2181
  article-title: Quantifying imperfect detection in an invasive pest fish and the implications for conservation management
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– volume: 1
  start-page: 227
  year: 2019
  end-page: 237
  article-title: Improved detection of rare, endangered and invasive trout in using a new large‐volume sampling method for eDNA capture
  publication-title: Environmental DNA
– volume: 11
  start-page: 44
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  end-page: 48
  article-title: Verspreiding en achteruitgang van de grote modderkruiper in een historisch perspectief
  publication-title: Ravon
– volume: 11
  issue: 6
  year: 2016
  article-title: Spatial representativeness of environmental DNA Metabarcoding signal for fish biodiversity assessment in a natural freshwater system
  publication-title: PLoS One
– year: 1997
– volume: 111
  start-page: 978
  year: 2011
  end-page: 988
  article-title: From molecules to management: adopting DNA‐based methods for monitoring biological invasions in aquatic environments
  publication-title: Environmental Research
– volume: 183
  start-page: 46
  year: 2015
  end-page: 52
  article-title: Monitoring the near‐extinct European weather loach in Denmark based on environmental DNA from water samples
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– volume: 5
  start-page: 133
  year: 2018
  article-title: Environmental DNA (eDNA) from the wake of the whales: Droplet digital PCR for detection and species identification
  publication-title: Frontiers in Marine Science
– start-page: 253
  year: 1987
  end-page: 255
– volume: 42
  start-page: 25
  year: 2005
  end-page: 37
  article-title: Power of monitoring programmes to detect decline and recovery of rare and vulnerable fish
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– volume: 28
  start-page: 585
  issue: 4
  year: 2013
  end-page: 590
  article-title: A comparison of electrofishing methods and fyke netting to produce reliable abundance and size metrics
  publication-title: Journal of Freshwater Ecology
– volume: 38
  start-page: 592
  year: 2018
  end-page: 596
  article-title: Comment: The importance of sound methodology in environmental DNA sampling
  publication-title: North American Journal of Fisheries Management
– volume: 14
  start-page: 323
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  end-page: 331
  article-title: The workflow of single‐cell expression profiling using quantitative real‐time PCR
  publication-title: Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
– volume: 21
  start-page: 2565
  year: 2012
  end-page: 2573
  article-title: Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA
  publication-title: Molecular Ecology
– volume: 49
  start-page: 209
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  end-page: 230
  article-title: Uses and misuses of environmental DNA in biodiversity science and conservation
  publication-title: Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
– volume: 194
  start-page: 209
  year: 2016
  end-page: 216
  article-title: Understanding environmental DNA detection probabilities: a case study using a stream‐dwelling char
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– volume: 20
  start-page: 729
  issue: 4
  year: 2019
  end-page: 747
  article-title: Effective monitoring of freshwater fish
  publication-title: Fish and Fisheries
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2019b
  end-page: 10
  article-title: Influence of accuracy, repeatability and detection probability in the reliability of species‐specific eDNA based approaches
  publication-title: Scientific Reports
– volume: 87
  start-page: 39
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 40
  article-title: Threatened fishes of the world: (Linnaeus, 1758) (Cobitidae)
  publication-title: Environmental Biology of Fishes
– volume: 97
  start-page: 185
  year: 2012
  end-page: 195
  article-title: Evaluation of a filtration‐based method for detecting in natural bodies of water
  publication-title: Diseases of Aquatic Organisms
– volume: 21
  start-page: 2555
  issue: 11
  year: 2012
  end-page: 2558
  article-title: Conservation in a cup of water: estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental DNA
  publication-title: Molecular Ecology
– volume: 8
  start-page: 635
  year: 2017
  end-page: 645
  article-title: Comparison of capture and storage methods for aqueous macrobial eDNA using an optimized extraction protocol: advantage of enclosed filter
  publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution
– volume: 5
  start-page: 676
  year: 2014
  end-page: 684
  article-title: Particle size distribution and optimal capture of aqueous macrobial eDNA
  publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution
– volume: 87
  start-page: 3114
  issue: 5
  year: 2015
  article-title: Correction to high sensitivity detection and quantitation of DNA copy number and single nucleotide variants with single color droplet digital PCR
  publication-title: Analytical Chemistry
– volume: 4
  start-page: 423
  issue: 4
  year: 2008
  end-page: 425
  article-title: Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples
  publication-title: Biology Letters
– volume: 42
  start-page: 1105
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1114
  article-title: Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– volume: 51
  start-page: 1450
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1459
  article-title: REVIEW: The detection of aquatic animal species using environmental DNA—A review of eDNA as a survey tool in ecology
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– volume: 67
  start-page: 1740
  issue: 11
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1749
  article-title: Finding the needle in the haystack: comparing sampling methods for detecting an endangered freshwater fish
  publication-title: Marine and Freshwater Research
– year: 2012
– volume: 11
  year: 2016
  article-title: Potential of environmental DNA to evaluate northern pike ( ) eradication efforts: an experimental test and case study
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 9
  year: 2019a
  article-title: Combining ddPCR and environmental DNA to improve detection capabilities of a critically endangered freshwater invertebrate
  publication-title: Scientific Reports
– volume: 59
  start-page: 991
  issue: 11
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1007
  article-title: Improving herpetological surveys in eastern North America using the environmental DNA method
  publication-title: Genome
– volume: 11
  start-page: 333
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  article-title: Catching the fish with the worm: a case study on eDNA detection of the monogenean parasite Gyrodactylus salaris and two of its hosts, Atlantic salmon ( ) and rainbow trout ( )
  publication-title: Parasites & Vectors
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1407
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1419
  article-title: A comparison of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR), quantitative PCR and metabarcoding for species‐specific detection in environmental DNA
  publication-title: Molecular Ecology Resources
– volume: 49
  start-page: 5601
  issue: 9
  year: 2015
  end-page: 5608
  article-title: Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) outperforms real‐time PCR in the detection of environmental DNA from an invasive fish species
  publication-title: Environmental Science & Technology
– volume: 9
  year: 2014
  article-title: The relationship between the distribution of common carp and their environmental DNA in a small lake
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 58
  start-page: 297
  issue: 3
  year: 2000
  end-page: 306
  article-title: Microhabitat preferences and movements of the weatherfish, , in a drainage channel
  publication-title: Environmental Biology of Fishes
– volume: 51
  start-page: 871
  year: 2014
  end-page: 879
  article-title: Environmental DNA surveillance for invertebrate species: advantages and technical limitations to detect invasive crayfish in freshwater ponds
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  end-page: 6
  article-title: Methods to determine limit of detection and limit of quantification in quantitative real‐time PCR (qPCR)
  publication-title: Biomolecular Detection and Quantification
– volume: 83
  start-page: 8604
  issue: 22
  year: 2011
  end-page: 8610
  article-title: High‐throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number
  publication-title: Analytical Chemistry
– volume: 53
  start-page: 215
  year: 2004
  end-page: 226
  article-title: Red list of the ichthyofauna of The Czech Republic: development and present status
  publication-title: Folia Zoologica
– volume: 6
  start-page: 498
  issue: 2
  year: 2015
  end-page: 510
  article-title: Assessment of environmental DNA for detecting presence of imperiled aquatic amphibian species in isolated wetlands
  publication-title: Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management
– year: 2017
– volume: 4
  start-page: 150
  year: 2011
  end-page: 157
  article-title: “Sight‐unseen” detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA
  publication-title: Conservation Letters
– volume: 53
  start-page: 215
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_6_33_1
  article-title: Red list of the ichthyofauna of The Czech Republic: development and present status
  publication-title: Folia Zoologica
– ident: e_1_2_6_37_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058316
– ident: e_1_2_6_10_1
  doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00253
– ident: e_1_2_6_17_1
  doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12483
– ident: e_1_2_6_58_1
  doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12206
– ident: e_1_2_6_45_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_51_1
  doi: 10.1002/edn3.23
– ident: e_1_2_6_59_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_60_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.023
– ident: e_1_2_6_26_1
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199
– ident: e_1_2_6_47_1
  doi: 10.1111/faf.12373
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179261
– ident: e_1_2_6_8_1
  doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062306
– volume-title: Environmental DNA—Toepassingsmogelijkheden voor het opsporen van (invasieve) soorten
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_6_22_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_4_1
– volume: 65
  start-page: 33
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_6_62_1
  article-title: The degrees of threat to the freshwater ichthyofauna of Poland: red list of fishes and lampreys—Situation in 2009
  publication-title: Chrońmy Przyr Ojcz
– ident: e_1_2_6_24_1
  doi: 10.3354/dao02423
– ident: e_1_2_6_39_1
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37001-y
– ident: e_1_2_6_42_1
  doi: 10.1023/A:1007681313916
– ident: e_1_2_6_63_1
  doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13055
– ident: e_1_2_6_19_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00190-3
– ident: e_1_2_6_61_1
  doi: 10.1002/nafm.10055
– ident: e_1_2_6_25_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00158.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_18_1
  doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12595
– ident: e_1_2_6_35_1
  doi: 10.1890/02-3090
– volume: 21
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_6_28_1
  article-title: Nieuwe inventarisatiemethode helpt bij behoud (beschermde) grote modderkruiper
  publication-title: H2O‐Online
– ident: e_1_2_6_11_1
  doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12735
– ident: e_1_2_6_14_1
  doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0118
– ident: e_1_2_6_41_1
  doi: 10.3996/042014-JFWM-034
– ident: e_1_2_6_3_1
  doi: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00133
– ident: e_1_2_6_29_1
  doi: 10.1139/gen-2015-0218
– ident: e_1_2_6_32_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05600.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_5_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.05.008
– ident: e_1_2_6_40_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01000.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_53_1
  doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12683
– ident: e_1_2_6_6_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157366
– ident: e_1_2_6_38_1
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50571-9
– ident: e_1_2_6_20_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_31_1
  doi: 10.1071/MF14346
– ident: e_1_2_6_15_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.bdq.2017.04.001
– ident: e_1_2_6_16_1
  doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T40698A10351495.en
– volume: 11
  start-page: 44
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_6_27_1
  article-title: Verspreiding en achteruitgang van de grote modderkruiper in een historisch perspectief
  publication-title: Ravon
– volume: 57
  start-page: 35
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_6_44_1
  article-title: Conservation status of the genus Cobitis and related genera in Croatia
  publication-title: Folia Zoologica
– ident: e_1_2_6_36_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01098.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_50_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2016.12.006
– ident: e_1_2_6_57_1
  doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12262
– ident: e_1_2_6_56_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05418.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_34_1
  doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2248:ESORWD]2.0.CO;2
– ident: e_1_2_6_23_1
  doi: 10.1021/ac202028g
– ident: e_1_2_6_46_1
  doi: 10.1080/02705060.2013.810555
– ident: e_1_2_6_7_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.370
– ident: e_1_2_6_49_1
  doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2916-3
– ident: e_1_2_6_43_1
  doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00061
– ident: e_1_2_6_30_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_12_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162277
– ident: e_1_2_6_21_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10641-009-9564-6
– ident: e_1_2_6_9_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2011.02.001
– ident: e_1_2_6_13_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112611
– ident: e_1_2_6_54_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_55_1
  doi: 10.1586/14737159.2014.901154
– ident: e_1_2_6_48_1
  doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12306
– ident: e_1_2_6_52_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.023
SSID ssj0009393
Score 2.562882
Snippet The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic...
The European weather loach ( Misgurnus fossilis ) is a cryptic and poorly known fish species of high conservation concern. The species is experiencing dramatic...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 399
SubjectTerms Animals
Aquaria
Aquariums
Belgium
conservation
cryptic species
Cypriniformes - genetics
ddPCR versus qPCR analyses
Deoxyribonucleic acid
Detection
detection limit
Dilution
DNA
droplets
Ecosystem
eDNA detection
endangered
Endangered Species
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA - analysis
Environmental DNA - genetics
Environmental Monitoring
extinction
Fish
Fish conservation
Fresh Water - chemistry
Freshwater fishes
habitats
Harbors
Harbours
Misgurnus fossilis
Monitoring
Monitoring methods
Nucleotide sequence
PCR
Population Density
Quality assessment
Quality control
Rare species
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
risk
Sampling
Sensitivity
Species extinction
Surveying
surveys
water sampling
Weather
Wildlife conservation
Title Reliable eDNA detection and quantification of the European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis)
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjfb.14315
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32154579
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2488139751
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2375873394
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2718338101
Volume 98
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ZSxxBEC5ECPiiOTw2MaETfNCHkbWPOciTRxYR9CEoiChDTR-yuMyazA6B_PpU9xyeCcG3galmerq6ur-qrvoaYENwK4w2PnJveSSLmGxu6FwkJMaeayQ1mS8UPj6JD8_k0bk6n4OvXS1Mww_RB9y8ZYT12hs4FtV9I3cFmbkIBeY-V8sDou931FGZaAl3ydmiBrxlFQpZPF3Lh3vRE4D5EK-GDWe0BJddV5s8k5vtelZs69-PWBxf-C-vYbEFomy3mTlvYM6Wb-HVxTSE2d_Blc9V9mVVzB6c7DJjZyFnq2RYGvajxibHKKiVTR0jGMm6wD771cBKNvHFWmzzeFxd08fqijkahfFkXG0tw9no2-n-YdRexRBpf_AZaZ0aoVIrpU6yVCXc8NTxWDsj9FDqFJH8FpRW6cwioksFDp2yyO2OEQnhghWYL6elXQOmYktuDPKsGKYSCU3JwnCMFdLakhmtBrDZKSXXLU-5vy5jkvf-iivyMFoD-NKL3jbkHM8JrXeazVv7rHJO65bHvmpnAJ_712RZ_rgESzutSUaQL5UIkcl_yNDWLgJJ2gBWm1nT90RwD0-TjH4o6P7vXcyPRnvh4f3_i36ABe7Ta0IC-TrMz37W9iPho1nxKRjCHzIJCdY
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1LTxRBEK4QDJGLb3QBtTWa4GHIbj_mcfCALpvlsXswkBATM_T0w2zczAqzEwK_yb_if7K65wH4ihcO3iaZSqanu6r6q66qrwFeMWqYVtqd3Bsa8CxEm-taGzAuQ8c1EuvENQqPxuHwkO8eiaMF-Nb0wlT8EO2Bm7MM76-dgbsD6atWbjO0c9ZrSir3zPkZBmzF250-ru5rSgfbB--HQX2nQKBcBi9QKtZMxIZzFSWxiKimsaWhspqpLlexlAjAJTdCJUZKaWMmu1YYSU1Ps8jTHKDDv-VuEHdM_f0Pl2RVCaspfjG8wxHSmsfI1w01Q72--_0Caa8jZL_FDe7C92ZyqsqWL5vlPNtUFz_xRv4vs3cP7tRYm2xVxnEfFkz-AJY-znwm4SF8cuXYrnOMmP54i2gz92VpOZG5JielrMqovOaSmSWIlEmTuyBnFXImU9ePRjZGk-IzfqwsiMVpn0wnxZtHcHgj_7YCi_ksN0-AiNBgpCZpknVjLhEw8kxTGQqJ7jPRSnRgo9GCVNVU7O5GkGnahmQ2S_3qdOBlK_q14h_5ndB6o0pp7YKKlKJrdvBe9Drwon2NzsNlhGRuZiXKMAwXI8YS_hcZRC_M88B14HGlpu1IGHUIPErwh7yy_XmI6e7gnX9Y_XfR53B7eDDaT_d3xntrsExdNZGvl1-HxflpaZ4iHJxnz7wVEji-acX9AedsaVw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1ZaxRBEC5CRPFF470maisK8WHCbB8z0w8-RNclh1lEDAQhjD19yOIyGzM7BP1L-Sv-KKt7Do0XvuTBt4EpmD6qqr-aqvoa4DGjlhlt_J97SyNeJGhzsXMR4yrxXCOZkb5ReG-SbO3znQNxsASnXS9Mww_R_3DzlhH8tTfwI-N-NHJXoJmzYVdRuWs_n2C8Vj3bHuHmPqF0_PLti62ovVIg0j6BF2mdGSYyy7lOZSZSamjmaKKdYTrmOlMK8bfiVmhplVIuYyp2wipqh4algeUA_f0FnsTS3xMxevOdq0qyluEXozscIW1pjELZUDfUs4ffL4j2LEAOJ9z4Knzt1qYpbPm4US-KDf3lJ9rI_2TxVuBKi7TJZmMa12DJltfh4rt5yCPcgENfjO37xogdTTaJsYtQlFYSVRryqVZNEVXQWzJ3BHEy6TIX5KTBzWTmu9HI-t60-oAfqyvicNWns2n19Cbsn8vcbsFyOS_tHSAisRinKSqLOOMK4SIvDFWJUOg8pdFiAOudEuS6JWL394HM8j4gc0UedmcAj3rRo4Z95HdCa50m5a0DqnKKjtmDezEcwMP-NboOnw9SpZ3XKMMwWEwZk_wvMohdWGCBG8DtRkv7kTDq8XcqcUJB1_48xHxn_Dw83P130Qdw6fVonL_anuyuwmXqS4lCsfwaLC-Oa3sPseCiuB9skMD789bbby1vaAs
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliable+eDNA+detection+and+quantification+of+the+European+weather+loach+%28Misgurnus+fossilis%29&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+fish+biology&rft.au=Brys%2C+Rein&rft.au=Halfmaerten%2C+David&rft.au=Neyrinck%2C+Sabrina&rft.au=Mauvisseau%2C+Quentin&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=0022-1112&rft.eissn=1095-8649&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=414&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fjfb.14315&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fjfb.14315&rft.externalDocID=JFB14315
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-1112&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-1112&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-1112&client=summon