Clinical and radiological outcomes after stand-alone ALIF for single L5-S1 degenerative discopathy using a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without bone graft

•Stand-alone L5-S1 ALIF was evaluated in 65 patients with degenerative disc disease.•ALIF was performed with a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles.•At 2-year follow-up, functional X-rays disclosed a 95.4% fusion rate.•Excellent clinical outcome (Macnab’s criteria) was reported by 75.4...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical neurology and neurosurgery Vol. 168; pp. 24 - 29
Main Authors Norotte, Gilles, Barrios, Carlos
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.05.2018
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract •Stand-alone L5-S1 ALIF was evaluated in 65 patients with degenerative disc disease.•ALIF was performed with a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles.•At 2-year follow-up, functional X-rays disclosed a 95.4% fusion rate.•Excellent clinical outcome (Macnab’s criteria) was reported by 75.4% of the patients.•No patient underwent additional surgical procedures during the period of study. Recent improvements in cage designs with integral fixation and screw attachments have made stand-alone ALIF a viable option with several possible advantages. The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without adding a bone graft for stand-alone ALIF in the treatment of L5-S1 isolated degenerative disc discopathy (DDD). Sixty-five patients who required surgery for DDD were evaluated. Clinical outcome evaluations included back and leg pain (VAS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and patient satisfaction (Macnab’s criteria). Radiological outcomes include the assessment of disc height, the L5-S1 intervertebral disc angle, and anterior intervertebral fusion through standard and functional sagittal X-rays of the lumbar spine. Clinical and radiological measurements were assessed 2, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Clinical outcomes improved progressively and stabilized from 12- to 24-month follow-up. Final postoperative ODI scores showed a notable improvement (95%CI = 36.1–48.9 points; p < .001). Similarly, 24-month postoperative VAS scores revealed a significant decrease in pain (95%CI = 5.4–6.2; p < .001). The fusion rate was 95.4%. Anterior disc height was restored from 4.1 ± 3.2 mm at baseline to 9.5 ± 1.6 mm in the immediate postoperative period (p < .001). A small collapse (17.9%) of the disc height was detected from the 2- and 24-month follow-ups. Cage subsidence (more than 3 mm collapse) was detected in 4 cases (6.2%) and was related to cage size (more than 11 mm height; P < .05). There were no serious bone substitute-related adverse events and no revision surgeries. Stand–alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without an autologous bone graft is an effective and safe treatment option for L5-S1 degenerative pathology. Clinical outcomes were very satisfactory with a high fusion rate.
AbstractList Recent improvements in cage designs with integral fixation and screw attachments have made stand-alone ALIF a viable option with several possible advantages. The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without adding a bone graft for stand-alone ALIF in the treatment of L5-S1 isolated degenerative disc discopathy (DDD). Sixty-five patients who required surgery for DDD were evaluated. Clinical outcome evaluations included back and leg pain (VAS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and patient satisfaction (Macnab's criteria). Radiological outcomes include the assessment of disc height, the L5-S1 intervertebral disc angle, and anterior intervertebral fusion through standard and functional sagittal X-rays of the lumbar spine. Clinical and radiological measurements were assessed 2, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Clinical outcomes improved progressively and stabilized from 12- to 24-month follow-up. Final postoperative ODI scores showed a notable improvement (95%CI = 36.1-48.9 points; p < .001). Similarly, 24-month postoperative VAS scores revealed a significant decrease in pain (95%CI = 5.4-6.2; p < .001). The fusion rate was 95.4%. Anterior disc height was restored from 4.1 ± 3.2 mm at baseline to 9.5 ± 1.6 mm in the immediate postoperative period (p < .001). A small collapse (17.9%) of the disc height was detected from the 2- and 24-month follow-ups. Cage subsidence (more than 3 mm collapse) was detected in 4 cases (6.2%) and was related to cage size (more than 11 mm height; P < .05). There were no serious bone substitute-related adverse events and no revision surgeries. Stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without an autologous bone graft is an effective and safe treatment option for L5-S1 degenerative pathology. Clinical outcomes were very satisfactory with a high fusion rate.
Recent improvements in cage designs with integral fixation and screw attachments have made stand-alone ALIF a viable option with several possible advantages. The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without adding a bone graft for stand-alone ALIF in the treatment of L5-S1 isolated degenerative disc discopathy (DDD).OBJECTIVERecent improvements in cage designs with integral fixation and screw attachments have made stand-alone ALIF a viable option with several possible advantages. The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without adding a bone graft for stand-alone ALIF in the treatment of L5-S1 isolated degenerative disc discopathy (DDD).Sixty-five patients who required surgery for DDD were evaluated. Clinical outcome evaluations included back and leg pain (VAS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and patient satisfaction (Macnab's criteria). Radiological outcomes include the assessment of disc height, the L5-S1 intervertebral disc angle, and anterior intervertebral fusion through standard and functional sagittal X-rays of the lumbar spine. Clinical and radiological measurements were assessed 2, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.PATIENTS AND METHODSSixty-five patients who required surgery for DDD were evaluated. Clinical outcome evaluations included back and leg pain (VAS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and patient satisfaction (Macnab's criteria). Radiological outcomes include the assessment of disc height, the L5-S1 intervertebral disc angle, and anterior intervertebral fusion through standard and functional sagittal X-rays of the lumbar spine. Clinical and radiological measurements were assessed 2, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.Clinical outcomes improved progressively and stabilized from 12- to 24-month follow-up. Final postoperative ODI scores showed a notable improvement (95%CI = 36.1-48.9 points; p < .001). Similarly, 24-month postoperative VAS scores revealed a significant decrease in pain (95%CI = 5.4-6.2; p < .001). The fusion rate was 95.4%. Anterior disc height was restored from 4.1 ± 3.2 mm at baseline to 9.5 ± 1.6 mm in the immediate postoperative period (p < .001). A small collapse (17.9%) of the disc height was detected from the 2- and 24-month follow-ups. Cage subsidence (more than 3 mm collapse) was detected in 4 cases (6.2%) and was related to cage size (more than 11 mm height; P < .05). There were no serious bone substitute-related adverse events and no revision surgeries.RESULTSClinical outcomes improved progressively and stabilized from 12- to 24-month follow-up. Final postoperative ODI scores showed a notable improvement (95%CI = 36.1-48.9 points; p < .001). Similarly, 24-month postoperative VAS scores revealed a significant decrease in pain (95%CI = 5.4-6.2; p < .001). The fusion rate was 95.4%. Anterior disc height was restored from 4.1 ± 3.2 mm at baseline to 9.5 ± 1.6 mm in the immediate postoperative period (p < .001). A small collapse (17.9%) of the disc height was detected from the 2- and 24-month follow-ups. Cage subsidence (more than 3 mm collapse) was detected in 4 cases (6.2%) and was related to cage size (more than 11 mm height; P < .05). There were no serious bone substitute-related adverse events and no revision surgeries.Stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without an autologous bone graft is an effective and safe treatment option for L5-S1 degenerative pathology. Clinical outcomes were very satisfactory with a high fusion rate.CONCLUSIONStand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without an autologous bone graft is an effective and safe treatment option for L5-S1 degenerative pathology. Clinical outcomes were very satisfactory with a high fusion rate.
•Stand-alone L5-S1 ALIF was evaluated in 65 patients with degenerative disc disease.•ALIF was performed with a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles.•At 2-year follow-up, functional X-rays disclosed a 95.4% fusion rate.•Excellent clinical outcome (Macnab’s criteria) was reported by 75.4% of the patients.•No patient underwent additional surgical procedures during the period of study. Recent improvements in cage designs with integral fixation and screw attachments have made stand-alone ALIF a viable option with several possible advantages. The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without adding a bone graft for stand-alone ALIF in the treatment of L5-S1 isolated degenerative disc discopathy (DDD). Sixty-five patients who required surgery for DDD were evaluated. Clinical outcome evaluations included back and leg pain (VAS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and patient satisfaction (Macnab’s criteria). Radiological outcomes include the assessment of disc height, the L5-S1 intervertebral disc angle, and anterior intervertebral fusion through standard and functional sagittal X-rays of the lumbar spine. Clinical and radiological measurements were assessed 2, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Clinical outcomes improved progressively and stabilized from 12- to 24-month follow-up. Final postoperative ODI scores showed a notable improvement (95%CI = 36.1–48.9 points; p < .001). Similarly, 24-month postoperative VAS scores revealed a significant decrease in pain (95%CI = 5.4–6.2; p < .001). The fusion rate was 95.4%. Anterior disc height was restored from 4.1 ± 3.2 mm at baseline to 9.5 ± 1.6 mm in the immediate postoperative period (p < .001). A small collapse (17.9%) of the disc height was detected from the 2- and 24-month follow-ups. Cage subsidence (more than 3 mm collapse) was detected in 4 cases (6.2%) and was related to cage size (more than 11 mm height; P < .05). There were no serious bone substitute-related adverse events and no revision surgeries. Stand–alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without an autologous bone graft is an effective and safe treatment option for L5-S1 degenerative pathology. Clinical outcomes were very satisfactory with a high fusion rate.
ObjectiveRecent improvements in cage designs with integral fixation and screw attachments have made stand-alone ALIF a viable option with several possible advantages. The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without adding a bone graft for stand-alone ALIF in the treatment of L5-S1 isolated degenerative disc discopathy (DDD).Patients and methodsSixty-five patients who required surgery for DDD were evaluated. Clinical outcome evaluations included back and leg pain (VAS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and patient satisfaction (Macnab’s criteria). Radiological outcomes include the assessment of disc height, the L5-S1 intervertebral disc angle, and anterior intervertebral fusion through standard and functional sagittal X-rays of the lumbar spine. Clinical and radiological measurements were assessed 2, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.ResultsClinical outcomes improved progressively and stabilized from 12- to 24-month follow-up. Final postoperative ODI scores showed a notable improvement (95%CI = 36.1–48.9 points; p < .001). Similarly, 24-month postoperative VAS scores revealed a significant decrease in pain (95%CI = 5.4–6.2; p < .001). The fusion rate was 95.4%. Anterior disc height was restored from 4.1 ± 3.2 mm at baseline to 9.5 ± 1.6 mm in the immediate postoperative period (p < .001). A small collapse (17.9%) of the disc height was detected from the 2- and 24-month follow-ups. Cage subsidence (more than 3 mm collapse) was detected in 4 cases (6.2%) and was related to cage size (more than 11 mm height; P < .05). There were no serious bone substitute-related adverse events and no revision surgeries.ConclusionStand–alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without an autologous bone graft is an effective and safe treatment option for L5-S1 degenerative pathology. Clinical outcomes were very satisfactory with a high fusion rate.
Author Barrios, Carlos
Norotte, Gilles
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Gilles
  surname: Norotte
  fullname: Norotte, Gilles
  email: gilles-norotte@wanadoo.fr
  organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal des Alpes du Sud, 05000, Gap, France
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Carlos
  surname: Barrios
  fullname: Barrios, Carlos
  email: carlos.barrios@ucv.es
  organization: Institute for Research on Musculoskeletal Disorders, Valencia Catholic University, Quevedo 2, 46001, Valencia, Spain
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29505978$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNks9uEzEQxi1URNPCK1SWuHDZMN4_XkdCiCpKoSISSMB55bVnEwfHDra3kLfiEXFIyqGXcrI0-n3fzHzjC3LmvENCrhhMGTD-ejNV1jgcg5-WwMQU2BSq9gmZMNGWBZ9xcUYmUEFViJq35-Qixg0AVBUXz8h5OWugmbViQn7Ps41R0lLpNA1SG2_96m_Bj0n5LUYqh4SBxpSJQto8B71e3t7QweeicSuLdNkUXxjVuEKHQSZzh1SbqPxOpvWejgeKSvp5sfhIlVwhHYy1qOlPk9Z0vdfB_9rLzJqE1EmXZSEZZXPrA5HnoP2h6yrkSZ6Tp4O0EV-c3kvy7Wbxdf6hWH56fzu_XhaqblgqBDRDXretleqB13WtayV0CTA0SvQCelZX0ErFSym4lC2KRgMy3ktW9hpm1SV5dfTdBf9jxJi6bd4IrZUO_Ri7nDorW2h4ndGXD9CNH4PL02WqzFk3M1Fm6upEjf0WdbcLZivDvru_RQb4EVDBxxhw-Icw6A5H7zbd_dEP7UUHrMsrZuGbB0JlUk7TuxSksY_L3x3lmOO8Mxi6qAw6hdoEVKnT3jxu8faBhTp9q--4_x-DP3zT5CE
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s10143_024_02551_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcot_2021_07_016
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_022_07516_0
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_55139
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12306_019_00634_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jos_2021_07_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_inat_2021_101312
crossref_primary_10_14245_ns_2143236_618
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spinee_2020_05_555
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spinee_2021_07_016
crossref_primary_10_1097_BSD_0000000000001227
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bas_2022_100924
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40634_022_00496_6
Cites_doi 10.3171/2014.9.SPINE131151
10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182263d91
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d81ef2
10.1007/s00402-012-1546-z
10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.013
10.1007/s00586-004-0817-y
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ef5c14
10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017
10.1016/j.spinee.2010.07.005
10.2106/00004623-197153050-00004
10.1016/j.wneu.2010.02.057
10.1177/2192568217699210
10.1097/BSD.0000000000000356
10.1007/s00776-011-0088-5
10.1111/os.12030
10.1016/j.spinee.2006.10.015
10.1007/s10143-013-0483-9
10.1016/j.spinee.2011.04.023
10.1097/01.BRS.0000067093.47584.CA
10.1097/00002517-200104000-00001
10.1007/s00586-013-2948-5
10.1111/os.12048
10.1097/01.BRS.0000134570.08901.30
10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.03.008
10.1097/01.bsd.0000133509.99670.95
10.3340/jkns.2010.47.5.352
10.1007/s00586-004-0722-4
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Copyright Elsevier Limited May 2018
Copyright_xml – notice: 2018 Elsevier B.V.
– notice: Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
– notice: Copyright Elsevier Limited May 2018
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7TK
7X7
7XB
88E
88G
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8G5
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
GUQSH
K9.
M0S
M1P
M2M
M2O
MBDVC
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PSYQQ
Q9U
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Neurosciences Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Psychology Database (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Psychology Database
Proquest Research Library
Research Library (Corporate)
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest One Psychology
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni)
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest Psychology Journals
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic

ProQuest One Psychology

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1872-6968
EndPage 29
ExternalDocumentID 29505978
10_1016_j_clineuro_2018_01_037
S030384671830043X
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations France
GeographicLocations_xml – name: France
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
29B
3O-
4.4
457
4CK
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6J9
7-5
71M
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
8G5
8P~
9JM
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXLA
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABCQJ
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABUWG
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACIUM
ACPRK
ACRLP
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFKRA
AFPUW
AFRAH
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGWIK
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AHMBA
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRLJ
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
AZQEC
BENPR
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CCPQU
CS3
DU5
DWQXO
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EMOBN
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
FYUFA
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HDW
HMCUK
HMK
HMO
HMQ
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
LX8
M1P
M29
M2M
M2O
M2V
M41
MO0
MOBAO
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OQ-
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PG~
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PSYQQ
PUEGO
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SNS
SPCBC
SSH
SSN
SSZ
SV3
T5K
UKHRP
UNMZH
WUQ
Z5R
ZGI
~G-
3V.
AACTN
AADPK
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AFKWA
AJBFU
AJOXV
AMFUW
EFLBG
LCYCR
RIG
AAYXX
AFCTW
AGRNS
ALIPV
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7TK
7XB
8FK
K9.
MBDVC
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-805f00374ccb06444d4c8d200f5c8b80b14307ac62a86aa7e85d0e16ba12bd093
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 0303-8467
1872-6968
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 09:26:44 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 13 05:53:32 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:35:14 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:30 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:08:50 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:34:06 EST 2024
Tue Aug 26 16:33:29 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Spine fusion
Hydroxyapatite
Subsidence
ALIF
PEEK cage
Language English
License Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c451t-805f00374ccb06444d4c8d200f5c8b80b14307ac62a86aa7e85d0e16ba12bd093
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
PMID 29505978
PQID 2022955982
PQPubID 1226360
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2011270564
proquest_journals_2022955982
pubmed_primary_29505978
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clineuro_2018_01_037
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_clineuro_2018_01_037
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_clineuro_2018_01_037
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_clineuro_2018_01_037
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate May 2018
2018-05-00
20180501
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2018
  text: May 2018
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Netherlands
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Netherlands
– name: Assen
PublicationTitle Clinical neurology and neurosurgery
PublicationTitleAlternate Clin Neurol Neurosurg
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Elsevier Limited
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
– name: Elsevier Limited
References Teng, Han, Phan, Mobbs (bib0090) 2017; 44
Mobbs, Maharaj, Rao (bib0060) 2014; 21
Strube, Hoff, Hartwig, Perka, Gross, Putzier (bib0015) 2012; 25
Carragee, Hurwitz, Weiner (bib0070) 2011; 11
Li, Dumonski, Liu, Lipman, Hong, Yang, Jin, Ren, Limthongkul, Bessey, Thalgott, Gebauer, Albert, Vaccaro (bib0135) 2010; 35
Ohtori, Koshi, Yamashita, Takaso, Yamauchi, Inoue (bib0025) 2011; 16
Mannion, Nowitzke, Wood (bib0065) 2011; 11
Udby, Bech-Azeddine (bib0140) 2015; 133
Viglione, Chamoli, Diwan (bib0100) 2017; 7
Phillips, Cunningham, Carandang, Ghanayem, Voronov, Havey, Patwardhan (bib0125) 2004; 29
Fairbank, Pynsent (bib0105) 2000; 25
Mobbs, Loganathan, Yeung, Rao (bib0020) 2013; 4
Slosar, Josey, Reynolds (bib0110) 2007; 7
Ishihara, Osada, Kanamori, Kawaguchi, Ohmori, Kimura (bib0040) 2001; 14
Schroeder, Kepler, Millhouse, Fleischman, Maltenfort, Bateman, Vaccaro (bib0085) 2016; 29
Choi, Sung (bib0120) 2006; 15
Cheung, Zhang, Lu, Luk, Leong (bib0035) 2003; 28
Chau, Xu, Wong, Mobbs (bib0055) 2014; 37
Motosuneya, Asazuma, Nobuta, Masuoka, Ichimura, Fujikawa (bib0045) 2005; 18
Mroz, Jc, Hashimoto, Norvell (bib0075) 2010; 35
Macnab (bib0080) 1971; 53
Kim, Kim, Lee, Park, Hwang, Cheh (bib0010) 2010; 73
Ajiboye, Alas, Mosich, Sharma, Pourtaheri (bib0095) 2017; 15
Behrbalk, Uri, Parks, Musson, Soh Cheong, Boszczyk (bib0115) 2013; 22
Mobbs, Chung, Rao (bib0030) 2013; 5
Saraph, Lerch, Walochnik, Bach, Krismer, Wimmer (bib0050) 2004; 13
Cho, Ryu, Park (bib0130) 2010; 47
Jiang, Chen, Jiang (bib0005) 2012; 132
Motosuneya (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0045) 2005; 18
Phillips (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0125) 2004; 29
Cheung (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0035) 2003; 28
Schroeder (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0085) 2016; 29
Slosar (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0110) 2007; 7
Behrbalk (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0115) 2013; 22
Kim (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0010) 2010; 73
Carragee (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0070) 2011; 11
Ohtori (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0025) 2011; 16
Ishihara (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0040) 2001; 14
Udby (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0140) 2015; 133
Mroz (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0075) 2010; 35
Ajiboye (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0095) 2017; 15
Strube (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0015) 2012; 25
Mobbs (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0020) 2013; 4
Viglione (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0100) 2017; 7
Mobbs (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0060) 2014; 21
Fairbank (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0105) 2000; 25
Cho (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0130) 2010; 47
Choi (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0120) 2006; 15
Chau (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0055) 2014; 37
Jiang (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0005) 2012; 132
Macnab (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0080) 1971; 53
Mobbs (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0030) 2013; 5
Mannion (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0065) 2011; 11
Li (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0135) 2010; 35
Teng (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0090) 2017; 44
Saraph (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0050) 2004; 13
References_xml – volume: 4
  start-page: 153
  year: 2013
  end-page: 163
  ident: bib0020
  article-title: Indications for anterior lumbar interbody fusion
  publication-title: Orthop. Surg.
– volume: 18
  start-page: 18
  year: 2005
  end-page: 22
  ident: bib0045
  article-title: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: changes in area of the dural tube, disc height, and prevalence of cauda equina adhesion in magnetic resonance images
  publication-title: J. Spinal Disord. Tech.
– volume: 13
  start-page: 425
  year: 2004
  end-page: 443
  ident: bib0050
  article-title: Comparison of conventional versus minimally invasive extraperitoneal approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion
  publication-title: Eur. Spine J.
– volume: 15
  start-page: 16
  year: 2006
  end-page: 22
  ident: bib0120
  article-title: Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages
  publication-title: Eur. Spine J.
– volume: 15
  year: 2017
  ident: bib0095
  article-title: Radiographic and clinical outcomes of anterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions. A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
  publication-title: Clin. Spine Surg.
– volume: 11
  start-page: 527
  year: 2011
  end-page: 533
  ident: bib0065
  article-title: Promoting fusion in minimally invasive lumbar interbody stabilization with low-dose bone morphogenic protein-2—but what is the cost?
  publication-title: Spine J.
– volume: 14
  start-page: 91
  year: 2001
  end-page: 99
  ident: bib0040
  article-title: Minimum 10-year follow-up study of anterior lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis
  publication-title: J. Spinal Disord.
– volume: 11
  start-page: 471
  year: 2011
  end-page: 491
  ident: bib0070
  article-title: A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: emerging safety concerns and lessons learned
  publication-title: Spine J.
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1385
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1389
  ident: bib0035
  article-title: Reduction of disc space distraction after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous iliac crest graft
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 29
  start-page: 150
  year: 2016
  end-page: 155
  ident: bib0085
  article-title: L5/S1 fusion rates in degenerative spine surgery: a systematic review comparing ALIF, TLIF, and axial interbody arthrodesis
  publication-title: Clin. Spine Surg.
– volume: 133
  start-page: 64
  year: 2015
  end-page: 69
  ident: bib0140
  article-title: Clinical outcome of stand-alone ALIF compared to posterior instrumentation for degenerative disc disease: a pilot study and a literature review
  publication-title: Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg.
– volume: 25
  start-page: 362
  year: 2012
  end-page: 369
  ident: bib0015
  article-title: Stand-alone anterior versus anteroposterior lumbar interbody single-level fusion after a mean follow-up of 41 months
  publication-title: J. Spinal Disord. Tech.
– volume: 53
  start-page: 891
  year: 1971
  end-page: 903
  ident: bib0080
  article-title: Negative disc exploration: an analysis of the cause of nerve root involvement in sixty-eight patients
  publication-title: J. Bone Jt. Surg. (Am.)
– volume: 37
  start-page: 23
  year: 2014
  end-page: 37
  ident: bib0055
  article-title: Current status of bone graft options for anterior interbody fusion of the cervical and lumbar spine
  publication-title: Neurosurg. Rev.
– volume: 25
  start-page: 2940
  year: 2000
  end-page: 2952
  ident: bib0105
  article-title: The Oswestry disability index
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 73
  start-page: 565
  year: 2010
  end-page: 571
  ident: bib0010
  article-title: Comparison study of the instrumented circumferential fusion with instru-mented anterior lumbar interbody fusion as a surgical procedure for adultlow-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis
  publication-title: World Neurosurg.
– volume: 5
  start-page: 77
  year: 2013
  end-page: 85
  ident: bib0030
  article-title: Bone graft substitutes for anterior lumbar interbody fusion
  publication-title: Orthop. Surg.
– volume: 47
  start-page: 352
  year: 2010
  end-page: 357
  ident: bib0130
  article-title: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with stand-alone interbody cage in treatment of lumbar intervertebral foraminal stenosis: comparative study of two different types of cages
  publication-title: J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc.
– volume: 35
  start-page: S86
  year: 2010
  end-page: S104
  ident: bib0075
  article-title: Complications related to osteobiologics use in spine surgery: a systematic review
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 7
  start-page: 301
  year: 2007
  end-page: 307
  ident: bib0110
  article-title: Accelerating lumbar fusions by combining rhBMP-2 with allograft bone: a prospective analysis of interbody fusion rates and clinical outcomes
  publication-title: Spine J.
– volume: 44
  start-page: 11
  year: 2017
  end-page: 17
  ident: bib0090
  article-title: A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF
  publication-title: J. Clin. Neurosci.
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1564
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1570
  ident: bib0135
  article-title: A multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a stand-alone anterior carbon I/F cage for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: two-year results from a food and drug administration investigational device exemption clinical trial
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1731
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1736
  ident: bib0125
  article-title: Effect of supplemental translaminar facet screw fixation on the stability of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion cages under physiologic compressive preloads
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 7
  start-page: 587
  year: 2017
  end-page: 595
  ident: bib0100
  article-title: Is stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion a safe and efficacious treatment for isthmic spondylolisthesis of L5-S1?
  publication-title: Glob. Spine J.
– volume: 132
  start-page: 1259
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1266
  ident: bib0005
  article-title: Which procedure is better for lum-bar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminallumbar interbody fusion?
  publication-title: Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.
– volume: 21
  start-page: 867
  year: 2014
  end-page: 876
  ident: bib0060
  article-title: Clinical outcomes and fusion rates following anterior lumbar interbody fusion with bone graft substitute i-FACTOR, an anorganic bone matrix/P-15 composite
  publication-title: J. Neurosurg. Spine
– volume: 16
  start-page: 352
  year: 2011
  end-page: 358
  ident: bib0025
  article-title: Single-level instrumented posterolateral fusión versus non-instrumented anterior interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective study with a 2-year follow-up
  publication-title: J. Orthop. Sci.
– volume: 22
  start-page: 2869
  year: 2013
  end-page: 2875
  ident: bib0115
  article-title: Fusion and subsidence rate of stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using PEEK cage with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2
  publication-title: Eur. Spine J.
– volume: 15
  issue: June
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0095
  article-title: Radiographic and clinical outcomes of anterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions. A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
  publication-title: Clin. Spine Surg.
– volume: 21
  start-page: 867
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0060
  article-title: Clinical outcomes and fusion rates following anterior lumbar interbody fusion with bone graft substitute i-FACTOR, an anorganic bone matrix/P-15 composite
  publication-title: J. Neurosurg. Spine
  doi: 10.3171/2014.9.SPINE131151
– volume: 25
  start-page: 362
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0015
  article-title: Stand-alone anterior versus anteroposterior lumbar interbody single-level fusion after a mean follow-up of 41 months
  publication-title: J. Spinal Disord. Tech.
  doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182263d91
– volume: 35
  start-page: S86
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0075
  article-title: Complications related to osteobiologics use in spine surgery: a systematic review
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d81ef2
– volume: 132
  start-page: 1259
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0005
  article-title: Which procedure is better for lum-bar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminallumbar interbody fusion?
  publication-title: Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.
  doi: 10.1007/s00402-012-1546-z
– volume: 44
  start-page: 11
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0090
  article-title: A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF
  publication-title: J. Clin. Neurosci.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.013
– volume: 15
  start-page: 16
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0120
  article-title: Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages
  publication-title: Eur. Spine J.
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0817-y
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1564
  issue: 26
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0135
  article-title: A multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a stand-alone anterior carbon I/F cage for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: two-year results from a food and drug administration investigational device exemption clinical trial
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ef5c14
– volume: 25
  start-page: 2940
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0105
  article-title: The Oswestry disability index
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017
– volume: 11
  start-page: 527
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0065
  article-title: Promoting fusion in minimally invasive lumbar interbody stabilization with low-dose bone morphogenic protein-2—but what is the cost?
  publication-title: Spine J.
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.07.005
– volume: 53
  start-page: 891
  year: 1971
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0080
  article-title: Negative disc exploration: an analysis of the cause of nerve root involvement in sixty-eight patients
  publication-title: J. Bone Jt. Surg. (Am.)
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-197153050-00004
– volume: 73
  start-page: 565
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0010
  article-title: Comparison study of the instrumented circumferential fusion with instru-mented anterior lumbar interbody fusion as a surgical procedure for adultlow-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis
  publication-title: World Neurosurg.
  doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.02.057
– volume: 7
  start-page: 587
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0100
  article-title: Is stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion a safe and efficacious treatment for isthmic spondylolisthesis of L5-S1?
  publication-title: Glob. Spine J.
  doi: 10.1177/2192568217699210
– volume: 29
  start-page: 150
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0085
  article-title: L5/S1 fusion rates in degenerative spine surgery: a systematic review comparing ALIF, TLIF, and axial interbody arthrodesis
  publication-title: Clin. Spine Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000356
– volume: 16
  start-page: 352
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0025
  article-title: Single-level instrumented posterolateral fusión versus non-instrumented anterior interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective study with a 2-year follow-up
  publication-title: J. Orthop. Sci.
  doi: 10.1007/s00776-011-0088-5
– volume: 5
  start-page: 77
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0030
  article-title: Bone graft substitutes for anterior lumbar interbody fusion
  publication-title: Orthop. Surg.
  doi: 10.1111/os.12030
– volume: 7
  start-page: 301
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0110
  article-title: Accelerating lumbar fusions by combining rhBMP-2 with allograft bone: a prospective analysis of interbody fusion rates and clinical outcomes
  publication-title: Spine J.
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.10.015
– volume: 37
  start-page: 23
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0055
  article-title: Current status of bone graft options for anterior interbody fusion of the cervical and lumbar spine
  publication-title: Neurosurg. Rev.
  doi: 10.1007/s10143-013-0483-9
– volume: 11
  start-page: 471
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0070
  article-title: A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: emerging safety concerns and lessons learned
  publication-title: Spine J.
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.04.023
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1385
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0035
  article-title: Reduction of disc space distraction after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous iliac crest graft
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067093.47584.CA
– volume: 14
  start-page: 91
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0040
  article-title: Minimum 10-year follow-up study of anterior lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis
  publication-title: J. Spinal Disord.
  doi: 10.1097/00002517-200104000-00001
– volume: 22
  start-page: 2869
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0115
  article-title: Fusion and subsidence rate of stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using PEEK cage with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2
  publication-title: Eur. Spine J.
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2948-5
– volume: 4
  start-page: 153
  issue: 5
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0020
  article-title: Indications for anterior lumbar interbody fusion
  publication-title: Orthop. Surg.
  doi: 10.1111/os.12048
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1731
  issue: 16
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0125
  article-title: Effect of supplemental translaminar facet screw fixation on the stability of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion cages under physiologic compressive preloads
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000134570.08901.30
– volume: 133
  start-page: 64
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0140
  article-title: Clinical outcome of stand-alone ALIF compared to posterior instrumentation for degenerative disc disease: a pilot study and a literature review
  publication-title: Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg.
  doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.03.008
– volume: 18
  start-page: 18
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0045
  article-title: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: changes in area of the dural tube, disc height, and prevalence of cauda equina adhesion in magnetic resonance images
  publication-title: J. Spinal Disord. Tech.
  doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000133509.99670.95
– volume: 47
  start-page: 352
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0130
  article-title: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with stand-alone interbody cage in treatment of lumbar intervertebral foraminal stenosis: comparative study of two different types of cages
  publication-title: J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc.
  doi: 10.3340/jkns.2010.47.5.352
– volume: 13
  start-page: 425
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0050
  article-title: Comparison of conventional versus minimally invasive extraperitoneal approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion
  publication-title: Eur. Spine J.
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0722-4
SSID ssj0003368
Score 2.271877
Snippet •Stand-alone L5-S1 ALIF was evaluated in 65 patients with degenerative disc disease.•ALIF was performed with a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite...
Recent improvements in cage designs with integral fixation and screw attachments have made stand-alone ALIF a viable option with several possible advantages....
ObjectiveRecent improvements in cage designs with integral fixation and screw attachments have made stand-alone ALIF a viable option with several possible...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 24
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
ALIF
Autografts
Bone grafts
Bone Screws
Bone Transplantation - adverse effects
Durapatite - therapeutic use
Ethics
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Human subjects
Humans
Hydroxyapatite
Internal Fixators
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration - surgery
Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery
Intervertebral discs
Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Nanoparticles
Neurology
Pain
Patient satisfaction
Patients
PEEK cage
Skin & tissue grafts
Spinal Fusion - adverse effects
Spine (lumbar)
Spine fusion
Subsidence
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
X-rays
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Lb9QwELagSIgLopTHQqkGqddAnMSx94QqtKs-ERJU2pvl2M5CtUrKbvbQf8VPZMZxAgdKOSeTOJrxzJfxNzOMHWZGeFd7RG4Kt1sx5SKZpt4knMvclmhj1lJq4OJTeXxZnC7EIibcNpFWOfjE4KhdaylHTj_pGXVLU9mH6x8JTY2i09U4QuM-e0Cty4jSJRfjD1ea56EUDu04TyjO_lEhfPWOKg-p_wXRu1Ro3Umz0P8enG4DnyEIzZ-wxxE9wlGv7l12zzdP2cOLeD6-x37GNp8rMI2DtXHfB98G7bbDD_UbCFPBIaQQErNqGw9H5ydzQPAKlDdYeTgXyRcOzi9DS2ryh0DFuy1NL74BYsovwcDn2ewMLLojqKme0AGldOHbjSNijCGiduehMQ2KRfJduAPXARW9dbnGlTxjl_PZ14_HSZzJkNhC8A4DmqhDzxprK0QzReEKqxxutVpYVam0QvyVSmPLzKjSGOmVcKnnZWV4Vrl0mj9nOw2-5CUDBDLcS1nLtKwLl-dV7lHJlk6RlROlmTAxKEPb2LCc5mas9MBMu9KDEjUpUadc49Im7P0od9237LhTQg661kNBKrpQjVHlTsnpKBkhSw9F_kt2fzArHR3HRv828wl7O17GLU_nOKbx7Zbu4cQXEGUxYS96cxw_FIURMEv16t8Pf80e0Up65uY-2-nWW_8G0VVXHYQt9As8nSUF
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Clinical and radiological outcomes after stand-alone ALIF for single L5-S1 degenerative discopathy using a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without bone graft
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S030384671830043X
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29505978
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2022955982
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2011270564
Volume 168
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3fa9swEBalg7GXsd_L1pUb7NWNZUuW85iWhHRtQ1lXyJuRJTlLCU5JnYe-7G_an9g7Wc42aOlgLwmxdfgcne4-pO_uGPuSaOls5RC55bjcxIDLaBA7HXGuUpOhjRlDWwNn02xyKb7O5GyHHXW5MESrDL6_9eneW4cr_fBv9q8Xi_4FmmdK0RONks6zZpTBLhRZ-cHP3zSPNPXpcDQ4otF_ZAlfHVD2IdXAIIpX7st3Uj_0-wPUQwDUB6LxC_Y8IEgYtkq-ZDuufsWenoUz8tfsVyj1uQRdW1hru-j8G6w2Db6nuwHfGRz8NkKkl6vawfD0eAwIYIH2DpYOTmV0wcG6uS9LTT4RKIF3RR2Mb4HY8nPQcD4anYBBlwQV5RRaoG1d-HFriRyjiazdOKh1jWKBgOdHoB5Q0lPna9TkDbscj74fTaLQlyEyQvIGg5qsfN0aY0pENEJYYXKLy62SJi_zuEQMFittskTnmdbK5dLGjmel5klp40H6lu3W-JD3DBDMcKdUpeKsEjZNy9QlcWLoJDm3MtM9JrvJKEwoWk69M5ZFx067KrpJLGgSi5gXqFqP9bdy123ZjkclVDfXRZeUim60wMjyqORgK_mX6f6T7F5nVkVwHjd4n3qsU2XFHvu8vY3Lns5ydO1WGxrDiTMgM9Fj71pz3L4oCiNoVvmH_1DsI3tGv1pq5x7bbdYb9wnhV1Pu-_WFn2qm9tmT4fHJZIrfh6Pp-bc7bNszxw
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lj9MwELZWXQm4IN4UFhgkOAbycuIeEFqgVUsfWsGutDfj2E5hVSVLmwr1TyF-IjNJHDgAy2XPzTRuZ-bz5_E8GHsWKm5NbpG5CXS3eBBwb-Bb5QVBGukEbUxrCg3MF8n4JH5_yk_32HdXC0NplQ4Ta6A2paYYOR3SQ-qWJsLX5189mhpFt6tuhEZjFlO7-4ZHts2ryTvU7_MwHA2P3469dqqAp2MeVAjJPK-7rmid4X4cxybWwqCx5FyLTPgZMgg_VToJlUiUSq3gxrdBkqkgzEzdfAkhfz-O8CjTY_tvhoujDx32R1FdfIeeE3m0s_9Wk3z2gmodqeMGJZSJulkoTV__83b4N7pbb3ujG-x6y1fhsDGwm2zPFrfYlXl7I3-b_Wgbi65AFQbWynxxaArltsK_1m6gnkMOddDCU6uysHA4m4wA6TJQpGJlYca9jwEYu6ybYBMCA5ULlzQveQeUm78EBUfD4RQ0AiDkVMFogILI8HlnKBVHUWp4ZaFQBYq16X71E7gOyOityzWu5A47uRR93WW9Al9ynwFSp8CmaZ76SR6bKMoii2al6d5aGJ6oPuNOGVK3LdJpUsdKuly4M-mUKEmJ0g8kLq3PXnZy502TkAslUqdr6UpgEbQl7mMXSg46yZYkNeTnv2QPnFnJFqo28pdj9dnT7mMEGbo5UoUtt_RMQBkKPIn77F5jjt0PRWGk6Kl48O8vf8Kujo_nMzmbLKYP2TVaVZM3esB61XprHyG3q7LHrUMB-3TZPvwTUuJiXA
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEF5VRaq4IN4ECgwSHE29ttfrHBCqaKKGpFUlqJTbst5dB6rILokjlH_FmV_HzPoBB6Bceo4n3mQe--3sNzOMvYy0cLZwiNwydLdkyEUwDJ0OOJexSdHGjKHUwMlpenyevJ-L-Q770dXCEK2yi4k-UNvKUI6cDukRdUvLooOipUWcHY3fXn4NaIIU3bR24zQaE5m67Tc8vq3fTI5Q16-iaDz6-O44aCcMBCYRvMbwLArfgcWYHPfmJLGJySwaTiFMlmdhjmgilNqkkc5SraXLhA0dT3PNo9z6RkwY_m_IWHDyMTnvD3thHPsyPPShOKA9_rfq5IvXVPVIvTeIWpb5tqE0h_3PG-PfgK_fAMe32a0WucJhY2p32I4r77K9k_Zu_h773rYYXYIuLay0_dLFVag2Nf7Jbg1-Ijn49EWgl1Xp4HA2GQMCZ6CcxdLBTAQfOFi38O2wKRYDFQ5XNDl5C8TSX4CGs9FoCgZDIRRUy2iB0snweWuJlKOJJF47KHWJYi3xzz-B64Cc3rpY4Urus_Nr0dYDtlviSx4xQBDFnZSFDNMisXGcxw4NzNANdmZFqgdMdMpQpm2WTjM7lqpjxV2oTomKlKhCrnBpA3bQy1027UKulJCdrlVXDIvhW-GOdqXksJds4VIDg_5Ldr8zK9UGrbX65WID9qL_GMMN3SHp0lUbeoYTV0GkyYA9bMyx_6EojGBdZo___eXP2R56rppNTqdP2E1aVEMg3We79WrjniLIq_Nn3puAfbpu9_0JyfZlLA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+and+radiological+outcomes+after+stand-alone+ALIF+for+single+L5-S1+degenerative+discopathy+using+a+PEEK+cage+filled+with+hydroxyapatite+nanoparticles+without+bone+graft&rft.jtitle=Clinical+neurology+and+neurosurgery&rft.au=Norotte%2C+Gilles&rft.au=Barrios%2C+Carlos&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+B.V&rft.issn=0303-8467&rft.eissn=1872-6968&rft.volume=168&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=29&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.clineuro.2018.01.037&rft.externalDocID=S030384671830043X
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0303-8467&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0303-8467&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0303-8467&client=summon