Clinical and radiological outcomes after stand-alone ALIF for single L5-S1 degenerative discopathy using a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without bone graft
•Stand-alone L5-S1 ALIF was evaluated in 65 patients with degenerative disc disease.•ALIF was performed with a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles.•At 2-year follow-up, functional X-rays disclosed a 95.4% fusion rate.•Excellent clinical outcome (Macnab’s criteria) was reported by 75.4...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical neurology and neurosurgery Vol. 168; pp. 24 - 29 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
01.05.2018
Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | •Stand-alone L5-S1 ALIF was evaluated in 65 patients with degenerative disc disease.•ALIF was performed with a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles.•At 2-year follow-up, functional X-rays disclosed a 95.4% fusion rate.•Excellent clinical outcome (Macnab’s criteria) was reported by 75.4% of the patients.•No patient underwent additional surgical procedures during the period of study.
Recent improvements in cage designs with integral fixation and screw attachments have made stand-alone ALIF a viable option with several possible advantages. The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without adding a bone graft for stand-alone ALIF in the treatment of L5-S1 isolated degenerative disc discopathy (DDD).
Sixty-five patients who required surgery for DDD were evaluated. Clinical outcome evaluations included back and leg pain (VAS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and patient satisfaction (Macnab’s criteria). Radiological outcomes include the assessment of disc height, the L5-S1 intervertebral disc angle, and anterior intervertebral fusion through standard and functional sagittal X-rays of the lumbar spine. Clinical and radiological measurements were assessed 2, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.
Clinical outcomes improved progressively and stabilized from 12- to 24-month follow-up. Final postoperative ODI scores showed a notable improvement (95%CI = 36.1–48.9 points; p < .001). Similarly, 24-month postoperative VAS scores revealed a significant decrease in pain (95%CI = 5.4–6.2; p < .001). The fusion rate was 95.4%. Anterior disc height was restored from 4.1 ± 3.2 mm at baseline to 9.5 ± 1.6 mm in the immediate postoperative period (p < .001). A small collapse (17.9%) of the disc height was detected from the 2- and 24-month follow-ups. Cage subsidence (more than 3 mm collapse) was detected in 4 cases (6.2%) and was related to cage size (more than 11 mm height; P < .05). There were no serious bone substitute-related adverse events and no revision surgeries.
Stand–alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without an autologous bone graft is an effective and safe treatment option for L5-S1 degenerative pathology. Clinical outcomes were very satisfactory with a high fusion rate. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Recent improvements in cage designs with integral fixation and screw attachments have made stand-alone ALIF a viable option with several possible advantages. The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without adding a bone graft for stand-alone ALIF in the treatment of L5-S1 isolated degenerative disc discopathy (DDD).
Sixty-five patients who required surgery for DDD were evaluated. Clinical outcome evaluations included back and leg pain (VAS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and patient satisfaction (Macnab's criteria). Radiological outcomes include the assessment of disc height, the L5-S1 intervertebral disc angle, and anterior intervertebral fusion through standard and functional sagittal X-rays of the lumbar spine. Clinical and radiological measurements were assessed 2, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.
Clinical outcomes improved progressively and stabilized from 12- to 24-month follow-up. Final postoperative ODI scores showed a notable improvement (95%CI = 36.1-48.9 points; p < .001). Similarly, 24-month postoperative VAS scores revealed a significant decrease in pain (95%CI = 5.4-6.2; p < .001). The fusion rate was 95.4%. Anterior disc height was restored from 4.1 ± 3.2 mm at baseline to 9.5 ± 1.6 mm in the immediate postoperative period (p < .001). A small collapse (17.9%) of the disc height was detected from the 2- and 24-month follow-ups. Cage subsidence (more than 3 mm collapse) was detected in 4 cases (6.2%) and was related to cage size (more than 11 mm height; P < .05). There were no serious bone substitute-related adverse events and no revision surgeries.
Stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without an autologous bone graft is an effective and safe treatment option for L5-S1 degenerative pathology. Clinical outcomes were very satisfactory with a high fusion rate. Recent improvements in cage designs with integral fixation and screw attachments have made stand-alone ALIF a viable option with several possible advantages. The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without adding a bone graft for stand-alone ALIF in the treatment of L5-S1 isolated degenerative disc discopathy (DDD).OBJECTIVERecent improvements in cage designs with integral fixation and screw attachments have made stand-alone ALIF a viable option with several possible advantages. The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without adding a bone graft for stand-alone ALIF in the treatment of L5-S1 isolated degenerative disc discopathy (DDD).Sixty-five patients who required surgery for DDD were evaluated. Clinical outcome evaluations included back and leg pain (VAS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and patient satisfaction (Macnab's criteria). Radiological outcomes include the assessment of disc height, the L5-S1 intervertebral disc angle, and anterior intervertebral fusion through standard and functional sagittal X-rays of the lumbar spine. Clinical and radiological measurements were assessed 2, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.PATIENTS AND METHODSSixty-five patients who required surgery for DDD were evaluated. Clinical outcome evaluations included back and leg pain (VAS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and patient satisfaction (Macnab's criteria). Radiological outcomes include the assessment of disc height, the L5-S1 intervertebral disc angle, and anterior intervertebral fusion through standard and functional sagittal X-rays of the lumbar spine. Clinical and radiological measurements were assessed 2, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.Clinical outcomes improved progressively and stabilized from 12- to 24-month follow-up. Final postoperative ODI scores showed a notable improvement (95%CI = 36.1-48.9 points; p < .001). Similarly, 24-month postoperative VAS scores revealed a significant decrease in pain (95%CI = 5.4-6.2; p < .001). The fusion rate was 95.4%. Anterior disc height was restored from 4.1 ± 3.2 mm at baseline to 9.5 ± 1.6 mm in the immediate postoperative period (p < .001). A small collapse (17.9%) of the disc height was detected from the 2- and 24-month follow-ups. Cage subsidence (more than 3 mm collapse) was detected in 4 cases (6.2%) and was related to cage size (more than 11 mm height; P < .05). There were no serious bone substitute-related adverse events and no revision surgeries.RESULTSClinical outcomes improved progressively and stabilized from 12- to 24-month follow-up. Final postoperative ODI scores showed a notable improvement (95%CI = 36.1-48.9 points; p < .001). Similarly, 24-month postoperative VAS scores revealed a significant decrease in pain (95%CI = 5.4-6.2; p < .001). The fusion rate was 95.4%. Anterior disc height was restored from 4.1 ± 3.2 mm at baseline to 9.5 ± 1.6 mm in the immediate postoperative period (p < .001). A small collapse (17.9%) of the disc height was detected from the 2- and 24-month follow-ups. Cage subsidence (more than 3 mm collapse) was detected in 4 cases (6.2%) and was related to cage size (more than 11 mm height; P < .05). There were no serious bone substitute-related adverse events and no revision surgeries.Stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without an autologous bone graft is an effective and safe treatment option for L5-S1 degenerative pathology. Clinical outcomes were very satisfactory with a high fusion rate.CONCLUSIONStand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without an autologous bone graft is an effective and safe treatment option for L5-S1 degenerative pathology. Clinical outcomes were very satisfactory with a high fusion rate. •Stand-alone L5-S1 ALIF was evaluated in 65 patients with degenerative disc disease.•ALIF was performed with a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles.•At 2-year follow-up, functional X-rays disclosed a 95.4% fusion rate.•Excellent clinical outcome (Macnab’s criteria) was reported by 75.4% of the patients.•No patient underwent additional surgical procedures during the period of study. Recent improvements in cage designs with integral fixation and screw attachments have made stand-alone ALIF a viable option with several possible advantages. The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without adding a bone graft for stand-alone ALIF in the treatment of L5-S1 isolated degenerative disc discopathy (DDD). Sixty-five patients who required surgery for DDD were evaluated. Clinical outcome evaluations included back and leg pain (VAS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and patient satisfaction (Macnab’s criteria). Radiological outcomes include the assessment of disc height, the L5-S1 intervertebral disc angle, and anterior intervertebral fusion through standard and functional sagittal X-rays of the lumbar spine. Clinical and radiological measurements were assessed 2, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Clinical outcomes improved progressively and stabilized from 12- to 24-month follow-up. Final postoperative ODI scores showed a notable improvement (95%CI = 36.1–48.9 points; p < .001). Similarly, 24-month postoperative VAS scores revealed a significant decrease in pain (95%CI = 5.4–6.2; p < .001). The fusion rate was 95.4%. Anterior disc height was restored from 4.1 ± 3.2 mm at baseline to 9.5 ± 1.6 mm in the immediate postoperative period (p < .001). A small collapse (17.9%) of the disc height was detected from the 2- and 24-month follow-ups. Cage subsidence (more than 3 mm collapse) was detected in 4 cases (6.2%) and was related to cage size (more than 11 mm height; P < .05). There were no serious bone substitute-related adverse events and no revision surgeries. Stand–alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without an autologous bone graft is an effective and safe treatment option for L5-S1 degenerative pathology. Clinical outcomes were very satisfactory with a high fusion rate. ObjectiveRecent improvements in cage designs with integral fixation and screw attachments have made stand-alone ALIF a viable option with several possible advantages. The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without adding a bone graft for stand-alone ALIF in the treatment of L5-S1 isolated degenerative disc discopathy (DDD).Patients and methodsSixty-five patients who required surgery for DDD were evaluated. Clinical outcome evaluations included back and leg pain (VAS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and patient satisfaction (Macnab’s criteria). Radiological outcomes include the assessment of disc height, the L5-S1 intervertebral disc angle, and anterior intervertebral fusion through standard and functional sagittal X-rays of the lumbar spine. Clinical and radiological measurements were assessed 2, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.ResultsClinical outcomes improved progressively and stabilized from 12- to 24-month follow-up. Final postoperative ODI scores showed a notable improvement (95%CI = 36.1–48.9 points; p < .001). Similarly, 24-month postoperative VAS scores revealed a significant decrease in pain (95%CI = 5.4–6.2; p < .001). The fusion rate was 95.4%. Anterior disc height was restored from 4.1 ± 3.2 mm at baseline to 9.5 ± 1.6 mm in the immediate postoperative period (p < .001). A small collapse (17.9%) of the disc height was detected from the 2- and 24-month follow-ups. Cage subsidence (more than 3 mm collapse) was detected in 4 cases (6.2%) and was related to cage size (more than 11 mm height; P < .05). There were no serious bone substitute-related adverse events and no revision surgeries.ConclusionStand–alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without an autologous bone graft is an effective and safe treatment option for L5-S1 degenerative pathology. Clinical outcomes were very satisfactory with a high fusion rate. |
Author | Barrios, Carlos Norotte, Gilles |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Gilles surname: Norotte fullname: Norotte, Gilles email: gilles-norotte@wanadoo.fr organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal des Alpes du Sud, 05000, Gap, France – sequence: 2 givenname: Carlos surname: Barrios fullname: Barrios, Carlos email: carlos.barrios@ucv.es organization: Institute for Research on Musculoskeletal Disorders, Valencia Catholic University, Quevedo 2, 46001, Valencia, Spain |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29505978$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNks9uEzEQxi1URNPCK1SWuHDZMN4_XkdCiCpKoSISSMB55bVnEwfHDra3kLfiEXFIyqGXcrI0-n3fzHzjC3LmvENCrhhMGTD-ejNV1jgcg5-WwMQU2BSq9gmZMNGWBZ9xcUYmUEFViJq35-Qixg0AVBUXz8h5OWugmbViQn7Ps41R0lLpNA1SG2_96m_Bj0n5LUYqh4SBxpSJQto8B71e3t7QweeicSuLdNkUXxjVuEKHQSZzh1SbqPxOpvWejgeKSvp5sfhIlVwhHYy1qOlPk9Z0vdfB_9rLzJqE1EmXZSEZZXPrA5HnoP2h6yrkSZ6Tp4O0EV-c3kvy7Wbxdf6hWH56fzu_XhaqblgqBDRDXretleqB13WtayV0CTA0SvQCelZX0ErFSym4lC2KRgMy3ktW9hpm1SV5dfTdBf9jxJi6bd4IrZUO_Ri7nDorW2h4ndGXD9CNH4PL02WqzFk3M1Fm6upEjf0WdbcLZivDvru_RQb4EVDBxxhw-Icw6A5H7zbd_dEP7UUHrMsrZuGbB0JlUk7TuxSksY_L3x3lmOO8Mxi6qAw6hdoEVKnT3jxu8faBhTp9q--4_x-DP3zT5CE |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s10143_024_02551_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcot_2021_07_016 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_022_07516_0 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_55139 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12306_019_00634_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jos_2021_07_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_inat_2021_101312 crossref_primary_10_14245_ns_2143236_618 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spinee_2020_05_555 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spinee_2021_07_016 crossref_primary_10_1097_BSD_0000000000001227 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bas_2022_100924 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40634_022_00496_6 |
Cites_doi | 10.3171/2014.9.SPINE131151 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182263d91 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d81ef2 10.1007/s00402-012-1546-z 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.013 10.1007/s00586-004-0817-y 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ef5c14 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.07.005 10.2106/00004623-197153050-00004 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.02.057 10.1177/2192568217699210 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000356 10.1007/s00776-011-0088-5 10.1111/os.12030 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.10.015 10.1007/s10143-013-0483-9 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.04.023 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067093.47584.CA 10.1097/00002517-200104000-00001 10.1007/s00586-013-2948-5 10.1111/os.12048 10.1097/01.BRS.0000134570.08901.30 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.03.008 10.1097/01.bsd.0000133509.99670.95 10.3340/jkns.2010.47.5.352 10.1007/s00586-004-0722-4 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2018 Elsevier B.V. Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Copyright Elsevier Limited May 2018 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2018 Elsevier B.V. – notice: Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. – notice: Copyright Elsevier Limited May 2018 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7TK 7X7 7XB 88E 88G 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8G5 ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ GUQSH K9. M0S M1P M2M M2O MBDVC PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PSYQQ Q9U 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Neurosciences Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Psychology Database (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Psychology Database Proquest Research Library Research Library (Corporate) ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest One Psychology Research Library Prep ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni) Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest Psychology Journals ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic ProQuest One Psychology |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1872-6968 |
EndPage | 29 |
ExternalDocumentID | 29505978 10_1016_j_clineuro_2018_01_037 S030384671830043X |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | France |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: France |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 29B 3O- 4.4 457 4CK 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 7-5 71M 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ 8G5 8P~ 9JM AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AATTM AAXKI AAXLA AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABCQJ ABFNM ABFRF ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABMZM ABUWG ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACIEU ACIUM ACPRK ACRLP ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE AEBSH AEFWE AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFJKZ AFKRA AFPUW AFRAH AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGUBO AGWIK AGYEJ AHHHB AHMBA AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRLJ AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN AZQEC BENPR BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU CS3 DU5 DWQXO EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EMOBN EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN FYUFA G-2 G-Q GBLVA GNUQQ GUQSH HDW HMCUK HMK HMO HMQ HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM LX8 M1P M29 M2M M2O M2V M41 MO0 MOBAO N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OQ- OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PG~ PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PSYQQ PUEGO Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SAE SCC SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SEW SNS SPCBC SSH SSN SSZ SV3 T5K UKHRP UNMZH WUQ Z5R ZGI ~G- 3V. AACTN AADPK AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AFKWA AJBFU AJOXV AMFUW EFLBG LCYCR RIG AAYXX AFCTW AGRNS ALIPV CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7TK 7XB 8FK K9. MBDVC PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-805f00374ccb06444d4c8d200f5c8b80b14307ac62a86aa7e85d0e16ba12bd093 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 0303-8467 1872-6968 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 09:26:44 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 05:53:32 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:35:14 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:02:30 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:08:50 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:34:06 EST 2024 Tue Aug 26 16:33:29 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Spine fusion Hydroxyapatite Subsidence ALIF PEEK cage |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c451t-805f00374ccb06444d4c8d200f5c8b80b14307ac62a86aa7e85d0e16ba12bd093 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
PMID | 29505978 |
PQID | 2022955982 |
PQPubID | 1226360 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2011270564 proquest_journals_2022955982 pubmed_primary_29505978 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clineuro_2018_01_037 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_clineuro_2018_01_037 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_clineuro_2018_01_037 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_clineuro_2018_01_037 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | May 2018 2018-05-00 20180501 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2018 text: May 2018 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Netherlands |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Netherlands – name: Assen |
PublicationTitle | Clinical neurology and neurosurgery |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Clin Neurol Neurosurg |
PublicationYear | 2018 |
Publisher | Elsevier B.V Elsevier Limited |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier B.V – name: Elsevier Limited |
References | Teng, Han, Phan, Mobbs (bib0090) 2017; 44 Mobbs, Maharaj, Rao (bib0060) 2014; 21 Strube, Hoff, Hartwig, Perka, Gross, Putzier (bib0015) 2012; 25 Carragee, Hurwitz, Weiner (bib0070) 2011; 11 Li, Dumonski, Liu, Lipman, Hong, Yang, Jin, Ren, Limthongkul, Bessey, Thalgott, Gebauer, Albert, Vaccaro (bib0135) 2010; 35 Ohtori, Koshi, Yamashita, Takaso, Yamauchi, Inoue (bib0025) 2011; 16 Mannion, Nowitzke, Wood (bib0065) 2011; 11 Udby, Bech-Azeddine (bib0140) 2015; 133 Viglione, Chamoli, Diwan (bib0100) 2017; 7 Phillips, Cunningham, Carandang, Ghanayem, Voronov, Havey, Patwardhan (bib0125) 2004; 29 Fairbank, Pynsent (bib0105) 2000; 25 Mobbs, Loganathan, Yeung, Rao (bib0020) 2013; 4 Slosar, Josey, Reynolds (bib0110) 2007; 7 Ishihara, Osada, Kanamori, Kawaguchi, Ohmori, Kimura (bib0040) 2001; 14 Schroeder, Kepler, Millhouse, Fleischman, Maltenfort, Bateman, Vaccaro (bib0085) 2016; 29 Choi, Sung (bib0120) 2006; 15 Cheung, Zhang, Lu, Luk, Leong (bib0035) 2003; 28 Chau, Xu, Wong, Mobbs (bib0055) 2014; 37 Motosuneya, Asazuma, Nobuta, Masuoka, Ichimura, Fujikawa (bib0045) 2005; 18 Mroz, Jc, Hashimoto, Norvell (bib0075) 2010; 35 Macnab (bib0080) 1971; 53 Kim, Kim, Lee, Park, Hwang, Cheh (bib0010) 2010; 73 Ajiboye, Alas, Mosich, Sharma, Pourtaheri (bib0095) 2017; 15 Behrbalk, Uri, Parks, Musson, Soh Cheong, Boszczyk (bib0115) 2013; 22 Mobbs, Chung, Rao (bib0030) 2013; 5 Saraph, Lerch, Walochnik, Bach, Krismer, Wimmer (bib0050) 2004; 13 Cho, Ryu, Park (bib0130) 2010; 47 Jiang, Chen, Jiang (bib0005) 2012; 132 Motosuneya (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0045) 2005; 18 Phillips (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0125) 2004; 29 Cheung (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0035) 2003; 28 Schroeder (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0085) 2016; 29 Slosar (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0110) 2007; 7 Behrbalk (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0115) 2013; 22 Kim (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0010) 2010; 73 Carragee (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0070) 2011; 11 Ohtori (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0025) 2011; 16 Ishihara (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0040) 2001; 14 Udby (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0140) 2015; 133 Mroz (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0075) 2010; 35 Ajiboye (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0095) 2017; 15 Strube (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0015) 2012; 25 Mobbs (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0020) 2013; 4 Viglione (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0100) 2017; 7 Mobbs (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0060) 2014; 21 Fairbank (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0105) 2000; 25 Cho (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0130) 2010; 47 Choi (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0120) 2006; 15 Chau (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0055) 2014; 37 Jiang (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0005) 2012; 132 Macnab (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0080) 1971; 53 Mobbs (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0030) 2013; 5 Mannion (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0065) 2011; 11 Li (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0135) 2010; 35 Teng (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0090) 2017; 44 Saraph (10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0050) 2004; 13 |
References_xml | – volume: 4 start-page: 153 year: 2013 end-page: 163 ident: bib0020 article-title: Indications for anterior lumbar interbody fusion publication-title: Orthop. Surg. – volume: 18 start-page: 18 year: 2005 end-page: 22 ident: bib0045 article-title: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: changes in area of the dural tube, disc height, and prevalence of cauda equina adhesion in magnetic resonance images publication-title: J. Spinal Disord. Tech. – volume: 13 start-page: 425 year: 2004 end-page: 443 ident: bib0050 article-title: Comparison of conventional versus minimally invasive extraperitoneal approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion publication-title: Eur. Spine J. – volume: 15 start-page: 16 year: 2006 end-page: 22 ident: bib0120 article-title: Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages publication-title: Eur. Spine J. – volume: 15 year: 2017 ident: bib0095 article-title: Radiographic and clinical outcomes of anterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions. A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies publication-title: Clin. Spine Surg. – volume: 11 start-page: 527 year: 2011 end-page: 533 ident: bib0065 article-title: Promoting fusion in minimally invasive lumbar interbody stabilization with low-dose bone morphogenic protein-2—but what is the cost? publication-title: Spine J. – volume: 14 start-page: 91 year: 2001 end-page: 99 ident: bib0040 article-title: Minimum 10-year follow-up study of anterior lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis publication-title: J. Spinal Disord. – volume: 11 start-page: 471 year: 2011 end-page: 491 ident: bib0070 article-title: A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: emerging safety concerns and lessons learned publication-title: Spine J. – volume: 28 start-page: 1385 year: 2003 end-page: 1389 ident: bib0035 article-title: Reduction of disc space distraction after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous iliac crest graft publication-title: Spine – volume: 29 start-page: 150 year: 2016 end-page: 155 ident: bib0085 article-title: L5/S1 fusion rates in degenerative spine surgery: a systematic review comparing ALIF, TLIF, and axial interbody arthrodesis publication-title: Clin. Spine Surg. – volume: 133 start-page: 64 year: 2015 end-page: 69 ident: bib0140 article-title: Clinical outcome of stand-alone ALIF compared to posterior instrumentation for degenerative disc disease: a pilot study and a literature review publication-title: Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. – volume: 25 start-page: 362 year: 2012 end-page: 369 ident: bib0015 article-title: Stand-alone anterior versus anteroposterior lumbar interbody single-level fusion after a mean follow-up of 41 months publication-title: J. Spinal Disord. Tech. – volume: 53 start-page: 891 year: 1971 end-page: 903 ident: bib0080 article-title: Negative disc exploration: an analysis of the cause of nerve root involvement in sixty-eight patients publication-title: J. Bone Jt. Surg. (Am.) – volume: 37 start-page: 23 year: 2014 end-page: 37 ident: bib0055 article-title: Current status of bone graft options for anterior interbody fusion of the cervical and lumbar spine publication-title: Neurosurg. Rev. – volume: 25 start-page: 2940 year: 2000 end-page: 2952 ident: bib0105 article-title: The Oswestry disability index publication-title: Spine – volume: 73 start-page: 565 year: 2010 end-page: 571 ident: bib0010 article-title: Comparison study of the instrumented circumferential fusion with instru-mented anterior lumbar interbody fusion as a surgical procedure for adultlow-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis publication-title: World Neurosurg. – volume: 5 start-page: 77 year: 2013 end-page: 85 ident: bib0030 article-title: Bone graft substitutes for anterior lumbar interbody fusion publication-title: Orthop. Surg. – volume: 47 start-page: 352 year: 2010 end-page: 357 ident: bib0130 article-title: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with stand-alone interbody cage in treatment of lumbar intervertebral foraminal stenosis: comparative study of two different types of cages publication-title: J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc. – volume: 35 start-page: S86 year: 2010 end-page: S104 ident: bib0075 article-title: Complications related to osteobiologics use in spine surgery: a systematic review publication-title: Spine – volume: 7 start-page: 301 year: 2007 end-page: 307 ident: bib0110 article-title: Accelerating lumbar fusions by combining rhBMP-2 with allograft bone: a prospective analysis of interbody fusion rates and clinical outcomes publication-title: Spine J. – volume: 44 start-page: 11 year: 2017 end-page: 17 ident: bib0090 article-title: A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF publication-title: J. Clin. Neurosci. – volume: 35 start-page: 1564 year: 2010 end-page: 1570 ident: bib0135 article-title: A multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a stand-alone anterior carbon I/F cage for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: two-year results from a food and drug administration investigational device exemption clinical trial publication-title: Spine – volume: 29 start-page: 1731 year: 2004 end-page: 1736 ident: bib0125 article-title: Effect of supplemental translaminar facet screw fixation on the stability of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion cages under physiologic compressive preloads publication-title: Spine – volume: 7 start-page: 587 year: 2017 end-page: 595 ident: bib0100 article-title: Is stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion a safe and efficacious treatment for isthmic spondylolisthesis of L5-S1? publication-title: Glob. Spine J. – volume: 132 start-page: 1259 year: 2012 end-page: 1266 ident: bib0005 article-title: Which procedure is better for lum-bar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminallumbar interbody fusion? publication-title: Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. – volume: 21 start-page: 867 year: 2014 end-page: 876 ident: bib0060 article-title: Clinical outcomes and fusion rates following anterior lumbar interbody fusion with bone graft substitute i-FACTOR, an anorganic bone matrix/P-15 composite publication-title: J. Neurosurg. Spine – volume: 16 start-page: 352 year: 2011 end-page: 358 ident: bib0025 article-title: Single-level instrumented posterolateral fusión versus non-instrumented anterior interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective study with a 2-year follow-up publication-title: J. Orthop. Sci. – volume: 22 start-page: 2869 year: 2013 end-page: 2875 ident: bib0115 article-title: Fusion and subsidence rate of stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using PEEK cage with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 publication-title: Eur. Spine J. – volume: 15 issue: June year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0095 article-title: Radiographic and clinical outcomes of anterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions. A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies publication-title: Clin. Spine Surg. – volume: 21 start-page: 867 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0060 article-title: Clinical outcomes and fusion rates following anterior lumbar interbody fusion with bone graft substitute i-FACTOR, an anorganic bone matrix/P-15 composite publication-title: J. Neurosurg. Spine doi: 10.3171/2014.9.SPINE131151 – volume: 25 start-page: 362 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0015 article-title: Stand-alone anterior versus anteroposterior lumbar interbody single-level fusion after a mean follow-up of 41 months publication-title: J. Spinal Disord. Tech. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182263d91 – volume: 35 start-page: S86 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0075 article-title: Complications related to osteobiologics use in spine surgery: a systematic review publication-title: Spine doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d81ef2 – volume: 132 start-page: 1259 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0005 article-title: Which procedure is better for lum-bar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminallumbar interbody fusion? publication-title: Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. doi: 10.1007/s00402-012-1546-z – volume: 44 start-page: 11 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0090 article-title: A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF publication-title: J. Clin. Neurosci. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.013 – volume: 15 start-page: 16 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0120 article-title: Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages publication-title: Eur. Spine J. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0817-y – volume: 35 start-page: 1564 issue: 26 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0135 article-title: A multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a stand-alone anterior carbon I/F cage for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: two-year results from a food and drug administration investigational device exemption clinical trial publication-title: Spine doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ef5c14 – volume: 25 start-page: 2940 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0105 article-title: The Oswestry disability index publication-title: Spine doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017 – volume: 11 start-page: 527 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0065 article-title: Promoting fusion in minimally invasive lumbar interbody stabilization with low-dose bone morphogenic protein-2—but what is the cost? publication-title: Spine J. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.07.005 – volume: 53 start-page: 891 year: 1971 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0080 article-title: Negative disc exploration: an analysis of the cause of nerve root involvement in sixty-eight patients publication-title: J. Bone Jt. Surg. (Am.) doi: 10.2106/00004623-197153050-00004 – volume: 73 start-page: 565 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0010 article-title: Comparison study of the instrumented circumferential fusion with instru-mented anterior lumbar interbody fusion as a surgical procedure for adultlow-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis publication-title: World Neurosurg. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.02.057 – volume: 7 start-page: 587 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0100 article-title: Is stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion a safe and efficacious treatment for isthmic spondylolisthesis of L5-S1? publication-title: Glob. Spine J. doi: 10.1177/2192568217699210 – volume: 29 start-page: 150 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0085 article-title: L5/S1 fusion rates in degenerative spine surgery: a systematic review comparing ALIF, TLIF, and axial interbody arthrodesis publication-title: Clin. Spine Surg. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000356 – volume: 16 start-page: 352 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0025 article-title: Single-level instrumented posterolateral fusión versus non-instrumented anterior interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective study with a 2-year follow-up publication-title: J. Orthop. Sci. doi: 10.1007/s00776-011-0088-5 – volume: 5 start-page: 77 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0030 article-title: Bone graft substitutes for anterior lumbar interbody fusion publication-title: Orthop. Surg. doi: 10.1111/os.12030 – volume: 7 start-page: 301 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0110 article-title: Accelerating lumbar fusions by combining rhBMP-2 with allograft bone: a prospective analysis of interbody fusion rates and clinical outcomes publication-title: Spine J. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.10.015 – volume: 37 start-page: 23 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0055 article-title: Current status of bone graft options for anterior interbody fusion of the cervical and lumbar spine publication-title: Neurosurg. Rev. doi: 10.1007/s10143-013-0483-9 – volume: 11 start-page: 471 issue: 6 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0070 article-title: A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: emerging safety concerns and lessons learned publication-title: Spine J. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.04.023 – volume: 28 start-page: 1385 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0035 article-title: Reduction of disc space distraction after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous iliac crest graft publication-title: Spine doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067093.47584.CA – volume: 14 start-page: 91 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0040 article-title: Minimum 10-year follow-up study of anterior lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis publication-title: J. Spinal Disord. doi: 10.1097/00002517-200104000-00001 – volume: 22 start-page: 2869 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0115 article-title: Fusion and subsidence rate of stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using PEEK cage with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 publication-title: Eur. Spine J. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2948-5 – volume: 4 start-page: 153 issue: 5 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0020 article-title: Indications for anterior lumbar interbody fusion publication-title: Orthop. Surg. doi: 10.1111/os.12048 – volume: 29 start-page: 1731 issue: 16 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0125 article-title: Effect of supplemental translaminar facet screw fixation on the stability of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion cages under physiologic compressive preloads publication-title: Spine doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000134570.08901.30 – volume: 133 start-page: 64 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0140 article-title: Clinical outcome of stand-alone ALIF compared to posterior instrumentation for degenerative disc disease: a pilot study and a literature review publication-title: Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.03.008 – volume: 18 start-page: 18 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0045 article-title: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: changes in area of the dural tube, disc height, and prevalence of cauda equina adhesion in magnetic resonance images publication-title: J. Spinal Disord. Tech. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000133509.99670.95 – volume: 47 start-page: 352 issue: 5 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0130 article-title: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with stand-alone interbody cage in treatment of lumbar intervertebral foraminal stenosis: comparative study of two different types of cages publication-title: J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2010.47.5.352 – volume: 13 start-page: 425 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037_bib0050 article-title: Comparison of conventional versus minimally invasive extraperitoneal approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion publication-title: Eur. Spine J. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0722-4 |
SSID | ssj0003368 |
Score | 2.271877 |
Snippet | •Stand-alone L5-S1 ALIF was evaluated in 65 patients with degenerative disc disease.•ALIF was performed with a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite... Recent improvements in cage designs with integral fixation and screw attachments have made stand-alone ALIF a viable option with several possible advantages.... ObjectiveRecent improvements in cage designs with integral fixation and screw attachments have made stand-alone ALIF a viable option with several possible... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 24 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged ALIF Autografts Bone grafts Bone Screws Bone Transplantation - adverse effects Durapatite - therapeutic use Ethics Female Follow-Up Studies Human subjects Humans Hydroxyapatite Internal Fixators Intervertebral Disc Degeneration - surgery Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery Intervertebral discs Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery Male Middle Aged Nanoparticles Neurology Pain Patient satisfaction Patients PEEK cage Skin & tissue grafts Spinal Fusion - adverse effects Spine (lumbar) Spine fusion Subsidence Surgery Treatment Outcome X-rays |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Lb9QwELagSIgLopTHQqkGqddAnMSx94QqtKs-ERJU2pvl2M5CtUrKbvbQf8VPZMZxAgdKOSeTOJrxzJfxNzOMHWZGeFd7RG4Kt1sx5SKZpt4knMvclmhj1lJq4OJTeXxZnC7EIibcNpFWOfjE4KhdaylHTj_pGXVLU9mH6x8JTY2i09U4QuM-e0Cty4jSJRfjD1ea56EUDu04TyjO_lEhfPWOKg-p_wXRu1Ro3Umz0P8enG4DnyEIzZ-wxxE9wlGv7l12zzdP2cOLeD6-x37GNp8rMI2DtXHfB98G7bbDD_UbCFPBIaQQErNqGw9H5ydzQPAKlDdYeTgXyRcOzi9DS2ryh0DFuy1NL74BYsovwcDn2ewMLLojqKme0AGldOHbjSNijCGiduehMQ2KRfJduAPXARW9dbnGlTxjl_PZ14_HSZzJkNhC8A4DmqhDzxprK0QzReEKqxxutVpYVam0QvyVSmPLzKjSGOmVcKnnZWV4Vrl0mj9nOw2-5CUDBDLcS1nLtKwLl-dV7lHJlk6RlROlmTAxKEPb2LCc5mas9MBMu9KDEjUpUadc49Im7P0od9237LhTQg661kNBKrpQjVHlTsnpKBkhSw9F_kt2fzArHR3HRv828wl7O17GLU_nOKbx7Zbu4cQXEGUxYS96cxw_FIURMEv16t8Pf80e0Up65uY-2-nWW_8G0VVXHYQt9As8nSUF priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Clinical and radiological outcomes after stand-alone ALIF for single L5-S1 degenerative discopathy using a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without bone graft |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S030384671830043X https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29505978 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2022955982 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2011270564 |
Volume | 168 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3fa9swEBalg7GXsd_L1pUb7NWNZUuW85iWhHRtQ1lXyJuRJTlLCU5JnYe-7G_an9g7Wc42aOlgLwmxdfgcne4-pO_uGPuSaOls5RC55bjcxIDLaBA7HXGuUpOhjRlDWwNn02xyKb7O5GyHHXW5MESrDL6_9eneW4cr_fBv9q8Xi_4FmmdK0RONks6zZpTBLhRZ-cHP3zSPNPXpcDQ4otF_ZAlfHVD2IdXAIIpX7st3Uj_0-wPUQwDUB6LxC_Y8IEgYtkq-ZDuufsWenoUz8tfsVyj1uQRdW1hru-j8G6w2Db6nuwHfGRz8NkKkl6vawfD0eAwIYIH2DpYOTmV0wcG6uS9LTT4RKIF3RR2Mb4HY8nPQcD4anYBBlwQV5RRaoG1d-HFriRyjiazdOKh1jWKBgOdHoB5Q0lPna9TkDbscj74fTaLQlyEyQvIGg5qsfN0aY0pENEJYYXKLy62SJi_zuEQMFittskTnmdbK5dLGjmel5klp40H6lu3W-JD3DBDMcKdUpeKsEjZNy9QlcWLoJDm3MtM9JrvJKEwoWk69M5ZFx067KrpJLGgSi5gXqFqP9bdy123ZjkclVDfXRZeUim60wMjyqORgK_mX6f6T7F5nVkVwHjd4n3qsU2XFHvu8vY3Lns5ydO1WGxrDiTMgM9Fj71pz3L4oCiNoVvmH_1DsI3tGv1pq5x7bbdYb9wnhV1Pu-_WFn2qm9tmT4fHJZIrfh6Pp-bc7bNszxw |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lj9MwELZWXQm4IN4UFhgkOAbycuIeEFqgVUsfWsGutDfj2E5hVSVLmwr1TyF-IjNJHDgAy2XPzTRuZ-bz5_E8GHsWKm5NbpG5CXS3eBBwb-Bb5QVBGukEbUxrCg3MF8n4JH5_yk_32HdXC0NplQ4Ta6A2paYYOR3SQ-qWJsLX5189mhpFt6tuhEZjFlO7-4ZHts2ryTvU7_MwHA2P3469dqqAp2MeVAjJPK-7rmid4X4cxybWwqCx5FyLTPgZMgg_VToJlUiUSq3gxrdBkqkgzEzdfAkhfz-O8CjTY_tvhoujDx32R1FdfIeeE3m0s_9Wk3z2gmodqeMGJZSJulkoTV__83b4N7pbb3ujG-x6y1fhsDGwm2zPFrfYlXl7I3-b_Wgbi65AFQbWynxxaArltsK_1m6gnkMOddDCU6uysHA4m4wA6TJQpGJlYca9jwEYu6ybYBMCA5ULlzQveQeUm78EBUfD4RQ0AiDkVMFogILI8HlnKBVHUWp4ZaFQBYq16X71E7gOyOityzWu5A47uRR93WW9Al9ynwFSp8CmaZ76SR6bKMoii2al6d5aGJ6oPuNOGVK3LdJpUsdKuly4M-mUKEmJ0g8kLq3PXnZy502TkAslUqdr6UpgEbQl7mMXSg46yZYkNeTnv2QPnFnJFqo28pdj9dnT7mMEGbo5UoUtt_RMQBkKPIn77F5jjt0PRWGk6Kl48O8vf8Kujo_nMzmbLKYP2TVaVZM3esB61XprHyG3q7LHrUMB-3TZPvwTUuJiXA |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEF5VRaq4IN4ECgwSHE29ttfrHBCqaKKGpFUlqJTbst5dB6rILokjlH_FmV_HzPoBB6Bceo4n3mQe--3sNzOMvYy0cLZwiNwydLdkyEUwDJ0OOJexSdHGjKHUwMlpenyevJ-L-Q770dXCEK2yi4k-UNvKUI6cDukRdUvLooOipUWcHY3fXn4NaIIU3bR24zQaE5m67Tc8vq3fTI5Q16-iaDz6-O44aCcMBCYRvMbwLArfgcWYHPfmJLGJySwaTiFMlmdhjmgilNqkkc5SraXLhA0dT3PNo9z6RkwY_m_IWHDyMTnvD3thHPsyPPShOKA9_rfq5IvXVPVIvTeIWpb5tqE0h_3PG-PfgK_fAMe32a0WucJhY2p32I4r77K9k_Zu_h773rYYXYIuLay0_dLFVag2Nf7Jbg1-Ijn49EWgl1Xp4HA2GQMCZ6CcxdLBTAQfOFi38O2wKRYDFQ5XNDl5C8TSX4CGs9FoCgZDIRRUy2iB0snweWuJlKOJJF47KHWJYi3xzz-B64Cc3rpY4Urus_Nr0dYDtlviSx4xQBDFnZSFDNMisXGcxw4NzNANdmZFqgdMdMpQpm2WTjM7lqpjxV2oTomKlKhCrnBpA3bQy1027UKulJCdrlVXDIvhW-GOdqXksJds4VIDg_5Ldr8zK9UGrbX65WID9qL_GMMN3SHp0lUbeoYTV0GkyYA9bMyx_6EojGBdZo___eXP2R56rppNTqdP2E1aVEMg3We79WrjniLIq_Nn3puAfbpu9_0JyfZlLA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+and+radiological+outcomes+after+stand-alone+ALIF+for+single+L5-S1+degenerative+discopathy+using+a+PEEK+cage+filled+with+hydroxyapatite+nanoparticles+without+bone+graft&rft.jtitle=Clinical+neurology+and+neurosurgery&rft.au=Norotte%2C+Gilles&rft.au=Barrios%2C+Carlos&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+B.V&rft.issn=0303-8467&rft.eissn=1872-6968&rft.volume=168&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=29&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.clineuro.2018.01.037&rft.externalDocID=S030384671830043X |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0303-8467&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0303-8467&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0303-8467&client=summon |