Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS Version 2.1 for Prostate Cancer Detection
The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data and System version 2.1 (PI-RADSv2.1), which was released in March 2019 to update version 2.0, for prostate cancer detection with transrectal ultrasound-MRI fusion biopsy and 12-core systematic biopsy. This pr...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of roentgenology (1976) Vol. 215; no. 5; pp. 1098 - 1103 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.11.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data and System version 2.1 (PI-RADSv2.1), which was released in March 2019 to update version 2.0, for prostate cancer detection with transrectal ultrasound-MRI fusion biopsy and 12-core systematic biopsy.
This prospective study included 110 consecutively registered patients who underwent multiparametric MRI evaluated with PI-RADSv2.1 criteria followed by fusion biopsy and systematic biopsy between April and September 2019. Lesion-based cancer detection rates (CDRs) were calculated for prostate cancer (Gleason grade group, > 0) and clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason grade group, > 1).
A total of 171 lesions (median size, 1.1 cm) in 110 patients were detected and evaluated with PI-RADSv2.1. In 16 patients no lesion was detected, and only systematic biopsy was performed. Lesions were categorized as follows: PI-RADS category 1, 1 lesion; PI-RADS category 2, 34 lesions; PI-RADS category 3, 54 lesions; PI-RADS category 4, 52 lesions; and PI-RADS category 5, 30 lesions. Histopathologic analysis revealed prostate cancer in 74 of 171 (43.3%) lesions and clinically significant prostate cancer in 57 of 171 (33.3%) lesions. The CDRs of prostate cancer for PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5 lesions were 20.0%, 24.1%, 51.9%, and 90.0%. The CDRs of clinically significant prostate cancer for PI-RADS 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 lesions were 0%, 5.7%, 14.8%, 44.2%, and 80.0%. In 16 patients with normal multiparametric MRI findings (PI-RADS 1), the CDRs were 50.0% for PCa and 18.8% for clinically significant prostate cancer.
This investigation yielded CDRs assessed with prospectively assigned PI-RADSv2.1 scores. CDRs increased with higher PI-RADSv2.1 scores. These results can be compared with previously published outcomes derived with PI-RADS version 2.0. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data and System version 2.1 (PI-RADSv2.1), which was released in March 2019 to update version 2.0, for prostate cancer detection with transrectal ultrasound-MRI fusion biopsy and 12-core systematic biopsy.
This prospective study included 110 consecutively registered patients who underwent multiparametric MRI evaluated with PI-RADSv2.1 criteria followed by fusion biopsy and systematic biopsy between April and September 2019. Lesion-based cancer detection rates (CDRs) were calculated for prostate cancer (Gleason grade group, > 0) and clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason grade group, > 1).
A total of 171 lesions (median size, 1.1 cm) in 110 patients were detected and evaluated with PI-RADSv2.1. In 16 patients no lesion was detected, and only systematic biopsy was performed. Lesions were categorized as follows: PI-RADS category 1, 1 lesion; PI-RADS category 2, 34 lesions; PI-RADS category 3, 54 lesions; PI-RADS category 4, 52 lesions; and PI-RADS category 5, 30 lesions. Histopathologic analysis revealed prostate cancer in 74 of 171 (43.3%) lesions and clinically significant prostate cancer in 57 of 171 (33.3%) lesions. The CDRs of prostate cancer for PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5 lesions were 20.0%, 24.1%, 51.9%, and 90.0%. The CDRs of clinically significant prostate cancer for PI-RADS 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 lesions were 0%, 5.7%, 14.8%, 44.2%, and 80.0%. In 16 patients with normal multiparametric MRI findings (PI-RADS 1), the CDRs were 50.0% for PCa and 18.8% for clinically significant prostate cancer.
This investigation yielded CDRs assessed with prospectively assigned PI-RADSv2.1 scores. CDRs increased with higher PI-RADSv2.1 scores. These results can be compared with previously published outcomes derived with PI-RADS version 2.0. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data and System version 2.1 (PI-RADSv2.1), which was released in March 2019 to update version 2.0, for prostate cancer detection with transrectal ultrasound-MRI fusion biopsy and 12-core systematic biopsy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. This prospective study included 110 consecutively registered patients who underwent multiparametric MRI evaluated with PI-RADSv2.1 criteria followed by fusion biopsy and systematic biopsy between April and September 2019. Lesion-based cancer detection rates (CDRs) were calculated for prostate cancer (Gleason grade group, > 0) and clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason grade group, > 1). RESULTS. A total of 171 lesions (median size, 1.1 cm) in 110 patients were detected and evaluated with PI-RADSv2.1. In 16 patients no lesion was detected, and only systematic biopsy was performed. Lesions were categorized as follows: PI-RADS category 1, 1 lesion; PI-RADS category 2, 34 lesions; PI-RADS category 3, 54 lesions; PI-RADS category 4, 52 lesions; and PI-RADS category 5, 30 lesions. Histopathologic analysis revealed prostate cancer in 74 of 171 (43.3%) lesions and clinically significant prostate cancer in 57 of 171 (33.3%) lesions. The CDRs of prostate cancer for PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5 lesions were 20.0%, 24.1%, 51.9%, and 90.0%. The CDRs of clinically significant prostate cancer for PI-RADS 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 lesions were 0%, 5.7%, 14.8%, 44.2%, and 80.0%. In 16 patients with normal multiparametric MRI findings (PI-RADS 1), the CDRs were 50.0% for PCa and 18.8% for clinically significant prostate cancer. CONCLUSION. This investigation yielded CDRs assessed with prospectively assigned PI-RADSv2.1 scores. CDRs increased with higher PI-RADSv2.1 scores. These results can be compared with previously published outcomes derived with PI-RADS version 2.0.OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data and System version 2.1 (PI-RADSv2.1), which was released in March 2019 to update version 2.0, for prostate cancer detection with transrectal ultrasound-MRI fusion biopsy and 12-core systematic biopsy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. This prospective study included 110 consecutively registered patients who underwent multiparametric MRI evaluated with PI-RADSv2.1 criteria followed by fusion biopsy and systematic biopsy between April and September 2019. Lesion-based cancer detection rates (CDRs) were calculated for prostate cancer (Gleason grade group, > 0) and clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason grade group, > 1). RESULTS. A total of 171 lesions (median size, 1.1 cm) in 110 patients were detected and evaluated with PI-RADSv2.1. In 16 patients no lesion was detected, and only systematic biopsy was performed. Lesions were categorized as follows: PI-RADS category 1, 1 lesion; PI-RADS category 2, 34 lesions; PI-RADS category 3, 54 lesions; PI-RADS category 4, 52 lesions; and PI-RADS category 5, 30 lesions. Histopathologic analysis revealed prostate cancer in 74 of 171 (43.3%) lesions and clinically significant prostate cancer in 57 of 171 (33.3%) lesions. The CDRs of prostate cancer for PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5 lesions were 20.0%, 24.1%, 51.9%, and 90.0%. The CDRs of clinically significant prostate cancer for PI-RADS 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 lesions were 0%, 5.7%, 14.8%, 44.2%, and 80.0%. In 16 patients with normal multiparametric MRI findings (PI-RADS 1), the CDRs were 50.0% for PCa and 18.8% for clinically significant prostate cancer. CONCLUSION. This investigation yielded CDRs assessed with prospectively assigned PI-RADSv2.1 scores. CDRs increased with higher PI-RADSv2.1 scores. These results can be compared with previously published outcomes derived with PI-RADS version 2.0. |
Author | Shih, Joanna H. Mehralivand, Sherif Pinto, Peter A. Merino, Maria J. Wood, Bradford J. Harmon, Stephanie A. Walker, Stephanie M. Sanford, Thomas Choyke, Peter L. Turkbey, Baris |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, Rm B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20892 6 Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 5 Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 4 Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 2 Clinical Research Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Bethesda, MD 7 Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 3 Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 5 Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD – name: 7 Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD – name: 3 Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD – name: 1 Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, Rm B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20892 – name: 2 Clinical Research Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Bethesda, MD – name: 6 Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD – name: 4 Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Stephanie M. surname: Walker fullname: Walker, Stephanie M. organization: Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, Rm B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20892 – sequence: 2 givenname: Sherif surname: Mehralivand fullname: Mehralivand, Sherif organization: Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, Rm B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20892 – sequence: 3 givenname: Stephanie A. surname: Harmon fullname: Harmon, Stephanie A. organization: Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, Rm B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20892., Clinical Research Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Bethesda, MD – sequence: 4 givenname: Thomas surname: Sanford fullname: Sanford, Thomas organization: Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, Rm B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20892 – sequence: 5 givenname: Maria J. surname: Merino fullname: Merino, Maria J. organization: Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD – sequence: 6 givenname: Bradford J. surname: Wood fullname: Wood, Bradford J. organization: Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD., Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD – sequence: 7 givenname: Joanna H. surname: Shih fullname: Shih, Joanna H. organization: Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD – sequence: 8 givenname: Peter A. surname: Pinto fullname: Pinto, Peter A. organization: Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD – sequence: 9 givenname: Peter L. surname: Choyke fullname: Choyke, Peter L. organization: Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, Rm B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20892 – sequence: 10 givenname: Baris surname: Turkbey fullname: Turkbey, Baris organization: Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, Rm B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20892 |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32877244$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkUlPwzAQhS1UBG3hxhnlyIEU74kvSFVb1kpUZRE3y0kcCErjYruV-Pc4FBAgTrbG35sZv9cDncY0GoADBAcYI3oyvJoPkAh3nogt0EWM8pggijqgCwlHcQrJ4y7oOfcCIUxSkeyAXYLTJMGUdsH1zBq31Lmv1jqarFW9Ur4yTWTKaHYZz4fj2-hBW9eW8ABFpbFRq_DK62ikmlzbaKx9qzfNHtguVe30_ufZB_dnk7vRRTy9Ob8cDadxThn0cZGJgnGFC54WBSM0LF6WtMxophjjrBCM45TmhGSKihImLNVZIYjmocSVSEgfnG76LlfZQhe5brxVtVzaaqHsmzSqkr9fmupZPpm1DJ-nIqWhwdFnA2teV9p5uahcrutaNdqsnMSUCJFwzHFAD3_O-h7y5WAAjjdAHmxxVpffCIKyDUiGgCQS8iOggOM_eF75D8vDplX9v-gd_8iSuQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_56415_5 crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_20_24493 crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_27546 crossref_primary_10_1097_CCO_0000000000000717 crossref_primary_10_1186_s43055_024_01244_9 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41391_021_00417_1 crossref_primary_10_1093_jncics_pkae014 crossref_primary_10_1093_postmj_qgad127 crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_221798 crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_221309 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prro_2024_06_006 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41391_022_00599_2 crossref_primary_10_1111_ijcp_14654 crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20210509 crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_23_30611 crossref_primary_10_3233_CH_209225 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_024_10734_3 crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_233337 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_024_04506_2 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_44215_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11604_024_01675_4 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.131 10.1001/jama.2014.17942 10.1056/NEJMc1807507 10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052 10.2214/AJR.13.11046 10.1111/biom.12653 10.1002/jmri.25948 10.3322/caac.21551 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1 10.1002/jmri.26555 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66086-7 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.2214/AJR.19.22679 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1546-3141 |
EndPage | 1103 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC8974984 32877244 10_2214_AJR_19_22679 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Intramural NIH HHS grantid: Z01 BC011081 – fundername: Intramural NIH HHS grantid: Z01 SC000853 – fundername: Intramural NIH HHS grantid: ZID BC011242 – fundername: CCR NIH HHS grantid: HHSN261200800001C – fundername: Intramural NIH HHS grantid: Z01 BC010655 – fundername: NCI NIH HHS grantid: HHSN261200800001E |
GroupedDBID | --- -DD .55 .GJ 1CY 1KJ 23M 2WC 34G 39C 3O- 53G 5GY 5RE AAEJM AAWTL AAYXX ABOCM ADBBV AENEX AFFNX AI. AJJEV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL C1A CITATION CS3 DIK E3Z EBS EJD F5P GX1 H13 J5H L7B LSO MJL P2P SJN TR2 TRR TWZ UDS VH1 W2D W8F WH7 WOQ X7M YJK YQI YQJ ZGI ZVN ZXP NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-db9d56a2d68dd534267ff4fb4ba5565d956284c33ba49f0758ebd93e6c336a973 |
ISSN | 0361-803X 1546-3141 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:16:51 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 06:37:47 EDT 2025 Sat May 31 02:11:11 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:05:03 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:22:37 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Keywords | multiparametric MRI prostate biopsy prostate cancer early detection PI-RADS |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c450t-db9d56a2d68dd534267ff4fb4ba5565d956284c33ba49f0758ebd93e6c336a973 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8974984 |
PMID | 32877244 |
PQID | 2439976262 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8974984 proquest_miscellaneous_2439976262 pubmed_primary_32877244 crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_19_22679 crossref_citationtrail_10_2214_AJR_19_22679 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-11-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2020 text: 2020-11-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | American journal of roentgenology (1976) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | AJR Am J Roentgenol |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
References | R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10 R12 R11 R14 R1 33464932 - J Urol. 2021 Apr;205(4):1205-1206. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001619. |
References_xml | – ident: R12 doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.131 – ident: R11 doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17942 – ident: R10 doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1807507 – ident: R5 doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y – ident: R6 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052 – ident: R3 doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11046 – ident: R9 doi: 10.1111/biom.12653 – ident: R14 doi: 10.1002/jmri.25948 – ident: R1 doi: 10.3322/caac.21551 – ident: R4 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1 – ident: R7 doi: 10.1002/jmri.26555 – ident: R8 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046 – ident: R2 doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66086-7 – reference: 33464932 - J Urol. 2021 Apr;205(4):1205-1206. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001619. |
SSID | ssj0007897 |
Score | 2.4728117 |
Snippet | The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data and System version 2.1 (PI-RADSv2.1), which was released in March... OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data and System version 2.1 (PI-RADSv2.1), which was released... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 1098 |
Title | Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS Version 2.1 for Prostate Cancer Detection |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32877244 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2439976262 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8974984 |
Volume | 215 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELagSFUviDfLS0aCU5Rl4ziJfaxKoRQtQn2IvUV2YquV2qQKKQd-PeNXkl2oBFyiPB3J36fJzGTmM0JvZJUwXvAqFgw2lNca9giLxUKrii0EzawS0_JLfnBKD1fZaszp2u6SXs6rn3_sK_kfVOEc4Gq6ZP8B2WFQOAH7gC9sAWHY_hXGX7s2dEpG-4Nsty1r-xQf7b4_jnw6LCLzxBYUmieMexntGbQ7MDe9rcVqpk7q8BdnIivRtfB1MoKuVrLJqDuBhzFJI3wTF74-w9aNmcb1MdG6VGcmn_LDF1EaOchzPdq-7tL9-h-fHGh1LJpQfT8pZfJZCghJkyFLobxlpTkYfKdyFUwvca2cnmPZxJAmC7c49aaFJyShRmni8GiecDjK3VI0E7CvLi3aKYSCBXHakhuK2uHSbXSHwI5Z9-LjaiwMKoC8rkXCvOzd9FU7aDs8vO7H_BacbNbYTpyWk3voro828K6jzn10SzUP0PbS11M8RJ8nDMIjg3CrsWcQ9gzCwCAMUODAIOwYhAcGPUKnH_ZP9g5iv7xGXNFs0ce15HWWC1LnrK6zFFy1QmuqJZUiAze_hsgZfJcqTaWgXINryZSseapyOJULXqSP0VbTNuopwgKCfvCsdcEy-CgQs2qhFoKzXChZpFU6Q1GYrLLy2vNmCZSLEmJQM8slzHKZ8NLO8gy9He6-cporN9z3Osx7CUbR_OkSjWqvv5fERNnwmc_JDD1xOAwjBQBnqFhDaLjBCK6vX2nOz6zwOhCDckaf3Tjmc7Qzkv8F2uq7a_USnNZevrIc-wXu9JVV |
linkProvider | Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective+Evaluation+of+PI-RADS+Version+2.1+for+Prostate+Cancer+Detection&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+roentgenology+%281976%29&rft.au=Walker%2C+Stephanie+M&rft.au=Mehralivand%2C+Sherif&rft.au=Harmon%2C+Stephanie+A&rft.au=Sanford%2C+Thomas&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft.volume=215&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1098&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214%2FAJR.19.22679&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F32877244&rft.externalDocID=32877244 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon |