Towards drone-based magnetometer measurements for archaeological prospection in challenging terrain
While airborne magnetometry has been used for geological surveys for decades, magnetic surveys for archaeological prospection are almost exclusively ground-based, as the detection of archaeological features requires higher spatial resolution and close proximity between sensor and object. However, th...
Saved in:
Published in | Drone systems and applications Vol. 12; pp. 1 - 15 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
NRC Research Press
01.01.2024
Canadian Science Publishing |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2564-4939 2564-4939 |
DOI | 10.1139/dsa-2023-0128 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | While airborne magnetometry has been used for geological surveys for decades, magnetic surveys for archaeological prospection are almost exclusively ground-based, as the detection of archaeological features requires higher spatial resolution and close proximity between sensor and object. However, the recent development of drones and magnetic sensors allows for low-altitude drone-based surveys, which are an interesting alternative for magnetic prospection of challenging areas, where vegetation, difficult terrain, access restrictions, or safety concerns hamper ground-based surveys. In this paper, we present test measurements in challenging areas in Germany and Switzerland, which demonstrate the potential as well as technical and practical concerns of drone-based magnetometry for archaeological prospection. We used a miniature total-field magnetometer, which was tethered to an octocopter drone. Although it is preferable to fly the sensor close to the ground where anomalies show the highest values, we could also detect magnetic anomalies in altitudes up to few metres above ground. Flights at different altitudes show the decay and widening of the anomalies with height. Drone-based magnetic measurements in rough and vegetated terrain require careful flight planning based on a high-resolution surface model. Further development is needed to improve positioning accuracy of the tethered magnetometer and to improve heading error correction. |
---|---|
AbstractList | While airborne magnetometry has been used for geological surveys for decades, magnetic surveys for archaeological prospection are almost exclusively ground-based, as the detection of archaeological features requires higher spatial resolution and close proximity between sensor and object. However, the recent development of drones and magnetic sensors allows for low-altitude drone-based surveys, which are an interesting alternative for magnetic prospection of challenging areas, where vegetation, difficult terrain, access restrictions, or safety concerns hamper ground-based surveys. In this paper, we present test measurements in challenging areas in Germany and Switzerland, which demonstrate the potential as well as technical and practical concerns of drone-based magnetometry for archaeological prospection. We used a miniature total-field magnetometer, which was tethered to an octocopter drone. Although it is preferable to fly the sensor close to the ground where anomalies show the highest values, we could also detect magnetic anomalies in altitudes up to few metres above ground. Flights at different altitudes show the decay and widening of the anomalies with height. Drone-based magnetic measurements in rough and vegetated terrain require careful flight planning based on a high-resolution surface model. Further development is needed to improve positioning accuracy of the tethered magnetometer and to improve heading error correction. Key words: drone, UAV, magnetometer, magnetometry, archaeology, magnetic prospection While airborne magnetometry has been used for geological surveys for decades, magnetic surveys for archaeological prospection are almost exclusively ground-based, as the detection of archaeological features requires higher spatial resolution and close proximity between sensor and object. However, the recent development of drones and magnetic sensors allows for low-altitude drone-based surveys, which are an interesting alternative for magnetic prospection of challenging areas, where vegetation, difficult terrain, access restrictions, or safety concerns hamper ground-based surveys. In this paper, we present test measurements in challenging areas in Germany and Switzerland, which demonstrate the potential as well as technical and practical concerns of drone-based magnetometry for archaeological prospection. We used a miniature total-field magnetometer, which was tethered to an octocopter drone. Although it is preferable to fly the sensor close to the ground where anomalies show the highest values, we could also detect magnetic anomalies in altitudes up to few metres above ground. Flights at different altitudes show the decay and widening of the anomalies with height. Drone-based magnetic measurements in rough and vegetated terrain require careful flight planning based on a high-resolution surface model. Further development is needed to improve positioning accuracy of the tethered magnetometer and to improve heading error correction. |
Audience | Trade |
Author | Coolen, Joris Klingen, Stefan Fritsch, Thomas Schmidt, Volkmar |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Volkmar orcidid: 0000-0001-8350-050X surname: Schmidt fullname: Schmidt, Volkmar – sequence: 2 givenname: Joris orcidid: 0000-0002-5767-4407 surname: Coolen fullname: Coolen, Joris – sequence: 3 givenname: Thomas surname: Fritsch fullname: Fritsch, Thomas – sequence: 4 givenname: Stefan surname: Klingen fullname: Klingen, Stefan |
BookMark | eNptkc1LHTEUxUNRqFWX3Qe6Hs3XZCZLkbYKghtdhzvJzTQykzySKeJ_37y-FlQki4Sb8zs3uecLOUo5ISFfObvgXJpLX6ETTMiOcTF-Iiei16pTRpqjV-fP5LzWJ8aYGAcp-v6EuIf8DMVX6kvz6yao6OkKc8Itr7hhoStC_V1wxbRVGnKhUNwvwLzkOTpY6K7kukO3xZxoTLTdLQumOaaZNrxATGfkOMBS8fzffkoef3x_uL7p7u5_3l5f3XVO9WzrXAhmCmZgDrgQZhwHzSB4E9SkkE-91xzEpHsvRmkY99OghWLGB8HRa9TylNwefH2GJ7srcYXyYjNE-7eQy2yhbNEtaI2UzGvpBQalANw4KiOQo9KutZOmeX07eM3Q5DGFvBVwa6zOXo3tAaJng2iqiw9UbXlco2sDDbHV3wDyALg2tVowWBc32M-ugXGxnNl9mralafdp2n2ajereUf8_97H-D1X0pBM |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_s24134270 |
Cites_doi | 10.1190/geo2020-0895.1 10.1109/TGRS.2004.826803 10.1111/1365-2478.12024 10.4324/9780203164983 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2022.104779 10.1190/1.1443903 10.11588/aiw.2011.0.26644 10.1002/arp.1877 10.1016/j.jas.2023.105818 10.3997/1365-2397.23.2.26429 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1964.tb00590.x 10.1139/juvs-2017-0015 10.11588/aiw.2021.91427 10.1190/tle35090795.1 10.1553/archaeologia104s123 10.1002/rob.22159 10.1111/1365-2478.13458 10.5169/seals-869728 10.3997/1365-2397.29.4.49509 10.46586/metalla.v27.2023.i1.3-26 10.3390/rs12162551 10.1016/C2017-0-01436-2 10.1088/0034-4885/69/7/R04 10.4000/archeosciences.9645 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.104245 10.1002/1099-0763(199512) 2:4<217::AID-ARP6140020405>3.0.CO;2-U 10.3997/1365-2397.fb2020061 10.4000/archeosciences.9325 10.1190/1.2133784 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2023.105186 10.1007/978-1-4020-4409-0_169 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2024 NRC Research Press |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 NRC Research Press |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION DOA |
DOI | 10.1139/dsa-2023-0128 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering |
EISSN | 2564-4939 |
EndPage | 15 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_9330d63d2ef44aac88492e1e46cf4b39 A828325072 10_1139_dsa_2023_0128 |
GeographicLocations | Germany |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Germany |
GroupedDBID | 5RP AAFWJ AAYXX AFPKN ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CITATION EBS GROUPED_DOAJ IAO ICD IEA ITC M~E PV9 RRP |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-cff9bf970ca122988760afd9f4b4e1b5d61a2b65d283901db762409df21ed6e63 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 2564-4939 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:23:56 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:57:19 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:01:04 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 07:43:48 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:51:46 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c450t-cff9bf970ca122988760afd9f4b4e1b5d61a2b65d283901db762409df21ed6e63 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-5767-4407 0000-0001-8350-050X |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/9330d63d2ef44aac88492e1e46cf4b39 |
PageCount | 15 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9330d63d2ef44aac88492e1e46cf4b39 gale_infotracmisc_A828325072 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A828325072 crossref_citationtrail_10_1139_dsa_2023_0128 crossref_primary_10_1139_dsa_2023_0128 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-01-01 20240101 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2024 text: 2024-01-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Drone systems and applications |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | NRC Research Press Canadian Science Publishing |
Publisher_xml | – name: NRC Research Press – name: Canadian Science Publishing |
References | Burger D (refg9/ref9) 2016 refg40/ref40 refg22/ref22 refg38/ref38 Burger D. (refg8/ref8) 2012; 42 Cichy E. (refg10/ref10) 2008 Walach G. (refg43/ref43) 2001 refg11/ref11 refg25/ref25 refg6/ref6 refg29/ref29 Aspinall A. (refg2/ref2) 2009 refg26/ref26 refg14/ref14 refg5/ref5 The MathWorks Inc. (refg42/ref42) 2023 refg23/ref23 refg37/ref37 refg17/ref17 Häge M. (refg19/ref19) 2010 refg30/ref30 refg21/ref21 Rudnick B. (refg31/ref31) 2014 refg7/ref7 refg4/ref4 Kühlborn J. (refg20/ref20) 2003 refg12/ref12 refg1/ref1 refg28/ref28 refg32/ref32 Tezkan B. (refg41/ref41) 2011; 29 Scollar I. (refg34/ref34) 1990 refg35/ref35 refg39/ref39 Fritsch T. (refg15/ref15) 2010 refg3/ref3 refg44/ref44 refg24/ref24 refg16/ref16 refg33/ref33 refg13/ref13 refg27/ref27 |
References_xml | – ident: refg44/ref44 doi: 10.1190/geo2020-0895.1 – ident: refg7/ref7 doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2004.826803 – volume-title: Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde 25. year: 2003 ident: refg20/ref20 – ident: refg23/ref23 doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.12024 – ident: refg11/ref11 doi: 10.4324/9780203164983 – ident: refg28/ref28 doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2022.104779 – ident: refg38/ref38 doi: 10.1190/1.1443903 – ident: refg5/ref5 doi: 10.11588/aiw.2011.0.26644 – ident: refg40/ref40 doi: 10.1002/arp.1877 – ident: refg39/ref39 doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2023.105818 – ident: refg24/ref24 doi: 10.3997/1365-2397.23.2.26429 – ident: refg29/ref29 doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1964.tb00590.x – ident: refg27/ref27 doi: 10.1139/juvs-2017-0015 – ident: refg12/ref12 doi: 10.11588/aiw.2021.91427 – ident: refg16/ref16 doi: 10.1190/tle35090795.1 – ident: refg30/ref30 doi: 10.1553/archaeologia104s123 – ident: refg35/ref35 doi: 10.1002/rob.22159 – volume-title: Das Tauerngold im europäischen Vergleich. Archäologische und historische Beiträge des Internationalen Kongresses in Rauris vom 7. bis 9. Oktober 2000 year: 2001 ident: refg43/ref43 – ident: refg3/ref3 doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.13458 – volume-title: Mensch und Umwelt II—Vom Oppidum “Hunnenring” bei Otzenhausen zum römischen Tempelbezirk und vicus “Auf dem Spätzrech” bei Schwarzenbach, Gem. Nonnweiler, Lkr. St. Wendel year: 2016 ident: refg9/ref9 – ident: refg26/ref26 doi: 10.5169/seals-869728 – volume: 29 start-page: 103 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: refg41/ref41 publication-title: First Break doi: 10.3997/1365-2397.29.4.49509 – ident: refg37/ref37 doi: 10.46586/metalla.v27.2023.i1.3-26 – volume-title: Signal Processing Toolbox (R2023b) year: 2023 ident: refg42/ref42 – ident: refg22/ref22 doi: 10.3390/rs12162551 – volume-title: Kneblinghausen, Stadt Rüthen, Kreis Soest (Vol. 1) year: 2014 ident: refg31/ref31 – ident: refg13/ref13 doi: 10.1016/C2017-0-01436-2 – ident: refg21/ref21 doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/69/7/R04 – volume-title: Jahrbuch Westfalen, 2009. year: 2008 ident: refg10/ref10 – ident: refg33/ref33 doi: 10.4000/archeosciences.9645 – ident: refg6/ref6 doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.104245 – volume-title: Archaeological Prospecting and Remote Sensing (Vol. 2) year: 1990 ident: refg34/ref34 – ident: refg4/ref4 doi: 10.1002/1099-0763(199512) 2:4<217::AID-ARP6140020405>3.0.CO;2-U – volume-title: Kelten und Römer im St. Wendeler Land year: 2010 ident: refg19/ref19 – volume-title: Magnetometry for archaeologists year: 2009 ident: refg2/ref2 – ident: refg32/ref32 doi: 10.3997/1365-2397.fb2020061 – volume: 42 start-page: 225 issue: 2 year: 2012 ident: refg8/ref8 publication-title: Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt – volume-title: Kelten und Römer im St. Wendeler Land. year: 2010 ident: refg15/ref15 – ident: refg17/ref17 doi: 10.4000/archeosciences.9325 – ident: refg25/ref25 doi: 10.1190/1.2133784 – ident: refg1/ref1 doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2023.105186 – ident: refg14/ref14 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-4409-0_169 |
SSID | ssj0002873255 |
Score | 2.2834773 |
Snippet | While airborne magnetometry has been used for geological surveys for decades, magnetic surveys for archaeological prospection are almost exclusively... |
SourceID | doaj gale crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database |
StartPage | 1 |
SubjectTerms | archaeology drone Drone aircraft Geological surveys Magnetic anomalies magnetic prospection Magnetometer magnetometry Technology application UAV |
Title | Towards drone-based magnetometer measurements for archaeological prospection in challenging terrain |
URI | https://doaj.org/article/9330d63d2ef44aac88492e1e46cf4b39 |
Volume | 12 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07T8MwELYQEwyIpygU5AHBgkUcO249FkRVIcEEEpvlJwLRFLVh5bdzl6QQBsTCkiG5ROfz5V7yfUfICRcycisES15iglJY5njgDEtuLoYsWYn9zrd3avIgbx6Lx86oLzwT1sADN4K7wIQ7KBHymKS01g-HUueRR6l8kk7UrXvg8zrJ1EtdMhoICJaXoJpCX4SFZTgqnKFF_uGEaqz-1iJ3fMt4k2y0QSEdNcxskZVYbpP1DlTgDvH39fnWBQ3zWRkZOp9Ap_apjNVsikda6PS72regEIrSGgYpLo0bBVPZtFXOSvpcUt9OUYGvU3gdJ0Xskofx9f3VhLUDEpiXRVYxn5J2SQ8yb3mea7AXKrMpaBAM7IArguI2d6oIEEOA3w8OLB_kcyHlPAYVldgjqyUwvU-o9CpFkWWxUFpGoR23UQSrk4PNFCH1yPlSYsa36OE4xOLV1FmE0AYEbFDABgXcI6df5G8NbMZvhJco_i8iRLuub4AOmFYHzF860CNnuHkG_0lgytu2tQCWhuhWZjTEgUwQ-eY90v9BCf-S7zw--A9uDskaLE82dZo-Wa3m7_EIIpfKHddKCtfbj-tP5Zfu4g |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards+drone-based+magnetometer+measurements+for+archaeological+prospection+in+challenging+terrain&rft.jtitle=Drone+systems+and+applications&rft.au=Schmidt%2C+Volkmar&rft.au=Coolen%2C+Joris&rft.au=Fritsch%2C+Thomas&rft.au=Klingen%2C+Stefan&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.pub=NRC+Research+Press&rft.issn=2564-4939&rft.eissn=2564-4939&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139%2Fdsa-2023-0128&rft.externalDocID=A828325072 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2564-4939&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2564-4939&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2564-4939&client=summon |