Crowdsourcing human mutations

The first Human Variome microattribution review shows that data citation and publication credit can work as incentives for systematic curation of gene variant and phenotype data. Analysis of the formal assertions in both databases and journal articles argues for better separation of data structures...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature genetics Vol. 43; no. 4; p. 279
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Nature Publishing Group US 01.04.2011
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
706/648/479/702/129/2043
Agriculture
Animal Genetics and Genomics
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Cancer Research
Databases, Genetic
editorial
Gene Function
Gene mutations
Genetic Variation
Genome, Human
Genomes
Human Genetics
Human Genome Project
Humans
Management
Medical publishing
Mutation
Publishing
Services
United States
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The first Human Variome microattribution review shows that data citation and publication credit can work as incentives for systematic curation of gene variant and phenotype data. Analysis of the formal assertions in both databases and journal articles argues for better separation of data structures from narrative so that they can better support one another to communicate meaning.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-General Information-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Commentary-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Editorial-2
ObjectType-Commentary-1
ISSN:1061-4036
1546-1718
1546-1718
DOI:10.1038/ng0411-279