ADAR2 Is Involved in Self and Nonself Recognition of Borna Disease Virus Genomic RNA in the Nucleus
Cells use the editing activity of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA proteins (ADARs) to prevent autoimmune responses induced by self dsRNA, but viruses can exploit this process to their advantage. Borna disease virus (BoDV), a nuclear-replicating RNA virus, must escape nonself RNA sensing by the hos...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of virology Vol. 94; no. 6 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Society for Microbiology
28.02.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Cells use the editing activity of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA proteins (ADARs) to prevent autoimmune responses induced by self dsRNA, but viruses can exploit this process to their advantage. Borna disease virus (BoDV), a nuclear-replicating RNA virus, must escape nonself RNA sensing by the host to establish persistent infection in the nucleus. We evaluated whether BoDV utilizes ADARs to prevent innate immune induction. ADAR2 plays a key role throughout the BoDV life cycle. ADAR2 knockdown reduced A-to-I editing of BoDV genomic RNA, leading to the induction of a strong innate immune response. These data suggest that BoDV exploits ADAR2 to edit nonself genomic RNA to appear as self RNA for innate immune evasion and establishment of persistent infection.
Cells sense pathogen-derived double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) as nonself. To avoid autoimmune activation by self dsRNA, cells utilize A-to-I editing by adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) to disrupt dsRNA structures. Considering that viruses have evolved to exploit host machinery, A-to-I editing could benefit innate immune evasion by viruses. Borna disease virus (BoDV), a nuclear-replicating RNA virus, may require escape from nonself RNA-sensing and immune responses to establish persistent infection in the nucleus; however, the strategy by which BoDV evades nonself recognition is unclear. Here, we evaluated the involvement of ADARs in BoDV infection. The infection efficiency of BoDV was markedly decreased in both ADAR1 and ADAR2 knockdown cells at the early phase of infection. Microarray analysis using ADAR2 knockdown cells revealed that ADAR2 reduces immune responses even in the absence of infection. Knockdown of ADAR2 but not ADAR1 significantly reduced the spread and titer of BoDV in infected cells. Furthermore, ADAR2 knockout decreased the infection efficiency of BoDV, and overexpression of ADAR2 rescued the reduced infectivity in ADAR2 knockdown cells. However, the growth of influenza A virus, which causes acute infection in the nucleus, was not affected by ADAR2 knockdown. Moreover, ADAR2 bound to BoDV genomic RNA and induced A-to-G mutations in the genomes of persistently infected cells. We finally demonstrated that BoDV produced in ADAR2 knockdown cells induces stronger innate immune responses than those produced in wild-type cells. Taken together, our results suggest that BoDV utilizes ADAR2 to edit its genome to appear as “self” RNA in order to maintain persistent infection in the nucleus.
IMPORTANCE
Cells use the editing activity of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA proteins (ADARs) to prevent autoimmune responses induced by self dsRNA, but viruses can exploit this process to their advantage. Borna disease virus (BoDV), a nuclear-replicating RNA virus, must escape nonself RNA sensing by the host to establish persistent infection in the nucleus. We evaluated whether BoDV utilizes ADARs to prevent innate immune induction. ADAR2 plays a key role throughout the BoDV life cycle. ADAR2 knockdown reduced A-to-I editing of BoDV genomic RNA, leading to the induction of a strong innate immune response. These data suggest that BoDV exploits ADAR2 to edit nonself genomic RNA to appear as self RNA for innate immune evasion and establishment of persistent infection. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Cells use the editing activity of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA proteins (ADARs) to prevent autoimmune responses induced by self dsRNA, but viruses can exploit this process to their advantage. Borna disease virus (BoDV), a nuclear-replicating RNA virus, must escape nonself RNA sensing by the host to establish persistent infection in the nucleus. We evaluated whether BoDV utilizes ADARs to prevent innate immune induction. ADAR2 plays a key role throughout the BoDV life cycle. ADAR2 knockdown reduced A-to-I editing of BoDV genomic RNA, leading to the induction of a strong innate immune response. These data suggest that BoDV exploits ADAR2 to edit nonself genomic RNA to appear as self RNA for innate immune evasion and establishment of persistent infection.
Cells sense pathogen-derived double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) as nonself. To avoid autoimmune activation by self dsRNA, cells utilize A-to-I editing by adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) to disrupt dsRNA structures. Considering that viruses have evolved to exploit host machinery, A-to-I editing could benefit innate immune evasion by viruses. Borna disease virus (BoDV), a nuclear-replicating RNA virus, may require escape from nonself RNA-sensing and immune responses to establish persistent infection in the nucleus; however, the strategy by which BoDV evades nonself recognition is unclear. Here, we evaluated the involvement of ADARs in BoDV infection. The infection efficiency of BoDV was markedly decreased in both ADAR1 and ADAR2 knockdown cells at the early phase of infection. Microarray analysis using ADAR2 knockdown cells revealed that ADAR2 reduces immune responses even in the absence of infection. Knockdown of ADAR2 but not ADAR1 significantly reduced the spread and titer of BoDV in infected cells. Furthermore, ADAR2 knockout decreased the infection efficiency of BoDV, and overexpression of ADAR2 rescued the reduced infectivity in ADAR2 knockdown cells. However, the growth of influenza A virus, which causes acute infection in the nucleus, was not affected by ADAR2 knockdown. Moreover, ADAR2 bound to BoDV genomic RNA and induced A-to-G mutations in the genomes of persistently infected cells. We finally demonstrated that BoDV produced in ADAR2 knockdown cells induces stronger innate immune responses than those produced in wild-type cells. Taken together, our results suggest that BoDV utilizes ADAR2 to edit its genome to appear as “self” RNA in order to maintain persistent infection in the nucleus.
IMPORTANCE
Cells use the editing activity of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA proteins (ADARs) to prevent autoimmune responses induced by self dsRNA, but viruses can exploit this process to their advantage. Borna disease virus (BoDV), a nuclear-replicating RNA virus, must escape nonself RNA sensing by the host to establish persistent infection in the nucleus. We evaluated whether BoDV utilizes ADARs to prevent innate immune induction. ADAR2 plays a key role throughout the BoDV life cycle. ADAR2 knockdown reduced A-to-I editing of BoDV genomic RNA, leading to the induction of a strong innate immune response. These data suggest that BoDV exploits ADAR2 to edit nonself genomic RNA to appear as self RNA for innate immune evasion and establishment of persistent infection. Cells sense pathogen-derived double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) as nonself. To avoid autoimmune activation by self dsRNA, cells utilize A-to-I editing by adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) to disrupt dsRNA structures. Considering that viruses have evolved to exploit host machinery, A-to-I editing could benefit innate immune evasion by viruses. Borna disease virus (BoDV), a nuclear-replicating RNA virus, may require escape from nonself RNA-sensing and immune responses to establish persistent infection in the nucleus; however, the strategy by which BoDV evades nonself recognition is unclear. Here, we evaluated the involvement of ADARs in BoDV infection. The infection efficiency of BoDV was markedly decreased in both ADAR1 and ADAR2 knockdown cells at the early phase of infection. Microarray analysis using ADAR2 knockdown cells revealed that ADAR2 reduces immune responses even in the absence of infection. Knockdown of ADAR2 but not ADAR1 significantly reduced the spread and titer of BoDV in infected cells. Furthermore, ADAR2 knockout decreased the infection efficiency of BoDV, and overexpression of ADAR2 rescued the reduced infectivity in ADAR2 knockdown cells. However, the growth of influenza A virus, which causes acute infection in the nucleus, was not affected by ADAR2 knockdown. Moreover, ADAR2 bound to BoDV genomic RNA and induced A-to-G mutations in the genomes of persistently infected cells. We finally demonstrated that BoDV produced in ADAR2 knockdown cells induces stronger innate immune responses than those produced in wild-type cells. Taken together, our results suggest that BoDV utilizes ADAR2 to edit its genome to appear as "self" RNA in order to maintain persistent infection in the nucleus. Cells use the editing activity of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA proteins (ADARs) to prevent autoimmune responses induced by self dsRNA, but viruses can exploit this process to their advantage. Borna disease virus (BoDV), a nuclear-replicating RNA virus, must escape nonself RNA sensing by the host to establish persistent infection in the nucleus. We evaluated whether BoDV utilizes ADARs to prevent innate immune induction. ADAR2 plays a key role throughout the BoDV life cycle. ADAR2 knockdown reduced A-to-I editing of BoDV genomic RNA, leading to the induction of a strong innate immune response. These data suggest that BoDV exploits ADAR2 to edit nonself genomic RNA to appear as self RNA for innate immune evasion and establishment of persistent infection. Cells sense pathogen-derived double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) as nonself. To avoid autoimmune activation by self dsRNA, cells utilize A-to-I editing by adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) to disrupt dsRNA structures. Considering that viruses have evolved to exploit host machinery, A-to-I editing could benefit innate immune evasion by viruses. Borna disease virus (BoDV), a nuclear-replicating RNA virus, may require escape from nonself RNA-sensing and immune responses to establish persistent infection in the nucleus; however, the strategy by which BoDV evades nonself recognition is unclear. Here, we evaluated the involvement of ADARs in BoDV infection. The infection efficiency of BoDV was markedly decreased in both ADAR1 and ADAR2 knockdown cells at the early phase of infection. Microarray analysis using ADAR2 knockdown cells revealed that ADAR2 reduces immune responses even in the absence of infection. Knockdown of ADAR2 but not ADAR1 significantly reduced the spread and titer of BoDV in infected cells. Furthermore, ADAR2 knockout decreased the infection efficiency of BoDV, and overexpression of ADAR2 rescued the reduced infectivity in ADAR2 knockdown cells. However, the growth of influenza A virus, which causes acute infection in the nucleus, was not affected by ADAR2 knockdown. Moreover, ADAR2 bound to BoDV genomic RNA and induced A-to-G mutations in the genomes of persistently infected cells. We finally demonstrated that BoDV produced in ADAR2 knockdown cells induces stronger innate immune responses than those produced in wild-type cells. Taken together, our results suggest that BoDV utilizes ADAR2 to edit its genome to appear as "self" RNA in order to maintain persistent infection in the nucleus.IMPORTANCE Cells use the editing activity of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA proteins (ADARs) to prevent autoimmune responses induced by self dsRNA, but viruses can exploit this process to their advantage. Borna disease virus (BoDV), a nuclear-replicating RNA virus, must escape nonself RNA sensing by the host to establish persistent infection in the nucleus. We evaluated whether BoDV utilizes ADARs to prevent innate immune induction. ADAR2 plays a key role throughout the BoDV life cycle. ADAR2 knockdown reduced A-to-I editing of BoDV genomic RNA, leading to the induction of a strong innate immune response. These data suggest that BoDV exploits ADAR2 to edit nonself genomic RNA to appear as self RNA for innate immune evasion and establishment of persistent infection.Cells sense pathogen-derived double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) as nonself. To avoid autoimmune activation by self dsRNA, cells utilize A-to-I editing by adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) to disrupt dsRNA structures. Considering that viruses have evolved to exploit host machinery, A-to-I editing could benefit innate immune evasion by viruses. Borna disease virus (BoDV), a nuclear-replicating RNA virus, may require escape from nonself RNA-sensing and immune responses to establish persistent infection in the nucleus; however, the strategy by which BoDV evades nonself recognition is unclear. Here, we evaluated the involvement of ADARs in BoDV infection. The infection efficiency of BoDV was markedly decreased in both ADAR1 and ADAR2 knockdown cells at the early phase of infection. Microarray analysis using ADAR2 knockdown cells revealed that ADAR2 reduces immune responses even in the absence of infection. Knockdown of ADAR2 but not ADAR1 significantly reduced the spread and titer of BoDV in infected cells. Furthermore, ADAR2 knockout decreased the infection efficiency of BoDV, and overexpression of ADAR2 rescued the reduced infectivity in ADAR2 knockdown cells. However, the growth of influenza A virus, which causes acute infection in the nucleus, was not affected by ADAR2 knockdown. Moreover, ADAR2 bound to BoDV genomic RNA and induced A-to-G mutations in the genomes of persistently infected cells. We finally demonstrated that BoDV produced in ADAR2 knockdown cells induces stronger innate immune responses than those produced in wild-type cells. Taken together, our results suggest that BoDV utilizes ADAR2 to edit its genome to appear as "self" RNA in order to maintain persistent infection in the nucleus.IMPORTANCE Cells use the editing activity of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA proteins (ADARs) to prevent autoimmune responses induced by self dsRNA, but viruses can exploit this process to their advantage. Borna disease virus (BoDV), a nuclear-replicating RNA virus, must escape nonself RNA sensing by the host to establish persistent infection in the nucleus. We evaluated whether BoDV utilizes ADARs to prevent innate immune induction. ADAR2 plays a key role throughout the BoDV life cycle. ADAR2 knockdown reduced A-to-I editing of BoDV genomic RNA, leading to the induction of a strong innate immune response. These data suggest that BoDV exploits ADAR2 to edit nonself genomic RNA to appear as self RNA for innate immune evasion and establishment of persistent infection. |
Author | Yanai, Mako Makino, Akiko Sakai, Madoka Tomonaga, Keizo Komorizono, Ryo Kojima, Shohei |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Mako surname: Yanai fullname: Yanai, Mako organization: Laboratory of RNA Viruses, Department of Virus Research, Institute for Frontier Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Laboratory of RNA Viruses, Department of Mammalian Regulatory Network, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan – sequence: 2 givenname: Shohei surname: Kojima fullname: Kojima, Shohei organization: Laboratory of RNA Viruses, Department of Virus Research, Institute for Frontier Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan – sequence: 3 givenname: Madoka surname: Sakai fullname: Sakai, Madoka organization: Laboratory of RNA Viruses, Department of Virus Research, Institute for Frontier Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Laboratory of RNA Viruses, Department of Mammalian Regulatory Network, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan – sequence: 4 givenname: Ryo surname: Komorizono fullname: Komorizono, Ryo organization: Laboratory of RNA Viruses, Department of Virus Research, Institute for Frontier Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Laboratory of RNA Viruses, Department of Mammalian Regulatory Network, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan – sequence: 5 givenname: Keizo surname: Tomonaga fullname: Tomonaga, Keizo organization: Laboratory of RNA Viruses, Department of Virus Research, Institute for Frontier Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Laboratory of RNA Viruses, Department of Mammalian Regulatory Network, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Department of Molecular Virology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan – sequence: 6 givenname: Akiko surname: Makino fullname: Makino, Akiko organization: Laboratory of RNA Viruses, Department of Virus Research, Institute for Frontier Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Laboratory of RNA Viruses, Department of Mammalian Regulatory Network, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31852792$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkUFv1DAQRi1URLeFG2fkIwdSPI4dOxekbUvLVtUiLVBxsxxn3Bpl7RInK_Hvm9BSUcTJI_nNm9F8B2QvpoiEvAZ2BMD1-4ur1REDCWUB9TOyAFbrQkoQe2TBGOeFLPX3fXKQ8w_GQIhKvCD7JWjJVc0XxC1PlxtOV5mu4i51O2xpiPQLdp7a2NJ1inmuN-jSdQxDSJEmT49THy09DRltRnoV-jHTc4xpGxzdrJezYrhBuh5dh2N-SZ5722V89fAekm9nH7-efCouP5-vTpaXhROSDYVGy5TnNQenvGwbrjS41jNtWysr0diq8gKVZb5BhgqEbVzJKlXXtkEosTwkH-69t2OzxdZhHHrbmds-bG3_yyQbzNOfGG7MddoZBVIrLibB2wdBn36OmAezDdlh19mIacyGl1yriklRT-ibv2c9Dvlz2Ql4dw-4PuXco39EgJk5ODMFZ34HZ2D28X9wFwY733vaNHT_b7oDfY6bYA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_it_2023_01_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbrc_2023_03_069 crossref_primary_10_3389_fimmu_2023_1286820 crossref_primary_10_3390_ncrna8020023 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10142_022_00910_3 crossref_primary_10_3389_fbioe_2021_792911 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms241612612 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_virology_091919_065320 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13046_023_02727_9 crossref_primary_10_1093_gbe_evab240 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tibs_2021_02_002 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2112663119 crossref_primary_10_1038_s44318_024_00314_y |
Cites_doi | 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3542 10.1002/1873-3468.12795 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.038 10.1126/science.1136567 10.1371/journal.pone.0108476 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5376 10.1128/jvi.76.23.12399-12404.2002 10.20506/rst.19.1.1217 10.1093/nar/gkp604 10.1126/science.1132998 10.1126/science.1170995 10.1074/jbc.270.29.17098 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90253-x 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006577 10.1186/s12985-017-0793-6 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1995.tb00598.x 10.1017/s1355838200000170 10.1128/jvi.66.2.992-998.1992 10.1038/ni1303 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.07.055 10.1128/JVI.79.10.6291-6298.2005 10.1126/science.aac7049 10.1038/19992 10.1073/pnas.91.24.11457 10.1038/nature24041 10.1038/379460a0 10.1016/j.virol.2011.10.024 10.1038/s41467-017-00354-5 10.1111/1348-0421.12505 10.1093/nar/gkh536 10.1128/JVI.02572-13 10.1093/nar/gkn923 10.1016/s0165-5728(03)00044-4 10.1016/0168-1702(85)90057-7 10.1093/emboj/17.4.1120 10.1038/323508a0 10.1128/JVI.00232-15 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90239-x 10.3390/v7052668 10.1128/JVI.02138-10 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4362 10.1073/pnas.1016759108 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90048-7 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90622-w 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04916.x 10.1128/JVI.01017-15 10.1016/s1286-4579(02)01564-2 10.1073/pnas.86.8.2647 10.1099/0022-1317-66-11-2479 10.1038/nprot.2008.211 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005166 10.1128/JVI.01299-15 10.1073/pnas.1006183107 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90568-j 10.1073/pnas.232416799 10.1016/j.chom.2012.04.011 10.1016/j.chom.2012.04.009 10.1099/vir.0.028043-0 10.1146/annurev-genet-120116-023425 10.1038/387303a0 10.1073/pnas.1017241108 10.1128/JVI.02457-08 10.1074/jbc.M115.709014 10.1093/nar/gkw1304 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003440 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00466-4 10.7554/eLife.25687 10.1073/pnas.89.23.11486 10.1128/JVI.02666-10 10.1074/jbc.M611392200 10.1021/bi001383g 10.1371/journal.pone.0002032 10.1016/j.virusres.2019.02.004 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology. Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology. 2020 American Society for Microbiology |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology. – notice: Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology. 2020 American Society for Microbiology |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1128/JVI.01513-19 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Biology |
DocumentTitleAlternate | ADAR2 and Innate Immune Response Induced by RNA Virus |
EISSN | 1098-5514 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC7158724 31852792 10_1128_JVI_01513_19 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X 0R~ 18M 29L 2WC 39C 4.4 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 85S AAFWJ AAGFI AAYXX ABPPZ ACGFO ACNCT ADBBV AENEX AGVNZ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BTFSW CITATION CS3 DIK E3Z EBS F5P FRP GX1 H13 HYE HZ~ IH2 KQ8 N9A O9- OK1 P2P RHI RNS RPM RSF TR2 UPT W2D W8F WH7 WOQ YQT ~02 ~KM NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-8ea07f2921c7f5db2781cdf08ada564ba66f4e7a0fbe0e714abc306799abe13e3 |
ISSN | 0022-538X 1098-5514 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 13:53:18 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 09:44:13 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 06:58:04 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:04:14 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:56:15 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Keywords | A-to-I editing nuclear-replicating RNA virus innate immunity persistent infection self/nonself |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c450t-8ea07f2921c7f5db2781cdf08ada564ba66f4e7a0fbe0e714abc306799abe13e3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Citation Yanai M, Kojima S, Sakai M, Komorizono R, Tomonaga K, Makino A. 2020. ADAR2 is involved in self and nonself recognition of Borna disease virus genomic RNA in the nucleus. J Virol 94:e01513-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01513-19. |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7158724 |
PMID | 31852792 |
PQID | 2328760549 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7158724 proquest_miscellaneous_2328760549 pubmed_primary_31852792 crossref_primary_10_1128_JVI_01513_19 crossref_citationtrail_10_1128_JVI_01513_19 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20200228 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-02-28 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 2 year: 2020 text: 20200228 day: 28 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: 1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC |
PublicationTitle | Journal of virology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Virol |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Society for Microbiology |
References | e_1_3_2_26_2 e_1_3_2_49_2 e_1_3_2_28_2 Tomaselli S (e_1_3_2_43_2) 2015; 17 e_1_3_2_41_2 e_1_3_2_64_2 e_1_3_2_20_2 e_1_3_2_62_2 e_1_3_2_22_2 e_1_3_2_68_2 e_1_3_2_24_2 e_1_3_2_47_2 e_1_3_2_66_2 e_1_3_2_60_2 e_1_3_2_9_2 e_1_3_2_16_2 e_1_3_2_37_2 e_1_3_2_7_2 e_1_3_2_18_2 e_1_3_2_39_2 e_1_3_2_54_2 e_1_3_2_75_2 e_1_3_2_10_2 e_1_3_2_31_2 e_1_3_2_52_2 e_1_3_2_73_2 e_1_3_2_5_2 e_1_3_2_12_2 e_1_3_2_33_2 e_1_3_2_58_2 e_1_3_2_3_2 e_1_3_2_14_2 e_1_3_2_35_2 e_1_3_2_56_2 e_1_3_2_50_2 e_1_3_2_71_2 e_1_3_2_27_2 e_1_3_2_48_2 Ludwig H (e_1_3_2_45_2) 1988; 35 e_1_3_2_29_2 e_1_3_2_40_2 e_1_3_2_65_2 e_1_3_2_21_2 e_1_3_2_42_2 e_1_3_2_63_2 e_1_3_2_23_2 e_1_3_2_44_2 e_1_3_2_69_2 e_1_3_2_25_2 e_1_3_2_46_2 e_1_3_2_67_2 e_1_3_2_61_2 e_1_3_2_15_2 e_1_3_2_38_2 e_1_3_2_8_2 e_1_3_2_17_2 e_1_3_2_59_2 e_1_3_2_6_2 e_1_3_2_19_2 e_1_3_2_30_2 e_1_3_2_53_2 e_1_3_2_76_2 e_1_3_2_32_2 e_1_3_2_51_2 e_1_3_2_74_2 e_1_3_2_11_2 e_1_3_2_34_2 e_1_3_2_57_2 e_1_3_2_4_2 e_1_3_2_13_2 e_1_3_2_36_2 e_1_3_2_55_2 e_1_3_2_2_2 e_1_3_2_72_2 e_1_3_2_70_2 |
References_xml | – ident: e_1_3_2_32_2 doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3542 – ident: e_1_3_2_19_2 doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12795 – ident: e_1_3_2_5_2 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.038 – ident: e_1_3_2_40_2 doi: 10.1126/science.1136567 – ident: e_1_3_2_37_2 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108476 – ident: e_1_3_2_15_2 doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5376 – ident: e_1_3_2_31_2 doi: 10.1128/jvi.76.23.12399-12404.2002 – ident: e_1_3_2_48_2 doi: 10.20506/rst.19.1.1217 – ident: e_1_3_2_36_2 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp604 – ident: e_1_3_2_59_2 doi: 10.1126/science.1132998 – ident: e_1_3_2_65_2 doi: 10.1126/science.1170995 – ident: e_1_3_2_54_2 doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.29.17098 – ident: e_1_3_2_10_2 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90253-x – ident: e_1_3_2_29_2 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006577 – ident: e_1_3_2_69_2 doi: 10.1186/s12985-017-0793-6 – ident: e_1_3_2_46_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1995.tb00598.x – ident: e_1_3_2_14_2 doi: 10.1017/s1355838200000170 – ident: e_1_3_2_57_2 doi: 10.1128/jvi.66.2.992-998.1992 – ident: e_1_3_2_2_2 doi: 10.1038/ni1303 – ident: e_1_3_2_72_2 doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.07.055 – ident: e_1_3_2_63_2 doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.10.6291-6298.2005 – ident: e_1_3_2_4_2 doi: 10.1126/science.aac7049 – ident: e_1_3_2_21_2 doi: 10.1038/19992 – ident: e_1_3_2_12_2 doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.24.11457 – ident: e_1_3_2_17_2 doi: 10.1038/nature24041 – ident: e_1_3_2_13_2 doi: 10.1038/379460a0 – ident: e_1_3_2_38_2 doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2011.10.024 – volume: 17 start-page: 37 year: 2015 ident: e_1_3_2_43_2 article-title: ADARs and the balance game between virus infection and innate immune cell response publication-title: Curr Issues Mol Biol – ident: e_1_3_2_66_2 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00354-5 – ident: e_1_3_2_71_2 doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12505 – ident: e_1_3_2_22_2 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh536 – ident: e_1_3_2_27_2 doi: 10.1128/JVI.02572-13 – ident: e_1_3_2_73_2 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn923 – ident: e_1_3_2_56_2 doi: 10.1016/s0165-5728(03)00044-4 – ident: e_1_3_2_68_2 doi: 10.1016/0168-1702(85)90057-7 – ident: e_1_3_2_24_2 doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.4.1120 – ident: e_1_3_2_30_2 doi: 10.1038/323508a0 – ident: e_1_3_2_60_2 doi: 10.1128/JVI.00232-15 – ident: e_1_3_2_9_2 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90239-x – ident: e_1_3_2_58_2 doi: 10.3390/v7052668 – ident: e_1_3_2_62_2 doi: 10.1128/JVI.02138-10 – ident: e_1_3_2_44_2 doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4362 – ident: e_1_3_2_50_2 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016759108 – ident: e_1_3_2_61_2 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90048-7 – ident: e_1_3_2_53_2 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90622-w – ident: e_1_3_2_64_2 doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04916.x – ident: e_1_3_2_28_2 doi: 10.1128/JVI.01017-15 – ident: e_1_3_2_47_2 doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(02)01564-2 – ident: e_1_3_2_11_2 doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.8.2647 – ident: e_1_3_2_67_2 doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-66-11-2479 – ident: e_1_3_2_74_2 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211 – ident: e_1_3_2_33_2 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005166 – ident: e_1_3_2_52_2 doi: 10.1128/JVI.01299-15 – ident: e_1_3_2_23_2 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006183107 – ident: e_1_3_2_25_2 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90568-j – ident: e_1_3_2_70_2 doi: 10.1073/pnas.232416799 – ident: e_1_3_2_6_2 doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.04.011 – ident: e_1_3_2_49_2 doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.04.009 – ident: e_1_3_2_39_2 doi: 10.1099/vir.0.028043-0 – ident: e_1_3_2_3_2 doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120116-023425 – ident: e_1_3_2_26_2 doi: 10.1038/387303a0 – ident: e_1_3_2_41_2 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017241108 – ident: e_1_3_2_35_2 doi: 10.1128/JVI.02457-08 – ident: e_1_3_2_8_2 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.709014 – ident: e_1_3_2_18_2 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1304 – ident: e_1_3_2_42_2 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003440 – ident: e_1_3_2_20_2 doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00466-4 – ident: e_1_3_2_7_2 doi: 10.7554/eLife.25687 – ident: e_1_3_2_75_2 doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.23.11486 – ident: e_1_3_2_34_2 doi: 10.1128/JVI.02666-10 – volume: 35 start-page: 107 year: 1988 ident: e_1_3_2_45_2 article-title: Borna disease: a persistent virus infection of the central nervous system publication-title: Prog Med Virol – ident: e_1_3_2_55_2 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611392200 – ident: e_1_3_2_16_2 doi: 10.1021/bi001383g – ident: e_1_3_2_51_2 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002032 – ident: e_1_3_2_76_2 doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2019.02.004 |
SSID | ssj0014464 |
Score | 2.406715 |
Snippet | Cells use the editing activity of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA proteins (ADARs) to prevent autoimmune responses induced by self dsRNA, but viruses can... Cells sense pathogen-derived double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) as nonself. To avoid autoimmune activation by self dsRNA, cells utilize A-to-I editing by adenosine... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
SubjectTerms | Virus-Cell Interactions |
Title | ADAR2 Is Involved in Self and Nonself Recognition of Borna Disease Virus Genomic RNA in the Nucleus |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31852792 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2328760549 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7158724 |
Volume | 94 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELbQIiQuiDflJSPBKcqSuEmcHMtL20X0UHZX5RQ5iaOGdmPUB9Lur2fGdh7dLdLCJapcx406X8Yz45lvCHkroiIOC7DchqUfugH3cjcbssRNMrBtExnzYaGzfCfR0WlwPAtnXUBfV5dsssP8cm9dyf9IFcZArlgl-w-SbReFAfgM8oUrSBiuN5Lx6NNoypzxGtky1PK3RB4lePuXpT4SmGCi9BK5RmyOkDENP2BPYmTdxIMZ56xabddIPo3Vyc50MmoTH5Ho2EYFrhuvWB3Xj8f_ELXpa_1NLFSrxNXP6lwbp9_nai6rNpojFs3kQi1EN_1crapL0wzcmV6ofkQC3M-uwrurEABFOjN7jFGsyFuK1llf85r2xhZh0X6FzrBI4fhsfAh2iz90rX7d4c2-sp-1WYbav2FxCnen-u4U-WFvM3AotPM9_tqeN4FTHDS88vjkTYkEi9_3f3vXeLnmkVxNrO1ZKif3yT0rJToyeHlAbsn6Ibljmo5ePCK5Rg0dr2mDGlrVFFFDATXUoob2UENVSTVqqEUN1aihFjUUUINLAGqoRc1jcvrl88nHI9e22nDzIPQ2biyFx0uWMD_nZVhkjMd-XpReLAoRRkEmoqgMJBdemUlPcj8QWY7OZpKITGIg_Qk5qFUtnxEqYBAUQwG-ggywv4EXgQuia7TLPJb-gDjNf5jmloce26Es033yGpB37exfhn_lL_PeNOJIQUHiqZeopdquU3AZYMcHzwTmPDXiaVfS1AE8YQPCdwTXTkDy9d1v6mquSdi5H8acBc9v-HwvyN3uVXlJDjarrXwF5uwme62R-AdY_Z2p |
linkProvider | Flying Publisher |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ADAR2+Is+Involved+in+Self+and+Nonself+Recognition+of+Borna+Disease+Virus+Genomic+RNA+in+the+Nucleus&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+virology&rft.au=Yanai%2C+Mako&rft.au=Kojima%2C+Shohei&rft.au=Sakai%2C+Madoka&rft.au=Komorizono%2C+Ryo&rft.date=2020-02-28&rft.issn=0022-538X&rft.eissn=1098-5514&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128%2FJVI.01513-19&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1128_JVI_01513_19 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-538X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-538X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-538X&client=summon |