Construction and analysis of tree models for chromosomal classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas

AIM: To construct tree models for classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) by chromosome copy numbers, to compare them with cDNA microarray classification, and to explore models of multi-gene, multi-step and multi-pathway processes of DLBCL tumorigenesis. METHODS: Maximum-weight bran...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 13; no. 11; pp. 1737 - 1742
Main Authors Jiang, Hui-Yong, Huang, Zhong-Xi, Zhang, Xue-Feng, Desper, Richard, Zhao, Tong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Department of General Surgery, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning Province, China%Department of Pathology,Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China%Department of Biology, University College London, Darwin Building, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT,United Kingdom 21.03.2007
Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:AIM: To construct tree models for classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) by chromosome copy numbers, to compare them with cDNA microarray classification, and to explore models of multi-gene, multi-step and multi-pathway processes of DLBCL tumorigenesis. METHODS: Maximum-weight branching and distance- based models were constructed based on the comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) data of 123 DLBCL samples using the established methods and software of Desper et al. A maximum likelihood tree model was also used to analyze the data. By comparing with the results reported in literature, values of tree models in the classification of DLBCL were elucidated. RESULTS: Both the branching and the distance-based trees classified DLBCL into three groups. We combined the classification methods of the two models and classified DLBCL into three categories according to their characteristics. The first group was marked by +Xq, +Xp, -17p and +13q; the second group by +3q, +18q and +18p; and the third group was marked by -6q and +6p. This chromosomal classification was consistent with cDNA classification. It indicated that -6q and +3q were two main events in the tumorigenesis of lymphoma. CONCLUSION: Tree models of lymphoma established from CGH data can be used in the classification of DLBCL. These models can suggest multi-gene, multistep and multi-pathway processes of tumorigenesis.Two pathways, -6q preceding +6q and +3q preceding +18q, may be important in understanding tumorigenesis of DLBCL. The pathway, -6q preceding +6q, may have a close relationship with the tumorigenesis of non-GCB DLBCL.
Bibliography:Subclassification
Comparative gene hybridization
14-1219/R
R733.4
Lymphoma; Subclassification; Comparative gene hybridization; Tree model; Tumorigenesis
Tree model
Tumorigenesis
Lymphoma
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Correspondence to: Richard Desper, Department of Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom. r.desper@ucl.ac.uk
Telephone: +86-20-62787274 Fax: +86-20-61642381
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
ISSN:1007-9327
2219-2840
DOI:10.3748/wjg.v13.i11.1737