Diagnostic value of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in the evaluation of osteoporosis in middle-aged and elderly patients
To study the correlation between calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and analyze the diagnostic value of calcaneal QUS in the evaluation of middle-aged and elderly osteoporosis.We assessed bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck and intertrochan...
Saved in:
Published in | Medicine (Baltimore) Vol. 101; no. 2; p. e28325 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
14.01.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To study the correlation between calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and analyze the diagnostic value of calcaneal QUS in the evaluation of middle-aged and elderly osteoporosis.We assessed bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck and intertrochanteric of left hip and lumbar spine (L1-L4) sites with DXA and QUS parameters of the right and left calcanei in a cohort of 82 patients over the age of 50 years. Using DXA parameters as the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the correlation coefficient between BMD and QUS parameters was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curve was generated and areas under the curves were evaluated. Cut-off values for QUS were defined.In men, there was a moderate correlation between calcaneal QUS and proximal femoral BMD (P < .05), but no significant correlation between calcaneal QUS and lumbar BMD (P > .05). In women, calcaneal QUS were moderately correlated with lumbar spine and proximal femoral BMD (P < .05). Using DXA as the gold standard, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of calcaneal QUS in the diagnosis of osteoporosis were 90.2%, 89.2%, 100%, 100%, and 50.0%, respectively. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, when the QUS T-score of calcaneum was -1.8, the area under the curve was 0.888, the sensitivity was 73.21%, and the specificity was 92.31% (P < .05). When the QUS T-score of calcaneum was -2.35, the sensitivity was 37.2% and the specificity was 100%.Calcaneal QUS can be used to predict proximal femoral BMD in middle-aged and elderly people, as well as lumbar BMD in women. As a screening method for osteoporosis, calcaneal QUS has good specificity, so it can be recommended to use it as a pre-screening tool to reduce the number of DXA screening. When the QUS T-score of calcaneum is -1.8, it has the greatest diagnostic efficiency for osteoporosis; when the QUS T-score of calcaneum is ≤-2.35, it can be diagnosed as osteoporosis. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To study the correlation between calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and analyze the diagnostic value of calcaneal QUS in the evaluation of middle-aged and elderly osteoporosis.
We assessed bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck and intertrochanteric of left hip and lumbar spine (L1–L4) sites with DXA and QUS parameters of the right and left calcanei in a cohort of 82 patients over the age of 50 years. Using DXA parameters as the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the correlation coefficient between BMD and QUS parameters was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curve was generated and areas under the curves were evaluated. Cut-off values for QUS were defined.
In men, there was a moderate correlation between calcaneal QUS and proximal femoral BMD (
P
< .05), but no significant correlation between calcaneal QUS and lumbar BMD (
P
> .05). In women, calcaneal QUS were moderately correlated with lumbar spine and proximal femoral BMD (
P
< .05). Using DXA as the gold standard, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of calcaneal QUS in the diagnosis of osteoporosis were 90.2%, 89.2%, 100%, 100%, and 50.0%, respectively. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, when the QUS T-score of calcaneum was –1.8, the area under the curve was 0.888, the sensitivity was 73.21%, and the specificity was 92.31% (
P
< .05). When the QUS T-score of calcaneum was –2.35, the sensitivity was 37.2% and the specificity was 100%.
Calcaneal QUS can be used to predict proximal femoral BMD in middle-aged and elderly people, as well as lumbar BMD in women. As a screening method for osteoporosis, calcaneal QUS has good specificity, so it can be recommended to use it as a pre-screening tool to reduce the number of DXA screening. When the QUS T-score of calcaneum is –1.8, it has the greatest diagnostic efficiency for osteoporosis; when the QUS T-score of calcaneum is ≤–2.35, it can be diagnosed as osteoporosis. To study the correlation between calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and analyze the diagnostic value of calcaneal QUS in the evaluation of middle-aged and elderly osteoporosis.We assessed bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck and intertrochanteric of left hip and lumbar spine (L1-L4) sites with DXA and QUS parameters of the right and left calcanei in a cohort of 82 patients over the age of 50 years. Using DXA parameters as the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the correlation coefficient between BMD and QUS parameters was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curve was generated and areas under the curves were evaluated. Cut-off values for QUS were defined.In men, there was a moderate correlation between calcaneal QUS and proximal femoral BMD (P < .05), but no significant correlation between calcaneal QUS and lumbar BMD (P > .05). In women, calcaneal QUS were moderately correlated with lumbar spine and proximal femoral BMD (P < .05). Using DXA as the gold standard, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of calcaneal QUS in the diagnosis of osteoporosis were 90.2%, 89.2%, 100%, 100%, and 50.0%, respectively. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, when the QUS T-score of calcaneum was -1.8, the area under the curve was 0.888, the sensitivity was 73.21%, and the specificity was 92.31% (P < .05). When the QUS T-score of calcaneum was -2.35, the sensitivity was 37.2% and the specificity was 100%.Calcaneal QUS can be used to predict proximal femoral BMD in middle-aged and elderly people, as well as lumbar BMD in women. As a screening method for osteoporosis, calcaneal QUS has good specificity, so it can be recommended to use it as a pre-screening tool to reduce the number of DXA screening. When the QUS T-score of calcaneum is -1.8, it has the greatest diagnostic efficiency for osteoporosis; when the QUS T-score of calcaneum is ≤-2.35, it can be diagnosed as osteoporosis. To study the correlation between calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and analyze the diagnostic value of calcaneal QUS in the evaluation of middle-aged and elderly osteoporosis.We assessed bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck and intertrochanteric of left hip and lumbar spine (L1-L4) sites with DXA and QUS parameters of the right and left calcanei in a cohort of 82 patients over the age of 50 years. Using DXA parameters as the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the correlation coefficient between BMD and QUS parameters was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curve was generated and areas under the curves were evaluated. Cut-off values for QUS were defined.In men, there was a moderate correlation between calcaneal QUS and proximal femoral BMD (P < .05), but no significant correlation between calcaneal QUS and lumbar BMD (P > .05). In women, calcaneal QUS were moderately correlated with lumbar spine and proximal femoral BMD (P < .05). Using DXA as the gold standard, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of calcaneal QUS in the diagnosis of osteoporosis were 90.2%, 89.2%, 100%, 100%, and 50.0%, respectively. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, when the QUS T-score of calcaneum was -1.8, the area under the curve was 0.888, the sensitivity was 73.21%, and the specificity was 92.31% (P < .05). When the QUS T-score of calcaneum was -2.35, the sensitivity was 37.2% and the specificity was 100%.Calcaneal QUS can be used to predict proximal femoral BMD in middle-aged and elderly people, as well as lumbar BMD in women. As a screening method for osteoporosis, calcaneal QUS has good specificity, so it can be recommended to use it as a pre-screening tool to reduce the number of DXA screening. When the QUS T-score of calcaneum is -1.8, it has the greatest diagnostic efficiency for osteoporosis; when the QUS T-score of calcaneum is ≤-2.35, it can be diagnosed as osteoporosis.ABSTRACTTo study the correlation between calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and analyze the diagnostic value of calcaneal QUS in the evaluation of middle-aged and elderly osteoporosis.We assessed bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck and intertrochanteric of left hip and lumbar spine (L1-L4) sites with DXA and QUS parameters of the right and left calcanei in a cohort of 82 patients over the age of 50 years. Using DXA parameters as the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the correlation coefficient between BMD and QUS parameters was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curve was generated and areas under the curves were evaluated. Cut-off values for QUS were defined.In men, there was a moderate correlation between calcaneal QUS and proximal femoral BMD (P < .05), but no significant correlation between calcaneal QUS and lumbar BMD (P > .05). In women, calcaneal QUS were moderately correlated with lumbar spine and proximal femoral BMD (P < .05). Using DXA as the gold standard, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of calcaneal QUS in the diagnosis of osteoporosis were 90.2%, 89.2%, 100%, 100%, and 50.0%, respectively. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, when the QUS T-score of calcaneum was -1.8, the area under the curve was 0.888, the sensitivity was 73.21%, and the specificity was 92.31% (P < .05). When the QUS T-score of calcaneum was -2.35, the sensitivity was 37.2% and the specificity was 100%.Calcaneal QUS can be used to predict proximal femoral BMD in middle-aged and elderly people, as well as lumbar BMD in women. As a screening method for osteoporosis, calcaneal QUS has good specificity, so it can be recommended to use it as a pre-screening tool to reduce the number of DXA screening. When the QUS T-score of calcaneum is -1.8, it has the greatest diagnostic efficiency for osteoporosis; when the QUS T-score of calcaneum is ≤-2.35, it can be diagnosed as osteoporosis. |
Author | Li, Changzhou Sun, Jifeng Yu, Li |
AuthorAffiliation | Orthopedics Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, China Dalian Medical University, China Orthopedics Department of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, China |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Dalian Medical University, China – name: Orthopedics Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, China – name: Orthopedics Department of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, China – name: b Dalian Medical University, China – name: a Orthopedics Department of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, China – name: c Orthopedics Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, China |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Changzhou surname: Li fullname: Li, Changzhou organization: Orthopedics Department of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, China – sequence: 2 givenname: Jifeng surname: Sun fullname: Sun, Jifeng organization: Dalian Medical University, China – sequence: 3 givenname: Li surname: Yu fullname: Yu, Li organization: Orthopedics Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, China |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35029176$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kUtv1DAUhS1URKeFX4CEsmST4thOHG-QUIeX1IoNrK0b52bG4LGnttOq4s_jdFoeXeCNJd_znSOfe0KOfPBIyMuGnjVUyTeX6zP657Ces_YJWTUt7-pWdeKIrMprW0slxTE5Sek7pQ2XTDwjx7ylTDWyW5GfawsbH1K2proGN2MVpsqAM-ARXHU1g882Q7bXWM0uR0hh9mNlfZW3WOGClGHwC1ZcMOxDDMmmRbGz4-iwhg2OFRQI3YjR3Vb7QqDP6Tl5OoFL-OL-PiXfPrz_ev6pvvjy8fP5u4vaiJZ2dUdh4IZTHJRRUg7U9AMVrJlYjwBiYBNvQXVGMap6GCc5IAjGjEIUQ98zfkreHnz387DD0ZTsCE7vo91BvNUBrP534u1Wb8K17mUrVU-Lwet7gxiuZkxZ72wy6FwpKcxJs45R2lPBVZG--jvrd8hD40WgDgJTekoRJ23u-g1LtHW6oXrZrr5c68fbLSx_xD7Y_58SB-omuIwx_XDzDUa9LfvN2zt5-SWrGWWMNo2g9fLU8V_TZrng |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2022_1004794 crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines11041175 crossref_primary_10_1177_20533691241265027 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_024_08553_7 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4201404 crossref_primary_10_1111_eci_14034 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jor_2023_11_043 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20115976 crossref_primary_10_1002_jbm4_10820 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00402_023_05031_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jor_2024_03_002 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s00198-004-1734-y 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.03.002 10.1002/jbmr.506 10.1210/jc.2014-4180 10.1177/1941738116664326 10.1055/s-0033-1333942 10.1007/s11547-010-0577-1 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.074 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-2-187 10.1007/s00198-004-1660-z 10.1089/jwh.2010.2682 10.1007/s00198-004-1780-5 10.1002/jbmr.1931 10.1016/j.mcna.2015.01.010 10.1007/s11657-013-0136-1 10.1038/s41598-020-71378-z 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.02.013 10.1007/978-981-13-3681-2_16 10.1016/j.jos.2019.01.003 10.1002/art.10277 10.5455/msm.2016.28.412-415 10.1007/s001980050281 10.1148/radiology.175.2.2326479 10.1177/1759720X11411600 10.1210/jcem-70-4-1202 10.1002/term.1790 10.1016/S0749-0690(02)00022-8 10.1007/s11604-006-0117-z 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.08.003 10.1007/s00223-011-9556-3 10.3389/fmed.2021.630009 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2009.08.001 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.10.002 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2022 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins – notice: Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. – notice: Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2022 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1097/MD.0000000000028325 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1536-5964 |
EndPage | e28325 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC8757980 35029176 10_1097_MD_0000000000028325 00005792-202201140-00006 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- .-D .XZ .Z2 01R 0R~ 354 40H 4Q1 4Q2 4Q3 5GY 5RE 5VS 71W 77Y 7O~ AAAAV AAGIX AAHPQ AAIQE AAMOA AAQKA AARTV AASCR AAWTL AAXQO AAYEP ABASU ABBUW ABCQX ABDIG ABFRF ABOCM ABVCZ ABXVJ ABZAD ABZZY ACDDN ACEWG ACGFO ACGFS ACILI ACLDA ACWDW ACWRI ACXJB ACXNZ ACZKN ADGGA ADHPY ADNKB ADPDF AE6 AEFWE AENEX AFBFQ AFDTB AGOPY AHOMT AHQNM AHVBC AIJEX AINUH AJCLO AJIOK AJNWD AJNYG AJZMW AKCTQ AKULP ALKUP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AOHHW AOQMC BQLVK CS3 DIWNM DU5 E.X EBS EEVPB ERAAH EX3 F2K F2L F2M F2N F5P FCALG FD6 FIJ FL- GNXGY GQDEL GROUPED_DOAJ H0~ HLJTE HYE HZ~ H~9 IKREB IKYAY IN~ IPNFZ JK3 JK8 K8S KD2 KMI KQ8 L-C N9A N~7 N~B O9- OAG OAH OB2 OHH OK1 OL1 OLB OLG OLH OLU OLV OLY OLZ OPUJH OUVQU OVD OVDNE OVEED OVIDH OVLEI OWV OWW OWZ OXXIT P2P RIG RLZ RPM RXW S4R S4S TAF TEORI TSPGW UNMZH V2I VVN W3M WOQ WOW X3V X3W XYM YFH YOC ZFV ZY1 AAYXX ADSXY CITATION 8L- ACIJW AWKKM CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ODA 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4506-60ab3c30eb9c977b0c8b0421f28eaa4b2f35a96c92098adf7bea422c9ee4b8823 |
ISSN | 0025-7974 1536-5964 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 17:47:21 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 12:33:26 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:24:46 EST 2025 Tue Aug 05 12:06:31 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:00:09 EDT 2025 Fri May 16 03:56:21 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4506-60ab3c30eb9c977b0c8b0421f28eaa4b2f35a96c92098adf7bea422c9ee4b8823 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-2648-9169 |
OpenAccessLink | http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028325 |
PMID | 35029176 |
PQID | 2620080439 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8757980 proquest_miscellaneous_2620080439 pubmed_primary_35029176 crossref_citationtrail_10_1097_MD_0000000000028325 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000028325 wolterskluwer_health_00005792-202201140-00006 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20220114 2022-01-14 2022-Jan-14 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-01-14 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2022 text: 20220114 day: 14 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Hagerstown, MD |
PublicationTitle | Medicine (Baltimore) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Medicine (Baltimore) |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
Publisher_xml | – name: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
References | Golob (R2-20250504) 2015; 99 Boonen (R14-20250504) 2005; 16 Chiavaras (R29-20250504) 2013; 17 Roldan (R32-20250504) 2017; 21 Steiger (R12-20250504) 1990; 175 Imashuku (R17-20250504) 2007; 25 Orwoll (R8-20250504) 1990; 70 Coughlan (R3-20250504) 2014; 14 Chan (R35-20250504) 2012; 90 Dontas (R22-20250504) 2007; 7 Yu (R9-20250504) 2012; 27 Krueger (R15-20250504) 2018; 21 Gary (R18-20250504) 2007; 10 Johnell (R5-20250504) 2006; 17 Schulze-Späte (R38-20250504) 2015; 100 Albanese (R37-20250504) 2011; 116 Adams (R10-20250504) 2009; 71 Olszynski (R36-20250504) 2013; 28 Dhainaut (R7-20250504) 2011; 20 Kanis (R25-20250504) 2000; 11 Hernlund (R4-20250504) 2013; 8 Guglielmi (R16-20250504) 2010; 48 Nwawka (R28-20250504) 2016; 8 Canhão (R13-20250504) 2006; 31 Srivastava (R1-20250504) 2002; 18 Aspray (R23-20250504) 2019; 91 Kanis (R27-20250504) 2005; 16 Yaguchi (R33-20250504) 2016; 10 Kanis (R26-20250504) 2005; 16 Adler (R24-20250504) 2011; 3 Han (R30-20250504) 2021; 8 Aluclu (R34-20250504) 2016; 3 Blake (R6-20250504) 2010; 40 Chang (R31-20250504) 2020; 10 Bijelic (R19-20250504) 2016; 28 Matsumoto (R21-20250504) 2019; 24 Rehman (R11-20250504) 2002; 46 |
References_xml | – volume: 16 start-page: 737 year: 2005 ident: R26-20250504 article-title: Alcohol intake as a risk factor for fracture publication-title: Osteoporos Int doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1734-y – volume: 10 start-page: 239 year: 2007 ident: R18-20250504 article-title: Effect of precision error on T-scores and diagnostic classification of bone status publication-title: J Clin Densitom doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.03.002 – volume: 27 start-page: 119 year: 2012 ident: R9-20250504 article-title: Simulated increases in body fat and errors in bone mineral density measurements by DXA and QCT publication-title: J Bone Miner Res doi: 10.1002/jbmr.506 – volume: 100 start-page: 2425 year: 2015 ident: R38-20250504 article-title: Relationship of bone metabolism biomarkers and periodontal disease: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study publication-title: J Clin Endocrinol Metab doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-4180 – volume: 8 start-page: 429 year: 2016 ident: R28-20250504 article-title: Update in musculoskeletal ultrasound research publication-title: Sports Health doi: 10.1177/1941738116664326 – volume: 17 start-page: 85 year: 2013 ident: R29-20250504 article-title: Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration publication-title: Semin Musculoskelet Radiol doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1333942 – volume: 116 start-page: 92 year: 2011 ident: R37-20250504 article-title: Quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges and DXA of the lumbar spine and proximal femur in evaluating the risk of osteoporotic vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women publication-title: Radiol Med doi: 10.1007/s11547-010-0577-1 – volume: 71 start-page: 415 year: 2009 ident: R10-20250504 article-title: Quantitative computed tomography publication-title: Eur J Radiol doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.074 – volume: 17 start-page: 1726 year: 2006 ident: R5-20250504 article-title: An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures publication-title: Osteoporos Int doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4 – volume: 14 start-page: 187 year: 2014 ident: R3-20250504 article-title: Osteoporosis and fracture risk in older people publication-title: Clin Med (Lond) doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-2-187 – volume: 16 start-page: 93 year: 2005 ident: R14-20250504 article-title: Identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by calcaneal ultrasound, metacarpal digital X-ray radiogrammetry and phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry: a comparative study publication-title: Osteoporos Int doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1660-z – volume: 20 start-page: 1789 year: 2011 ident: R7-20250504 article-title: Phalangeal densitometry compared with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of bone mineral density in elderly women publication-title: J Womens Health doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2682 – volume: 16 start-page: 581 year: 2005 ident: R27-20250504 article-title: Assessment of fracture risk publication-title: Osteoporos Int doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1780-5 – volume: 7 start-page: 268 year: 2007 ident: R22-20250504 article-title: Risk factors and prevention of osteoporosis-related fractures publication-title: J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact – volume: 28 start-page: 2027 year: 2013 ident: R36-20250504 article-title: Multisite quantitative ultrasound for the prediction of fractures over 5 years of follow-up: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study publication-title: J Bone Miner Res doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1931 – volume: 99 start-page: 587 year: 2015 ident: R2-20250504 article-title: Osteoporosis: screening, prevention, and management publication-title: Med Clin North Am doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2015.01.010 – volume: 8 start-page: 136 year: 2013 ident: R4-20250504 article-title: Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA) publication-title: Arch Osteoporos doi: 10.1007/s11657-013-0136-1 – volume: 10 start-page: 14357 year: 2020 ident: R31-20250504 article-title: Ultrasound measurements of superficial and deep masticatory muscles in various postures: reliability and influencers publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71378-z – volume: 48 start-page: 577 year: 2010 ident: R16-20250504 article-title: Quantitative ultrasound in osteoporosis and bone metabolism pathologies publication-title: Radiol Clin North Am doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.02.013 – volume: 3 start-page: 201 year: 2016 ident: R34-20250504 article-title: Normal range of BMD in proximal tibia as a different skeletal site at women publication-title: North Clin Istanb – volume: 91 start-page: 453 year: 2019 ident: R23-20250504 article-title: Osteoporosis and the ageing skeleton publication-title: Subcell Biochem doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-3681-2_16 – volume: 24 start-page: 906 year: 2019 ident: R21-20250504 article-title: Association between speed of sound of calcaneal bone assessed by quantitative ultrasound and sarcopenia in a general older adult population: a cross-sectional study publication-title: J Orthop Sci doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.01.003 – volume: 46 start-page: 1292 year: 2002 ident: R11-20250504 article-title: Quantitative computed tomography of the lumbar spine, not dual x-ray absorptiometry, is an independent predictor of prevalent vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteopenia receiving long-term glucocorticoid and hormone-replacement therapy publication-title: Arthritis Rheum doi: 10.1002/art.10277 – volume: 28 start-page: 412 year: 2016 ident: R19-20250504 article-title: Correlation of the lipid profile, BMI and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women publication-title: Mater Sociomed doi: 10.5455/msm.2016.28.412-415 – volume: 11 start-page: 192 year: 2000 ident: R25-20250504 article-title: An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry publication-title: Osteoporos Int doi: 10.1007/s001980050281 – volume: 175 start-page: 537 year: 1990 ident: R12-20250504 article-title: Spinal bone mineral density measured with quantitative CT: effect of region of interest, vertebral level, and technique publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiology.175.2.2326479 – volume: 3 start-page: 191 year: 2011 ident: R24-20250504 article-title: Osteoporosis in men: insights for the clinician publication-title: Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis doi: 10.1177/1759720X11411600 – volume: 31 start-page: 65 year: 2006 ident: R13-20250504 article-title: Normative data for quantitative ultrasound measurement of the calcaneus in a Portuguese population publication-title: Acta Reumatol Port – volume: 70 start-page: 1202 year: 1990 ident: R8-20250504 article-title: The impact of osteophytic and vascular calcifications on vertebral mineral density measurements in men publication-title: J Clin Endocrinol Metab doi: 10.1210/jcem-70-4-1202 – volume: 10 start-page: 188 year: 2016 ident: R33-20250504 article-title: Middle ear mucosal regeneration with three-dimensionally tissue-engineered autologous middle ear cell sheets in rabbit model publication-title: J Tissue Eng Regen Med doi: 10.1002/term.1790 – volume: 18 start-page: 529 year: 2002 ident: R1-20250504 article-title: Osteoporosis in elderly: prevention and treatment publication-title: Clin Geriatr Med doi: 10.1016/S0749-0690(02)00022-8 – volume: 25 start-page: 148 year: 2007 ident: R17-20250504 article-title: Comparisons of bone mass measurements on various skeletal sites including quantitative ultrasonography of the calcaneus for assessing age-related losses, their correlations, and diagnostic agreement using the Japanese and WHO criteria for osteoporosis publication-title: Radiat Med doi: 10.1007/s11604-006-0117-z – volume: 21 start-page: 581 year: 2017 ident: R32-20250504 article-title: Comparison between the gold standard DXA with calcaneal quantitative ultrasound based-strategy (QUS) to detect osteoporosis in an HIV infected cohort publication-title: Braz J Infect Dis doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.08.003 – volume: 90 start-page: 128 year: 2012 ident: R35-20250504 article-title: Absolute fracture-risk prediction by a combination of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density publication-title: Calcif Tissue Int doi: 10.1007/s00223-011-9556-3 – volume: 8 start-page: 630009 year: 2021 ident: R30-20250504 article-title: Associated with increased risks of rotator cuff tendon diseases among community-dwelling elders: a cross-sectional quantitative ultrasound study publication-title: Front Med doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.630009 – volume: 40 start-page: 62 year: 2010 ident: R6-20250504 article-title: An update on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry publication-title: Semin Nucl Med doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2009.08.001 – volume: 21 start-page: 155 year: 2018 ident: R15-20250504 article-title: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry quality matters publication-title: J Clin Densitom doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.10.002 |
SSID | ssj0013724 |
Score | 2.4419413 |
Snippet | To study the correlation between calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and analyze the diagnostic value of... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref wolterskluwer |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | e28325 |
SubjectTerms | Absorptiometry, Photon Aged Bone Density Calcaneus - diagnostic imaging Female Humans Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging Male Middle Aged Observational Study Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging Sensitivity and Specificity Ultrasonography |
Title | Diagnostic value of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in the evaluation of osteoporosis in middle-aged and elderly patients |
URI | https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00005792-202201140-00006 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35029176 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2620080439 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8757980 |
Volume | 101 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELfKJiEkhPgmfExG4g0yEjtffgRaNCEKLxvaW2SnDosoCayNkMYrfzh3duKkWzUx-lBVqRMlvl_Od-e73xHygieg4qIs9GE5XWBJTuKLjIU-VwX4z0xybmgX55-Sg6Pow3F8PJn8GWUttWu1X5xtrSv5H6nCMZArVsleQbLuonAAfoN84RskDN__JOOpzZNDzlUk7TbuP8w5zBbSBf9sZW1KyDA5qF2uT-UKeyj1mY0DzzeehrUeDdjiDRKUwIjvJnDhg7YxXK4vNXbzxkiI5WFdjY3aebc_j9bqW7lcVzZ514UYPlbdxn799eykaYd9KFsXUpW6Wz5NgzAbKRhHIximdfi2CtRVByAFpu28s697pZr4sbBs5U7rdjGMauT9Wh2qsXtSvFW9W9rg-dSyTtqPG71Jpn1ukXOph_2m-3yan7_INbLLwNkAbbn7-ctsNh12o1IWuda_8Gw9e5VIX2-5l00L54LbcjH79uavBjMjVt9MYcTIvDm8TW51fgl9Y0F2h0x0fZdc7yV7j_wesEYN1mhTUoc1OsYaHbBGq5oC1uiANTxtjDUcMcIaBazRDmu0x9p9cvR-dvjuwO8ad_hFFAeJnwRS8YIHWokC_AsVFJmCxSEsWaaljBQreSxFUggWiEwuylRpGTFWCK0jBS4ff0B26qbWjwiNmBILsJnZgmfgy4cykHwR8zIUOky5Uh5h_WTnRcdqj81VlvklgvbIK3fSD0vqcvnw570Uc1C-uKMGc9u0qxy7OYDLBUa9Rx5aqboL8jhgIkwTj6Qb8nYDkNh985-6OjEE79hkQmSBR_wNZOS2NNrcHwxgPr6AGNAw3BBB8vhqj_WE3Ojf4CB8SnbWp61-Bhb2Wu2ZyNRe9xr8BaRry08 |
linkProvider | Ovid |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3db9MwELfQJgESQnxugQFGQnkikNjOhx_6UDUZZSwFqR2Mp8hOHFFRkkFaJsQ_z12SdpQJJPqSSrYTyXe2f-e7-x0hz3gAW5yIPAeO0wJTcgJHRsxzuM7BfmaK85Z2MZ0E4xNxdOqf9tEWmAuD2WfN2Qt8tPs0_sF6OGgYzgZHU3uSfJgOKns0HQ0-2u-Gr5L2nhqjJOx4UH8vl_Zw0sZf-aFkoAMMTzjRZk8jM_du4LMQFvDu2_dJEl_4G0ImNsVdAWKv-Ylk-DKNO47D7oeVffztM-wSML0cX3njvEbfd_O5DX3_7QA7vEVu9siTDjtVuU2umOoOuZr2vvW75GfcRd1BM0UKcEPrkoIEYe4BTNKvK1W1CWmwPdLVAr7YYEUmOq8oYEh6wRqOwzBzpAZkXzfzBnt8aa9BHNi7CqpgkMHa4IsftGd1be6Rk8NkNho7fWkGJxe-GziBqzTPuWu0zAFBajePNCx_r2SRUUpoVnJfySCXzJWRKspQGyUYy6UxQgOo5_fJTlVXZp9QwbQsABWxgkdgrXnKVbzweelJ44Vca4uw9WRnec9bjuUzFtnaf57G2Z8SssjzzaCzjrbj392frqWYwfJCnwnMbb1qMuTrB1ANsM0ie51UNy_kvsvA2g0sEm7Je9MBqbu3W6r5p5bCG8sIyMi1iLOlGVmX_Jr9TX8f_Gf_J-TaeJYeZ8evJ28ekuvYitdHnjggO8tvK_MIANVSP-5Xwy93oBS9 |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3db9MwED-NTpqQEOKb8GkklCeCEjtJk4c8TE3KGLSb1A22p8hOHFGtSwZpQRP_PHf56ChDSOQlkXxOIp99_tnn-x3Aa-GjiXMDx8LpNKeQHN8KA-5YQmW4fuZSiIZ2cTL1947d_RPvZAt6jykFn9UXb-nWmGl6oHQ4tC48ivZn5mg2ik7NafJ5Fk3Nw913SbNNTYckzMN4HF2acVR9L5ZmfBD1_IyTuCUpbC9KzePdgO0gQCA_gO2DT0kSX_kdhtxdJ3lFqN3zFP39NZtz2TWAev2c5a0fFfnA67PmCPxvE9n4DtzuECjbbbvMXdjS5T3YmXQ-9vvwM25P32ExIypwzaqCoSZRBwgq2deVLJvANDSTbLXAL9aUmYnNS4ZYkl2xh1M1iiCpEOFX9bwmifNmO8RCG5YziZU05QhfXLKO3bV-AMfj5Gi0Z3UpGqzM9Wzf8m2pRCZsrcIMkaSys0ChGXAKHmgpXcUL4cnQz0Juh4HMi6HS0uU8C7V2FYJ78RAGZVXqx8BcrsIc0RHPRYCrNkfaUuSeKJxQO0OhlAG8b-w06_jLKY3GIu396JM4_VNDBrxZV7po6Tv-Lf6q12KKw4x8J9i21apOibcfwTXCNwMetVpdv1B4NsdVr2_AcEPfawGi8N4sKedfGipvSicQBrYB1kbPSNsg2Ob_UICjLeOE1NyGBcD2n_yn_EvYwdGRfnw__fAUblIh7SI57jMYLL-t9HPEVUv1ohsMvwDJjBZV |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic+value+of+calcaneal+quantitative+ultrasound+in+the+evaluation+of+osteoporosis+in+middle-aged+and+elderly+patients&rft.jtitle=Medicine+%28Baltimore%29&rft.au=Li%2C+Changzhou&rft.au=Sun%2C+Jifeng&rft.au=Yu%2C+Li&rft.date=2022-01-14&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.eissn=1536-5964&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e28325&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FMD.0000000000028325&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1097_MD_0000000000028325 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0025-7974&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0025-7974&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0025-7974&client=summon |