Temporal Interactions during Paired-Electrode Stimulation in Two Retinal Prosthesis Subjects
Since 2002, six blind patients have undergone implantation of an epiretinal 4 × 4 electrode array designed to directly stimulate the remaining cells of the retina after severe photoreceptor degeneration due to retinitis pigmentosa. This study was conducted to investigate how the brightness of percep...
Saved in:
Published in | Investigative ophthalmology & visual science Vol. 52; no. 1; pp. 549 - 557 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc
01.01.2011
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Since 2002, six blind patients have undergone implantation of an epiretinal 4 × 4 electrode array designed to directly stimulate the remaining cells of the retina after severe photoreceptor degeneration due to retinitis pigmentosa. This study was conducted to investigate how the brightness of percepts is affected by pulse timing across electrodes in two of these patients.
Subjects compared the perceived brightness of a standard stimulus (synchronous pulse trains presented across pairs of electrodes) to the perceived brightness of a test stimulus (pulse trains across the electrode pair phase shifted by 0.075, 0.375, 1.8, or 9 ms). The current amplitude necessary for each phase-shifted test stimulus to match the brightness of the standard was determined.
Depending on the electrode pair, interactions between electrodes were either facilitatory (the perceived brightness produced by stimulating the pair of electrodes was greater than that produced by stimulating either electrode alone) or suppressive (the perceived brightness produced by stimulating the pair of electrodes was less than that produced by stimulating either electrode alone). The amount of interaction between electrodes decreased as a function of increased separation both in time (the phase-shift between pulse trains) and space (center-to-center distance between the electrode pair).
For visual prostheses to represent visual scenes that are changing in both space and time requires the development of spatiotemporal models describing the effects of stimulation across multiple electrodes. During multielectrode stimulation, interactions between electrodes have a significant influence on subjective brightness that includes both facilitatory and suppressive effects, and these interactions can be described with a simple computational model. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00279500.). |
---|---|
AbstractList | Since 2002, six blind patients have undergone implantation of an epiretinal 4 × 4 electrode array designed to directly stimulate the remaining cells of the retina after severe photoreceptor degeneration due to retinitis pigmentosa. This study was conducted to investigate how the brightness of percepts is affected by pulse timing across electrodes in two of these patients.PURPOSESince 2002, six blind patients have undergone implantation of an epiretinal 4 × 4 electrode array designed to directly stimulate the remaining cells of the retina after severe photoreceptor degeneration due to retinitis pigmentosa. This study was conducted to investigate how the brightness of percepts is affected by pulse timing across electrodes in two of these patients.Subjects compared the perceived brightness of a standard stimulus (synchronous pulse trains presented across pairs of electrodes) to the perceived brightness of a test stimulus (pulse trains across the electrode pair phase shifted by 0.075, 0.375, 1.8, or 9 ms). The current amplitude necessary for each phase-shifted test stimulus to match the brightness of the standard was determined.METHODSSubjects compared the perceived brightness of a standard stimulus (synchronous pulse trains presented across pairs of electrodes) to the perceived brightness of a test stimulus (pulse trains across the electrode pair phase shifted by 0.075, 0.375, 1.8, or 9 ms). The current amplitude necessary for each phase-shifted test stimulus to match the brightness of the standard was determined.Depending on the electrode pair, interactions between electrodes were either facilitatory (the perceived brightness produced by stimulating the pair of electrodes was greater than that produced by stimulating either electrode alone) or suppressive (the perceived brightness produced by stimulating the pair of electrodes was less than that produced by stimulating either electrode alone). The amount of interaction between electrodes decreased as a function of increased separation both in time (the phase-shift between pulse trains) and space (center-to-center distance between the electrode pair).RESULTSDepending on the electrode pair, interactions between electrodes were either facilitatory (the perceived brightness produced by stimulating the pair of electrodes was greater than that produced by stimulating either electrode alone) or suppressive (the perceived brightness produced by stimulating the pair of electrodes was less than that produced by stimulating either electrode alone). The amount of interaction between electrodes decreased as a function of increased separation both in time (the phase-shift between pulse trains) and space (center-to-center distance between the electrode pair).For visual prostheses to represent visual scenes that are changing in both space and time requires the development of spatiotemporal models describing the effects of stimulation across multiple electrodes. During multielectrode stimulation, interactions between electrodes have a significant influence on subjective brightness that includes both facilitatory and suppressive effects, and these interactions can be described with a simple computational model. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00279500.).CONCLUSIONSFor visual prostheses to represent visual scenes that are changing in both space and time requires the development of spatiotemporal models describing the effects of stimulation across multiple electrodes. During multielectrode stimulation, interactions between electrodes have a significant influence on subjective brightness that includes both facilitatory and suppressive effects, and these interactions can be described with a simple computational model. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00279500.). During multielectrode stimulation, interactions between electrodes have a significant influence on subjective brightness that can be either facilitatory or suppressive. These interactions can be described in a simple computational model that may provide some insight into the underlying electrical and neural mechanisms responsible for spatiotemporal integration during multielectrode stimulation of the human retina. Since 2002, six blind patients have undergone implantation of an epiretinal 4 × 4 electrode array designed to directly stimulate the remaining cells of the retina after severe photoreceptor degeneration due to retinitis pigmentosa. This study was conducted to investigate how the brightness of percepts is affected by pulse timing across electrodes in two of these patients. Subjects compared the perceived brightness of a standard stimulus (synchronous pulse trains presented across pairs of electrodes) to the perceived brightness of a test stimulus (pulse trains across the electrode pair phase shifted by 0.075, 0.375, 1.8, or 9 ms). The current amplitude necessary for each phase-shifted test stimulus to match the brightness of the standard was determined. Depending on the electrode pair, interactions between electrodes were either facilitatory (the perceived brightness produced by stimulating the pair of electrodes was greater than that produced by stimulating either electrode alone) or suppressive (the perceived brightness produced by stimulating the pair of electrodes was less than that produced by stimulating either electrode alone). The amount of interaction between electrodes decreased as a function of increased separation both in time (the phase-shift between pulse trains) and space (center-to-center distance between the electrode pair). For visual prostheses to represent visual scenes that are changing in both space and time requires the development of spatiotemporal models describing the effects of stimulation across multiple electrodes. During multielectrode stimulation, interactions between electrodes have a significant influence on subjective brightness that includes both facilitatory and suppressive effects, and these interactions can be described with a simple computational model. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00279500.). |
Author | Fine, Ione Boynton, Geoffrey M. Greenberg, Robert J. Horsager, Alan |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Alan surname: Horsager fullname: Horsager, Alan organization: From the Neuroscience Graduate Program and the 2Institute for Genetic Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California – sequence: 2 givenname: Geoffrey M. surname: Boynton fullname: Boynton, Geoffrey M. organization: the Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and – sequence: 3 givenname: Robert J. surname: Greenberg fullname: Greenberg, Robert J. organization: Second Sight Medical Products, Inc., Sylmar, California – sequence: 4 givenname: Ione surname: Fine fullname: Fine, Ione organization: the Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20720224$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptUctKxDAUDaL43rmW7txYTdI2aTeCiC8YUHTcCSFNb2cibTImqeLfm-ooKq5uLjkP7jlbaNVYAwjtEXxECOPH2r74I4LTgpZ0BW2SoqBpwcts9cd7A215_4QxJYTidbRBMaeY0nwTPU6hX1gnu-TaBHBSBW2NT5rBaTNLbqV20KTnHajgbAPJfdD90MkRlGiTTF9tcgdBm8i_ddaHOXjtk_uhfooMv4PWWtl52F3ObfRwcT49u0onN5fXZ6eTVOV5FdKctznnNSOK8pazlldtxbKswjzLa6BV2zDCGskyVqtalXUroYBIbQqSV3Whsm108qm7GOoeGgUmxIvEwuleujdhpRa_f4yei5l9ERkuMlrxKHCwFHD2eQAfRK-9gq6TBuzgRZlXGJecsYjc_2n17fGVaATQT4CKeXgHrVA6fAQWnXUnCBZjbWKsbVzG2iLp8A_pS_df-DtnY5zF |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2560_10_3_036002 crossref_primary_10_1038_mt_2011_69 crossref_primary_10_1097_WCO_0b013e32834f02c3 crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_ac7615 crossref_primary_10_1586_17434440_2014_862494 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tibtech_2013_07_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brs_2022_03_008 crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2560_10_5_056011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neulet_2012_02_001 crossref_primary_10_1186_1743_0003_8_44 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_45416_4 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0228861 crossref_primary_10_1126_scitranslmed_aac4877 crossref_primary_10_1167_iovs_64_15_5 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2017_00620 crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_aba560 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2014_0208 crossref_primary_10_1167_tvst_9_8_25 crossref_primary_10_1039_C4FD00040D crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_abecf1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinph_2019_11_029 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00417_015_3121_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_preteyeres_2015_09_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2015_04_012 crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_ac7326 crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2560_8_4_046016 crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2560_8_6_066007 crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_ad31c4 crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_aab1b8 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1167/iovs.10-5282 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1552-5783 |
EndPage | 557 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC3053297 20720224 10_1167_iovs_10_5282 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: EY012893 – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: EY014645 – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: P30 EY001730 – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: R01 EY014645 – fundername: National Institutes of Health grantid: NEI EY012893 EY014645 |
GroupedDBID | --- 18M 2WC 34G 39C 5GY 5RE AAYXX ACGFO ACNCT ADBBV AENEX AFOSN ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD F5P GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 N9A OK1 P2P RPM SJN TR2 TRV W8F WH7 WOQ WOW .55 .GJ 53G AFFNX AI. CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM VH1 X7M ZGI ZXP 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-47f477b61c27f76f79f963390734be29fd616da636bcbc8bfae5ec44d5149b5c3 |
ISSN | 1552-5783 0146-0404 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:31:22 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 19:57:33 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:00:04 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:53:18 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:53 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c449t-47f477b61c27f76f79f963390734be29fd616da636bcbc8bfae5ec44d5149b5c3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3053297 |
PMID | 20720224 |
PQID | 849008766 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3053297 proquest_miscellaneous_849008766 pubmed_primary_20720224 crossref_citationtrail_10_1167_iovs_10_5282 crossref_primary_10_1167_iovs_10_5282 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2011-01-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2011-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2011 text: 2011-01-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Investigative ophthalmology & visual science |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci |
PublicationYear | 2011 |
Publisher | Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc |
References | 11800459 - Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1314-29 18515576 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jun;49(6):2303-14 19741248 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Feb;51(2):1223-33 14638739 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Dec;44(12):5362-9 18774912 - Hum Gene Ther. 2008 Oct;19(10):979-90 9109761 - Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Apr;115(4):511-5 11853755 - Vision Res. 2002 Feb;42(4):393-9 18562624 - J Neurosci. 2008 Jun 18;28(25):6526-36 18836071 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 14;105(41):16009-14 13129543 - Vision Res. 2003 Nov;43(24):2573-81 6575638 - Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1983;405:123-36 19608533 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Nov;50(11):5017-25 18216234 - J Neurophysiol. 2008 Mar;99(3):1408-21 16870840 - J Neurophysiol. 2006 Nov;96(5):2792-6 18434523 - J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 23;28(17):4446-56 18809924 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 30;105(39):15112-7 16236780 - J Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;95(2):970-8 16116447 - Nat Neurosci. 2005 Sep;8(9):1263-8 16600853 - Neuron. 2006 Apr 6;50(1):23-33 13441853 - Psychol Rev. 1957 May;64(3):153-81 16469187 - Vis Neurosci. 2005 Nov-Dec;22(6):769-87 18441371 - N Engl J Med. 2008 May 22;358(21):2231-9 14615590 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Nov 25;100(24):13940-5 17521567 - Neuron. 2007 May 24;54(4):535-45 8263821 - J Rehabil Res Dev. 1993;30(1):110-6 17362868 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 May;143(5):820-827 16338109 - Hear Res. 2006 Jan;211(1-2):33-45 14587604 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Oct;114(4 Pt 1):2049-57 15558062 - Nat Neurosci. 2004 Dec;7(12):1381-6 17059359 - Annu Rev Physiol. 2007;69:271-90 16255687 - Clin Exp Optom. 2005 Sep;88(5):282-91 15051882 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 6;101(14):5170-3 17483470 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 8;104(19):8143-8 16003900 - IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005 Jun;13(2):201-6 19660665 - Prog Brain Res. 2009;175:317-32 10396625 - Vision Res. 1999 Jul;39(15):2569-76 6702974 - Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Mar;97(3):357-65 19163027 - Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:1785-8 15876650 - J Neural Eng. 2005 Mar;2(1):S16-21 19583479 - Hum Gene Ther. 2009 Sep;20(9):999-1004 14576452 - Mol Neurobiol. 2003 Oct;28(2):139-47 9888437 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Jan;40(1):143-8 15078664 - Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):477-85 3808045 - Nature. 1987 Jan 29-Feb 4;325(6103):439-41 12948604 - Hear Res. 2003 Aug;182(1-2):77-87 19675341 - N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 13;361(7):725-7 19109509 - J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 24;28(52):14282-92 5500775 - J Physiol. 1970 Sep;210(1):165-86 18432197 - Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jun;11(6):667-75 19098313 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Apr;50(4):1483-91 17296890 - Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 Feb;125(2):151-8 17271222 - Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2004;6:4172-3 3042323 - Doc Ophthalmol. 1988 Mar-Apr;68(3-4):257-71 |
References_xml | – reference: 18836071 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 14;105(41):16009-14 – reference: 11800459 - Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1314-29 – reference: 18774912 - Hum Gene Ther. 2008 Oct;19(10):979-90 – reference: 17521567 - Neuron. 2007 May 24;54(4):535-45 – reference: 11853755 - Vision Res. 2002 Feb;42(4):393-9 – reference: 13441853 - Psychol Rev. 1957 May;64(3):153-81 – reference: 5500775 - J Physiol. 1970 Sep;210(1):165-86 – reference: 6575638 - Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1983;405:123-36 – reference: 19583479 - Hum Gene Ther. 2009 Sep;20(9):999-1004 – reference: 6702974 - Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Mar;97(3):357-65 – reference: 15051882 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 6;101(14):5170-3 – reference: 12948604 - Hear Res. 2003 Aug;182(1-2):77-87 – reference: 18432197 - Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jun;11(6):667-75 – reference: 19098313 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Apr;50(4):1483-91 – reference: 8263821 - J Rehabil Res Dev. 1993;30(1):110-6 – reference: 19741248 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Feb;51(2):1223-33 – reference: 15558062 - Nat Neurosci. 2004 Dec;7(12):1381-6 – reference: 17483470 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 8;104(19):8143-8 – reference: 17362868 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 May;143(5):820-827 – reference: 19163027 - Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:1785-8 – reference: 16600853 - Neuron. 2006 Apr 6;50(1):23-33 – reference: 18562624 - J Neurosci. 2008 Jun 18;28(25):6526-36 – reference: 16236780 - J Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;95(2):970-8 – reference: 17059359 - Annu Rev Physiol. 2007;69:271-90 – reference: 13129543 - Vision Res. 2003 Nov;43(24):2573-81 – reference: 14615590 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Nov 25;100(24):13940-5 – reference: 15078664 - Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):477-85 – reference: 18809924 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 30;105(39):15112-7 – reference: 16469187 - Vis Neurosci. 2005 Nov-Dec;22(6):769-87 – reference: 15876650 - J Neural Eng. 2005 Mar;2(1):S16-21 – reference: 3042323 - Doc Ophthalmol. 1988 Mar-Apr;68(3-4):257-71 – reference: 17271222 - Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2004;6:4172-3 – reference: 3808045 - Nature. 1987 Jan 29-Feb 4;325(6103):439-41 – reference: 9109761 - Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Apr;115(4):511-5 – reference: 16255687 - Clin Exp Optom. 2005 Sep;88(5):282-91 – reference: 19109509 - J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 24;28(52):14282-92 – reference: 14576452 - Mol Neurobiol. 2003 Oct;28(2):139-47 – reference: 9888437 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Jan;40(1):143-8 – reference: 18216234 - J Neurophysiol. 2008 Mar;99(3):1408-21 – reference: 18441371 - N Engl J Med. 2008 May 22;358(21):2231-9 – reference: 14638739 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Dec;44(12):5362-9 – reference: 19660665 - Prog Brain Res. 2009;175:317-32 – reference: 19675341 - N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 13;361(7):725-7 – reference: 18434523 - J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 23;28(17):4446-56 – reference: 16338109 - Hear Res. 2006 Jan;211(1-2):33-45 – reference: 16116447 - Nat Neurosci. 2005 Sep;8(9):1263-8 – reference: 16003900 - IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005 Jun;13(2):201-6 – reference: 17296890 - Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 Feb;125(2):151-8 – reference: 10396625 - Vision Res. 1999 Jul;39(15):2569-76 – reference: 18515576 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jun;49(6):2303-14 – reference: 14587604 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Oct;114(4 Pt 1):2049-57 – reference: 16870840 - J Neurophysiol. 2006 Nov;96(5):2792-6 – reference: 19608533 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Nov;50(11):5017-25 |
SSID | ssj0021120 |
Score | 2.1958735 |
Snippet | Since 2002, six blind patients have undergone implantation of an epiretinal 4 × 4 electrode array designed to directly stimulate the remaining cells of the... During multielectrode stimulation, interactions between electrodes have a significant influence on subjective brightness that can be either facilitatory or... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 549 |
SubjectTerms | Electrodes, Implanted Humans Light Microelectrodes Middle Aged Photic Stimulation Prosthesis Implantation Retina - physiology Retina - surgery Retinitis Pigmentosa - physiopathology Retinitis Pigmentosa - surgery Sensory Thresholds - physiology Visual Perception - physiology |
Title | Temporal Interactions during Paired-Electrode Stimulation in Two Retinal Prosthesis Subjects |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20720224 https://www.proquest.com/docview/849008766 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3053297 |
Volume | 52 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELZgkRAXxJuygHyAU5WyiR07PvLYsgu7y6WVekCK7MRRK3WTqkmLll_POHYe3S7icYla13Erz9fJzHjmG4TeEJ9QRcE7yY5o4lEpfU9wJTwaBRlRKhBBZAqczy_YyZR-mYWzLqpUV5dUapT8vLGu5H-kCmMgV1Ml-w-SbReFAXgN8oUrSBiufydjyyu1rEkf1rZEoWwqD1cStFnquT43qWGSXVy6Zl11duOPYmhKGI05ujK1H3NtyEnKjTKhmbJvtfbIOLZ6WKzm1VwuLy17k4HOdlFumuLKHlKKtclas92ylx0KPxRXuUva_6yLupCsi8nWeUBNzplN--5OrsYLG389LVwyQNrFX9twhdOwIXi_3HavGekbxpxaDoM9-FkdG1qO033dz8zp86LYliN4toSBbWq0S7F98S0eT8_O4snxbHIb3QnAtzBtLz6dfm29dN9yeba_qamWYPxdf-1dO2bPObmeY9szWiYP0H3nbeD3FjoP0S2dP0J3z10-xWP0vUEQ7iMIWwTh6wjCPQTBDRgQhB2CcIcg3CDoCZqOjycfTzzXb8NLKBWVR3lGOVfMTwKecZZxkYF6JgKeAlTpQGQp81kqGWEqUUmkMqlDDbemYHQLFSbkKTrIAQDPESaCRNKHSVRSmoCdKaMkY6AuCEtVqrMBGja7FyeOjN70RFnGtVPKeGz22rwxez1Ab9vZK0vC8pt5uBFEDFrSHH3JXBebMo6oqMkX2QA9s3JpFwqOeGAM2QHiOxJrJxgC9t1P8sW8JmInpq2K4C_-_LWH6F73Z3iJDqr1Rr8Ca7ZSr2v0_QLHbqsE |
linkProvider | Flying Publisher |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temporal+interactions+during+paired-electrode+stimulation+in+two+retinal+prosthesis+subjects&rft.jtitle=Investigative+ophthalmology+%26+visual+science&rft.au=Horsager%2C+Alan&rft.au=Boynton%2C+Geoffrey+M&rft.au=Greenberg%2C+Robert+J&rft.au=Fine%2C+Ione&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.issn=1552-5783&rft.eissn=1552-5783&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=549&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167%2Fiovs.10-5282&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1552-5783&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1552-5783&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1552-5783&client=summon |