Temporal Interactions during Paired-Electrode Stimulation in Two Retinal Prosthesis Subjects

Since 2002, six blind patients have undergone implantation of an epiretinal 4 × 4 electrode array designed to directly stimulate the remaining cells of the retina after severe photoreceptor degeneration due to retinitis pigmentosa. This study was conducted to investigate how the brightness of percep...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science Vol. 52; no. 1; pp. 549 - 557
Main Authors Horsager, Alan, Boynton, Geoffrey M., Greenberg, Robert J., Fine, Ione
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc 01.01.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Since 2002, six blind patients have undergone implantation of an epiretinal 4 × 4 electrode array designed to directly stimulate the remaining cells of the retina after severe photoreceptor degeneration due to retinitis pigmentosa. This study was conducted to investigate how the brightness of percepts is affected by pulse timing across electrodes in two of these patients. Subjects compared the perceived brightness of a standard stimulus (synchronous pulse trains presented across pairs of electrodes) to the perceived brightness of a test stimulus (pulse trains across the electrode pair phase shifted by 0.075, 0.375, 1.8, or 9 ms). The current amplitude necessary for each phase-shifted test stimulus to match the brightness of the standard was determined. Depending on the electrode pair, interactions between electrodes were either facilitatory (the perceived brightness produced by stimulating the pair of electrodes was greater than that produced by stimulating either electrode alone) or suppressive (the perceived brightness produced by stimulating the pair of electrodes was less than that produced by stimulating either electrode alone). The amount of interaction between electrodes decreased as a function of increased separation both in time (the phase-shift between pulse trains) and space (center-to-center distance between the electrode pair). For visual prostheses to represent visual scenes that are changing in both space and time requires the development of spatiotemporal models describing the effects of stimulation across multiple electrodes. During multielectrode stimulation, interactions between electrodes have a significant influence on subjective brightness that includes both facilitatory and suppressive effects, and these interactions can be described with a simple computational model. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00279500.).
AbstractList Since 2002, six blind patients have undergone implantation of an epiretinal 4 × 4 electrode array designed to directly stimulate the remaining cells of the retina after severe photoreceptor degeneration due to retinitis pigmentosa. This study was conducted to investigate how the brightness of percepts is affected by pulse timing across electrodes in two of these patients.PURPOSESince 2002, six blind patients have undergone implantation of an epiretinal 4 × 4 electrode array designed to directly stimulate the remaining cells of the retina after severe photoreceptor degeneration due to retinitis pigmentosa. This study was conducted to investigate how the brightness of percepts is affected by pulse timing across electrodes in two of these patients.Subjects compared the perceived brightness of a standard stimulus (synchronous pulse trains presented across pairs of electrodes) to the perceived brightness of a test stimulus (pulse trains across the electrode pair phase shifted by 0.075, 0.375, 1.8, or 9 ms). The current amplitude necessary for each phase-shifted test stimulus to match the brightness of the standard was determined.METHODSSubjects compared the perceived brightness of a standard stimulus (synchronous pulse trains presented across pairs of electrodes) to the perceived brightness of a test stimulus (pulse trains across the electrode pair phase shifted by 0.075, 0.375, 1.8, or 9 ms). The current amplitude necessary for each phase-shifted test stimulus to match the brightness of the standard was determined.Depending on the electrode pair, interactions between electrodes were either facilitatory (the perceived brightness produced by stimulating the pair of electrodes was greater than that produced by stimulating either electrode alone) or suppressive (the perceived brightness produced by stimulating the pair of electrodes was less than that produced by stimulating either electrode alone). The amount of interaction between electrodes decreased as a function of increased separation both in time (the phase-shift between pulse trains) and space (center-to-center distance between the electrode pair).RESULTSDepending on the electrode pair, interactions between electrodes were either facilitatory (the perceived brightness produced by stimulating the pair of electrodes was greater than that produced by stimulating either electrode alone) or suppressive (the perceived brightness produced by stimulating the pair of electrodes was less than that produced by stimulating either electrode alone). The amount of interaction between electrodes decreased as a function of increased separation both in time (the phase-shift between pulse trains) and space (center-to-center distance between the electrode pair).For visual prostheses to represent visual scenes that are changing in both space and time requires the development of spatiotemporal models describing the effects of stimulation across multiple electrodes. During multielectrode stimulation, interactions between electrodes have a significant influence on subjective brightness that includes both facilitatory and suppressive effects, and these interactions can be described with a simple computational model. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00279500.).CONCLUSIONSFor visual prostheses to represent visual scenes that are changing in both space and time requires the development of spatiotemporal models describing the effects of stimulation across multiple electrodes. During multielectrode stimulation, interactions between electrodes have a significant influence on subjective brightness that includes both facilitatory and suppressive effects, and these interactions can be described with a simple computational model. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00279500.).
During multielectrode stimulation, interactions between electrodes have a significant influence on subjective brightness that can be either facilitatory or suppressive. These interactions can be described in a simple computational model that may provide some insight into the underlying electrical and neural mechanisms responsible for spatiotemporal integration during multielectrode stimulation of the human retina.
Since 2002, six blind patients have undergone implantation of an epiretinal 4 × 4 electrode array designed to directly stimulate the remaining cells of the retina after severe photoreceptor degeneration due to retinitis pigmentosa. This study was conducted to investigate how the brightness of percepts is affected by pulse timing across electrodes in two of these patients. Subjects compared the perceived brightness of a standard stimulus (synchronous pulse trains presented across pairs of electrodes) to the perceived brightness of a test stimulus (pulse trains across the electrode pair phase shifted by 0.075, 0.375, 1.8, or 9 ms). The current amplitude necessary for each phase-shifted test stimulus to match the brightness of the standard was determined. Depending on the electrode pair, interactions between electrodes were either facilitatory (the perceived brightness produced by stimulating the pair of electrodes was greater than that produced by stimulating either electrode alone) or suppressive (the perceived brightness produced by stimulating the pair of electrodes was less than that produced by stimulating either electrode alone). The amount of interaction between electrodes decreased as a function of increased separation both in time (the phase-shift between pulse trains) and space (center-to-center distance between the electrode pair). For visual prostheses to represent visual scenes that are changing in both space and time requires the development of spatiotemporal models describing the effects of stimulation across multiple electrodes. During multielectrode stimulation, interactions between electrodes have a significant influence on subjective brightness that includes both facilitatory and suppressive effects, and these interactions can be described with a simple computational model. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00279500.).
Author Fine, Ione
Boynton, Geoffrey M.
Greenberg, Robert J.
Horsager, Alan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Alan
  surname: Horsager
  fullname: Horsager, Alan
  organization: From the Neuroscience Graduate Program and the 2Institute for Genetic Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Geoffrey M.
  surname: Boynton
  fullname: Boynton, Geoffrey M.
  organization: the Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Robert J.
  surname: Greenberg
  fullname: Greenberg, Robert J.
  organization: Second Sight Medical Products, Inc., Sylmar, California
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ione
  surname: Fine
  fullname: Fine, Ione
  organization: the Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20720224$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptUctKxDAUDaL43rmW7txYTdI2aTeCiC8YUHTcCSFNb2cibTImqeLfm-ooKq5uLjkP7jlbaNVYAwjtEXxECOPH2r74I4LTgpZ0BW2SoqBpwcts9cd7A215_4QxJYTidbRBMaeY0nwTPU6hX1gnu-TaBHBSBW2NT5rBaTNLbqV20KTnHajgbAPJfdD90MkRlGiTTF9tcgdBm8i_ddaHOXjtk_uhfooMv4PWWtl52F3ObfRwcT49u0onN5fXZ6eTVOV5FdKctznnNSOK8pazlldtxbKswjzLa6BV2zDCGskyVqtalXUroYBIbQqSV3Whsm108qm7GOoeGgUmxIvEwuleujdhpRa_f4yei5l9ERkuMlrxKHCwFHD2eQAfRK-9gq6TBuzgRZlXGJecsYjc_2n17fGVaATQT4CKeXgHrVA6fAQWnXUnCBZjbWKsbVzG2iLp8A_pS_df-DtnY5zF
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2560_10_3_036002
crossref_primary_10_1038_mt_2011_69
crossref_primary_10_1097_WCO_0b013e32834f02c3
crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_ac7615
crossref_primary_10_1586_17434440_2014_862494
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tibtech_2013_07_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brs_2022_03_008
crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2560_10_5_056011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neulet_2012_02_001
crossref_primary_10_1186_1743_0003_8_44
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_45416_4
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0228861
crossref_primary_10_1126_scitranslmed_aac4877
crossref_primary_10_1167_iovs_64_15_5
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2017_00620
crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_aba560
crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2014_0208
crossref_primary_10_1167_tvst_9_8_25
crossref_primary_10_1039_C4FD00040D
crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_abecf1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinph_2019_11_029
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00417_015_3121_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_preteyeres_2015_09_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2015_04_012
crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_ac7326
crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2560_8_4_046016
crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2560_8_6_066007
crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_ad31c4
crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_aab1b8
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1167/iovs.10-5282
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1552-5783
EndPage 557
ExternalDocumentID PMC3053297
20720224
10_1167_iovs_10_5282
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: EY012893
– fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: EY014645
– fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: P30 EY001730
– fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 EY014645
– fundername: National Institutes of Health
  grantid: NEI EY012893 EY014645
GroupedDBID ---
18M
2WC
34G
39C
5GY
5RE
AAYXX
ACGFO
ACNCT
ADBBV
AENEX
AFOSN
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
N9A
OK1
P2P
RPM
SJN
TR2
TRV
W8F
WH7
WOQ
WOW
.55
.GJ
53G
AFFNX
AI.
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
VH1
X7M
ZGI
ZXP
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-47f477b61c27f76f79f963390734be29fd616da636bcbc8bfae5ec44d5149b5c3
ISSN 1552-5783
0146-0404
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:31:22 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 19:57:33 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:00:04 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:53:18 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:53 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c449t-47f477b61c27f76f79f963390734be29fd616da636bcbc8bfae5ec44d5149b5c3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3053297
PMID 20720224
PQID 849008766
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3053297
proquest_miscellaneous_849008766
pubmed_primary_20720224
crossref_citationtrail_10_1167_iovs_10_5282
crossref_primary_10_1167_iovs_10_5282
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2011-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2011-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2011
  text: 2011-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Investigative ophthalmology & visual science
PublicationTitleAlternate Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
PublicationYear 2011
Publisher Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc
References 11800459 - Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1314-29
18515576 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jun;49(6):2303-14
19741248 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Feb;51(2):1223-33
14638739 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Dec;44(12):5362-9
18774912 - Hum Gene Ther. 2008 Oct;19(10):979-90
9109761 - Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Apr;115(4):511-5
11853755 - Vision Res. 2002 Feb;42(4):393-9
18562624 - J Neurosci. 2008 Jun 18;28(25):6526-36
18836071 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 14;105(41):16009-14
13129543 - Vision Res. 2003 Nov;43(24):2573-81
6575638 - Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1983;405:123-36
19608533 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Nov;50(11):5017-25
18216234 - J Neurophysiol. 2008 Mar;99(3):1408-21
16870840 - J Neurophysiol. 2006 Nov;96(5):2792-6
18434523 - J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 23;28(17):4446-56
18809924 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 30;105(39):15112-7
16236780 - J Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;95(2):970-8
16116447 - Nat Neurosci. 2005 Sep;8(9):1263-8
16600853 - Neuron. 2006 Apr 6;50(1):23-33
13441853 - Psychol Rev. 1957 May;64(3):153-81
16469187 - Vis Neurosci. 2005 Nov-Dec;22(6):769-87
18441371 - N Engl J Med. 2008 May 22;358(21):2231-9
14615590 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Nov 25;100(24):13940-5
17521567 - Neuron. 2007 May 24;54(4):535-45
8263821 - J Rehabil Res Dev. 1993;30(1):110-6
17362868 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 May;143(5):820-827
16338109 - Hear Res. 2006 Jan;211(1-2):33-45
14587604 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Oct;114(4 Pt 1):2049-57
15558062 - Nat Neurosci. 2004 Dec;7(12):1381-6
17059359 - Annu Rev Physiol. 2007;69:271-90
16255687 - Clin Exp Optom. 2005 Sep;88(5):282-91
15051882 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 6;101(14):5170-3
17483470 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 8;104(19):8143-8
16003900 - IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005 Jun;13(2):201-6
19660665 - Prog Brain Res. 2009;175:317-32
10396625 - Vision Res. 1999 Jul;39(15):2569-76
6702974 - Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Mar;97(3):357-65
19163027 - Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:1785-8
15876650 - J Neural Eng. 2005 Mar;2(1):S16-21
19583479 - Hum Gene Ther. 2009 Sep;20(9):999-1004
14576452 - Mol Neurobiol. 2003 Oct;28(2):139-47
9888437 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Jan;40(1):143-8
15078664 - Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):477-85
3808045 - Nature. 1987 Jan 29-Feb 4;325(6103):439-41
12948604 - Hear Res. 2003 Aug;182(1-2):77-87
19675341 - N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 13;361(7):725-7
19109509 - J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 24;28(52):14282-92
5500775 - J Physiol. 1970 Sep;210(1):165-86
18432197 - Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jun;11(6):667-75
19098313 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Apr;50(4):1483-91
17296890 - Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 Feb;125(2):151-8
17271222 - Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2004;6:4172-3
3042323 - Doc Ophthalmol. 1988 Mar-Apr;68(3-4):257-71
References_xml – reference: 18836071 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 14;105(41):16009-14
– reference: 11800459 - Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1314-29
– reference: 18774912 - Hum Gene Ther. 2008 Oct;19(10):979-90
– reference: 17521567 - Neuron. 2007 May 24;54(4):535-45
– reference: 11853755 - Vision Res. 2002 Feb;42(4):393-9
– reference: 13441853 - Psychol Rev. 1957 May;64(3):153-81
– reference: 5500775 - J Physiol. 1970 Sep;210(1):165-86
– reference: 6575638 - Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1983;405:123-36
– reference: 19583479 - Hum Gene Ther. 2009 Sep;20(9):999-1004
– reference: 6702974 - Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Mar;97(3):357-65
– reference: 15051882 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 6;101(14):5170-3
– reference: 12948604 - Hear Res. 2003 Aug;182(1-2):77-87
– reference: 18432197 - Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jun;11(6):667-75
– reference: 19098313 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Apr;50(4):1483-91
– reference: 8263821 - J Rehabil Res Dev. 1993;30(1):110-6
– reference: 19741248 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Feb;51(2):1223-33
– reference: 15558062 - Nat Neurosci. 2004 Dec;7(12):1381-6
– reference: 17483470 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 8;104(19):8143-8
– reference: 17362868 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 May;143(5):820-827
– reference: 19163027 - Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:1785-8
– reference: 16600853 - Neuron. 2006 Apr 6;50(1):23-33
– reference: 18562624 - J Neurosci. 2008 Jun 18;28(25):6526-36
– reference: 16236780 - J Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;95(2):970-8
– reference: 17059359 - Annu Rev Physiol. 2007;69:271-90
– reference: 13129543 - Vision Res. 2003 Nov;43(24):2573-81
– reference: 14615590 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Nov 25;100(24):13940-5
– reference: 15078664 - Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):477-85
– reference: 18809924 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 30;105(39):15112-7
– reference: 16469187 - Vis Neurosci. 2005 Nov-Dec;22(6):769-87
– reference: 15876650 - J Neural Eng. 2005 Mar;2(1):S16-21
– reference: 3042323 - Doc Ophthalmol. 1988 Mar-Apr;68(3-4):257-71
– reference: 17271222 - Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2004;6:4172-3
– reference: 3808045 - Nature. 1987 Jan 29-Feb 4;325(6103):439-41
– reference: 9109761 - Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Apr;115(4):511-5
– reference: 16255687 - Clin Exp Optom. 2005 Sep;88(5):282-91
– reference: 19109509 - J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 24;28(52):14282-92
– reference: 14576452 - Mol Neurobiol. 2003 Oct;28(2):139-47
– reference: 9888437 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Jan;40(1):143-8
– reference: 18216234 - J Neurophysiol. 2008 Mar;99(3):1408-21
– reference: 18441371 - N Engl J Med. 2008 May 22;358(21):2231-9
– reference: 14638739 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Dec;44(12):5362-9
– reference: 19660665 - Prog Brain Res. 2009;175:317-32
– reference: 19675341 - N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 13;361(7):725-7
– reference: 18434523 - J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 23;28(17):4446-56
– reference: 16338109 - Hear Res. 2006 Jan;211(1-2):33-45
– reference: 16116447 - Nat Neurosci. 2005 Sep;8(9):1263-8
– reference: 16003900 - IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005 Jun;13(2):201-6
– reference: 17296890 - Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 Feb;125(2):151-8
– reference: 10396625 - Vision Res. 1999 Jul;39(15):2569-76
– reference: 18515576 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jun;49(6):2303-14
– reference: 14587604 - J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Oct;114(4 Pt 1):2049-57
– reference: 16870840 - J Neurophysiol. 2006 Nov;96(5):2792-6
– reference: 19608533 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Nov;50(11):5017-25
SSID ssj0021120
Score 2.1958735
Snippet Since 2002, six blind patients have undergone implantation of an epiretinal 4 × 4 electrode array designed to directly stimulate the remaining cells of the...
During multielectrode stimulation, interactions between electrodes have a significant influence on subjective brightness that can be either facilitatory or...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 549
SubjectTerms Electrodes, Implanted
Humans
Light
Microelectrodes
Middle Aged
Photic Stimulation
Prosthesis Implantation
Retina - physiology
Retina - surgery
Retinitis Pigmentosa - physiopathology
Retinitis Pigmentosa - surgery
Sensory Thresholds - physiology
Visual Perception - physiology
Title Temporal Interactions during Paired-Electrode Stimulation in Two Retinal Prosthesis Subjects
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20720224
https://www.proquest.com/docview/849008766
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3053297
Volume 52
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELZgkRAXxJuygHyAU5WyiR07PvLYsgu7y6WVekCK7MRRK3WTqkmLll_POHYe3S7icYla13Erz9fJzHjmG4TeEJ9QRcE7yY5o4lEpfU9wJTwaBRlRKhBBZAqczy_YyZR-mYWzLqpUV5dUapT8vLGu5H-kCmMgV1Ml-w-SbReFAXgN8oUrSBiufydjyyu1rEkf1rZEoWwqD1cStFnquT43qWGSXVy6Zl11duOPYmhKGI05ujK1H3NtyEnKjTKhmbJvtfbIOLZ6WKzm1VwuLy17k4HOdlFumuLKHlKKtclas92ylx0KPxRXuUva_6yLupCsi8nWeUBNzplN--5OrsYLG389LVwyQNrFX9twhdOwIXi_3HavGekbxpxaDoM9-FkdG1qO033dz8zp86LYliN4toSBbWq0S7F98S0eT8_O4snxbHIb3QnAtzBtLz6dfm29dN9yeba_qamWYPxdf-1dO2bPObmeY9szWiYP0H3nbeD3FjoP0S2dP0J3z10-xWP0vUEQ7iMIWwTh6wjCPQTBDRgQhB2CcIcg3CDoCZqOjycfTzzXb8NLKBWVR3lGOVfMTwKecZZxkYF6JgKeAlTpQGQp81kqGWEqUUmkMqlDDbemYHQLFSbkKTrIAQDPESaCRNKHSVRSmoCdKaMkY6AuCEtVqrMBGja7FyeOjN70RFnGtVPKeGz22rwxez1Ab9vZK0vC8pt5uBFEDFrSHH3JXBebMo6oqMkX2QA9s3JpFwqOeGAM2QHiOxJrJxgC9t1P8sW8JmInpq2K4C_-_LWH6F73Z3iJDqr1Rr8Ca7ZSr2v0_QLHbqsE
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temporal+interactions+during+paired-electrode+stimulation+in+two+retinal+prosthesis+subjects&rft.jtitle=Investigative+ophthalmology+%26+visual+science&rft.au=Horsager%2C+Alan&rft.au=Boynton%2C+Geoffrey+M&rft.au=Greenberg%2C+Robert+J&rft.au=Fine%2C+Ione&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.issn=1552-5783&rft.eissn=1552-5783&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=549&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167%2Fiovs.10-5282&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1552-5783&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1552-5783&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1552-5783&client=summon