Bitter-blockers as a taste masking strategy: A systematic review towards their utility in pharmaceuticals
[Display omitted] Acceptable palatability of an oral dosage form is crucial to patient compliance. Excipients can be utilised within a formulation to mask the bitterness of a drug. One such category is the bitter-blockers. This term is used inconsistently within the literature and has historically b...
Saved in:
Published in | European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics Vol. 158; pp. 35 - 51 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
01.01.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | [Display omitted]
Acceptable palatability of an oral dosage form is crucial to patient compliance. Excipients can be utilised within a formulation to mask the bitterness of a drug. One such category is the bitter-blockers. This term is used inconsistently within the literature and has historically been used to describe any additive which alters the taste of an unpleasant compound. This review defines a bitter-blocker as a compound which interacts with the molecular pathway of bitterness at a taste-cell level and compiles data obtained from publication screening of such compounds. Here, a novel scoring system is created to assess their potential utility in a medicinal product using factors such as usability, safety, efficacy and quality of evidence to understand their taste-masking ability. Sodium acetate, sodium gluconate and adenosine 5′monophophate each have a good usability and safety profile and are generally regarded as safe and have shown evidence of bitter-blocking in human sensory panels. These compounds could offer a much needed option to taste-mask particularly aversive medicines where traditional methods alone are insufficient. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0939-6411 1873-3441 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.10.017 |