Comparison of tooth substance loss and angle deviation in access cavity preparation using guided endodontics and conventional method in calcified canals - An in vitro study
Abstract Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of access cavity preparation using guided endodontics (GE) and conventional technique (CT) in calcified canals. Subjects and Methods: Twenty teeth with calcification up to middle third were collected after scanning through RadioVisioGraphy (RV...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of conservative dentistry Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 90 - 95 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
India
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
01.01.2025
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd |
| Edition | 2 |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Abstract
Aims:
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of access cavity preparation using guided endodontics (GE) and conventional technique (CT) in calcified canals.
Subjects and Methods:
Twenty teeth with calcification up to middle third were collected after scanning through RadioVisioGraphy (RVG). Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was done and samples were randomly divided into two groups of ten samples each on the basis of method of access cavity preparation. Group 1: Access cavity was prepared by CT, Group 2: Access cavity was prepared by GE. 3D template and corresponding guide drill were made for group 2 samples after performing optical surface scans. After access cavity preparation, postoperative CBCT scanning was performed for all samples. The amount of tooth structure loss and angle deviation were calculated using Sidexis Software.
Statistical Analysis Used:
The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 22. A t-test compared tooth structure loss and angle deviation between groups, and a one-way ANOVA calculated tooth structure loss in multiple directions for both groups (P < 0.001).
Results:
Our study found that the mean tooth volume loss (17.19 mm3 ± 06.11 standard deviation [SD]) and angle deviation (4.82° ±01.66 SD) in GE was significantly less (P < 0.001) as compared to mean tooth structure loss (38.85 mm3 ± 19.07 SD) and angle deviation (13.16° ±2.34 SD) by CT.
Conclusion:
GE is more accurate and conservative than CT in management of calcified canals. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | AbstractAims:This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of access cavity preparation using guided endodontics (GE) and conventional technique (CT) in calcified canals.Subjects and Methods:Twenty teeth with calcification up to middle third were collected after scanning through RadioVisioGraphy (RVG). Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was done and samples were randomly divided into two groups of ten samples each on the basis of method of access cavity preparation. Group 1: Access cavity was prepared by CT, Group 2: Access cavity was prepared by GE. 3D template and corresponding guide drill were made for group 2 samples after performing optical surface scans. After access cavity preparation, postoperative CBCT scanning was performed for all samples. The amount of tooth structure loss and angle deviation were calculated using Sidexis Software.Statistical Analysis Used:The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 22. A t-test compared tooth structure loss and angle deviation between groups, and a one-way ANOVA calculated tooth structure loss in multiple directions for both groups (P < 0.001).Results:Our study found that the mean tooth volume loss (17.19 mm3 ± 06.11 standard deviation [SD]) and angle deviation (4.82° ±01.66 SD) in GE was significantly less (P < 0.001) as compared to mean tooth structure loss (38.85 mm3 ± 19.07 SD) and angle deviation (13.16° ±2.34 SD) by CT.Conclusion:GE is more accurate and conservative than CT in management of calcified canals. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of access cavity preparation using guided endodontics (GE) and conventional technique (CT) in calcified canals.AimsThis study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of access cavity preparation using guided endodontics (GE) and conventional technique (CT) in calcified canals.Twenty teeth with calcification up to middle third were collected after scanning through RadioVisioGraphy (RVG). Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was done and samples were randomly divided into two groups of ten samples each on the basis of method of access cavity preparation. Group 1: Access cavity was prepared by CT, Group 2: Access cavity was prepared by GE. 3D template and corresponding guide drill were made for group 2 samples after performing optical surface scans. After access cavity preparation, postoperative CBCT scanning was performed for all samples. The amount of tooth structure loss and angle deviation were calculated using Sidexis Software.Subjects and MethodsTwenty teeth with calcification up to middle third were collected after scanning through RadioVisioGraphy (RVG). Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was done and samples were randomly divided into two groups of ten samples each on the basis of method of access cavity preparation. Group 1: Access cavity was prepared by CT, Group 2: Access cavity was prepared by GE. 3D template and corresponding guide drill were made for group 2 samples after performing optical surface scans. After access cavity preparation, postoperative CBCT scanning was performed for all samples. The amount of tooth structure loss and angle deviation were calculated using Sidexis Software.The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 22. A t-test compared tooth structure loss and angle deviation between groups, and a one-way ANOVA calculated tooth structure loss in multiple directions for both groups (P < 0.001).Statistical Analysis UsedThe data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 22. A t-test compared tooth structure loss and angle deviation between groups, and a one-way ANOVA calculated tooth structure loss in multiple directions for both groups (P < 0.001).Our study found that the mean tooth volume loss (17.19 mm3 ± 06.11 standard deviation [SD]) and angle deviation (4.82° ±01.66 SD) in GE was significantly less (P < 0.001) as compared to mean tooth structure loss (38.85 mm3 ± 19.07 SD) and angle deviation (13.16° ±2.34 SD) by CT.ResultsOur study found that the mean tooth volume loss (17.19 mm3 ± 06.11 standard deviation [SD]) and angle deviation (4.82° ±01.66 SD) in GE was significantly less (P < 0.001) as compared to mean tooth structure loss (38.85 mm3 ± 19.07 SD) and angle deviation (13.16° ±2.34 SD) by CT.GE is more accurate and conservative than CT in management of calcified canals.ConclusionGE is more accurate and conservative than CT in management of calcified canals. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of access cavity preparation using guided endodontics (GE) and conventional technique (CT) in calcified canals. Twenty teeth with calcification up to middle third were collected after scanning through RadioVisioGraphy (RVG). Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was done and samples were randomly divided into two groups of ten samples each on the basis of method of access cavity preparation. Group 1: Access cavity was prepared by CT, Group 2: Access cavity was prepared by GE. 3D template and corresponding guide drill were made for group 2 samples after performing optical surface scans. After access cavity preparation, postoperative CBCT scanning was performed for all samples. The amount of tooth structure loss and angle deviation were calculated using Sidexis Software. Our study found that the mean tooth volume loss (17.19 mm[sup.3] ± 06.11 standard deviation [SD]) and angle deviation (4.82° ±01.66 SD) in GE was significantly less (P < 0.001) as compared to mean tooth structure loss (38.85 mm[sup.3] ± 19.07 SD) and angle deviation (13.16° ±2.34 SD) by CT. GE is more accurate and conservative than CT in management of calcified canals. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of access cavity preparation using guided endodontics (GE) and conventional technique (CT) in calcified canals. Twenty teeth with calcification up to middle third were collected after scanning through RadioVisioGraphy (RVG). Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was done and samples were randomly divided into two groups of ten samples each on the basis of method of access cavity preparation. Group 1: Access cavity was prepared by CT, Group 2: Access cavity was prepared by GE. 3D template and corresponding guide drill were made for group 2 samples after performing optical surface scans. After access cavity preparation, postoperative CBCT scanning was performed for all samples. The amount of tooth structure loss and angle deviation were calculated using Sidexis Software. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 22. A t-test compared tooth structure loss and angle deviation between groups, and a one-way ANOVA calculated tooth structure loss in multiple directions for both groups (P < 0.001). Our study found that the mean tooth volume loss (17.19 mm ± 06.11 standard deviation [SD]) and angle deviation (4.82° ±01.66 SD) in GE was significantly less (P < 0.001) as compared to mean tooth structure loss (38.85 mm ± 19.07 SD) and angle deviation (13.16° ±2.34 SD) by CT. GE is more accurate and conservative than CT in management of calcified canals. Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of access cavity preparation using guided endodontics (GE) and conventional technique (CT) in calcified canals. Subjects and Methods: Twenty teeth with calcification up to middle third were collected after scanning through RadioVisioGraphy (RVG). Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was done and samples were randomly divided into two groups of ten samples each on the basis of method of access cavity preparation. Group 1: Access cavity was prepared by CT, Group 2: Access cavity was prepared by GE. 3D template and corresponding guide drill were made for group 2 samples after performing optical surface scans. After access cavity preparation, postoperative CBCT scanning was performed for all samples. The amount of tooth structure loss and angle deviation were calculated using Sidexis Software. Statistical Analysis Used: The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 22. A t-test compared tooth structure loss and angle deviation between groups, and a one-way ANOVA calculated tooth structure loss in multiple directions for both groups (P < 0.001). Results: Our study found that the mean tooth volume loss (17.19 mm[sup.3] ± 06.11 standard deviation [SD]) and angle deviation (4.82° ±01.66 SD) in GE was significantly less (P < 0.001) as compared to mean tooth structure loss (38.85 mm[sup.3] ± 19.07 SD) and angle deviation (13.16° ±2.34 SD) by CT. Conclusion: GE is more accurate and conservative than CT in management of calcified canals. Keywords: 3D template, calcified canals, cone-beam computed tomography, guided endodontics, optical surface scans Abstract Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of access cavity preparation using guided endodontics (GE) and conventional technique (CT) in calcified canals. Subjects and Methods: Twenty teeth with calcification up to middle third were collected after scanning through RadioVisioGraphy (RVG). Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was done and samples were randomly divided into two groups of ten samples each on the basis of method of access cavity preparation. Group 1: Access cavity was prepared by CT, Group 2: Access cavity was prepared by GE. 3D template and corresponding guide drill were made for group 2 samples after performing optical surface scans. After access cavity preparation, postoperative CBCT scanning was performed for all samples. The amount of tooth structure loss and angle deviation were calculated using Sidexis Software. Statistical Analysis Used: The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 22. A t-test compared tooth structure loss and angle deviation between groups, and a one-way ANOVA calculated tooth structure loss in multiple directions for both groups (P < 0.001). Results: Our study found that the mean tooth volume loss (17.19 mm3 ± 06.11 standard deviation [SD]) and angle deviation (4.82° ±01.66 SD) in GE was significantly less (P < 0.001) as compared to mean tooth structure loss (38.85 mm3 ± 19.07 SD) and angle deviation (13.16° ±2.34 SD) by CT. Conclusion: GE is more accurate and conservative than CT in management of calcified canals. |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Bansal, Rajinder Kumar Garg, Reeshu Bansal, Dolphi Bansal, Manu |
| AuthorAffiliation | Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Guru Nanak Dev Dental College and Research Institute, Sunam, Punjab, India |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Guru Nanak Dev Dental College and Research Institute, Sunam, Punjab, India |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Rajinder Kumar surname: Bansal fullname: Bansal, Rajinder Kumar email: drrajinderbansal@hotmail.com – sequence: 2 givenname: Manu surname: Bansal fullname: Bansal, Manu – sequence: 3 givenname: Reeshu surname: Garg fullname: Garg, Reeshu – sequence: 4 givenname: Dolphi surname: Bansal fullname: Bansal, Dolphi |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39974687$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp1kl9v0zAUxSM0xMbYO0_IEtLES0sSO4n9hKoy_mkSL_BsufZNa-bYxU5a9TvxIblZt9IiUJQ4yv2d4-j4PM_OfPCQZS-LfMqKnL79Mn9_Mx0fsqJUluxJdlGKKp-wJudnh_eiPs-uUrKLvKpqysuqfJadUyEaVvPmIvs1D91aRZuCJ6ElfQj9iqRhkXrlNRAXUiLKG7yXDoiBjVW9RdZ6orQGnGq1sf2OrCOgz344JOuXZDlYA4aAN8EE31u9d9LBb8CPnHKkg34VzOimldO2tSjQCieJTMjsfht0j4GkfjC7F9nTFkdw9bBeZt8_3Hybf5rcfv34eT67nWjGRJpwI6BdVBXnRVsvGs24rhk3BhrKlcq54aJqy4ZBbYSoKa2ZMaXgBRN1I0DX9DJ7t_ddD4sOjMbfjcrJdbSdijsZlJWnE29Xchk2sig4rWgl0OHNg0MMPwdIvexs0uCc8hCGJGmB6Td4UCWir_9Cf4QhjhFIWhaMMc7K-g-1VA6k9W3AjfVoKmdoQquCUo7U9B8UXgY6i8FDa_H7ieD6SLAC5fpVCm4Yjyedgq-OIzlk8dgkBPI9oCN2JkJ7QIpcjn2V91U96itKZnvJNrgeYrpzwxaiRPs7H7b_1UmRy8fW0t_NmPUp |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.joen.2018.11.006 10.3390/jpm12091516 10.4103/jcd.jcd_506_22 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1989.tb00509.x 10.1186/s12903-023-03436-7 10.4103/JCD.JCD_21_20 10.1111/j.1754-4505.1994.tb01113.x 10.1111/clr.13435 10.1111/iej.13685 10.4103/0976-237X.169840 10.1111/clr.13578 10.1016/0030-4220(68)90165-5 10.1007/s00784-024-05603-8 10.1016/j.joen.2020.09.008 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00683.2 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104487 10.4103/japtr.japtr_242_22 10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.008 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.005 10.4103/JCD.JCD_30_20 10.4103/jcd.jcd_3_23 10.1016/j.joen.2020.07.032 10.1016/j.joen.2020.10.025 10.1111/clr.14043 10.4103/JCD.JCD_190_19 10.3390/ijerph192113900 10.4103/0970-9290.70806 10.1016/j.joen.2020.09.019 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2025 Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Copyright: © 2025 Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. COPYRIGHT 2025 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd. 2025. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. Copyright: © 2025 Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics 2025 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025 Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics – notice: Copyright: © 2025 Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. – notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd. – notice: 2025. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: Copyright: © 2025 Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics 2025 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM K9. 7X8 5PM |
| DOI | 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_533_24 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Dentistry |
| EISSN | 2950-4708 |
| Edition | 2 |
| EndPage | 95 |
| ExternalDocumentID | PMC11835359 A823351338 39974687 10_4103_JCDE_JCDE_533_24 JCDE-28-90 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | United States Connecticut |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Connecticut – name: United States |
| GroupedDBID | 7X7 8FI 8FJ 8G5 ABUWG AFKRA ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GNUQQ GUQSH HCIFZ HMCUK M2O M7P OVD PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY RPM TEORI UKHRP AAYXX CITATION NPM 29K 2WC 34H 5VS 8FE 8FH ABJNI ACGFS ACPRK ADBBV AHMBA ALIPV AOIJS BAWUL BPHCQ BVXVI D-I DIK E3Z EBS EJD F5P FRP GX1 HYE IAO IEA IHR IHW INH INR ITC IVC KQ8 LK8 O5R O5S OBODZ OK1 P2P PQQKQ PROAC RMW RNS TR2 K9. 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c449s-8d9efb55881f6b7c48c648dde738aa08d895f274e6d9963364dd298149679ec63 |
| ISSN | 2950-4716 0972-0707 2950-4708 |
| IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:28:34 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 01:41:22 EDT 2025 Sun Jul 27 07:11:00 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:59:15 EDT 2025 Sat Mar 08 18:51:05 EST 2025 Thu May 22 21:23:28 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:57:22 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:28:12 EDT 2025 Wed Jul 16 08:20:49 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | cone-beam computed tomography calcified canals guided endodontics 3D template optical surface scans |
| Language | English |
| License | Copyright: © 2025 Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c449s-8d9efb55881f6b7c48c648dde738aa08d895f274e6d9963364dd298149679ec63 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11835359 |
| PMID | 39974687 |
| PQID | 3214448426 |
| PQPubID | 226488 |
| PageCount | 6 |
| ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11835359 proquest_miscellaneous_3168777082 proquest_journals_3214448426 gale_infotracmisc_A823351338 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A823351338 gale_healthsolutions_A823351338 pubmed_primary_39974687 crossref_primary_10_4103_JCDE_JCDE_533_24 wolterskluwer_medknow_10_4103_JCDE_JCDE_533_24_90_Comparis |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20250100 2025-01-00 2025-Jan 20250101 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-01-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2025 text: 20250100 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | India |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: India – name: Mumbai |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of conservative dentistry |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Conserv Dent Endod |
| PublicationYear | 2025 |
| Publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow – name: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd – name: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd |
| References | Dedania (R24-20250114) 2020; 23 Kakade (R12-20250114) 2015; 6 de Cunha (R16-20250114) 2009; 1 Taheri Otaghsara (R28-20250114) 2023; 132 Nayak (R10-20250114) 2010; 21 Kaewsiri (R31-20250114) 2019; 30 Hildebrand (R17-20250114) 2023; 23 Yotpibulwong (R29-20250114) 2023; 34 Symons (R13-20250114) 1994; 14 Kostunov (R18-20250114) 2021; 47 Kasabwala (R1-20250114) 2020; 5 Arun (R21-20250114) 2022; 13 Pettiette (R14-20250114) 2013; 39 Sudha (R32-20250114) 2023; 26 Plotino (R5-20250114) 2007; 33 Iandolo (R20-20250114) 2023; 15 Ali (R34-20250114) 2019; 22 Chaniotis (R4-20250114) 2022; 55 Kvinnsland (R15-20250114) 1989; 22 Vasudevan (R7-20250114) 2023; 26 Loureiro (R27-20250114) 2020; 46 Dianat (R6-20250114) 2021; 47 Kumar (R2-20250114) 2018; 11 Jain (R3-20250114) 2021; 25 Ribeiro (R22-20250114) 2022; 12 Kulinkovych-Levchuk (R8-20250114) 2022; 19 Panithini (R23-20250114) 2023; 26 Rohra (R25-20250114) 2023; 26 Hegde (R33-20250114) 2019; 22 Sayegh (R11-20250114) 2010; 25 Jain (R26-20250114) 2020; 46 Varga (R30-20250114) 2020; 31 Connert (R9-20250114) 2019; 45 Huth (R19-20250114) 2024; 28 |
| References_xml | – volume: 45 start-page: 327 year: 2019 ident: R9-20250114 article-title: Guided endodontics versus conventional access cavity preparation: A comparative study on substance loss using 3-dimensional-printed teeth publication-title: J Endod doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.11.006 – volume: 12 start-page: 1516 year: 2022 ident: R22-20250114 article-title: Guided endodontics: Static versus dynamic computer-aided techniques-a literature review publication-title: J Pers Med doi: 10.3390/jpm12091516 – volume: 1 start-page: 64 year: 2009 ident: R16-20250114 article-title: Pulp canal obliteration subsequent to trauma: Perforation management with MTA followed by canal localization and obturation publication-title: Braz J Dent Traumatol – volume: 26 start-page: 221 year: 2023 ident: R25-20250114 article-title: Evaluation of volumetric substance loss and precision in targeted endodontic re-treatment with guided versus conventional access cavity preparations: An in vitro study publication-title: J Conserv Dent – volume: 26 start-page: 113 year: 2023 ident: R23-20250114 article-title: Real-time guided endodontics: A case report of maxillary central incisor with calcific metamorphosis publication-title: J Conserv Dent Endod doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_506_22 – volume: 22 start-page: 75 year: 1989 ident: R15-20250114 article-title: A clinical and roentgenological study of 55 cases of root perforation publication-title: Int Endod J doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1989.tb00509.x – volume: 23 start-page: 713 year: 2023 ident: R17-20250114 article-title: Guided endodontics versus conventional access cavity preparation: An ex vivo comparative study of substance loss publication-title: BMC Oral Health doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03436-7 – volume: 15 start-page: 48 year: 2023 ident: R20-20250114 article-title: Calcifications detection and management in the obliterated endodontic space publication-title: J Osseointegr – volume: 22 start-page: 607 year: 2019 ident: R33-20250114 article-title: Guided endodontic therapy: Management of pulp canal obliteration in the maxillary central incisor publication-title: J Conserv Dent doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_21_20 – volume: 14 start-page: 103 year: 1994 ident: R13-20250114 article-title: Pulpal obliteration related to long-term glucocorticosteroid medication publication-title: Spec Care Dentist doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.1994.tb01113.x – volume: 30 start-page: 505 year: 2019 ident: R31-20250114 article-title: The accuracy of static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial publication-title: Clin Oral Implants Res doi: 10.1111/clr.13435 – volume: 55 start-page: 656 issue: Suppl 3 year: 2022 ident: R4-20250114 article-title: Present status and future directions: Management of curved and calcified root canals publication-title: Int Endod J doi: 10.1111/iej.13685 – volume: 6 start-page: 552 year: 2015 ident: R12-20250114 article-title: Oral manifestations of secondary hyperparathyroidism: A case report publication-title: Contemp Clin Dent doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.169840 – volume: 5 start-page: 10047 year: 2020 ident: R1-20250114 article-title: PCO: A review publication-title: J Oper Dent Endod – volume: 31 start-page: 417 year: 2020 ident: R30-20250114 article-title: Guidance means accuracy: A randomized clinical trial on freehand versus guided dental implantation publication-title: Clin Oral Implants Res doi: 10.1111/clr.13578 – volume: 25 start-page: 3921 year: 2021 ident: R3-20250114 article-title: Generation and evaluation for the effectiveness of ACCU DIRECT SCALE developed for access cavity preparation using CBCT analysis for guided endodontic procedure in calcified canals and in comparison with conventional method publication-title: Ann Rom Soc Cell Biol – volume: 26 start-page: 241 year: 2023 ident: R32-20250114 article-title: Guidodontics: A global positioning system (GPS) to surgical endodontics-a case series publication-title: J Conserv Dent Endod – volume: 25 start-page: 873 year: 2010 ident: R11-20250114 article-title: Calcification in the dental pulp publication-title: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(68)90165-5 – volume: 28 start-page: 212 year: 2024 ident: R19-20250114 article-title: Comparing accuracy in guided endodontics: Dynamic real-time navigation, static guides, and manual approaches for access cavity preparation – An in vitro study using 3D printed teeth publication-title: Clin Oral Investig doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05603-8 – volume: 46 start-page: 1907 year: 2020 ident: R27-20250114 article-title: Guided endodontics: Volume of dental tissue removed by guided access cavity preparation-an ex vivo study publication-title: J Endod doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.09.008 – volume: 11 start-page: 3727 year: 2018 ident: R2-20250114 article-title: Calcified canal and negotiation-a review publication-title: Res J Pharm Technol doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00683.2 – volume: 132 start-page: 104487 year: 2023 ident: R28-20250114 article-title: Accuracy of dental implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: An in vitro study publication-title: J Dent doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104487 – volume: 13 start-page: S173 year: 2022 ident: R21-20250114 article-title: Knowledge, attitude, and practice of ultrasonics in endodontic treatment: A Survey among general practitioners and endodontists publication-title: J Adv Pharm Technol Res doi: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_242_22 – volume: 33 start-page: 81 year: 2007 ident: R5-20250114 article-title: Ultrasonics in endodontics: A review of the literature publication-title: J Endod doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.008 – volume: 39 start-page: 1119 year: 2013 ident: R14-20250114 article-title: Potential correlation between statins and pulp chamber calcification publication-title: J Endod doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.005 – volume: 22 start-page: 503 year: 2019 ident: R34-20250114 article-title: Conservative management of type II dens invaginatus with guided endodontic approach: A case series publication-title: J Conserv Dent Endod doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_30_20 – volume: 26 start-page: 258 year: 2023 ident: R7-20250114 article-title: Tooth substance loss after incisal endodontic access and novel single-tooth template-guided endodontic access in three-dimensional printed resin incisors with simulated pulp canal calcification: A comparative: In vitro: Study publication-title: J Conserv Dent Endod doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_3_23 – volume: 46 start-page: 1745 year: 2020 ident: R26-20250114 article-title: Dynamically navigated versus freehand access cavity preparation: A comparative study on substance loss using simulated calcified canals publication-title: J Endod doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.07.032 – volume: 47 start-page: 286 year: 2021 ident: R18-20250114 article-title: Minimization of tooth substance removal in normally calcified teeth using guided endodontics: An in vitro pilot study publication-title: J Endod doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.10.025 – volume: 34 start-page: 330 year: 2023 ident: R29-20250114 article-title: Accuracy of implant placement with a combined use of static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial publication-title: Clin Oral Implants Res doi: 10.1111/clr.14043 – volume: 23 start-page: 533 year: 2020 ident: R24-20250114 article-title: Three-dimensional printing: A revealing pathway to an unpredictable maze publication-title: J Conserv Dent doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_190_19 – volume: 19 start-page: 13900 year: 2022 ident: R8-20250114 article-title: Guided endodontics: A literature review publication-title: Int J Environ Res Public Health doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113900 – volume: 21 start-page: 369 year: 2010 ident: R10-20250114 article-title: A radiographic correlation between systemic disorders and pulp stones publication-title: Indian J Dent Res doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.70806 – volume: 47 start-page: 658 year: 2021 ident: R6-20250114 article-title: Guided endodontic access in a maxillary molar using a dynamic navigation system publication-title: J Endod doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.09.019 |
| SSID | ssib055638252 ssib053489921 ssj0002990980 ssj0064490 |
| Score | 2.3261864 |
| Snippet | Abstract
Aims:
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of access cavity preparation using guided endodontics (GE) and conventional technique (CT) in... This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of access cavity preparation using guided endodontics (GE) and conventional technique (CT) in calcified canals.... Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of access cavity preparation using guided endodontics (GE) and conventional technique (CT) in calcified canals.... AbstractAims:This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of access cavity preparation using guided endodontics (GE) and conventional technique (CT) in calcified... This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of access cavity preparation using guided endodontics (GE) and conventional technique (CT) in calcified... |
| SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref wolterskluwer |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 90 |
| SubjectTerms | Calcification Comparative analysis Computed tomography CT imaging Endodontics Methods Original Original Article Root canals Scanning Statistical analysis Teeth |
| Title | Comparison of tooth substance loss and angle deviation in access cavity preparation using guided endodontics and conventional method in calcified canals - An in vitro study |
| URI | https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_533_24 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39974687 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3214448426 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3168777082 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11835359 |
| Volume | 28 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLa28YKEEIhbYQwjISFUZTSJk9i8VV3HNG1Dmjqpb1biOFvHSKq2AYkHfhE_knPsLnPaIQ1eoip2bLffV_uck3Mh5F2axDrC8DM_zZXHWBF4WZEV-JLXZxlI7LyHAc7HJ_HBGTscR-ONDTdDcL3IdtXPW-NK_gdVuAe4YpTsPyDbDAo34DPgC1dAGK53wnjgFhEEKbIy7uYZCnzwd72C82-Zi_XchkdZGNDEkZo6iV2VmtIR05m2KcChsTbGg_N6koMoqssc1NaySeXc8lG3xadxNMAZXfvgAfQhu5p3PTQ2QgOMPqucFLbrUrBCb25jF_6OS4SxsfqcmcyZ_MbeWs5NhYLuaXqJiR5nXeMjvt5-nJZ141uUWhe2U63nF_V6373qanoxce0fQeTYP8w2GYio57GkZ3dxfcu95T4f8DU-203b1itdPUuY38OcFoeDveEuXiQIxtLGe7fTdp98kftnR0dyNByPNsm9APSV0DEboUiAZ74wVfyaldlX5jjJx9UpWiLSqqDgSEqrXrwPflToYTH_agIsHDFp9Ig8XCJL-5asj8mGLp-Q3zdEpVVBDVFpQ1SKRKWAODVEpQ1R6aSklqjUEpU6RKWGqNQSlTpcMSO5RKWWqDhaQ1RqiUo92jfTGKJSQ9Sn5Gx_OBoceMsyIZ5iTMw9ngtdZFHEuV_EWaIYVzHjcGwnIU_THs-5iIogYTrOQbkPw5jleSC4z0ScCK3i8BnZKqtSvyCUZ8JP4zAPmFZMg_IUqVwokBdYJFSR8g75cI2MnNpsMBK0aERRGgAdFDvkDUInbTxzs93IPg_CEKsqwWjvTQ9kHSCo0mVEDKwFk7K1em63esIRoNrN1_SQy-1pLrECGWMcJPAOeds045PoVlnqqoY-foz5QEEN6JDnlk3N9wLNJWHQ3CG8xbOmAyamb7eUkwuToN4HOSEKI9Ehn1qUlN9siO9ffzMpevKakS_vsOpX5P7NlrBNthazWr8GJWGR7ZDNz2Mfrse_hjvmz_gHP6Aggg |
| linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+tooth+substance+loss+and+angle+deviation+in+access+cavity+preparation+using+guided+endodontics+and+conventional+method+in+calcified+canals+-+An+in+vitro+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+conservative+dentistry+and+endodontics&rft.au=Bansal%2C+Rajinder+Kumar&rft.au=Bansal%2C+Manu&rft.au=Garg%2C+Reeshu&rft.au=Bansal%2C+Dolphi&rft.date=2025-01-01&rft.issn=2950-4708&rft.eissn=2950-4708&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=90&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103%2FJCDE.JCDE_533_24&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2950-4716&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2950-4716&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2950-4716&client=summon |