Toward a hybrid brain–computer interface based on imagined movement and visual attention

• Published in: Journal of neural engineering Vol. 7; no. 2; p. 026007
• Main Authors: Allison, B Z, Brunner, C, Kaiser, V, Müller-Putz, G R, Neuper, C, Pfurtscheller, G
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England IOP Publishing 01.04.2010
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Attention - physiology; Brain - physiology; Electroencephalography - methods; Evoked Potentials, Visual; Female; Functional Laterality; Hand - physiology; Humans; Imagination - physiology; Male; Motor Activity - physiology; Neuropsychological Tests; Periodicity; Photic Stimulation; Pilot Projects; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; User-Computer Interface; Visual Perception - physiology; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1741-2552; 1741-2560; 1741-2552
• DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/7/2/026007

Brain-computer interface (BCI) systems do not work for all users. This article introduces a novel combination of tasks that could inspire BCI systems that are more accurate than conventional BCIs, especially for users who cannot attain accuracy adequate for effective communication. Subjects performed tasks typically used in two BCI approaches, namely event-related desynchronization (ERD) and steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP), both individually and in a 'hybrid' condition that combines both tasks. Electroencephalographic (EEG) data were recorded across three conditions. Subjects imagined moving the left or right hand (ERD), focused on one of the two oscillating visual stimuli (SSVEP), and then simultaneously performed both tasks. Accuracy and subjective measures were assessed. Offline analyses suggested that half of the subjects did not produce brain patterns that could be accurately discriminated in response to at least one of the two tasks. If these subjects produced comparable EEG patterns when trying to use a BCI, these subjects would not be able to communicate effectively because the BCI would make too many errors. Results also showed that switching to a different task used in BCIs could improve accuracy in some of these users. Switching to a hybrid approach eliminated this problem completely, and subjects generally did not consider the hybrid condition more difficult. Results validate this hybrid approach and suggest that subjects who cannot use a BCI should consider switching to a different BCI approach, especially a hybrid BCI. Subjects proficient with both approaches might combine them to increase information throughput by improving accuracy, reducing selection time, and/or increasing the number of possible commands.