Associations between RetNet gene polymorphisms and the efficacy of orthokeratology for myopia control: a retrospective clinical study

This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia. A retrospective clinical study was conducted with a sample of 545 children aged 8-12 years who had myopia and have initially worn orthokeratology lenses for one year. Whole-genome s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEye and vision (Novato, Calif.) Vol. 12; no. 1; p. 13
Main Authors Xia, Ruijing, Yu, Xiangyi, Wu, Hao, Peng, Lulu, Du, Zhenlin, Yu, Xiaoguang, Xing, Shilai, Lu, Fan, Mao, Xinjie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 17.03.2025
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia. A retrospective clinical study was conducted with a sample of 545 children aged 8-12 years who had myopia and have initially worn orthokeratology lenses for one year. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was also performed on 60 participants in two groups, one with rapid axial length (AL) progression of larger than 0.33 mm and the other with slow AL progression of less than 0.09 mm. The RetNet database was used to screen candidate genes that may contribute to the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in controlling myopia. Children with greater baseline AL, greater spherical equivalent (SE) and greater age had better myopia control with orthokeratology lenses. A significant excess of nonsynonymous variants was observed among those with slow myopia progression, and these were prominently enriched in retinal disease-related genes. Subsequently, RIMS2 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.01, P = 0.0097] and LCA5 (OR = 9.27, P = 0.0089) were found to harbor an excess number of nonsynonymous variants in patients with slow progression of high myopia. Two intronic common variants rs36006402 in SLC7A14 and rs2285814 in CLUAP1 were strongly associated with AL growth. The identification of these novel genes associated with the effectiveness of orthokeratology lens therapy in myopic children provides insight into the genetic mechanism of orthokeratology treatment. The effectiveness of orthokeratology lens treatment relates to interindividual variability in the control of AL growth in myopic eyes. The efficacy increased when patients carried more nonsynonymous variants in retinal disease-related gene sets. These data serve as reference for genetic counselling and the management of patients who choose orthokeratology lenses to control myopia.
AbstractList This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia. A retrospective clinical study was conducted with a sample of 545 children aged 8-12 years who had myopia and have initially worn orthokeratology lenses for one year. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was also performed on 60 participants in two groups, one with rapid axial length (AL) progression of larger than 0.33 mm and the other with slow AL progression of less than 0.09 mm. The RetNet database was used to screen candidate genes that may contribute to the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in controlling myopia. Children with greater baseline AL, greater spherical equivalent (SE) and greater age had better myopia control with orthokeratology lenses. A significant excess of nonsynonymous variants was observed among those with slow myopia progression, and these were prominently enriched in retinal disease-related genes. Subsequently, RIMS2 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.01, P = 0.0097] and LCA5 (OR = 9.27, P = 0.0089) were found to harbor an excess number of nonsynonymous variants in patients with slow progression of high myopia. Two intronic common variants rs36006402 in SLC7A14 and rs2285814 in CLUAP1 were strongly associated with AL growth. The identification of these novel genes associated with the effectiveness of orthokeratology lens therapy in myopic children provides insight into the genetic mechanism of orthokeratology treatment. The effectiveness of orthokeratology lens treatment relates to interindividual variability in the control of AL growth in myopic eyes. The efficacy increased when patients carried more nonsynonymous variants in retinal disease-related gene sets. These data serve as reference for genetic counselling and the management of patients who choose orthokeratology lenses to control myopia.
Abstract Background This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia. Methods A retrospective clinical study was conducted with a sample of 545 children aged 8–12 years who had myopia and have initially worn orthokeratology lenses for one year. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was also performed on 60 participants in two groups, one with rapid axial length (AL) progression of larger than 0.33 mm and the other with slow AL progression of less than 0.09 mm. The RetNet database was used to screen candidate genes that may contribute to the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in controlling myopia. Results Children with greater baseline AL, greater spherical equivalent (SE) and greater age had better myopia control with orthokeratology lenses. A significant excess of nonsynonymous variants was observed among those with slow myopia progression, and these were prominently enriched in retinal disease-related genes. Subsequently, RIMS2 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.01, P = 0.0097] and LCA5 (OR = 9.27, P = 0.0089) were found to harbor an excess number of nonsynonymous variants in patients with slow progression of high myopia. Two intronic common variants rs36006402 in SLC7A14 and rs2285814 in CLUAP1 were strongly associated with AL growth. The identification of these novel genes associated with the effectiveness of orthokeratology lens therapy in myopic children provides insight into the genetic mechanism of orthokeratology treatment. Conclusion The effectiveness of orthokeratology lens treatment relates to interindividual variability in the control of AL growth in myopic eyes. The efficacy increased when patients carried more nonsynonymous variants in retinal disease-related gene sets. These data serve as reference for genetic counselling and the management of patients who choose orthokeratology lenses to control myopia.
This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia.BACKGROUNDThis study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia.A retrospective clinical study was conducted with a sample of 545 children aged 8-12 years who had myopia and have initially worn orthokeratology lenses for one year. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was also performed on 60 participants in two groups, one with rapid axial length (AL) progression of larger than 0.33 mm and the other with slow AL progression of less than 0.09 mm. The RetNet database was used to screen candidate genes that may contribute to the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in controlling myopia.METHODSA retrospective clinical study was conducted with a sample of 545 children aged 8-12 years who had myopia and have initially worn orthokeratology lenses for one year. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was also performed on 60 participants in two groups, one with rapid axial length (AL) progression of larger than 0.33 mm and the other with slow AL progression of less than 0.09 mm. The RetNet database was used to screen candidate genes that may contribute to the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in controlling myopia.Children with greater baseline AL, greater spherical equivalent (SE) and greater age had better myopia control with orthokeratology lenses. A significant excess of nonsynonymous variants was observed among those with slow myopia progression, and these were prominently enriched in retinal disease-related genes. Subsequently, RIMS2 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.01, P = 0.0097] and LCA5 (OR = 9.27, P = 0.0089) were found to harbor an excess number of nonsynonymous variants in patients with slow progression of high myopia. Two intronic common variants rs36006402 in SLC7A14 and rs2285814 in CLUAP1 were strongly associated with AL growth. The identification of these novel genes associated with the effectiveness of orthokeratology lens therapy in myopic children provides insight into the genetic mechanism of orthokeratology treatment.RESULTSChildren with greater baseline AL, greater spherical equivalent (SE) and greater age had better myopia control with orthokeratology lenses. A significant excess of nonsynonymous variants was observed among those with slow myopia progression, and these were prominently enriched in retinal disease-related genes. Subsequently, RIMS2 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.01, P = 0.0097] and LCA5 (OR = 9.27, P = 0.0089) were found to harbor an excess number of nonsynonymous variants in patients with slow progression of high myopia. Two intronic common variants rs36006402 in SLC7A14 and rs2285814 in CLUAP1 were strongly associated with AL growth. The identification of these novel genes associated with the effectiveness of orthokeratology lens therapy in myopic children provides insight into the genetic mechanism of orthokeratology treatment.The effectiveness of orthokeratology lens treatment relates to interindividual variability in the control of AL growth in myopic eyes. The efficacy increased when patients carried more nonsynonymous variants in retinal disease-related gene sets. These data serve as reference for genetic counselling and the management of patients who choose orthokeratology lenses to control myopia.CONCLUSIONThe effectiveness of orthokeratology lens treatment relates to interindividual variability in the control of AL growth in myopic eyes. The efficacy increased when patients carried more nonsynonymous variants in retinal disease-related gene sets. These data serve as reference for genetic counselling and the management of patients who choose orthokeratology lenses to control myopia.
This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia. A retrospective clinical study was conducted with a sample of 545 children aged 8-12 years who had myopia and have initially worn orthokeratology lenses for one year. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was also performed on 60 participants in two groups, one with rapid axial length (AL) progression of larger than 0.33 mm and the other with slow AL progression of less than 0.09 mm. The RetNet database was used to screen candidate genes that may contribute to the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in controlling myopia. Children with greater baseline AL, greater spherical equivalent (SE) and greater age had better myopia control with orthokeratology lenses. A significant excess of nonsynonymous variants was observed among those with slow myopia progression, and these were prominently enriched in retinal disease-related genes. Subsequently, RIMS2 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.01, P = 0.0097] and LCA5 (OR = 9.27, P = 0.0089) were found to harbor an excess number of nonsynonymous variants in patients with slow progression of high myopia. Two intronic common variants rs36006402 in SLC7A14 and rs2285814 in CLUAP1 were strongly associated with AL growth. The identification of these novel genes associated with the effectiveness of orthokeratology lens therapy in myopic children provides insight into the genetic mechanism of orthokeratology treatment. The effectiveness of orthokeratology lens treatment relates to interindividual variability in the control of AL growth in myopic eyes. The efficacy increased when patients carried more nonsynonymous variants in retinal disease-related gene sets. These data serve as reference for genetic counselling and the management of patients who choose orthokeratology lenses to control myopia.
Background This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia. Methods A retrospective clinical study was conducted with a sample of 545 children aged 8-12 years who had myopia and have initially worn orthokeratology lenses for one year. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was also performed on 60 participants in two groups, one with rapid axial length (AL) progression of larger than 0.33 mm and the other with slow AL progression of less than 0.09 mm. The RetNet database was used to screen candidate genes that may contribute to the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in controlling myopia. Results Children with greater baseline AL, greater spherical equivalent (SE) and greater age had better myopia control with orthokeratology lenses. A significant excess of nonsynonymous variants was observed among those with slow myopia progression, and these were prominently enriched in retinal disease-related genes. Subsequently, RIMS2 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.01, P = 0.0097] and LCA5 (OR = 9.27, P = 0.0089) were found to harbor an excess number of nonsynonymous variants in patients with slow progression of high myopia. Two intronic common variants rs36006402 in SLC7A14 and rs2285814 in CLUAP1 were strongly associated with AL growth. The identification of these novel genes associated with the effectiveness of orthokeratology lens therapy in myopic children provides insight into the genetic mechanism of orthokeratology treatment. Conclusion The effectiveness of orthokeratology lens treatment relates to interindividual variability in the control of AL growth in myopic eyes. The efficacy increased when patients carried more nonsynonymous variants in retinal disease-related gene sets. These data serve as reference for genetic counselling and the management of patients who choose orthokeratology lenses to control myopia. Keywords: Orthokeratology, Myopia control, WGS, Burden test, Single-variant association analysis
ArticleNumber 13
Audience Academic
Author Xia, Ruijing
Du, Zhenlin
Mao, Xinjie
Xing, Shilai
Wu, Hao
Peng, Lulu
Yu, Xiaoguang
Lu, Fan
Yu, Xiangyi
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ruijing
  surname: Xia
  fullname: Xia, Ruijing
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Xiangyi
  surname: Yu
  fullname: Yu, Xiangyi
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Hao
  surname: Wu
  fullname: Wu, Hao
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Lulu
  surname: Peng
  fullname: Peng, Lulu
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Zhenlin
  surname: Du
  fullname: Du, Zhenlin
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Xiaoguang
  surname: Yu
  fullname: Yu, Xiaoguang
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Shilai
  surname: Xing
  fullname: Xing, Shilai
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Fan
  surname: Lu
  fullname: Lu, Fan
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Xinjie
  orcidid: 0000-0001-9446-548X
  surname: Mao
  fullname: Mao, Xinjie
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40091069$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptks9q3DAQh01JadI0L9BDERRKL04lW9bKvYQl9E8gtFDasxjLo7VS2XIlbYofoO9dZTcNWSg-eDz-5kODfs-Lo8lPWBQvGT1nTIp3kVMhqpJWTUkpr0TJnxQnVZ2L3OJHj-rj4izGG0opY_lrVT0rjjmlLaOiPSn-rGP02kKyfoqkw_QbcSLfMH3BRDY4IZm9W0Yf5sHGMRKYepIGJGiM1aAX4g3xIQ3-JwZI3vnNQowPZFz8bIFoP6Xg3XsCJGCu4ow62Vsk2tkpCxyJadsvL4qnBlzEs_v3afHj44fvl5_L66-fri7X16XmXKZSGAMNZ0ZqgdCxlrFO1o2kkrX9yvS6ZTVlrdFGUkMzIEyXB2RX10JDjaI-La723t7DjZqDHSEsyoNVu4YPGwUhWe1QmYZKAGq6RlMuWNY1q67vQAMAUg7ZdbF3zdtuxF5j3hTcgfTwz2QHtfG3iuWDV6Li2fD23hD8ry3GpEYbNToHE_ptVDVbyUq2VDQZfb1HN5DPZifjs1Lf4Wota1ZLTiXN1Pl_qPz0ONp8FWhs7h8MvHk0MCC4NETvtrs0HIKvHi_7sOW_IGWg2gM6X3IMaB4QRtVdYNU-sConUu0Cq3j9FyHr37k
Cites_doi 10.1097/01.opx.0000232840.66716.af
10.1038/ncomms4517
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1487-23.2023
10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.010
10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.04.018
10.1167/iovs.15-17555
10.1038/eye.2013.280
10.1186/s12886-022-02294-1
10.1097/OPX.0b013e31825da339
10.1038/nature15393
10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.303
10.1111/aos.14911
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.45821
10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ea16ea
10.1167/iovs.14-14850
10.1038/ng2066
10.1038/nmeth0410-248
10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4
10.1038/s41588-018-0184-y
10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
10.1016/j.clae.2019.11.012
10.1038/ng.548
10.1111/opo.12722
10.1167/iovs.13-12527
10.1038/s41588-019-0530-8
10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.09.001
10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.018
10.1038/s41422-020-0322-9
10.1093/nar/gkg509
10.1016/j.exer.2018.02.007
10.1172/JCI45627
10.1007/s10654-015-0010-0
10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.004
10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.011
10.1097/ICL.0000000000000493
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0444-23.2023
10.3389/fgene.2019.00736
10.1016/j.clae.2015.07.006
10.1111/opo.13070
10.1097/OPX.0000000000000034
10.1167/iovs.11-8453
10.1159/000510779
10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182279cfa
10.1371/journal.pone.0175913
10.2471/BLT.07.041210
10.1167/iovs.10-5485
10.1086/519795
10.1167/iovs.12-9628
10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.3451
10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.015
10.1097/APO.0000000000000234
10.1038/s41598-019-49041-z
10.1038/ncb1706
10.1167/iovs.14-13935
10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182357f79
10.1097/00006324-200010000-00009
10.1136/bjo-2021-321005
10.1001/archopht.123.7.977
10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7
10.1167/iovs.12-10565
10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.05.029
10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.06.007
10.1038/s12276-018-0071-8
10.1097/OPX.0000000000000516
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004219
10.1167/iovs.14-14888
10.1093/nar/gky1016
10.1167/iovs.18-25967
10.1038/s41598-020-69710-8
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2025. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd.
The Author(s) 2025 2025
Copyright_xml – notice: 2025. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: The Author(s) 2025 2025
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s40662-025-00426-4
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 2326-0254
EndPage 13
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_f508aa0fb5c04610ab57bdbacaaae04a
PMC11912624
A831384080
40091069
10_1186_s40662_025_00426_4
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GroupedDBID 0R~
5VS
7RV
7X7
8C1
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAYXX
ABUWG
ACGFS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
AQUVI
ASPBG
AVWKF
BAPOH
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BKEYQ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
EBLON
EBS
EMOBN
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IEA
IHR
IHW
ITC
M0T
M~E
NAPCQ
OK1
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
RBZ
ROL
RPM
RSV
SOJ
UKHRP
NPM
PMFND
7X8
PPXIY
5PM
PJZUB
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-6ffa541f8c6eab1911b83580819d7fdc913019fcf80f0ab16fbfa58b336ca3e63
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 2326-0254
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:30:07 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:33:48 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 04:11:39 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:57:20 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:58:43 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:23:40 EDT 2025
Thu Mar 20 02:21:27 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 05:19:03 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Myopia control
WGS
Orthokeratology
Burden test
Single-variant association analysis
Language English
License 2025. The Author(s).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c448t-6ffa541f8c6eab1911b83580819d7fdc913019fcf80f0ab16fbfa58b336ca3e63
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-9446-548X
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/f508aa0fb5c04610ab57bdbacaaae04a
PMID 40091069
PQID 3178289065
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f508aa0fb5c04610ab57bdbacaaae04a
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11912624
proquest_miscellaneous_3178289065
gale_infotracmisc_A831384080
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A831384080
gale_healthsolutions_A831384080
pubmed_primary_40091069
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40662_025_00426_4
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-03-17
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-03-17
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-03-17
  day: 17
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle Eye and vision (Novato, Calif.)
PublicationTitleAlternate Eye Vis (Lond)
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References D Troilo (426_CR61) 2019; 60
W McLaren (426_CR26) 2016; 17
Y Liu (426_CR60) 2012; 53
S Poudel (426_CR66) 2024; 44
P Cho (426_CR15) 2012; 53
SM Saw (426_CR46) 2000; 77
P Cho (426_CR13) 2005; 30
S Lee (426_CR35) 2012; 91
K Jaganathan (426_CR31) 2019; 176
T Hiraoka (426_CR16) 2012; 53
Y Qi (426_CR17) 2022; 22
J Shen (426_CR20) 2010; 87
Y Cao (426_CR33) 2020; 30
KG Griffis (426_CR67) 2023; 43
ZB Jin (426_CR71) 2014; 5
S Wang (426_CR59) 2021; 64
KI Kendig (426_CR22) 2019; 10
MC Wu (426_CR34) 2011; 89
AC Fu (426_CR54) 2016; 39
EJ Lee (426_CR43) 2018; 44
KJ Karczewski (426_CR27) 2020; 581
W Lin (426_CR55) 2023; 43
J Santodomingo-Rubido (426_CR45) 2013; 90
Q Tan (426_CR58) 2020; 40
WN Charman (426_CR12) 2006; 83
PJ Foster (426_CR6) 2014; 28
R Chen (426_CR21) 2020; 43
Y Omori (426_CR72) 2008; 10
S Resnikoff (426_CR1) 2008; 86
X Yu (426_CR50) 2023; 6
N Kinoshita (426_CR57) 2020; 10
KM Williams (426_CR3) 2015; 122
P Kang (426_CR19) 2012; 89
W Sun (426_CR51) 2015; 56
KM Williams (426_CR2) 2015; 30
W Zhou (426_CR38) 2018; 50
EL Smith 3rd (426_CR62) 2011; 88
S Mechaussier (426_CR65) 2020; 106
P Rentzsch (426_CR30) 2019; 47
A Auton (426_CR25) 2015; 526
HM Kang (426_CR41) 2010; 42
426_CR32
CW Pan (426_CR5) 2015; 92
PC Ng (426_CR29) 2003; 31
K Boldt (426_CR70) 2011; 121
YL Wong (426_CR8) 2016; 5
L Zhou (426_CR52) 2018; 171
L Jiang (426_CR39) 2019; 51
L Hyman (426_CR47) 2005; 123
B Wang (426_CR53) 2017; 12
TY Wong (426_CR9) 2014; 157
T Kakita (426_CR14) 2011; 52
Y Hu (426_CR49) 2020; 138
B Hwang (426_CR37) 2018; 50
J Yang (426_CR40) 2011; 88
AI den Hollander (426_CR69) 2007; 39
C Lee (426_CR73) 2014; 55
JJ Walline (426_CR10) 2020; 1
TM Jakobsen (426_CR56) 2022; 100
H Li (426_CR23) 2009; 25
S Purcell (426_CR24) 2007; 81
IA Adzhubei (426_CR28) 2010; 7
Y Zhong (426_CR44) 2015; 56
IG Morgan (426_CR7) 2018; 62
KM Williams (426_CR4) 2009; 127
C Chen (426_CR42) 2013; 54
E Vallespin (426_CR68) 2010; 127
D Jiang (426_CR63) 2014; 56
CA de Leeuw (426_CR36) 2015; 11
L Donovan (426_CR48) 2012; 89
C Zeitz (426_CR64) 2015; 45
J Rappon (426_CR11) 2023; 107
AKC Lam (426_CR18) 2019; 9
References_xml – volume: 83
  start-page: 641
  issue: 9
  year: 2006
  ident: 426_CR12
  publication-title: Optom Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000232840.66716.af
– volume: 5
  start-page: 3517
  year: 2014
  ident: 426_CR71
  publication-title: Nat Commun
  doi: 10.1038/ncomms4517
– volume: 44
  start-page: e1487232023
  issue: 3
  year: 2024
  ident: 426_CR66
  publication-title: J Neurosci
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1487-23.2023
– volume: 157
  start-page: 9
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: 426_CR9
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.010
– volume: 106
  start-page: 859
  issue: 6
  year: 2020
  ident: 426_CR65
  publication-title: Am J Hum Genet
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.04.018
– volume: 56
  start-page: 8365
  issue: 13
  year: 2015
  ident: 426_CR51
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17555
– volume: 28
  start-page: 202
  issue: 2
  year: 2014
  ident: 426_CR6
  publication-title: Eye (Lond)
  doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.280
– volume: 22
  start-page: 62
  issue: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 426_CR17
  publication-title: BMC Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02294-1
– volume: 89
  start-page: 1014
  issue: 7
  year: 2012
  ident: 426_CR19
  publication-title: Optom Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31825da339
– volume: 526
  start-page: 68
  issue: 7571
  year: 2015
  ident: 426_CR25
  publication-title: Nature
  doi: 10.1038/nature15393
– volume: 127
  start-page: 1632
  issue: 12
  year: 2009
  ident: 426_CR4
  publication-title: Arch Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.303
– volume: 100
  start-page: 175
  issue: 2
  year: 2022
  ident: 426_CR56
  publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1111/aos.14911
– volume: 6
  start-page: e2345821
  issue: 12
  year: 2023
  ident: 426_CR50
  publication-title: JAMA Netw Open
  doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.45821
– volume: 87
  start-page: 642
  issue: 9
  year: 2010
  ident: 426_CR20
  publication-title: Optom Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ea16ea
– volume: 56
  start-page: 339
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: 426_CR63
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14850
– volume: 39
  start-page: 889
  issue: 7
  year: 2007
  ident: 426_CR69
  publication-title: Nat Genet
  doi: 10.1038/ng2066
– volume: 7
  start-page: 248
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  ident: 426_CR28
  publication-title: Nat Methods
  doi: 10.1038/nmeth0410-248
– volume: 17
  start-page: 122
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 426_CR26
  publication-title: Genome Biol
  doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4
– volume: 50
  start-page: 1335
  issue: 9
  year: 2018
  ident: 426_CR38
  publication-title: Nat Genet
  doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0184-y
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1754
  issue: 14
  year: 2009
  ident: 426_CR23
  publication-title: Bioinformatics
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
– volume: 43
  start-page: 78
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 426_CR21
  publication-title: Cont Lens Anterior Eye
  doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2019.11.012
– volume: 42
  start-page: 348
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  ident: 426_CR41
  publication-title: Nat Genet
  doi: 10.1038/ng.548
– volume: 40
  start-page: 557
  year: 2020
  ident: 426_CR58
  publication-title: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
  doi: 10.1111/opo.12722
– volume: 54
  start-page: 6510
  issue: 10
  year: 2013
  ident: 426_CR42
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12527
– volume: 1
  start-page: CD004916
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 426_CR10
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– volume: 51
  start-page: 1749
  issue: 12
  year: 2019
  ident: 426_CR39
  publication-title: Nat Genet
  doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0530-8
– volume: 45
  start-page: 58
  year: 2015
  ident: 426_CR64
  publication-title: Prog Retin Eye Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.09.001
– volume: 122
  start-page: 1489
  issue: 7
  year: 2015
  ident: 426_CR3
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.018
– ident: 426_CR32
– volume: 30
  start-page: 717
  issue: 9
  year: 2020
  ident: 426_CR33
  publication-title: Cell Res
  doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0322-9
– volume: 31
  start-page: 3812
  issue: 13
  year: 2003
  ident: 426_CR29
  publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res
  doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg509
– volume: 171
  start-page: 76
  year: 2018
  ident: 426_CR52
  publication-title: Exp Eye Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.02.007
– volume: 127
  start-page: 487
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  ident: 426_CR68
  publication-title: Hum Genet
– volume: 121
  start-page: 2169
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  ident: 426_CR70
  publication-title: J Clin Invest
  doi: 10.1172/JCI45627
– volume: 30
  start-page: 305
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  ident: 426_CR2
  publication-title: Eur J Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0010-0
– volume: 62
  start-page: 134
  year: 2018
  ident: 426_CR7
  publication-title: Prog Retin Eye Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.004
– volume: 88
  start-page: 76
  issue: 1
  year: 2011
  ident: 426_CR40
  publication-title: Am J Hum Genet
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.011
– volume: 44
  start-page: 292
  issue: 5
  year: 2018
  ident: 426_CR43
  publication-title: Eye Contact Lens
  doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000493
– volume: 43
  start-page: 4379
  issue: 24
  year: 2023
  ident: 426_CR67
  publication-title: J Neurosci
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0444-23.2023
– volume: 10
  start-page: 736
  year: 2019
  ident: 426_CR22
  publication-title: Front Genet
  doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00736
– volume: 39
  start-page: 62
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 426_CR54
  publication-title: Cont Lens Anterior Eye
  doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2015.07.006
– volume: 43
  start-page: 122
  issue: 1
  year: 2023
  ident: 426_CR55
  publication-title: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
  doi: 10.1111/opo.13070
– volume: 90
  start-page: 1225
  issue: 11
  year: 2013
  ident: 426_CR45
  publication-title: Optom Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000034
– volume: 53
  start-page: 3913
  issue: 7
  year: 2012
  ident: 426_CR16
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8453
– volume: 64
  start-page: 723
  issue: 5
  year: 2021
  ident: 426_CR59
  publication-title: Ophthalmic Res
  doi: 10.1159/000510779
– volume: 88
  start-page: 1029
  issue: 9
  year: 2011
  ident: 426_CR62
  publication-title: Optom Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182279cfa
– volume: 12
  start-page: e0175913
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  ident: 426_CR53
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175913
– volume: 86
  start-page: 63
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: 426_CR1
  publication-title: Bull World Health Organ
  doi: 10.2471/BLT.07.041210
– volume: 52
  start-page: 2170
  issue: 5
  year: 2011
  ident: 426_CR14
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5485
– volume: 81
  start-page: 559
  issue: 3
  year: 2007
  ident: 426_CR24
  publication-title: Am J Hum Genet
  doi: 10.1086/519795
– volume: 53
  start-page: 5085
  issue: 8
  year: 2012
  ident: 426_CR60
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9628
– volume: 138
  start-page: 1129
  issue: 11
  year: 2020
  ident: 426_CR49
  publication-title: JAMA Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.3451
– volume: 176
  start-page: 535
  issue: 3
  year: 2019
  ident: 426_CR31
  publication-title: Cell
  doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.015
– volume: 5
  start-page: 394
  issue: 6
  year: 2016
  ident: 426_CR8
  publication-title: Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)
  doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000234
– volume: 9
  start-page: 12566
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 426_CR18
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49041-z
– volume: 10
  start-page: 437
  issue: 4
  year: 2008
  ident: 426_CR72
  publication-title: Nat Cell Biol
  doi: 10.1038/ncb1706
– volume: 56
  start-page: 4514
  issue: 8
  year: 2015
  ident: 426_CR44
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-13935
– volume: 89
  start-page: 27
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 426_CR48
  publication-title: Optom Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182357f79
– volume: 77
  start-page: 549
  issue: 10
  year: 2000
  ident: 426_CR46
  publication-title: Optom Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1097/00006324-200010000-00009
– volume: 107
  start-page: 1709
  issue: 11
  year: 2023
  ident: 426_CR11
  publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1136/bjo-2021-321005
– volume: 30
  start-page: 71
  issue: 1
  year: 2005
  ident: 426_CR13
  publication-title: Optom Vis Sci
– volume: 123
  start-page: 977
  issue: 7
  year: 2005
  ident: 426_CR47
  publication-title: Arch Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.7.977
– volume: 581
  start-page: 434
  issue: 7809
  year: 2020
  ident: 426_CR27
  publication-title: Nature
  doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7
– volume: 53
  start-page: 7077
  issue: 11
  year: 2012
  ident: 426_CR15
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10565
– volume: 89
  start-page: 82
  issue: 1
  year: 2011
  ident: 426_CR34
  publication-title: Am J Hum Genet
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.05.029
– volume: 91
  start-page: 224
  issue: 2
  year: 2012
  ident: 426_CR35
  publication-title: Am J Hum Genet
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.06.007
– volume: 50
  start-page: 1
  issue: 8
  year: 2018
  ident: 426_CR37
  publication-title: Exp Mol Med
  doi: 10.1038/s12276-018-0071-8
– volume: 92
  start-page: 258
  issue: 3
  year: 2015
  ident: 426_CR5
  publication-title: Optom Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000516
– volume: 11
  start-page: e1004219
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  ident: 426_CR36
  publication-title: PLoS Comput Biol
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004219
– volume: 55
  start-page: 4585
  issue: 7
  year: 2014
  ident: 426_CR73
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14888
– volume: 47
  start-page: D886
  issue: D1
  year: 2019
  ident: 426_CR30
  publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res
  doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1016
– volume: 60
  start-page: M31
  issue: 3
  year: 2019
  ident: 426_CR61
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-25967
– volume: 10
  start-page: 12750
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 426_CR57
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69710-8
SSID ssj0001125472
Score 2.2865703
Snippet This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia. A retrospective clinical study was...
Background This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia. Methods A retrospective...
This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia. A retrospective clinical study was...
This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia.BACKGROUNDThis study investigated how...
Abstract Background This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia. Methods A...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 13
SubjectTerms Anopheles
Burden test
Clinical trials
Genes
Genetic aspects
Genetic polymorphisms
Genomes
Genomics
Medical genetics
Myopia
Myopia control
Orthokeratology
Single-variant association analysis
WGS
Title Associations between RetNet gene polymorphisms and the efficacy of orthokeratology for myopia control: a retrospective clinical study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40091069
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3178289065
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11912624
https://doaj.org/article/f508aa0fb5c04610ab57bdbacaaae04a
Volume 12
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3fb9MwED7BkBAvCDZ-BEYxEoIHFK1OHMflLZs2TZVWocGkvlm2Y2sVNKmW7KF_AP83ZyetEvHACy9pVLtR7bvLfWfffQb4mDhdpqWgseOZiRn62Fi7ksbKac1d7oRQfkf3asEvb9h8mS0HR335nLCOHribuBOHCEKpqdOZCdzgSme5LrUySik7ZQEaoc8bBFNhdQX9NsuTXZWM4CcN81znsT-9NcQNMRt5okDY__dreeCXxjmTAyd08Qye9uiRFN2_fg4PbHUIR0WFkfN6Sz6RkM8ZFsoP4fFVv21-BL8HQmhIn5pFrm27sC1BDbJkU__armuc81WzboiqSoLAkFjPL6HMltSO-P2d-qenYA7PJwh2yXpbb1aK9OnuX4kidxbvdtWbZFd2SQKJ7Qu4uTj_cXYZ9-cvxAaDtjbmzqmMUScMt0pjYEe18LumCCLK3JVmhv6PzpxxYupQLpQ7jT8QOk25Uanl6Us4qOrKvgaihMc1nluGCVY6KgxqSOooNXwmcm0i-LKThdx0NBsyhCeCy05yEiUng-Qki-DUi2vf01Nkhy9QcWSvOPJfihPBey9s2dWb7g1dFiKlKYa9YhrB59DDmzrKHOe7q1jAIXnSrFHP41FPNFEzav6wUyjpm3xeW2Xr-0YievMhL-LACF51CrYfFb5dEcvxWQRipHqjYY9bqtVtYAj3rH0JT9ib_zFRb-FJEszGc9kew0F7d2_fIRJr9QQe5sscr-KMTuBRUcy_z_Hz9Hzx7XoSDPIPVYg68A
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Associations+between+RetNet+gene+polymorphisms+and+the+efficacy+of+orthokeratology+for+myopia+control%3A+a+retrospective+clinical+study&rft.jtitle=Eye+and+vision+%28Novato%2C+Calif.%29&rft.au=Xia%2C+Ruijing&rft.au=Yu%2C+Xiangyi&rft.au=Wu%2C+Hao&rft.au=Peng%2C+Lulu&rft.date=2025-03-17&rft.issn=2326-0254&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs40662-025-00426-4&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2326-0254&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2326-0254&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2326-0254&client=summon