Associations between RetNet gene polymorphisms and the efficacy of orthokeratology for myopia control: a retrospective clinical study
This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia. A retrospective clinical study was conducted with a sample of 545 children aged 8-12 years who had myopia and have initially worn orthokeratology lenses for one year. Whole-genome s...
Saved in:
Published in | Eye and vision (Novato, Calif.) Vol. 12; no. 1; p. 13 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
17.03.2025
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia.
A retrospective clinical study was conducted with a sample of 545 children aged 8-12 years who had myopia and have initially worn orthokeratology lenses for one year. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was also performed on 60 participants in two groups, one with rapid axial length (AL) progression of larger than 0.33 mm and the other with slow AL progression of less than 0.09 mm. The RetNet database was used to screen candidate genes that may contribute to the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in controlling myopia.
Children with greater baseline AL, greater spherical equivalent (SE) and greater age had better myopia control with orthokeratology lenses. A significant excess of nonsynonymous variants was observed among those with slow myopia progression, and these were prominently enriched in retinal disease-related genes. Subsequently, RIMS2 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.01, P = 0.0097] and LCA5 (OR = 9.27, P = 0.0089) were found to harbor an excess number of nonsynonymous variants in patients with slow progression of high myopia. Two intronic common variants rs36006402 in SLC7A14 and rs2285814 in CLUAP1 were strongly associated with AL growth. The identification of these novel genes associated with the effectiveness of orthokeratology lens therapy in myopic children provides insight into the genetic mechanism of orthokeratology treatment.
The effectiveness of orthokeratology lens treatment relates to interindividual variability in the control of AL growth in myopic eyes. The efficacy increased when patients carried more nonsynonymous variants in retinal disease-related gene sets. These data serve as reference for genetic counselling and the management of patients who choose orthokeratology lenses to control myopia. |
---|---|
AbstractList | This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia. A retrospective clinical study was conducted with a sample of 545 children aged 8-12 years who had myopia and have initially worn orthokeratology lenses for one year. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was also performed on 60 participants in two groups, one with rapid axial length (AL) progression of larger than 0.33 mm and the other with slow AL progression of less than 0.09 mm. The RetNet database was used to screen candidate genes that may contribute to the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in controlling myopia. Children with greater baseline AL, greater spherical equivalent (SE) and greater age had better myopia control with orthokeratology lenses. A significant excess of nonsynonymous variants was observed among those with slow myopia progression, and these were prominently enriched in retinal disease-related genes. Subsequently, RIMS2 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.01, P = 0.0097] and LCA5 (OR = 9.27, P = 0.0089) were found to harbor an excess number of nonsynonymous variants in patients with slow progression of high myopia. Two intronic common variants rs36006402 in SLC7A14 and rs2285814 in CLUAP1 were strongly associated with AL growth. The identification of these novel genes associated with the effectiveness of orthokeratology lens therapy in myopic children provides insight into the genetic mechanism of orthokeratology treatment. The effectiveness of orthokeratology lens treatment relates to interindividual variability in the control of AL growth in myopic eyes. The efficacy increased when patients carried more nonsynonymous variants in retinal disease-related gene sets. These data serve as reference for genetic counselling and the management of patients who choose orthokeratology lenses to control myopia. Abstract Background This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia. Methods A retrospective clinical study was conducted with a sample of 545 children aged 8–12 years who had myopia and have initially worn orthokeratology lenses for one year. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was also performed on 60 participants in two groups, one with rapid axial length (AL) progression of larger than 0.33 mm and the other with slow AL progression of less than 0.09 mm. The RetNet database was used to screen candidate genes that may contribute to the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in controlling myopia. Results Children with greater baseline AL, greater spherical equivalent (SE) and greater age had better myopia control with orthokeratology lenses. A significant excess of nonsynonymous variants was observed among those with slow myopia progression, and these were prominently enriched in retinal disease-related genes. Subsequently, RIMS2 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.01, P = 0.0097] and LCA5 (OR = 9.27, P = 0.0089) were found to harbor an excess number of nonsynonymous variants in patients with slow progression of high myopia. Two intronic common variants rs36006402 in SLC7A14 and rs2285814 in CLUAP1 were strongly associated with AL growth. The identification of these novel genes associated with the effectiveness of orthokeratology lens therapy in myopic children provides insight into the genetic mechanism of orthokeratology treatment. Conclusion The effectiveness of orthokeratology lens treatment relates to interindividual variability in the control of AL growth in myopic eyes. The efficacy increased when patients carried more nonsynonymous variants in retinal disease-related gene sets. These data serve as reference for genetic counselling and the management of patients who choose orthokeratology lenses to control myopia. This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia.BACKGROUNDThis study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia.A retrospective clinical study was conducted with a sample of 545 children aged 8-12 years who had myopia and have initially worn orthokeratology lenses for one year. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was also performed on 60 participants in two groups, one with rapid axial length (AL) progression of larger than 0.33 mm and the other with slow AL progression of less than 0.09 mm. The RetNet database was used to screen candidate genes that may contribute to the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in controlling myopia.METHODSA retrospective clinical study was conducted with a sample of 545 children aged 8-12 years who had myopia and have initially worn orthokeratology lenses for one year. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was also performed on 60 participants in two groups, one with rapid axial length (AL) progression of larger than 0.33 mm and the other with slow AL progression of less than 0.09 mm. The RetNet database was used to screen candidate genes that may contribute to the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in controlling myopia.Children with greater baseline AL, greater spherical equivalent (SE) and greater age had better myopia control with orthokeratology lenses. A significant excess of nonsynonymous variants was observed among those with slow myopia progression, and these were prominently enriched in retinal disease-related genes. Subsequently, RIMS2 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.01, P = 0.0097] and LCA5 (OR = 9.27, P = 0.0089) were found to harbor an excess number of nonsynonymous variants in patients with slow progression of high myopia. Two intronic common variants rs36006402 in SLC7A14 and rs2285814 in CLUAP1 were strongly associated with AL growth. The identification of these novel genes associated with the effectiveness of orthokeratology lens therapy in myopic children provides insight into the genetic mechanism of orthokeratology treatment.RESULTSChildren with greater baseline AL, greater spherical equivalent (SE) and greater age had better myopia control with orthokeratology lenses. A significant excess of nonsynonymous variants was observed among those with slow myopia progression, and these were prominently enriched in retinal disease-related genes. Subsequently, RIMS2 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.01, P = 0.0097] and LCA5 (OR = 9.27, P = 0.0089) were found to harbor an excess number of nonsynonymous variants in patients with slow progression of high myopia. Two intronic common variants rs36006402 in SLC7A14 and rs2285814 in CLUAP1 were strongly associated with AL growth. The identification of these novel genes associated with the effectiveness of orthokeratology lens therapy in myopic children provides insight into the genetic mechanism of orthokeratology treatment.The effectiveness of orthokeratology lens treatment relates to interindividual variability in the control of AL growth in myopic eyes. The efficacy increased when patients carried more nonsynonymous variants in retinal disease-related gene sets. These data serve as reference for genetic counselling and the management of patients who choose orthokeratology lenses to control myopia.CONCLUSIONThe effectiveness of orthokeratology lens treatment relates to interindividual variability in the control of AL growth in myopic eyes. The efficacy increased when patients carried more nonsynonymous variants in retinal disease-related gene sets. These data serve as reference for genetic counselling and the management of patients who choose orthokeratology lenses to control myopia. This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia. A retrospective clinical study was conducted with a sample of 545 children aged 8-12 years who had myopia and have initially worn orthokeratology lenses for one year. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was also performed on 60 participants in two groups, one with rapid axial length (AL) progression of larger than 0.33 mm and the other with slow AL progression of less than 0.09 mm. The RetNet database was used to screen candidate genes that may contribute to the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in controlling myopia. Children with greater baseline AL, greater spherical equivalent (SE) and greater age had better myopia control with orthokeratology lenses. A significant excess of nonsynonymous variants was observed among those with slow myopia progression, and these were prominently enriched in retinal disease-related genes. Subsequently, RIMS2 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.01, P = 0.0097] and LCA5 (OR = 9.27, P = 0.0089) were found to harbor an excess number of nonsynonymous variants in patients with slow progression of high myopia. Two intronic common variants rs36006402 in SLC7A14 and rs2285814 in CLUAP1 were strongly associated with AL growth. The identification of these novel genes associated with the effectiveness of orthokeratology lens therapy in myopic children provides insight into the genetic mechanism of orthokeratology treatment. The effectiveness of orthokeratology lens treatment relates to interindividual variability in the control of AL growth in myopic eyes. The efficacy increased when patients carried more nonsynonymous variants in retinal disease-related gene sets. These data serve as reference for genetic counselling and the management of patients who choose orthokeratology lenses to control myopia. Background This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia. Methods A retrospective clinical study was conducted with a sample of 545 children aged 8-12 years who had myopia and have initially worn orthokeratology lenses for one year. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was also performed on 60 participants in two groups, one with rapid axial length (AL) progression of larger than 0.33 mm and the other with slow AL progression of less than 0.09 mm. The RetNet database was used to screen candidate genes that may contribute to the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in controlling myopia. Results Children with greater baseline AL, greater spherical equivalent (SE) and greater age had better myopia control with orthokeratology lenses. A significant excess of nonsynonymous variants was observed among those with slow myopia progression, and these were prominently enriched in retinal disease-related genes. Subsequently, RIMS2 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.01, P = 0.0097] and LCA5 (OR = 9.27, P = 0.0089) were found to harbor an excess number of nonsynonymous variants in patients with slow progression of high myopia. Two intronic common variants rs36006402 in SLC7A14 and rs2285814 in CLUAP1 were strongly associated with AL growth. The identification of these novel genes associated with the effectiveness of orthokeratology lens therapy in myopic children provides insight into the genetic mechanism of orthokeratology treatment. Conclusion The effectiveness of orthokeratology lens treatment relates to interindividual variability in the control of AL growth in myopic eyes. The efficacy increased when patients carried more nonsynonymous variants in retinal disease-related gene sets. These data serve as reference for genetic counselling and the management of patients who choose orthokeratology lenses to control myopia. Keywords: Orthokeratology, Myopia control, WGS, Burden test, Single-variant association analysis |
ArticleNumber | 13 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Xia, Ruijing Du, Zhenlin Mao, Xinjie Xing, Shilai Wu, Hao Peng, Lulu Yu, Xiaoguang Lu, Fan Yu, Xiangyi |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ruijing surname: Xia fullname: Xia, Ruijing – sequence: 2 givenname: Xiangyi surname: Yu fullname: Yu, Xiangyi – sequence: 3 givenname: Hao surname: Wu fullname: Wu, Hao – sequence: 4 givenname: Lulu surname: Peng fullname: Peng, Lulu – sequence: 5 givenname: Zhenlin surname: Du fullname: Du, Zhenlin – sequence: 6 givenname: Xiaoguang surname: Yu fullname: Yu, Xiaoguang – sequence: 7 givenname: Shilai surname: Xing fullname: Xing, Shilai – sequence: 8 givenname: Fan surname: Lu fullname: Lu, Fan – sequence: 9 givenname: Xinjie orcidid: 0000-0001-9446-548X surname: Mao fullname: Mao, Xinjie |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40091069$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptks9q3DAQh01JadI0L9BDERRKL04lW9bKvYQl9E8gtFDasxjLo7VS2XIlbYofoO9dZTcNWSg-eDz-5kODfs-Lo8lPWBQvGT1nTIp3kVMhqpJWTUkpr0TJnxQnVZ2L3OJHj-rj4izGG0opY_lrVT0rjjmlLaOiPSn-rGP02kKyfoqkw_QbcSLfMH3BRDY4IZm9W0Yf5sHGMRKYepIGJGiM1aAX4g3xIQ3-JwZI3vnNQowPZFz8bIFoP6Xg3XsCJGCu4ow62Vsk2tkpCxyJadsvL4qnBlzEs_v3afHj44fvl5_L66-fri7X16XmXKZSGAMNZ0ZqgdCxlrFO1o2kkrX9yvS6ZTVlrdFGUkMzIEyXB2RX10JDjaI-La723t7DjZqDHSEsyoNVu4YPGwUhWe1QmYZKAGq6RlMuWNY1q67vQAMAUg7ZdbF3zdtuxF5j3hTcgfTwz2QHtfG3iuWDV6Li2fD23hD8ry3GpEYbNToHE_ptVDVbyUq2VDQZfb1HN5DPZifjs1Lf4Wota1ZLTiXN1Pl_qPz0ONp8FWhs7h8MvHk0MCC4NETvtrs0HIKvHi_7sOW_IGWg2gM6X3IMaB4QRtVdYNU-sConUu0Cq3j9FyHr37k |
Cites_doi | 10.1097/01.opx.0000232840.66716.af 10.1038/ncomms4517 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1487-23.2023 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.010 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.04.018 10.1167/iovs.15-17555 10.1038/eye.2013.280 10.1186/s12886-022-02294-1 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31825da339 10.1038/nature15393 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.303 10.1111/aos.14911 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.45821 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ea16ea 10.1167/iovs.14-14850 10.1038/ng2066 10.1038/nmeth0410-248 10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4 10.1038/s41588-018-0184-y 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 10.1016/j.clae.2019.11.012 10.1038/ng.548 10.1111/opo.12722 10.1167/iovs.13-12527 10.1038/s41588-019-0530-8 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.09.001 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.018 10.1038/s41422-020-0322-9 10.1093/nar/gkg509 10.1016/j.exer.2018.02.007 10.1172/JCI45627 10.1007/s10654-015-0010-0 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.004 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.011 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000493 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0444-23.2023 10.3389/fgene.2019.00736 10.1016/j.clae.2015.07.006 10.1111/opo.13070 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000034 10.1167/iovs.11-8453 10.1159/000510779 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182279cfa 10.1371/journal.pone.0175913 10.2471/BLT.07.041210 10.1167/iovs.10-5485 10.1086/519795 10.1167/iovs.12-9628 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.3451 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.015 10.1097/APO.0000000000000234 10.1038/s41598-019-49041-z 10.1038/ncb1706 10.1167/iovs.14-13935 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182357f79 10.1097/00006324-200010000-00009 10.1136/bjo-2021-321005 10.1001/archopht.123.7.977 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7 10.1167/iovs.12-10565 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.05.029 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.06.007 10.1038/s12276-018-0071-8 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000516 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004219 10.1167/iovs.14-14888 10.1093/nar/gky1016 10.1167/iovs.18-25967 10.1038/s41598-020-69710-8 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2025. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd. The Author(s) 2025 2025 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: The Author(s) 2025 2025 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s40662-025-00426-4 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 2326-0254 |
EndPage | 13 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_f508aa0fb5c04610ab57bdbacaaae04a PMC11912624 A831384080 40091069 10_1186_s40662_025_00426_4 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | China |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China |
GroupedDBID | 0R~ 5VS 7RV 7X7 8C1 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ABUWG ACGFS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS AQUVI ASPBG AVWKF BAPOH BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BKEYQ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION EBLON EBS EMOBN FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ HMCUK HYE IAO IEA IHR IHW ITC M0T M~E NAPCQ OK1 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC RBZ ROL RPM RSV SOJ UKHRP NPM PMFND 7X8 PPXIY 5PM PJZUB PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-6ffa541f8c6eab1911b83580819d7fdc913019fcf80f0ab16fbfa58b336ca3e63 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 2326-0254 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:30:07 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:33:48 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 04:11:39 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:57:20 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:58:43 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:23:40 EDT 2025 Thu Mar 20 02:21:27 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 05:19:03 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Myopia control WGS Orthokeratology Burden test Single-variant association analysis |
Language | English |
License | 2025. The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c448t-6ffa541f8c6eab1911b83580819d7fdc913019fcf80f0ab16fbfa58b336ca3e63 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-9446-548X |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/f508aa0fb5c04610ab57bdbacaaae04a |
PMID | 40091069 |
PQID | 3178289065 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f508aa0fb5c04610ab57bdbacaaae04a pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11912624 proquest_miscellaneous_3178289065 gale_infotracmisc_A831384080 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A831384080 gale_healthsolutions_A831384080 pubmed_primary_40091069 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40662_025_00426_4 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-03-17 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-03-17 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2025 text: 2025-03-17 day: 17 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Eye and vision (Novato, Calif.) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Eye Vis (Lond) |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | D Troilo (426_CR61) 2019; 60 W McLaren (426_CR26) 2016; 17 Y Liu (426_CR60) 2012; 53 S Poudel (426_CR66) 2024; 44 P Cho (426_CR15) 2012; 53 SM Saw (426_CR46) 2000; 77 P Cho (426_CR13) 2005; 30 S Lee (426_CR35) 2012; 91 K Jaganathan (426_CR31) 2019; 176 T Hiraoka (426_CR16) 2012; 53 Y Qi (426_CR17) 2022; 22 J Shen (426_CR20) 2010; 87 Y Cao (426_CR33) 2020; 30 KG Griffis (426_CR67) 2023; 43 ZB Jin (426_CR71) 2014; 5 S Wang (426_CR59) 2021; 64 KI Kendig (426_CR22) 2019; 10 MC Wu (426_CR34) 2011; 89 AC Fu (426_CR54) 2016; 39 EJ Lee (426_CR43) 2018; 44 KJ Karczewski (426_CR27) 2020; 581 W Lin (426_CR55) 2023; 43 J Santodomingo-Rubido (426_CR45) 2013; 90 Q Tan (426_CR58) 2020; 40 WN Charman (426_CR12) 2006; 83 PJ Foster (426_CR6) 2014; 28 R Chen (426_CR21) 2020; 43 Y Omori (426_CR72) 2008; 10 S Resnikoff (426_CR1) 2008; 86 X Yu (426_CR50) 2023; 6 N Kinoshita (426_CR57) 2020; 10 KM Williams (426_CR3) 2015; 122 P Kang (426_CR19) 2012; 89 W Sun (426_CR51) 2015; 56 KM Williams (426_CR2) 2015; 30 W Zhou (426_CR38) 2018; 50 EL Smith 3rd (426_CR62) 2011; 88 S Mechaussier (426_CR65) 2020; 106 P Rentzsch (426_CR30) 2019; 47 A Auton (426_CR25) 2015; 526 HM Kang (426_CR41) 2010; 42 426_CR32 CW Pan (426_CR5) 2015; 92 PC Ng (426_CR29) 2003; 31 K Boldt (426_CR70) 2011; 121 YL Wong (426_CR8) 2016; 5 L Zhou (426_CR52) 2018; 171 L Jiang (426_CR39) 2019; 51 L Hyman (426_CR47) 2005; 123 B Wang (426_CR53) 2017; 12 TY Wong (426_CR9) 2014; 157 T Kakita (426_CR14) 2011; 52 Y Hu (426_CR49) 2020; 138 B Hwang (426_CR37) 2018; 50 J Yang (426_CR40) 2011; 88 AI den Hollander (426_CR69) 2007; 39 C Lee (426_CR73) 2014; 55 JJ Walline (426_CR10) 2020; 1 TM Jakobsen (426_CR56) 2022; 100 H Li (426_CR23) 2009; 25 S Purcell (426_CR24) 2007; 81 IA Adzhubei (426_CR28) 2010; 7 Y Zhong (426_CR44) 2015; 56 IG Morgan (426_CR7) 2018; 62 KM Williams (426_CR4) 2009; 127 C Chen (426_CR42) 2013; 54 E Vallespin (426_CR68) 2010; 127 D Jiang (426_CR63) 2014; 56 CA de Leeuw (426_CR36) 2015; 11 L Donovan (426_CR48) 2012; 89 C Zeitz (426_CR64) 2015; 45 J Rappon (426_CR11) 2023; 107 AKC Lam (426_CR18) 2019; 9 |
References_xml | – volume: 83 start-page: 641 issue: 9 year: 2006 ident: 426_CR12 publication-title: Optom Vis Sci doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000232840.66716.af – volume: 5 start-page: 3517 year: 2014 ident: 426_CR71 publication-title: Nat Commun doi: 10.1038/ncomms4517 – volume: 44 start-page: e1487232023 issue: 3 year: 2024 ident: 426_CR66 publication-title: J Neurosci doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1487-23.2023 – volume: 157 start-page: 9 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 426_CR9 publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.010 – volume: 106 start-page: 859 issue: 6 year: 2020 ident: 426_CR65 publication-title: Am J Hum Genet doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.04.018 – volume: 56 start-page: 8365 issue: 13 year: 2015 ident: 426_CR51 publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17555 – volume: 28 start-page: 202 issue: 2 year: 2014 ident: 426_CR6 publication-title: Eye (Lond) doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.280 – volume: 22 start-page: 62 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 426_CR17 publication-title: BMC Ophthalmol doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02294-1 – volume: 89 start-page: 1014 issue: 7 year: 2012 ident: 426_CR19 publication-title: Optom Vis Sci doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31825da339 – volume: 526 start-page: 68 issue: 7571 year: 2015 ident: 426_CR25 publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/nature15393 – volume: 127 start-page: 1632 issue: 12 year: 2009 ident: 426_CR4 publication-title: Arch Ophthalmol doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.303 – volume: 100 start-page: 175 issue: 2 year: 2022 ident: 426_CR56 publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol doi: 10.1111/aos.14911 – volume: 6 start-page: e2345821 issue: 12 year: 2023 ident: 426_CR50 publication-title: JAMA Netw Open doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.45821 – volume: 87 start-page: 642 issue: 9 year: 2010 ident: 426_CR20 publication-title: Optom Vis Sci doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ea16ea – volume: 56 start-page: 339 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 426_CR63 publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14850 – volume: 39 start-page: 889 issue: 7 year: 2007 ident: 426_CR69 publication-title: Nat Genet doi: 10.1038/ng2066 – volume: 7 start-page: 248 issue: 4 year: 2010 ident: 426_CR28 publication-title: Nat Methods doi: 10.1038/nmeth0410-248 – volume: 17 start-page: 122 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 426_CR26 publication-title: Genome Biol doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4 – volume: 50 start-page: 1335 issue: 9 year: 2018 ident: 426_CR38 publication-title: Nat Genet doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0184-y – volume: 25 start-page: 1754 issue: 14 year: 2009 ident: 426_CR23 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 – volume: 43 start-page: 78 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 426_CR21 publication-title: Cont Lens Anterior Eye doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2019.11.012 – volume: 42 start-page: 348 issue: 4 year: 2010 ident: 426_CR41 publication-title: Nat Genet doi: 10.1038/ng.548 – volume: 40 start-page: 557 year: 2020 ident: 426_CR58 publication-title: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt doi: 10.1111/opo.12722 – volume: 54 start-page: 6510 issue: 10 year: 2013 ident: 426_CR42 publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12527 – volume: 1 start-page: CD004916 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 426_CR10 publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 51 start-page: 1749 issue: 12 year: 2019 ident: 426_CR39 publication-title: Nat Genet doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0530-8 – volume: 45 start-page: 58 year: 2015 ident: 426_CR64 publication-title: Prog Retin Eye Res doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.09.001 – volume: 122 start-page: 1489 issue: 7 year: 2015 ident: 426_CR3 publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.018 – ident: 426_CR32 – volume: 30 start-page: 717 issue: 9 year: 2020 ident: 426_CR33 publication-title: Cell Res doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0322-9 – volume: 31 start-page: 3812 issue: 13 year: 2003 ident: 426_CR29 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg509 – volume: 171 start-page: 76 year: 2018 ident: 426_CR52 publication-title: Exp Eye Res doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.02.007 – volume: 127 start-page: 487 issue: 4 year: 2010 ident: 426_CR68 publication-title: Hum Genet – volume: 121 start-page: 2169 issue: 6 year: 2011 ident: 426_CR70 publication-title: J Clin Invest doi: 10.1172/JCI45627 – volume: 30 start-page: 305 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: 426_CR2 publication-title: Eur J Epidemiol doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0010-0 – volume: 62 start-page: 134 year: 2018 ident: 426_CR7 publication-title: Prog Retin Eye Res doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.004 – volume: 88 start-page: 76 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 426_CR40 publication-title: Am J Hum Genet doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.011 – volume: 44 start-page: 292 issue: 5 year: 2018 ident: 426_CR43 publication-title: Eye Contact Lens doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000493 – volume: 43 start-page: 4379 issue: 24 year: 2023 ident: 426_CR67 publication-title: J Neurosci doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0444-23.2023 – volume: 10 start-page: 736 year: 2019 ident: 426_CR22 publication-title: Front Genet doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00736 – volume: 39 start-page: 62 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 426_CR54 publication-title: Cont Lens Anterior Eye doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2015.07.006 – volume: 43 start-page: 122 issue: 1 year: 2023 ident: 426_CR55 publication-title: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt doi: 10.1111/opo.13070 – volume: 90 start-page: 1225 issue: 11 year: 2013 ident: 426_CR45 publication-title: Optom Vis Sci doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000034 – volume: 53 start-page: 3913 issue: 7 year: 2012 ident: 426_CR16 publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8453 – volume: 64 start-page: 723 issue: 5 year: 2021 ident: 426_CR59 publication-title: Ophthalmic Res doi: 10.1159/000510779 – volume: 88 start-page: 1029 issue: 9 year: 2011 ident: 426_CR62 publication-title: Optom Vis Sci doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182279cfa – volume: 12 start-page: e0175913 issue: 4 year: 2017 ident: 426_CR53 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175913 – volume: 86 start-page: 63 issue: 1 year: 2008 ident: 426_CR1 publication-title: Bull World Health Organ doi: 10.2471/BLT.07.041210 – volume: 52 start-page: 2170 issue: 5 year: 2011 ident: 426_CR14 publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5485 – volume: 81 start-page: 559 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: 426_CR24 publication-title: Am J Hum Genet doi: 10.1086/519795 – volume: 53 start-page: 5085 issue: 8 year: 2012 ident: 426_CR60 publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9628 – volume: 138 start-page: 1129 issue: 11 year: 2020 ident: 426_CR49 publication-title: JAMA Ophthalmol doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.3451 – volume: 176 start-page: 535 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: 426_CR31 publication-title: Cell doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.015 – volume: 5 start-page: 394 issue: 6 year: 2016 ident: 426_CR8 publication-title: Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000234 – volume: 9 start-page: 12566 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 426_CR18 publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49041-z – volume: 10 start-page: 437 issue: 4 year: 2008 ident: 426_CR72 publication-title: Nat Cell Biol doi: 10.1038/ncb1706 – volume: 56 start-page: 4514 issue: 8 year: 2015 ident: 426_CR44 publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-13935 – volume: 89 start-page: 27 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: 426_CR48 publication-title: Optom Vis Sci doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182357f79 – volume: 77 start-page: 549 issue: 10 year: 2000 ident: 426_CR46 publication-title: Optom Vis Sci doi: 10.1097/00006324-200010000-00009 – volume: 107 start-page: 1709 issue: 11 year: 2023 ident: 426_CR11 publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1136/bjo-2021-321005 – volume: 30 start-page: 71 issue: 1 year: 2005 ident: 426_CR13 publication-title: Optom Vis Sci – volume: 123 start-page: 977 issue: 7 year: 2005 ident: 426_CR47 publication-title: Arch Ophthalmol doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.7.977 – volume: 581 start-page: 434 issue: 7809 year: 2020 ident: 426_CR27 publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7 – volume: 53 start-page: 7077 issue: 11 year: 2012 ident: 426_CR15 publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10565 – volume: 89 start-page: 82 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 426_CR34 publication-title: Am J Hum Genet doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.05.029 – volume: 91 start-page: 224 issue: 2 year: 2012 ident: 426_CR35 publication-title: Am J Hum Genet doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.06.007 – volume: 50 start-page: 1 issue: 8 year: 2018 ident: 426_CR37 publication-title: Exp Mol Med doi: 10.1038/s12276-018-0071-8 – volume: 92 start-page: 258 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 426_CR5 publication-title: Optom Vis Sci doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000516 – volume: 11 start-page: e1004219 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: 426_CR36 publication-title: PLoS Comput Biol doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004219 – volume: 55 start-page: 4585 issue: 7 year: 2014 ident: 426_CR73 publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14888 – volume: 47 start-page: D886 issue: D1 year: 2019 ident: 426_CR30 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1016 – volume: 60 start-page: M31 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: 426_CR61 publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-25967 – volume: 10 start-page: 12750 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 426_CR57 publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69710-8 |
SSID | ssj0001125472 |
Score | 2.2865703 |
Snippet | This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia.
A retrospective clinical study was... Background This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia. Methods A retrospective... This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia. A retrospective clinical study was... This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia.BACKGROUNDThis study investigated how... Abstract Background This study investigated how clinical and genetic factors impact the effectiveness of orthokeratology lenses in myopia. Methods A... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 13 |
SubjectTerms | Anopheles Burden test Clinical trials Genes Genetic aspects Genetic polymorphisms Genomes Genomics Medical genetics Myopia Myopia control Orthokeratology Single-variant association analysis WGS |
Title | Associations between RetNet gene polymorphisms and the efficacy of orthokeratology for myopia control: a retrospective clinical study |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40091069 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3178289065 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11912624 https://doaj.org/article/f508aa0fb5c04610ab57bdbacaaae04a |
Volume | 12 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3fb9MwED7BkBAvCDZ-BEYxEoIHFK1OHMflLZs2TZVWocGkvlm2Y2sVNKmW7KF_AP83ZyetEvHACy9pVLtR7bvLfWfffQb4mDhdpqWgseOZiRn62Fi7ksbKac1d7oRQfkf3asEvb9h8mS0HR335nLCOHribuBOHCEKpqdOZCdzgSme5LrUySik7ZQEaoc8bBFNhdQX9NsuTXZWM4CcN81znsT-9NcQNMRt5okDY__dreeCXxjmTAyd08Qye9uiRFN2_fg4PbHUIR0WFkfN6Sz6RkM8ZFsoP4fFVv21-BL8HQmhIn5pFrm27sC1BDbJkU__armuc81WzboiqSoLAkFjPL6HMltSO-P2d-qenYA7PJwh2yXpbb1aK9OnuX4kidxbvdtWbZFd2SQKJ7Qu4uTj_cXYZ9-cvxAaDtjbmzqmMUScMt0pjYEe18LumCCLK3JVmhv6PzpxxYupQLpQ7jT8QOk25Uanl6Us4qOrKvgaihMc1nluGCVY6KgxqSOooNXwmcm0i-LKThdx0NBsyhCeCy05yEiUng-Qki-DUi2vf01Nkhy9QcWSvOPJfihPBey9s2dWb7g1dFiKlKYa9YhrB59DDmzrKHOe7q1jAIXnSrFHP41FPNFEzav6wUyjpm3xeW2Xr-0YievMhL-LACF51CrYfFb5dEcvxWQRipHqjYY9bqtVtYAj3rH0JT9ib_zFRb-FJEszGc9kew0F7d2_fIRJr9QQe5sscr-KMTuBRUcy_z_Hz9Hzx7XoSDPIPVYg68A |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Associations+between+RetNet+gene+polymorphisms+and+the+efficacy+of+orthokeratology+for+myopia+control%3A+a+retrospective+clinical+study&rft.jtitle=Eye+and+vision+%28Novato%2C+Calif.%29&rft.au=Xia%2C+Ruijing&rft.au=Yu%2C+Xiangyi&rft.au=Wu%2C+Hao&rft.au=Peng%2C+Lulu&rft.date=2025-03-17&rft.issn=2326-0254&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs40662-025-00426-4&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2326-0254&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2326-0254&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2326-0254&client=summon |