Delivering safe and effective analgesia for management of renal colic in the emergency department: a double-blind, multigroup, randomised controlled trial

Summary Background The excruciating pain of patients with renal colic on presentation to the emergency department requires effective analgesia to be administered in the shortest possible time. Trials comparing intramuscular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with intravenous opioids or paracetamo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Lancet (British edition) Vol. 387; no. 10032; pp. 1999 - 2007
Main Authors Pathan, Sameer A, Dr, Mitra, Biswadev, PhD, Straney, Lahn D, PhD, Afzal, Muhammad Shuaib, CABEM, Anjum, Shahzad, CABEM, Shukla, Dharmesh, MD, Morley, Kostantinos, FRCEM, Hilli, Shatha A Al, FRCR, Rumaihi, Khalid Al, FEBU, Thomas, Stephen H, Prof, Cameron, Peter A, Prof
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 14.05.2016
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Summary Background The excruciating pain of patients with renal colic on presentation to the emergency department requires effective analgesia to be administered in the shortest possible time. Trials comparing intramuscular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with intravenous opioids or paracetamol have been inconclusive because of the challenges associated with concealment of randomisation, small sample size, differences in outcome measures, and inadequate masking of participants and assessors. We did this trial to develop definitive evidence regarding the choice of initial analgesia and route of administration in participants presenting with renal colic to the emergency department. Methods In this three-treatment group, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, adult participants (aged 18–65 years) presenting to the emergency department of an academic, tertiary care hospital in Qatar, with moderate to severe renal colic (Numerical pain Rating Scale ≥4) were recruited. With the use of computer-generated block randomisation (block sizes of six and nine), participants were assigned (1:1:1) to receive diclofenac (75 mg/3 mL intramuscular), morphine (0·1 mg/kg intravenous), or paracetamol (1 g/100 mL intravenous). Participants, clinicians, and trial personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants achieving at least a 50% reduction in initial pain score at 30 min after analgesia, assessed by intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis, which included patients where a calculus in the urinary tract was detected with imaging. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02187614. Findings Between Aug 5, 2014, and March 15, 2015, we randomly assigned 1645 participants, of whom 1644 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (547 in the diclofenac group, 548 in the paracetemol group, and 549 in the morphine group). Ureteric calculi were detected in 1316 patients, who were analysed as the per-protocol population (438 in the diclofenac group, 435 in the paracetemol group, and 443 in the morphine group). The primary outcome was achieved in 371 (68%) patients in the diclofenac group, 364 (66%) in the paracetamol group, and 335 (61%) in the morphine group in the intention-to-treat population. Compared to morphine, diclofenac was significantly more effective in achieving the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR] 1·35, 95% CI 1·05–1·73, p=0·0187), whereas no difference was detected in the effectiveness of morphine compared with intravenous paracetamol (1·26, 0·99–1·62, p=0·0629). In the per-protocol population, diclofenac (OR 1·49, 95% CI 1·13–1·97, p=0·0046) and paracetamol (1·40, 1·06–1·85, p=0·0166) were more effective than morphine in achieving the primary outcome. Acute adverse events in the morphine group occurred in 19 (3%) participants. Significantly lower numbers of adverse events were recorded in the diclofenac group (7 [1%] participants, OR 0·31, 95% CI 0·12–0·78, p=0·0088) and paracetamol group (7 [1%] participants, 0·36, 0·15–0·87, p=0·0175) than in the morphine group. During the 2 week follow-up, no additional adverse events were noted in any group. Interpretation Intramuscular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs offer the most effective sustained analgesia for renal colic in the emergency department and seem to have fewer side-effects. Funding Hamad Medical Corporation Medical Research Center, Doha, Qatar.
AbstractList BACKGROUNDThe excruciating pain of patients with renal colic on presentation to the emergency department requires effective analgesia to be administered in the shortest possible time. Trials comparing intramuscular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with intravenous opioids or paracetamol have been inconclusive because of the challenges associated with concealment of randomisation, small sample size, differences in outcome measures, and inadequate masking of participants and assessors. We did this trial to develop definitive evidence regarding the choice of initial analgesia and route of administration in participants presenting with renal colic to the emergency department.METHODSIn this three-treatment group, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, adult participants (aged 18-65 years) presenting to the emergency department of an academic, tertiary care hospital in Qatar, with moderate to severe renal colic (Numerical pain Rating Scale ≥ 4) were recruited. With the use of computer-generated block randomisation (block sizes of six and nine), participants were assigned (1:1:1) to receive diclofenac (75 mg/3 mL intramuscular), morphine (0.1 mg/kg intravenous), or paracetamol (1 g/100 mL intravenous). Participants, clinicians, and trial personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants achieving at least a 50% reduction in initial pain score at 30 min after analgesia, assessed by intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis, which included patients where a calculus in the urinary tract was detected with imaging. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02187614.FINDINGSBetween Aug 5, 2014, and March 15, 2015, we randomly assigned 1645 participants, of whom 1644 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (547 in the diclofenac group, 548 in the paracetemol group, and 549 in the morphine group). Ureteric calculi were detected in 1316 patients, who were analysed as the per-protocol population (438 in the diclofenac group, 435 in the paracetemol group, and 443 in the morphine group). The primary outcome was achieved in 371 (68%) patients in the diclofenac group, 364 (66%) in the paracetamol group, and 335 (61%) in the morphine group in the intention-to-treat population. Compared to morphine, diclofenac was significantly more effective in achieving the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR] 1·35, 95% CI 1·05-1·73, p=0·0187), whereas no difference was detected in the effectiveness of morphine compared with intravenous paracetamol (1·26, 0·99-1·62, p=0·0629). In the per-protocol population, diclofenac (OR 1·49, 95% CI 1·13-1·97, p=0·0046) and paracetamol (1·40, 1·06-1·85, p=0·0166) were more effective than morphine in achieving the primary outcome. Acute adverse events in the morphine group occurred in 19 (3%) participants. Significantly lower numbers of adverse events were recorded in the diclofenac group (7 [1%] participants, OR 0·31, 95% CI 0·12-0·78, p=0·0088) and paracetamol group (7 [1%] participants, 0·36, 0·15-0·87, p=0·0175) than in the morphine group. During the 2 week follow-up, no additional adverse events were noted in any group.INTERPRETATIONIntramuscular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs offer the most effective sustained analgesia for renal colic in the emergency department and seem to have fewer side-effects.FUNDINGHamad Medical Corporation Medical Research Center, Doha, Qatar.
The excruciating pain of patients with renal colic on presentation to the emergency department requires effective analgesia to be administered in the shortest possible time. Trials comparing intramuscular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with intravenous opioids or paracetamol have been inconclusive because of the challenges associated with concealment of randomisation, small sample size, differences in outcome measures, and inadequate masking of participants and assessors. We did this trial to develop definitive evidence regarding the choice of initial analgesia and route of administration in participants presenting with renal colic to the emergency department. In this three-treatment group, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, adult participants (aged 18-65 years) presenting to the emergency department of an academic, tertiary care hospital in Qatar, with moderate to severe renal colic (Numerical pain Rating Scale ≥ 4) were recruited. With the use of computer-generated block randomisation (block sizes of six and nine), participants were assigned (1:1:1) to receive diclofenac (75 mg/3 mL intramuscular), morphine (0.1 mg/kg intravenous), or paracetamol (1 g/100 mL intravenous). Participants, clinicians, and trial personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants achieving at least a 50% reduction in initial pain score at 30 min after analgesia, assessed by intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis, which included patients where a calculus in the urinary tract was detected with imaging. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02187614. Between Aug 5, 2014, and March 15, 2015, we randomly assigned 1645 participants, of whom 1644 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (547 in the diclofenac group, 548 in the paracetemol group, and 549 in the morphine group). Ureteric calculi were detected in 1316 patients, who were analysed as the per-protocol population (438 in the diclofenac group, 435 in the paracetemol group, and 443 in the morphine group). The primary outcome was achieved in 371 (68%) patients in the diclofenac group, 364 (66%) in the paracetamol group, and 335 (61%) in the morphine group in the intention-to-treat population. Compared to morphine, diclofenac was significantly more effective in achieving the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR] 1·35, 95% CI 1·05-1·73, p=0·0187), whereas no difference was detected in the effectiveness of morphine compared with intravenous paracetamol (1·26, 0·99-1·62, p=0·0629). In the per-protocol population, diclofenac (OR 1·49, 95% CI 1·13-1·97, p=0·0046) and paracetamol (1·40, 1·06-1·85, p=0·0166) were more effective than morphine in achieving the primary outcome. Acute adverse events in the morphine group occurred in 19 (3%) participants. Significantly lower numbers of adverse events were recorded in the diclofenac group (7 [1%] participants, OR 0·31, 95% CI 0·12-0·78, p=0·0088) and paracetamol group (7 [1%] participants, 0·36, 0·15-0·87, p=0·0175) than in the morphine group. During the 2 week follow-up, no additional adverse events were noted in any group. Intramuscular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs offer the most effective sustained analgesia for renal colic in the emergency department and seem to have fewer side-effects. Hamad Medical Corporation Medical Research Center, Doha, Qatar.
The excruciating pain of patients with renal colic on presentation to the emergency department requires effective analgesia to be administered in the shortest possible time. Trials comparing intramuscular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with intravenous opioids or paracetamol have been inconclusive because of the challenges associated with concealment of randomisation, small sample size, differences in outcome measures, and inadequate masking of participants and assessors. We did this trial to develop definitive evidence regarding the choice of initial analgesia and route of administration in participants presenting with renal colic to the emergency department. In this three-treatment group, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, adult participants (aged 18–65 years) presenting to the emergency department of an academic, tertiary care hospital in Qatar, with moderate to severe renal colic (Numerical pain Rating Scale ≥4) were recruited. With the use of computer-generated block randomisation (block sizes of six and nine), participants were assigned (1:1:1) to receive diclofenac (75 mg/3 mL intramuscular), morphine (0·1 mg/kg intravenous), or paracetamol (1 g/100 mL intravenous). Participants, clinicians, and trial personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants achieving at least a 50% reduction in initial pain score at 30 min after analgesia, assessed by intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis, which included patients where a calculus in the urinary tract was detected with imaging. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02187614. Between Aug 5, 2014, and March 15, 2015, we randomly assigned 1645 participants, of whom 1644 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (547 in the diclofenac group, 548 in the paracetemol group, and 549 in the morphine group). Ureteric calculi were detected in 1316 patients, who were analysed as the per-protocol population (438 in the diclofenac group, 435 in the paracetemol group, and 443 in the morphine group). The primary outcome was achieved in 371 (68%) patients in the diclofenac group, 364 (66%) in the paracetamol group, and 335 (61%) in the morphine group in the intention-to-treat population. Compared to morphine, diclofenac was significantly more effective in achieving the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR] 1·35, 95% CI 1·05–1·73, p=0·0187), whereas no difference was detected in the effectiveness of morphine compared with intravenous paracetamol (1·26, 0·99–1·62, p=0·0629). In the per-protocol population, diclofenac (OR 1·49, 95% CI 1·13–1·97, p=0·0046) and paracetamol (1·40, 1·06–1·85, p=0·0166) were more effective than morphine in achieving the primary outcome. Acute adverse events in the morphine group occurred in 19 (3%) participants. Significantly lower numbers of adverse events were recorded in the diclofenac group (7 [1%] participants, OR 0·31, 95% CI 0·12–0·78, p=0·0088) and paracetamol group (7 [1%] participants, 0·36, 0·15–0·87, p=0·0175) than in the morphine group. During the 2 week follow-up, no additional adverse events were noted in any group. Intramuscular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs offer the most effective sustained analgesia for renal colic in the emergency department and seem to have fewer side-effects. Hamad Medical Corporation Medical Research Center, Doha, Qatar.
The excruciating pain of patients with renal colic on presentation to the emergency department requires effective analgesia to be administered in the shortest possible time. Trials comparing intramuscular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with intravenous opioids or paracetamol have been inconclusive because of the challenges associated with concealment of randomisation, small sample size, differences in outcome measures, and inadequate masking of participants and assessors. We did this trial to develop definitive evidence regarding the choice of initial analgesia and route of administration in participants presenting with renal colic to the emergency department. Methods In this three-treatment group, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, adult participants (aged 18-65 years) presenting to the emergency department of an academic, tertiary care hospital in Qatar, with moderate to severe renal colic (Numerical pain Rating Scale >=4) were recruited. With the use of computer-generated block randomisation (block sizes of six and nine), participants were assigned (1:1:1) to receive diclofenac (75 mg/3 mL intramuscular), morphine (0·1 mg/kg intravenous), or paracetamol (1 g/100 mL intravenous). Participants, clinicians, and trial personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants achieving at least a 50% reduction in initial pain score at 30 min after analgesia, assessed by intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis, which included patients where a calculus in the urinary tract was detected with imaging. This trial is registered withClinicalTrials.gov, numberNCT02187614. Findings Between Aug 5, 2014, and March 15, 2015, we randomly assigned 1645 participants, of whom 1644 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (547 in the diclofenac group, 548 in the paracetemol group, and 549 in the morphine group). Ureteric calculi were detected in 1316 patients, who were analysed as the per-protocol population (438 in the diclofenac group, 435 in the paracetemol group, and 443 in the morphine group). The primary outcome was achieved in 371 (68%) patients in the diclofenac group, 364 (66%) in the paracetamol group, and 335 (61%) in the morphine group in the intention-to-treat population. Compared to morphine, diclofenac was significantly more effective in achieving the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR] 1·35, 95% CI 1·05-1·73, p=0·0187), whereas no difference was detected in the effectiveness of morphine compared with intravenous paracetamol (1·26, 0·99-1·62, p=0·0629). In the per-protocol population, diclofenac (OR 1·49, 95% CI 1·13-1·97, p=0·0046) and paracetamol (1·40, 1·06-1·85, p=0·0166) were more effective than morphine in achieving the primary outcome. Acute adverse events in the morphine group occurred in 19 (3%) participants. Significantly lower numbers of adverse events were recorded in the diclofenac group (7 [1%] participants, OR 0·31, 95% CI 0·12-0·78, p=0·0088) and paracetamol group (7 [1%] participants, 0·36, 0·15-0·87, p=0·0175) than in the morphine group. During the 2 week follow-up, no additional adverse events were noted in any group. Interpretation Intramuscular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs offer the most effective sustained analgesia for renal colic in the emergency department and seem to have fewer side-effects. Funding Hamad Medical Corporation Medical Research Center, Doha, Qatar.
Summary Background The excruciating pain of patients with renal colic on presentation to the emergency department requires effective analgesia to be administered in the shortest possible time. Trials comparing intramuscular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with intravenous opioids or paracetamol have been inconclusive because of the challenges associated with concealment of randomisation, small sample size, differences in outcome measures, and inadequate masking of participants and assessors. We did this trial to develop definitive evidence regarding the choice of initial analgesia and route of administration in participants presenting with renal colic to the emergency department. Methods In this three-treatment group, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, adult participants (aged 18–65 years) presenting to the emergency department of an academic, tertiary care hospital in Qatar, with moderate to severe renal colic (Numerical pain Rating Scale ≥4) were recruited. With the use of computer-generated block randomisation (block sizes of six and nine), participants were assigned (1:1:1) to receive diclofenac (75 mg/3 mL intramuscular), morphine (0·1 mg/kg intravenous), or paracetamol (1 g/100 mL intravenous). Participants, clinicians, and trial personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants achieving at least a 50% reduction in initial pain score at 30 min after analgesia, assessed by intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis, which included patients where a calculus in the urinary tract was detected with imaging. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02187614. Findings Between Aug 5, 2014, and March 15, 2015, we randomly assigned 1645 participants, of whom 1644 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (547 in the diclofenac group, 548 in the paracetemol group, and 549 in the morphine group). Ureteric calculi were detected in 1316 patients, who were analysed as the per-protocol population (438 in the diclofenac group, 435 in the paracetemol group, and 443 in the morphine group). The primary outcome was achieved in 371 (68%) patients in the diclofenac group, 364 (66%) in the paracetamol group, and 335 (61%) in the morphine group in the intention-to-treat population. Compared to morphine, diclofenac was significantly more effective in achieving the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR] 1·35, 95% CI 1·05–1·73, p=0·0187), whereas no difference was detected in the effectiveness of morphine compared with intravenous paracetamol (1·26, 0·99–1·62, p=0·0629). In the per-protocol population, diclofenac (OR 1·49, 95% CI 1·13–1·97, p=0·0046) and paracetamol (1·40, 1·06–1·85, p=0·0166) were more effective than morphine in achieving the primary outcome. Acute adverse events in the morphine group occurred in 19 (3%) participants. Significantly lower numbers of adverse events were recorded in the diclofenac group (7 [1%] participants, OR 0·31, 95% CI 0·12–0·78, p=0·0088) and paracetamol group (7 [1%] participants, 0·36, 0·15–0·87, p=0·0175) than in the morphine group. During the 2 week follow-up, no additional adverse events were noted in any group. Interpretation Intramuscular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs offer the most effective sustained analgesia for renal colic in the emergency department and seem to have fewer side-effects. Funding Hamad Medical Corporation Medical Research Center, Doha, Qatar.
Author Rumaihi, Khalid Al, FEBU
Straney, Lahn D, PhD
Mitra, Biswadev, PhD
Anjum, Shahzad, CABEM
Morley, Kostantinos, FRCEM
Thomas, Stephen H, Prof
Pathan, Sameer A, Dr
Shukla, Dharmesh, MD
Hilli, Shatha A Al, FRCR
Cameron, Peter A, Prof
Afzal, Muhammad Shuaib, CABEM
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Pathan, Sameer A, Dr
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Mitra, Biswadev, PhD
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Straney, Lahn D, PhD
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Afzal, Muhammad Shuaib, CABEM
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Anjum, Shahzad, CABEM
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Shukla, Dharmesh, MD
– sequence: 7
  fullname: Morley, Kostantinos, FRCEM
– sequence: 8
  fullname: Hilli, Shatha A Al, FRCR
– sequence: 9
  fullname: Rumaihi, Khalid Al, FEBU
– sequence: 10
  fullname: Thomas, Stephen H, Prof
– sequence: 11
  fullname: Cameron, Peter A, Prof
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26993881$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkc-OFCEQxolZ486uPoKGxMuabCsM0NAeNGb9m2ziQU28EZouRlYaRujeZF7Fp5WZXtdkL56gqF99RdV3go5iioDQY0qeU0LbF18I5aRpJWvPaPuMkFasG3UPrSiXvBFcfj9Cq1vkGJ2UckUI4S0RD9Dxuu06phRdod9vIfhryD5ucDEOsIkDBufATvW5RiZsoHiDXcp4rOEGRogTTg5nqElsU_AW-4inH4BrLm8g2h0eYGvytEdfYoOHNPcBmj74OJzjcQ6T3-Q0b89xrv3S6AsMVSlOOYVQr1P2JjxE950JBR7dnKfo2_t3Xy8-NpefP3y6eHPZWM7V1HAhuZPS2bZn0sk61gASlHOiY5Q62vU96QUXTAlhKaM9EWxtespUR60aDDtFZ4vuNqdfM5RJ1_9YCMFESHPRVHaEi5YJWtGnd9CrNOe6hoWidddKVkoslM2plAxOb7MfTd5pSvTePH0wT--d0TU6mKdVrXtyoz73Iwy3VX_dqsDrBYC6jmsPWRfr67ph8Lkapofk_9vi1R0FWz3x1oSfsIPybxpd1posInsN2h4UFPsDVjLBUg
CODEN LANCAO
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1186_s13063_021_05600_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_16_31496_9
crossref_primary_10_1002_art_41584
crossref_primary_10_1002_art_41663
crossref_primary_10_1093_ajhp_zxaa178
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_purol_2017_05_011
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2023_0266
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2020_01_017
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_16_31494_5
crossref_primary_10_4274_eajem_galenos_2022_20633
crossref_primary_10_4103_ua_ua_120_23
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2022_0741
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2018_01_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_imr_2024_101021
crossref_primary_10_1080_11101849_2022_2079894
crossref_primary_10_1136_emermed_2017_206787
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2020_0835
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11255_016_1479_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2018_09_004
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00240_017_0997_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_purol_2023_08_018
crossref_primary_10_1093_pm_pnaa240
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_020_03319_4
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2022_25735
crossref_primary_10_1080_11101849_2022_2127649
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2020_08_063
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000001173
crossref_primary_10_1111_acem_13432
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2020_0402
crossref_primary_10_2147_JPR_S339006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2021_05_056
crossref_primary_10_1136_emermed_2022_212869
crossref_primary_10_1007_s41973_020_00097_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2022_02_044
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_16_00745_5
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2021_728908
crossref_primary_10_1080_14656566_2021_1901885
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_med_2019_10_003
crossref_primary_10_2174_1574887114666191118153600
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10153420
crossref_primary_10_51894_001c_7210
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11255_020_02686_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2017_01_026
crossref_primary_10_1155_2017_3464693
crossref_primary_10_3166_s13341_017_0809_2
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000023279
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_024_04813_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2020_12_017
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2023_08_029
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_annemergmed_2017_12_014
crossref_primary_10_1111_iju_13957
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11298_016_5732_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2018_08_040
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00228_018_2416_6
crossref_primary_10_1111_ijcp_13969
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e28448
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12245_017_0160_9
crossref_primary_10_5812_aapm_86963
crossref_primary_10_1080_10903127_2019_1657213
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2020_01_049
crossref_primary_10_1007_s15006_016_8721_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_annemergmed_2018_06_019
crossref_primary_10_1097_MJT_0000000000001098
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40122_023_00530_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eururo_2017_11_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcjq_2019_07_008
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11596_019_2005_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2017_09_019
crossref_primary_10_4103_jrpp_jrpp_11_24
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2019_00096
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jemermed_2021_09_002
crossref_primary_10_1136_emermed_2018_208214
crossref_primary_10_1097_MJT_0000000000000526
crossref_primary_10_1080_21681805_2018_1428682
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.013
10.1016/j.ajem.2009.09.019
10.1155/2014/571326
10.1001/archinte.1994.00420120113012
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016
10.1016/j.acpain.2006.11.004
10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.007
10.1371/journal.pone.0004439
10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05083.x
10.1007/s002280050492
10.5505/tjtes.2013.86383
10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460211.x
10.2174/1876542401104010009
10.1093/bja/88.2.227
10.1016/S0735-6757(99)90003-7
10.1002/14651858.CD006027.pub2
10.1097/MJT.0b013e318274db78
10.4103/1319-2442.152557
10.1345/aph.1P438
10.1136/bmj.326.7387.502
10.1016/j.ajem.2015.02.033
10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01608.x
10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90055-8
10.1136/emermed-2011-200165
10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.098
10.1155/2013/583132
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.06.501
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.030
10.1210/jc.2011-3492
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Elsevier Ltd
2016 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright Elsevier Limited May 14, 2016
Copyright_xml – notice: Elsevier Ltd
– notice: 2016 Elsevier Ltd
– notice: Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
– notice: Copyright Elsevier Limited May 14, 2016
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
0TT
0TZ
0U~
3V.
7QL
7QP
7RV
7TK
7U7
7U9
7X7
7XB
88A
88C
88E
88G
88I
8AF
8AO
8C1
8C2
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8G5
ABUWG
AFKRA
AN0
ASE
AZQEC
BBNVY
BEC
BENPR
BHPHI
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
FPQ
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
GUQSH
H94
HCIFZ
K6X
K9-
K9.
KB0
KB~
LK8
M0R
M0S
M0T
M1P
M2M
M2O
M2P
M7N
M7P
MBDVC
NAPCQ
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PSYQQ
Q9U
S0X
7X8
DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
News PRO
Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO
Global News & ABI/Inform Professional
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
Neurosciences Abstracts
Toxicology Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Biology Database (Alumni Edition)
Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Psychology Database (Alumni)
Science Database (Alumni Edition)
STEM Database
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Public Health Database (Proquest)
Lancet Titles
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
British Nursing Database
British Nursing Index
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
eLibrary
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
Research Library Prep
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
SciTech Premium Collection
British Nursing Index
Consumer Health Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Newsstand Professional
Biological Sciences
Family Health Database (Proquest)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
Health Management Database (Proquest)
Medical Database
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
ProQuest research library
Science Database (ProQuest)
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biological Science Database
Research Library (Corporate)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Basic
SIRS Editorial
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
ProQuest One Psychology
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
News PRO
ProQuest Central Essentials
Lancet Titles
elibrary
ProQuest AP Science
SciTech Premium Collection
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Global News & ABI/Inform Professional
Health Research Premium Collection
Natural Science Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Newsstand Professional
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Family Health
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO
SIRS Editorial
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Family Health (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Biology Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Public Health
ProQuest Central Basic
Toxicology Abstracts
ProQuest Science Journals
British Nursing Index with Full Text
ProQuest Health Management
British Nursing Index
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest Psychology Journals
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE

ProQuest One Psychology

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1474-547X
EndPage 2007
ExternalDocumentID 4062994671
10_1016_S0140_6736_16_00652_8
26993881
S0140673616006528
1_s2_0_S0140673616006528
Genre Multicenter Study
Comparative Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Qatar
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Qatar
GrantInformation Hamad Medical Corporation Medical Research Center, Doha, Qatar.
GroupedDBID -
04C
08R
0R
1-
123
1B1
1P
1RT
1~5
29L
3EH
3O-
3V.
4.4
41
457
4G.
53G
55
5VS
7-5
71M
7RV
7X7
88A
88E
88I
8AF
8AO
8C1
8C2
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8G5
8WZ
9JM
A6W
AABNK
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEJM
AAIKJ
AAKAS
AAKOC
AALRI
AALRV
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAXUO
AAYOK
ABBQC
ABDBF
ABFLS
ABFNM
ABIVO
ABLJU
ABLVK
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABOCM
ABTAH
ABUWG
ABWYI
ABYKQ
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACIUM
ACPRK
ACRLP
ACRZS
ADBBV
ADZCM
AEKER
AENEX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFKRA
AFKWA
AFRAH
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGAPS
AGHFR
AHHHB
AHMBA
AITUG
AJBFU
AJJEV
AJOXV
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKVCP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
AN0
ANZVX
AQUVI
ARTTT
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
AZQEC
BBAFP
BBNVY
BCU
BEC
BENPR
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BKNYI
BKOJK
BKOMP
BNPGV
BNQBC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CO
CS3
D0S
DU5
DWQXO
EAP
EAS
EAU
EAZ
EBC
EBD
EBS
EBU
EFJIC
EGS
EHN
EIHBH
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ENC
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
EPL
EPS
EPT
ESX
EVS
EWM
EX3
F5P
FD8
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FO
FYUFA
G-2
G-Q
G0
G8K
GBLVA
GJ
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HCIFZ
HVGLF
HZ
IHE
IPNFZ
J1W
J5H
K
K-O
K9-
KOM
L7B
LK8
LZ2
M
M0L
M0R
M0T
M1P
M2M
M2O
M2P
M41
M7P
MJL
MO0
MVM
N9A
NAPCQ
O-L
O9-
OD.
OO
OVD
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRG
PROAC
PSQYO
Q~Q
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
S0X
SAD
SDF
SDG
SEL
SES
SJFOW
SJN
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
SV3
T5K
TEORI
TLN
TWZ
UAP
UBE
UHU
UQL
UV1
WOQ
WOW
WUQ
X7M
XAX
XDU
XFK
XPP
YXB
YYQ
Z5R
ZA5
ZGI
ZMT
ZXP
ZY4
---
--K
--M
.1-
.55
.CO
.FO
0R~
1P~
AAEDW
ABCQX
ABJNI
AHPSJ
AXJTR
CCPQU
FYGXN
HMCUK
OO~
PSYQQ
UKHRP
YYM
AAMRU
AAXKI
AFCTW
AKRWK
ALIPV
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
.GJ
41~
AAYXX
ADMUD
CITATION
HZ~
TH9
~G0
0TT
0TZ
0U~
7QL
7QP
7TK
7U7
7U9
7XB
8FK
ASE
C1K
FPQ
H94
K6X
K9.
KB~
M7N
MBDVC
Q9U
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4574f77fc6b37f7388de7e8ff59311f19bb0b5453855c131b0532ab13891c8da3
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 0140-6736
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 08:55:51 EDT 2024
Fri Oct 04 05:02:48 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 26 18:14:53 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 08:51:03 EDT 2024
Fri Feb 23 02:24:40 EST 2024
Thu Aug 18 18:35:12 EDT 2022
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 10032
Language English
License Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c448t-4574f77fc6b37f7388de7e8ff59311f19bb0b5453855c131b0532ab13891c8da3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
PMID 26993881
PQID 1790167387
PQPubID 40246
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1790456351
proquest_journals_1790167387
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_16_00652_8
pubmed_primary_26993881
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_S0140_6736_16_00652_8
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0140673616006528
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-05-14
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-05-14
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-05-14
  day: 14
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle The Lancet (British edition)
PublicationTitleAlternate Lancet
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Elsevier Limited
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
– name: Elsevier Limited
References Birnbaum, Esses, Bijur, Holden, Gallagher (bib36) 2007; 49
Davies, Green, Taylor, Williamson, Mottram, Pirmohamed (bib14) 2009; 4
Tuomilehto, Kokki (bib8) 2002; 46
Safdar, Degutis, Landry, Vedere, Moscovitz, Dapos;Onofrio (bib29) 2006; 48
Kaynar, Koyuncu, Buldu (bib25) 2015; 33
(bib6) 2010
Thomas (bib10) 2013; 2013
Ahmad, Nada, Farid, Haleem, Razack (bib31) 2015; 26
Ay, Sebe, Kozaci (bib26) 2014; 21
Patanwala, Keim, Erstad (bib37) 2010; 44
(bib30) 2002; 325
(bib39) 2007; 9
Cohen, Hafner, Rotenberg, Fadilla, Garty (bib11) 1998; 54
Afshar, Jafari, Marks, Eftekhari, MacNeily (bib4) 2015; 6
Serinken, Eken, Turkcuer, Elicabuk, Uyanik, Schultz (bib19) 2012; 29
Forrest, Camu, Greer (bib12) 2002; 88
Strope, Wolf, Hollenbeck (bib33) 2010; 75
Ducharme (bib35) 2011
Larkin, Peacock, Pearl, Blair, Dapos;Amico (bib27) 1999; 17
Salameh, Hiller, Antopolsky, Ghanem, Abramovitz, Stalnikowics (bib23) 2011; 4
Fisang, Anding, Muller, Latz, Laube (bib3) 2015; 112
Burton, Miner (bib34) 2008
Bektas, Eken, Karadeniz, Goksu, Cubuk, Cete (bib20) 2009; 54
Farsi, Movahedi, Hafezimoghadam, Abbasi, Shahlaee, Rahimi-Movaghar (bib38) 2013; 19
Ghani, Roghmann, Sammon (bib1) 2014; 191
Sakhaee, Maalouf, Sinnott (bib32) 2012; 97
Tveita, Thoner, Klepstad, Dale, Jystad, Borchgrevink (bib7) 2008; 52
Manjiani, Paul, Kunnumpurath, Kaye, Vadivelu (bib15) 2014; 14
Tramer, Williams, Carroll, Wiffen, Moore, McQuay (bib9) 1998; 42
Masoumi, Forouzan, Asgari Darian, Feli, Barzegari, Khavanin (bib17) 2014; 2014
Hjermstad, Fayers, Haugen (bib21) 2011; 41
Masoumi, Forouzan, Asgari Darian, Feli, Barzegari, Khavanin (bib28) 2014; 2014
Pickard, Starr, MacLennan (bib2) 2015
Holdgate, Pollock (bib5) 2005; 2
Labrecque, Dostaler, Rousselle, Nguyen, Poirier (bib16) 1994; 154
Azizkhani, Pourafzali, Baloochestani, Masoumi (bib18) 2013; 18
Grissa, Claessens, Bouida (bib22) 2011; 29
Hindle, Spedding (bib24) 2003; 326
Stein, Ben Dov, Finkel, Mecz, Kitzes, Lurie (bib13) 1996; 14
27477526 - Eur Urol. 2016 Oct;70(4):702
26993882 - Lancet. 2016 May 14;387(10032):1971-2
27598675 - Lancet. 2016 Sep 3;388(10048):961
Pickard (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib2) 2015
Larkin (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib27) 1999; 17
Holdgate (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib5) 2005; 2
Ghani (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib1) 2014; 191
Stein (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib13) 1996; 14
Labrecque (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib16) 1994; 154
Hindle (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib24) 2003; 326
Tuomilehto (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib8) 2002; 46
Sakhaee (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib32) 2012; 97
Serinken (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib19) 2012; 29
Hjermstad (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib21) 2011; 41
(10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib6) 2010
Thomas (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib10) 2013; 2013
Kaynar (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib25) 2015; 33
Salameh (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib23) 2011; 4
Burton (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib34) 2008
Masoumi (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib17) 2014; 2014
Manjiani (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib15) 2014; 14
Masoumi (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib28) 2014; 2014
Ay (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib26) 2014; 21
(10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib30) 2002; 325
Ducharme (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib35) 2011
Azizkhani (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib18) 2013; 18
Afshar (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib4) 2015; 6
Strope (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib33) 2010; 75
Birnbaum (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib36) 2007; 49
Patanwala (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib37) 2010; 44
Fisang (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib3) 2015; 112
(10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib39) 2007; 9
Cohen (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib11) 1998; 54
Davies (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib14) 2009; 4
Bektas (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib20) 2009; 54
Tveita (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib7) 2008; 52
Forrest (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib12) 2002; 88
Ahmad (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib31) 2015; 26
Farsi (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib38) 2013; 19
Safdar (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib29) 2006; 48
Tramer (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib9) 1998; 42
Grissa (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib22) 2011; 29
References_xml – year: 2010
  ident: bib6
  publication-title: Acute Pain Management: Scientific Evidence
– volume: 29
  start-page: 902
  year: 2012
  end-page: 905
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Intravenous paracetamol versus morphine for renal colic in the emergency department: a randomised double-blind controlled trial
  publication-title: Emerg Med J
  contributor:
    fullname: Schultz
– start-page: 49
  year: 2008
  end-page: 53
  ident: bib34
  publication-title: Emergency Sedation and Pain Management
  contributor:
    fullname: Miner
– volume: 326
  start-page: 502
  year: 2003
  ident: bib24
  article-title: Managing acute renal colic. Intramuscular diclofenac should be avoided
  publication-title: BMJ
  contributor:
    fullname: Spedding
– volume: 9
  start-page: 87
  year: 2007
  end-page: 89
  ident: bib39
  article-title: NSAIDS versus opioids for treatment of renal colic
  publication-title: Acute Pain
– volume: 19
  start-page: 398
  year: 2013
  end-page: 404
  ident: bib38
  article-title: Acute pain management with intravenous 0·10 mg/kg vs. 0·15 mg/kg morphine sulfate in limb traumatized patients: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial
  publication-title: Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg
  contributor:
    fullname: Rahimi-Movaghar
– volume: 2013
  start-page: 19
  year: 2013
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Management of pain in the emergency department
  publication-title: ISRN Emerg Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Thomas
– volume: 97
  start-page: 1847
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1860
  ident: bib32
  article-title: Clinical review. Kidney stones 2012: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management
  publication-title: J Clin Endocrinol Metab
  contributor:
    fullname: Sinnott
– volume: 6
  year: 2015
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and non-opioids for acute renal colic
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
  contributor:
    fullname: MacNeily
– volume: 325
  start-page: 1408
  year: 2002
  ident: bib30
  article-title: Intramuscular diclofenac: 25 year worldwide safety perspective is vital to consider
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 54
  start-page: 455
  year: 1998
  end-page: 458
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Comparison of ketorolac and diclofenac in the treatment of renal colic
  publication-title: Eur J Clin Pharmacol
  contributor:
    fullname: Garty
– volume: 88
  start-page: 227
  year: 2002
  end-page: 233
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Ketorolac, diclofenac, and ketoprofen are equally safe for pain relief after major surgery
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  contributor:
    fullname: Greer
– year: 2015
  ident: bib2
  publication-title: Use of drug therapy in the management of symptomatic ureteric stones in hospitalised adults: a multicentre, placebo-controlled, randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis of a calcium channel blocker (nifedipine) and an alpha-blocker (tamsulosin) (the SUSPEND trial)
  contributor:
    fullname: MacLennan
– volume: 14
  start-page: 385
  year: 1996
  end-page: 387
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Single-dose intramuscular ketorolac versus diclofenac for pain management in renal colic
  publication-title: Am J Emerg Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Lurie
– volume: 52
  start-page: 920
  year: 2008
  end-page: 925
  ident: bib7
  article-title: A controlled comparison between single doses of intravenous and intramuscular morphine with respect to analgesic effects and patient safety
  publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
  contributor:
    fullname: Borchgrevink
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1073
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1093
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Studies comparing numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review
  publication-title: J Pain Symptom Manage
  contributor:
    fullname: Haugen
– volume: 29
  start-page: 203
  year: 2011
  end-page: 206
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Paracetamol vs piroxicam to relieve pain in renal colic. Results of a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Am J Emerg Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Bouida
– volume: 112
  start-page: 83
  year: 2015
  end-page: 91
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Urolithiasis—an interdisciplinary diagnostic, therapeutic and secondary preventive challenge
  publication-title: Dtsch Arztebl Int
  contributor:
    fullname: Laube
– volume: 14
  start-page: 208
  year: 2014
  end-page: 215
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Availability and utilization of opioids for pain management: global issues
  publication-title: Ochsner J
  contributor:
    fullname: Vadivelu
– volume: 48
  start-page: 173
  year: 2006
  end-page: 181
  ident: bib29
  article-title: Intravenous morphine plus ketorolac is superior to either drug alone for treatment of acute renal colic
  publication-title: Ann Emerg Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Dapos;Onofrio
– volume: 26
  start-page: 386
  year: 2015
  end-page: 391
  ident: bib31
  article-title: Epidemiology of urolithiasis with emphasis on ultrasound detection: a retrospective analysis of 5371 cases in Saudi Arabia
  publication-title: Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl
  contributor:
    fullname: Razack
– volume: 46
  start-page: 184
  year: 2002
  end-page: 189
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Parenteral ketoprofen for pain management after adenoidectomy: comparison of intravenous and intramuscular routes of administration
  publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
  contributor:
    fullname: Kokki
– volume: 42
  start-page: 71
  year: 1998
  end-page: 79
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Comparing analgesic efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs given by different routes in acute and chronic pain: a qualitative systematic review
  publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
  contributor:
    fullname: McQuay
– volume: 2014
  start-page: 571326
  year: 2014
  ident: bib28
  article-title: Comparison of clinical efficacy of intravenous acetaminophen with intravenous morphine in acute renal colic: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
  publication-title: Emerg Med Int
  contributor:
    fullname: Khavanin
– volume: 33
  start-page: 749
  year: 2015
  end-page: 753
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Comparison of the efficacy of diclofenac, acupuncture, and acetaminophen in the treatment of renal colic
  publication-title: Am J Emerg Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Buldu
– volume: 4
  start-page: e4439
  year: 2009
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Adverse drug reactions in hospital in-patients: a prospective analysis of 3695 patient-episodes
  publication-title: PLoS One
  contributor:
    fullname: Pirmohamed
– volume: 18
  start-page: 772
  year: 2013
  end-page: 776
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Comparing the analgesic effect of intravenous acetaminophen and morphine on patients with renal colic pain referring to the emergency department: A randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: J Res Med Sci
  contributor:
    fullname: Masoumi
– volume: 154
  start-page: 1381
  year: 1994
  end-page: 1387
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of acute renal colic. A meta-analysis
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Poirier
– volume: 54
  start-page: 568
  year: 2009
  end-page: 574
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Intravenous paracetamol or morphine for the treatment of renal colic: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial
  publication-title: Ann Emerg Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Cete
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1800
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1809
  ident: bib37
  article-title: Intravenous opioids for severe acute pain in the emergency department
  publication-title: Ann Pharmacother
  contributor:
    fullname: Erstad
– volume: 2
  year: 2005
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) versus opioids for acute renal colic
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
  contributor:
    fullname: Pollock
– volume: 2014
  start-page: 571326
  year: 2014
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Comparison of clinical efficacy of intravenous acetaminophen with intravenous morphine in acute renal colic: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
  publication-title: Emerg Med Int
  contributor:
    fullname: Khavanin
– volume: 4
  start-page: 9
  year: 2011
  end-page: 13
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Diclofenac versus tramadol in the treatment of renal colic: a prospective, randomized trial
  publication-title: Open Emerg Med J
  contributor:
    fullname: Stalnikowics
– volume: 49
  start-page: 445
  year: 2007
  end-page: 453
  ident: bib36
  article-title: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of two intravenous morphine dosages (0.10 mg/kg and 0.15 mg/kg) in emergency department patients with moderate to severe acute pain
  publication-title: Ann Emerg Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Gallagher
– volume: 191
  start-page: 90
  year: 2014
  end-page: 96
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Emergency department visits in the United States for upper urinary tract stones: trends in hospitalization and charges
  publication-title: J Urol
  contributor:
    fullname: Sammon
– volume: 17
  start-page: 6
  year: 1999
  end-page: 10
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Efficacy of ketorolac tromethamine versus meperidine in the ED treatment of acute renal colic
  publication-title: Am J Emerg Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Dapos;Amico
– volume: 75
  start-page: 543
  year: 2010
  end-page: 546
  ident: bib33
  article-title: Changes in gender distribution of urinary stone disease
  publication-title: Urology
  contributor:
    fullname: Hollenbeck
– year: 2011
  ident: bib35
  article-title: Acute pain management in adults
  publication-title: Tintinalli's emergency medicine: a comprehensive study guide
  contributor:
    fullname: Ducharme
– volume: 21
  start-page: 296
  year: 2014
  end-page: 303
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of dexketoprofen trometamol and meperidine HCl in the relief of renal colic
  publication-title: Am J Ther
  contributor:
    fullname: Kozaci
– volume: 48
  start-page: 173
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib29
  article-title: Intravenous morphine plus ketorolac is superior to either drug alone for treatment of acute renal colic
  publication-title: Ann Emerg Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.013
  contributor:
    fullname: Safdar
– volume: 29
  start-page: 203
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib22
  article-title: Paracetamol vs piroxicam to relieve pain in renal colic. Results of a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Am J Emerg Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.09.019
  contributor:
    fullname: Grissa
– volume: 2014
  start-page: 571326
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib28
  article-title: Comparison of clinical efficacy of intravenous acetaminophen with intravenous morphine in acute renal colic: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
  publication-title: Emerg Med Int
  doi: 10.1155/2014/571326
  contributor:
    fullname: Masoumi
– volume: 154
  start-page: 1381
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib16
  article-title: Efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of acute renal colic. A meta-analysis
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
  doi: 10.1001/archinte.1994.00420120113012
  contributor:
    fullname: Labrecque
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1073
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib21
  article-title: Studies comparing numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review
  publication-title: J Pain Symptom Manage
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016
  contributor:
    fullname: Hjermstad
– volume: 2014
  start-page: 571326
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib17
  article-title: Comparison of clinical efficacy of intravenous acetaminophen with intravenous morphine in acute renal colic: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
  publication-title: Emerg Med Int
  doi: 10.1155/2014/571326
  contributor:
    fullname: Masoumi
– year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib35
  article-title: Acute pain management in adults
  contributor:
    fullname: Ducharme
– volume: 9
  start-page: 87
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib39
  article-title: NSAIDS versus opioids for treatment of renal colic
  publication-title: Acute Pain
  doi: 10.1016/j.acpain.2006.11.004
– volume: 75
  start-page: 543
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib33
  article-title: Changes in gender distribution of urinary stone disease
  publication-title: Urology
  doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.007
  contributor:
    fullname: Strope
– volume: 4
  start-page: e4439
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib14
  article-title: Adverse drug reactions in hospital in-patients: a prospective analysis of 3695 patient-episodes
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004439
  contributor:
    fullname: Davies
– volume: 325
  start-page: 1408
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib30
  article-title: Intramuscular diclofenac: 25 year worldwide safety perspective is vital to consider
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 42
  start-page: 71
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib9
  article-title: Comparing analgesic efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs given by different routes in acute and chronic pain: a qualitative systematic review
  publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
  doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05083.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Tramer
– volume: 54
  start-page: 455
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib11
  article-title: Comparison of ketorolac and diclofenac in the treatment of renal colic
  publication-title: Eur J Clin Pharmacol
  doi: 10.1007/s002280050492
  contributor:
    fullname: Cohen
– volume: 19
  start-page: 398
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib38
  article-title: Acute pain management with intravenous 0·10 mg/kg vs. 0·15 mg/kg morphine sulfate in limb traumatized patients: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial
  publication-title: Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg
  doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2013.86383
  contributor:
    fullname: Farsi
– volume: 46
  start-page: 184
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib8
  article-title: Parenteral ketoprofen for pain management after adenoidectomy: comparison of intravenous and intramuscular routes of administration
  publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
  doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460211.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Tuomilehto
– volume: 4
  start-page: 9
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib23
  article-title: Diclofenac versus tramadol in the treatment of renal colic: a prospective, randomized trial
  publication-title: Open Emerg Med J
  doi: 10.2174/1876542401104010009
  contributor:
    fullname: Salameh
– volume: 88
  start-page: 227
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib12
  article-title: Ketorolac, diclofenac, and ketoprofen are equally safe for pain relief after major surgery
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1093/bja/88.2.227
  contributor:
    fullname: Forrest
– volume: 18
  start-page: 772
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib18
  article-title: Comparing the analgesic effect of intravenous acetaminophen and morphine on patients with renal colic pain referring to the emergency department: A randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: J Res Med Sci
  contributor:
    fullname: Azizkhani
– volume: 17
  start-page: 6
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib27
  article-title: Efficacy of ketorolac tromethamine versus meperidine in the ED treatment of acute renal colic
  publication-title: Am J Emerg Med
  doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(99)90003-7
  contributor:
    fullname: Larkin
– volume: 6
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib4
  article-title: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and non-opioids for acute renal colic
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
  doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006027.pub2
  contributor:
    fullname: Afshar
– volume: 21
  start-page: 296
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib26
  article-title: Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of dexketoprofen trometamol and meperidine HCl in the relief of renal colic
  publication-title: Am J Ther
  doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e318274db78
  contributor:
    fullname: Ay
– volume: 26
  start-page: 386
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib31
  article-title: Epidemiology of urolithiasis with emphasis on ultrasound detection: a retrospective analysis of 5371 cases in Saudi Arabia
  publication-title: Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl
  doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.152557
  contributor:
    fullname: Ahmad
– year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib2
  contributor:
    fullname: Pickard
– volume: 2
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib5
  article-title: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) versus opioids for acute renal colic
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
  contributor:
    fullname: Holdgate
– volume: 112
  start-page: 83
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib3
  article-title: Urolithiasis—an interdisciplinary diagnostic, therapeutic and secondary preventive challenge
  publication-title: Dtsch Arztebl Int
  contributor:
    fullname: Fisang
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1800
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib37
  article-title: Intravenous opioids for severe acute pain in the emergency department
  publication-title: Ann Pharmacother
  doi: 10.1345/aph.1P438
  contributor:
    fullname: Patanwala
– volume: 326
  start-page: 502
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib24
  article-title: Managing acute renal colic. Intramuscular diclofenac should be avoided
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7387.502
  contributor:
    fullname: Hindle
– volume: 33
  start-page: 749
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib25
  article-title: Comparison of the efficacy of diclofenac, acupuncture, and acetaminophen in the treatment of renal colic
  publication-title: Am J Emerg Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.02.033
  contributor:
    fullname: Kaynar
– volume: 52
  start-page: 920
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib7
  article-title: A controlled comparison between single doses of intravenous and intramuscular morphine with respect to analgesic effects and patient safety
  publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
  doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01608.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Tveita
– volume: 14
  start-page: 385
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib13
  article-title: Single-dose intramuscular ketorolac versus diclofenac for pain management in renal colic
  publication-title: Am J Emerg Med
  doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90055-8
  contributor:
    fullname: Stein
– volume: 14
  start-page: 208
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib15
  article-title: Availability and utilization of opioids for pain management: global issues
  publication-title: Ochsner J
  contributor:
    fullname: Manjiani
– year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib6
– volume: 29
  start-page: 902
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib19
  article-title: Intravenous paracetamol versus morphine for renal colic in the emergency department: a randomised double-blind controlled trial
  publication-title: Emerg Med J
  doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200165
  contributor:
    fullname: Serinken
– start-page: 49
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib34
  contributor:
    fullname: Burton
– volume: 191
  start-page: 90
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib1
  article-title: Emergency department visits in the United States for upper urinary tract stones: trends in hospitalization and charges
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.098
  contributor:
    fullname: Ghani
– volume: 2013
  start-page: 19
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib10
  article-title: Management of pain in the emergency department
  publication-title: ISRN Emerg Med
  doi: 10.1155/2013/583132
  contributor:
    fullname: Thomas
– volume: 54
  start-page: 568
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib20
  article-title: Intravenous paracetamol or morphine for the treatment of renal colic: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial
  publication-title: Ann Emerg Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.06.501
  contributor:
    fullname: Bektas
– volume: 49
  start-page: 445
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib36
  article-title: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of two intravenous morphine dosages (0.10 mg/kg and 0.15 mg/kg) in emergency department patients with moderate to severe acute pain
  publication-title: Ann Emerg Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.030
  contributor:
    fullname: Birnbaum
– volume: 97
  start-page: 1847
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8_bib32
  article-title: Clinical review. Kidney stones 2012: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management
  publication-title: J Clin Endocrinol Metab
  doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-3492
  contributor:
    fullname: Sakhaee
SSID ssj0004605
Score 2.5544248
Snippet Summary Background The excruciating pain of patients with renal colic on presentation to the emergency department requires effective analgesia to be...
The excruciating pain of patients with renal colic on presentation to the emergency department requires effective analgesia to be administered in the shortest...
BACKGROUNDThe excruciating pain of patients with renal colic on presentation to the emergency department requires effective analgesia to be administered in the...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 1999
SubjectTerms Acetaminophen - administration & dosage
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Analgesia - methods
Analgesia - standards
Analgesics
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration & dosage
Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
Anti-inflammatory agents
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration & dosage
Clinical trials
Delivery of Health Care - standards
Diclofenac - administration & dosage
Double-Blind Method
Emergency medical care
Emergency medical services
Emergency Service, Hospital - standards
Female
Humans
Injections, Intramuscular
Injections, Intravenous
Internal Medicine
Kidneys
Male
Medical research
Middle Aged
Morphine - administration & dosage
Narcotics
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Pain
Pain management
Patients
Qatar
Renal Colic - drug therapy
Side effects
Tertiary Care Centers
Time-to-Treatment
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Title Delivering safe and effective analgesia for management of renal colic in the emergency department: a double-blind, multigroup, randomised controlled trial
URI https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0140673616006528
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26993881
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1790167387/abstract/
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1790456351
Volume 387
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1La9wwEBZpAqWX0nc3L1TooYWou7JkS-4ltGnCUkgobQN7M3pCYGun690_k1-bGfmRS9JejC17ZCyNZz5b38wQ8j6A5gqlS-Zt5hgGPzKTzSITEZOrgb-SAuOdzy-K-aX8vsgXW2Q-xMIgrXKwiclQ-8bhP_IpZpLiWKJSTY3FvwBuPT2-_suwfhSus_bFNB6RHZ4BrADNVgt1X4RkIrvfxfJMf42NH3jxEV0ymIiHvNRDKDR5o7Nn5GkPI-mXbt6fk61QvyCPz_uF8pfk5ltYIuMCHBNtTQzU1J523A1ohiMs79FeGQqYlf4ZKTC0iXQVsGeH-YLpVU0BINIwxGhSD95rlYjpn6mhvtnYZWAWoKo_oombmKJEjih4QN-ACgVPezL8EnZTiZBX5PLs9PfJnPVlGJiDb7c1k7mSUanoCitUhBnQPqigY8xLwXnkpbUzC0BM6Dx3XHCLxSaMTSugTnsjXpPtuqnDW0KDKI3TDlADZkaT3DiZc2OkziUvwVJMyKdh2KvrLttGdQ8NjSMVD-ap0hOihsmphlBSMH6h7d_EtuJVm1WzThqFeZFEQVKPkj3Y6EBEBb7kfzfdH9SgurvPqJ8T8m48DQONCzCmDs2muwYAq8j5hLzp1Gd8zKwApKg13_1353vkCUC2AvkLXO6T7fVqEw4AFq3tYdJ42OoTfkh2vp5e_Ph5CymvCYs
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,12083,12250,21416,27957,27958,31754,31755,33301,33302,33779,33780,43345,43614,43840,74102,74371,74659
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Nb9QwELWgSMAF8c1CC0biAFJN12sncXqpqkK1QLcXWqk3y59SpSUpm90_w69lxnHSSwu3bHYn1tqTeS_xmxlCPgTwXFGpmnk7cwyTH5mZTSMTEYurAV5JgfnOi9Nyfi6_XxQX-YVbl2WVQ0xMgdq3Dt-R72ElKY4tKquDq98Mu0bh7mpuoXGX3JMCgAYzxY_4TXmRSeJ-ncGz93M8-ZGXnxCIITDchk23cc-EQcePyaNMHulhv9pPyJ3QPCX3F3l7_Bn58yUsUWcBcEQ7EwM1jae9YgNOwyds6tFdGgpMlf4ahS-0jXQV8MoOqwTTy4YCLaRhyMykHjBrleTo-9RQ327sMjALBNXv0qRITLkhuxRwz7fgOMHTLIFfwmFqDPKcnB9_PTuas9x8gTl4YlszWVQyVlV0pRVVhHlXPlRBxVjUgvPIa2unFuiXUEXhuOAWW0wYm_Y9nfJGvCBbTduEV4QGURunHHAFrIcmuXGy4MZIVUheQ3yYkM_DtOurvsaGvkF8xlGAB-uk1YRUw-LoIYEUQl7o8v3Xaa67mZ721mjMy2QKlmq0zBSjpw4aEOR_g24PbqCvxxm9ckLej1_DROO2i2lCu-l_AzRVFHxCXvbuM_7NWQn8UCn--t8Xf0cezM8WJ_rk2-mPN-QhkLYSFQxcbpOt9WoTdoAYre3b5P1_ASNxBiI
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9QwELagSBUXVJ5dWsBIHEBq2PXaiR0uCFFW5dEKCSrtzfJTqrQkZbP7Z_i1zDhOemnhltckSjyZ70v8zQwhrwJ4LpeqLryduwKTHwszn8WCRyyuBnglOOY7n55VJ-fiy7JcZv1Tl2WVQ0xMgdq3Dv-RT7GSFMMWlXIasyzi-_Hi_eXvAjtI4Uxrbqdxm9wBlJxhNwO5lNflSCa5-1U2z_THuPE1q94gKEOQuAmnbuKhCY8We-ReJpL0Qz_y98mt0Dwgu6d5qvwh-XMcVqi5AGiinYmBmsbTXr0Bm2ENG3x0F4YCa6W_RhEMbSNdBzyzw4rB9KKhQBFpGLI0qQf8Widp-jtqqG-3dhUKC2TVH9GkTkx5IkcUMNC34ETB0yyHX8FiahLyiJwvPv38eFLkRgyFg6-3TSFKKaKU0VWWywhjoHyQQcVY1pyxyGprZxaoGFdl6RhnFttNGJvmQJ3yhj8mO03bhH1CA6-NUw54A9ZGE8w4UTJjhCoFqyFWTMjb4bHry77ehr5GiMZQjAfjpNWEyGFw9JBMCuEvdPld7DTT3VzPems0ZlUyBUs1Wma60dMIDWjyv4seDm6gr64zeuiEvBx3w4PGKRjThHbbHwOUlZdsQp707jPe5rwCrqgUe_rvk78gu-D4-tvns68H5C7wtwrFDEwckp3NehueAUfa2OfJ-f8C6u4Kgw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Delivering+safe+and+effective+analgesia+for+management+of+renal+colic+in+the+emergency+department%3A+a+double-blind%2C+multigroup%2C+randomised+controlled+trial&rft.jtitle=The+Lancet+%28British+edition%29&rft.au=Pathan%2C+Sameer+A&rft.au=Mitra%2C+Biswadev&rft.au=Straney%2C+Lahn+D&rft.au=Afzal%2C+Muhammad+Shuaib&rft.date=2016-05-14&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.volume=387&rft.issue=10032&rft.spage=1999&rft.epage=2007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2816%2900652-8&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_S0140_6736_16_00652_8
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0140-6736&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0140-6736&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0140-6736&client=summon