Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis and Clinical Trial Simulation to Inform Dose Titration Decisions

Optimal dose selection in clinical trials is problematic when efficacious and toxic concentrations are close. A novel quantitative approach follows for optimizing dose titration in clinical trials. A system of pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and toxicity was simulated for scenario...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCPT: pharmacometrics and systems pharmacology Vol. 7; no. 11; pp. 771 - 779
Main Authors Clements, John David, Perez Ruixo, Juan Jose, Gibbs, John P., Doshi, Sameer, Perez Ruixo, Carlos, Melhem, Murad
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.11.2018
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2163-8306
2163-8306
DOI10.1002/psp4.12354

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Optimal dose selection in clinical trials is problematic when efficacious and toxic concentrations are close. A novel quantitative approach follows for optimizing dose titration in clinical trials. A system of pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and toxicity was simulated for scenarios characterized by varying degrees of different types of variability. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and clinical trial simulation (CTS) were used to optimize drug titration by maximizing efficacy/safety. The scenarios included were a low‐variability base scenario, and high residual (20%), interoccasion (20%), interindividual (40%), and residual plus interindividual variability scenarios, and finally a shallow toxicity slope scenario. The percentage of subjects having toxicity was reduced by 87.4% to 93.5%, and those having efficacy was increased by 52.7% to 243%. Interindividual PK variability may have less impact on optimal cutoff values than other sources of variability. ROC/CTS methods for optimizing dose titration offer an individualized approach that leverages exposure‐response relationships.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2163-8306
2163-8306
DOI:10.1002/psp4.12354