Good News about Bad News: Gamified Inoculation Boosts Confidence and Cognitive Immunity Against Fake News

Recent research has explored the possibility of building attitudinal resistance against online misinformation through psychological inoculation. The inoculation metaphor relies on a medical analogy: by pre-emptively exposing people to weakened doses of misinformation cognitive immunity can be confer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cognition Vol. 3; no. 1; p. 2
Main Authors Basol, Melisa, Roozenbeek, Jon, Van der Linden, Sander
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Ubiquity Press 10.01.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Recent research has explored the possibility of building attitudinal resistance against online misinformation through psychological inoculation. The inoculation metaphor relies on a medical analogy: by pre-emptively exposing people to weakened doses of misinformation cognitive immunity can be conferred. A recent example is the game, an online fake news game in which players learn about six common misinformation techniques. We present a replication and extension into the effectiveness of as an anti-misinformation intervention. We address three shortcomings identified in the original study: the lack of a control group, the relatively low number of test items, and the absence of attitudinal certainty measurements. Using a 2 (treatment vs. control) × 2 (pre vs. post) mixed design (N = 196) we measure participants' ability to spot misinformation techniques in 18 fake headlines before and after playing . We find that playing significantly improves people's ability to spot misinformation techniques compared to a gamified control group, and crucially, also increases people's level of confidence in their own judgments. Importantly, this confidence boost only occurred for those who updated their reliability assessments in the correct direction. This study offers further evidence for the effectiveness of psychological inoculation against not only specific instances of fake news, but the very strategies used in its production. Implications are discussed for inoculation theory and cognitive science research on fake news.
AbstractList Recent research has explored the possibility of building attitudinal resistance against online misinformation through psychological inoculation. The inoculation metaphor relies on a medical analogy: by pre-emptively exposing people to weakened doses of misinformation cognitive immunity can be conferred. A recent example is the game, an online fake news game in which players learn about six common misinformation techniques. We present a replication and extension into the effectiveness of as an anti-misinformation intervention. We address three shortcomings identified in the original study: the lack of a control group, the relatively low number of test items, and the absence of attitudinal certainty measurements. Using a 2 (treatment vs. control) × 2 (pre vs. post) mixed design (N = 196) we measure participants' ability to spot misinformation techniques in 18 fake headlines before and after playing . We find that playing significantly improves people's ability to spot misinformation techniques compared to a gamified control group, and crucially, also increases people's level of confidence in their own judgments. Importantly, this confidence boost only occurred for those who updated their reliability assessments in the correct direction. This study offers further evidence for the effectiveness of psychological inoculation against not only specific instances of fake news, but the very strategies used in its production. Implications are discussed for inoculation theory and cognitive science research on fake news.
Recent research has explored the possibility of building attitudinal resistance against online misinformation through psychological inoculation. The inoculation metaphor relies on a medical analogy: by pre-emptively exposing people to weakened doses of misinformation cognitive immunity can be conferred. A recent example is the Bad News game, an online fake news game in which players learn about six common misinformation techniques. We present a replication and extension into the effectiveness of Bad News as an anti-misinformation intervention. We address three shortcomings identified in the original study: the lack of a control group, the relatively low number of test items, and the absence of attitudinal certainty measurements. Using a 2 (treatment vs. control) × 2 (pre vs. post) mixed design (N = 196) we measure participants' ability to spot misinformation techniques in 18 fake headlines before and after playing Bad News. We find that playing Bad News significantly improves people's ability to spot misinformation techniques compared to a gamified control group, and crucially, also increases people's level of confidence in their own judgments. Importantly, this confidence boost only occurred for those who updated their reliability assessments in the correct direction. This study offers further evidence for the effectiveness of psychological inoculation against not only specific instances of fake news, but the very strategies used in its production. Implications are discussed for inoculation theory and cognitive science research on fake news.Recent research has explored the possibility of building attitudinal resistance against online misinformation through psychological inoculation. The inoculation metaphor relies on a medical analogy: by pre-emptively exposing people to weakened doses of misinformation cognitive immunity can be conferred. A recent example is the Bad News game, an online fake news game in which players learn about six common misinformation techniques. We present a replication and extension into the effectiveness of Bad News as an anti-misinformation intervention. We address three shortcomings identified in the original study: the lack of a control group, the relatively low number of test items, and the absence of attitudinal certainty measurements. Using a 2 (treatment vs. control) × 2 (pre vs. post) mixed design (N = 196) we measure participants' ability to spot misinformation techniques in 18 fake headlines before and after playing Bad News. We find that playing Bad News significantly improves people's ability to spot misinformation techniques compared to a gamified control group, and crucially, also increases people's level of confidence in their own judgments. Importantly, this confidence boost only occurred for those who updated their reliability assessments in the correct direction. This study offers further evidence for the effectiveness of psychological inoculation against not only specific instances of fake news, but the very strategies used in its production. Implications are discussed for inoculation theory and cognitive science research on fake news.
Recent research has explored the possibility of building attitudinal resistance against online misinformation through psychological inoculation. The inoculation metaphor relies on a medical analogy: by pre-emptively exposing people to weakened doses of misinformation cognitive immunity can be conferred. A recent example is the Bad News game, an online fake news game in which players learn about six common misinformation techniques. We present a replication and extension into the effectiveness of Bad News as an anti-misinformation intervention. We address three shortcomings identified in the original study: the lack of a control group, the relatively low number of test items, and the absence of attitudinal certainty measurements. Using a 2 (treatment vs. control) × 2 (pre vs. post) mixed design (N = 196) we measure participants’ ability to spot misinformation techniques in 18 fake headlines before and after playing Bad News . We find that playing Bad News significantly improves people’s ability to spot misinformation techniques compared to a gamified control group, and crucially, also increases people’s level of confidence in their own judgments. Importantly, this confidence boost only occurred for those who updated their reliability assessments in the correct direction. This study offers further evidence for the effectiveness of psychological inoculation against not only specific instances of fake news, but the very strategies used in its production. Implications are discussed for inoculation theory and cognitive science research on fake news.
Recent research has explored the possibility of building attitudinal resistance against online misinformation through psychological inoculation. The inoculation metaphor relies on a medical analogy: by pre-emptively exposing people to weakened doses of misinformation cognitive immunity can be conferred. A recent example is the 'Bad News' game, an online fake news game in which players learn about six common misinformation techniques. We present a replication and extension into the effectiveness of 'Bad News' as an anti-misinformation intervention. We address three shortcomings identified in the original study: the lack of a control group, the relatively low number of test items, and the absence of attitudinal certainty measurements. Using a 2 (treatment vs. control) × 2 (pre vs. post) mixed design (N = 196) we measure participants’ ability to spot misinformation techniques in 18 fake headlines before and after playing 'Bad News'. We find that playing 'Bad News' significantly improves people’s ability to spot misinformation techniques compared to a gamified control group, and crucially, also increases people’s level of confidence in their own judgments. Importantly, this confidence boost only occurred for those who updated their reliability assessments in the correct direction. This study offers further evidence for the effectiveness of psychological inoculation against not only specific instances of fake news, but the very strategies used in its production. Implications are discussed for inoculation theory and cognitive science research on fake news.
Author Basol, Melisa
Van der Linden, Sander
Roozenbeek, Jon
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Melisa
  surname: Basol
  fullname: Basol, Melisa
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jon
  surname: Roozenbeek
  fullname: Roozenbeek, Jon
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Sander
  surname: Van der Linden
  fullname: Van der Linden, Sander
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31934684$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpdkk1vEzEQhi1UREtafgLyCXEgxV_r2ByQ2oiGSBVcytma9c4Gh127rHdb9d_XJC1qe5qvV88rzcxbchBTRELecXZaSak-b5M_tfwVORIVV3NlBDt4kh-Sk5y3jDHBK8G0fEMOJbdSaaOOSFil1NAfeJsp1Gka6Tnsyy90BX1oAzZ0HZOfOhhDivQ8pTxmukyxDQ1GjxRiU8pNDGO4Qbru-6mkd_RsAyHmkV7AH9wBj8nrFrqMJw9xRn5dfLtafp9f_lytl2eXc6-U4XPgnks0NWtrbWoEYwUoyczCLqzildI1ADZlyIDXTAstLJeMeTANwkK0ckbWe26TYOuuh9DDcOcSBLdrpGHjYBiD79Ax22jD0XPFlWqlsVzUHiqmKwRrpC6sr3vW9VT32HiM4wDdM-jzSQy_3SbdOG0rYbQpgI8PgCH9nTCPrg_ZY9dBxDRlJ6Q0rDKqskX6_qnXf5PHWxXBp73ADynnAVvnw7i7SrEOnePM_fsGV77BlZ3MyIcX8kfiC-E975mzoA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1145_3677092
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41562_024_01992_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2020_104545
crossref_primary_10_15252_embr_202052282
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18084090
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4046264
crossref_primary_10_1177_00936502241288103
crossref_primary_10_3389_fcomm_2024_1345973
crossref_primary_10_1177_01634437241265045
crossref_primary_10_3390_su15086681
crossref_primary_10_1002_asi_24954
crossref_primary_10_3390_vaccines11121848
crossref_primary_10_1177_09636625211024550
crossref_primary_10_1080_09515089_2022_2130746
crossref_primary_10_1177_1368430220965709
crossref_primary_10_3390_bs11120175
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_39807_x
crossref_primary_10_1093_pnasnexus_pgad094
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41591_022_01728_z
crossref_primary_10_1080_10810730_2024_2339238
crossref_primary_10_1109_TCSS_2022_3171391
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13164_024_00741_0
crossref_primary_10_2478_nispa_2023_0005
crossref_primary_10_1002_acp_4025
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0283238
crossref_primary_10_1038_d41586_022_03354_8
crossref_primary_10_1145_3677113
crossref_primary_10_37016_mr_2020_47
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2022_107643
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_30867_7
crossref_primary_10_1177_10776990211035395
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41562_020_0884_z
crossref_primary_10_1080_08934215_2025_2465306
crossref_primary_10_2196_40753
crossref_primary_10_30935_cedtech_14335
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2024_108338
crossref_primary_10_1007_s42001_024_00351_x
crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2314143120
crossref_primary_10_1080_10494820_2023_2299999
crossref_primary_10_1111_risa_13615
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_61232_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_bjdp_12456
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_34402_6
crossref_primary_10_1177_1368430220987596
crossref_primary_10_1177_14614448211019198
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2024_1430953
crossref_primary_10_3390_vaccines11020321
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41591_022_01713_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvp_2020_101455
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_copsyc_2023_101735
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_71599_6
crossref_primary_10_1177_17470218211048986
crossref_primary_10_30658_hmc_3_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s42001_021_00118_8
crossref_primary_10_2196_49255
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1930297500003570
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10462_024_10778_3
crossref_primary_10_1177_0013164420940378
crossref_primary_10_1556_112_2022_00086
crossref_primary_10_3390_encyclopedia1040091
crossref_primary_10_1080_13669877_2023_2249909
crossref_primary_10_1215_03616878_10910233
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tsc_2021_100915
crossref_primary_10_3389_fcomm_2022_824682
crossref_primary_10_36850_e12
crossref_primary_10_7326_M20_6206
crossref_primary_10_1093_tbm_ibab029
crossref_primary_10_1080_21645515_2022_2087411
crossref_primary_10_1111_pops_13057
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_paid_2021_111269
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_024_05668_4
crossref_primary_10_1080_08923647_2023_2231814
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2022_107587
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2024_105210
crossref_primary_10_3390_socsci12090470
crossref_primary_10_19132_1808_5245_29_124379
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_931865
crossref_primary_10_1080_21645515_2024_2407204
crossref_primary_10_1080_15391523_2024_2338451
crossref_primary_10_1111_acps_13290
crossref_primary_10_1080_0163853X_2022_2085477
crossref_primary_10_1017_SJP_2021_23
crossref_primary_10_1089_cyber_2023_0324
crossref_primary_10_1515_opis_2022_0132
crossref_primary_10_1111_asap_12410
crossref_primary_10_1093_joc_jqae032
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jesp_2024_104632
crossref_primary_10_1080_10463283_2021_1876983
crossref_primary_10_21240_mpaed_51_2023_01_12_X
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10900_022_01100_9
crossref_primary_10_34135_mlar_23_01_04
crossref_primary_10_1177_1529100620946707
crossref_primary_10_1177_20539517211013868
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20020980
crossref_primary_10_1080_25741136_2022_2086960
crossref_primary_10_1177_00027162221087936
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2020_566790
crossref_primary_10_1002_acp_4187
crossref_primary_10_37016_mr_2020_020
crossref_primary_10_37016_mr_2020_141
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0280295
crossref_primary_10_1002_acp_4184
crossref_primary_10_12677_AAM_2022_118613
crossref_primary_10_3389_fcomm_2022_993510
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0283951
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4648332
crossref_primary_10_37016__mr_2020_008
crossref_primary_10_1145_3449080
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41562_020_0889_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2022_103687
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jarmac_2020_12_005
crossref_primary_10_1080_15228959_2023_2252322
crossref_primary_10_1515_libri_2023_0043
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2023_104832
crossref_primary_10_1145_3579520
crossref_primary_10_1177_01461672211054947
crossref_primary_10_37016_mr_2020_033
crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2013249117
crossref_primary_10_1177_20563051241279253
crossref_primary_10_1007_s41060_021_00307_8
crossref_primary_10_37016_mr_2020_152
crossref_primary_10_1111_pops_12797
crossref_primary_10_37016_mr_2020_158
crossref_primary_10_1038_s44271_023_00052_7
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0140525X22002023
crossref_primary_10_1027_1864_1105_a000407
crossref_primary_10_1177_08901171211070958
crossref_primary_10_1108_TG_09_2023_0135
crossref_primary_10_3389_fcomm_2023_1106165
crossref_primary_10_1002_hec_4760
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2023_103930
crossref_primary_10_1080_17512786_2021_1991439
crossref_primary_10_1177_08901171211070957
crossref_primary_10_1145_3555589
crossref_primary_10_52586_4931
crossref_primary_10_1080_01463373_2024_2368124
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41562_024_01881_0
crossref_primary_10_1177_10755470211048480
crossref_primary_10_36850_r5
crossref_primary_10_5209_esmp_88599
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jemep_2022_100812
crossref_primary_10_1111_pops_12681
crossref_primary_10_1080_21670811_2022_2081863
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acalib_2022_102540
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10758_024_09749_y
crossref_primary_10_1080_10691316_2023_2292986
crossref_primary_10_1177_00207640231178484
crossref_primary_10_1002_widm_70001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2024_105136
crossref_primary_10_1177_09610006231208027
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_024_51740_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_spc3_12602
crossref_primary_10_1177_0095327X231163265
crossref_primary_10_1027_1016_9040_a000492
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2021_106796
crossref_primary_10_1111_jasp_13049
crossref_primary_10_1177_1529100620972100
crossref_primary_10_1027_1016_9040_a000493
Cites_doi 10.1177/1529100612451018
10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00611.x
10.1126/science.aar4533
10.1126/science.aao2998
10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_11
10.1080/03637751003758193
10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
10.1080/23808985.2005.11679045
10.1080/03637750500322578
10.1038/540525a
10.1037/h0048344
10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00303.x
10.1177/2515245919847202
10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
10.1177/0956797617714579
10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60052-0
10.1080/03637751.2018.1467564
10.1080/15534510.2018.1471415
10.1037/xge0000465
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s).
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s) 2020
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s).
– notice: Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s) 2020
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.5334/joc.91
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Psychology
EISSN 2514-4820
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_09d681ec14144f38912bca5065ea9836
PMC6952868
31934684
10_5334_joc_91
Genre News
GroupedDBID .0O
AAFWJ
AAPRH
AAYXX
ACCQO
ADBBV
AFPKN
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BCNDV
CITATION
GROUPED_DOAJ
H13
HYE
IAO
IER
IHR
ISR
ITC
M~E
OK1
PGMZT
RPM
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4481-a1c13e8b0fb68bea892a4308797941546baaedfb60a1b0626291300ca8dea72f3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 2514-4820
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:29:36 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:28:44 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 15:49:38 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 23:00:23 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:36:39 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:00:25 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Decision making: Reasoning
Judgment
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s).
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4481-a1c13e8b0fb68bea892a4308797941546baaedfb60a1b0626291300ca8dea72f3
Notes content type line 23
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/09d681ec14144f38912bca5065ea9836
PMID 31934684
PQID 2338058459
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_09d681ec14144f38912bca5065ea9836
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6952868
proquest_miscellaneous_2338058459
pubmed_primary_31934684
crossref_citationtrail_10_5334_joc_91
crossref_primary_10_5334_joc_91
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20200110
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-01-10
PublicationDate_xml – month: 1
  year: 2020
  text: 20200110
  day: 10
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Journal of cognition
PublicationTitleAlternate J Cogn
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Ubiquity Press
Publisher_xml – name: Ubiquity Press
References (key20200110024712_B1) 2019; 6
(key20200110024712_B6) 2019
(key20200110024712_B17) 2019
key20200110024712_B9
(key20200110024712_B11) 2016; 540
(key20200110024712_B23) 2018; 22
(key20200110024712_B29) 2018; 85
(key20200110024712_B25) 2019
(key20200110024712_B3) 2018; 13
(key20200110024712_B18) 2017; 70
(key20200110024712_B16) 1961; 63
(key20200110024712_B28) 2017; 358
(key20200110024712_B7) 2005; 29
(key20200110024712_B20) 2019; 188
(key20200110024712_B4) 2017; 28
(key20200110024712_B19) 2018; 147
(key20200110024712_B24) 2019; 5
(key20200110024712_B30) 2007; 33
(key20200110024712_B14) 2012; 13
(key20200110024712_B12) 2018; 359
(key20200110024712_B8) 2017; 12
(key20200110024712_B26) 2004; 14
(key20200110024712_B22) 1978; 4
(key20200110024712_B5) 2013
(key20200110024712_B2) 2010; 77
(key20200110024712_B10) 2019; 2
(key20200110024712_B13) 2017; 6
(key20200110024712_B21) 2005; 72
(key20200110024712_B15) 1964; 1
(key20200110024712_B27) 2017; 1
References_xml – volume: 13
  start-page: 106
  issue: 3
  year: 2012
  ident: key20200110024712_B14
  article-title: Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing
  publication-title: Psychological Science in the Public Interest
  doi: 10.1177/1529100612451018
– year: 2019
  ident: key20200110024712_B25
  article-title: Effective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions
  publication-title: Nature Human Behaviour
– volume: 1
  issue: 2
  year: 2017
  ident: key20200110024712_B27
  article-title: Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change
  publication-title: Global Challenges
– volume: 4
  start-page: 217
  issue: 3
  year: 1978
  ident: key20200110024712_B22
  article-title: The effects of initial belief level on inoculation theory and its proposed mechanisms
  publication-title: Human Communication Research
  doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00611.x
– volume: 358
  start-page: 1141
  issue: 6367
  year: 2017
  ident: key20200110024712_B28
  article-title: Inoculating against misinformation
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.aar4533
– volume: 6
  start-page: 30
  year: 2019
  ident: key20200110024712_B1
  article-title: On WhatsApp, Rumours, and Lynchings
  publication-title: Economic & Political Review Weekly
– year: 2019
  ident: key20200110024712_B6
  article-title: Prophylactic versus therapeutic inoculation treatments for resistance to influence
  publication-title: Communication Theory, qtz004
– volume: 359
  start-page: 1094
  issue: 6380
  year: 2018
  ident: key20200110024712_B12
  article-title: The science of fake news
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.aao2998
– volume: 14
  start-page: 427
  issue: 4
  year: 2004
  ident: key20200110024712_B26
  article-title: Source Credibility and Attitude Certainty: A Metacognitive Analysis of Resistance to Persuasion
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Psychology
  doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_11
– ident: key20200110024712_B9
– volume: 77
  start-page: 281
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  ident: key20200110024712_B2
  article-title: A Meta-Analysis of Research on Inoculation Theory
  publication-title: Communication Monographs
  doi: 10.1080/03637751003758193
– volume: 70
  start-page: 153
  year: 2017
  ident: key20200110024712_B18
  article-title: Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
– volume: 5
  issue: 65
  year: 2019
  ident: key20200110024712_B24
  article-title: Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation
  publication-title: Nature Palgrave Communications
– volume: 6
  start-page: 353
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  ident: key20200110024712_B13
  article-title: Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
– start-page: 220
  year: 2013
  ident: key20200110024712_B5
  article-title: Inoculation theory
  publication-title: The Sage Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice
– volume: 29
  start-page: 97
  issue: 1
  year: 2005
  ident: key20200110024712_B7
  article-title: Inoculation theory of resistance to influence at maturity: Recent progress in theory development and application and suggestions for future research
  publication-title: Annals of the International Communication Association
  doi: 10.1080/23808985.2005.11679045
– volume: 22
  start-page: 570
  issue: 5
  year: 2018
  ident: key20200110024712_B23
  article-title: The fake news game: actively inoculating against the risk of misinformation
  publication-title: Journal of Risk Research
– volume: 72
  start-page: 414
  issue: 4
  year: 2005
  ident: key20200110024712_B21
  article-title: Inoculation and mental processing: The instrumental role of associative networks in the process of resistance to counterattitudinal influence
  publication-title: Communication Monographs
  doi: 10.1080/03637750500322578
– volume: 540
  start-page: 525
  issue: 7634
  year: 2016
  ident: key20200110024712_B11
  article-title: Post-truth: Study epidemiology of fake news
  publication-title: Nature
  doi: 10.1038/540525a
– volume: 63
  start-page: 326
  year: 1961
  ident: key20200110024712_B16
  article-title: Resistance to persuasion conferred by active and passive prior refutation of the same and alternative counterarguments
  publication-title: Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
  doi: 10.1037/h0048344
– volume: 33
  start-page: 357
  issue: 3
  year: 2007
  ident: key20200110024712_B30
  article-title: Rethinking the inoculation analogy: Effects on subjects with differing preexisting attitudes
  publication-title: Human Communication Research
  doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00303.x
– volume: 12
  issue: 5
  year: 2017
  ident: key20200110024712_B8
  article-title: Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence
  publication-title: PloS one
– volume: 2
  start-page: 156
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  ident: key20200110024712_B10
  article-title: Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense
  publication-title: Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  doi: 10.1177/2515245919847202
– volume: 188
  start-page: 39
  year: 2019
  ident: key20200110024712_B20
  article-title: Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning
  publication-title: Cognition
  doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1531
  issue: 11
  year: 2017
  ident: key20200110024712_B4
  article-title: Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation
  publication-title: Psychological Science
  doi: 10.1177/0956797617714579
– volume: 1
  start-page: 191
  year: 1964
  ident: key20200110024712_B15
  article-title: Inducing resistance against persuasion: Some contemporary approaches
  publication-title: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
  doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60052-0
– start-page: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: key20200110024712_B17
  article-title: Taking fact-checks literally but not seriously? The effects of journalistic fact-checking on factual beliefs and candidate favorability
  publication-title: Political Behavior
– volume: 85
  start-page: 423
  issue: 3
  year: 2018
  ident: key20200110024712_B29
  article-title: How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation
  publication-title: Communication Monographs
  doi: 10.1080/03637751.2018.1467564
– volume: 13
  start-page: 125
  issue: 3
  year: 2018
  ident: key20200110024712_B3
  article-title: Priming Resistance to Persuasion decreases adherence to Conspiracy Theories
  publication-title: Social Influence
  doi: 10.1080/15534510.2018.1471415
– volume: 147
  start-page: 1865
  issue: 12
  year: 2018
  ident: key20200110024712_B19
  article-title: Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
  doi: 10.1037/xge0000465
SSID ssj0002152063
Score 2.5444841
Snippet Recent research has explored the possibility of building attitudinal resistance against online misinformation through psychological inoculation. The...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 2
SubjectTerms decision making: reasoning
judgment
Title Good News about Bad News: Gamified Inoculation Boosts Confidence and Cognitive Immunity Against Fake News
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31934684
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2338058459
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6952868
https://doaj.org/article/09d681ec14144f38912bca5065ea9836
Volume 3
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwEB1BT70gvgmFYiQ4prUdx7G5dRHbFgm4UKm3aOw4sAWSit0e-u-ZSdLVLiBx4ejYSqyZsedNPH4D8Eob65xNmHukWNW0ZZOjLsrcy5bcJRatbPmH_oeP9uTMvD8vzzdKfXFO2EgPPAruUPrGOpWiMgT9Wz5V04Fp_G2Z0LtiINsmn7cRTPEezNVayfmOxYT4tunhRR8PvNryPgNJ_9-Q5e8JkhseZ34X7kxQURyNU7wHt1J3H3bXO9b1A1gc930jeJ8SQ4KxmOHYfCOO8ceiJXgpTrs-TiW6xKzvl6ul4Ft-Yy1RgV1DzSmDSJwOl0VW1-LoCy4IN4o5fkvDCx_C2fzd57cn-VQ7IY8UcKkcVVRFckG2wbqQ0HmNhtn_PC1Agk02IKaGOiWqICmq0Z4PtiK6JmGl2-IR7HR9l56AqBwaDFq7BqMJITrSo4lFaZOSoapCBq9vZFrHiVic61t8rynAYNnXJPvaqwxerMddjlQaf4yYsUrWvUx9PTwgg6gng6j_ZRAZvLxRaE1Lhc8_sEv91bLWFI5LAlylz-DxqOD1p2gnKshsTQbVluq35rLd0y2-DnTc1pfaWff0f0x-D3Y1B_SS8wyfwc7q51V6TqhnFfbh9oH8tD-Y-S-XogKD
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Good+News+about+Bad+News%3A+Gamified+Inoculation+Boosts+Confidence+and+Cognitive+Immunity+Against+Fake+News&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+cognition&rft.au=Basol%2C+Melisa&rft.au=Roozenbeek%2C+Jon&rft.au=Van+der+Linden%2C+Sander&rft.date=2020-01-10&rft.issn=2514-4820&rft.eissn=2514-4820&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2&rft_id=info:doi/10.5334%2Fjoc.91&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_5334_joc_91
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2514-4820&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2514-4820&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2514-4820&client=summon