Good News about Bad News: Gamified Inoculation Boosts Confidence and Cognitive Immunity Against Fake News
Recent research has explored the possibility of building attitudinal resistance against online misinformation through psychological inoculation. The inoculation metaphor relies on a medical analogy: by pre-emptively exposing people to weakened doses of misinformation cognitive immunity can be confer...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of cognition Vol. 3; no. 1; p. 2 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Ubiquity Press
10.01.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Recent research has explored the possibility of building attitudinal resistance against online misinformation through psychological inoculation. The inoculation metaphor relies on a medical analogy: by pre-emptively exposing people to weakened doses of misinformation cognitive immunity can be conferred. A recent example is the
game, an online fake news game in which players learn about six common misinformation techniques. We present a replication and extension into the effectiveness of
as an anti-misinformation intervention. We address three shortcomings identified in the original study: the lack of a control group, the relatively low number of test items, and the absence of attitudinal certainty measurements. Using a 2 (treatment vs. control) × 2 (pre vs. post) mixed design (N = 196) we measure participants' ability to spot misinformation techniques in 18 fake headlines before and after playing
. We find that playing
significantly improves people's ability to spot misinformation techniques compared to a gamified control group, and crucially, also increases people's level of confidence in their own judgments. Importantly, this confidence boost only occurred for those who updated their reliability assessments in the correct direction. This study offers further evidence for the effectiveness of psychological inoculation against not only specific instances of fake news, but the very strategies used in its production. Implications are discussed for inoculation theory and cognitive science research on fake news. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Recent research has explored the possibility of building attitudinal resistance against online misinformation through psychological inoculation. The inoculation metaphor relies on a medical analogy: by pre-emptively exposing people to weakened doses of misinformation cognitive immunity can be conferred. A recent example is the
game, an online fake news game in which players learn about six common misinformation techniques. We present a replication and extension into the effectiveness of
as an anti-misinformation intervention. We address three shortcomings identified in the original study: the lack of a control group, the relatively low number of test items, and the absence of attitudinal certainty measurements. Using a 2 (treatment vs. control) × 2 (pre vs. post) mixed design (N = 196) we measure participants' ability to spot misinformation techniques in 18 fake headlines before and after playing
. We find that playing
significantly improves people's ability to spot misinformation techniques compared to a gamified control group, and crucially, also increases people's level of confidence in their own judgments. Importantly, this confidence boost only occurred for those who updated their reliability assessments in the correct direction. This study offers further evidence for the effectiveness of psychological inoculation against not only specific instances of fake news, but the very strategies used in its production. Implications are discussed for inoculation theory and cognitive science research on fake news. Recent research has explored the possibility of building attitudinal resistance against online misinformation through psychological inoculation. The inoculation metaphor relies on a medical analogy: by pre-emptively exposing people to weakened doses of misinformation cognitive immunity can be conferred. A recent example is the Bad News game, an online fake news game in which players learn about six common misinformation techniques. We present a replication and extension into the effectiveness of Bad News as an anti-misinformation intervention. We address three shortcomings identified in the original study: the lack of a control group, the relatively low number of test items, and the absence of attitudinal certainty measurements. Using a 2 (treatment vs. control) × 2 (pre vs. post) mixed design (N = 196) we measure participants' ability to spot misinformation techniques in 18 fake headlines before and after playing Bad News. We find that playing Bad News significantly improves people's ability to spot misinformation techniques compared to a gamified control group, and crucially, also increases people's level of confidence in their own judgments. Importantly, this confidence boost only occurred for those who updated their reliability assessments in the correct direction. This study offers further evidence for the effectiveness of psychological inoculation against not only specific instances of fake news, but the very strategies used in its production. Implications are discussed for inoculation theory and cognitive science research on fake news.Recent research has explored the possibility of building attitudinal resistance against online misinformation through psychological inoculation. The inoculation metaphor relies on a medical analogy: by pre-emptively exposing people to weakened doses of misinformation cognitive immunity can be conferred. A recent example is the Bad News game, an online fake news game in which players learn about six common misinformation techniques. We present a replication and extension into the effectiveness of Bad News as an anti-misinformation intervention. We address three shortcomings identified in the original study: the lack of a control group, the relatively low number of test items, and the absence of attitudinal certainty measurements. Using a 2 (treatment vs. control) × 2 (pre vs. post) mixed design (N = 196) we measure participants' ability to spot misinformation techniques in 18 fake headlines before and after playing Bad News. We find that playing Bad News significantly improves people's ability to spot misinformation techniques compared to a gamified control group, and crucially, also increases people's level of confidence in their own judgments. Importantly, this confidence boost only occurred for those who updated their reliability assessments in the correct direction. This study offers further evidence for the effectiveness of psychological inoculation against not only specific instances of fake news, but the very strategies used in its production. Implications are discussed for inoculation theory and cognitive science research on fake news. Recent research has explored the possibility of building attitudinal resistance against online misinformation through psychological inoculation. The inoculation metaphor relies on a medical analogy: by pre-emptively exposing people to weakened doses of misinformation cognitive immunity can be conferred. A recent example is the Bad News game, an online fake news game in which players learn about six common misinformation techniques. We present a replication and extension into the effectiveness of Bad News as an anti-misinformation intervention. We address three shortcomings identified in the original study: the lack of a control group, the relatively low number of test items, and the absence of attitudinal certainty measurements. Using a 2 (treatment vs. control) × 2 (pre vs. post) mixed design (N = 196) we measure participants’ ability to spot misinformation techniques in 18 fake headlines before and after playing Bad News . We find that playing Bad News significantly improves people’s ability to spot misinformation techniques compared to a gamified control group, and crucially, also increases people’s level of confidence in their own judgments. Importantly, this confidence boost only occurred for those who updated their reliability assessments in the correct direction. This study offers further evidence for the effectiveness of psychological inoculation against not only specific instances of fake news, but the very strategies used in its production. Implications are discussed for inoculation theory and cognitive science research on fake news. Recent research has explored the possibility of building attitudinal resistance against online misinformation through psychological inoculation. The inoculation metaphor relies on a medical analogy: by pre-emptively exposing people to weakened doses of misinformation cognitive immunity can be conferred. A recent example is the 'Bad News' game, an online fake news game in which players learn about six common misinformation techniques. We present a replication and extension into the effectiveness of 'Bad News' as an anti-misinformation intervention. We address three shortcomings identified in the original study: the lack of a control group, the relatively low number of test items, and the absence of attitudinal certainty measurements. Using a 2 (treatment vs. control) × 2 (pre vs. post) mixed design (N = 196) we measure participants’ ability to spot misinformation techniques in 18 fake headlines before and after playing 'Bad News'. We find that playing 'Bad News' significantly improves people’s ability to spot misinformation techniques compared to a gamified control group, and crucially, also increases people’s level of confidence in their own judgments. Importantly, this confidence boost only occurred for those who updated their reliability assessments in the correct direction. This study offers further evidence for the effectiveness of psychological inoculation against not only specific instances of fake news, but the very strategies used in its production. Implications are discussed for inoculation theory and cognitive science research on fake news. |
Author | Basol, Melisa Van der Linden, Sander Roozenbeek, Jon |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Melisa surname: Basol fullname: Basol, Melisa – sequence: 2 givenname: Jon surname: Roozenbeek fullname: Roozenbeek, Jon – sequence: 3 givenname: Sander surname: Van der Linden fullname: Van der Linden, Sander |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31934684$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpdkk1vEzEQhi1UREtafgLyCXEgxV_r2ByQ2oiGSBVcytma9c4Gh127rHdb9d_XJC1qe5qvV88rzcxbchBTRELecXZaSak-b5M_tfwVORIVV3NlBDt4kh-Sk5y3jDHBK8G0fEMOJbdSaaOOSFil1NAfeJsp1Gka6Tnsyy90BX1oAzZ0HZOfOhhDivQ8pTxmukyxDQ1GjxRiU8pNDGO4Qbru-6mkd_RsAyHmkV7AH9wBj8nrFrqMJw9xRn5dfLtafp9f_lytl2eXc6-U4XPgnks0NWtrbWoEYwUoyczCLqzildI1ADZlyIDXTAstLJeMeTANwkK0ckbWe26TYOuuh9DDcOcSBLdrpGHjYBiD79Ax22jD0XPFlWqlsVzUHiqmKwRrpC6sr3vW9VT32HiM4wDdM-jzSQy_3SbdOG0rYbQpgI8PgCH9nTCPrg_ZY9dBxDRlJ6Q0rDKqskX6_qnXf5PHWxXBp73ADynnAVvnw7i7SrEOnePM_fsGV77BlZ3MyIcX8kfiC-E975mzoA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1145_3677092 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41562_024_01992_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2020_104545 crossref_primary_10_15252_embr_202052282 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18084090 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4046264 crossref_primary_10_1177_00936502241288103 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcomm_2024_1345973 crossref_primary_10_1177_01634437241265045 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15086681 crossref_primary_10_1002_asi_24954 crossref_primary_10_3390_vaccines11121848 crossref_primary_10_1177_09636625211024550 crossref_primary_10_1080_09515089_2022_2130746 crossref_primary_10_1177_1368430220965709 crossref_primary_10_3390_bs11120175 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_39807_x crossref_primary_10_1093_pnasnexus_pgad094 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41591_022_01728_z crossref_primary_10_1080_10810730_2024_2339238 crossref_primary_10_1109_TCSS_2022_3171391 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13164_024_00741_0 crossref_primary_10_2478_nispa_2023_0005 crossref_primary_10_1002_acp_4025 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0283238 crossref_primary_10_1038_d41586_022_03354_8 crossref_primary_10_1145_3677113 crossref_primary_10_37016_mr_2020_47 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2022_107643 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_30867_7 crossref_primary_10_1177_10776990211035395 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41562_020_0884_z crossref_primary_10_1080_08934215_2025_2465306 crossref_primary_10_2196_40753 crossref_primary_10_30935_cedtech_14335 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2024_108338 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42001_024_00351_x crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2314143120 crossref_primary_10_1080_10494820_2023_2299999 crossref_primary_10_1111_risa_13615 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_61232_x crossref_primary_10_1111_bjdp_12456 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_34402_6 crossref_primary_10_1177_1368430220987596 crossref_primary_10_1177_14614448211019198 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2024_1430953 crossref_primary_10_3390_vaccines11020321 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41591_022_01713_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvp_2020_101455 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_copsyc_2023_101735 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_71599_6 crossref_primary_10_1177_17470218211048986 crossref_primary_10_30658_hmc_3_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42001_021_00118_8 crossref_primary_10_2196_49255 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1930297500003570 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10462_024_10778_3 crossref_primary_10_1177_0013164420940378 crossref_primary_10_1556_112_2022_00086 crossref_primary_10_3390_encyclopedia1040091 crossref_primary_10_1080_13669877_2023_2249909 crossref_primary_10_1215_03616878_10910233 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tsc_2021_100915 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcomm_2022_824682 crossref_primary_10_36850_e12 crossref_primary_10_7326_M20_6206 crossref_primary_10_1093_tbm_ibab029 crossref_primary_10_1080_21645515_2022_2087411 crossref_primary_10_1111_pops_13057 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_paid_2021_111269 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_024_05668_4 crossref_primary_10_1080_08923647_2023_2231814 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2022_107587 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2024_105210 crossref_primary_10_3390_socsci12090470 crossref_primary_10_19132_1808_5245_29_124379 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_931865 crossref_primary_10_1080_21645515_2024_2407204 crossref_primary_10_1080_15391523_2024_2338451 crossref_primary_10_1111_acps_13290 crossref_primary_10_1080_0163853X_2022_2085477 crossref_primary_10_1017_SJP_2021_23 crossref_primary_10_1089_cyber_2023_0324 crossref_primary_10_1515_opis_2022_0132 crossref_primary_10_1111_asap_12410 crossref_primary_10_1093_joc_jqae032 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jesp_2024_104632 crossref_primary_10_1080_10463283_2021_1876983 crossref_primary_10_21240_mpaed_51_2023_01_12_X crossref_primary_10_1007_s10900_022_01100_9 crossref_primary_10_34135_mlar_23_01_04 crossref_primary_10_1177_1529100620946707 crossref_primary_10_1177_20539517211013868 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20020980 crossref_primary_10_1080_25741136_2022_2086960 crossref_primary_10_1177_00027162221087936 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2020_566790 crossref_primary_10_1002_acp_4187 crossref_primary_10_37016_mr_2020_020 crossref_primary_10_37016_mr_2020_141 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0280295 crossref_primary_10_1002_acp_4184 crossref_primary_10_12677_AAM_2022_118613 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcomm_2022_993510 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0283951 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4648332 crossref_primary_10_37016__mr_2020_008 crossref_primary_10_1145_3449080 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41562_020_0889_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2022_103687 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jarmac_2020_12_005 crossref_primary_10_1080_15228959_2023_2252322 crossref_primary_10_1515_libri_2023_0043 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2023_104832 crossref_primary_10_1145_3579520 crossref_primary_10_1177_01461672211054947 crossref_primary_10_37016_mr_2020_033 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2013249117 crossref_primary_10_1177_20563051241279253 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41060_021_00307_8 crossref_primary_10_37016_mr_2020_152 crossref_primary_10_1111_pops_12797 crossref_primary_10_37016_mr_2020_158 crossref_primary_10_1038_s44271_023_00052_7 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0140525X22002023 crossref_primary_10_1027_1864_1105_a000407 crossref_primary_10_1177_08901171211070958 crossref_primary_10_1108_TG_09_2023_0135 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcomm_2023_1106165 crossref_primary_10_1002_hec_4760 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2023_103930 crossref_primary_10_1080_17512786_2021_1991439 crossref_primary_10_1177_08901171211070957 crossref_primary_10_1145_3555589 crossref_primary_10_52586_4931 crossref_primary_10_1080_01463373_2024_2368124 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41562_024_01881_0 crossref_primary_10_1177_10755470211048480 crossref_primary_10_36850_r5 crossref_primary_10_5209_esmp_88599 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jemep_2022_100812 crossref_primary_10_1111_pops_12681 crossref_primary_10_1080_21670811_2022_2081863 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acalib_2022_102540 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10758_024_09749_y crossref_primary_10_1080_10691316_2023_2292986 crossref_primary_10_1177_00207640231178484 crossref_primary_10_1002_widm_70001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2024_105136 crossref_primary_10_1177_09610006231208027 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_024_51740_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_spc3_12602 crossref_primary_10_1177_0095327X231163265 crossref_primary_10_1027_1016_9040_a000492 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2021_106796 crossref_primary_10_1111_jasp_13049 crossref_primary_10_1177_1529100620972100 crossref_primary_10_1027_1016_9040_a000493 |
Cites_doi | 10.1177/1529100612451018 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00611.x 10.1126/science.aar4533 10.1126/science.aao2998 10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_11 10.1080/03637751003758193 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008 10.1080/23808985.2005.11679045 10.1080/03637750500322578 10.1038/540525a 10.1037/h0048344 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00303.x 10.1177/2515245919847202 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011 10.1177/0956797617714579 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60052-0 10.1080/03637751.2018.1467564 10.1080/15534510.2018.1471415 10.1037/xge0000465 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s). Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s) 2020 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s). – notice: Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s) 2020 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.5334/joc.91 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Psychology |
EISSN | 2514-4820 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_09d681ec14144f38912bca5065ea9836 PMC6952868 31934684 10_5334_joc_91 |
Genre | News |
GroupedDBID | .0O AAFWJ AAPRH AAYXX ACCQO ADBBV AFPKN ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BCNDV CITATION GROUPED_DOAJ H13 HYE IAO IER IHR ISR ITC M~E OK1 PGMZT RPM NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4481-a1c13e8b0fb68bea892a4308797941546baaedfb60a1b0626291300ca8dea72f3 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 2514-4820 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:29:36 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:28:44 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 15:49:38 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 23:00:23 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:36:39 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:00:25 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Decision making: Reasoning Judgment |
Language | English |
License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4481-a1c13e8b0fb68bea892a4308797941546baaedfb60a1b0626291300ca8dea72f3 |
Notes | content type line 23 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-1 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/09d681ec14144f38912bca5065ea9836 |
PMID | 31934684 |
PQID | 2338058459 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_09d681ec14144f38912bca5065ea9836 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6952868 proquest_miscellaneous_2338058459 pubmed_primary_31934684 crossref_citationtrail_10_5334_joc_91 crossref_primary_10_5334_joc_91 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20200110 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-01-10 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 1 year: 2020 text: 20200110 day: 10 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Journal of cognition |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Cogn |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Ubiquity Press |
Publisher_xml | – name: Ubiquity Press |
References | (key20200110024712_B1) 2019; 6 (key20200110024712_B6) 2019 (key20200110024712_B17) 2019 key20200110024712_B9 (key20200110024712_B11) 2016; 540 (key20200110024712_B23) 2018; 22 (key20200110024712_B29) 2018; 85 (key20200110024712_B25) 2019 (key20200110024712_B3) 2018; 13 (key20200110024712_B18) 2017; 70 (key20200110024712_B16) 1961; 63 (key20200110024712_B28) 2017; 358 (key20200110024712_B7) 2005; 29 (key20200110024712_B20) 2019; 188 (key20200110024712_B4) 2017; 28 (key20200110024712_B19) 2018; 147 (key20200110024712_B24) 2019; 5 (key20200110024712_B30) 2007; 33 (key20200110024712_B14) 2012; 13 (key20200110024712_B12) 2018; 359 (key20200110024712_B8) 2017; 12 (key20200110024712_B26) 2004; 14 (key20200110024712_B22) 1978; 4 (key20200110024712_B5) 2013 (key20200110024712_B2) 2010; 77 (key20200110024712_B10) 2019; 2 (key20200110024712_B13) 2017; 6 (key20200110024712_B21) 2005; 72 (key20200110024712_B15) 1964; 1 (key20200110024712_B27) 2017; 1 |
References_xml | – volume: 13 start-page: 106 issue: 3 year: 2012 ident: key20200110024712_B14 article-title: Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing publication-title: Psychological Science in the Public Interest doi: 10.1177/1529100612451018 – year: 2019 ident: key20200110024712_B25 article-title: Effective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions publication-title: Nature Human Behaviour – volume: 1 issue: 2 year: 2017 ident: key20200110024712_B27 article-title: Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change publication-title: Global Challenges – volume: 4 start-page: 217 issue: 3 year: 1978 ident: key20200110024712_B22 article-title: The effects of initial belief level on inoculation theory and its proposed mechanisms publication-title: Human Communication Research doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00611.x – volume: 358 start-page: 1141 issue: 6367 year: 2017 ident: key20200110024712_B28 article-title: Inoculating against misinformation publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.aar4533 – volume: 6 start-page: 30 year: 2019 ident: key20200110024712_B1 article-title: On WhatsApp, Rumours, and Lynchings publication-title: Economic & Political Review Weekly – year: 2019 ident: key20200110024712_B6 article-title: Prophylactic versus therapeutic inoculation treatments for resistance to influence publication-title: Communication Theory, qtz004 – volume: 359 start-page: 1094 issue: 6380 year: 2018 ident: key20200110024712_B12 article-title: The science of fake news publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.aao2998 – volume: 14 start-page: 427 issue: 4 year: 2004 ident: key20200110024712_B26 article-title: Source Credibility and Attitude Certainty: A Metacognitive Analysis of Resistance to Persuasion publication-title: Journal of Consumer Psychology doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_11 – ident: key20200110024712_B9 – volume: 77 start-page: 281 issue: 3 year: 2010 ident: key20200110024712_B2 article-title: A Meta-Analysis of Research on Inoculation Theory publication-title: Communication Monographs doi: 10.1080/03637751003758193 – volume: 70 start-page: 153 year: 2017 ident: key20200110024712_B18 article-title: Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research publication-title: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006 – volume: 5 issue: 65 year: 2019 ident: key20200110024712_B24 article-title: Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation publication-title: Nature Palgrave Communications – volume: 6 start-page: 353 issue: 4 year: 2017 ident: key20200110024712_B13 article-title: Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008 – start-page: 220 year: 2013 ident: key20200110024712_B5 article-title: Inoculation theory publication-title: The Sage Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice – volume: 29 start-page: 97 issue: 1 year: 2005 ident: key20200110024712_B7 article-title: Inoculation theory of resistance to influence at maturity: Recent progress in theory development and application and suggestions for future research publication-title: Annals of the International Communication Association doi: 10.1080/23808985.2005.11679045 – volume: 22 start-page: 570 issue: 5 year: 2018 ident: key20200110024712_B23 article-title: The fake news game: actively inoculating against the risk of misinformation publication-title: Journal of Risk Research – volume: 72 start-page: 414 issue: 4 year: 2005 ident: key20200110024712_B21 article-title: Inoculation and mental processing: The instrumental role of associative networks in the process of resistance to counterattitudinal influence publication-title: Communication Monographs doi: 10.1080/03637750500322578 – volume: 540 start-page: 525 issue: 7634 year: 2016 ident: key20200110024712_B11 article-title: Post-truth: Study epidemiology of fake news publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/540525a – volume: 63 start-page: 326 year: 1961 ident: key20200110024712_B16 article-title: Resistance to persuasion conferred by active and passive prior refutation of the same and alternative counterarguments publication-title: Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology doi: 10.1037/h0048344 – volume: 33 start-page: 357 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: key20200110024712_B30 article-title: Rethinking the inoculation analogy: Effects on subjects with differing preexisting attitudes publication-title: Human Communication Research doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00303.x – volume: 12 issue: 5 year: 2017 ident: key20200110024712_B8 article-title: Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence publication-title: PloS one – volume: 2 start-page: 156 issue: 2 year: 2019 ident: key20200110024712_B10 article-title: Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense publication-title: Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science doi: 10.1177/2515245919847202 – volume: 188 start-page: 39 year: 2019 ident: key20200110024712_B20 article-title: Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning publication-title: Cognition doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011 – volume: 28 start-page: 1531 issue: 11 year: 2017 ident: key20200110024712_B4 article-title: Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation publication-title: Psychological Science doi: 10.1177/0956797617714579 – volume: 1 start-page: 191 year: 1964 ident: key20200110024712_B15 article-title: Inducing resistance against persuasion: Some contemporary approaches publication-title: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60052-0 – start-page: 1 year: 2019 ident: key20200110024712_B17 article-title: Taking fact-checks literally but not seriously? The effects of journalistic fact-checking on factual beliefs and candidate favorability publication-title: Political Behavior – volume: 85 start-page: 423 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: key20200110024712_B29 article-title: How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation publication-title: Communication Monographs doi: 10.1080/03637751.2018.1467564 – volume: 13 start-page: 125 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: key20200110024712_B3 article-title: Priming Resistance to Persuasion decreases adherence to Conspiracy Theories publication-title: Social Influence doi: 10.1080/15534510.2018.1471415 – volume: 147 start-page: 1865 issue: 12 year: 2018 ident: key20200110024712_B19 article-title: Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General doi: 10.1037/xge0000465 |
SSID | ssj0002152063 |
Score | 2.5444841 |
Snippet | Recent research has explored the possibility of building attitudinal resistance against online misinformation through psychological inoculation. The... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 2 |
SubjectTerms | decision making: reasoning judgment |
Title | Good News about Bad News: Gamified Inoculation Boosts Confidence and Cognitive Immunity Against Fake News |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31934684 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2338058459 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6952868 https://doaj.org/article/09d681ec14144f38912bca5065ea9836 |
Volume | 3 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwEB1BT70gvgmFYiQ4prUdx7G5dRHbFgm4UKm3aOw4sAWSit0e-u-ZSdLVLiBx4ejYSqyZsedNPH4D8Eob65xNmHukWNW0ZZOjLsrcy5bcJRatbPmH_oeP9uTMvD8vzzdKfXFO2EgPPAruUPrGOpWiMgT9Wz5V04Fp_G2Z0LtiINsmn7cRTPEezNVayfmOxYT4tunhRR8PvNryPgNJ_9-Q5e8JkhseZ34X7kxQURyNU7wHt1J3H3bXO9b1A1gc930jeJ8SQ4KxmOHYfCOO8ceiJXgpTrs-TiW6xKzvl6ul4Ft-Yy1RgV1DzSmDSJwOl0VW1-LoCy4IN4o5fkvDCx_C2fzd57cn-VQ7IY8UcKkcVVRFckG2wbqQ0HmNhtn_PC1Agk02IKaGOiWqICmq0Z4PtiK6JmGl2-IR7HR9l56AqBwaDFq7BqMJITrSo4lFaZOSoapCBq9vZFrHiVic61t8rynAYNnXJPvaqwxerMddjlQaf4yYsUrWvUx9PTwgg6gng6j_ZRAZvLxRaE1Lhc8_sEv91bLWFI5LAlylz-DxqOD1p2gnKshsTQbVluq35rLd0y2-DnTc1pfaWff0f0x-D3Y1B_SS8wyfwc7q51V6TqhnFfbh9oH8tD-Y-S-XogKD |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Good+News+about+Bad+News%3A+Gamified+Inoculation+Boosts+Confidence+and+Cognitive+Immunity+Against+Fake+News&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+cognition&rft.au=Basol%2C+Melisa&rft.au=Roozenbeek%2C+Jon&rft.au=Van+der+Linden%2C+Sander&rft.date=2020-01-10&rft.issn=2514-4820&rft.eissn=2514-4820&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2&rft_id=info:doi/10.5334%2Fjoc.91&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_5334_joc_91 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2514-4820&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2514-4820&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2514-4820&client=summon |