Stiffness properties of the human lumbar spine: A lumped parameter model
Objective. To characterise with a mechanical model, the force–displacement response of the human lumbar spine to postero–anterior loading. Design. Single case with repetition. Background. Previous attempts to characterise the spine's force–displacement response have been simplistic and only con...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) Vol. 16; no. 4; pp. 285 - 292 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01.05.2001
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0268-0033 1879-1271 |
DOI | 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objective. To characterise with a mechanical model, the force–displacement response of the human lumbar spine to postero–anterior loading.
Design. Single case with repetition.
Background. Previous attempts to characterise the spine's force–displacement response have been simplistic and only considered the loading curve. These approaches ignored valuable information such as viscosity, non-linear elasticity and inertia of the lumbar spine.
Methods. The Spinal Assessment Machine applied a postero–anterior load to the spines of 23 asymptomatic subjects and measured the force–displacement response. The data was analysed by two methods; by a traditional linear regression of part of the loading curve and by a new method where an equation including non-linear stiffness and damping was used to characterise the whole force–displacement relationship.
Results. The equation developed was found to account for virtually all of the variance in the raw data (
R
2>0.993). Four elements derived by the equation determine the contributions of linear elasticity, non-linear elasticity, linear viscosity and non-linear viscosity to the overall stiffness.
Conclusions. Considering the excellent fit of the new equation to the raw data and its poor correlation with existing measures, it is proposed that the traditional measures provide an incomplete description of the force–displacement response.
Relevance
Therapists use their perception of the force–displacement response of the spine to select the type of manipulative treatment to apply. To study this aspect of patient care, devices capable of measuring spinal stiffness have been developed, however to date the obtained data has been analysed only simply. A lumped parameter mechanical model incorporating non-linear damping and stiffness provides a more complete description of the force–displacement response and thus may offer added insight into the manipulative treatment of spinal pain. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To characterise with a mechanical model, the force-displacement response of the human lumbar spine to postero-anterior loading.
Single case with repetition.
Previous attempts to characterise the spine's force-displacement response have been simplistic and only considered the loading curve. These approaches ignored valuable information such as viscosity, non-linear elasticity and inertia of the lumbar spine.
The Spinal Assessment Machine applied a postero-anterior load to the spines of 23 asymptomatic subjects and measured the force-displacement response. The data was analysed by two methods; by a traditional linear regression of part of the loading curve and by a new method where an equation including non-linear stiffness and damping was used to characterise the whole force-displacement relationship.
The equation developed was found to account for virtually all of the variance in the raw data (R2 > 0.993). Four elements derived by the equation determine the contributions of linear elasticity, non-linear elasticity, linear viscosity and non-linear viscosity to the overall stiffness.
Considering the excellent fit of the new equation to the raw data and its poor correlation with existing measures, it is proposed that the traditional measures provide an incomplete description of the force-displacement response. Relevance. Therapists use their perception of the force-displacement response of the spine to select the type of manipulative treatment to apply. To study this aspect of patient care, devices capable of measuring spinal stiffness have been developed, however to date the obtained data has been analysed only simply. A lumped parameter mechanical model incorporating non-linear damping and stiffness provides a more complete description of the force-displacement response and thus may offer added insight into the manipulative treatment of spinal pain. Objective. To characterise with a mechanical model, the force–displacement response of the human lumbar spine to postero–anterior loading. Design. Single case with repetition. Background. Previous attempts to characterise the spine's force–displacement response have been simplistic and only considered the loading curve. These approaches ignored valuable information such as viscosity, non-linear elasticity and inertia of the lumbar spine. Methods. The Spinal Assessment Machine applied a postero–anterior load to the spines of 23 asymptomatic subjects and measured the force–displacement response. The data was analysed by two methods; by a traditional linear regression of part of the loading curve and by a new method where an equation including non-linear stiffness and damping was used to characterise the whole force–displacement relationship. Results. The equation developed was found to account for virtually all of the variance in the raw data ( R 2>0.993). Four elements derived by the equation determine the contributions of linear elasticity, non-linear elasticity, linear viscosity and non-linear viscosity to the overall stiffness. Conclusions. Considering the excellent fit of the new equation to the raw data and its poor correlation with existing measures, it is proposed that the traditional measures provide an incomplete description of the force–displacement response. Relevance Therapists use their perception of the force–displacement response of the spine to select the type of manipulative treatment to apply. To study this aspect of patient care, devices capable of measuring spinal stiffness have been developed, however to date the obtained data has been analysed only simply. A lumped parameter mechanical model incorporating non-linear damping and stiffness provides a more complete description of the force–displacement response and thus may offer added insight into the manipulative treatment of spinal pain. Objective: To characterise with a mechanical model, the force-displacement response of the human lumbar spine to postero- anterior loading. Design: Single case with repetition. Background: Previous attempts to characterise the spine's force-displacement response have been simplistic and only considered the loading curve. These approaches ignored valuable information such as viscosity, non-linear elasticity and inertia of the lumbar spine. Methods: The Spinal Assessment Machine applied a postero-anterior load to the spines of 23 asymptomatic subjects and measured the force-displacement response. The data was analysed by two methods; by a traditional linear regression of part of the loading curve and by a new method where an equation including non-linear stiffness and damping was used to characterise the whole force- displacement relationship. Results: The equation developed was found to account for virtually all of the variance in the raw data (R(2) greater than 0.993). Four elements derived by the equation determine the contributions of linear elasticity, non-linear elasticity, linear viscosity and non-linear viscosity to the overall stiffness. Conclusions: Considering the excellent fit of the new equation to the raw data and its poor correlation with existing measures, it is proposed that the traditional measures provide an incomplete description of the force-displacement response. Relevance: Therapists use their perception of the force- displacement response of the spine to select the type of manipulative treatment to apply. To study this aspect of patient care, devices capable of measuring spinal stiffness have been developed, however to date the obtained data has been analysed only simply. A lumped parameter mechanical model incorporating non-linear damping and stiffness provides a more complete description of the (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED). To characterise with a mechanical model, the force-displacement response of the human lumbar spine to postero-anterior loading.OBJECTIVETo characterise with a mechanical model, the force-displacement response of the human lumbar spine to postero-anterior loading.Single case with repetition.DESIGNSingle case with repetition.Previous attempts to characterise the spine's force-displacement response have been simplistic and only considered the loading curve. These approaches ignored valuable information such as viscosity, non-linear elasticity and inertia of the lumbar spine.BACKGROUNDPrevious attempts to characterise the spine's force-displacement response have been simplistic and only considered the loading curve. These approaches ignored valuable information such as viscosity, non-linear elasticity and inertia of the lumbar spine.The Spinal Assessment Machine applied a postero-anterior load to the spines of 23 asymptomatic subjects and measured the force-displacement response. The data was analysed by two methods; by a traditional linear regression of part of the loading curve and by a new method where an equation including non-linear stiffness and damping was used to characterise the whole force-displacement relationship.METHODSThe Spinal Assessment Machine applied a postero-anterior load to the spines of 23 asymptomatic subjects and measured the force-displacement response. The data was analysed by two methods; by a traditional linear regression of part of the loading curve and by a new method where an equation including non-linear stiffness and damping was used to characterise the whole force-displacement relationship.The equation developed was found to account for virtually all of the variance in the raw data (R2 > 0.993). Four elements derived by the equation determine the contributions of linear elasticity, non-linear elasticity, linear viscosity and non-linear viscosity to the overall stiffness.RESULTSThe equation developed was found to account for virtually all of the variance in the raw data (R2 > 0.993). Four elements derived by the equation determine the contributions of linear elasticity, non-linear elasticity, linear viscosity and non-linear viscosity to the overall stiffness.Considering the excellent fit of the new equation to the raw data and its poor correlation with existing measures, it is proposed that the traditional measures provide an incomplete description of the force-displacement response. Relevance. Therapists use their perception of the force-displacement response of the spine to select the type of manipulative treatment to apply. To study this aspect of patient care, devices capable of measuring spinal stiffness have been developed, however to date the obtained data has been analysed only simply. A lumped parameter mechanical model incorporating non-linear damping and stiffness provides a more complete description of the force-displacement response and thus may offer added insight into the manipulative treatment of spinal pain.CONCLUSIONSConsidering the excellent fit of the new equation to the raw data and its poor correlation with existing measures, it is proposed that the traditional measures provide an incomplete description of the force-displacement response. Relevance. Therapists use their perception of the force-displacement response of the spine to select the type of manipulative treatment to apply. To study this aspect of patient care, devices capable of measuring spinal stiffness have been developed, however to date the obtained data has been analysed only simply. A lumped parameter mechanical model incorporating non-linear damping and stiffness provides a more complete description of the force-displacement response and thus may offer added insight into the manipulative treatment of spinal pain. |
Author | Nicholson, Leslie Maher, Christopher Adams, Roger Phan-Thien, Nhan |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Leslie surname: Nicholson fullname: Nicholson, Leslie email: l.nicholson@cchs.usyd.edu.au organization: The School of Physiotherapy, The Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, East Street, P.O. Box 170, Lidcombe, New South Wales 2141, Australia – sequence: 2 givenname: Christopher surname: Maher fullname: Maher, Christopher organization: The School of Physiotherapy, The Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, East Street, P.O. Box 170, Lidcombe, New South Wales 2141, Australia – sequence: 3 givenname: Roger surname: Adams fullname: Adams, Roger organization: The School of Physiotherapy, The Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, East Street, P.O. Box 170, Lidcombe, New South Wales 2141, Australia – sequence: 4 givenname: Nhan surname: Phan-Thien fullname: Phan-Thien, Nhan organization: The Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Singapore, Singapore |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11358615$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkc1rFTEUxYNU7Gv1T1Cy8mMxeu-bmSSjiJSiVii4qK5DJrmh0fkyyQj9783rq110Yd0kBH7n5N5zjtjBNE_E2FOE1wgo3lzAVqgKoK5fArwCQJQVPGAbVLKrcCvxgG1ukUN2lNIPAGi2rXzEDhHrVglsN-zsIgfvJ0qJL3FeKOZAic-e50vil-toJj6sY28iT0uY6C0_2b0Xcnwx0YyUKfJxdjQ8Zg-9GRI9ubmP2fdPH7-dnlXnXz9_OT05r2zTyFwp57zqhewE1VaKxnam632DHh147IwCIYxVjXA9tqLuUIElkBLLLq7sWB-zF3vfMu6vlVLWY0iWhsFMNK9JF7TpWqXaQj7_NwlKiRawgM9uwLUfyeklhtHEK_03pQK82wM2zilF8tqGbHKYpxxNGDSC3nWirzvRu8DLoa870VDU7R317Qf36D7sdVTi_B0o6mQDTZZciGSzdnO41-H9HQc7hClYM_ykq__Q_wE707Rm |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_math_2007_03_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmpt_2010_08_020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmpt_2006_03_006 crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0b013e31817f93f9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spinee_2013_07_480 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmpt_2018_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jelekin_2012_04_015 crossref_primary_10_1088_1757_899X_294_1_012087 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jelekin_2012_04_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_math_2007_09_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0161_4754_03_00070_8 crossref_primary_10_1054_math_2001_0431 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmpt_2009_04_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pmrj_2016_12_001 crossref_primary_10_1109_TMECH_2011_2159807 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jelekin_2011_07_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_msksp_2018_04_005 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/jor.1100050402 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60633-4 10.1016/S0268-0033(97)00023-5 10.1054/math.1997.0295 10.1088/0143-0815/11/3/002 10.1093/ptj/74.9.801 10.1093/ptj/76.2.158 10.1054/math.1996.0277 10.1097/00007632-199712010-00004 10.1093/ptj/78.8.829 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60426-8 10.1054/math.1999.0197 10.1093/ptj/75.3.212 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1879-1271 |
EndPage | 292 |
ExternalDocumentID | 11358615 10_1016_S0268_0033_00_00117_0 S0268003300001170 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .FO .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 29B 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5VS 6PF 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AABNK AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AATTM AAWTL AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABFNM ABJNI ABMAC ABMZM ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFS ACIEU ACIUM ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV C45 CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HEE HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ H~9 IHE J1W KOM M29 M31 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OH. OT. OVD OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 QZG R2- ROL RPZ SAE SCC SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SEW SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K TEORI UAP UPT WH7 WUQ Z5R ~G- AACTN AAIAV AFCTW AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW RIG YCJ AAYXX AGRNS CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-8ddf8b6796e3c764c9a9bf41f1d0f19a8066ac846db15639180ce0771026d1173 |
IEDL.DBID | AIKHN |
ISSN | 0268-0033 |
IngestDate | Mon Jul 21 11:52:55 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 05 10:10:25 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:26:26 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:24:26 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:57 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 16 04:30:27 EDT 2024 Tue Aug 26 19:12:25 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | Viscosity Perception Measurements Stiffness and tests |
Language | English |
License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c447t-8ddf8b6796e3c764c9a9bf41f1d0f19a8066ac846db15639180ce0771026d1173 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
PMID | 11358615 |
PQID | 70886501 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_771495885 proquest_miscellaneous_70886501 pubmed_primary_11358615 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_S0268_0033_00_00117_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0268_0033_00_00117_0 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_S0268_0033_00_00117_0 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_S0268_0033_00_00117_0 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2001-05-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2001-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2001 text: 2001-05-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) |
PublicationYear | 2001 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd |
References | Maitland (BIB1) 1986 Latimer, Goodsell, Lee, Maher, Wilkinson, Moran (BIB4) 1996; 76 Lee, Svensson (BIB3) 1990; 11 Wright, Dowson, Longfield (BIB14) 1969; 4 Lee M, Gal J, Herzog W. Biomechanics of manual therapy. In: Dvir Z, editor. Clinical biomechanics. Pennsylvania: USA; 2000. p. 209–38 [chapter 9] Maher, Latimer, Holland (BIB5) 1999; 4 Fung Y. Stress strain relations of soft tissues in simple elongation. In: Fung Y, Perrone N, Anliker M, editors. Biomechanics its foundations and objectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1972 Refshauge K, Latimer J. The physical examination. In: Refshauge K, Gass E, editors. Musculoskeletal physiotherapy: clinical science and practice. Oxford: Butterworth-heinemann; 1995. p. 111–15 Viner, Lee, Adams (BIB9) 1997; 22 Nicholson, Adams, Maher (BIB26) 1997; 2 Keller, Spengler, Hansson (BIB17) 1987; 5 Maher, Latimer, Adams (BIB24) 1998; 78 Simmonds, Kumar, Lechelt (BIB12) 1995; 75 Johns, Wright (BIB16) 1964; 2 Harms, Bader (BIB13) 1997; 12 Lee, Svensson (BIB7) 1993; 16 Latimer, Lee, Adams (BIB11) 1998; 21 Wright, Johns (BIB15) 1960; 106 Viner, Lee (BIB19) 1995; 18 Allison, Edmondston, Roe, Reid, Toy, Lundgren (BIB10) 1998; 21 Munro, Visintainer, Page (BIB21) 1986 Lee, Liversidge (BIB6) 1994; 17 Matyas, Bach (BIB27) 1985; 31 Maher, Adams (BIB28) 1994; 74 Latimer, Holland, Lee, Adams (BIB20) 1997; 20 Maher, Adams (BIB25) 1995; 41 Beaumont A, McCrumb C, Lee M. Differences in the postero–anterior stiffness of the lumbar spine during tidal breathing and breath holding. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Conference of the Manipulative Physiotherapists Association of Australia. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; 1991. p. 244–51 Latimer, Lee, Adams (BIB23) 1996; 1 Maher (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB25) 1995; 41 Johns (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB16) 1964; 2 Maher (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB28) 1994; 74 Latimer (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB20) 1997; 20 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB18 Maher (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB5) 1999; 4 Wright (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB15) 1960; 106 Simmonds (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB12) 1995; 75 Latimer (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB23) 1996; 1 Lee (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB7) 1993; 16 Harms (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB13) 1997; 12 Allison (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB10) 1998; 21 Maher (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB24) 1998; 78 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB22 Latimer (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB11) 1998; 21 Nicholson (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB26) 1997; 2 Maitland (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB1) 1986 Viner (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB19) 1995; 18 Matyas (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB27) 1985; 31 Lee (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB3) 1990; 11 Keller (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB17) 1987; 5 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB8 Wright (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB14) 1969; 4 Munro (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB21) 1986 Latimer (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB4) 1996; 76 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB2 Lee (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB6) 1994; 17 Viner (10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB9) 1997; 22 |
References_xml | – volume: 76 start-page: 158 year: 1996 end-page: 165 ident: BIB4 article-title: Evaluation of a new device for measuring responses to postero–anterior forces in a patient population, Part 1: Reliability testing publication-title: Phys Ther – volume: 11 start-page: 201 year: 1990 end-page: 207 ident: BIB3 article-title: Measurement of stiffness during simulated spinal physiotherapy publication-title: Clin Phys Physiol Measurement – volume: 4 start-page: 145 year: 1999 end-page: 150 ident: BIB5 article-title: Plinth padding confounds measures of posteroanterior spinal stiffness publication-title: Manual Ther – volume: 4 start-page: 8 year: 1969 end-page: 14 ident: BIB14 article-title: Joint stiffness – Its characterisation and significance publication-title: Biomed Eng – volume: 17 start-page: 511 year: 1994 end-page: 516 ident: BIB6 article-title: Posteroanterior stiffness at three locations in the lumbar spine publication-title: J Manipulative Physiol Ther – volume: 2 start-page: 87 year: 1964 end-page: 95 ident: BIB16 article-title: An analytical description of joint stiffness publication-title: Biorehology – volume: 21 start-page: 534 year: 1998 end-page: 538 ident: BIB10 article-title: Influence of load orientation on the posterior stiffness of the lumbar spine publication-title: J Manipulative Physiol Ther – volume: 2 start-page: 150 year: 1997 end-page: 156 ident: BIB26 article-title: Reliability of a discrimination measure for judgements of non-biological stiffness publication-title: Manual Ther – volume: 74 start-page: 801 year: 1994 end-page: 811 ident: BIB28 article-title: Reliability of pain and stiffness assessments in clinical manual lumbar spine examination publication-title: Phys Ther – volume: 16 start-page: 439 year: 1993 end-page: 446 ident: BIB7 article-title: Effect of loading frequency on response of the spine to lumbar posteroanterior forces publication-title: J Manipulative Physiol Ther – reference: Lee M, Gal J, Herzog W. Biomechanics of manual therapy. In: Dvir Z, editor. Clinical biomechanics. Pennsylvania: USA; 2000. p. 209–38 [chapter 9] – year: 1986 ident: BIB21 publication-title: Statistical methods for health care research – volume: 75 start-page: 212 year: 1995 end-page: 222 ident: BIB12 article-title: Use of a spinal model to quantify the forces and motion that occur during therapists' tests of spinal motion publication-title: Phys Ther – volume: 1 start-page: 266 year: 1996 end-page: 270 ident: BIB23 article-title: The effect of training with feedback on physiotherapy students' ability to judge lumbar stiffness publication-title: Manual Ther – volume: 5 start-page: 467 year: 1987 end-page: 478 ident: BIB17 article-title: Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar spine. I. Creep analysis during static compressive loading publication-title: J Orthop Res – reference: Fung Y. Stress strain relations of soft tissues in simple elongation. In: Fung Y, Perrone N, Anliker M, editors. Biomechanics its foundations and objectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1972 – reference: Beaumont A, McCrumb C, Lee M. Differences in the postero–anterior stiffness of the lumbar spine during tidal breathing and breath holding. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Conference of the Manipulative Physiotherapists Association of Australia. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; 1991. p. 244–51 – volume: 106 start-page: 215 year: 1960 end-page: 231 ident: BIB15 article-title: Physical factors concerned with the stiffness of normal and diseased joints publication-title: Bull St Johns Hopkins Hosp – volume: 22 start-page: 2724 year: 1997 end-page: 2730 ident: BIB9 article-title: Posteroanterior stiffness in the lumbosacral spine. The correlation between adjacent vertebral levels publication-title: Spine – volume: 78 start-page: 829 year: 1998 end-page: 837 ident: BIB24 article-title: An investigation of the reliability and validity of a reference-based protocol for judging posteroanterior spinal stiffness publication-title: Phys Ther – year: 1986 ident: BIB1 publication-title: Vertebral manipulation – volume: 12 start-page: 393 year: 1997 end-page: 399 ident: BIB13 article-title: Variability of forces applied by experienced therapists during spinal mobilisation publication-title: Clin Biomech – volume: 21 start-page: 157 year: 1998 end-page: 163 ident: BIB11 article-title: The effects of high and low loading forces on measured values of lumbar stiffness publication-title: J Manipulative Physiol Ther – volume: 18 start-page: 441 year: 1995 end-page: 447 ident: BIB19 article-title: Direction of manual force applied during assessment of stiffness in the lumbosacral spine publication-title: J Manipulative Physiol Ther – reference: Refshauge K, Latimer J. The physical examination. In: Refshauge K, Gass E, editors. Musculoskeletal physiotherapy: clinical science and practice. Oxford: Butterworth-heinemann; 1995. p. 111–15 – volume: 31 start-page: 175 year: 1985 end-page: 198 ident: BIB27 article-title: The reliability of selected techniques in clinical arthrometrics publication-title: Aust J Physiother – volume: 41 start-page: 161 year: 1995 end-page: 167 ident: BIB25 article-title: A psychophysical evaluation of manual stiffness discrimination publication-title: Aust J Physiother – volume: 20 start-page: 315 year: 1997 end-page: 319 ident: BIB20 article-title: Plinth padding and measures of posteroanterior lumbar stiffness publication-title: J Manipulative Physiol Ther – ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB22 – volume: 20 start-page: 315 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB20 article-title: Plinth padding and measures of posteroanterior lumbar stiffness publication-title: J Manipulative Physiol Ther – volume: 5 start-page: 467 year: 1987 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB17 article-title: Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar spine. I. Creep analysis during static compressive loading publication-title: J Orthop Res doi: 10.1002/jor.1100050402 – ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB18 – volume: 31 start-page: 175 year: 1985 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB27 article-title: The reliability of selected techniques in clinical arthrometrics publication-title: Aust J Physiother doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60633-4 – volume: 12 start-page: 393 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB13 article-title: Variability of forces applied by experienced therapists during spinal mobilisation publication-title: Clin Biomech doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(97)00023-5 – volume: 17 start-page: 511 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB6 article-title: Posteroanterior stiffness at three locations in the lumbar spine publication-title: J Manipulative Physiol Ther – volume: 4 start-page: 8 year: 1969 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB14 article-title: Joint stiffness – Its characterisation and significance publication-title: Biomed Eng – volume: 2 start-page: 150 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB26 article-title: Reliability of a discrimination measure for judgements of non-biological stiffness publication-title: Manual Ther doi: 10.1054/math.1997.0295 – volume: 11 start-page: 201 year: 1990 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB3 article-title: Measurement of stiffness during simulated spinal physiotherapy publication-title: Clin Phys Physiol Measurement doi: 10.1088/0143-0815/11/3/002 – volume: 18 start-page: 441 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB19 article-title: Direction of manual force applied during assessment of stiffness in the lumbosacral spine publication-title: J Manipulative Physiol Ther – year: 1986 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB21 – volume: 74 start-page: 801 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB28 article-title: Reliability of pain and stiffness assessments in clinical manual lumbar spine examination publication-title: Phys Ther doi: 10.1093/ptj/74.9.801 – volume: 76 start-page: 158 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB4 article-title: Evaluation of a new device for measuring responses to postero–anterior forces in a patient population, Part 1: Reliability testing publication-title: Phys Ther doi: 10.1093/ptj/76.2.158 – volume: 1 start-page: 266 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB23 article-title: The effect of training with feedback on physiotherapy students' ability to judge lumbar stiffness publication-title: Manual Ther doi: 10.1054/math.1996.0277 – year: 1986 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB1 – volume: 106 start-page: 215 year: 1960 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB15 article-title: Physical factors concerned with the stiffness of normal and diseased joints publication-title: Bull St Johns Hopkins Hosp – volume: 2 start-page: 87 year: 1964 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB16 article-title: An analytical description of joint stiffness publication-title: Biorehology – volume: 16 start-page: 439 year: 1993 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB7 article-title: Effect of loading frequency on response of the spine to lumbar posteroanterior forces publication-title: J Manipulative Physiol Ther – ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB2 – ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB8 – volume: 21 start-page: 157 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB11 article-title: The effects of high and low loading forces on measured values of lumbar stiffness publication-title: J Manipulative Physiol Ther – volume: 21 start-page: 534 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB10 article-title: Influence of load orientation on the posterior stiffness of the lumbar spine publication-title: J Manipulative Physiol Ther – volume: 22 start-page: 2724 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB9 article-title: Posteroanterior stiffness in the lumbosacral spine. The correlation between adjacent vertebral levels publication-title: Spine doi: 10.1097/00007632-199712010-00004 – volume: 78 start-page: 829 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB24 article-title: An investigation of the reliability and validity of a reference-based protocol for judging posteroanterior spinal stiffness publication-title: Phys Ther doi: 10.1093/ptj/78.8.829 – volume: 41 start-page: 161 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB25 article-title: A psychophysical evaluation of manual stiffness discrimination publication-title: Aust J Physiother doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60426-8 – volume: 4 start-page: 145 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB5 article-title: Plinth padding confounds measures of posteroanterior spinal stiffness publication-title: Manual Ther doi: 10.1054/math.1999.0197 – volume: 75 start-page: 212 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0_BIB12 article-title: Use of a spinal model to quantify the forces and motion that occur during therapists' tests of spinal motion publication-title: Phys Ther doi: 10.1093/ptj/75.3.212 |
SSID | ssj0004257 |
Score | 1.725701 |
Snippet | Objective. To characterise with a mechanical model, the force–displacement response of the human lumbar spine to postero–anterior loading.
Design. Single case... To characterise with a mechanical model, the force-displacement response of the human lumbar spine to postero-anterior loading. Single case with repetition.... To characterise with a mechanical model, the force-displacement response of the human lumbar spine to postero-anterior loading.OBJECTIVETo characterise with a... Objective: To characterise with a mechanical model, the force-displacement response of the human lumbar spine to postero- anterior loading. Design: Single case... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 285 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Elasticity Female Humans Linear Models Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology Male Measurements Middle Aged Perception Stiffness and tests Stress, Mechanical Viscosity |
Title | Stiffness properties of the human lumbar spine: A lumped parameter model |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0268003300001170 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00117-0 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11358615 https://www.proquest.com/docview/70886501 https://www.proquest.com/docview/771495885 |
Volume | 16 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwEB7RRap6QS20ZfugPiDUHsLam4ed3lYItAXBBZC4RY4f0kqQjZblwKW_vTOOw4rDiopLpFgey5nYM9-MxzMA-0qmlo_rceJR96CB4k2ivROJo_JHRe4y5cg1cH5RTK-z05v8ZgOO-rswFFYZZX8n04O0ji2jyM1RO5uNLtF6UFSKLDiohUS7fXOcloUawObkz9n0YnU9Mib8xP4JEawu8nSDhMafnP8K4yR8nYpaB0GDKjp5D1sRQ7JJN80PsOGabdiZNGg_3z2yAxaiOoO7fBvensfD8x2YXi5n3pNoYy254BeUS5XNPUMMyEKtPoaSqtYLdt8iwW82offWWUb5we8oboaFwjkf4frk-OpomsRCConJMrlMlLVe1eQxcqmRRWZKXdY-E15Y7kWpFeIObRCJ2BrNubQUihvHJYGPwiJL0k8waOaN2wWWaWHT0he6kAgMyrrkelznuK2N9agEzRCynneViVnGqdjFbbUKJ0OWU0rSFB8hpE5WfAiHT2Rtl2bjJYKi_zFVf4cUpV6FiuAlQvVE-Gyh_Q_pj34FVLgJ6WRFN27-cF9JlNUIdcUQ2LoekkxRpfIhfO7Wzuo7RZorBJZfXj-zr_Cui42jQMxvMFguHtx3BEvLeg_eHP4Ve3FL_ANNCwg5 |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9swDCaKFNh2GbZ2j-xVHYZhO3iRYtmSdwuKFe7a5NIW6M2QZQkI0DpGmh7270fKcoMdgg67GLAgCjItkR8pigT4rFXa8Gk9TTzqHjRQvE2MdyJxVP4oz5zUjlwD80VeXslf19n1HhwPd2EorDLK_l6mB2kdWyaRm5NuuZxcoPWgqRRZcFALhXb7PmWnkiPYn52elYvt9ciY8BP7J0SwvcjTDxIav3L-LYyT8F0qahcEDaro5AU8jxiSzfppvoQ91x7A4axF-_n2N_vCQlRncJcfwJN5PDw_hPJis_SeRBvryAW_plyqbOUZYkAWavUxlFS1WbO7Dgl-sBm9d65hlB_8luJmWCic8wquTn5eHpdJLKSQWCnVJtFN43VNHiOXWpVLW5ii9lJ40XAvCqMRdxiLSKSp0ZxLC6G5dVwR-MgbZEn6GkbtqnVvgUkjmrTwuckVAoOiLriZ1hlua9t4VIJ2DHLgXWVjlnEqdnFTbcPJkOWUkjTFRwipUxUfw_cHsq5Ps_EYQT78mGq4Q4pSr0JF8BihfiD8a6H9C-nRsAIq3IR0smJat7q_qxTKaoS6YgxsVw9FpqjW2Rje9Gtn-50izTQCy3f_P7MjeFpezs-r89PF2Xt41sfJUVDmBxht1vfuIwKnTf0pbow_iwUKIQ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stiffness+properties+of+the+human+lumbar+spine%3A+A+lumped+parameter+model&rft.jtitle=Clinical+biomechanics+%28Bristol%29&rft.au=Nicholson%2C+Leslie&rft.au=Maher%2C+Christopher&rft.au=Adams%2C+Roger&rft.au=Phan-Thien%2C+Nhan&rft.date=2001-05-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=0268-0033&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=292&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2FS0268-0033%2800%2900117-0&rft.externalDocID=S0268003300001170 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0268-0033&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0268-0033&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0268-0033&client=summon |