Apparent Diffusion Coefficient to Subdivide Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (BI-RADS-MRI) Category 4 Lesions

BACKGROUND This study aims to subdivide BI-RADS-MRI (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging) Category 4 lesions and to evaluate the role of Fischer's scoring system, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and Fischer's + ADC in differential diagnosis of breast l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedical science monitor Vol. 24; pp. 2180 - 2188
Main Authors Liu, Dandan, Ba, Zhaogui, Ni, Xiaoli, Wang, Linhong, Yu, Dexin, Ma, Xiangxing
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States International Scientific Literature, Inc 12.04.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract BACKGROUND This study aims to subdivide BI-RADS-MRI (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging) Category 4 lesions and to evaluate the role of Fischer's scoring system, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and Fischer's + ADC in differential diagnosis of breast lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 143 patients (150 breast lesions), who were diagnosed by biopsy, and received dynamic contrast enhancement and diffusion-weighted imaging. The diagnostic efficacies of ADC, Fischer's scoring system, and the Fischer's + ADC were analyzed by the receiver operating characteristics curve. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Fischer's scoring system and the Fischer's + ADC were used to subdivide BI-RADS Category 4 breast lesions. RESULTS ADC value was negatively correlated with the tumor grade. The AUC of Fischer's + ADC (0.949) was significantly higher than that of ADC (0.855) and Fischer's (0.912) (P=0.0008 and 0.001, respectively). Scored by Fischer's scoring system, Category 4 and 5 indicated a likely malignant threshold with sensitivity and specificity of 98.70% and 65.75%, respectively. Scored by the Fischer's + ADC method, Category 4B and 4C indicated a likely malignant threshold with sensitivity of 97.40% and specificity of 82.19%. Kappa values were 0.63 (ADC), 0.65 (Fischer's), and 0.80 (Fischer's + ADC), respectively. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS 4A, 4B, and 4C were 7.69%, 52.38% and 89.29%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Fischer's scoring system combined with ADC could reasonably subdivide Category 4 breast lesions with high specificity and sensitivity.
AbstractList BACKGROUND This study aims to subdivide BI-RADS-MRI (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging) Category 4 lesions and to evaluate the role of Fischer's scoring system, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and Fischer's + ADC in differential diagnosis of breast lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 143 patients (150 breast lesions), who were diagnosed by biopsy, and received dynamic contrast enhancement and diffusion-weighted imaging. The diagnostic efficacies of ADC, Fischer's scoring system, and the Fischer's + ADC were analyzed by the receiver operating characteristics curve. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Fischer's scoring system and the Fischer's + ADC were used to subdivide BI-RADS Category 4 breast lesions. RESULTS ADC value was negatively correlated with the tumor grade. The AUC of Fischer's + ADC (0.949) was significantly higher than that of ADC (0.855) and Fischer's (0.912) (P=0.0008 and 0.001, respectively). Scored by Fischer's scoring system, Category 4 and 5 indicated a likely malignant threshold with sensitivity and specificity of 98.70% and 65.75%, respectively. Scored by the Fischer's + ADC method, Category 4B and 4C indicated a likely malignant threshold with sensitivity of 97.40% and specificity of 82.19%. Kappa values were 0.63 (ADC), 0.65 (Fischer's), and 0.80 (Fischer's + ADC), respectively. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS 4A, 4B, and 4C were 7.69%, 52.38% and 89.29%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Fischer's scoring system combined with ADC could reasonably subdivide Category 4 breast lesions with high specificity and sensitivity.BACKGROUND This study aims to subdivide BI-RADS-MRI (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging) Category 4 lesions and to evaluate the role of Fischer's scoring system, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and Fischer's + ADC in differential diagnosis of breast lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 143 patients (150 breast lesions), who were diagnosed by biopsy, and received dynamic contrast enhancement and diffusion-weighted imaging. The diagnostic efficacies of ADC, Fischer's scoring system, and the Fischer's + ADC were analyzed by the receiver operating characteristics curve. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Fischer's scoring system and the Fischer's + ADC were used to subdivide BI-RADS Category 4 breast lesions. RESULTS ADC value was negatively correlated with the tumor grade. The AUC of Fischer's + ADC (0.949) was significantly higher than that of ADC (0.855) and Fischer's (0.912) (P=0.0008 and 0.001, respectively). Scored by Fischer's scoring system, Category 4 and 5 indicated a likely malignant threshold with sensitivity and specificity of 98.70% and 65.75%, respectively. Scored by the Fischer's + ADC method, Category 4B and 4C indicated a likely malignant threshold with sensitivity of 97.40% and specificity of 82.19%. Kappa values were 0.63 (ADC), 0.65 (Fischer's), and 0.80 (Fischer's + ADC), respectively. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS 4A, 4B, and 4C were 7.69%, 52.38% and 89.29%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Fischer's scoring system combined with ADC could reasonably subdivide Category 4 breast lesions with high specificity and sensitivity.
BACKGROUND This study aims to subdivide BI-RADS-MRI (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging) Category 4 lesions and to evaluate the role of Fischer's scoring system, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and Fischer's + ADC in differential diagnosis of breast lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 143 patients (150 breast lesions), who were diagnosed by biopsy, and received dynamic contrast enhancement and diffusion-weighted imaging. The diagnostic efficacies of ADC, Fischer's scoring system, and the Fischer's + ADC were analyzed by the receiver operating characteristics curve. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Fischer's scoring system and the Fischer's + ADC were used to subdivide BI-RADS Category 4 breast lesions. RESULTS ADC value was negatively correlated with the tumor grade. The AUC of Fischer's + ADC (0.949) was significantly higher than that of ADC (0.855) and Fischer's (0.912) (P=0.0008 and 0.001, respectively). Scored by Fischer's scoring system, Category 4 and 5 indicated a likely malignant threshold with sensitivity and specificity of 98.70% and 65.75%, respectively. Scored by the Fischer's + ADC method, Category 4B and 4C indicated a likely malignant threshold with sensitivity of 97.40% and specificity of 82.19%. Kappa values were 0.63 (ADC), 0.65 (Fischer's), and 0.80 (Fischer's + ADC), respectively. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS 4A, 4B, and 4C were 7.69%, 52.38% and 89.29%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Fischer's scoring system combined with ADC could reasonably subdivide Category 4 breast lesions with high specificity and sensitivity.
Author Ba, Zhaogui
Yu, Dexin
Wang, Linhong
Liu, Dandan
Ni, Xiaoli
Ma, Xiangxing
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
2 Department of Radiology, Laigang Hospital Affiliated to Taishan Medical University, Laiwu, Shandong, P.R. China
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Department of Radiology, Laigang Hospital Affiliated to Taishan Medical University, Laiwu, Shandong, P.R. China
– name: 1 Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Dandan
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Dandan
  organization: Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland)
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Zhaogui
  surname: Ba
  fullname: Ba, Zhaogui
  organization: Department of Radiology, Laigang Hospital Affiliated to Taishan Medical University, Laiwu, Shandong, China (mainland)
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Xiaoli
  surname: Ni
  fullname: Ni, Xiaoli
  organization: Department of Radiology, Laigang Hospital Affiliated to Taishan Medical University, Laiwu, Shandong, China (mainland)
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Linhong
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Linhong
  organization: Department of Radiology, Laigang Hospital Affiliated to Taishan Medical University, Laiwu, Shandong, China (mainland)
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Dexin
  surname: Yu
  fullname: Yu, Dexin
  organization: Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland)
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Xiangxing
  surname: Ma
  fullname: Ma, Xiangxing
  organization: Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland)
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29644993$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptUVuPEyEUJmaNe9En3w2Pa8ysDANMeTHptqs2aWPS6jOhzJkRM4VZYDbpv_AnS7e7m9UYHs7h8F2A7xydOO8AobcluSqp4PLjarO6kqQmhLxAZ6VgVVHVnJw860_ReYy_CKETQfgrdEqlYEzK6gz9ng6DDuASntu2HaP1Ds88tK019jBNHm_GbWPvbAP4OoCOCS92urOuw2sYfEiHTrsGz3XSeLOPCXZ4pTsHyZoMid5pZ-CJdHm9KNbT-aZYrRfv8Uwn6HzYY4aXcDCPr9HLVvcR3jzUC_Tj88332ddi-e3LYjZdFoaxOhUVtLxptpK3k4oJKjSXgoAmwlR1SSu5ZRNgsm6BAisbWnEQxpC8yrwTTVNdoE9H3WHc7qAx-bFB92oIdqfDXnlt1d8nzv5Unb9TXJaM1jwLXD4IBH87QkxqZ6OBvtcO_BgVJTTflBM5ydB3z72eTB5jyIDyCDDBxxigVcYmnfJ_ZGvbq5Ko-6hVjlodo86cD_9wHmX_h_4DXHGqXg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_27435
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12880_023_01144_w
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11604_020_01029_w
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_020_06883_w
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_27362
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_45079_2
crossref_primary_10_1097_RCT_0000000000001108
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0232856
crossref_primary_10_5937_medi57_45107
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2020_109322
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Med Sci Monit, 2018 2018
Copyright_xml – notice: Med Sci Monit, 2018 2018
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.12659/MSM.907000
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1643-3750
EndPage 2188
ExternalDocumentID PMC5914275
29644993
10_12659_MSM_907000
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
2WC
3EA
53G
5GY
AAKDD
AAYXX
ABMXE
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AEGXH
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
CITATION
E3Z
EMOBN
F5P
GX1
HYE
KQ8
M48
OK1
PGMZT
RPM
SJN
SV3
XSB
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
M~E
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-3ef5ddb95f834626a5960ea06c371239b48e497fe2e41d235e6cc0c0c11d26dd3
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1643-3750
1234-1010
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 14:00:55 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 11:28:46 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 28 08:40:20 EDT 2024
Tue Jul 01 04:32:25 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:56:31 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Language English
License This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c447t-3ef5ddb95f834626a5960ea06c371239b48e497fe2e41d235e6cc0c0c11d26dd3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Funds Collection
Data Interpretation
Dandan Liu and Zhaogui Ba contributed equally to this work
Literature Search
Data Collection
Study Design
Manuscript Preparation
Statistical Analysis
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.12659/MSM.907000
PMID 29644993
PQID 2024475098
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5914275
proquest_miscellaneous_2024475098
pubmed_primary_29644993
crossref_citationtrail_10_12659_MSM_907000
crossref_primary_10_12659_MSM_907000
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-04-12
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-04-12
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-04-12
  day: 12
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Medical science monitor
PublicationTitleAlternate Med Sci Monit
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: International Scientific Literature, Inc
SSID ssj0028605
Score 2.2651165
Snippet BACKGROUND This study aims to subdivide BI-RADS-MRI (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging) Category 4 lesions and to evaluate...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 2180
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Area Under Curve
Biopsy
Breast - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Contrast Media
Diagnosis, Differential
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Female
Humans
Medical Technology
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading - methods
Retrospective Studies
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity
Title Apparent Diffusion Coefficient to Subdivide Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (BI-RADS-MRI) Category 4 Lesions
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29644993
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2024475098
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5914275
Volume 24
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZKkRAXxLtbHjJSD4CUsonHSXxAqN2l6iLCoWWl3qIkHkOlkpTdrET_BT-ZGScbsaUnlEseY0fyeOxvbM83Quyh9zvQMvOxCiAcq8BoC4EBRAXKhpU_jJl9iY_n8OlMn22JdTLOvgGXN7p2nE9qvrjY__Xz6gMZ_HvPjRBr8y47zfbJySPrviVu05SUsIVmMGwnRGkXIEmjNNC4E477QL1rhZkY2BA-MEZtzlL_QM_rJyj_mpKO7ot7PZaUB53yH4gtrB-KO1m_W_5I_CaIybFerZyeO7fidTE5adCTRvDbtpE0bviALJSHfDq9lbMfPm2R7IA53xW1ldOiLWRHbi6z4lvNkY-SV_6ZrgOHQq8PZ8HJwfQ0yE5mb-SESSiaxZUE-Rn558vHYn708evkOOgzMAQVQNIGCp22tjTapQrI9Sk0OTxYjONKJdSYpoQUwSQOI4TQRkpjXFVjukJ6iq1VT8R23dS4I6QmKaiMNaW1EDpXWheFZQkGHUFKp0fi7brF86qnJ-csGRc5uymsqZw0lXeaGom9QfiyY-W4WezVWnU5WQ1vhRQ1NqtlHhE0AQZL6Ug87VQ5VLTuAyORbCh5EGBG7s0v9fl3z8ytTQhRonf_u-QzcZcQWRp4MsnnYrtdrPAFoZ62fOl79B_GzAFH
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Apparent+Diffusion+Coefficient+to+Subdivide+Breast+Imaging+Reporting+and+Data+System+Magnetic+Resonance+Imaging+%28BI-RADS-MRI%29+Category+4+Lesions&rft.jtitle=Medical+science+monitor&rft.au=Liu%2C+Dandan&rft.au=Ba%2C+Zhaogui&rft.au=Ni%2C+Xiaoli&rft.au=Wang%2C+Linhong&rft.date=2018-04-12&rft.pub=International+Scientific+Literature%2C+Inc&rft.issn=1234-1010&rft.eissn=1643-3750&rft.volume=24&rft.spage=2180&rft.epage=2188&rft_id=info:doi/10.12659%2FMSM.907000&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F29644993&rft.externalDocID=PMC5914275
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1643-3750&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1643-3750&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1643-3750&client=summon