The Journey Ahead: Thirteen Teachers Report How the Internet Influences Literacy and Literacy Instruction in Their K-12 Classrooms

The purpose of this study was to explore 13 K-12 teachers' reports of how the Internet influenced literacy and literacy instruction in their classrooms. The teachers, including ten women and three men, represented 11 different states in the U. S. and were considered exemplary at using technolog...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inReading research quarterly Vol. 36; no. 4; pp. 442 - 466
Main Author Karchmer, Rachel A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.2001
International Reading Association
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0034-0553
1936-2722
DOI10.1598/RRQ.36.4.5

Cover

Abstract The purpose of this study was to explore 13 K-12 teachers' reports of how the Internet influenced literacy and literacy instruction in their classrooms. The teachers, including ten women and three men, represented 11 different states in the U. S. and were considered exemplary at using technology by their colleagues. Labbo and Reinking's (1999) notion of multiple realities in relation to new technologies provided a framework for understanding the participants' perspectives of the Internet's relationship to literacy and literacy instruction. Constant-comparative analysis of data, including e-mail interviews, participants' reflective journals, Web pages, online articles, and lesson plans revealed three areas of focus: (a) the appropriateness of Internet material, (b) evaluating the accuracy of Internet material, and (c) publishing student work on the Internet. Findings indicated that the teachers viewed the Internet's influence on reading as an extension of traditional literacy skills. In addition, the elementary teachers noticed an increase in their students' motivation to write when their work was published on the Internet for a greater audience. However, the secondary teachers did not find this the case. Implications for teacher technology preparation and literacy research are discussed in light of the lessons learned from this study. /// [Spanish] El propósito de este estudio fue explorar los informes de 13 docentes K-12 acerca de cómo la Internet influenció la alfabetización y la enseñanza de la lectoescritura en sus aulas. Los docentes, diez mujeres y tres hombres, representaban 11 estados diferentes de los Estados Unidos y eran considerados por sus colegas un ejemplo en el uso de la tecnología. La noción de realidades múltiples en relación con las nuevas tecnologías formulada por Labbo y Reinking (1999) proporcionó un marco para comprender las perspectivas de los participantes sobre la relación entre la Internet y la alfabetización y la enseñanza de la lectoescritura. Análisis comparativos de datos que incluyeron entrevistas por correo electrónico, diarios de reflexiones de los participantes, páginas de la red, artículos on-line y planificaciones de clases revelaron tres áreas de interés: (a) adecuación del material de la Internet, (b) evaluación de la precisión del material de la Internet y (c) publicación del trabajo de los estudiantes en la Internet. Los resultados indicaron que los docentes veían la influencia de la Internet sobre la lectura como una extensión de las habilidades tradicionales de lectoescritura. Asimismo, los docentes primarios percibieron un aumento en la motivación de los estudiantes para escribir cuando su trabajo se publicaba en la Internet para una audiencia mayor. Sin embargo, los docentes secundarios no hallaron esto. Se discuten las implicancias para la capacitación tecnológica de los docentes y la investigación en alfabetización a la luz de lo aprendido a partir de este estudio. /// [German] Zweck dieser Studie war das Auswerten von 13 K-12 Lehrerberichten darüber, wie das Internet den Schreib- und Leseunterricht in ihren Klassenräumen beeinflußt. Die Lehrer, einschließlich zehn Frauen und drei Männern, repräsentierten 11 verschiedene Staaten in den USA und galten bei ihren Kollegen als beispielhaft in der Technologienutzung. Der Begriff der multiplen Realitäten in Relation zu neuen Technologien von Labbo und Reinking (1999) lieferte einen Rahmen zum Verständnis der Teilnehmerperspektiven in Verbindung zum Schreiben und Lesen und Schreib- und Leseuterricht des Internet. Die konstant-komparative Analyse der Daten, einschließlich Email Interviews, reflektive Journale von Teilnehmern, Webseiten, On-Line Artikel, und Unterrichtspläne ergaben drei Brennpunktbereiche: (a) Die Zweckmäßigkeit bzw. Angemessenheit von Internetmaterial, (b) Bewertung der Genauigkeit von Internetmaterial, und (c) Veröffentlichen von Schülerarbeiten im Internet. Die Erkenntnisse weisen daraufhin, daß die Lehrer den Einfluß des Internet auf das Lesen als eine Ergänzung traditioneller Schreib- und Lesefertigkeiten ansahen. Zusätzlich erkannten die Grundschullehrer eine Steigerung in der Motivation ihrer Schüler zum Schreiben, wenn ihre Arbeiten im Internet für ein größeres Publikum veröffentlicht wurden. Die Oberschullehrer stellten dies jedoch nicht fest. Auswirkungen auf die Technologievorbereitung und Schreib- und Leseforschung für Lehrer werden im Hinblick auf die aus dieser Studie gemachten Erfahrungen diskutiert. /// [French] Cette étude avait pour but d'explorer les rapports de 13 enseignants, du jardin d'enfants au baccalauréat, sur la façon dont internet affecte la littératie et l'enseignement de la littératie dans leur classe. Ces enseignants, dix femmes et trois hommes, représentent 11 États différents des USA et sont considérés comme exemplaires par leurs collègues en ce qui concerne l'utilisation de la technologie. La notion de réalités multiples en rapport avec les nouvelles technologies de Labbo et Reinking (1999) a fourni une structure pour comprendre les perspectives des participants en ce qui concerne la relation d'internet à la littératie et à l'enseignement de la littératie. Une analyse comparative commune des données, comportant des entretiens par e-mail, des journaux de réflexion des participants, des pages web, des articles en ligne, et des plans de cours, ont fait apparaître trois domaines de préoccupation: a) la pertinence du matériel d'internet, b) l'évaluation de la précision du matériel d'internet, et c) la publication du travail des élèves sur internet. Les résultats indiquent que les enseignants considèrent l'influence d'internet sur la lecture comme une extension des compétences traditionnelles de littératie. De plus, les enseignants du primaire remarquent une augmentation de la motivation de leurs étudiants à écrire quand leur travail est publié sur internet à destination d'un plus grand public. Cependant, les professeurs du second degré ne trouvent que ce soit le cas. À la lumière des leçons tirées de cette étude, la discussion porte sur les implications pour la formation technologique des enseignants et sur la recherche en littératie. /// [Cyrillic] В задачи данного исследования входило изучение мнений тринадцати учителей, работающих с детьми различных возрастов, о влиянии Интернета на чтение учащихся и обучение литературе. Коллеги считают, что эти учителя (десять женщин и трое мужчин, представляющие 11 американских штатов) преуспели в использовании компьютерных технологий при обучении. Положение о возникновении множественных реалий благодаря новым технологиям (Лаббо и Рейнкинг, 1999) помогает понять, под каким углом зрения участники опроса рассматривают влияние Интеренета на чтение и преподавание литературы. Постоянно-сравнительный анализ данных, в том числе: интервью, полученных посредством электронной почты; дневниковых записей участников; веб-страниц; статей в режиме онлайн и планов уроков -- дал возможность выделить три аспекта, представляющие особый интерес, (а) уместность применения Интернет-материалов, (б) оценка точности материалов, представленных в Интернете и (в) публикация ученических работ в Интеренете. Как выяснилось, учителя считают, что Интернет расширяет традиционные навыки общения с печатным словом. Кроме того, учителя начальной школы -- в отличие от средней -- отмечают, что дети охотнее пишут, зная, что их произведения обретут широкую аудиторию на страницах Интернета. В свете полученных данных обсуждается необходимость технологической подготовки учителей и проведения смежных исследований в области чтения и письма.
AbstractList The purpose of this study was to explore 13 K-12 teachers' reports of how the Internet influenced literacy and literacy instruction in their classrooms. The teachers, all considered by their colleagues to be exemplary at using technology, shared stories describing if and how the Internet changed the way they viewed reading and writing in their classrooms.
The purpose of this study was to explore 13 K‐12 teachers' reports of how the Internet influenced literacy and literacy instruction in their classrooms. The teachers, including ten women and three men, represented 11 different states in the U.S. and were considered exemplary at using technology by their colleagues. Labbo and Reinking's (1999) notion of multiple realities in relation to new technologies provided a framework for understanding the participants' perspectives of the Internet's relationship to literacy and literacy instruction. Constant‐comparative analysis of data, including e‐mail interviews, participants' reflective journals, Web pages, online articles, and lesson plans revealed three areas of focus: (a) the appropriateness of Internet material, (b) evaluating the accuracy of Internet material, and (c) publishing student work on the Internet. Findings indicated that the teachers viewed the Internet's influence on reading as an extension of traditional literacy skills. In addition, the elementary teachers noticed an increase in their students' motivation to write when their work was published on the Internet for a greater audience. However, the secondary teachers did not find this the case. Implications for teacher technology preparation and literacy research are discussed in light of the lessons learned from this study. El propósito de este estudio fue explorar los informes de 13 docentes K‐12 acerca de cómo la Internet influenció la alfabetización y la enseñanza de la lectoescritura en sus aulas. Los docentes, diez mujeres y tres hombres, representaban 11 estados diferentes de los Estados Unidos y eran considerados por sus colegas un ejemplo en el uso de la tecnología. La noción de realidades múltiples en relación con las nuevas tecnologías formulada por Labbo y Reinking (1999) proporcionó un marco para comprender las perspectivas de los participantes sobre la relación entre la Internet y la alfabetización y la enseñanza de la lectoescritura. Análisis comparativos de datos que incluyeron entrevistas por correo electrónico, diarios de reflexiones de los participantes, páginas de la red, artículos on‐line y planificaciones de clases revelaron tres áreas de interés: (a) adecuación del material de la Internet, (b) evaluación de la precisión del material de la Internet y (c) publicación del trabajo de los estudiantes en la Internet. Los resultados indicaron que los docentes veían la influencia de la Internet sobre la lectura como una extensión de las habilidades tradicionales de lectoescritura. Asimismo, los docentes primarios percibieron un aumento en la motivación de los estudiantes para escribir cuando su trabajo se publicaba en la Internet para una audiencia mayor. Sin embargo, los docentes secundarios no hallaron esto. Se discuten las implicancias para la capacitación tecnológica de los docentes y la investigación en alfabetización a la luz de lo aprendido a partir de este estudio. Schreib und Leseunterricht in K‐12 Klassen beeinflußt dieser Studie war das Auswerten von 13 K‐12 Lehrerberichten darüber, wie das Internet den Schreib‐ und Leseunterricht in ihren Klassenräumen beeinflußt. Die Lehrer, einschließlich zehn Frauen und drei Männern, repräsentierten 11 verschiedene Staaten in den USA und galten bei ihren Kollegen als beispielhaft in der Technologienutzung. Der Begriff der multiplen Realitäten in Relation zu neuen Technologien von Labbo und Reinking (1999) lieferte einen Rahmen zum Verständnis der Teilnehmerperspektiven in Verbindung zum Schreiben und Lesen und Schreib‐ und Leseuterricht des Internet. Die konstant‐komparative Analyse der Daten, einschließlich Email Interviews, reflektive Journale von Teilnehmern, Webseiten, On‐Line Artikel, und Unterrichtspläne ergaben drei Brennpunktbereiche: (a) Die Zweckmäßigkeit bzw. Angemessenheit von Internetmaterial, (b) Bewertung der Genauigkeit von Internetmaterial, und (c) Veröffentlichen von Schülerarbeiten im Internet. Die Erkenntnisse weisen daraufhin, daß die Lehrer den Einfluß des Internet auf das Lesen als eine Ergänzung traditioneller Schreib‐ und Lesefertigkeiten ansahen. Zusätzlich erkannten die Grundschullehrer eine Steigerung in der Motivation ihrer Schüler zum Schreiben, wenn ihre Arbeiten im Internet für ein größeres Publikum veröffentlicht wurden. Die Oberschullehrer stellten dies jedoch nicht fest. Auswirkungen auf die Technologievorbereitung und Schreib‐ und Leseforschung für Lehrer werden im Hinblick auf die aus dieser Studie gemachten Erfahrungen diskutiert. Cette étude avait pour but d'explorer les rapports de 13 enseignants, du jardin d'enfants au baccalauréat, sur la façon dont internet affecte la littératie et l'enseignement de la littératie dans leur classe. Ces enseignants, dix femmes et trois hommes, représentent 11 États différents des USA et sont considérés comme exemplaires par leurs collègues en ce qui concerne l'utilisation de la technologie. La notion de réalités multiples en rapport avec les nouvelles technologies de Labbo et Reinking (1999) a fourni une structure pour comprendre les perspectives des participants en ce qui concerne la relation d'internet à la littératie et à l'enseignement de la littératie. Une analyse comparative commune des données, comportant des entretiens par email, des journaux de réflexion des participants, des pages web, des articles en ligne, et des plans de cours, ont fait apparaître trois domaines de préoccupation: a) la pertinence du matériel d'internet, b) l'évaluation de la précision du matériel d'internet, et c) la publication du travail des élèves sur internet. Les résultats indiquent que les enseignants considèrent l'influence d'internet sur la lecture comme une extension des compétences traditionnelles de littératie. De plus, les enseignants du primaire remarquent une augmentation de la motivation de leurs étudiants à écrire quand leur travail est publié sur internet à destination d'un plus grand public. Cependant, les professeurs du second degré ne trouvent que ce soit le cas. À la lumière des leçons tirées de cette étude, la discussion porte sur les implications pour la formation technologique des enseignants et sur la recherche en littératie.
The purpose of this study was to explore 13 K-12 teachers' reports of how the Internet influenced literacy & literacy instruction in their classrooms. The teachers, including 10 women & 3 men, represented 11 different states in the US & were considered exemplary at using technology by their colleagues. Labbo & Reinking's (1999) notion of multiple realities in relation to new technologies provided a framework for understanding the participants' perspectives of the Internet's relationship to literacy & literacy instruction. Constant-comparative analysis of data, including e-mail interviews, participants' reflective journals, Web pages, online articles, & lesson plans revealed three areas of focus (1) the appropriateness of Internet material, (2) evaluating the accuracy of Internet material, & (3) publishing student work on the Internet. Findings indicated that the teachers viewed the Internet's influence on reading as an extension of traditional literacy skills. In addition, the elementary teachers noticed an increase in their students' motivation to write when their work was published on the Internet for a greater audience. However, the secondary teachers did not find this the case. Implications for teacher technology preparation & literacy research are discussed in light of the lessons learned from the study. 2 Tables, 1 Figure, 71 References. Adapted from the source document
The purpose of this study was to explore 13 K-12 teachers' reports of how the Internet influenced literacy and literacy instruction in their classrooms. The teachers, including ten women and three men, represented 11 different states in the U. S. and were considered exemplary at using technology by their colleagues. Labbo and Reinking's (1999) notion of multiple realities in relation to new technologies provided a framework for understanding the participants' perspectives of the Internet's relationship to literacy and literacy instruction. Constant-comparative analysis of data, including e-mail interviews, participants' reflective journals, Web pages, online articles, and lesson plans revealed three areas of focus: (a) the appropriateness of Internet material, (b) evaluating the accuracy of Internet material, and (c) publishing student work on the Internet. Findings indicated that the teachers viewed the Internet's influence on reading as an extension of traditional literacy skills. In addition, the elementary teachers noticed an increase in their students' motivation to write when their work was published on the Internet for a greater audience. However, the secondary teachers did not find this the case. Implications for teacher technology preparation and literacy research are discussed in light of the lessons learned from this study. /// [Spanish] El propósito de este estudio fue explorar los informes de 13 docentes K-12 acerca de cómo la Internet influenció la alfabetización y la enseñanza de la lectoescritura en sus aulas. Los docentes, diez mujeres y tres hombres, representaban 11 estados diferentes de los Estados Unidos y eran considerados por sus colegas un ejemplo en el uso de la tecnología. La noción de realidades múltiples en relación con las nuevas tecnologías formulada por Labbo y Reinking (1999) proporcionó un marco para comprender las perspectivas de los participantes sobre la relación entre la Internet y la alfabetización y la enseñanza de la lectoescritura. Análisis comparativos de datos que incluyeron entrevistas por correo electrónico, diarios de reflexiones de los participantes, páginas de la red, artículos on-line y planificaciones de clases revelaron tres áreas de interés: (a) adecuación del material de la Internet, (b) evaluación de la precisión del material de la Internet y (c) publicación del trabajo de los estudiantes en la Internet. Los resultados indicaron que los docentes veían la influencia de la Internet sobre la lectura como una extensión de las habilidades tradicionales de lectoescritura. Asimismo, los docentes primarios percibieron un aumento en la motivación de los estudiantes para escribir cuando su trabajo se publicaba en la Internet para una audiencia mayor. Sin embargo, los docentes secundarios no hallaron esto. Se discuten las implicancias para la capacitación tecnológica de los docentes y la investigación en alfabetización a la luz de lo aprendido a partir de este estudio. /// [German] Zweck dieser Studie war das Auswerten von 13 K-12 Lehrerberichten darüber, wie das Internet den Schreib- und Leseunterricht in ihren Klassenräumen beeinflußt. Die Lehrer, einschließlich zehn Frauen und drei Männern, repräsentierten 11 verschiedene Staaten in den USA und galten bei ihren Kollegen als beispielhaft in der Technologienutzung. Der Begriff der multiplen Realitäten in Relation zu neuen Technologien von Labbo und Reinking (1999) lieferte einen Rahmen zum Verständnis der Teilnehmerperspektiven in Verbindung zum Schreiben und Lesen und Schreib- und Leseuterricht des Internet. Die konstant-komparative Analyse der Daten, einschließlich Email Interviews, reflektive Journale von Teilnehmern, Webseiten, On-Line Artikel, und Unterrichtspläne ergaben drei Brennpunktbereiche: (a) Die Zweckmäßigkeit bzw. Angemessenheit von Internetmaterial, (b) Bewertung der Genauigkeit von Internetmaterial, und (c) Veröffentlichen von Schülerarbeiten im Internet. Die Erkenntnisse weisen daraufhin, daß die Lehrer den Einfluß des Internet auf das Lesen als eine Ergänzung traditioneller Schreib- und Lesefertigkeiten ansahen. Zusätzlich erkannten die Grundschullehrer eine Steigerung in der Motivation ihrer Schüler zum Schreiben, wenn ihre Arbeiten im Internet für ein größeres Publikum veröffentlicht wurden. Die Oberschullehrer stellten dies jedoch nicht fest. Auswirkungen auf die Technologievorbereitung und Schreib- und Leseforschung für Lehrer werden im Hinblick auf die aus dieser Studie gemachten Erfahrungen diskutiert. /// [French] Cette étude avait pour but d'explorer les rapports de 13 enseignants, du jardin d'enfants au baccalauréat, sur la façon dont internet affecte la littératie et l'enseignement de la littératie dans leur classe. Ces enseignants, dix femmes et trois hommes, représentent 11 États différents des USA et sont considérés comme exemplaires par leurs collègues en ce qui concerne l'utilisation de la technologie. La notion de réalités multiples en rapport avec les nouvelles technologies de Labbo et Reinking (1999) a fourni une structure pour comprendre les perspectives des participants en ce qui concerne la relation d'internet à la littératie et à l'enseignement de la littératie. Une analyse comparative commune des données, comportant des entretiens par e-mail, des journaux de réflexion des participants, des pages web, des articles en ligne, et des plans de cours, ont fait apparaître trois domaines de préoccupation: a) la pertinence du matériel d'internet, b) l'évaluation de la précision du matériel d'internet, et c) la publication du travail des élèves sur internet. Les résultats indiquent que les enseignants considèrent l'influence d'internet sur la lecture comme une extension des compétences traditionnelles de littératie. De plus, les enseignants du primaire remarquent une augmentation de la motivation de leurs étudiants à écrire quand leur travail est publié sur internet à destination d'un plus grand public. Cependant, les professeurs du second degré ne trouvent que ce soit le cas. À la lumière des leçons tirées de cette étude, la discussion porte sur les implications pour la formation technologique des enseignants et sur la recherche en littératie. /// [Cyrillic] В задачи данного исследования входило изучение мнений тринадцати учителей, работающих с детьми различных возрастов, о влиянии Интернета на чтение учащихся и обучение литературе. Коллеги считают, что эти учителя (десять женщин и трое мужчин, представляющие 11 американских штатов) преуспели в использовании компьютерных технологий при обучении. Положение о возникновении множественных реалий благодаря новым технологиям (Лаббо и Рейнкинг, 1999) помогает понять, под каким углом зрения участники опроса рассматривают влияние Интеренета на чтение и преподавание литературы. Постоянно-сравнительный анализ данных, в том числе: интервью, полученных посредством электронной почты; дневниковых записей участников; веб-страниц; статей в режиме онлайн и планов уроков -- дал возможность выделить три аспекта, представляющие особый интерес, (а) уместность применения Интернет-материалов, (б) оценка точности материалов, представленных в Интернете и (в) публикация ученических работ в Интеренете. Как выяснилось, учителя считают, что Интернет расширяет традиционные навыки общения с печатным словом. Кроме того, учителя начальной школы -- в отличие от средней -- отмечают, что дети охотнее пишут, зная, что их произведения обретут широкую аудиторию на страницах Интернета. В свете полученных данных обсуждается необходимость технологической подготовки учителей и проведения смежных исследований в области чтения и письма.
ABSTRACTS The purpose of this study was to explore 13 K‐12 teachers' reports of how the Internet influenced literacy and literacy instruction in their classrooms. The teachers, including ten women and three men, represented 11 different states in the U.S. and were considered exemplary at using technology by their colleagues. Labbo and Reinking's (1999) notion of multiple realities in relation to new technologies provided a framework for understanding the participants' perspectives of the Internet's relationship to literacy and literacy instruction. Constant‐comparative analysis of data, including e‐mail interviews, participants' reflective journals, Web pages, online articles, and lesson plans revealed three areas of focus: (a) the appropriateness of Internet material, (b) evaluating the accuracy of Internet material, and (c) publishing student work on the Internet. Findings indicated that the teachers viewed the Internet's influence on reading as an extension of traditional literacy skills. In addition, the elementary teachers noticed an increase in their students' motivation to write when their work was published on the Internet for a greater audience. However, the secondary teachers did not find this the case. Implications for teacher technology preparation and literacy research are discussed in light of the lessons learned from this study. El propósito de este estudio fue explorar los informes de 13 docentes K‐12 acerca de cómo la Internet influenció la alfabetización y la enseñanza de la lectoescritura en sus aulas. Los docentes, diez mujeres y tres hombres, representaban 11 estados diferentes de los Estados Unidos y eran considerados por sus colegas un ejemplo en el uso de la tecnología. La noción de realidades múltiples en relación con las nuevas tecnologías formulada por Labbo y Reinking (1999) proporcionó un marco para comprender las perspectivas de los participantes sobre la relación entre la Internet y la alfabetización y la enseñanza de la lectoescritura. Análisis comparativos de datos que incluyeron entrevistas por correo electrónico, diarios de reflexiones de los participantes, páginas de la red, artículos on‐line y planificaciones de clases revelaron tres áreas de interés: (a) adecuación del material de la Internet, (b) evaluación de la precisión del material de la Internet y (c) publicación del trabajo de los estudiantes en la Internet. Los resultados indicaron que los docentes veían la influencia de la Internet sobre la lectura como una extensión de las habilidades tradicionales de lectoescritura. Asimismo, los docentes primarios percibieron un aumento en la motivación de los estudiantes para escribir cuando su trabajo se publicaba en la Internet para una audiencia mayor. Sin embargo, los docentes secundarios no hallaron esto. Se discuten las implicancias para la capacitación tecnológica de los docentes y la investigación en alfabetización a la luz de lo aprendido a partir de este estudio. Schreib und Leseunterricht in K‐12 Klassen beeinflußt dieser Studie war das Auswerten von 13 K‐12 Lehrerberichten darüber, wie das Internet den Schreib‐ und Leseunterricht in ihren Klassenräumen beeinflußt. Die Lehrer, einschließlich zehn Frauen und drei Männern, repräsentierten 11 verschiedene Staaten in den USA und galten bei ihren Kollegen als beispielhaft in der Technologienutzung. Der Begriff der multiplen Realitäten in Relation zu neuen Technologien von Labbo und Reinking (1999) lieferte einen Rahmen zum Verständnis der Teilnehmerperspektiven in Verbindung zum Schreiben und Lesen und Schreib‐ und Leseuterricht des Internet. Die konstant‐komparative Analyse der Daten, einschließlich Email Interviews, reflektive Journale von Teilnehmern, Webseiten, On‐Line Artikel, und Unterrichtspläne ergaben drei Brennpunktbereiche: (a) Die Zweckmäßigkeit bzw. Angemessenheit von Internetmaterial, (b) Bewertung der Genauigkeit von Internetmaterial, und (c) Veröffentlichen von Schülerarbeiten im Internet. Die Erkenntnisse weisen daraufhin, daß die Lehrer den Einfluß des Internet auf das Lesen als eine Ergänzung traditioneller Schreib‐ und Lesefertigkeiten ansahen. Zusätzlich erkannten die Grundschullehrer eine Steigerung in der Motivation ihrer Schüler zum Schreiben, wenn ihre Arbeiten im Internet für ein größeres Publikum veröffentlicht wurden. Die Oberschullehrer stellten dies jedoch nicht fest. Auswirkungen auf die Technologievorbereitung und Schreib‐ und Leseforschung für Lehrer werden im Hinblick auf die aus dieser Studie gemachten Erfahrungen diskutiert. Cette étude avait pour but d'explorer les rapports de 13 enseignants, du jardin d'enfants au baccalauréat, sur la façon dont internet affecte la littératie et l'enseignement de la littératie dans leur classe. Ces enseignants, dix femmes et trois hommes, représentent 11 États différents des USA et sont considérés comme exemplaires par leurs collègues en ce qui concerne l'utilisation de la technologie. La notion de réalités multiples en rapport avec les nouvelles technologies de Labbo et Reinking (1999) a fourni une structure pour comprendre les perspectives des participants en ce qui concerne la relation d'internet à la littératie et à l'enseignement de la littératie. Une analyse comparative commune des données, comportant des entretiens par email, des journaux de réflexion des participants, des pages web, des articles en ligne, et des plans de cours, ont fait apparaître trois domaines de préoccupation: a) la pertinence du matériel d'internet, b) l'évaluation de la précision du matériel d'internet, et c) la publication du travail des élèves sur internet. Les résultats indiquent que les enseignants considèrent l'influence d'internet sur la lecture comme une extension des compétences traditionnelles de littératie. De plus, les enseignants du primaire remarquent une augmentation de la motivation de leurs étudiants à écrire quand leur travail est publié sur internet à destination d'un plus grand public. Cependant, les professeurs du second degré ne trouvent que ce soit le cas. À la lumière des leçons tirées de cette étude, la discussion porte sur les implications pour la formation technologique des enseignants et sur la recherche en littératie.
Author Karchmer, Rachel A.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Rachel A.
  surname: Karchmer
  fullname: Karchmer, Rachel A.
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14200427$$DView record in Pascal Francis
BookMark eNqNkcuLUzEUxi8ygp3RjVs3QdCFcGue9-FuKLZTp77KFd2FND2hqbfJmKSM3fqXm0uHCoOI2eQk3-_7SM45L86cd1AUTwkeE9E2r5fLz2NWjflYPChGpGVVSWtKz4oRxoyXWAj2qDiPcYvzEpSNil_dBtA7vw8ODuhyA2r9BnUbGxKAQx0ovYEQ0RJufEjoyt-ilPm5S5ANKRem34PTENHC5julD0i59Z_D3MUU9jpZ75DNgRuwAV2XhKJJr2IM3u_i4-KhUX2EJ3f7RfFl-rabXJWLj7P55HJRas4FK43BrGZg2IqtKlBCAVecNpysKdGmxrjCmpqVqfCaKm04rExd8VZUmguKCWcXxctj7k3wP_YQk9zZqKHvlQO_j7IRgmPciv8AmRAtbjL4_B64HTqZPyEpoYQR1tQZenEHqahVb4Jy2kZ5E-xOhYMknGLM6cDhI6eDz50BI7VNauhcCsr2kmA5jFjmEUtWSS6Hh766Zzml_g0eH-Fb28PhH-RQEsGy4dnRsI3Jh5Oh5g0WbVbLo2pjgp8nVYXvsqpZLeTXDzPZXXez99NvU_mJ_QZYfc_r
CODEN RRQUA6
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_rrq_245
crossref_primary_10_2190_EC_48_2_b
crossref_primary_10_1002_RRQ_002
crossref_primary_10_1177_16094069211025453
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1467_9620_2006_00685_x
crossref_primary_10_1080_00131725_2012_708623
crossref_primary_10_2304_elea_2007_4_4_433
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jssr_2020_03_002
crossref_primary_10_2190_EC_37_3_b
crossref_primary_10_1177_1086296X11421979
crossref_primary_10_1177_016146810610800601
crossref_primary_10_55860_BRIX7358
crossref_primary_10_26589_jockle__49_201403_221
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11125_023_09677_2
crossref_primary_10_1002_trtr_1168
crossref_primary_10_1177_0042085906289708
crossref_primary_10_1080_14926156_2012_649051
crossref_primary_10_31565_korrow_2017__32_001
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1540_5826_2009_00283_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssaho_2022_100253
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijer_2020_101696
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11145_018_9892_z
crossref_primary_10_1598_RT_63_1_4
crossref_primary_10_1002_meet_14504901202
crossref_primary_10_1080_1554480X_2011_554625
crossref_primary_10_1080_19388070509558430
crossref_primary_10_1080_2331186X_2023_2245982
crossref_primary_10_1080_02188791_2019_1671808
crossref_primary_10_1080_10573560490446330
crossref_primary_10_1080_19388070609558452
crossref_primary_10_1080_02702710902733576
crossref_primary_10_7763_IJSSH_2015_V5_546
crossref_primary_10_21733_ibad_582657
crossref_primary_10_1080_02702711_2013_808723
crossref_primary_10_1080_02702710701568488
crossref_primary_10_1080_10862960709336756
crossref_primary_10_1080_00377990903284070
crossref_primary_10_1002_asi_20416
crossref_primary_10_1598_RT_60_8_6
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0958344009990085
crossref_primary_10_1044_leader_FTR1_07112002_4
crossref_primary_10_1002_meet_2011_14504801189
crossref_primary_10_1002_asi_23117
crossref_primary_10_1177_1049732310375967
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1463423609990375
crossref_primary_10_1057_s41291_023_00226_5
crossref_primary_10_1080_21532974_2017_1305305
crossref_primary_10_1598_RT_63_4_3
crossref_primary_10_1080_1475939X_2012_659894
crossref_primary_10_5054_tj_2011_259954
crossref_primary_10_7202_007354ar
Cites_doi 10.1080/10862969709547959
10.1598/RRQ.31.4.5
10.4324/9781410603791
10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.620
10.1598/RRQ.31.4.2
10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
10.1080/105735600278088
10.1016/0742-051X(87)90015-1
10.1002/tl.37219966511
10.1598/RRQ.34.2.3
10.1080/19388079409558156
10.1080/10862969009547720
10.1525/california/9780520079557.001.0001
10.1177/002248718904000407
10.4135/9781452231471.n9
10.1177/0022487196047003007
10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
10.1016/0742-051X(91)90053-R
10.1002/tl.37219966508
10.1598/RRQ.35.1.8
10.1598/RRQ.34.4.5
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright 2001 International Reading Association
2001 International Reading Association
2002 INIST-CNRS
Copyright International Reading Association Oct-Dec 2001
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright 2001 International Reading Association
– notice: 2001 International Reading Association
– notice: 2002 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright International Reading Association Oct-Dec 2001
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
0-V
3V.
7T9
7XB
88B
88G
8A4
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8G5
ABUWG
AFKRA
AHOVV
AIMQZ
ALSLI
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
CJNVE
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
GUQSH
LIQON
M0P
M2M
M2O
M6I
MBDVC
PADUT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PKEHL
PMKZF
PQEDU
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PSYQQ
Q9U
S0X
8BM
DOI 10.1598/RRQ.36.4.5
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Education Database (Alumni)
Psychology Database (Alumni)
Education Periodicals
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Education Research Index
ProQuest One Literature
Social Science Premium Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Education Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
Research Library Prep
ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only
Education Database
Psychology Database
Research Library
KidQuest Magazines
Research Library (Corporate)
Research Library China
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Digital Collections
ProQuest One Education
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Basic
SIRS Editorial
ComDisDome
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
ProQuest One Education
ProQuest One Psychology
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
SIRS Editorial
KidQuest Magazines
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Research Library
Research Library China
ProQuest Central (New)
Social Science Premium Collection
ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only
Education Collection
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Literature
ProQuest Education Journals
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni)
ProQuest Professional Education
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Digital Collections
ProQuest Psychology Journals
ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Education Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ComDisDome
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest One Education
CrossRef
ComDisDome


Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Education
EISSN 1936-2722
EndPage 466
ExternalDocumentID 88125892
14200427
10_1598_RRQ_36_4_5
RRQ153
748059
ark_67375_WNG_TKTGMFXF_P
Genre article
GeographicLocations USA
United States--US
Virginia
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States--US
– name: Virginia
GroupedDBID -DZ
-W8
-~X
.GO
.Y3
0-V
05W
0R~
123
1OC
29P
2AX
2KS
3-9
31~
33P
3R3
3V.
50Y
50Z
52U
8-0
8-1
85S
8A4
8FI
8FJ
8G5
8R4
8R5
930
A04
AAAZS
AABNI
AAESR
AAHHS
AAHSB
AAONW
AAOUF
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYJJ
AAYOK
AAZKR
ABBHK
ABCQX
ABCUV
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABLWH
ABPPZ
ABPVW
ABSOO
ABUWG
ABXSQ
ACAHQ
ACBKW
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACKOT
ACNCT
ACPOU
ACTDY
ACXQS
ADACV
ADBBV
ADEMA
ADEOM
ADEPB
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADMHG
ADNFJ
ADUKH
ADULT
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AEQDE
AEUPB
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFKFF
AFKRA
AFPWT
AFRQD
AFZJQ
AGNAY
AHBTC
AIAGR
AIFKG
AIKWM
AIMQZ
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJPNJ
ALAGY
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALSLI
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
AQSKT
ARALO
ASPBG
ASTYK
AS~
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZQEC
AZVAB
B-7
BAFTC
BDRZF
BENPR
BFHJK
BMXJE
BNVMJ
BPHCQ
BQESF
BRXPI
BSCLL
BVXVI
CCPQU
CJNVE
CS3
DCZOG
DPXWK
DRFUL
DRSSH
DU5
DWQXO
EBS
EDJ
EJD
F5P
FEDTE
FYUFA
G-S
G50
GENNL
GNUQQ
GODZA
GUQSH
HF~
HGD
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZ~
H~9
IAO
ICO
IEA
IER
IOF
IPSME
JAAYA
JAV
JBMMH
JBZCM
JENOY
JHFFW
JKQEH
JLEZI
JLXEF
JPL
JSODD
JST
KOO
L7B
LATKE
LEEKS
LIQON
LITHE
LOXES
LUTES
LYRES
M0P
M2M
M2O
M6I
MEWTI
MRFUL
MRSSH
MSFUL
MSSSH
MVM
MXFUL
MXSSH
MY~
N04
N06
NEJ
NF~
NHB
O66
O9-
OMK
P2P
P2W
P4E
PADUT
PQEDU
PQQKQ
PRG
PROAC
PSYQQ
Q.N
Q2X
Q3B
QB0
QF4
QM7
QN7
R.K
RJX
ROL
RX1
S0X
SA0
SJN
SUPJJ
TN5
UKHRP
UKR
V8K
VQA
WBKPD
WGMDG
WH7
WIH
WII
WOHZO
WSUWO
WXSBR
XOL
XZL
YYP
ZCA
ZZTAW
~WP
AAHQN
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANHP
AAYCA
ABAWQ
ACHJO
ACRPL
ACYXJ
ADNMO
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AFWVQ
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
ALVPJ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PMKZF
3EH
68V
7K8
ABOPQ
AFYRF
ALEEW
ITC
MQT
P-O
QZG
UBC
WHG
YCJ
ZCG
AAYXX
CITATION
08R
63O
8W4
AAJUZ
AALRV
AAPBV
ABCVL
ABPTK
ABWRO
ACXME
ADDAD
AFVGU
AGJLS
AJYWA
AQNXB
BBAFP
IQODW
N95
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7T9
7XB
8FK
AAWJA
AHOVV
MBDVC
PKEHL
PUEGO
Q9U
8BM
LH4
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4453-ff0373ef3b3b6ea5ae4a42841d21cf70060c2fbf60d2acf4ebf764956c4520143
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISSN 0034-0553
IngestDate Thu Sep 04 17:31:58 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 17:07:10 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 23 14:41:26 EDT 2025
Fri Nov 25 01:09:25 EST 2022
Thu Apr 24 22:53:19 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:55:16 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:25:54 EST 2025
Thu Jul 03 21:32:46 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 30 09:53:19 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords New Information and Communication Technologies (NTIC)
Internet
Motivation
Teachers training
Literacy
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4453-ff0373ef3b3b6ea5ae4a42841d21cf70060c2fbf60d2acf4ebf764956c4520143
Notes ArticleID:RRQ153
ark:/67375/WNG-TKTGMFXF-P
istex:D1F16FA0F17F4A3B0B8EA20A87E046C38E8FAECA
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
PQID 212131387
PQPubID 577
PageCount 25
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_85540095
proquest_miscellaneous_85355908
proquest_journals_212131387
pascalfrancis_primary_14200427
crossref_citationtrail_10_1598_RRQ_36_4_5
crossref_primary_10_1598_RRQ_36_4_5
wiley_primary_10_1598_RRQ_36_4_5_RRQ153
jstor_primary_748059
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_TKTGMFXF_P
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2001-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2001-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2001
  text: 2001-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Oxford, UK
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford, UK
– name: Newark, DE
– name: Newark
PublicationTitle Reading research quarterly
PublicationYear 2001
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
International Reading Association
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: International Reading Association
References Baker, E.A. (2000). Instructional approaches used to integrate literacy and technology. Reading Online, 4. Retrieved January 1, 2000 from the World Wide Web: www.readingonline.orgarticlesbaker.
Labbo, L.D. (1996). A semiotic analysis of young children's symbol making in a classroom computer center. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 356-385.
Means, B., Blando, J., Olson, K., Middleton, T., Morocco, C.C., Remz, A.R., & Zorfass, J. (1993). Using technology to support education reform. Washington, DC: Office of Research, United States Department of Education.
Balli, S.J., Wright, M.D., & Foster, P.N. (1997). Preservice teachers' field experiences with technology. Educational Technology, 36(5), 40-46.
Reinking, D., & Rickman, S.S. (1990). The effects of computer-mediated texts on the vocabulary learning and comprehension of intermediate-grade readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 395-411.
Reinking, D., & Chanlin, L.J. (1994). Graphic aids in electronic texts. Reading Research and Instruction, 33, 207-232.
Tao, L., & Reinking, D. (1996). What research reveals about email in education (Report No. CS-012-853). Charleston, SC: Annual Meeting of the College Reading Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 408 572).
Calderhead, J., & Robson, M. (1991). Images of teaching: Student teachers' early conceptions of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 1-8.
Ivey, G. (1999). A multicase study in the middle school: Complexities among young adolescent readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 172-192.
Nicaise, M., & Barnes, D. (1996). The union of technology, constructivism, and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 205-212.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Angelo, T.A. (1996). Relating exemplary teaching to student learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 65, 57-64.
Stahl, S.A., Hynd, C.R., Britton, B.K., McNish, M.M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 430-449.
Boyarin, J. (Ed.). (1993). The ethnography of reading. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Karchmer, R.A. (2000). Understanding teachers' perspectives of Internet use in the classroom: Implications for teacher education and staff development. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16, 81-85.
Baker, E.A., & Kinzer, C.K. (1998). Effects of technology on process writing: Are they all good? In T. Shanahan & F.V. Rodriguez-Brown (Eds.), 47th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 428-440). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
Leu, D.J. Jr., Mallette, M.H., & Karchmer, R.A. (in press). New literacies, new technologies, and new realities: Redefining the agenda for literacy research. Reading Research and Instruction..
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Trathen, W., & Moorman, G. (in press). Using e-mail to create pedagogical dialogue in teacher education. Reading Research and Instruction..
Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1880-1990. New York: Teachers College Press.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-92.
Carter, K., Sabers, D., Cushing, K., Pinnegar, S., & Berliner, D. (1987). Processing and using information about students: A study of expert, novice and postulant teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 147-157.
Clark, R.E. (1991). When researchers swim upstream: Reflections on an unpopular argument about learning from media. Educational Technology, 31, 34-40.
Bolter, J.D. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Livingston, C., & Borko, H. (1989). Expert-novice differences in teaching: A cognitive analysis and implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 36-42.
Labbo, L.D., & Reinking, D. (1999). Negotiating the multiple realities of technology in literacy research and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 478-492.
Wood, J.M. (1999). Early literacy instruction and educational technologies: Three classroom-based models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA.
Drucker, P.F. (1994, November). The age of social transformation. Atlantic Monthly, pp. 53-80.
Oppenheimer, T. (1997, July). The computer delusion. The Atlantic Monthly. Retrieved January 15, 1999 from the World Wide Web: www.theatlantic.comissues97julcomputer.html.
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
El-Hindi, A.E. (1998). Beyond classroom boundaries: Constructivist teaching with the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 51, 694-700.
Leu, D.J., Karchmer, R.A., & Leu, D.D. (1999). The Miss Rumphius effect: Envisionments for literacy and learning that transform the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 52, 636-642.
Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Guterman, E. (1989). The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a reading partner. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 620-627.
Leu, D.J., Jr., & Kinzer, C.K. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction with networked technologies for information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 108-127.
Becker, H.J. (1991). When powerful tools meet conventional beliefs and institutional constraints. The Computing Teacher, 18(8), 6-9.
Bruce, B.C. (1997b). Literacy technologies: What stance should we take? Journal of Literacy Research, 29, 289-309.
Perkins, D.N. (1991). Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage? Educational Technology, 5, 18-23.
McKeon, C.A. (in press). E-mail as a motivating literacy event for one struggling reader: Donna's case. Reading Research and Instruction..
Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Chase, S.E. (1995). Ambiguous empowerment. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.
Lowman, J. (1996). Characteristics of exemplary teachers. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 65, 33-40.
Diringer, D. (1968). The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.
Manguel, A. (1996). A history of reading. New York: Viking.
1989; 40
1991; 18
1987; 3
2000; 4
1996, July
2000; 3
1991; 31
1989; 81
1998
1997
1996
1997, July
1995
1994
1994, November
1999a
1993
1997a
1991
1999b
1991; 7
1996; 31
1993, April
1999
1991; 5
2000, December
1990; 22
2000; 16
2000
2000; 35
1997; 36
1986
1999; 34
1994; 33
1997b; 29
1985
2000b
2000a
1983
1999; 52
1996; 47
1998; 51
1996; 65
1968
1967
1996; 66
Labbo L.D. (e_1_2_1_34_1) 1998
El‐Hindi A.E. (e_1_2_1_26_1) 1998; 51
e_1_2_1_60_1
Bolter J.D. (e_1_2_1_11_1) 1998
Bogdan R.C. (e_1_2_1_9_1) 1998
Reinking D. (e_1_2_1_62_1) 1997
Tao L. (e_1_2_1_68_1) 1996
e_1_2_1_43_1
e_1_2_1_64_1
e_1_2_1_49_1
Balli S.J. (e_1_2_1_7_1) 1997; 36
Clark R.E. (e_1_2_1_20_1) 1991; 31
Oppenheimer T. (e_1_2_1_57_1) 1997
Kamil M.L. (e_1_2_1_30_1) 2000
Leu D.J. (e_1_2_1_37_1) 1999; 52
Glaser B. (e_1_2_1_27_1) 1967
e_1_2_1_71_1
e_1_2_1_54_1
Wood J.M. (e_1_2_1_72_1) 1999
Leu D.J. (e_1_2_1_39_1)
McKeon C.A. (e_1_2_1_46_1)
e_1_2_1_56_1
e_1_2_1_12_1
e_1_2_1_35_1
e_1_2_1_50_1
e_1_2_1_4_1
e_1_2_1_33_1
e_1_2_1_52_1
e_1_2_1_2_1
Lincoln Y.S. (e_1_2_1_41_1) 1997
e_1_2_1_16_1
e_1_2_1_14_1
Perkins D.N. (e_1_2_1_58_1) 1991; 5
Kaplan N. (e_1_2_1_31_1) 1991
Leu D.J. (e_1_2_1_36_1) 2000
Anderson‐Inman L. (e_1_2_1_3_1) 1998
Trathen W. (e_1_2_1_69_1)
Manguel A. (e_1_2_1_45_1) 1996
Cuban L. (e_1_2_1_23_1) 1993
Leu D.J. (e_1_2_1_40_1) 1996
Mikulecky L. (e_1_2_1_48_1) 1998
Baker E.A. (e_1_2_1_5_1) 2000; 4
e_1_2_1_42_1
e_1_2_1_65_1
e_1_2_1_67_1
Diringer D. (e_1_2_1_24_1) 1968
e_1_2_1_61_1
Becker H.J. (e_1_2_1_8_1) 1991; 18
e_1_2_1_21_1
e_1_2_1_44_1
e_1_2_1_63_1
Hodder I. (e_1_2_1_28_1) 1994
e_1_2_1_29_1
Bruce B.C. (e_1_2_1_13_1) 1997
Schön D.A. (e_1_2_1_66_1) 1983
Reinking D. (e_1_2_1_59_1) 1995
e_1_2_1_70_1
Means B. (e_1_2_1_47_1) 1993
Cuban L. (e_1_2_1_22_1) 1986
Clandinin D.J. (e_1_2_1_19_1) 1994
Drucker P.F. (e_1_2_1_25_1) 1994
e_1_2_1_55_1
e_1_2_1_51_1
e_1_2_1_32_1
e_1_2_1_53_1
Bolter J.D. (e_1_2_1_10_1) 1991
Baker E.A. (e_1_2_1_6_1) 1998
e_1_2_1_17_1
e_1_2_1_38_1
Chase S.E. (e_1_2_1_18_1) 1995
e_1_2_1_15_1
References_xml – reference: Baker, E.A. (2000). Instructional approaches used to integrate literacy and technology. Reading Online, 4. Retrieved January 1, 2000 from the World Wide Web: www.readingonline.orgarticlesbaker.
– reference: McKeon, C.A. (in press). E-mail as a motivating literacy event for one struggling reader: Donna's case. Reading Research and Instruction..
– reference: Diringer, D. (1968). The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.
– reference: El-Hindi, A.E. (1998). Beyond classroom boundaries: Constructivist teaching with the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 51, 694-700.
– reference: Leu, D.J., Jr., & Kinzer, C.K. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction with networked technologies for information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 108-127.
– reference: Manguel, A. (1996). A history of reading. New York: Viking.
– reference: Angelo, T.A. (1996). Relating exemplary teaching to student learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 65, 57-64.
– reference: Clark, R.E. (1991). When researchers swim upstream: Reflections on an unpopular argument about learning from media. Educational Technology, 31, 34-40.
– reference: Labbo, L.D. (1996). A semiotic analysis of young children's symbol making in a classroom computer center. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 356-385.
– reference: Boyarin, J. (Ed.). (1993). The ethnography of reading. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
– reference: Chase, S.E. (1995). Ambiguous empowerment. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.
– reference: Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
– reference: Leu, D.J., Karchmer, R.A., & Leu, D.D. (1999). The Miss Rumphius effect: Envisionments for literacy and learning that transform the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 52, 636-642.
– reference: Baker, E.A., & Kinzer, C.K. (1998). Effects of technology on process writing: Are they all good? In T. Shanahan & F.V. Rodriguez-Brown (Eds.), 47th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 428-440). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
– reference: New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-92.
– reference: Reinking, D., & Chanlin, L.J. (1994). Graphic aids in electronic texts. Reading Research and Instruction, 33, 207-232.
– reference: Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
– reference: Leu, D.J. Jr., Mallette, M.H., & Karchmer, R.A. (in press). New literacies, new technologies, and new realities: Redefining the agenda for literacy research. Reading Research and Instruction..
– reference: Drucker, P.F. (1994, November). The age of social transformation. Atlantic Monthly, pp. 53-80.
– reference: Reinking, D., & Rickman, S.S. (1990). The effects of computer-mediated texts on the vocabulary learning and comprehension of intermediate-grade readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 395-411.
– reference: Wood, J.M. (1999). Early literacy instruction and educational technologies: Three classroom-based models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA.
– reference: Karchmer, R.A. (2000). Understanding teachers' perspectives of Internet use in the classroom: Implications for teacher education and staff development. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16, 81-85.
– reference: Ivey, G. (1999). A multicase study in the middle school: Complexities among young adolescent readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 172-192.
– reference: Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
– reference: Livingston, C., & Borko, H. (1989). Expert-novice differences in teaching: A cognitive analysis and implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 36-42.
– reference: Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Guterman, E. (1989). The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a reading partner. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 620-627.
– reference: Labbo, L.D., & Reinking, D. (1999). Negotiating the multiple realities of technology in literacy research and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 478-492.
– reference: Nicaise, M., & Barnes, D. (1996). The union of technology, constructivism, and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 205-212.
– reference: Oppenheimer, T. (1997, July). The computer delusion. The Atlantic Monthly. Retrieved January 15, 1999 from the World Wide Web: www.theatlantic.comissues97julcomputer.html.
– reference: Trathen, W., & Moorman, G. (in press). Using e-mail to create pedagogical dialogue in teacher education. Reading Research and Instruction..
– reference: Glaser, B., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
– reference: Means, B., Blando, J., Olson, K., Middleton, T., Morocco, C.C., Remz, A.R., & Zorfass, J. (1993). Using technology to support education reform. Washington, DC: Office of Research, United States Department of Education.
– reference: Becker, H.J. (1991). When powerful tools meet conventional beliefs and institutional constraints. The Computing Teacher, 18(8), 6-9.
– reference: Perkins, D.N. (1991). Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage? Educational Technology, 5, 18-23.
– reference: Bruce, B.C. (1997b). Literacy technologies: What stance should we take? Journal of Literacy Research, 29, 289-309.
– reference: Calderhead, J., & Robson, M. (1991). Images of teaching: Student teachers' early conceptions of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 1-8.
– reference: Carter, K., Sabers, D., Cushing, K., Pinnegar, S., & Berliner, D. (1987). Processing and using information about students: A study of expert, novice and postulant teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 147-157.
– reference: Lowman, J. (1996). Characteristics of exemplary teachers. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 65, 33-40.
– reference: Balli, S.J., Wright, M.D., & Foster, P.N. (1997). Preservice teachers' field experiences with technology. Educational Technology, 36(5), 40-46.
– reference: Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1880-1990. New York: Teachers College Press.
– reference: Bolter, J.D. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
– reference: Stahl, S.A., Hynd, C.R., Britton, B.K., McNish, M.M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 430-449.
– reference: Tao, L., & Reinking, D. (1996). What research reveals about email in education (Report No. CS-012-853). Charleston, SC: Annual Meeting of the College Reading Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 408 572).
– reference: Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
– year: 1985
– year: 1999a
– volume: 65
  start-page: 57
  year: 1996
  end-page: 64
  article-title: Relating exemplary teaching to student learning
  publication-title: New Directions for Teaching and Learning
– volume: 5
  start-page: 18
  year: 1991
  end-page: 23
  article-title: Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage?
  publication-title: Educational Technology
– volume: 18
  start-page: 6
  issue: 8
  year: 1991
  end-page: 9
  article-title: When powerful tools meet conventional beliefs and institutional constraints
  publication-title: The Computing Teacher
– volume: 3
  start-page: 147
  year: 1987
  end-page: 157
  article-title: Processing and using information about students: A study of expert, novice and postulant teachers
  publication-title: Teaching and Teacher Education
– start-page: 179
  year: 1999
  end-page: 202
– start-page: 11
  year: 1991
  end-page: 42
– volume: 51
  start-page: 694
  year: 1998
  end-page: 700
  article-title: Beyond classroom boundaries: Constructivist teaching with the Internet
  publication-title: The Reading Teacher
– start-page: 3
  year: 1998
  end-page: 13
– article-title: New literacies, new technologies, and new realities: Redefining the agenda for literacy research
  publication-title: Reading Research and Instruction.
– volume: 4
  year: 2000
  article-title: Instructional approaches used to integrate literacy and technology
  publication-title: Reading Online
– year: 2000b
– year: 1998
– volume: 35
  start-page: 108
  year: 2000
  end-page: 127
  article-title: The convergence of literacy instruction with networked technologies for information and communication
  publication-title: Reading Research Quarterly
– year: 1986
– article-title: Using e‐mail to create pedagogical dialogue in teacher education
  publication-title: Reading Research and Instruction.
– volume: 3
  start-page: 771
  year: 2000
  end-page: 788
– start-page: 875
  year: 1997a
  end-page: 884
– start-page: 79
  year: 1998
  end-page: 91
– year: 1997, July
  article-title: The computer delusion
  publication-title: The Atlantic Monthly.
– year: 1996, July
– volume: 29
  start-page: 289
  year: 1997b
  end-page: 309
  article-title: Literacy technologies: What stance should we take?
  publication-title: Journal of Literacy Research
– volume: 31
  start-page: 34
  year: 1991
  end-page: 40
  article-title: When researchers swim upstream: Reflections on an unpopular argument about learning from media
  publication-title: Educational Technology
– start-page: 53
  year: 1994, November
  end-page: 80
  article-title: The age of social transformation
  publication-title: Atlantic Monthly
– start-page: 54
  year: 1997
  end-page: 68
– year: 1997
– year: 2000, December
– volume: 36
  start-page: 40
  issue: 5
  year: 1997
  end-page: 46
  article-title: Preservice teachers' field experiences with technology
  publication-title: Educational Technology
– year: 1993
– year: 1993, April
– article-title: E‐mail as a motivating literacy event for one struggling reader: Donna's case
  publication-title: Reading Research and Instruction.
– year: 1983
– volume: 34
  start-page: 172
  year: 1999
  end-page: 192
  article-title: A multicase study in the middle school: Complexities among young adolescent readers
  publication-title: Reading Research Quarterly
– start-page: 428
  year: 1998
  end-page: 440
– volume: 47
  start-page: 205
  year: 1996
  end-page: 212
  article-title: The union of technology, constructivism, and teacher education
  publication-title: Journal of Teacher Education
– year: 1968
– start-page: 43
  year: 1996
  end-page: 76
– year: 1996
– volume: 66
  start-page: 60
  year: 1996
  end-page: 92
  article-title: A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures
  publication-title: Harvard Educational Review
– year: 2000
– start-page: 17
  year: 1995
  end-page: 33
– volume: 31
  start-page: 430
  year: 1996
  end-page: 449
  article-title: What happens when students read multiple source documents in history?
  publication-title: Reading Research Quarterly
– start-page: 15
  year: 1998
  end-page: 43
– year: 1999b
– start-page: 77
  year: 1997
  end-page: 92
– volume: 22
  start-page: 395
  year: 1990
  end-page: 411
  article-title: The effects of computer‐mediated texts on the vocabulary learning and comprehension of intermediate‐grade readers
  publication-title: Journal of Reading Behavior
– start-page: 303
  year: 1998
  end-page: 320
– year: 1967
– volume: 7
  start-page: 1
  year: 1991
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Images of teaching: Student teachers' early conceptions of classroom practice
  publication-title: Teaching and Teacher Education
– volume: 81
  start-page: 620
  year: 1989
  end-page: 627
  article-title: The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading‐related metacognitions from a reading partner
  publication-title: Journal of Educational Psychology
– start-page: xi
  year: 1998
  end-page: xxx
– year: 1995
– volume: 31
  start-page: 356
  year: 1996
  end-page: 385
  article-title: A semiotic analysis of young children's symbol making in a classroom computer center
  publication-title: Reading Research Quarterly
– volume: 16
  start-page: 81
  year: 2000
  end-page: 85
  article-title: Understanding teachers' perspectives of Internet use in the classroom: Implications for teacher education and staff development
  publication-title: Reading and Writing Quarterly
– volume: 65
  start-page: 33
  year: 1996
  end-page: 40
  article-title: Characteristics of exemplary teachers
  publication-title: New Directions for Teaching and Learning
– volume: 33
  start-page: 207
  year: 1994
  end-page: 232
  article-title: Graphic aids in electronic texts
  publication-title: Reading Research and Instruction
– year: 1991
– volume: 40
  start-page: 36
  year: 1989
  end-page: 42
  article-title: Expert‐novice differences in teaching: A cognitive analysis and implications for teacher education
  publication-title: Journal of Teacher Education
– start-page: 393
  year: 1994
  end-page: 412
– year: 2000a
– year: 1999
– start-page: 413
  year: 1994
  end-page: 427
– volume: 34
  start-page: 478
  year: 1999
  end-page: 492
  article-title: Negotiating the multiple realities of technology in literacy research and instruction
  publication-title: Reading Research Quarterly
– volume: 3
  start-page: 743
  year: 2000
  end-page: 770
– volume: 52
  start-page: 636
  year: 1999
  end-page: 642
  article-title: The Miss Rumphius effect: Envisionments for literacy and learning that transform the Internet
  publication-title: The Reading Teacher
– start-page: 3
  volume-title: Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post‐typographic world
  year: 1998
  ident: e_1_2_1_11_1
– volume-title: Using technology to support education reform.
  year: 1993
  ident: e_1_2_1_47_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_14_1
  doi: 10.1080/10862969709547959
– ident: e_1_2_1_21_1
– volume-title: The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.
  year: 1967
  ident: e_1_2_1_27_1
– start-page: 17
  volume-title: Perspectives on literacy research and practice: 44th yearbook of the National Reading Conference
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_1_59_1
– volume-title: Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920.
  year: 1986
  ident: e_1_2_1_22_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_67_1
  doi: 10.1598/RRQ.31.4.5
– ident: e_1_2_1_51_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_69_1
  article-title: Using e‐mail to create pedagogical dialogue in teacher education
  publication-title: Reading Research and Instruction.
– start-page: 54
  volume-title: Inquiries in literacy theory and practice: 46th yearbook of the National Reading Conference
  year: 1997
  ident: e_1_2_1_41_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_60_1
  doi: 10.4324/9781410603791
– ident: e_1_2_1_65_1
  doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.620
– ident: e_1_2_1_33_1
  doi: 10.1598/RRQ.31.4.2
– ident: e_1_2_1_42_1
  doi: 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
– start-page: 15
  volume-title: Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post‐typographic world
  year: 1998
  ident: e_1_2_1_3_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_32_1
  doi: 10.1080/105735600278088
– start-page: 77
  volume-title: Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts
  year: 1997
  ident: e_1_2_1_62_1
– volume: 4
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_1_5_1
  article-title: Instructional approaches used to integrate literacy and technology
  publication-title: Reading Online
– ident: e_1_2_1_16_1
  doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(87)90015-1
– start-page: 771
  volume-title: Handbook of reading research
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_1_30_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_53_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_50_1
– start-page: 43
  volume-title: Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_1_40_1
– volume-title: Ambiguous empowerment.
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_1_18_1
– start-page: 393
  volume-title: Handbook of qualitative research
  year: 1994
  ident: e_1_2_1_28_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_64_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_2_1
– volume: 5
  start-page: 18
  year: 1991
  ident: e_1_2_1_58_1
  article-title: Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage?
  publication-title: Educational Technology
– ident: e_1_2_1_4_1
  doi: 10.1002/tl.37219966511
– start-page: 413
  volume-title: Handbook of qualitative research
  year: 1994
  ident: e_1_2_1_19_1
– volume-title: What research reveals about email in education
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_1_68_1
– volume-title: A history of reading.
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_1_45_1
– volume-title: Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing.
  year: 1991
  ident: e_1_2_1_10_1
– start-page: 53
  year: 1994
  ident: e_1_2_1_25_1
  article-title: The age of social transformation
  publication-title: Atlantic Monthly
– ident: e_1_2_1_29_1
  doi: 10.1598/RRQ.34.2.3
– ident: e_1_2_1_61_1
  doi: 10.1080/19388079409558156
– ident: e_1_2_1_63_1
  doi: 10.1080/10862969009547720
– start-page: 428
  volume-title: Effects of technology on process writing: Are they all good?
  year: 1998
  ident: e_1_2_1_6_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_71_1
– start-page: 743
  volume-title: Handbook of reading research
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_1_36_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_12_1
  doi: 10.1525/california/9780520079557.001.0001
– volume-title: How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1880–1990.
  year: 1993
  ident: e_1_2_1_23_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_43_1
  doi: 10.1177/002248718904000407
– volume-title: Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods.
  year: 1998
  ident: e_1_2_1_9_1
– start-page: 875
  volume-title: Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts
  year: 1997
  ident: e_1_2_1_13_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_49_1
  doi: 10.4135/9781452231471.n9
– ident: e_1_2_1_56_1
  doi: 10.1177/0022487196047003007
– ident: e_1_2_1_55_1
  doi: 10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
– volume: 18
  start-page: 6
  issue: 8
  year: 1991
  ident: e_1_2_1_8_1
  article-title: When powerful tools meet conventional beliefs and institutional constraints
  publication-title: The Computing Teacher
– volume: 52
  start-page: 636
  year: 1999
  ident: e_1_2_1_37_1
  article-title: The Miss Rumphius effect: Envisionments for literacy and learning that transform the Internet
  publication-title: The Reading Teacher
– ident: e_1_2_1_39_1
  article-title: New literacies, new technologies, and new realities: Redefining the agenda for literacy research
  publication-title: Reading Research and Instruction.
– ident: e_1_2_1_15_1
  doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(91)90053-R
– ident: e_1_2_1_54_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_70_1
– start-page: 79
  volume-title: Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post‐typographic world
  year: 1998
  ident: e_1_2_1_34_1
– start-page: 303
  volume-title: Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post‐typographic world
  year: 1998
  ident: e_1_2_1_48_1
– volume-title: The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind.
  year: 1968
  ident: e_1_2_1_24_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_17_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_44_1
  doi: 10.1002/tl.37219966508
– ident: e_1_2_1_46_1
  article-title: E‐mail as a motivating literacy event for one struggling reader: Donna's case
  publication-title: Reading Research and Instruction.
– ident: e_1_2_1_38_1
  doi: 10.1598/RRQ.35.1.8
– volume-title: The reflective practitioner.
  year: 1983
  ident: e_1_2_1_66_1
– year: 1997
  ident: e_1_2_1_57_1
  article-title: The computer delusion
  publication-title: The Atlantic Monthly.
– volume: 31
  start-page: 34
  year: 1991
  ident: e_1_2_1_20_1
  article-title: When researchers swim upstream: Reflections on an unpopular argument about learning from media
  publication-title: Educational Technology
– ident: e_1_2_1_35_1
  doi: 10.1598/RRQ.34.4.5
– volume-title: Early literacy instruction and educational technologies: Three classroom‐based models.
  year: 1999
  ident: e_1_2_1_72_1
– volume: 51
  start-page: 694
  year: 1998
  ident: e_1_2_1_26_1
  article-title: Beyond classroom boundaries: Constructivist teaching with the Internet
  publication-title: The Reading Teacher
– start-page: 11
  volume-title: Evolving perspectives on computers and composition studies
  year: 1991
  ident: e_1_2_1_31_1
– volume: 36
  start-page: 40
  issue: 5
  year: 1997
  ident: e_1_2_1_7_1
  article-title: Preservice teachers' field experiences with technology
  publication-title: Educational Technology
– ident: e_1_2_1_52_1
SSID ssj0000523
Score 1.9127604
Snippet The purpose of this study was to explore 13 K-12 teachers' reports of how the Internet influenced literacy and literacy instruction in their classrooms. The...
ABSTRACTS The purpose of this study was to explore 13 K‐12 teachers' reports of how the Internet influenced literacy and literacy instruction in their...
The purpose of this study was to explore 13 K‐12 teachers' reports of how the Internet influenced literacy and literacy instruction in their classrooms. The...
The purpose of this study was to explore 13 K-12 teachers' reports of how the Internet influenced literacy & literacy instruction in their classrooms. The...
SourceID proquest
pascalfrancis
crossref
wiley
jstor
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 442
SubjectTerms adult
Adult Literacy
analysis
Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods
digital
Educational sciences
Educational Technology
Elementary Education
ICT
Influence
information
instructional
Internet
learner
Literacy
Literacy Education
media
methodology
Motivation
Preservice Teacher Education
Preservice Teachers
profdev
Reading instruction
Reading Materials
Reading research
Reading, writing
reflection
Secondary Education
strategies
supplementary
survey
Teacher Attitudes
Teacher education
Teachers
Teaching methods
Technology
topic
type
United States of America
Web pages
Writing instruction
Title The Journey Ahead: Thirteen Teachers Report How the Internet Influences Literacy and Literacy Instruction in Their K-12 Classrooms
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-TKTGMFXF-P/fulltext.pdf
https://www.jstor.org/stable/748059
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1598%2FRRQ.36.4.5
https://www.proquest.com/docview/212131387
https://www.proquest.com/docview/85355908
https://www.proquest.com/docview/85540095
Volume 36
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3Pb9MwFLZgvXBBg4EIg2EJBOKQLvGPxOUyAVo3Ma0aVSd6s2zH1iqmdCxFwJW_fM-Ok1IJ9RIl8lN--D3bn-2X70PojWW8dEzolGg4sJK6VOW5SYuRtc4AfuWBSPt8Upxesi9zPo-5OU1Mq-z6xNBRV0vj18gPiecey6koj25-pF40ym-uRgWN-2gAxQLCfPDpeHIxXXfFnETWXZZmnNPIT8pH4nA6_TqkxZAN-caINPCV-7tLTvSZkqqBynKtysUGDP0XzIbRaLyLHkYYiT-2fn-E7tn6sVdgjtkae-gv-B-HQLF_sIIet_qAZ1eL2xXMW_GqpXFucLtjgK-WvzAAQdwuD9oVXnTSJQ1u_1E2cJO6Wl8s1sSzcI7DdgM-S3OCTQfHmyfocnw8-3yaRr2F1DDGaepcRktqHdVUF1ZxZZmC2QnLK5IbV3rqFkOcdkVWEWUcs9qVhZ9gGcaJ5wl8inbqZW2fISwyR5RgrhIjsMsqzbgqgrqMIUwTkaD3XZ1LE8nIvSbGtfSTEvCPBP9IWkgmeYJe97Y3LQXHf63eBtf1Jur2u09aK7n8NjmRs7PZyfl4PpYXCdoLvu0NSyYAYyboYMPV60cxEgRJErTf-V7Gdt7IPioT9KovhQbqd11UbZc_Gwl4iHth-W0WAJsB6iboXQipLV_pT2GMer71XfbRg5ApF1IOX6AdiAf7EqDTSh_EBnIHAG0Y1g
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1db9MwFL0a7QO8IGAgwmCzxJd4SNc4dpIiIcTHuo6u1ag60TfjOLZWgdKxFI298n_4j1w7H6US6tteqlS9StOe65vj-PocgGea8diwJPVpii8sDo0vg0D5UU9ro5C_ciekPRpHg1P2acZnW_Cn3gtj2yrrmugKdbZQ9hn5PrXaY0GYxG_Pf_jWNMourtYOGmVWDPXVJc7YijdHHxHe55T2D6YfBn5lKuArxnjoG9MN41CbMA3TSEsuNZNIwVmQ0UCZ2OqTKGpSE3UzKpVhOjVxZGcRinFqxfDwvDegzeyG1ha03x-MTyar0s9ppfLL_C7nYaWHynvJ_mTyuRNGHdbha3fAtgXzV90MaTszZYHgmNJVY432_kue3d2vfwduV7SVvCvz7C5s6fyedXyuukO24TfmG3GJqa-IxAqfvSbTs_nFEufJZFnKRhekXKEgZ4tLgsSTlI8j9ZLMa6uUgpR7ohWeJM9Wb-YroVs8Jm55gwz9gBJV0__iPpxeCxQPoJUvcv0QSNI1VCbMZEkP47pZyriMnJuNoiyliQev6v9cqEr83HpwfBd2EoT4CMRHhJFggnvwtIk9LyU__hv1wkHXhMiLb7ZJLubiy_hQTIfTw1F_1hcnHmw7bJvAmCXIaT3YXYN69VWMOgMUD3Zq7EVVVwrRjAIP9ppPsSDYVR6Z68XPQiD_4tbIflME0nSk1h68dCm14VfaQ7wnPtp4LXtwczAdHYvjo_FwB265Lj3X7vgYWpgb-gnStmW6Ww0WAl-ve3z-BeUYVZc
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Nb9NAEB2VREJcEFAQptCuxJc4OInXu7aDhBDQpi2hUYhSkduyXu-qEcgpdVDplX_Fv2N2_REiodx6iRxl5Dh5szNvvON5AM8047FhSerTFF9YHBpfBoHyo77WRiF_5W6Q9skoOjplH2d8tgV_6mdhbFtlHRNdoM4Wyt4j71I7eywIk7hrqq6I8f7g7fkP3wpI2Y3WWk2j9JChvrrE6q14c7yPUD-ndHAw_XDkVwIDvmKMh74xvTAOtQnTMI205FIziXScBRkNlIntrBJFTWqiXkalMkynJo5sRaEYp3YwHp73BrRjTIqsBe33B6PxZJUGOK0m_jK_x3lYzUbl_aQ7mXzuhFGHdfhaNmxbYH_VjZG2S1MWCJQpFTbWKPC_RNplwsEduF1RWPKu9Lm7sKXze1b9ueoU2Ybf6HvEOam-IhKjffaaTM_mF0usmcmyHCFdkHK3gpwtLgmSUFLemtRLMq9lUwpSPh-t8CR5tnozXw29xWPitjrI0A8oUXUpUNyH02uB4gG08kWuHwJJeobKhJks6aNdL0sZl5FTtlGUpTTx4FX9nwtVDUK3ehzfhS2IEB-B-IgwEkxwD542tufl-I__Wr1w0DUm8uKbbZiLufgyOhTT4fTwZDAbiLEH2w7bxjBmCfJbD3bXoF59FaNODMWDnRp7UcWYQjQrwoO95lMMDnbHR-Z68bMQyMW4FbXfZIGUHWm2By-dS234lfYQ8-OjjdeyBzdxXYpPx6PhDtxyDXuu8_ExtNA19BNkcMt0t1orBL5e9_L8C6oOWcM
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Journey+Ahead%3A+Thirteen+Teachers+Report+How+the+Internet+Influences+Literacy+and+Literacy+Instruction+in+Their+K-12+Classrooms&rft.jtitle=Reading+research+quarterly&rft.au=Karchmer%2C+Rachel+A.&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.pub=International+Reading+Association&rft.issn=0034-0553&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=442&rft.epage=466&rft_id=info:doi/10.1598%2FRRQ.36.4.5&rft.externalDocID=748059
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0034-0553&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0034-0553&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0034-0553&client=summon