Actigraphic measurement of agitated behaviour in dementia

Objectives This study examines the correlation between actigraphic measures and a validated assessment scale of agitated behaviour in dementia, the Cohen‐Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI). Methods A total of 110 patients were included. Patients either suffered from Alzheimer dementia (AD), mixed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. 388 - 393
Main Authors Nagels, Guy, Engelborghs, Sebastiaan, Vloeberghs, Ellen, Van Dam, Debby, Pickut, Barbara A., De Deyn, Peter Paul
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.04.2006
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives This study examines the correlation between actigraphic measures and a validated assessment scale of agitated behaviour in dementia, the Cohen‐Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI). Methods A total of 110 patients were included. Patients either suffered from Alzheimer dementia (AD), mixed dementia (MXD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD) or diffuse Lewy body disease (DLB). All patients underwent actigraphic recordings for 48 h. CMAI was scored by professional caretakers, who were responsible for the patient during his or her actigraphic recording. Results Patients with high total CMAI scores (≥ 50) clearly had higher levels of activity during the day as measured by means of actigraphy than patients with low total CMAI scores (ANOVA, F = 126.75, p < 0.0001). Patients with low MMSE scores (< 20) also had higher activity levels during the day than patients with higher MMSE scores (ANOVA, F = 85.74, p < 0.0001). Correlations between actigraphic data and CMAI total scores were moderate but highly significant. Conclusion We conclude that actigraphy is a useful tool to examine agitated behaviour in dementia. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-FB9TJ2TB-R
University of Antwerp
ArticleID:GPS1483
Guy Nagels and Sebastiaan Engelborghs contributed equally to this paper.
Institute Born-Bunge
istex:50ABE903B95BD36381DF4353E8751994AA7BC502
Neurosearch Antwerp
Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek MS vzw (WOMS)
Belgian Charcot Foundation
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0885-6230
1099-1166
DOI:10.1002/gps.1483