A natural approach to combating antibiotic-resistant pathogens in livestock: Hibiscus sabdariffa-derived hibiscus acid as a promising solution
We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing (STEC) and Typhimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibis...
Saved in:
Published in | Veterinární medicína Vol. 69; no. 6; pp. 207 - 216 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Czech Republic
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS)
01.06.2024
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0375-8427 1805-9392 |
DOI | 10.17221/105/2023-VETMED |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing
(STEC) and
Typhimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against STEC and
. Fifteen sets of six mice in each set were utilised: six groups were orally exposed to 4 log
colony forming units (CFUs) of
Typhimurium and another six to STEC, and three acted as the controls. Six hours post-inoculation, specific groups of mice received either oral solutions containing hibiscus acid at 5 and 7 mg/ml; streptomycin at 50 and 450 μg/ml; hibiscus acid/streptomycin (5 mg/ml hibiscus acid and 50 μg/ml streptomycin); or isotonic saline. The study determined the MIC and MBC of 7 mg/ml of hibiscus acid; 300 and 450 μg/ml of streptomycin; and two concentrations of hibiscus/streptomycin (3 mg/ml / 20 μg/ml and 5 mg/ml / 50 μg/ml). Interestingly, the mice that were infected and subsequently treated with hibiscus acid at 7 mg/ml alone or in conjunction with streptomycin did not have either STEC or
in their faecal samples, and none of the mice died. In contrast, the untreated mice and those exclusively treated with streptomycin had the pathogens present in their stool, leading to the mortality of all the subjects. |
---|---|
AbstractList | We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing
(STEC) and
Typhimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against STEC and
. Fifteen sets of six mice in each set were utilised: six groups were orally exposed to 4 log
colony forming units (CFUs) of
Typhimurium and another six to STEC, and three acted as the controls. Six hours post-inoculation, specific groups of mice received either oral solutions containing hibiscus acid at 5 and 7 mg/ml; streptomycin at 50 and 450 μg/ml; hibiscus acid/streptomycin (5 mg/ml hibiscus acid and 50 μg/ml streptomycin); or isotonic saline. The study determined the MIC and MBC of 7 mg/ml of hibiscus acid; 300 and 450 μg/ml of streptomycin; and two concentrations of hibiscus/streptomycin (3 mg/ml / 20 μg/ml and 5 mg/ml / 50 μg/ml). Interestingly, the mice that were infected and subsequently treated with hibiscus acid at 7 mg/ml alone or in conjunction with streptomycin did not have either STEC or
in their faecal samples, and none of the mice died. In contrast, the untreated mice and those exclusively treated with streptomycin had the pathogens present in their stool, leading to the mortality of all the subjects. We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Salmonella Typhimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against STEC and Salmonella. Fifteen sets of six mice in each set were utilised: six groups were orally exposed to 4 log10 colony forming units (CFUs) of S. Typhimurium and another six to STEC, and three acted as the controls. Six hours post-inoculation, specific groups of mice received either oral solutions containing hibiscus acid at 5 and 7 mg/ml; streptomycin at 50 and 450 μg/ml; hibiscus acid/streptomycin (5 mg/ml hibiscus acid and 50 μg/ml streptomycin); or isotonic saline. The study determined the MIC and MBC of 7 mg/ml of hibiscus acid; 300 and 450 μg/ml of streptomycin; and two concentrations of hibiscus/streptomycin (3 mg/ml / 20 μg/ml and 5 mg/ml / 50 μg/ml). Interestingly, the mice that were infected and subsequently treated with hibiscus acid at 7 mg/ml alone or in conjunction with streptomycin did not have either STEC or Salmonella in their faecal samples, and none of the mice died. In contrast, the untreated mice and those exclusively treated with streptomycin had the pathogens present in their stool, leading to the mortality of all the subjects.We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Salmonella Typhimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against STEC and Salmonella. Fifteen sets of six mice in each set were utilised: six groups were orally exposed to 4 log10 colony forming units (CFUs) of S. Typhimurium and another six to STEC, and three acted as the controls. Six hours post-inoculation, specific groups of mice received either oral solutions containing hibiscus acid at 5 and 7 mg/ml; streptomycin at 50 and 450 μg/ml; hibiscus acid/streptomycin (5 mg/ml hibiscus acid and 50 μg/ml streptomycin); or isotonic saline. The study determined the MIC and MBC of 7 mg/ml of hibiscus acid; 300 and 450 μg/ml of streptomycin; and two concentrations of hibiscus/streptomycin (3 mg/ml / 20 μg/ml and 5 mg/ml / 50 μg/ml). Interestingly, the mice that were infected and subsequently treated with hibiscus acid at 7 mg/ml alone or in conjunction with streptomycin did not have either STEC or Salmonella in their faecal samples, and none of the mice died. In contrast, the untreated mice and those exclusively treated with streptomycin had the pathogens present in their stool, leading to the mortality of all the subjects. We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and SalmonellaTyphimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against STEC and Salmonella. Fifteen sets of six mice in each set were utilised: six groups were orally exposed to 4 log10 colony forming units (CFUs) of S.Typhimurium and another six to STEC, and three acted as the controls. Six hours post-inoculation, specific groups of mice received either oral solutions containing hibiscus acid at 5 and 7 mg/ml; streptomycin at 50 and 450 µg/ml; hibiscus acid/streptomycin (5 mg/ml hibiscus acid and 50 µg/ml streptomycin); or isotonic saline. The study determined the MIC and MBC of 7 mg/ml of hibiscus acid; 300 and 450 µg/ml of streptomycin; and two concentrations of hibiscus/streptomycin (3 mg/ml / 20 µg/ml and 5 mg/ml / 50 µg/ml). Interestingly, the mice that were infected and subsequently treated with hibiscus acid at 7 mg/ml alone or in conjunction with streptomycin did not have either STEC or Salmonella in their faecal samples, and none of the mice died. In contrast, the untreated mice and those exclusively treated with streptomycin had the pathogens present in their stool, leading to the mortality of all the subjects. We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Salmonella Typhimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against STEC and Salmonella. Fifteen sets of six mice in each set were utilised: six groups were orally exposed to 4 log10 colony forming units (CFUs) of S. Typhimurium and another six to STEC, and three acted as the controls. Six hours post-inoculation, specific groups of mice received either oral solutions containing hibiscus acid at 5 and 7 mg/ml; streptomycin at 50 and 450 µg/ml; hibiscus acid/streptomycin (5 mg/ml hibiscus acid and 50 µg/ml streptomycin); or isotonic saline. The study determined the MIC and MBC of 7 mg/ml of hibiscus acid; 300 and 450 µg/ml of streptomycin; and two concentrations of hibiscus/streptomycin (3 mg/ml / 20 µg/ml and 5 mg/ml / 50 µg/ml). Interestingly, the mice that were infected and subsequently treated with hibiscus acid at 7 mg/ml alone or in conjunction with streptomycin did not have either STEC or Salmonella in their faecal samples, and none of the mice died. In contrast, the untreated mice and those exclusively treated with streptomycin had the pathogens present in their stool, leading to the mortality of all the subjects. We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Salmonella Typhimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against STEC and Salmonella . Fifteen sets of six mice in each set were utilised: six groups were orally exposed to 4 log 10 colony forming units (CFUs) of S. Typhimurium and another six to STEC, and three acted as the controls. Six hours post-inoculation, specific groups of mice received either oral solutions containing hibiscus acid at 5 and 7 mg/ml; streptomycin at 50 and 450 μg/ml; hibiscus acid/streptomycin (5 mg/ml hibiscus acid and 50 μg/ml streptomycin); or isotonic saline. The study determined the MIC and MBC of 7 mg/ml of hibiscus acid; 300 and 450 μg/ml of streptomycin; and two concentrations of hibiscus/streptomycin (3 mg/ml / 20 μg/ml and 5 mg/ml / 50 μg/ml). Interestingly, the mice that were infected and subsequently treated with hibiscus acid at 7 mg/ml alone or in conjunction with streptomycin did not have either STEC or Salmonella in their faecal samples, and none of the mice died. In contrast, the untreated mice and those exclusively treated with streptomycin had the pathogens present in their stool, leading to the mortality of all the subjects. |
Author | Gomez-Aldapa, CA Falfan-Cortes, RN Rosas, JC Guzman-Ortiz, FA Rangel-Vargas, E |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: E surname: Rangel-Vargas fullname: Rangel-Vargas, E – sequence: 2 givenname: CA surname: Gomez-Aldapa fullname: Gomez-Aldapa, CA – sequence: 3 givenname: RN surname: Falfan-Cortes fullname: Falfan-Cortes, RN – sequence: 4 givenname: FA surname: Guzman-Ortiz fullname: Guzman-Ortiz, FA – sequence: 5 givenname: JC orcidid: 0000-0002-7823-8954 surname: Rosas fullname: Rosas, JC |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39021880$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpdks1uEzEQx1eoiKaFOye0EhcuS_2ZXXNBVQm0UhGXwtUaf2zisLEX21uJx-AN8ix5MpymrSinsWZ--s_M33NSHfngbVW9xug9bgnBZxjxM4IIbX4sbr4uPj2rZrhDvBFUkKNqhmjLm46R9rg6SWmNEBEYiRfVMRWI4K5Ds-rP-W7rIU8RhhrGMQbQqzqH3VaHjYLs_LIGn51yITvdRJtcyiVRj5BXYWl9qp3fbQd3a1MO-ueH-rKwSU-pTqAMRNf30BgbC2Dq1UMNtDM1lFiXjhuX9m1SGKbsgn9ZPe9hSPbVfTytvn9e3FxcNtffvlxdnF83mjGWG2XUnDLbMmM5aqF4wFBXUoYYynvdcq46I1QPRmHSKkEZMDI3QhhBteKYnlZXB10TYC3H6DYQf8sATt4lQlxKiGXpwUpMiGCUG2GQZkhxaDtgwgraEtFhbYrWx4PWOKmNNdr6XAx9Ivq04t1KLsOtxJhw3KL9NO_uFWL4NRUzZbFF22EAb8OUJEUdoUgIRgr69j90Haboi1eSYk5E282xKNSbf0d6nOXh6wuADoCOIaVo-0cEI3l3XeXB5f665OG66F_Xj8dV |
Cites_doi | 10.3390/antibiotics11050673 10.3390/molecules27030655 10.1016/S0732-8893(99)00031-0 10.1089/jmf.2020.0207 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.04.001 10.1089/jmf.2020.0135 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-452 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.12.018 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb15973.x 10.1155/2011/258185 10.1089/jmf.2020.0216 10.1016/j.fitote.2019.01.012 10.1371/journal.pone.0145416 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106712 10.1371/journal.pone.0004729 10.3390/antibiotics8040218 10.1111/jfs.12320 10.1111/eva.12185 10.1111/lam.12528 10.1086/420742 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005697 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-166 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.10.027 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright: © 2024 Rangel-Vargas et al. 2024. This work is published under https://www.agriculturejournals.cz/web/about/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. Copyright: © 2024 Rangel-Vargas et al. 2024 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright: © 2024 Rangel-Vargas et al. – notice: 2024. This work is published under https://www.agriculturejournals.cz/web/about/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: Copyright: © 2024 Rangel-Vargas et al. 2024 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7X2 8FE 8FH 8FK ABUWG AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO HCIFZ M0K PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.17221/105/2023-VETMED |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea SciTech Premium Collection Agriculture Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Agricultural Science Database Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Agricultural Science Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central - New (Subscription) url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Veterinary Medicine |
EISSN | 1805-9392 |
EndPage | 216 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_1229435d9d0c40b5a78a49e9372981cd PMC11251701 39021880 10_17221_105_2023_VETMED |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | 123 29Q 2WC 53G 5UV 5VS 7X2 A8Z AAYXX ABDBF ACUHS ADBBV AEGXH AENEX AFKRA ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ATCPS BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BHPHI CCPQU CITATION DIK DU5 DYU E3Z EBD ECGQY EOJEC ESX EYRJQ F5P GROUPED_DOAJ HCIFZ KQ8 M0K ML~ N.T OBODZ OK1 OVT OZF P2P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY RNS RPM TR2 TUS XSB C1A NPM 3V. 8FE 8FH 8FK ABUWG AZQEC DWQXO M~E PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 PUEGO 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-bdb634e74de507a023408b63d2d35fc755b8d9bfadb127b934a426d99d93cb513 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 0375-8427 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:28:47 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:33:05 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 14:26:43 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 04:02:42 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:08:19 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 03 08:30:27 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Keywords | Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli plant antimicrobial agents Salmonella Typhimurium synergistic effect |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 Copyright: © 2024 Rangel-Vargas et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c444t-bdb634e74de507a023408b63d2d35fc755b8d9bfadb127b934a426d99d93cb513 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-7823-8954 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/1229435d9d0c40b5a78a49e9372981cd |
PMID | 39021880 |
PQID | 3152978619 |
PQPubID | 5009628 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1229435d9d0c40b5a78a49e9372981cd pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11251701 proquest_miscellaneous_3082309942 proquest_journals_3152978619 pubmed_primary_39021880 crossref_primary_10_17221_105_2023_VETMED |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-Jun |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2024 text: 2024-Jun |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Czech Republic |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Czech Republic – name: Prague |
PublicationTitle | Veterinární medicína |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Vet Med (Praha) |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
Publisher_xml | – name: Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) – name: Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
References | ref13 ref12 ref15 ref14 ref11 ref10 ref0 ref2 ref1 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 WHO (ref23) 2023 ref24 CLSI (ref7) 2020 ref20 ref22 ref21 ref8 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 |
References_xml | – ident: ref22 doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11050673 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.3390/molecules27030655 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1016/S0732-8893(99)00031-0 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1089/jmf.2020.0207 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.04.001 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1089/jmf.2020.0135 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-452 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.12.018 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb15973.x – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1155/2011/258185 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1089/jmf.2020.0216 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2019.01.012 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145416 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106712 – ident: ref0 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004729 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8040218 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1111/jfs.12320 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1111/eva.12185 – volume-title: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. CLSI supplement M100. 30th ed year: 2020 ident: ref7 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1111/lam.12528 – volume-title: Antibiotic resistance year: 2023 ident: ref23 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1086/420742 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005697 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-166 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.10.027 |
SSID | ssj0029109 |
Score | 2.3397596 |
Snippet | We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing
(STEC) and... We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli... We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli... We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 207 |
SubjectTerms | Acid resistance Acids Antibiotic resistance E coli Feces Group theory Hibiscus sabdariffa Inoculation Livestock Minimum inhibitory concentration Multidrug resistance Original Paper Pathogens plant antimicrobial agents Roselle Salmonella salmonella typhimurium shiga-toxin-producing escherichia coli Streptomycin synergistic effect Toxins |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELZge-GCSnkFCjISFw4WiR_rmAtqYasV0lYItVVvkV9LI1VJabL9GfxmZhJnYRHilCi2YscznvnGM5kh5K1xlpceNpL3a8Ukj57ZYCUD3RKstsL54V-Y1el8eS6_XKrLdODWpbDKSSYOgjq0Hs_I3wtQNGDxAN7_ePODYdUo9K6mEhr3yR6I4FLNyN7x4vTrt63JBcpwAMBCK1ZKrpOjUnNegLxQaPoLdrE4Wy0-7yimIX__v0Dn37GTfyijk33yMKFIejSS_RG5F5sDcnCBoS3D_7V0lVzmj8nPIzok74TuU_5w2rcUPtpZDHmmsLS1q1t4EwPTG-Fk01MsVNwCb3W0bug1pqbtQXB-oEusHOQ3He2sCxYPfCwLMOhdDPRqarO-DtTClcJ4wEc4ysTiT8j5yeLs05KlIgzMSyl75oKbCxm1DBGgo4X1knkJjwIPQq29VsqVwbi1Da7g2hkhLSj9YEwwwjtViKdk1rRNfE5o1CFqncsYPZclABvn1hqM5LnVXoj1PCPvJgpUN2OujQptFKQW3KgKqVWN1MrIMZJo2w-zZA8P2tvvVdp0VcG5ATgYTMi9zJ2yurTSRIOuyrLwISOHE4GrtHW76jejZeTNthkWCz0ptontBvoM_kljJM_Is5EftjMRBmFTmWek3OGUnanutjT11ZDYu0C0qfPixf_n9ZI8gJWQY8DaIZn1t5v4CqBR714n_v8FIEYRew priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | A natural approach to combating antibiotic-resistant pathogens in livestock: Hibiscus sabdariffa-derived hibiscus acid as a promising solution |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39021880 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3152978619 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3082309942 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11251701 https://doaj.org/article/1229435d9d0c40b5a78a49e9372981cd |
Volume | 69 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9tAEF5KeumlNOlLbRq20EsPS6V9eLW9JY2DCTiUEof0JPYlIghSqeX8j_4D_xb_ss7oYeJQ6CUXy2gX7Xrm251vPKNZQj4ZZ3nuYSF5XyomefTMBisZ2JZgtRXOd-_CzC8ms4U8v1bX9476wpywvjxwL7gvGecGTHowIfUydcrq3EoTDYab8swH3H3B5o3O1OBqgRHsiK_QiuWS6yFAqTnPYJ9Q6PILdjW9nE9PdwxSV7f_X2TzYc7kPSN09oI8H9gjPe5nvU-exPqAHFxhSkv3Xi2dD6Hyl-TP8WbdVe2E_mPhcNo2mzVAzFlMdqYg1MpVDTyLgdONRLJuKR5R3ACqlrSqN-tbrErbwp75lc7w0CC_WtKldcHifz2WBRj3LgZ6M7ZZXwVq4UphRIAQDjOi-xVZnE0vv83YcP4C81LKlrngJkJGLUME1mhBZDLN4VbgQajSa6VcHowrbXAZ184IacHeB2OCEd6pTLwme3VTx7eERh2i1qmM0XOZA6dxrtTgH0-s9kKUk4R8HpVQ_OrLbBTonqDC4IsqUGFFr7CEnKCWtv2wQHZ3A2BTDLAp_gebhByOOi6GVbssBJAZ8KrBp0zIx20zCAuDKLaOzQr6dKFJYyRPyJseEtuZCIOMKU8Tku-AZWequy11ddPV9M6QaOo0e_cYP-49eQbykn1G2yHZa3-v4gfgTq07Ik9Pphfffxx1ywU_fy7-Aip7HgQ |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKe4ALgvJKKWAkOHCwSGxnHSMh1NKttrS7Qmhb9Zb6FboSStpuFsSf4KfwG5nJY2ER4tZTotiKLc-M5xvPeIaQF9oanjkQJOeKlEkeHDPeSAa6xRtlhHXNXZjxZDA6lh9O09M18rO_C4Nhlf2e2GzUvnJ4Rv5agKIBiwfw_ruLS4ZVo9C72pfQaNniMHz_Bibb_O3BHtD3Jef7w-n7EeuqCjAnpayZ9XYgZFDSB8BCBnSWjDP45LkXaeFUmtrMa1sYbxOurBbSgBbzWnstnE0TAf-9QTYAZmiQoo3d4eTjp6WJB8q3AdxCpSyTXHWOUcV5AvtTikcNgp0Mp-Ph3ooibOoF_Avk_h2r-Yfy279Dbneole60bHaXrIVyk2yeYChNc5-XjjsX_T3yY4c2yUKhe5-vnNYVhUW2BkOsKZByZmcV_ImBqY_wtawpFkaugJfndFbSL5gKt4aN-g0dYaUit5jTubHe4AGTYR4G_Ro8Pe_bjJt5auBJYTzgWxylF6n75PhayPOArJdVGR4RGpQPSsUyBMdlBkDK2kKBUT4wyglRDCLyqqdAftHm9sjRJkJqwUuaI7XylloR2UUSLfthVu7mQ3X1Oe-EPE8418AXXvvYydimRmVG6qDRNZolzkdkuydw3m0V8_w3Y0fk-bIZFgs9N6YM1QL6NP5QrSWPyMOWH5YzERphWhZHJFvhlJWprraUs_MmkXiC6FbFydb_5_WM3BxNx0f50cHk8DG5Basi22C5bbJeXy3CE4BltX3ayQIlZ9ctfr8ApSBOjA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%C2%A0natural+approach+to%C2%A0combating+antibiotic-resistant+pathogens+in%C2%A0livestock%3A+Hibiscus+sabdariffa-derived+hibiscus+acid+as+a+promising+solution&rft.jtitle=Veterin%C3%A1rn%C3%AD+medic%C3%ADna&rft.au=E+Rangel-Vargas&rft.au=CA+Gomez-Aldapa&rft.au=RN+Falfan-Cortes&rft.au=FA+Guzman-Ortiz&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.pub=Czech+Academy+of+Agricultural+Sciences&rft.issn=0375-8427&rft.eissn=1805-9392&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=216&rft_id=info:doi/10.17221%2F105%2F2023-VETMED&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_1229435d9d0c40b5a78a49e9372981cd |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0375-8427&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0375-8427&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0375-8427&client=summon |