A natural approach to combating antibiotic-resistant pathogens in livestock: Hibiscus sabdariffa-derived hibiscus acid as a promising solution

We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing (STEC) and Typhimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inVeterinární medicína Vol. 69; no. 6; pp. 207 - 216
Main Authors Rangel-Vargas, E, Gomez-Aldapa, CA, Falfan-Cortes, RN, Guzman-Ortiz, FA, Rosas, JC
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Czech Republic Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) 01.06.2024
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0375-8427
1805-9392
DOI10.17221/105/2023-VETMED

Cover

Loading…
Abstract We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing (STEC) and Typhimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against STEC and . Fifteen sets of six mice in each set were utilised: six groups were orally exposed to 4 log colony forming units (CFUs) of  Typhimurium and another six to STEC, and three acted as the controls. Six hours post-inoculation, specific groups of mice received either oral solutions containing hibiscus acid at 5 and 7 mg/ml; streptomycin at 50 and 450 μg/ml; hibiscus acid/streptomycin (5 mg/ml hibiscus acid and 50 μg/ml streptomycin); or isotonic saline. The study determined the MIC and MBC of 7 mg/ml of hibiscus acid; 300 and 450 μg/ml of streptomycin; and two concentrations of hibiscus/streptomycin (3 mg/ml / 20 μg/ml and 5 mg/ml / 50 μg/ml). Interestingly, the mice that were infected and subsequently treated with hibiscus acid at 7 mg/ml alone or in conjunction with streptomycin did not have either STEC or  in their faecal samples, and none of the mice died. In contrast, the untreated mice and those exclusively treated with streptomycin had the pathogens present in their stool, leading to the mortality of all the subjects.
AbstractList We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing (STEC) and Typhimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against STEC and . Fifteen sets of six mice in each set were utilised: six groups were orally exposed to 4 log colony forming units (CFUs) of  Typhimurium and another six to STEC, and three acted as the controls. Six hours post-inoculation, specific groups of mice received either oral solutions containing hibiscus acid at 5 and 7 mg/ml; streptomycin at 50 and 450 μg/ml; hibiscus acid/streptomycin (5 mg/ml hibiscus acid and 50 μg/ml streptomycin); or isotonic saline. The study determined the MIC and MBC of 7 mg/ml of hibiscus acid; 300 and 450 μg/ml of streptomycin; and two concentrations of hibiscus/streptomycin (3 mg/ml / 20 μg/ml and 5 mg/ml / 50 μg/ml). Interestingly, the mice that were infected and subsequently treated with hibiscus acid at 7 mg/ml alone or in conjunction with streptomycin did not have either STEC or  in their faecal samples, and none of the mice died. In contrast, the untreated mice and those exclusively treated with streptomycin had the pathogens present in their stool, leading to the mortality of all the subjects.
We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Salmonella Typhimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against STEC and Salmonella. Fifteen sets of six mice in each set were utilised: six groups were orally exposed to 4 log10 colony forming units (CFUs) of S. Typhimurium and another six to STEC, and three acted as the controls. Six hours post-inoculation, specific groups of mice received either oral solutions containing hibiscus acid at 5 and 7 mg/ml; streptomycin at 50 and 450 μg/ml; hibiscus acid/streptomycin (5 mg/ml hibiscus acid and 50 μg/ml streptomycin); or isotonic saline. The study determined the MIC and MBC of 7 mg/ml of hibiscus acid; 300 and 450 μg/ml of streptomycin; and two concentrations of hibiscus/streptomycin (3 mg/ml / 20 μg/ml and 5 mg/ml / 50 μg/ml). Interestingly, the mice that were infected and subsequently treated with hibiscus acid at 7 mg/ml alone or in conjunction with streptomycin did not have either STEC or Salmonella in their faecal samples, and none of the mice died. In contrast, the untreated mice and those exclusively treated with streptomycin had the pathogens present in their stool, leading to the mortality of all the subjects.We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Salmonella Typhimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against STEC and Salmonella. Fifteen sets of six mice in each set were utilised: six groups were orally exposed to 4 log10 colony forming units (CFUs) of S. Typhimurium and another six to STEC, and three acted as the controls. Six hours post-inoculation, specific groups of mice received either oral solutions containing hibiscus acid at 5 and 7 mg/ml; streptomycin at 50 and 450 μg/ml; hibiscus acid/streptomycin (5 mg/ml hibiscus acid and 50 μg/ml streptomycin); or isotonic saline. The study determined the MIC and MBC of 7 mg/ml of hibiscus acid; 300 and 450 μg/ml of streptomycin; and two concentrations of hibiscus/streptomycin (3 mg/ml / 20 μg/ml and 5 mg/ml / 50 μg/ml). Interestingly, the mice that were infected and subsequently treated with hibiscus acid at 7 mg/ml alone or in conjunction with streptomycin did not have either STEC or Salmonella in their faecal samples, and none of the mice died. In contrast, the untreated mice and those exclusively treated with streptomycin had the pathogens present in their stool, leading to the mortality of all the subjects.
We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and SalmonellaTyphimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against STEC and Salmonella. Fifteen sets of six mice in each set were utilised: six groups were orally exposed to 4 log10 colony forming units (CFUs) of S.Typhimurium and another six to STEC, and three acted as the controls. Six hours post-inoculation, specific groups of mice received either oral solutions containing hibiscus acid at 5 and 7 mg/ml; streptomycin at 50 and 450 µg/ml; hibiscus acid/streptomycin (5 mg/ml hibiscus acid and 50 µg/ml streptomycin); or isotonic saline. The study determined the MIC and MBC of 7 mg/ml of hibiscus acid; 300 and 450 µg/ml of streptomycin; and two concentrations of hibiscus/streptomycin (3 mg/ml / 20 µg/ml and 5 mg/ml / 50 µg/ml). Interestingly, the mice that were infected and subsequently treated with hibiscus acid at 7 mg/ml alone or in conjunction with streptomycin did not have either STEC or Salmonella in their faecal samples, and none of the mice died. In contrast, the untreated mice and those exclusively treated with streptomycin had the pathogens present in their stool, leading to the mortality of all the subjects.
We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Salmonella Typhimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against STEC and Salmonella. Fifteen sets of six mice in each set were utilised: six groups were orally exposed to 4 log10 colony forming units (CFUs) of S. Typhimurium and another six to STEC, and three acted as the controls. Six hours post-inoculation, specific groups of mice received either oral solutions containing hibiscus acid at 5 and 7 mg/ml; streptomycin at 50 and 450 µg/ml; hibiscus acid/streptomycin (5 mg/ml hibiscus acid and 50 µg/ml streptomycin); or isotonic saline. The study determined the MIC and MBC of 7 mg/ml of hibiscus acid; 300 and 450 µg/ml of streptomycin; and two concentrations of hibiscus/streptomycin (3 mg/ml / 20 µg/ml and 5 mg/ml / 50 µg/ml). Interestingly, the mice that were infected and subsequently treated with hibiscus acid at 7 mg/ml alone or in conjunction with streptomycin did not have either STEC or Salmonella in their faecal samples, and none of the mice died. In contrast, the untreated mice and those exclusively treated with streptomycin had the pathogens present in their stool, leading to the mortality of all the subjects.
We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Salmonella Typhimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against STEC and Salmonella . Fifteen sets of six mice in each set were utilised: six groups were orally exposed to 4 log 10 colony forming units (CFUs) of  S.  Typhimurium and another six to STEC, and three acted as the controls. Six hours post-inoculation, specific groups of mice received either oral solutions containing hibiscus acid at 5 and 7 mg/ml; streptomycin at 50 and 450 μg/ml; hibiscus acid/streptomycin (5 mg/ml hibiscus acid and 50 μg/ml streptomycin); or isotonic saline. The study determined the MIC and MBC of 7 mg/ml of hibiscus acid; 300 and 450 μg/ml of streptomycin; and two concentrations of hibiscus/streptomycin (3 mg/ml / 20 μg/ml and 5 mg/ml / 50 μg/ml). Interestingly, the mice that were infected and subsequently treated with hibiscus acid at 7 mg/ml alone or in conjunction with streptomycin did not have either STEC or  Salmonella in their faecal samples, and none of the mice died. In contrast, the untreated mice and those exclusively treated with streptomycin had the pathogens present in their stool, leading to the mortality of all the subjects.
Author Gomez-Aldapa, CA
Falfan-Cortes, RN
Rosas, JC
Guzman-Ortiz, FA
Rangel-Vargas, E
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: E
  surname: Rangel-Vargas
  fullname: Rangel-Vargas, E
– sequence: 2
  givenname: CA
  surname: Gomez-Aldapa
  fullname: Gomez-Aldapa, CA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: RN
  surname: Falfan-Cortes
  fullname: Falfan-Cortes, RN
– sequence: 4
  givenname: FA
  surname: Guzman-Ortiz
  fullname: Guzman-Ortiz, FA
– sequence: 5
  givenname: JC
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7823-8954
  surname: Rosas
  fullname: Rosas, JC
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39021880$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpdks1uEzEQx1eoiKaFOye0EhcuS_2ZXXNBVQm0UhGXwtUaf2zisLEX21uJx-AN8ix5MpymrSinsWZ--s_M33NSHfngbVW9xug9bgnBZxjxM4IIbX4sbr4uPj2rZrhDvBFUkKNqhmjLm46R9rg6SWmNEBEYiRfVMRWI4K5Ds-rP-W7rIU8RhhrGMQbQqzqH3VaHjYLs_LIGn51yITvdRJtcyiVRj5BXYWl9qp3fbQd3a1MO-ueH-rKwSU-pTqAMRNf30BgbC2Dq1UMNtDM1lFiXjhuX9m1SGKbsgn9ZPe9hSPbVfTytvn9e3FxcNtffvlxdnF83mjGWG2XUnDLbMmM5aqF4wFBXUoYYynvdcq46I1QPRmHSKkEZMDI3QhhBteKYnlZXB10TYC3H6DYQf8sATt4lQlxKiGXpwUpMiGCUG2GQZkhxaDtgwgraEtFhbYrWx4PWOKmNNdr6XAx9Ivq04t1KLsOtxJhw3KL9NO_uFWL4NRUzZbFF22EAb8OUJEUdoUgIRgr69j90Haboi1eSYk5E282xKNSbf0d6nOXh6wuADoCOIaVo-0cEI3l3XeXB5f665OG66F_Xj8dV
Cites_doi 10.3390/antibiotics11050673
10.3390/molecules27030655
10.1016/S0732-8893(99)00031-0
10.1089/jmf.2020.0207
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.04.001
10.1089/jmf.2020.0135
10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-452
10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.12.018
10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb15973.x
10.1155/2011/258185
10.1089/jmf.2020.0216
10.1016/j.fitote.2019.01.012
10.1371/journal.pone.0145416
10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106712
10.1371/journal.pone.0004729
10.3390/antibiotics8040218
10.1111/jfs.12320
10.1111/eva.12185
10.1111/lam.12528
10.1086/420742
10.1371/journal.pntd.0005697
10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-166
10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.10.027
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright: © 2024 Rangel-Vargas et al.
2024. This work is published under https://www.agriculturejournals.cz/web/about/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright: © 2024 Rangel-Vargas et al. 2024
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright: © 2024 Rangel-Vargas et al.
– notice: 2024. This work is published under https://www.agriculturejournals.cz/web/about/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: Copyright: © 2024 Rangel-Vargas et al. 2024
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7X2
8FE
8FH
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
ATCPS
AZQEC
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
HCIFZ
M0K
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.17221/105/2023-VETMED
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Agricultural Science Collection
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
SciTech Premium Collection
Agriculture Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Agricultural Science Database
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Agricultural Science Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Agricultural Science Database


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central - New (Subscription)
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Veterinary Medicine
EISSN 1805-9392
EndPage 216
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_1229435d9d0c40b5a78a49e9372981cd
PMC11251701
39021880
10_17221_105_2023_VETMED
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID 123
29Q
2WC
53G
5UV
5VS
7X2
A8Z
AAYXX
ABDBF
ACUHS
ADBBV
AEGXH
AENEX
AFKRA
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ATCPS
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
CITATION
DIK
DU5
DYU
E3Z
EBD
ECGQY
EOJEC
ESX
EYRJQ
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
HCIFZ
KQ8
M0K
ML~
N.T
OBODZ
OK1
OVT
OZF
P2P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
RNS
RPM
TR2
TUS
XSB
C1A
NPM
3V.
8FE
8FH
8FK
ABUWG
AZQEC
DWQXO
M~E
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
PUEGO
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-bdb634e74de507a023408b63d2d35fc755b8d9bfadb127b934a426d99d93cb513
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 0375-8427
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:28:47 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:33:05 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 14:26:43 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 13 04:02:42 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:08:19 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 03 08:30:27 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli
plant antimicrobial agents
Salmonella Typhimurium
synergistic effect
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Copyright: © 2024 Rangel-Vargas et al.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c444t-bdb634e74de507a023408b63d2d35fc755b8d9bfadb127b934a426d99d93cb513
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-7823-8954
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/1229435d9d0c40b5a78a49e9372981cd
PMID 39021880
PQID 3152978619
PQPubID 5009628
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1229435d9d0c40b5a78a49e9372981cd
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11251701
proquest_miscellaneous_3082309942
proquest_journals_3152978619
pubmed_primary_39021880
crossref_primary_10_17221_105_2023_VETMED
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-Jun
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-Jun
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Czech Republic
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Czech Republic
– name: Prague
PublicationTitle Veterinární medicína
PublicationTitleAlternate Vet Med (Praha)
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS)
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Publisher_xml – name: Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS)
– name: Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
References ref13
ref12
ref15
ref14
ref11
ref10
ref0
ref2
ref1
ref17
ref16
ref19
ref18
WHO (ref23) 2023
ref24
CLSI (ref7) 2020
ref20
ref22
ref21
ref8
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
References_xml – ident: ref22
  doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11050673
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.3390/molecules27030655
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1016/S0732-8893(99)00031-0
– ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1089/jmf.2020.0207
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.04.001
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1089/jmf.2020.0135
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-452
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.12.018
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb15973.x
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.1155/2011/258185
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1089/jmf.2020.0216
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2019.01.012
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145416
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106712
– ident: ref0
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004729
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8040218
– ident: ref20
  doi: 10.1111/jfs.12320
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.1111/eva.12185
– volume-title: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. CLSI supplement M100. 30th ed
  year: 2020
  ident: ref7
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.1111/lam.12528
– volume-title: Antibiotic resistance
  year: 2023
  ident: ref23
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1086/420742
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005697
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-166
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.10.027
SSID ssj0029109
Score 2.3397596
Snippet We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing (STEC) and...
We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli...
We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli...
We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 207
SubjectTerms Acid resistance
Acids
Antibiotic resistance
E coli
Feces
Group theory
Hibiscus sabdariffa
Inoculation
Livestock
Minimum inhibitory concentration
Multidrug resistance
Original Paper
Pathogens
plant antimicrobial agents
Roselle
Salmonella
salmonella typhimurium
shiga-toxin-producing escherichia coli
Streptomycin
synergistic effect
Toxins
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELZge-GCSnkFCjISFw4WiR_rmAtqYasV0lYItVVvkV9LI1VJabL9GfxmZhJnYRHilCi2YscznvnGM5kh5K1xlpceNpL3a8Ukj57ZYCUD3RKstsL54V-Y1el8eS6_XKrLdODWpbDKSSYOgjq0Hs_I3wtQNGDxAN7_ePODYdUo9K6mEhr3yR6I4FLNyN7x4vTrt63JBcpwAMBCK1ZKrpOjUnNegLxQaPoLdrE4Wy0-7yimIX__v0Dn37GTfyijk33yMKFIejSS_RG5F5sDcnCBoS3D_7V0lVzmj8nPIzok74TuU_5w2rcUPtpZDHmmsLS1q1t4EwPTG-Fk01MsVNwCb3W0bug1pqbtQXB-oEusHOQ3He2sCxYPfCwLMOhdDPRqarO-DtTClcJ4wEc4ysTiT8j5yeLs05KlIgzMSyl75oKbCxm1DBGgo4X1knkJjwIPQq29VsqVwbi1Da7g2hkhLSj9YEwwwjtViKdk1rRNfE5o1CFqncsYPZclABvn1hqM5LnVXoj1PCPvJgpUN2OujQptFKQW3KgKqVWN1MrIMZJo2w-zZA8P2tvvVdp0VcG5ATgYTMi9zJ2yurTSRIOuyrLwISOHE4GrtHW76jejZeTNthkWCz0ptontBvoM_kljJM_Is5EftjMRBmFTmWek3OGUnanutjT11ZDYu0C0qfPixf_n9ZI8gJWQY8DaIZn1t5v4CqBR714n_v8FIEYRew
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title A natural approach to combating antibiotic-resistant pathogens in livestock: Hibiscus sabdariffa-derived hibiscus acid as a promising solution
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39021880
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3152978619
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3082309942
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11251701
https://doaj.org/article/1229435d9d0c40b5a78a49e9372981cd
Volume 69
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9tAEF5KeumlNOlLbRq20EsPS6V9eLW9JY2DCTiUEof0JPYlIghSqeX8j_4D_xb_ss7oYeJQ6CUXy2gX7Xrm251vPKNZQj4ZZ3nuYSF5XyomefTMBisZ2JZgtRXOd-_CzC8ms4U8v1bX9476wpywvjxwL7gvGecGTHowIfUydcrq3EoTDYab8swH3H3B5o3O1OBqgRHsiK_QiuWS6yFAqTnPYJ9Q6PILdjW9nE9PdwxSV7f_X2TzYc7kPSN09oI8H9gjPe5nvU-exPqAHFxhSkv3Xi2dD6Hyl-TP8WbdVe2E_mPhcNo2mzVAzFlMdqYg1MpVDTyLgdONRLJuKR5R3ACqlrSqN-tbrErbwp75lc7w0CC_WtKldcHifz2WBRj3LgZ6M7ZZXwVq4UphRIAQDjOi-xVZnE0vv83YcP4C81LKlrngJkJGLUME1mhBZDLN4VbgQajSa6VcHowrbXAZ184IacHeB2OCEd6pTLwme3VTx7eERh2i1qmM0XOZA6dxrtTgH0-s9kKUk4R8HpVQ_OrLbBTonqDC4IsqUGFFr7CEnKCWtv2wQHZ3A2BTDLAp_gebhByOOi6GVbssBJAZ8KrBp0zIx20zCAuDKLaOzQr6dKFJYyRPyJseEtuZCIOMKU8Tku-AZWequy11ddPV9M6QaOo0e_cYP-49eQbykn1G2yHZa3-v4gfgTq07Ik9Pphfffxx1ywU_fy7-Aip7HgQ
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKe4ALgvJKKWAkOHCwSGxnHSMh1NKttrS7Qmhb9Zb6FboSStpuFsSf4KfwG5nJY2ER4tZTotiKLc-M5xvPeIaQF9oanjkQJOeKlEkeHDPeSAa6xRtlhHXNXZjxZDA6lh9O09M18rO_C4Nhlf2e2GzUvnJ4Rv5agKIBiwfw_ruLS4ZVo9C72pfQaNniMHz_Bibb_O3BHtD3Jef7w-n7EeuqCjAnpayZ9XYgZFDSB8BCBnSWjDP45LkXaeFUmtrMa1sYbxOurBbSgBbzWnstnE0TAf-9QTYAZmiQoo3d4eTjp6WJB8q3AdxCpSyTXHWOUcV5AvtTikcNgp0Mp-Ph3ooibOoF_Avk_h2r-Yfy279Dbneole60bHaXrIVyk2yeYChNc5-XjjsX_T3yY4c2yUKhe5-vnNYVhUW2BkOsKZByZmcV_ImBqY_wtawpFkaugJfndFbSL5gKt4aN-g0dYaUit5jTubHe4AGTYR4G_Ro8Pe_bjJt5auBJYTzgWxylF6n75PhayPOArJdVGR4RGpQPSsUyBMdlBkDK2kKBUT4wyglRDCLyqqdAftHm9sjRJkJqwUuaI7XylloR2UUSLfthVu7mQ3X1Oe-EPE8418AXXvvYydimRmVG6qDRNZolzkdkuydw3m0V8_w3Y0fk-bIZFgs9N6YM1QL6NP5QrSWPyMOWH5YzERphWhZHJFvhlJWprraUs_MmkXiC6FbFydb_5_WM3BxNx0f50cHk8DG5Basi22C5bbJeXy3CE4BltX3ayQIlZ9ctfr8ApSBOjA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%C2%A0natural+approach+to%C2%A0combating+antibiotic-resistant+pathogens+in%C2%A0livestock%3A+Hibiscus+sabdariffa-derived+hibiscus+acid+as+a+promising+solution&rft.jtitle=Veterin%C3%A1rn%C3%AD+medic%C3%ADna&rft.au=E+Rangel-Vargas&rft.au=CA+Gomez-Aldapa&rft.au=RN+Falfan-Cortes&rft.au=FA+Guzman-Ortiz&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.pub=Czech+Academy+of+Agricultural+Sciences&rft.issn=0375-8427&rft.eissn=1805-9392&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=216&rft_id=info:doi/10.17221%2F105%2F2023-VETMED&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_1229435d9d0c40b5a78a49e9372981cd
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0375-8427&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0375-8427&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0375-8427&client=summon