Changing trends in the decision-making preferences of women with early breast cancer
Background: Previous studies have indicated a predominance of passive decision‐making styles among women with early‐stage breast cancer in the UK offered a choice between breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. The aim of this study was to determine current decision‐making styles and establi...
Saved in:
| Published in | British journal of surgery Vol. 95; no. 3; pp. 312 - 318 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Chichester, UK
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
01.03.2008
Wiley Oxford University Press |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Background:
Previous studies have indicated a predominance of passive decision‐making styles among women with early‐stage breast cancer in the UK offered a choice between breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. The aim of this study was to determine current decision‐making styles and establish their association with operation choice and breast unit mastectomy rate.
Methods:
A questionnaire survey was conducted among women from three specialist breast units representing high, medium and low case mix‐adjusted mastectomy rates.
Results:
Of 697 consecutive patients, 356 (51·1 per cent) completed the questionnaire, a mean of 6·9 (range 1·3–48·6) weeks after surgery. Some 262 women (73·6 per cent) underwent BCS and 94 (26·4 per cent) had a mastectomy. Some 218 patients (61·2 per cent) achieved their preferred decision‐making style. The proportions of women achieving an active decision‐making style were high, particularly for those choosing mastectomy (83 versus 58·0 per cent for BCS; P < 0·001) and in the high mastectomy rate unit (79·6 versus 53 and 52·2 per cent for medium and low rate units respectively; P < 0·001).
Conclusion:
More women chose an active decision‐making style than in previous UK studies. The provision of greater treatment selection autonomy to women suitable for BCS may not reduce mastectomy rates. Copyright © 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Women may not always choose breast conservation |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Previous studies have indicated a predominance of passive decision-making styles among women with early-stage breast cancer in the UK offered a choice between breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. The aim of this study was to determine current decision-making styles and establish their association with operation choice and breast unit mastectomy rate.
A questionnaire survey was conducted among women from three specialist breast units representing high, medium and low case mix-adjusted mastectomy rates.
Of 697 consecutive patients, 356 (51.1 per cent) completed the questionnaire, a mean of 6.9 (range 1.3-48.6) weeks after surgery. Some 262 women (73.6 per cent) underwent BCS and 94 (26.4 per cent) had a mastectomy. Some 218 patients (61.2 per cent) achieved their preferred decision-making style. The proportions of women achieving an active decision-making style were high, particularly for those choosing mastectomy (83 versus 58.0 per cent for BCS; P < 0.001) and in the high mastectomy rate unit (79.6 versus 53 and 52.2 per cent for medium and low rate units respectively; P < 0.001).
More women chose an active decision-making style than in previous UK studies. The provision of greater treatment selection autonomy to women suitable for BCS may not reduce mastectomy rates. Background: Previous studies have indicated a predominance of passive decision‐making styles among women with early‐stage breast cancer in the UK offered a choice between breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. The aim of this study was to determine current decision‐making styles and establish their association with operation choice and breast unit mastectomy rate. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted among women from three specialist breast units representing high, medium and low case mix‐adjusted mastectomy rates. Results: Of 697 consecutive patients, 356 (51·1 per cent) completed the questionnaire, a mean of 6·9 (range 1·3–48·6) weeks after surgery. Some 262 women (73·6 per cent) underwent BCS and 94 (26·4 per cent) had a mastectomy. Some 218 patients (61·2 per cent) achieved their preferred decision‐making style. The proportions of women achieving an active decision‐making style were high, particularly for those choosing mastectomy (83 versus 58·0 per cent for BCS; P < 0·001) and in the high mastectomy rate unit (79·6 versus 53 and 52·2 per cent for medium and low rate units respectively; P < 0·001). Conclusion: More women chose an active decision‐making style than in previous UK studies. The provision of greater treatment selection autonomy to women suitable for BCS may not reduce mastectomy rates. Copyright © 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Women may not always choose breast conservation Women may not always choose breast conservation Previous studies have indicated a predominance of passive decision-making styles among women with early-stage breast cancer in the UK offered a choice between breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. The aim of this study was to determine current decision-making styles and establish their association with operation choice and breast unit mastectomy rate.BACKGROUNDPrevious studies have indicated a predominance of passive decision-making styles among women with early-stage breast cancer in the UK offered a choice between breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. The aim of this study was to determine current decision-making styles and establish their association with operation choice and breast unit mastectomy rate.A questionnaire survey was conducted among women from three specialist breast units representing high, medium and low case mix-adjusted mastectomy rates.METHODSA questionnaire survey was conducted among women from three specialist breast units representing high, medium and low case mix-adjusted mastectomy rates.Of 697 consecutive patients, 356 (51.1 per cent) completed the questionnaire, a mean of 6.9 (range 1.3-48.6) weeks after surgery. Some 262 women (73.6 per cent) underwent BCS and 94 (26.4 per cent) had a mastectomy. Some 218 patients (61.2 per cent) achieved their preferred decision-making style. The proportions of women achieving an active decision-making style were high, particularly for those choosing mastectomy (83 versus 58.0 per cent for BCS; P < 0.001) and in the high mastectomy rate unit (79.6 versus 53 and 52.2 per cent for medium and low rate units respectively; P < 0.001).RESULTSOf 697 consecutive patients, 356 (51.1 per cent) completed the questionnaire, a mean of 6.9 (range 1.3-48.6) weeks after surgery. Some 262 women (73.6 per cent) underwent BCS and 94 (26.4 per cent) had a mastectomy. Some 218 patients (61.2 per cent) achieved their preferred decision-making style. The proportions of women achieving an active decision-making style were high, particularly for those choosing mastectomy (83 versus 58.0 per cent for BCS; P < 0.001) and in the high mastectomy rate unit (79.6 versus 53 and 52.2 per cent for medium and low rate units respectively; P < 0.001).More women chose an active decision-making style than in previous UK studies. The provision of greater treatment selection autonomy to women suitable for BCS may not reduce mastectomy rates.CONCLUSIONMore women chose an active decision-making style than in previous UK studies. The provision of greater treatment selection autonomy to women suitable for BCS may not reduce mastectomy rates. |
| Author | Caldon, L. J. M. Reed, M. W. R. Walters, S. J. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: L. J. M. surname: Caldon fullname: Caldon, L. J. M. email: l.caldon@sheffield.ac.uk organization: Academic Unit of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK – sequence: 2 givenname: S. J. surname: Walters fullname: Walters, S. J. organization: Medical Statistics Group, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK – sequence: 3 givenname: M. W. R. surname: Reed fullname: Reed, M. W. R. organization: Academic Unit of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK |
| BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20122108$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17853508$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpVkUFv1DAQhS1URLcLEr8A-QK3lHFsx84J0RVtQRUcKCBxsRxnsus2cbZ2lmX_fRO6bGEuc5hv3mjeOyFHoQ9IyEsGpwwgf1vdpFNZFuIJmTFeyCxnhT4iMwBQGeM5PyYnKd0AMA4yf0aOmdKSS9Azcr1Y2bD0YUmHiKFO1Ac6rJDW6Hzyfcg6eztN1xEbHAmHifYN3fYdBrr1w4qije2OVhFtGqizIxGfk6eNbRO-2Pc5-Xb-4XpxmV19ufi4eH-VOTFWVooaLdeu5lZDI3ThpAZma665UoC61qVzlRZYusYWoimUkpVoNBu_K6WQfE7ePeiuN1WHtcMwRNuadfSdjTvTW2_-nwS_Msv-l2FMCJjsmJM3e4XY320wDabzyWHb2oD9JhkFnAlWTuCrf08dbvx1cgRe7wGbnG2bODrh04HLgeU5-8NlD9zWt7h71AEzJWnGJM2UpDn79HXqj7xPA_4-8DbemkJxJc2Pzxfmuzw_g8W4_pPfA7MuoSI |
| CODEN | BJSUAM |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_pon_6294 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_008_0077_3 crossref_primary_10_1188_14_ONF_411_419 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breast_2012_10_001 crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_013_3038_y crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_2011_40_2909 crossref_primary_10_1186_1472_6947_14_25 crossref_primary_10_4103_2347_5625_159351 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clbc_2022_10_007 crossref_primary_10_3109_17453054_2012_690132 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pcorm_2021_100214 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12609_014_0159_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clbc_2017_11_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2016_06_025 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2011_04_014 crossref_primary_10_1093_annonc_mdt193 crossref_primary_10_1080_17496535_2011_622502 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breast_2008_08_001 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_12277 crossref_primary_10_1093_annonc_mdp534 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2017_12_001 crossref_primary_10_1200_EDBK_390450 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_017_1184_6 crossref_primary_10_1002_pon_3316 crossref_primary_10_1002_pon_3735 crossref_primary_10_1002_pon_3853 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2753_2012_01915_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breast_2017_10_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2020_09_029 crossref_primary_10_1177_1049909115588302 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breast_2018_02_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2015_05_022 crossref_primary_10_1038_bjc_2011_141 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2008 INIST-CNRS 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2007 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. – notice: 2008 INIST-CNRS – notice: 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. – notice: Copyright © 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2007 |
| DBID | BSCLL IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
| DOI | 10.1002/bjs.5964 |
| DatabaseName | Istex Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| EISSN | 1365-2168 |
| EndPage | 318 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 17853508 20122108 BJS5964 ark_67375_WNG_V5FB0C02_Z |
| Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Multicenter Study Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Cancer Research UK – fundername: ; |
| GroupedDBID | --- .3N .55 .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1L6 1OB 1OC 1ZS 23N 31~ 33P 36B 3O- 3SF 3WU 4.4 4ZD 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 5WD 66C 6J9 6P2 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8F7 8UM 930 A01 A03 AABZA AACZT AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAONW AAPGJ AAPXW AAQQT AARHZ AAUAY AAVAP AAWDT AAYEP AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEJV ABEML ABIJN ABJNI ABLJU ABNHQ ABOCM ABPQP ABPTD ABPVW ABQNK ABWST ABXVV ACBWZ ACCFJ ACFBH ACFRR ACGFO ACGFS ACMXC ACPOU ACSCC ACUTJ ACXQS ACYHN ACZBC ADBBV ADEOM ADIPN ADIYS ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADQBN ADVEK ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEGXH AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AFBPY AFFNX AFFZL AFGKR AFPWT AFXAL AFYAG AFYLJ AFZJQ AGMDO AGQXC AGUTN AHMBA AI. AIAGR AIURR AIWBW AJAOE AJBDE AJEEA ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMBMR AMYDB APJGH AQDSO ASPBG ATGXG ATUGU AVNTJ AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BCRHZ BDRZF BEYMZ BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBS EJD EMOBN ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FLUFQ FOEOM FUBAC G-S G.N GNP GODZA H.X H13 HBH HF~ HHY HHZ HVGLF HZ~ IH2 IHE IX1 J0M J5H JPC KBUDW KOP KQQ KSI KSN L7B LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES M65 MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N4W N9A NF~ NNB NOMLY O66 O9- OAUYM OCZFY OHH OIG OJZSN OPAEJ OVD OWPYF P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K RGB RIG RIWAO RJQFR ROL ROX RWI RX1 RYL SUPJJ TEORI TMA UB1 V2E V8K V9Y VH1 VVN W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHWMO WIB WIH WIJ WIK WJL WOHZO WQJ WRC WUP WVDHM WXI X7M XG1 XV2 YFH YOC YUY ZGI ZXP ZY1 ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AASNB 08R AAPBV AAUGY AAVGM ABHUG ABPTK ABWRO ACSMX ACXME ADAWD ADDAD AFVGU AGJLS AKALU ALXQX BFHJK BYORX IQODW OBFPC ZA5 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4444-94dea38cd3a80f486c5801ad383770e8d89ccb84e9cfa64f6775b4f8116895453 |
| IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
| ISSN | 0007-1323 1365-2168 |
| IngestDate | Wed Oct 02 05:41:55 EDT 2024 Sat Oct 26 02:13:30 EDT 2024 Sat Nov 02 11:59:07 EDT 2024 Sun Oct 22 16:06:36 EDT 2023 Sat Aug 24 01:00:29 EDT 2024 Wed Oct 30 10:01:11 EDT 2024 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Keywords | Human Decision making Trend Breast cancer Change Malignant tumor Medicine Mammary gland diseases Treatment Preference Surgery Adult Female Early Mammary gland Woman Cancer |
| Language | English |
| License | CC BY 4.0 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4444-94dea38cd3a80f486c5801ad383770e8d89ccb84e9cfa64f6775b4f8116895453 |
| Notes | Cancer Research UK ark:/67375/WNG-V5FB0C02-Z istex:CCF6C59B929A436CDAD3CEA22EF7E3FFE8B04B29 ArticleID:BJS5964 Presented in part to the BJS prize session of the Annual Scientific Meeting of the British Association of Surgical Oncology ∼ the Association for Cancer Surgery, London, UK, November 2006, and published in abstract form as Eur J Surg Oncol 2006; 32(Suppl): 1028 (Suppl): 1028 2006 Presented in part to the BJS prize session of the Annual Scientific Meeting of the British Association of Surgical Oncology ∼ the Association for Cancer Surgery, London, UK, November 2006, and published in abstract form as Eur J Surg Oncol 32 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://academic.oup.com/bjs/article-pdf/95/3/312/36711925/bjs5964.pdf |
| PMID | 17853508 |
| PQID | 70314191 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 7 |
| ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11440001 proquest_miscellaneous_70314191 pubmed_primary_17853508 pascalfrancis_primary_20122108 wiley_primary_10_1002_bjs_5964_BJS5964 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_V5FB0C02_Z |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | March 2008 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2008-03-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2008 text: March 2008 |
| PublicationDecade | 2000 |
| PublicationPlace | Chichester, UK |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Chichester, UK – name: Chichester – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | British journal of surgery |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Br J Surg |
| PublicationYear | 2008 |
| Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Wiley Oxford University Press |
| Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd – name: Wiley – name: Oxford University Press |
| References | van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, Legrand C, Sylvester RJ, Tong D et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 1143-1150. Strull WM, Lo B, Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making? JAMA 1984; 252: 2990-2994. Janz NK, Wren PA, Copeland LA, Lowery JC, Goldfarb SL, Wilkins EG. Patient-physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 3091-3098. Iscoe NA, Goel V, Wu K, Fehringer G, Holowaty EJ, Naylor CD. Variation in breast cancer surgery in Ontario. CMAJ 1994; 150: 345-352. O'Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Rovner D, Holmes-Rovner M et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (2):CD001431. Moyer A, Salovey P. Patient participation in treatment decision making and the psychological consequences of breast cancer surgery. Womens Health 1998; 4: 103-116. Kotwall CA, Maxwell JG, Covington DL, Churchill P, Smith SE, Covan EK. Clinicopathologic factors and patient perceptions associated with surgical breast-conserving treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 1996; 3: 169-175. Hack TF, Degner LF, Watson P, Sinha L. Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 2006; 15: 9-19. Caldon LJ, Walters SJ, Reed JA, Murphy A, Worley A, Reed MW. Case-mix fails to explain variation in mastectomy rates: management of screen-detected breast cancer in a UK region 1997-2003. Br J Cancer 2005; 92: 55-59. Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire P, Baum M, A'Hern RP. A question of choice: results of a prospective 3-year follow-up study of women with breast cancer. The Breast 1994; 3: 202-208. Sauven P, Bishop H, Patnick J, Walton J, Wheeler E, Lawrence G. The National Health Service Breast Screening Programme and British Association of Surgical Oncology audit of quality assurance in breast screening 1996-2001. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 82-87. Molenaar S, Sprangers MA, Rutgers EJ, Luiten EJ, Mulder J, Bossuyt PM et al. Decision support for patients with early-stage breast cancer: effects of an interactive breast cancer CDROM on treatment decision, satisfaction, and quality of life. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 1676-1687. Gysels M, Higginson IJ. Interactive technologies and videotapes for patient education in cancer care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Support Care Cancer 2007; 15: 7-20. Wallberg B, Michelson H, Nystedt M, Bolund C, Degner LF, Wilking N. Information needs and preferences for participation in treatment decisions among Swedish breast cancer patients. Acta Oncol 2000; 39: 467-476. Degner LF, Sloan JA. Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 941-950. Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, Sloan JA, Carriere KC, O'Neil J et al. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA 1997; 277: 1485-1492. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ 1995; 152: 1423-1433. Ishizaki T, Imanaka Y, Hirose M, Kuwabara K, Ogawa T, Harada Y. A first look at variations in use of breast conserving surgery at five teaching hospitals in Japan. Int J Qual Health Care 2002; 14: 411-418. Mastaglia B, Kristjanson LJ. Factors influencing women's decisions for choice of surgery for stage I and stage II breast cancer in Western Australia. J Adv Nurs 2001; 35: 836-847. Deadman JM, Leinster SJ, Owens RG, Dewey ME, Slade PD. Taking responsibility for cancer treatment. Soc Sci Med 2001; 53: 669-677. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1227-1232. Osteen RT, Steele GD Jr, Menck HR, Winchester DP. Regional differences in surgical management of breast cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 1992; 42: 39-43. Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A, Schwartz K, Liu L, Lakhani I et al. Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer. Health Serv Res 2005; 40: 745-767. Davison BJ, Degner LF. Feasibility of using a computer-assisted intervention to enhance the way women with breast cancer communicate with their physicians. Cancer Nurs 2002; 25: 417-424. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1233-1241. Keating NL, Guadagnoli E, Landrum MB, Borbas C, Weeks JC. Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients' desired level of involvement? J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 1473-1479. Beaver K, Luker KA, Owens RG, Leinster SJ, Degner LF, Sloan JA. Treatment decision making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 1996; 19: 8-19. Whelan T, Levine M, Willan A, Gafni A, Sanders K, Mirsky D et al. Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004; 292: 435-441. Irwig L, Bennetts A. Quality of life after breast conservation or mastectomy: a systematic review. Aust N Z J Surg 1997; 67: 750-754. Scorpiglione N, Nicolucci A, Grilli R, Angiolini C, Belfiglio M, Carinci F et al. Appropriateness and variation of surgical treatment of breast cancer in Italy: when excellence in clinical research does not match with generalized good quality care. Progetto Oncologia Femminile. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 345-352. Moyer A. Psychosocial outcomes of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: a meta-analytic review. Health Psychol 1997; 16: 284-298. Street RL Jr, Voigt B. Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life. Med Decis Making 1997; 17: 298-306. McCready D, Holloway C, Shelley W, Down N, Robinson P, Sinclair S et al. Surgical management of early stage invasive breast cancer: a practice guideline. Can J Surg 2005; 48: 185-194. Lam W, Fielding R, Chan M, Chow L, Ho E. Participation and satisfaction with surgical treatment decision-making in breast cancer among Chinese women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2003; 80: 171-180. 2004; 22 2002; 14 2003; 80 1996; 19 1994; 150 1997; 67 2006; 15 1997; 277 2005; 40 2000; 92 2003 2005; 48 1995; 152 2007; 15 2002; 25 1984; 252 2003; 90 2000; 39 2002; 20 1995; 48 2004; 292 2001; 19 1997; 17 2002; 347 1997; 16 2005; 92 1992; 42 1994; 3 2001; 35 1998; 4 1992; 45 1996; 3 2001; 53 |
| References_xml | – volume: 20 start-page: 1473 year: 2002 end-page: 1479 article-title: Treatment decision making in early‐stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients' desired level of involvement? publication-title: J Clin Oncol – volume: 19 start-page: 1676 year: 2001 end-page: 1687 article-title: Decision support for patients with early‐stage breast cancer: effects of an interactive breast cancer CDROM on treatment decision, satisfaction, and quality of life publication-title: J Clin Oncol – volume: 92 start-page: 55 year: 2005 end-page: 59 article-title: Case‐mix fails to explain variation in mastectomy rates: management of screen‐detected breast cancer in a UK region 1997–2003 publication-title: Br J Cancer – volume: 80 start-page: 171 year: 2003 end-page: 180 article-title: Participation and satisfaction with surgical treatment decision‐making in breast cancer among Chinese women publication-title: Breast Cancer Res Treat – volume: 14 start-page: 411 year: 2002 end-page: 418 article-title: A first look at variations in use of breast conserving surgery at five teaching hospitals in Japan publication-title: Int J Qual Health Care – volume: 40 start-page: 745 year: 2005 end-page: 767 article-title: Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population‐based sample of women with breast cancer publication-title: Health Serv Res – volume: 48 start-page: 345 year: 1995 end-page: 352 article-title: Appropriateness and variation of surgical treatment of breast cancer in Italy: when excellence in clinical research does not match with generalized good quality care. Progetto Oncologia Femminile publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol – volume: 152 start-page: 1423 year: 1995 end-page: 1433 article-title: Effective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: a review publication-title: CMAJ – volume: 45 start-page: 941 year: 1992 end-page: 950 article-title: Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol – volume: 347 start-page: 1233 year: 2002 end-page: 1241 article-title: Twenty‐year follow‐up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 48 start-page: 185 year: 2005 end-page: 194 article-title: Surgical management of early stage invasive breast cancer: a practice guideline publication-title: Can J Surg – volume: 17 start-page: 298 year: 1997 end-page: 306 article-title: Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life publication-title: Med Decis Making – volume: 53 start-page: 669 year: 2001 end-page: 677 article-title: Taking responsibility for cancer treatment publication-title: Soc Sci Med – volume: 16 start-page: 284 year: 1997 end-page: 298 article-title: Psychosocial outcomes of breast‐conserving surgery mastectomy: a meta‐analytic review publication-title: Health Psychol – volume: 277 start-page: 1485 year: 1997 end-page: 1492 article-title: Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer publication-title: JAMA – volume: 15 start-page: 7 year: 2007 end-page: 20 article-title: Interactive technologies and videotapes for patient education in cancer care: systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised trials publication-title: Support Care Cancer – volume: 25 start-page: 417 year: 2002 end-page: 424 article-title: Feasibility of using a computer‐assisted intervention to enhance the way women with breast cancer communicate with their physicians publication-title: Cancer Nurs – volume: 4 start-page: 103 year: 1998 end-page: 116 article-title: Patient participation in treatment decision making and the psychological consequences of breast cancer surgery publication-title: Womens Health – volume: 35 start-page: 836 year: 2001 end-page: 847 article-title: Factors influencing women's decisions for choice of surgery for stage I and stage II breast cancer in Western Australia publication-title: J Adv Nurs – volume: 347 start-page: 1227 year: 2002 end-page: 1232 article-title: Twenty‐year follow‐up of a randomized study comparing breast‐conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 19 start-page: 8 year: 1996 end-page: 19 article-title: Treatment decision making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer publication-title: Cancer Nurs – volume: 90 start-page: 82 year: 2003 end-page: 87 article-title: The National Health Service Breast Screening Programme and British Association of Surgical Oncology audit of quality assurance in breast screening 1996–2001 publication-title: Br J Surg – volume: 42 start-page: 39 year: 1992 end-page: 43 article-title: Regional differences in surgical management of breast cancer publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin – volume: 292 start-page: 435 year: 2004 end-page: 441 article-title: Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial publication-title: JAMA – volume: 15 start-page: 9 year: 2006 end-page: 19 article-title: Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow‐up of women with breast cancer publication-title: Psychooncology – volume: 150 start-page: 345 year: 1994 end-page: 352 article-title: Variation in breast cancer surgery in Ontario publication-title: CMAJ – volume: 67 start-page: 750 year: 1997 end-page: 754 article-title: Quality of life after breast conservation or mastectomy: a systematic review publication-title: Aust N Z J Surg – volume: 22 start-page: 3091 year: 2004 end-page: 3098 article-title: Patient–physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision publication-title: J Clin Oncol – volume: 39 start-page: 467 year: 2000 end-page: 476 article-title: Information needs and preferences for participation in treatment decisions among Swedish breast cancer patients publication-title: Acta Oncol – volume: 252 start-page: 2990 year: 1984 end-page: 2994 article-title: Do patients want to participate in medical decision making? publication-title: JAMA – issue: 2 year: 2003 article-title: Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 92 start-page: 1143 year: 2000 end-page: 1150 article-title: Long‐term results of a randomized trial comparing breast‐conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst – volume: 3 start-page: 202 year: 1994 end-page: 208 article-title: A question of choice: results of a prospective 3‐year follow‐up study of women with breast cancer publication-title: The Breast – volume: 3 start-page: 169 year: 1996 end-page: 175 article-title: Clinicopathologic factors and patient perceptions associated with surgical breast‐conserving treatment publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol |
| SSID | ssj0013052 |
| Score | 2.1062717 |
| Snippet | Background:
Previous studies have indicated a predominance of passive decision‐making styles among women with early‐stage breast cancer in the UK offered a... Previous studies have indicated a predominance of passive decision-making styles among women with early-stage breast cancer in the UK offered a choice between... Women may not always choose breast conservation |
| SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed pascalfrancis wiley istex |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 312 |
| SubjectTerms | Adult Age Factors Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Breast Neoplasms - pathology Breast Neoplasms - psychology Breast Neoplasms - surgery Decision Making Female General aspects Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Mammary gland diseases Mastectomy - psychology Medical sciences Middle Aged Original Patient Participation Patient Satisfaction Tumors |
| Title | Changing trends in the decision-making preferences of women with early breast cancer |
| URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-V5FB0C02-Z/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fbjs.5964 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17853508 https://www.proquest.com/docview/70314191 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11440001 |
| Volume | 95 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LbtQwFLVQV2woFdBOaYsXiF2mTmLHzrItDFUlugD6ULuw_IjVh8hUk4yEWPEJfCNfwr3OTIZpu0BkE0WxI9nHjo_t43MJecuFManPfAJDr0h4wXhiSwOPhRNFbqVXDA84fzouDk_40bk4n6kq8SxM5w_RL7hhz4j_a-zgxja7C9NQe9MMRVmgFWiaS1Rzvf-cLTYQmOiMwtEDMc_yue8sy3bnGYGOYk1-RzmkaaBGQhfK4jGu-VAy-TeVjWPRaJVczkvRSVBuh9PWDt2PewaP_1fM5-TZjKLSva5NrZEnVf2CnMZjCDDO0TaqaOl1TYE7Uj-L0fP7569vMbAVvesjlzR0HGi0eKC43EsrNFOmFmXwLXXY3CYvycnow9eDw2QWkyFxHK6k5L4yuXI-N4AiVwApjHHG40RXskp5VTpnFa9KF0zBQyGlsDyoNC1UCWwtf0VW6nFdbRAaXC5FAMrjvAKeIJVT3rrgTMgCC4INyLuIj77rfDe0mdyiDE0KfXb8UZ-K0T47YJm-GJCdJQD7DBnuG6ZMDcibOaIaeg9uiZi6Gk8bHd37Yco6IOsdvn3eVAKREZhXLSHfJ0Bf7uU39fVV9OdOccMc2iAUICK7-Ga0iM40YKoRU71_9AXvm_-a8DV52ulVUAO3RVbaybTaBlLU2p3Y_P8A9J0Lsg |
| link.rule.ids | 230,315,783,787,888,1378,27937,27938,46307,46731 |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB6VcoALD_FaHq0PiFu2TmInjjjRwrKUdg_QlgohWY4di1KRrXazEuLET-A38kuYcTZZFjggcomi2JHszxN_9oy_AXgspDGxS1yEU6-MRMZFVBYGHzMrs7TMneJ0wPlwko2Pxf6pPN2Ap91ZmFYfot9wI8sI_2sycNqQ3lmphpaf5kNZZOISXEZrT8kqn79JVi4ELlupcFJBTJO0U57lyU5XEwkp9eUXCog0c-wT3yaz-Bvb_DNo8lcyG2aj0XX40LWjDUI5Hy6acmi__ibx-J8NvQHXliyVPWuH1U3YqOpbcBJOIuBUx5oQSMvOaob0kbllmp4f375_Drmt2EWfvGTOpp4FlQdGO76sIj1lVlIkfMMsjbjZbTgevTjaG0fLtAyRFXhFhXCVSZV1qUEghUJUcZozjta6Oa-UU4W1pRJVYb3JhM_yXJbCqzjOVIGELb0Dm_W0ru4B8zbNpUfWY51CqpArq1xpvTU-8dxLPoAnASB90UpvaDM7p0i0XOp3k5f6RI52-R5P9PsBbK0h2FdIyHUYczWA7Q5SjQZEXhFTV9PFXAcBf1y1DuBuC3BfN86Ry0iqq9ag7wuQNPf6m_rsY5DojslnjoMQGxCgXX0zqEQnGjHVhKne3X9L9_v_WnAbroyPDg_0wavJ6wdwtQ1foZC4h7DZzBbVI-RITbkVbOEnhxkPyw |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LbtQwFLVKKyE2hYrX8Gi9QOwydRLbcZa0ZVoKjBDQUsHC8iMWbUVmNJORECs-gW_sl3CvM5NhgAUimyiKHck-dnxsH59LyBMujEl95hMYekXCJeOJLQ08SidkbguvGB5wfj2URyf8-EyczVWVeBam9YfoFtywZ8T_NXbwsQ-7S9NQezHti1Lya2SDS2ipSIjeZssdBCZap3A0QcyzfGE8y7LdRU7go1iVX1EPaaZQJaGNZfE3svmnZvJXLhsHo8FN8mlRjFaDctmfNbbvvv3m8Ph_5bxFNucclT5rG9UWWavq2-Q0nkOAgY42UUZLz2sK5JH6eZCeq-8_vsTIVnTchS6Z0lGg0eOB4novrdBNmVrUwTfUYXub3CEng-fv94-SeVCGxHG4kpL7yuTK-dwAjFwBpjDIGY8z3YJVyqvSOat4VbpgJA-yKITlQaWpVCXQtfwuWa9HdXWf0ODyQgTgPM4rIAqFcspbF5wJWWBBsB55GvHR49Z4Q5vJJerQCqE_DA_1qRjssX2W6Y89sr0CYJchw43DlKke2VkgqqH74J6IqavRbKqjfT_MWXvkXotvlzctgMkIzKtWkO8SoDH36pv6_HM06E5xxxzaIBQgIrv8ZvSIzjRgqhFTvXf8Du8P_jXhDrn-5mCgX70YvnxIbrTaFdTDPSLrzWRWPQaC1Njt2BN-Al68Dno |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changing+trends+in+the+decision-making+preferences+of+women+with+early+breast+cancer&rft.jtitle=British+journal+of+surgery&rft.au=Caldon%2C+L+J+M&rft.au=Walters%2C+S+J&rft.au=Reed%2C+M+W+R&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.issn=1365-2168&rft.eissn=1365-2168&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=312&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fbjs.5964&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0007-1323&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0007-1323&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0007-1323&client=summon |