The Role of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex in Spatial Margin of Safety Calculations

Naturalistic observations show that animals pre-empt danger by moving to locations that increase their success in avoiding future threats. To test this in humans, we created a spatial margin of safety (MOS) decision task that quantifies pre-emptive avoidance by measuring the distance subjects place...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of neuroscience Vol. 44; no. 34; p. e1162222024
Main Authors Qi, Song, Cross, Logan, Wise, Toby, Sui, Xin, O’Doherty, John, Mobbs, Dean
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Society for Neuroscience 21.08.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Naturalistic observations show that animals pre-empt danger by moving to locations that increase their success in avoiding future threats. To test this in humans, we created a spatial margin of safety (MOS) decision task that quantifies pre-emptive avoidance by measuring the distance subjects place themselves to safety when facing different threats whose attack locations vary in predictability. Behavioral results show that human participants place themselves closer to safe locations when facing threats that attack in spatial locations with more outliers. Using both univariate and multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) on fMRI data collected during a 2 h session on participants of both sexes, we demonstrate a dissociable role for the vmPFC in MOS-related decision-making. MVPA results revealed that the posterior vmPFC encoded for more unpredictable threats with univariate analyses showing a functional coupling with the amygdala and hippocampus. Conversely, the anterior vmPFC was more active for the more predictable attacks and showed coupling with the striatum. Our findings converge in showing that during pre-emptive danger, the anterior vmPFC may provide a safety signal, possibly via foreseeable outcomes, while the posterior vmPFC drives unpredictable danger signals.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Author contributions: S.Q. and D.M. designed research; S.Q. and X.S. performed research; S.Q. analyzed data; S.Q., L.C., T.W., J.O., and D.M. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no competing financial interests. D.M. is supported by an award NIMH R01MH133730.
ISSN:0270-6474
1529-2401
1529-2401
DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1162-22.2024