The effects of self-consciousness and self-esteem on conformity to a majority
Ninety-five Japanese students made judgments of line lengths under different levels of conformity pressure in the Asch/Crutchfield paradigm. Comformity pressure level (whether the preceding four or two ‘others’ unanimously picked a wrong choice) and public self-consciousness interacted; under high p...
Saved in:
Published in | Shinrigaku kenkyū Vol. 63; no. 6; pp. 379 - 387 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Japanese |
Published |
Japan
The Japanese Psychological Association
01.02.1993
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0021-5236 1884-1082 |
DOI | 10.4992/jjpsy.63.379 |
Cover
Summary: | Ninety-five Japanese students made judgments of line lengths under different levels of conformity pressure in the Asch/Crutchfield paradigm. Comformity pressure level (whether the preceding four or two ‘others’ unanimously picked a wrong choice) and public self-consciousness interacted; under high pressure, the higher the public self-consciousness, the more conforming responses. Independently, under high pressure, higher self-esteem led to fewer conforming responses. Under low pressure, neither public self-consciousness nor self-esteem had a significant effect. None of the following affected conformity: gender, private self-consciousness, or social self-esteem. In addition, anti-conformity (picking a wrong choice in the control trials where the ‘others’ chose the correct one) was observed, replicating the findings first reported by Frager (1970). A gender by social self-esteem by block (first vs. second half of experimental task) interaction, a gender by self-esteem by block interaction, and a gender by public self-consciousness interaction separately affected the number of anti-conformity responses. Implications for self-consciousness theories are discussed. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0021-5236 1884-1082 |
DOI: | 10.4992/jjpsy.63.379 |