Antibodies against biotin‐labeled red blood cells can shorten posttransfusion survival
Background In hematologic and transfusion medicine research, measurement of red blood cell (RBC) in vivo kinetics must be safe and accurate. Recent reports indicate use of biotin‐labeled RBC (BioRBC) to determine red cell survival (RCS) offers substantial advantages over 51Cr and other labeling meth...
Saved in:
Published in | Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Vol. 62; no. 4; pp. 770 - 782 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken, USA
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.04.2022
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
In hematologic and transfusion medicine research, measurement of red blood cell (RBC) in vivo kinetics must be safe and accurate. Recent reports indicate use of biotin‐labeled RBC (BioRBC) to determine red cell survival (RCS) offers substantial advantages over 51Cr and other labeling methods. Occasional induction of BioRBC antibodies has been reported.
Study Design and Methods
To investigate the causes and consequences of BioRBC immunization, we reexposed three previously immunized adults to BioRBC and evaluated the safety, antibody emergence, and RCS of BioRBC.
Results
BioRBC re‐exposure caused an anamnestic increase of plasma BioRBC antibodies at 5–7 days; all were subclass IgG1 and neutralized by biotinylated albumin, thus indicating structural specificity for the biotin epitope. Concurrently, specific antibody binding to BioRBC was observed in each subject. As biotin label density increased, the proportion of BioRBC that bound increased antibody also increased; the latter was associated with proportional accelerated removal of BioRBC labeled at density 6 μg/mL. In contrast, only one of three subjects exhibited accelerated removal of BioRBC density 2 μg/mL. No adverse clinical or laboratory events were observed. Among three control subjects who did not develop BioRBC antibodies following initial BioRBC exposure, re‐exposure induced neither antibody emergence nor accelerated BioRBC removal.
Discussion
We conclude re‐exposure of immunized subjects to BioRBC can induce anamnestic antibody response that can cause an underestimation of RCS. To minimize chances of antibody induction and underestimation of RCS, we recommend an initial BioRBC exposure volume of ≤10 mL and label densities of ≤18 μg/mL. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information The sponsors of this work had no role in this work including: study design; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; the writing of the report; and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The sponsors of this work include: The United States Public Health Service National Institutes of Health Grants P01 HL046925 and R01 DK063088 (RSF); The Thrasher Research Fund 0285‐3; The National Center for Research Resources, a part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) CTSA Grants U54TR001356 (U Iowa), UL1TR000039/U54TR001629/UL1TR003107 (UAMS Translational Research Institute), and 1S10 RR027219, and UL1 TR001425 (University of Cincinnati). Some of the flow cytometry data were obtained at the Flow Cytometry Facility, which is a core research facility at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; support was also provided by the NHLBI Summer Undergraduate Research Program to Increase Diversity in Research (SURP grant) R25 HL108825 (UAMS). Some of the flow cytometry data were obtained at the Flow Cytometry Facility, which is a Carver College of Medicine/Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center core research facility at the University of Iowa. The facility is funded through user fees and the generous financial support of the Carver College of Medicine, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Iowa City Veteran's Administration Medical Center. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0041-1132 1537-2995 1537-2995 |
DOI: | 10.1111/trf.16849 |