Improving the efficacy and reliability of rTMS language mapping by increasing the stimulation frequency

Repetitive TMS (rTMS) with a frequency of 5–10 Hz is widely used for language mapping. However, it may be accompanied by discomfort and is limited in the number and reliability of evoked language errors. We, here, systematically tested the influence of different stimulation frequencies (i.e., 10, 30...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman brain mapping Vol. 42; no. 16; pp. 5309 - 5321
Main Authors Nettekoven, Charlotte, Pieczewski, Julia, Neuschmelting, Volker, Jonas, Kristina, Goldbrunner, Roland, Grefkes, Christian, Weiss Lucas, Carolin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.11.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1065-9471
1097-0193
1097-0193
DOI10.1002/hbm.25619

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Repetitive TMS (rTMS) with a frequency of 5–10 Hz is widely used for language mapping. However, it may be accompanied by discomfort and is limited in the number and reliability of evoked language errors. We, here, systematically tested the influence of different stimulation frequencies (i.e., 10, 30, and 50 Hz) on tolerability, number, reliability, and cortical distribution of language errors aiming at improved language mapping. 15 right‐handed, healthy subjects (m = 8, median age: 29 yrs) were investigated in two sessions, separated by 2–5 days. In each session, 10, 30, and 50 Hz rTMS were applied over the left hemisphere in a randomized order during a picture naming task. Overall, 30 Hz rTMS evoked significantly more errors (20 ± 12%) compared to 50 Hz (12 ± 8%; p <.01), whereas error rates were comparable between 30/50 and 10 Hz (18 ± 11%). Across all conditions, a significantly higher error rate was found in Session 1 (19 ± 13%) compared to Session 2 (13 ± 7%, p <.05). The error rate was poorly reliable between sessions for 10 (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = .315) and 30 Hz (ICC = .427), whereas 50 Hz showed a moderate reliability (ICC = .597). Spatial reliability of language errors was low to moderate with a tendency toward increased reliability for higher frequencies, for example, within frontal regions. Compared to 10 Hz, both, 30 and 50 Hz were rated as less painful. Taken together, our data favor the use of rTMS‐protocols employing higher frequencies for evoking language errors reliably and with reduced discomfort, depending on the region of interest. The use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for language mapping is still hampered by a limited sensitivity and specificity, by an overall poor reliability and by stimulation‐associated discomfort. We, here, found that increasing the stimulation intensity up to 30 and 50 Hz can improve language mapping results as compared to the most commonly used protocol of 10 Hz rTMS.
AbstractList Repetitive TMS (rTMS) with a frequency of 5–10 Hz is widely used for language mapping. However, it may be accompanied by discomfort and is limited in the number and reliability of evoked language errors. We, here, systematically tested the influence of different stimulation frequencies (i.e., 10, 30, and 50 Hz) on tolerability, number, reliability, and cortical distribution of language errors aiming at improved language mapping. 15 right‐handed, healthy subjects (m = 8, median age: 29 yrs) were investigated in two sessions, separated by 2–5 days. In each session, 10, 30, and 50 Hz rTMS were applied over the left hemisphere in a randomized order during a picture naming task. Overall, 30 Hz rTMS evoked significantly more errors (20 ± 12%) compared to 50 Hz (12 ± 8%; p <.01), whereas error rates were comparable between 30/50 and 10 Hz (18 ± 11%). Across all conditions, a significantly higher error rate was found in Session 1 (19 ± 13%) compared to Session 2 (13 ± 7%, p <.05). The error rate was poorly reliable between sessions for 10 (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = .315) and 30 Hz (ICC = .427), whereas 50 Hz showed a moderate reliability (ICC = .597). Spatial reliability of language errors was low to moderate with a tendency toward increased reliability for higher frequencies, for example, within frontal regions. Compared to 10 Hz, both, 30 and 50 Hz were rated as less painful. Taken together, our data favor the use of rTMS‐protocols employing higher frequencies for evoking language errors reliably and with reduced discomfort, depending on the region of interest. The use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for language mapping is still hampered by a limited sensitivity and specificity, by an overall poor reliability and by stimulation‐associated discomfort. We, here, found that increasing the stimulation intensity up to 30 and 50 Hz can improve language mapping results as compared to the most commonly used protocol of 10 Hz rTMS.
Repetitive TMS (rTMS) with a frequency of 5–10 Hz is widely used for language mapping. However, it may be accompanied by discomfort and is limited in the number and reliability of evoked language errors. We, here, systematically tested the influence of different stimulation frequencies (i.e., 10, 30, and 50 Hz) on tolerability, number, reliability, and cortical distribution of language errors aiming at improved language mapping. 15 right‐handed, healthy subjects (m = 8, median age: 29 yrs) were investigated in two sessions, separated by 2–5 days. In each session, 10, 30, and 50 Hz rTMS were applied over the left hemisphere in a randomized order during a picture naming task. Overall, 30 Hz rTMS evoked significantly more errors (20 ± 12%) compared to 50 Hz (12 ± 8%; p <.01), whereas error rates were comparable between 30/50 and 10 Hz (18 ± 11%). Across all conditions, a significantly higher error rate was found in Session 1 (19 ± 13%) compared to Session 2 (13 ± 7%, p <.05). The error rate was poorly reliable between sessions for 10 (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = .315) and 30 Hz (ICC = .427), whereas 50 Hz showed a moderate reliability (ICC = .597). Spatial reliability of language errors was low to moderate with a tendency toward increased reliability for higher frequencies, for example, within frontal regions. Compared to 10 Hz, both, 30 and 50 Hz were rated as less painful. Taken together, our data favor the use of rTMS‐protocols employing higher frequencies for evoking language errors reliably and with reduced discomfort, depending on the region of interest.
Repetitive TMS (rTMS) with a frequency of 5–10 Hz is widely used for language mapping. However, it may be accompanied by discomfort and is limited in the number and reliability of evoked language errors. We, here, systematically tested the influence of different stimulation frequencies (i.e., 10, 30, and 50 Hz) on tolerability, number, reliability, and cortical distribution of language errors aiming at improved language mapping. 15 right‐handed, healthy subjects (m = 8, median age: 29 yrs) were investigated in two sessions, separated by 2–5 days. In each session, 10, 30, and 50 Hz rTMS were applied over the left hemisphere in a randomized order during a picture naming task. Overall, 30 Hz rTMS evoked significantly more errors (20 ± 12%) compared to 50 Hz (12 ± 8%; p <.01), whereas error rates were comparable between 30/50 and 10 Hz (18 ± 11%). Across all conditions, a significantly higher error rate was found in Session 1 (19 ± 13%) compared to Session 2 (13 ± 7%, p <.05). The error rate was poorly reliable between sessions for 10 (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = .315) and 30 Hz (ICC = .427), whereas 50 Hz showed a moderate reliability (ICC = .597). Spatial reliability of language errors was low to moderate with a tendency toward increased reliability for higher frequencies, for example, within frontal regions. Compared to 10 Hz, both, 30 and 50 Hz were rated as less painful. Taken together, our data favor the use of rTMS‐protocols employing higher frequencies for evoking language errors reliably and with reduced discomfort, depending on the region of interest.
Repetitive TMS (rTMS) with a frequency of 5–10 Hz is widely used for language mapping. However, it may be accompanied by discomfort and is limited in the number and reliability of evoked language errors. We, here, systematically tested the influence of different stimulation frequencies (i.e., 10, 30, and 50 Hz) on tolerability, number, reliability, and cortical distribution of language errors aiming at improved language mapping. 15 right‐handed, healthy subjects (m = 8, median age: 29 yrs) were investigated in two sessions, separated by 2–5 days. In each session, 10, 30, and 50 Hz rTMS were applied over the left hemisphere in a randomized order during a picture naming task. Overall, 30 Hz rTMS evoked significantly more errors (20 ± 12%) compared to 50 Hz (12 ± 8%; p <.01), whereas error rates were comparable between 30/50 and 10 Hz (18 ± 11%). Across all conditions, a significantly higher error rate was found in Session 1 (19 ± 13%) compared to Session 2 (13 ± 7%, p <.05). The error rate was poorly reliable between sessions for 10 (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = .315) and 30 Hz (ICC = .427), whereas 50 Hz showed a moderate reliability (ICC = .597). Spatial reliability of language errors was low to moderate with a tendency toward increased reliability for higher frequencies, for example, within frontal regions. Compared to 10 Hz, both, 30 and 50 Hz were rated as less painful. Taken together, our data favor the use of rTMS‐protocols employing higher frequencies for evoking language errors reliably and with reduced discomfort, depending on the region of interest. The use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for language mapping is still hampered by a limited sensitivity and specificity, by an overall poor reliability and by stimulation‐associated discomfort. We, here, found that increasing the stimulation intensity up to 30 and 50 Hz can improve language mapping results as compared to the most commonly used protocol of 10 Hz rTMS.
Repetitive TMS (rTMS) with a frequency of 5-10 Hz is widely used for language mapping. However, it may be accompanied by discomfort and is limited in the number and reliability of evoked language errors. We, here, systematically tested the influence of different stimulation frequencies (i.e., 10, 30, and 50 Hz) on tolerability, number, reliability, and cortical distribution of language errors aiming at improved language mapping. 15 right-handed, healthy subjects (m = 8, median age: 29 yrs) were investigated in two sessions, separated by 2-5 days. In each session, 10, 30, and 50 Hz rTMS were applied over the left hemisphere in a randomized order during a picture naming task. Overall, 30 Hz rTMS evoked significantly more errors (20 ± 12%) compared to 50 Hz (12 ± 8%; p <.01), whereas error rates were comparable between 30/50 and 10 Hz (18 ± 11%). Across all conditions, a significantly higher error rate was found in Session 1 (19 ± 13%) compared to Session 2 (13 ± 7%, p <.05). The error rate was poorly reliable between sessions for 10 (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = .315) and 30 Hz (ICC = .427), whereas 50 Hz showed a moderate reliability (ICC = .597). Spatial reliability of language errors was low to moderate with a tendency toward increased reliability for higher frequencies, for example, within frontal regions. Compared to 10 Hz, both, 30 and 50 Hz were rated as less painful. Taken together, our data favor the use of rTMS-protocols employing higher frequencies for evoking language errors reliably and with reduced discomfort, depending on the region of interest.
Repetitive TMS (rTMS) with a frequency of 5-10 Hz is widely used for language mapping. However, it may be accompanied by discomfort and is limited in the number and reliability of evoked language errors. We, here, systematically tested the influence of different stimulation frequencies (i.e., 10, 30, and 50 Hz) on tolerability, number, reliability, and cortical distribution of language errors aiming at improved language mapping. 15 right-handed, healthy subjects (m = 8, median age: 29 yrs) were investigated in two sessions, separated by 2-5 days. In each session, 10, 30, and 50 Hz rTMS were applied over the left hemisphere in a randomized order during a picture naming task. Overall, 30 Hz rTMS evoked significantly more errors (20 ± 12%) compared to 50 Hz (12 ± 8%; p <.01), whereas error rates were comparable between 30/50 and 10 Hz (18 ± 11%). Across all conditions, a significantly higher error rate was found in Session 1 (19 ± 13%) compared to Session 2 (13 ± 7%, p <.05). The error rate was poorly reliable between sessions for 10 (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = .315) and 30 Hz (ICC = .427), whereas 50 Hz showed a moderate reliability (ICC = .597). Spatial reliability of language errors was low to moderate with a tendency toward increased reliability for higher frequencies, for example, within frontal regions. Compared to 10 Hz, both, 30 and 50 Hz were rated as less painful. Taken together, our data favor the use of rTMS-protocols employing higher frequencies for evoking language errors reliably and with reduced discomfort, depending on the region of interest.Repetitive TMS (rTMS) with a frequency of 5-10 Hz is widely used for language mapping. However, it may be accompanied by discomfort and is limited in the number and reliability of evoked language errors. We, here, systematically tested the influence of different stimulation frequencies (i.e., 10, 30, and 50 Hz) on tolerability, number, reliability, and cortical distribution of language errors aiming at improved language mapping. 15 right-handed, healthy subjects (m = 8, median age: 29 yrs) were investigated in two sessions, separated by 2-5 days. In each session, 10, 30, and 50 Hz rTMS were applied over the left hemisphere in a randomized order during a picture naming task. Overall, 30 Hz rTMS evoked significantly more errors (20 ± 12%) compared to 50 Hz (12 ± 8%; p <.01), whereas error rates were comparable between 30/50 and 10 Hz (18 ± 11%). Across all conditions, a significantly higher error rate was found in Session 1 (19 ± 13%) compared to Session 2 (13 ± 7%, p <.05). The error rate was poorly reliable between sessions for 10 (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = .315) and 30 Hz (ICC = .427), whereas 50 Hz showed a moderate reliability (ICC = .597). Spatial reliability of language errors was low to moderate with a tendency toward increased reliability for higher frequencies, for example, within frontal regions. Compared to 10 Hz, both, 30 and 50 Hz were rated as less painful. Taken together, our data favor the use of rTMS-protocols employing higher frequencies for evoking language errors reliably and with reduced discomfort, depending on the region of interest.
Author Neuschmelting, Volker
Goldbrunner, Roland
Nettekoven, Charlotte
Weiss Lucas, Carolin
Pieczewski, Julia
Jonas, Kristina
Grefkes, Christian
AuthorAffiliation 1 Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery University of Cologne Cologne Germany
2 Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation and Special Education University of Cologne Cologne Germany
3 Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Department of Neurology University of Cologne Cologne Germany
4 Juelich Research Centre Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM‐3) Juelich Germany
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation and Special Education University of Cologne Cologne Germany
– name: 3 Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Department of Neurology University of Cologne Cologne Germany
– name: 1 Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery University of Cologne Cologne Germany
– name: 4 Juelich Research Centre Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM‐3) Juelich Germany
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Charlotte
  surname: Nettekoven
  fullname: Nettekoven, Charlotte
  organization: University of Cologne
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Julia
  surname: Pieczewski
  fullname: Pieczewski, Julia
  organization: University of Cologne
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Volker
  surname: Neuschmelting
  fullname: Neuschmelting, Volker
  organization: University of Cologne
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Kristina
  surname: Jonas
  fullname: Jonas, Kristina
  organization: University of Cologne
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Roland
  surname: Goldbrunner
  fullname: Goldbrunner, Roland
  organization: University of Cologne
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Christian
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1656-720X
  surname: Grefkes
  fullname: Grefkes, Christian
  organization: Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM‐3)
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Carolin
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6463-0034
  surname: Weiss Lucas
  fullname: Weiss Lucas, Carolin
  email: carolin.weiss@uk-koeln.de
  organization: University of Cologne
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34387388$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kctO3jAQha0KVC7toi9QWeqGLgJ2Lo69qdQiWpBAXZSuLccZ5zdK7NROQHl7HH5ABald2dJ858yZmQO047wDhD5QckwJyU82zXCcV4yKN2ifElFnhIpiZ_2zKhNlTffQQYw3hFBaEfoW7RVlweuC833UXQxj8LfWdXjaAAZjrFZ6wcq1OEBvVWN7Oy3YGxyur37hXrluVh3gQY3jqmoWbJ0OoOKTR5zsMPdqst5hE-DPDE4v79CuUX2E94_vIfr9_ez69Dy7_Pnj4vTrZabLshAZLaFhpFAEaMMKUeumbVtKBect55pSVSomSm4Ko5hJdaE4QEXrlhWsapLFIfqy9R3nZoBWg5uC6uUY7KDCIr2y8mXF2Y3s_K3kVepSrwZHjwbBp-hxkoONGvo0OPg5ynXPJac1rxL66RV64-fg0niJ4nlekypnifr4d6LnKE83SMDnLaCDjzGAeUYoket9ZbrvQ1-R2JNXrLbTw6rTMLb_n-LO9rD821qef7vaKu4B0HG3mg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_1008442
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci11111471
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eplepsyres_2023_107183
crossref_primary_10_1111_psyp_14312
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2022_1027446
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2024_1481430
Cites_doi 10.1186/s12868-015-0143-9
10.3171/2014.9.JNS14929
10.1186/s40001-015-0138-0
10.1002/hbm.20063
10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00197
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.050
10.1016/j.brs.2019.10.001
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.11.003
10.3171/jns.1989.71.3.0316
10.1055/s-0039-1691821
10.2217/cns.14.25
10.1097/01.yct.0000244248.40662.9a
10.1371/journal.pone.0125298
10.1007/s00429-016-1298-6
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.016
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.046
10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
10.3171/2014.10.JNS141582
10.1073/pnas.1614038114
10.1186/s12868-016-0305-4
10.1002/hbm.25101
10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.028
10.3171/2013.11.JNS13952
10.1038/nrn2113
10.1093/brain/awq283
10.1093/brain/awp233
10.1007/s00701-017-3187-z
10.1007/s10548-019-00698-9
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.05.015
10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000775
10.1212/WNL.41.5.697
10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820b528c
10.3171/2009.7.JNS09239
10.1007/s00701-017-3397-4
10.1186/1471-2202-14-150
10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182889e01
10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016
10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00096-8
10.1016/0166-2236(92)90341-5
10.1007/s00429-015-1042-7
10.1097/00004691-199807000-00004
10.3390/jcm10040655
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.018
10.1007/s11682-018-9921-1
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.009
10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.043
10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.042
10.1016/j.bandl.2010.04.001
10.1152/jn.00467.2013
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
2021 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
– notice: 2021 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
– notice: 2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID 24P
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7QR
7TK
7U7
8FD
C1K
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1002/hbm.25619
DatabaseName Wiley Online Library Open Access
CrossRef
PubMed
Chemoreception Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Toxicology Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Technology Research Database
Toxicology Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Chemoreception Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Neurosciences Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
Technology Research Database
CrossRef

PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 24P
  name: Wiley Online Library Open Access
  url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Anatomy & Physiology
DocumentTitleAlternate Nettekoven et al
EISSN 1097-0193
EndPage 5321
ExternalDocumentID PMC8519874
34387388
10_1002_hbm_25619
HBM25619
Genre article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  funderid: INST 1850/50‐1
– fundername: Universität zu Köln
  funderid: Gerok 8/2016
– fundername: ;
  grantid: INST 1850/50‐1
– fundername: ;
  grantid: Gerok 8/2016
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1L6
1OB
1OC
1ZS
24P
31~
33P
3SF
3WU
4.4
4ZD
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5VS
66C
702
7PT
7X7
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8FI
8FJ
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AANHP
AAONW
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABIJN
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABUWG
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCMX
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADPDF
ADXAS
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AFBPY
AFGKR
AFKRA
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFZJQ
AHMBA
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJXKR
ALAGY
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
ASPBG
ATUGU
AUFTA
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BENPR
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CCPQU
CS3
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR1
DR2
DU5
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FYUFA
G-S
G.N
GAKWD
GNP
GODZA
GROUPED_DOAJ
H.T
H.X
HBH
HF~
HHY
HHZ
HMCUK
HVGLF
HZ~
IAO
IHR
ITC
IX1
J0M
JPC
KQQ
L7B
LAW
LC2
LC3
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
M6M
MK4
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NNB
O66
O9-
OIG
OK1
OVD
OVEED
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
PALCI
PIMPY
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QRW
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RPM
RWD
RWI
RX1
RYL
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
UB1
UKHRP
V2E
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WIB
WIH
WIK
WIN
WJL
WNSPC
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WUP
WXSBR
WYISQ
XG1
XSW
XV2
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAFWJ
AAYXX
AFPKN
AGQPQ
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
NPM
7QR
7TK
7U7
8FD
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
C1K
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
PUEGO
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-14eb603a0e1b6397cbddd11988d88c11a4a6948f3fa6f3979a8ee517d6365b443
IEDL.DBID 24P
ISSN 1065-9471
1097-0193
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:29:55 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 22:37:02 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 26 02:26:26 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:02:42 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:11:04 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:12:46 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:29:10 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 16
Keywords brain stimulation
pain
noninvasive
error rate
tolerability
virtual lesion
speech mapping
TMS
picture naming
Language English
License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
2021 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4439-14eb603a0e1b6397cbddd11988d88c11a4a6948f3fa6f3979a8ee517d6365b443
Notes Funding information
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Grant/Award Number: INST 1850/50‐1; Universität zu Köln, Grant/Award Number: Gerok 8/2016
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Funding information Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Grant/Award Number: INST 1850/50‐1; Universität zu Köln, Grant/Award Number: Gerok 8/2016
ORCID 0000-0001-6463-0034
0000-0002-1656-720X
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fhbm.25619
PMID 34387388
PQID 2582270526
PQPubID 996345
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8519874
proquest_miscellaneous_2561481785
proquest_journals_2582270526
pubmed_primary_34387388
crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_25619
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_hbm_25619
wiley_primary_10_1002_hbm_25619_HBM25619
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate November 2021
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2021
  text: November 2021
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Hoboken, USA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Hoboken, USA
– name: United States
– name: San Antonio
PublicationTitle Human brain mapping
PublicationTitleAlternate Hum Brain Mapp
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
References 2018; 160
2013; 66
2019; 13
2004; 23
2016; 221
2020; 13
1992; 15
2016a; 127
2012; 204
2017; 158
2017; 159
2005; 24
1998; 15
1989; 71
2018; 176
2013; 14
2014; 3
2000
2006; 22
2015a; 123
1991; 41
2010; 115
2010; 112
2015; 253
2016; 113
2007; 8
2016b; 127
2011; 68
2009; 120
2014; 8
2014; 120
2019; 32
1995; 57
2020; 81
2016; 17
2011; 134
2015a; 16
2013; 77
2015; 113
2021
2015; 20
2013; 72
1998; 108
2010; 133
2013; 82
2015b; 123
2018; 12
2017; 222
2014; 100
2015b; 10
41
e_1_2_11_32_1
e_1_2_11_30_1
e_1_2_11_36_1
e_1_2_11_51_1
e_1_2_11_13_1
e_1_2_11_34_1
e_1_2_11_11_1
e_1_2_11_29_1
e_1_2_11_6_1
e_1_2_11_27_1
e_1_2_11_4_1
e_1_2_11_48_1
e_1_2_11_2_1
Teo W. P. (e_1_2_11_47_1) 2014; 8
e_1_2_11_20_1
e_1_2_11_45_1
e_1_2_11_24_1
e_1_2_11_41_1
e_1_2_11_8_1
e_1_2_11_22_1
e_1_2_11_43_1
e_1_2_11_17_1
e_1_2_11_15_1
e_1_2_11_38_1
e_1_2_11_19_1
e_1_2_11_50_1
e_1_2_11_10_1
e_1_2_11_31_1
e_1_2_11_14_1
e_1_2_11_35_1
e_1_2_11_52_1
e_1_2_11_12_1
e_1_2_11_7_1
e_1_2_11_28_1
e_1_2_11_5_1
e_1_2_11_26_1
e_1_2_11_3_1
e_1_2_11_49_1
Portney L. G. (e_1_2_11_33_1) 2000
e_1_2_11_21_1
e_1_2_11_44_1
e_1_2_11_46_1
e_1_2_11_25_1
e_1_2_11_40_1
e_1_2_11_9_1
e_1_2_11_23_1
e_1_2_11_42_1
e_1_2_11_18_1
e_1_2_11_16_1
e_1_2_11_37_1
e_1_2_11_39_1
References_xml – volume: 113
  start-page: 3663
  year: 2015
  end-page: 3682
  article-title: Brain oscillatory signatures of motor tasks
  publication-title: Journal of Neurophysiology
– volume: 113
  start-page: 15108
  year: 2016
  end-page: 15113
  article-title: Revealing the dual streams of speech processing
  publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
– volume: 77
  start-page: 586
  year: 2013
  end-page: 595
  article-title: Individual variability in functional connectivity architecture of the human brain
  publication-title: Neuron
– volume: 10
  year: 2015b
  article-title: Task type affects location of language‐positive cortical regions by repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 221
  start-page: 2259
  year: 2016
  end-page: 2286
  article-title: Cortical distribution of speech and language errors investigated by visual object naming and navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation
  publication-title: Brain Structure & Function
– volume: 115
  start-page: 101
  year: 2010
  end-page: 112
  article-title: Analysis of naming errors during cortical stimulation mapping: Implications for models of language representation
  publication-title: Brain and Language
– volume: 13
  start-page: 267
  year: 2020
  end-page: 269
  article-title: Automated speech analysis to improve TMS‐based language mapping: Algorithm and proof of concept
  publication-title: Brain Stimulation
– volume: 41
  start-page: 697
  year: 1991
  end-page: 702
  article-title: Induction of speech arrest and counting errors with rapid‐rate transcranial magnetic stimulation
  publication-title: Neurology
– volume: 57
  start-page: 289
  year: 1995
  end-page: 300
  article-title: Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing
  publication-title: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological)
– volume: 127
  start-page: 1916
  year: 2016b
  end-page: 1918
  article-title: Safety and tolerability of navigated TMS in healthy volunteers
  publication-title: Clinical Neurophysiology
– volume: 72
  start-page: 808
  year: 2013
  end-page: 819
  article-title: A comparison of language mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and direct cortical stimulation during awake surgery
  publication-title: Neurosurgery
– volume: 160
  start-page: 343
  year: 2018
  end-page: 356
  article-title: Aphasia and cognitive impairment decrease the reliability of rnTMS language mapping
  publication-title: Acta Neurochirurgica
– volume: 159
  start-page: 1187
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1195
  article-title: Protocol for motor and language mapping by navigated TMS in patients and healthy volunteers; workshop report
  publication-title: Acta Neurochirurgica
– volume: 100
  start-page: 219
  year: 2014
  end-page: 236
  article-title: Optimal timing of pulse onset for language mapping with navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
  publication-title: NeuroImage
– volume: 41
  start-page: 3970
  end-page: 3983
  article-title: Invasive versus non‐invasive mapping of the motor cortex
  publication-title: Human Brain Mapping
– volume: 17
  start-page: 67
  year: 2016
  article-title: Results on the spatial resolution of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cortical language mapping during object naming in healthy subjects
  publication-title: BMC Neuroscience
– volume: 222
  start-page: 1645
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1662
  article-title: Revisiting the human uncinate fasciculus, its subcomponents and asymmetries with stem‐based tractography and microdissection validation
  publication-title: Brain Structure & Function
– volume: 133
  start-page: 286
  year: 2010
  end-page: 299
  article-title: Language networks in semantic dementia
  publication-title: Brain
– volume: 120
  start-page: 2008
  year: 2009
  end-page: 2039
  article-title: Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research
  publication-title: Clinical Neurophysiology
– volume: 123
  start-page: 314
  year: 2015a
  end-page: 324
  article-title: Impairment of preoperative language mapping by lesion location: A functional magnetic resonance imaging, navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation, and direct cortical stimulation study
  publication-title: Journal of Neurosurgery
– volume: 32
  start-page: 418
  year: 2019
  end-page: 434
  article-title: Cortical inhibition of face and jaw muscle activity and discomfort induced by repetitive and paired‐pulse TMS during an overt object naming task
  publication-title: Brain Topography
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1
  year: 2005
  end-page: 10
  article-title: Dissociation of action and object naming: Evidence from cortical stimulation mapping
  publication-title: Human Brain Mapping
– volume: 16
  start-page: 5
  year: 2015a
  article-title: Stimulation frequency determines the distribution of language positive cortical regions during navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation
  publication-title: BMC Neuroscience
– volume: 23
  start-page: 46
  year: 2004
  end-page: 53
  article-title: Determination of language dominance with synthetic aperture magnetometry: Comparison with the Wada test
  publication-title: NeuroImage
– volume: 158
  start-page: S11
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2017
  end-page: s18
  article-title: Individual differences in pain: Understanding the mosaic that makes pain personal
  publication-title: Pain
– volume: 112
  start-page: 528
  year: 2010
  end-page: 538
  article-title: Language dominance and mapping based on neuromagnetic oscillatory changes: Comparison with invasive procedures
  publication-title: Journal of Neurosurgery
– volume: 14
  start-page: 150
  year: 2013
  article-title: Intra‐ and interobserver variability of language mapping by navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation
  publication-title: BMC Neuroscience
– volume: 8
  start-page: Mm01
  year: 2014
  end-page: Mm02
  article-title: Poor tolerance of motor cortex rTMS in chronic migraine
  publication-title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
– volume: 12
  start-page: 197
  year: 2018
  article-title: Investigating stimulation protocols for language mapping by repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation
  publication-title: Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
– volume: 15
  start-page: 13
  year: 1992
  end-page: 14
  article-title: Cortical map plasticity in humans
  publication-title: Trends in Neurosciences
– volume: 68
  start-page: 1317
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1324
  article-title: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging: Advanced adjuncts in preoperative planning for central region tumors
  publication-title: Neurosurgery
– volume: 3
  start-page: 299
  year: 2014
  end-page: 310
  article-title: Current and potential utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the diagnostics before brain tumor surgery
  publication-title: CNS Oncology
– start-page: 10
  year: 2021
– volume: 204
  start-page: 349
  year: 2012
  end-page: 354
  article-title: A novel approach for documenting naming errors induced by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation
  publication-title: Journal of Neuroscience Methods
– volume: 134
  start-page: 405
  year: 2011
  end-page: 414
  article-title: What is the role of the uncinate fasciculus? Surgical removal and proper name retrieval
  publication-title: Brain
– year: 2000
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1071
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1092
– volume: 81
  start-page: 95
  year: 2020
  end-page: 104
  article-title: Accelerated Clustered Sparse Acquisition to Improve Functional MRI for Mapping Language Functions
  publication-title: Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery
– volume: 120
  start-page: 1033
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1041
  article-title: Inducing transient language disruptions by mapping of Broca's area with modified patterned repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol
  publication-title: Journal of Neurosurgery
– volume: 22
  start-page: 259
  year: 2006
  end-page: 264
  article-title: Reducing pain and unpleasantness during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
  publication-title: The Journal of ECT
– volume: 66
  start-page: 531
  year: 2013
  end-page: 542
  article-title: Mapping the hand, foot and face representations in the primary motor cortex ‐ retest reliability of neuronavigated TMS versus functional MRI
  publication-title: NeuroImage
– volume: 253
  start-page: 70
  year: 2015
  end-page: 77
  article-title: Accelerometer‐based automatic voice onset detection in speech mapping with navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
  publication-title: Journal of Neuroscience Methods
– volume: 127
  start-page: 1895
  year: 2016a
  end-page: 1900
  article-title: Safety and tolerability of navigated TMS for preoperative mapping in neurosurgical patients
  publication-title: Clinical Neurophysiology
– volume: 82
  start-page: 260
  year: 2013
  end-page: 272
  article-title: Language mapping with navigated repetitive TMS: Proof of technique and validation
  publication-title: NeuroImage
– volume: 71
  start-page: 316
  year: 1989
  end-page: 326
  article-title: Cortical language localization in left, dominant hemisphere. An electrical stimulation mapping investigation in 117 patients
  publication-title: Journal of Neurosurgery
– volume: 123
  start-page: 212
  year: 2015b
  end-page: 225
  article-title: Combined noninvasive language mapping by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional MRI and its comparison with direct cortical stimulation
  publication-title: Journal of Neurosurgery
– volume: 20
  start-page: 47
  year: 2015
  article-title: The impact of repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation coil positioning and stimulation parameters on human language function
  publication-title: European Journal of Medical Research
– volume: 15
  start-page: 325
  year: 1998
  end-page: 332
  article-title: Transcranial magnetic stimulation: Language function
  publication-title: Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
– volume: 108
  start-page: 1
  year: 1998
  end-page: 16
  article-title: Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report and suggested guidelines from the international workshop on the safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, June 5–7, 1996
  publication-title: Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
– volume: 8
  start-page: 393
  year: 2007
  end-page: 402
  article-title: The cortical organization of speech processing
  publication-title: Nature Reviews. Neuroscience
– volume: 176
  start-page: 215
  year: 2018
  end-page: 225
  article-title: Short‐ and long‐term reliability of language fMRI
  publication-title: NeuroImage
– ident: e_1_2_11_13_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12868-015-0143-9
– ident: e_1_2_11_19_1
  doi: 10.3171/2014.9.JNS14929
– ident: e_1_2_11_43_1
  doi: 10.1186/s40001-015-0138-0
– ident: e_1_2_11_5_1
  doi: 10.1002/hbm.20063
– ident: e_1_2_11_40_1
  doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00197
– ident: e_1_2_11_26_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.050
– ident: e_1_2_11_39_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.10.001
– volume-title: Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_11_33_1
– ident: e_1_2_11_24_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.11.003
– ident: e_1_2_11_27_1
  doi: 10.3171/jns.1989.71.3.0316
– ident: e_1_2_11_20_1
  doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1691821
– ident: e_1_2_11_31_1
  doi: 10.2217/cns.14.25
– ident: e_1_2_11_4_1
  doi: 10.1097/01.yct.0000244248.40662.9a
– ident: e_1_2_11_14_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125298
– ident: e_1_2_11_11_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00429-016-1298-6
– ident: e_1_2_11_23_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.016
– ident: e_1_2_11_50_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.046
– ident: e_1_2_11_3_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
– ident: e_1_2_11_18_1
  doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS141582
– ident: e_1_2_11_10_1
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614038114
– ident: e_1_2_11_42_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12868-016-0305-4
– ident: e_1_2_11_52_1
  doi: 10.1002/hbm.25101
– ident: e_1_2_11_25_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.028
– ident: e_1_2_11_35_1
  doi: 10.3171/2013.11.JNS13952
– ident: e_1_2_11_15_1
  doi: 10.1038/nrn2113
– ident: e_1_2_11_28_1
  doi: 10.1093/brain/awq283
– ident: e_1_2_11_2_1
  doi: 10.1093/brain/awp233
– ident: e_1_2_11_21_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3187-z
– ident: e_1_2_11_51_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10548-019-00698-9
– ident: e_1_2_11_48_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.05.015
– ident: e_1_2_11_8_1
  doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000775
– ident: e_1_2_11_30_1
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.41.5.697
– ident: e_1_2_11_9_1
  doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820b528c
– ident: e_1_2_11_16_1
  doi: 10.3171/2009.7.JNS09239
– volume: 8
  start-page: Mm01
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_11_47_1
  article-title: Poor tolerance of motor cortex rTMS in chronic migraine
  publication-title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
– ident: e_1_2_11_38_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3397-4
– ident: e_1_2_11_41_1
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-14-150
– ident: e_1_2_11_32_1
  doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182889e01
– ident: e_1_2_11_37_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016
– ident: e_1_2_11_49_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00096-8
– ident: e_1_2_11_29_1
  doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90341-5
– ident: e_1_2_11_22_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00429-015-1042-7
– ident: e_1_2_11_7_1
  doi: 10.1097/00004691-199807000-00004
– ident: e_1_2_11_36_1
  doi: 10.3390/jcm10040655
– ident: e_1_2_11_44_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.018
– ident: e_1_2_11_12_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11682-018-9921-1
– ident: e_1_2_11_17_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.009
– ident: e_1_2_11_46_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.043
– ident: e_1_2_11_45_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.042
– ident: e_1_2_11_6_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.04.001
– ident: e_1_2_11_34_1
  doi: 10.1152/jn.00467.2013
SSID ssj0011501
Score 2.4043214
Snippet Repetitive TMS (rTMS) with a frequency of 5–10 Hz is widely used for language mapping. However, it may be accompanied by discomfort and is limited in the...
Repetitive TMS (rTMS) with a frequency of 5-10 Hz is widely used for language mapping. However, it may be accompanied by discomfort and is limited in the...
Repetitive TMS (rTMS) with a frequency of 5–10 Hz is widely used for language mapping. However, it may be accompanied by discomfort and is limited in the...
Repetitive TMS (rTMS) with a frequency of 5-10 Hz is widely used for language mapping. However, it may be accompanied by discomfort and is limited in the...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 5309
SubjectTerms brain stimulation
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
Discomfort
Electric fields
error rate
Errors
Hemispheric laterality
Language
Mapping
noninvasive
pain
picture naming
Reliability
speech mapping
Stimulation
TMS
tolerability
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Variance analysis
virtual lesion
Title Improving the efficacy and reliability of rTMS language mapping by increasing the stimulation frequency
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fhbm.25619
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34387388
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2582270526
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2561481785
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8519874
Volume 42
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1La9wwEB5CAqWX0iZ9bJMuaimlFzcrW5ZkekpKwlLYENIE9mZkPZJA11t2k4P_fWbkR7ukhV6MQbIsezSaTzOaTwAf08o4mSuVWB9UghYfVWqS-UQLJ6RR0hWKkpNnZ3J6Jb7P8_kWfO1zYVp-iMHhRpoR52tScFOtD3-Tht5Uiy9or4nyc4dSa-n4glScDyEERDpxtYU2NilwCu5phSbp4fDopjF6hDAfb5T8E8BGC3T6HJ510JEdtbJ-AVu-3oW9oxqXzYuGfWJxM2f0ku_Ck1kXM9-D68FvwBDsMU-cEcY2zNSOrfAftETdDVsGtrqc_WC9B5MtDHE3XLOqYbc1gct13wZOC4vu2C8WVu1m7OYlXJ2eXH6bJt3xCokVCEMSLnwlJ5mZeF5ReM9WzjnOC62d1pZzI4wshA5ZMDJQ-M9o73OunMxkXmETr2C7Xtb-DTBrFUIdrjwCQFxfOso6KWwW0hSXYyHoEXzu_3NpO-5xOgLjZ9myJqcliqSMIhnBh6Hqr5Zw42-VDnphlZ3OrbEEwY4i_poRvB-KUVsoBGJqv7xfx6eF5krnI3jdynZ4SyYyrTKNnVUbUh8qEBP3Zkl9exMZuRG2FloJ_Mw4Pv7d8XJ6PIs3b_-_6j48TWkjTUyAPIDtu9W9f4dI6K4axxGPVzVXY9g5Pjk7vxhHrwJdL9IH1-MI8A
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Lb9QwEB5VRQIuCFqgCwUMQohL6DpxbEfiUhDVAk2FxFbqLXL8aCuxWbTbHvLvmXEesCpI3CL5kcTj8XwzY38GeJ3WxslcqcT6oBK0-KhS08wnWjghjZKuUHQ4uTyRs1Px5Sw_24L3w1mYjh9iDLiRZsT1mhScAtIHv1lDL-rFOzTYxPl5SyAupzmdim9jDgGhTnS30MgmBa7BA6_QND0Ym25aoxsQ8-ZOyT8RbDRBR_fhXo8d2WEn7Aew5Zsd2D1s0G9etOwNi7s5Y5h8B26XfdJ8F87HwAFDtMc8kUYY2zLTOLbCQeiYulu2DGw1L7-zIYTJFobIG85Z3bLLhtDleugD14VFf-8XC6tuN3b7EE6PPs0_zpL-foXECsQhCRe-ltPMTD2vKb9na-cc54XWTmvLuRFGFkKHLBgZKP9ntPc5V05mMq-xi0ew3SwbvwfMWoVYhyuPCBAdTEfHTgqbhTRFfywEPYG3wzhXticfpzswflQdbXJaoUiqKJIJvBqr_uwYN_5WaX8QVtUr3RpLEO0oIrCZwMuxGNWFciCm8cvrdWwtNFc6n8DjTrbjWzKRaZVp_Fi1IfWxAlFxb5Y0lxeRkhtxa6GVwN-M8-PfH17NPpTx4cn_V30Bd2bz8rg6_nzy9SncTWlXTTwNuQ_bV6tr_wxh0VX9PM7-X1EMCAY
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Zb9QwEB5VRap4QbTlWFrAIIR4CV0nju2Ip3KslmOrSrRS3yLHR1upm61224f8e2acA1YFibdIPpJ4PJ5vPOPPAG_SyjiZK5VYH1SCFh9Vapz5RAsnpFHSFYoOJ8-O5PRUfDvLzzbgQ38WpuWHGDbcSDPiek0Kfu3CwW_S0Itq_h7tNVF-3qNgH-XzpeJ4CCEg0oneFtrYpMAluKcVGqcHQ9N1Y3QHYd5NlPwTwEYLNHkIDzroyA5bWW_Dhq93YPewRrd53rC3LCZzxl3yHdiadTHzXTgf9g0Ygj3miTPC2IaZ2rEljkFL1N2wRWDLk9lP1u9gsrkh7oZzVjXssiZwuer7wGVh3l37xcKyTcZuHsHp5MvJp2nSXa-QWIEwJOHCV3KcmbHnFYX3bOWc47zQ2mltOTfCyELokAUjA4X_jPY-58rJTOYVdvEYNutF7Z8Cs1Yh1OHKIwBE_9LRqZPCZiFN0R0LQY_gXT_Ope24x-kKjKuyZU1OSxRJGUUygtdD1euWcONvlfZ7YZWdzq2wBMGOIv6aEbwailFbKARiar-4XcXWQnOl8xE8aWU7vCUTmVaZxo9Va1IfKhAT93pJfXkRGbkRthZaCfzNOD_-_eHl9OMsPjz7_6ovYev486T88fXo-x7cTymnJp6F3IfNm-Wtf46g6KZ6ESf_L6dWBy8
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving+the+efficacy+and+reliability+of+rTMS+language+mapping+by+increasing+the+stimulation+frequency&rft.jtitle=Human+brain+mapping&rft.au=Nettekoven%2C+Charlotte&rft.au=Pieczewski%2C+Julia&rft.au=Neuschmelting%2C+Volker&rft.au=Jonas%2C+Kristina&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.pub=John+Wiley+%26+Sons%2C+Inc&rft.issn=1065-9471&rft.eissn=1097-0193&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=5309&rft.epage=5321&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fhbm.25619&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1065-9471&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1065-9471&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1065-9471&client=summon