Ants as ecological indicators of rainforest restoration: Community convergence and the development of an Ant Forest Indicator Index in the Australian wet tropics
Ecosystem restoration can help reverse biodiversity loss, but whether faunal communities of forests undergoing restoration converge with those of primary forest over time remains contentious. There is a need to develop faunal indicators of restoration success that more comprehensively reflect change...
Saved in:
Published in | Ecology and evolution Vol. 7; no. 20; pp. 8442 - 8455 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.10.2017
John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Ecosystem restoration can help reverse biodiversity loss, but whether faunal communities of forests undergoing restoration converge with those of primary forest over time remains contentious. There is a need to develop faunal indicators of restoration success that more comprehensively reflect changes in biodiversity and ecosystem function. Ants are an ecologically dominant faunal group and are widely advocated as ecological indicators. We examine ant species and functional group responses on a chronosequence of rainforest restoration in northern Australia, and develop a novel method for selecting and using indicator species. Four sampling techniques were used to survey ants at 48 sites, from grassland, through various ages (1–24 years) of restoration plantings, to mature forest. From principal components analysis of seven vegetation metrics, we derived a Forest Development Index (FDI) of vegetation change along the chronosequence. A novel Ant Forest Indicator Index (AFII), based on the occurrences of ten key indicator species associated with either grassland or mature forest, was used to assess ant community change with forest restoration. Grasslands and mature forests supported compositionally distinct ant communities at both species and functional levels. The AFII was strongly correlated with forest development (FDI). At forest restoration sites older than 5–10 years that had a relatively closed canopy, ant communities converged on those of mature rainforest, indicating a promising restoration trajectory for fauna as well as plants. Our findings reinforce the utility of ants as ecological indicators and emphasize the importance of restoration methods that achieve rapid closed‐canopy conditions. The novel AFII assessed restoration status from diverse and patchily distributed species, closely tracking ant community succession using comprehensive species‐level data. It has wide applicability for assessing forest restoration in a way that is relatively independent of sampling methodology and intensity, and without a need for new comparative data from reference sites.
We show that ant communities at rainforest sites undergoing restoration show strong convergence with those of mature rainforest. We confirm the utility of using ants as indicators of restoration success, and provide a novel index based on the occurrence of targeted indicator species for assessing the efficacy of forest restoration. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Ecosystem restoration can help reverse biodiversity loss, but whether faunal communities of forests undergoing restoration converge with those of primary forest over time remains contentious. There is a need to develop faunal indicators of restoration success that more comprehensively reflect changes in biodiversity and ecosystem function. Ants are an ecologically dominant faunal group and are widely advocated as ecological indicators. We examine ant species and functional group responses on a chronosequence of rainforest restoration in northern Australia, and develop a novel method for selecting and using indicator species. Four sampling techniques were used to survey ants at 48 sites, from grassland, through various ages (1–24 years) of restoration plantings, to mature forest. From principal components analysis of seven vegetation metrics, we derived a Forest Development Index (
FDI
) of vegetation change along the chronosequence. A novel Ant Forest Indicator Index (
AFII
), based on the occurrences of ten key indicator species associated with either grassland or mature forest, was used to assess ant community change with forest restoration. Grasslands and mature forests supported compositionally distinct ant communities at both species and functional levels. The
AFII
was strongly correlated with forest development (
FDI
). At forest restoration sites older than 5–10 years that had a relatively closed canopy, ant communities converged on those of mature rainforest, indicating a promising restoration trajectory for fauna as well as plants. Our findings reinforce the utility of ants as ecological indicators and emphasize the importance of restoration methods that achieve rapid closed‐canopy conditions. The novel
AFII
assessed restoration status from diverse and patchily distributed species, closely tracking ant community succession using comprehensive species‐level data. It has wide applicability for assessing forest restoration in a way that is relatively independent of sampling methodology and intensity, and without a need for new comparative data from reference sites. Ecosystem restoration can help reverse biodiversity loss, but whether faunal communities of forests undergoing restoration converge with those of primary forest over time remains contentious. There is a need to develop faunal indicators of restoration success that more comprehensively reflect changes in biodiversity and ecosystem function. Ants are an ecologically dominant faunal group and are widely advocated as ecological indicators. We examine ant species and functional group responses on a chronosequence of rainforest restoration in northern Australia, and develop a novel method for selecting and using indicator species. Four sampling techniques were used to survey ants at 48 sites, from grassland, through various ages (1–24 years) of restoration plantings, to mature forest. From principal components analysis of seven vegetation metrics, we derived a Forest Development Index (FDI) of vegetation change along the chronosequence. A novel Ant Forest Indicator Index (AFII), based on the occurrences of ten key indicator species associated with either grassland or mature forest, was used to assess ant community change with forest restoration. Grasslands and mature forests supported compositionally distinct ant communities at both species and functional levels. The AFII was strongly correlated with forest development (FDI). At forest restoration sites older than 5–10 years that had a relatively closed canopy, ant communities converged on those of mature rainforest, indicating a promising restoration trajectory for fauna as well as plants. Our findings reinforce the utility of ants as ecological indicators and emphasize the importance of restoration methods that achieve rapid closed‐canopy conditions. The novel AFII assessed restoration status from diverse and patchily distributed species, closely tracking ant community succession using comprehensive species‐level data. It has wide applicability for assessing forest restoration in a way that is relatively independent of sampling methodology and intensity, and without a need for new comparative data from reference sites. We show that ant communities at rainforest sites undergoing restoration show strong convergence with those of mature rainforest. We confirm the utility of using ants as indicators of restoration success, and provide a novel index based on the occurrence of targeted indicator species for assessing the efficacy of forest restoration. Ecosystem restoration can help reverse biodiversity loss, but whether faunal communities of forests undergoing restoration converge with those of primary forest over time remains contentious. There is a need to develop faunal indicators of restoration success that more comprehensively reflect changes in biodiversity and ecosystem function. Ants are an ecologically dominant faunal group and are widely advocated as ecological indicators. We examine ant species and functional group responses on a chronosequence of rainforest restoration in northern Australia, and develop a novel method for selecting and using indicator species. Four sampling techniques were used to survey ants at 48 sites, from grassland, through various ages (1-24 years) of restoration plantings, to mature forest. From principal components analysis of seven vegetation metrics, we derived a Forest Development Index (FDI) of vegetation change along the chronosequence. A novel Ant Forest Indicator Index (AFII), based on the occurrences of ten key indicator species associated with either grassland or mature forest, was used to assess ant community change with forest restoration. Grasslands and mature forests supported compositionally distinct ant communities at both species and functional levels. The AFII was strongly correlated with forest development (FDI). At forest restoration sites older than 5-10 years that had a relatively closed canopy, ant communities converged on those of mature rainforest, indicating a promising restoration trajectory for fauna as well as plants. Our findings reinforce the utility of ants as ecological indicators and emphasize the importance of restoration methods that achieve rapid closed-canopy conditions. The novel AFII assessed restoration status from diverse and patchily distributed species, closely tracking ant community succession using comprehensive species-level data. It has wide applicability for assessing forest restoration in a way that is relatively independent of sampling methodology and intensity, and without a need for new comparative data from reference sites. Ecosystem restoration can help reverse biodiversity loss, but whether faunal communities of forests undergoing restoration converge with those of primary forest over time remains contentious. There is a need to develop faunal indicators of restoration success that more comprehensively reflect changes in biodiversity and ecosystem function. Ants are an ecologically dominant faunal group and are widely advocated as ecological indicators. We examine ant species and functional group responses on a chronosequence of rainforest restoration in northern Australia, and develop a novel method for selecting and using indicator species. Four sampling techniques were used to survey ants at 48 sites, from grassland, through various ages (1–24 years) of restoration plantings, to mature forest. From principal components analysis of seven vegetation metrics, we derived a Forest Development Index (FDI) of vegetation change along the chronosequence. A novel Ant Forest Indicator Index (AFII), based on the occurrences of ten key indicator species associated with either grassland or mature forest, was used to assess ant community change with forest restoration. Grasslands and mature forests supported compositionally distinct ant communities at both species and functional levels. The AFII was strongly correlated with forest development (FDI). At forest restoration sites older than 5–10 years that had a relatively closed canopy, ant communities converged on those of mature rainforest, indicating a promising restoration trajectory for fauna as well as plants. Our findings reinforce the utility of ants as ecological indicators and emphasize the importance of restoration methods that achieve rapid closed-canopy conditions. The novel AFII assessed restoration status from diverse and patchily distributed species, closely tracking ant community succession using comprehensive species-level data. It has wide applicability for assessing forest restoration in a way that is relatively independent of sampling methodology and intensity, and without a need for new comparative data from reference sites. Ecosystem restoration can help reverse biodiversity loss, but whether faunal communities of forests undergoing restoration converge with those of primary forest over time remains contentious. There is a need to develop faunal indicators of restoration success that more comprehensively reflect changes in biodiversity and ecosystem function. Ants are an ecologically dominant faunal group and are widely advocated as ecological indicators. We examine ant species and functional group responses on a chronosequence of rainforest restoration in northern Australia, and develop a novel method for selecting and using indicator species. Four sampling techniques were used to survey ants at 48 sites, from grassland, through various ages (1-24 years) of restoration plantings, to mature forest. From principal components analysis of seven vegetation metrics, we derived a Forest Development Index (FDI) of vegetation change along the chronosequence. A novel Ant Forest Indicator Index (AFII), based on the occurrences of ten key indicator species associated with either grassland or mature forest, was used to assess ant community change with forest restoration. Grasslands and mature forests supported compositionally distinct ant communities at both species and functional levels. The AFII was strongly correlated with forest development (FDI). At forest restoration sites older than 5-10 years that had a relatively closed canopy, ant communities converged on those of mature rainforest, indicating a promising restoration trajectory for fauna as well as plants. Our findings reinforce the utility of ants as ecological indicators and emphasize the importance of restoration methods that achieve rapid closed-canopy conditions. The novel AFII assessed restoration status from diverse and patchily distributed species, closely tracking ant community succession using comprehensive species-level data. It has wide applicability for assessing forest restoration in a way that is relatively independent of sampling methodology and intensity, and without a need for new comparative data from reference sites.Ecosystem restoration can help reverse biodiversity loss, but whether faunal communities of forests undergoing restoration converge with those of primary forest over time remains contentious. There is a need to develop faunal indicators of restoration success that more comprehensively reflect changes in biodiversity and ecosystem function. Ants are an ecologically dominant faunal group and are widely advocated as ecological indicators. We examine ant species and functional group responses on a chronosequence of rainforest restoration in northern Australia, and develop a novel method for selecting and using indicator species. Four sampling techniques were used to survey ants at 48 sites, from grassland, through various ages (1-24 years) of restoration plantings, to mature forest. From principal components analysis of seven vegetation metrics, we derived a Forest Development Index (FDI) of vegetation change along the chronosequence. A novel Ant Forest Indicator Index (AFII), based on the occurrences of ten key indicator species associated with either grassland or mature forest, was used to assess ant community change with forest restoration. Grasslands and mature forests supported compositionally distinct ant communities at both species and functional levels. The AFII was strongly correlated with forest development (FDI). At forest restoration sites older than 5-10 years that had a relatively closed canopy, ant communities converged on those of mature rainforest, indicating a promising restoration trajectory for fauna as well as plants. Our findings reinforce the utility of ants as ecological indicators and emphasize the importance of restoration methods that achieve rapid closed-canopy conditions. The novel AFII assessed restoration status from diverse and patchily distributed species, closely tracking ant community succession using comprehensive species-level data. It has wide applicability for assessing forest restoration in a way that is relatively independent of sampling methodology and intensity, and without a need for new comparative data from reference sites. |
Author | Lawes, Michael J. Andersen, Alan N. Franklin, Donald C. Preece, Noel D. Moore, Anthony M. |
AuthorAffiliation | 4 Centre for Tropical Environmental & Sustainability Science College of Science & Engineering James Cook University Townsville Qld Australia 5 Biome5 Pty Ltd. Atherton Qld Australia 3 CSIRO Land & Water Flagship Darwin NT Australia 1 Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods Charles Darwin University Darwin NT Australia 2 Department of Geography McGill University Montreal QC Canada |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 Department of Geography McGill University Montreal QC Canada – name: 4 Centre for Tropical Environmental & Sustainability Science College of Science & Engineering James Cook University Townsville Qld Australia – name: 5 Biome5 Pty Ltd. Atherton Qld Australia – name: 1 Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods Charles Darwin University Darwin NT Australia – name: 3 CSIRO Land & Water Flagship Darwin NT Australia |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Michael J. orcidid: 0000-0002-2381-6147 surname: Lawes fullname: Lawes, Michael J. organization: McGill University – sequence: 2 givenname: Anthony M. surname: Moore fullname: Moore, Anthony M. organization: Charles Darwin University – sequence: 3 givenname: Alan N. surname: Andersen fullname: Andersen, Alan N. email: alan.andersen@cdu.edu.au organization: CSIRO Land & Water Flagship – sequence: 4 givenname: Noel D. surname: Preece fullname: Preece, Noel D. organization: Biome5 Pty Ltd – sequence: 5 givenname: Donald C. surname: Franklin fullname: Franklin, Donald C. organization: Charles Darwin University |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29075461$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9ks9uEzEQxi1UREvpgRdAlrjAIa3Xf9a7HJCiKIVKlbjA2XLs2dTVrh1sb0oehzfFm7RVqQQ-2CP5N998o5nX6MgHDwi9rch5RQi9AAPsnLYtfYFOKOFiJqVojp7Ex-gspVtSTk0oJ_IVOqYtkYLX1Qn6Pfc5YZ0wmNCHtTO6x87b8uYQEw4djtr5LkRIGU9XiDq74D_hRRiG0bu8wyb4LcQ1eANYe4vzDWALW-jDZgCfJxHtcSmELw86Vw8Fpgh-lYL7nPmYctS9K_AdZJxj2DiT3qCXne4TnN2_p-jH5fL74uvs-tuXq8X8emY4Z3TGaw1m1UoLBBilBGzHqZV113amMU2rBTBjO0pXoqKGGQGWsrpprDTESGLZKfp80N2MqwGsKc6LGbWJbtBxp4J26u8f727UOmyVqHlTi6YIfLgXiOHnWPpUg0sG-l57CGNSVSskl4TVvKDvn6G3YYy-tDdRrOFtU4lCvXvq6NHKw_QK8PEAmBhSitA9IhVR03KoaTnUtByFvXjGGpf3oyzNuP5_GXeuh92_pdVysWT7jD-GfM6x |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tree_2022_07_007 crossref_primary_10_1111_een_13136 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actao_2021_103702 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2018_08_320 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42974_025_00245_6 crossref_primary_10_1051_e3sconf_202017402016 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0242020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2018_05_037 crossref_primary_10_5327_Z217694781030 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42690_023_01152_x crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_224_1_012034 crossref_primary_10_1093_ee_nvac092 crossref_primary_10_1177_19400829211008756 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13735 crossref_primary_10_1002_tqem_21641 crossref_primary_10_1111_aec_12676 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_14316 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_47595_6 crossref_primary_10_1080_23766808_2020_1744957 crossref_primary_10_3390_insects15090719 crossref_primary_10_1002_ldr_3475 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_13852 crossref_primary_10_2989_10220119_2018_1518486 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2023_110243 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_153403 crossref_primary_10_3390_insects10070218 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actao_2023_103894 crossref_primary_10_3897_BDJ_9_e65768 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13605 crossref_primary_10_3390_f12050625 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_14104 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2656_12907 crossref_primary_10_1111_een_12826 crossref_primary_10_1093_ee_nvad037 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00512-6 10.1126/science.1155365 10.1023/A:1008891901953 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.016 10.1007/PL00008824 10.1023/A:1008857214743 10.1111/rec.12254 10.1111/rec.12312 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.05.027 10.2307/1935016 10.1007/s10531-007-9274-3 10.1023/A:1017202329114 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2010.00506.x 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.005 10.1111/cobi.12337 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.005 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.012 10.2307/2846070 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98229.x 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.016 10.1002/16-0108.1 10.1023/A:1018422807610 10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00109-9 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.07.006 10.1007/s10021-010-9394-6 10.2307/1941776 10.1007/BF00055827 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00154.x 10.1046/j.1442-8903.4.s.2.x 10.7882/FS.2004.021 10.1007/s10531-010-9874-1 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.06.012 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0292:ASTWDU]2.0.CO;2 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.04054.x 10.1007/s10531-012-0271-9 10.1111/emr.12068 10.1007/s10841-006-9034-9 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.005 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00704.x 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01301.x 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.72023.x 10.1111/rec.12168 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2009.00056.x 10.1046/j.1442-8903.4.s.3.x 10.1126/science.1244693 10.1017/S0266467408005166 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.008 10.1071/WR14082 10.1017/S000632319700515X 10.1007/s10531-016-1111-0 10.1111/cobi.12730 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.05.004 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.01943.x 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00072.x 10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.601 10.1016/0006-3207(94)90325-5 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00354-6 10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80048.x 10.1007/s10530-007-9194-x |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2017 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2017 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. – notice: 2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | 24P AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7SN 7SS 7ST 7X2 8FD 8FE 8FH 8FK ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI C1K CCPQU DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ HCIFZ LK8 M0K M7P P64 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS RC3 SOI 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1002/ece3.2992 |
DatabaseName | Wiley Online Library Open Access CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Environment Abstracts Agricultural Science Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability (subscription) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Engineering Research Database ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection Biological Sciences Agricultural Science Database Biological Science Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Genetics Abstracts Environment Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Agricultural Science Database Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central China Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability Genetics Abstracts Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Agricultural Science Collection Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection Ecology Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Entomology Abstracts ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Environment Abstracts ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef PubMed Agricultural Science Database MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Online Library Open Access url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Ecology |
EISSN | 2045-7758 |
EndPage | 8455 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC5648658 29075461 10_1002_ece3_2992 ECE32992 |
Genre | article Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Australian Research Council funderid: LP0989161 – fundername: Australian Research Council grantid: LP0989161 |
GroupedDBID | 0R~ 1OC 24P 53G 5VS 7X2 8-0 8-1 8FE 8FH AAFWJ AAHBH AAHHS AAZKR ACCFJ ACCMX ACGFO ACPRK ACXQS ADBBV ADKYN ADRAZ ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AENEX AEQDE AEUYN AFKRA AFRAH AIAGR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AOIJS ATCPS AVUZU BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BHPHI CCPQU D-8 D-9 DIK EBS ECGQY EJD GODZA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HYE IAO IEP ITC KQ8 LK8 M0K M48 M7P M~E OK1 PIMPY PROAC RNS ROL RPM SUPJJ WIN AAYXX AFPKN CITATION PHGZM PHGZT NPM 3V. 7SN 7SS 7ST 8FD 8FK AAMMB ABUWG AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY AZQEC C1K DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ P64 PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS RC3 SOI 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-46aecb97de0e3220edf42d76f9fc8c89a5e3cdf22b512c3c5ed23688d7c0c70d3 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 2045-7758 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 17:46:52 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 18:56:08 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 07:49:46 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:01:38 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:50 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:04:12 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:39:20 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 20 |
Keywords | succession indicator species functional groups rainforest restoration habitat condition |
Language | English |
License | Attribution http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4432-46aecb97de0e3220edf42d76f9fc8c89a5e3cdf22b512c3c5ed23688d7c0c70d3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-2381-6147 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1002/ece3.2992 |
PMID | 29075461 |
PQID | 1953849815 |
PQPubID | 2034651 |
PageCount | 14 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5648658 proquest_miscellaneous_1957470364 proquest_journals_1953849815 pubmed_primary_29075461 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_2992 crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_ece3_2992 wiley_primary_10_1002_ece3_2992_ECE32992 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | October 2017 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-10-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2017 text: October 2017 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: Bognor Regis – name: Hoboken |
PublicationTitle | Ecology and evolution |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Ecol Evol |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc – name: John Wiley and Sons Inc |
References | 2010; 11 2001; 142 1990; 16 2010; 19 2007; 140 2006; 38 2000; 8 2015; 186 1999; 120 2005; 217 2016; 30 1994; 69 1997; 1 2012; 17 2004; 2 2011; 14 2014; 177 2001; 46 2013; 14 2000 1995; 22 1999; 13 2003; 4 2008; 24 2012; 28 2010; 3 2005; 37 1996; 5 1992; 2 2012; 21 2016; 197 2002; 39 2012; 264 2010 2008; 17 2008 2013; 342 2006 2014; 46 2008; 10 2005 1999; 3 2004 2002 2014; 41 2008; 320 1999; 7 2007; 11 2016; 14 2009; 34 2001; 154 2015; 23 1965; 46 2015; 29 2013; 34 2009; 143 2003; 183 2003; 28 2009; 142 1998; 7 1998; 73 2009; 2 2016; 25 2016; 24 2005; 13 e_1_2_8_28_1 e_1_2_8_24_1 e_1_2_8_47_1 e_1_2_8_26_1 e_1_2_8_49_1 e_1_2_8_68_1 McCune B. (e_1_2_8_50_1) 2002 Holt E. A. (e_1_2_8_34_1) 2010; 3 e_1_2_8_5_1 Kanowski J. (e_1_2_8_38_1) 2010 e_1_2_8_7_1 e_1_2_8_9_1 e_1_2_8_20_1 e_1_2_8_43_1 e_1_2_8_66_1 e_1_2_8_45_1 e_1_2_8_64_1 e_1_2_8_62_1 e_1_2_8_41_1 e_1_2_8_60_1 e_1_2_8_17_1 e_1_2_8_19_1 e_1_2_8_13_1 e_1_2_8_36_1 e_1_2_8_59_1 e_1_2_8_15_1 e_1_2_8_57_1 Andersen A. N. (e_1_2_8_6_1) 2000 e_1_2_8_70_1 e_1_2_8_32_1 e_1_2_8_55_1 e_1_2_8_53_1 e_1_2_8_51_1 e_1_2_8_30_1 e_1_2_8_29_1 e_1_2_8_25_1 e_1_2_8_46_1 e_1_2_8_27_1 e_1_2_8_48_1 e_1_2_8_69_1 e_1_2_8_2_1 e_1_2_8_4_1 Del Toro I. (e_1_2_8_22_1) 2012; 17 e_1_2_8_8_1 e_1_2_8_42_1 e_1_2_8_67_1 e_1_2_8_23_1 e_1_2_8_44_1 e_1_2_8_65_1 e_1_2_8_63_1 e_1_2_8_40_1 e_1_2_8_61_1 e_1_2_8_18_1 e_1_2_8_39_1 e_1_2_8_14_1 e_1_2_8_35_1 e_1_2_8_16_1 e_1_2_8_37_1 e_1_2_8_58_1 Andersen A. N. (e_1_2_8_3_1) 1990; 16 Anderson M. J. (e_1_2_8_11_1) 2008 Clarke K. R. (e_1_2_8_21_1) 2006 e_1_2_8_10_1 e_1_2_8_31_1 e_1_2_8_56_1 e_1_2_8_12_1 e_1_2_8_33_1 e_1_2_8_54_1 e_1_2_8_52_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 37 start-page: 109 year: 2005 end-page: 118 article-title: Epigaeic invertebrates as potential ecological indicators of Afromontane forest condition in South Africa publication-title: Biotropica – start-page: 359 year: 2004 end-page: 393 – volume: 41 start-page: 233 year: 2014 end-page: 242 article-title: Use by small mammals of a chronosequence of tropical rainforest revegetation publication-title: Wildlife Research – volume: 14 start-page: 47 year: 2011 end-page: 59 article-title: Direct measurement versus surrogate indicator species for evaluating environmental change and biodiversity loss publication-title: Ecosystems – volume: 17 start-page: 133 year: 2012 end-page: 146 article-title: The little things that run the world revisited: A review of ant‐mediated ecosystem services and disservices (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) publication-title: Myrmecological News – volume: 7 start-page: 1221 year: 1998 end-page: 1244 article-title: Ant biodiversity and its relationship to ecosystem functioning: A review publication-title: Biodiversity & Conservation – volume: 46 start-page: 156 year: 2014 end-page: 166 article-title: Combining indicator species and key environmental and management factors to predict restoration success of degraded ecosystems publication-title: Ecological Indicators – volume: 2 start-page: 203 year: 1992 end-page: 217 article-title: Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring publication-title: Ecological Applications – volume: 177 start-page: 12 year: 2014 end-page: 24 article-title: Remaining natural vegetation in the global biodiversity hotspots publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 46 start-page: 736 year: 1965 end-page: 740 article-title: and in Bermuda: Equilibrium or slow replacement publication-title: Ecology – volume: 4 start-page: S12 year: 2003 end-page: S19 article-title: Ants as indicators of mine site restoration: Community recovery at one of eight rehabilitation sites in central Queensland publication-title: Ecological Management & Restoration – year: 2005 article-title: Ecosystems and Human Well‐being: Biodiversity Synthesis – volume: 142 start-page: 1220 year: 2009 end-page: 1228 article-title: Selecting terrestrial arthropods as indicators of small‐scale disturbance: A first approach in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 13 start-page: 1301 year: 1999 end-page: 1311 article-title: Forest restoration in abandoned agricultural land: A case study from East Africa publication-title: Conservation Biology – volume: 140 start-page: 273 year: 2007 end-page: 296 article-title: Regrowth forests on abandoned agricultural land: A review of their habitat values for recovering forest fauna publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 34 start-page: 422 year: 2009 end-page: 434 article-title: Biodiversity recovery during rainforest reforestation as indicated by rapid assessment of epigaeic ants in tropical and subtropical Australia publication-title: Austral Ecology – volume: 14 start-page: 37 year: 2016 end-page: 45 article-title: Integrating plant‐ and animal‐based perspectives for more effective restoration of biodiversity publication-title: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment – volume: 46 start-page: 601 year: 2001 end-page: 630 article-title: Colony dispersal and the evolution of queen morphology in social hymenoptera publication-title: Annual Review of Entomology – volume: 14 start-page: 202 year: 2013 end-page: 209 article-title: Potential of ants and beetles as indicators of rainforest restoration: Characterising pasture and rainforest remnants as reference habitats publication-title: Ecological Management & Restoration – volume: 39 start-page: 8 year: 2002 end-page: 17 article-title: Using ants as bioindicators in land management: Simplifying assessment of ant community responses publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology – start-page: 214 year: 2008 – volume: 7 start-page: 1627 year: 1998 end-page: 1638 article-title: Ants as bioindicators of habitat disturbance: Validation of the functional group model for Australia's humid tropics publication-title: Biodiversity and Conservation – volume: 24 start-page: 1 year: 2016 end-page: 3 article-title: Functional composition trajectory: A resolution to the debate between Suganuma, Durigan, and Reid publication-title: Restoration Ecology – volume: 2 start-page: 121 year: 2009 end-page: 131 article-title: Effects of shading and mulch depth on the colonization of habitat patches by arthropods of rainforest soil and litter publication-title: Insect Conservation and Diversity – volume: 7 start-page: 298 year: 1999 end-page: 308 article-title: Assessing the success of restoration plantings in a temperate New Zealand forest publication-title: Restoration Ecology – volume: 120 start-page: 595 year: 1999 end-page: 604 article-title: Impact of an introduced ant on native rain forest invertebrates: in monsoonal Australia publication-title: Oecologia – volume: 3 start-page: 8 year: 2010 article-title: Bioindicators: Using Organisms to Measure Environmental Impacts publication-title: Nature Education Knowledge – volume: 142 start-page: 243 year: 2001 end-page: 249 article-title: Attempting restoration of wet tropical forests in Costa Rica publication-title: Forest Ecology and Management – volume: 13 start-page: 569 year: 2005 end-page: 577 article-title: Restoration success: How is it being measured? publication-title: Restoration Ecology – volume: 69 start-page: 23 year: 1994 end-page: 32 article-title: Rainforest fragmentation and the structure of small mammal communities in tropical Queensland publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 16 start-page: 347 year: 1990 end-page: 357 article-title: The use of ant communities to evaluate change in Australian terrestrial ecosystems: A review and a recipe publication-title: Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia – volume: 30 start-page: 1027 year: 2016 end-page: 1037 article-title: Evaluating complementary networks of restoration plantings for landscape‐scale occurrence of temporally dynamic species publication-title: Conservation Biology – volume: 183 start-page: 265 year: 2003 end-page: 280 article-title: Development of forest structure on cleared rainforest land in eastern Australia under different styles of reforestation publication-title: Forest Ecology and Management – volume: 11 start-page: 2 year: 2010 end-page: 3 article-title: What have we learnt about rainforest restoration in the past two decades? publication-title: Ecological Management & Restoration – volume: 21 start-page: 1687 year: 2012 end-page: 1701 article-title: Effects of habitat fragmentation on ant richness and functional composition in Brazilian Atlantic forest publication-title: Biodiversity and Conservation – volume: 217 start-page: 294 year: 2005 end-page: 306 article-title: Restoration of a forest ecosystem: The effects of vegetation and dispersal capabilities on the reassembly of plant‐dwelling arthropods publication-title: Forest Ecology and Management – start-page: 25 year: 2000 end-page: 34 – volume: 1 start-page: 25 year: 1997 end-page: 42 article-title: Diversity, disturbance, and sustainable use of Neotropical forests: Insects as indicators for conservation monitoring publication-title: Journal of Insect Conservation – volume: 28 start-page: 5 year: 2012 end-page: 19 article-title: More than just trees: Assessing reforestation success in tropical developing countries publication-title: Journal of Rural Studies – volume: 5 start-page: 135 year: 1996 end-page: 168 article-title: The diversity of soil communities, the ‘poor man's tropical rainforest’ publication-title: Biodiversity and Conservation – volume: 17 start-page: 991 year: 2008 end-page: 1015 article-title: Identifying practical indicators of biodiversity for stand‐level management of plantation forests publication-title: Biodiversity and Conservation – volume: 10 start-page: 1171 year: 2008 end-page: 1181 article-title: An invasion revisited: The African big‐headed ant ( ) in northern Australia publication-title: Biological Invasions – volume: 19 start-page: 2741 year: 2010 end-page: 2750 article-title: Exploring a new biodiversity frontier: Subterranean ants in northern Australia publication-title: Biodiversity and Conservation – volume: 186 start-page: 107 year: 2015 end-page: 114 article-title: Use of restored habitat by rainforest birds is limited by spatial context and species’ functional traits but not by their predicted climate sensitivity publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 24 start-page: 445 year: 2008 end-page: 455 article-title: Ant community structure along an extended rain forest–savanna gradient in tropical Australia publication-title: Journal of Tropical Ecology – volume: 73 start-page: 181 year: 1998 end-page: 201 article-title: The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators publication-title: Biological Reviews – volume: 23 start-page: 519 year: 2015 end-page: 520 article-title: Indicators of success should be sensitive to compositional failures: Reply to Suganuma and Durigan publication-title: Restoration Ecology – volume: 320 start-page: 1458 year: 2008 end-page: 1460 article-title: Beyond deforestation: Restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands publication-title: Science – volume: 143 start-page: 677 year: 2009 end-page: 687 article-title: Revegetation of farmland restores function and composition of epigaeic beetle assemblages publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 11 start-page: 177 year: 2007 end-page: 186 article-title: The use of ants and other soil and litter arthropods as bio‐indicators of the impacts of rainforest clearing and subsequent land use publication-title: Journal of Insect Conservation – volume: 38 start-page: 287 year: 2006 end-page: 301 article-title: The future of tropical forest species publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 23 start-page: 238 year: 2015 end-page: 251 article-title: Indicators of restoration success in riparian tropical forests using multiple reference ecosystems publication-title: Restoration Ecology – year: 2010 – volume: 4 start-page: S20 year: 2003 end-page: S28 article-title: Using soil and litter arthropods to assess the state of rainforest restoration publication-title: Ecological Management & Restoration – volume: 197 start-page: 98 year: 2016 end-page: 107 article-title: Biodiversity consequences of land‐cover change in the Amazon: A multi‐scale assessment using ant communities publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 22 start-page: 15 year: 1995 end-page: 29 article-title: A classification of Australian ant communities, based on functional groups which parallel plant life‐forms in relation to stress and disturbance publication-title: Journal of Biogeography – volume: 25 start-page: 1011 year: 2016 end-page: 1035 – volume: 34 start-page: 159 year: 2013 end-page: 167 article-title: Comparison of bird community indices for riparian restoration planning and monitoring publication-title: Ecological Indicators – volume: 2 start-page: 291 year: 2004 end-page: 298 article-title: Ants show the way Down Under: Invertebrates as bioindicators in land management publication-title: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment – volume: 8 start-page: 328 year: 2000 end-page: 338 article-title: Forest regeneration in a chronosequence of tropical abandoned pastures: implications for restoration ecology publication-title: Restoration Ecology – volume: 3 start-page: 61 year: 1999 end-page: 64 article-title: My bioindicator or yours? Making the selection publication-title: Journal of Insect Conservation – year: 2006 – volume: 154 start-page: 409 year: 2001 end-page: 430 article-title: Restoration pathways for rain forest in southwest Sri Lanka: A review of concepts and models publication-title: Forest Ecology and Management – volume: 29 start-page: 122 year: 2015 end-page: 132 article-title: Evaluating multispecies landscape connectivity in a threatened tropical mammal community publication-title: Conservation Biology – volume: 264 start-page: 228 year: 2012 end-page: 237 article-title: Comparing above‐ground biomass among forest types in the Wet Tropics: Small stems and plantation types matter in carbon accounting publication-title: Forest Ecology and Management – volume: 28 start-page: 444 year: 2003 end-page: 464 article-title: Responses of ants to disturbance in Australia, with particular reference to functional groups publication-title: Austral Ecology – volume: 342 start-page: 850 year: 2013 end-page: 853 article-title: High‐resolution global maps of 21st‐century forest cover change publication-title: Science – start-page: 198 year: 2002 end-page: 204 – ident: e_1_2_8_12_1 doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00512-6 – ident: e_1_2_8_20_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1155365 – ident: e_1_2_8_23_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1008891901953 – ident: e_1_2_8_28_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.016 – ident: e_1_2_8_32_1 doi: 10.1007/PL00008824 – ident: e_1_2_8_40_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1008857214743 – ident: e_1_2_8_61_1 doi: 10.1111/rec.12254 – ident: e_1_2_8_14_1 doi: 10.1111/rec.12312 – ident: e_1_2_8_63_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.05.027 – ident: e_1_2_8_30_1 doi: 10.2307/1935016 – ident: e_1_2_8_64_1 doi: 10.1007/s10531-007-9274-3 – ident: e_1_2_8_5_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1017202329114 – ident: e_1_2_8_37_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2010.00506.x – ident: e_1_2_8_25_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.005 – ident: e_1_2_8_15_1 doi: 10.1111/cobi.12337 – ident: e_1_2_8_26_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.005 – ident: e_1_2_8_13_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.012 – ident: e_1_2_8_4_1 doi: 10.2307/2846070 – ident: e_1_2_8_19_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98229.x – ident: e_1_2_8_59_1 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.016 – ident: e_1_2_8_49_1 doi: 10.1002/16-0108.1 – ident: e_1_2_8_16_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1018422807610 – ident: e_1_2_8_39_1 doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00109-9 – ident: e_1_2_8_44_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.07.006 – ident: e_1_2_8_48_1 doi: 10.1007/s10021-010-9394-6 – volume-title: Monitoring revegetation projects in rainforest landscapes. Toolkit version 3 year: 2010 ident: e_1_2_8_38_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_41_1 doi: 10.2307/1941776 – ident: e_1_2_8_27_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00055827 – ident: e_1_2_8_69_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00154.x – start-page: 214 volume-title: PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: Guide to software and statistical methods year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_8_11_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_9_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1442-8903.4.s.2.x – volume-title: PRIMER v6: User manual/tutorial year: 2006 ident: e_1_2_8_21_1 – start-page: 25 volume-title: Ants: Standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_8_6_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_18_1 doi: 10.7882/FS.2004.021 – ident: e_1_2_8_7_1 doi: 10.1007/s10531-010-9874-1 – volume: 16 start-page: 347 year: 1990 ident: e_1_2_8_3_1 article-title: The use of ant communities to evaluate change in Australian terrestrial ecosystems: A review and a recipe publication-title: Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia – ident: e_1_2_8_53_1 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.06.012 – ident: e_1_2_8_10_1 doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0292:ASTWDU]2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_8_43_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.04054.x – ident: e_1_2_8_46_1 doi: 10.1007/s10531-012-0271-9 – volume: 3 start-page: 8 year: 2010 ident: e_1_2_8_34_1 article-title: Bioindicators: Using Organisms to Measure Environmental Impacts publication-title: Nature Education Knowledge – ident: e_1_2_8_45_1 doi: 10.1111/emr.12068 – ident: e_1_2_8_55_1 doi: 10.1007/s10841-006-9034-9 – ident: e_1_2_8_65_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.005 – ident: e_1_2_8_8_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00704.x – ident: e_1_2_8_31_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01301.x – ident: e_1_2_8_60_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.72023.x – ident: e_1_2_8_66_1 doi: 10.1111/rec.12168 – start-page: 198 volume-title: Indicator species analysis. Analysis of ecological communities year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_8_50_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_54_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2009.00056.x – ident: e_1_2_8_56_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1442-8903.4.s.3.x – ident: e_1_2_8_29_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1244693 – ident: e_1_2_8_36_1 doi: 10.1017/S0266467408005166 – ident: e_1_2_8_67_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.008 – ident: e_1_2_8_24_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_52_1 – volume: 17 start-page: 133 year: 2012 ident: e_1_2_8_22_1 article-title: The little things that run the world revisited: A review of ant‐mediated ecosystem services and disservices (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) publication-title: Myrmecological News – ident: e_1_2_8_68_1 doi: 10.1071/WR14082 – ident: e_1_2_8_51_1 doi: 10.1017/S000632319700515X – ident: e_1_2_8_17_1 doi: 10.1007/s10531-016-1111-0 – ident: e_1_2_8_35_1 doi: 10.1111/cobi.12730 – ident: e_1_2_8_70_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.05.004 – ident: e_1_2_8_58_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.01943.x – ident: e_1_2_8_62_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00072.x – ident: e_1_2_8_57_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.601 – ident: e_1_2_8_42_1 doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(94)90325-5 – ident: e_1_2_8_47_1 doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00354-6 – ident: e_1_2_8_2_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80048.x – ident: e_1_2_8_33_1 doi: 10.1007/s10530-007-9194-x |
SSID | ssj0000602407 |
Score | 2.3202684 |
Snippet | Ecosystem restoration can help reverse biodiversity loss, but whether faunal communities of forests undergoing restoration converge with those of primary... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 8442 |
SubjectTerms | Age Ants Biodiversity Biodiversity loss Canopies Communities Convergence Ecological function Ecology Ecosystem restoration Ecosystems Environmental restoration Forest management Forests functional groups Grasslands habitat condition Indicator species Indicators Original Research Plants (botany) Principal components analysis rainforest restoration Rainforests Sampling succession Tropical environments Vegetation |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3di9QwEA-6h-CL-G31lCg--FKvm4829UXOo8speIh4cG-lSSZ4IO267aH35_ifmknTrsupb4GkmYZJJr9kJr8h5GWpNc-lZGnDNPcHFC5SLblLTeF04ywHpvGB88eT_PhUfDiTZ_HCrY9hlZNNDIbadgbvyA_Q3aNEqZby7fp7ilmj0LsaU2hcJ3veBCu1IHvvqpNPn-dblixHDq9iohTK2AEY4K-9DWa7G9EVdHk1SPJP8Bp2n9VtcivCRno46vkOuQbtXXKjCpTTl_fIr8N26GnTUzCTMaPojDZ4pO5p5yhmgvD41Mumm5BMJmjkDY0PRIZLGuLPw1NMoE1rqUeG1G5DirCTpqVeEF2N_byfBGAJfnqB4Zvt7Qn9AQMdNt363PT3yemq-nJ0nMbkC6kRgrNU5A0YXRYWMvCLPgPrBLNF7kpnlFFlI4Eb6xjTHjIYbiRYxnOlbGEyU2SWPyCLtmvhEaGF13m2dEhF59EXV9ph4JjMjBGFUwoS8mrSRG0iMzkmyPhWj5zKrEal1ai0hLyYm65HOo6_Ndqf1FnHFdnX2_mTkOdztV9L6CBpWuguQht_ukLPbEIejtqfpbDSgyuRLxNS7MyLuQHydO_WtOdfA1-3zIXyQM8PM8ygf_94XR1VHAuP_z-CJ-QmQ3QRYgr3yWLYXMBTj40G_SwugN-IMhSW priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Wiley Online Library Open Access dbid: 24P link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1baxUxEA6lIvgi3l2tEsUHX9buyWU3q0-lnEMVFB8s9G3JZYKFsqec3aL9Of5TZ7KX46EKvgUyyewymeRLMvOFsTe1c7LUWuRWOIkbFKlyp2XMfRWdjUGCcJTg_PlLeXKqPp3psz32YcqFGfgh5gM38ow0X5ODW9cdbklDwYN8h5Mpzr-3KLWW4vmE-jofsBQl0XdRujQxriOK1GZiFirE4dx6dz26ATJvxkr-iWHTIrS6x-6O6JEfDea-z_agfcBuLxPz9PVD9uuo7TtuOw5-mtM43Ul72ll3fB05PQiBMBV18016UyYZ5j0f80T6a57C0FNGJnDbBo4AkYdtZBF1YluOivhq6OfjpIBK8BMVpjbbQxT-A3reb9aX5757xE5Xy2_HJ_n4BkPulZIiV6UF7-oqQAHo-wWEqESoylhHb7yprQbpQxTCIXLw0msIQpbGhMoXviqCfMz223ULTxmv0PTFIhIjHYIwaVyk-DFdeK-qaAxk7O1kicaPBOX0TsZFM1Ari4aM1pDRMvZ6Fr0cWDn-JnQwmbMZHbNr6NbQqNosdMZezdXoUnRPYltYXyUZ3GTRBW3GngzWn7WIGjGWKhcZq3bGxSxAdN27Ne3590TbrUtlEO_hb6YR9O8Pb5bHS0mFZ_8v-pzdEQQ4UpjhAdvvN1fwAuFS714mt_gNw9QU5g priority: 102 providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
Title | Ants as ecological indicators of rainforest restoration: Community convergence and the development of an Ant Forest Indicator Index in the Australian wet tropics |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fece3.2992 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29075461 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1953849815 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1957470364 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5648658 |
Volume | 7 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwdV3dS9xAEF-sUuhLqf1M1WNb-tCX2Nx-JBuhFCs5bEGR0gPfQvYLBcnZS0Tvz-l_6swmOT3Ut0B2d5LM7OxvsrO_IeRLrjVPpWRxxTSHAIWLWEvuY5N5XXnLHdN4wPnoOD2cit-n8nSNDDU2-w_YPBraYT2p6fxi9-bf4gdM-O89geg3ZxzfBbcKnngDFqQMCxkc9Si_c8hI5IUHp5F7HfCkVAPH0P3eyAsMoaIU6Xh1kXqAPB8mUN4HtmFlmrwiL3tISfc7G9gka65-TZ4XgY568Yb836_bhlYNdWZwdBQ3qg2G2w2deYpVIgC7gmw6D4Vmgrb2aH94pF3QkJsejmk6WtWWAmqk9i7dCAepagqC6KQb59cgAK_cDQgMfe7-rNBr19J2Prs8N81bMp0Ufw8O474wQ2yE4CwWaeWMzjPrEgcOIXHWC2az1OfeKKPySjpurGdMA5ww3EhnGU-VsplJTJZY_o6s17PafSA0A3tIxh5p6gCZcaU9JpXJxBiReaVcRL4OmihNz1qOxTMuyo5vmZWovxL1F5HPy6aXHVXHY422B3WWg7GVuJWoRK7GMiKflrdhnuHmSVW72VVoA5EX7tpG5H2n_aWUwWwikq3YxbIBcniv3qnPzwKXt0yFAhAIrxks6OkHL4uDguPFxyfFb5EXDEFHSDXcJuvt_MrtAGRq9Yg8Y-JkRDZ-Fscnf0bhx8MoTJJbJE4Z6w |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3bbtQwEB2VrRC8IO4EChgEEi-hWdtJHCSEStnVLm1XCLVS30Lii6hUJdtNqrKfww_wjXicy7Iq8Na3SHE8sWY8PvaMzwC8SvKcRWFI_YzmzG5QGPfzkBlfxibPjGKa5njB-WAWTY745-PweAN-dXdhMK2y84nOUatS4hn5NoZ7BE_EMPwwP_OxahRGV7sSGo1Z7Onlhd2yVe-nn6x-X1M6Hh3uTvy2qoAvOWfU51GmZZ7ESgfaWnOgleFUxZFJjBRSJFmomVSG0tyuhZLJUCvKIiFULAMZB4rZfq_BJmdRQAew-XE0-_K1P9UJIuQMizsKo4Bua6nZW-vz6frCdwnNXk7K_BMsu9VufBtutTCV7DR2dQc2dHEXro8cxfXyHvzcKeqKZBXRsnOeBIPfErfwFSkNwcoTFg9b2WThitc4C3hH2gsp9ZK4fHd39VOTrFDEIlGiVilM2ElWECuIjJt-pp0AfNI_rED3zeq0hlzomtSLcn4iq_twdCVqeQCDoiz0IyCxtbFgaJD6zqI9JnKDiWphICWPjRDagzedJlLZMqFjQY7TtOFwpikqLUWlefCybzpv6D_-1mirU2faeoAqXdmrBy_613buYkAmK3R57trY3RxGgj142Gi_l0ITC-Z4NPQgXrOLvgHygq-_KU6-O37wMOLCAks7TGdB__7xdLQ7Yvjw-P8jeA43JocH--n-dLb3BG5SRDYun3ELBvXiXD-1uKzOn7WTgcC3q55_vwEoFlKf |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3bbtNAEB2VVCBeEHcMBRYEEi9unF1fkRAqbaKGQlQhKvXN2HtRK1V2iF2VfA6_wdcxs76EqMBb3yx5sxNrZmfP7MyeAXiV5LkIg4C7Gc8FBijCd_NAGFdGJs-MEprndMH58yzcP_I_HgfHG_CruwtDZZWdT7SOWpWSzsiHlO6J_SQeBUPTlkUc7k3ez7-71EGKMq1dO43GRA708gLDt-rddA91_Zrzyfjr7r7bdhhwpe8L7vphpmWeREp7Gi3b08r4XEWhSYyMZZxkgRZSGc5z3BelkIFWXIRxrCLpychTAue9BpsRRUUD2Pwwnh1-6U94vJD4w6KOzsjjQy212Eb_z9c3wUvI9nKB5p_A2e58k9twq4WsbKexsTuwoYu7cH1s6a6X9-DnTlFXLKuYlp0jZZQIlxTOV6w0jLpQIDZG2WxhG9lYa3jL2ssp9ZLZ2nd7DVSzrFAMUSlTq3ImmiQrGApik2aeaSeAnvQPFGh_szq5YRe6ZvWinJ_K6j4cXYlaHsCgKAv9CFiE9uaNDNHgIfITcW6oaC3wpPQjE8fagTedJlLZsqJTc46ztOFz5ikpLSWlOfCyHzpvqED-NmirU2faeoMqXdmuAy_617iOKTmTFbo8t2MwsqOssAMPG-33UniCwM4PRw5Ea3bRDyCO8PU3xemJ5QoPQj9GkImfaS3o3388He-OBT08_v8XPIcbuO7ST9PZwRO4yQnk2NLGLRjUi3P9FCFanT9r1wKDb1e9_H4Dh5RW1A |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ants+as+ecological+indicators+of+rainforest+restoration%3A+Community+convergence+and+the+development+of+an+Ant+Forest+Indicator+Index+in+the+Australian+wet+tropics&rft.jtitle=Ecology+and+evolution&rft.au=Lawes%2C+Michael+J&rft.au=Moore%2C+Anthony+M&rft.au=Andersen%2C+Alan+N&rft.au=Preece%2C+Noel+D&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=8442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fece3.2992&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F29075461&rft.externalDocID=29075461 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2045-7758&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2045-7758&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2045-7758&client=summon |