Long‐term data from a phase 3 study of radotinib versus imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed, chronic myeloid leukaemia in the chronic phase (RERISE)

Summary In the phase 3 study RERISE, patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase demonstrated significantly faster and higher rates of major molecular response (MMR) with twice‐daily radotinib 300 mg (n = 79) or 400 mg (n = 81) than with once‐daily imatinib 400 mg (n = 8...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of haematology Vol. 189; no. 2; pp. 303 - 312
Main Authors Do, Young Rok, Kwak, Jae‐Yong, Kim, Jeong A., Kim, Hyeoung Joon, Chung, Joo Seop, Shin, Ho‐Jin, Kim, Sung‐Hyun, Bunworasate, Udomsak, Choi, Chul Won, Zang, Dae Young, Oh, Suk Joong, Jootar, Saengsuree, Reksodiputro, Ary Harryanto, Lee, Won Sik, Mun, Yeung‐Chul, Kong, Jee Hyun, Caguioa, Priscilla B., Kim, Hawk, Park, Jinny, Kim, Dong‐Wook
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2020
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary In the phase 3 study RERISE, patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase demonstrated significantly faster and higher rates of major molecular response (MMR) with twice‐daily radotinib 300 mg (n = 79) or 400 mg (n = 81) than with once‐daily imatinib 400 mg (n = 81) after 12 months. With ≥48 months’ follow‐up, MMR was higher with radotinib 300 mg (86%) or 400 mg (83%) than with imatinib (75%). Among patients with BCR‐ABL1 ≤ 10% at three months, MMR and molecular response 4·5 (MR4·5) were achieved within 48 months by more radotinib‐treated patients (300 mg: 84% and 52%, respectively; 400 mg: 74% and 44%, respectively) than imatinib‐treated patients (71% and 44%, respectively). Estimated overall and progression‐free survival rates at 48 months were not significantly different between imatinib (94% and 94%, respectively) and radotinib 300 mg (99% and 97%, respectively) or 400 mg (95% and 93%, respectively). The treatment failure rate was significantly higher with imatinib (19%) than with radotinib 300 mg (6%; P = 0·0197) or 400 mg (5%; P = 0·0072). Safety profiles were consistent with previous reports; most adverse events occurred within 12 months. Radotinib continues to demonstrate robust, deep molecular responses, suggesting that treatment‐free remission may be attainable.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1048
1365-2141
DOI:10.1111/bjh.16381