Decitabine and vorinostat with FLAG chemotherapy in pediatric relapsed/refractory AML: Report from the therapeutic advances in childhood leukemia and lymphoma (TACL) consortium

Survival outcomes for relapsed/refractory pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) remain dismal. Epigenetic changes can result in gene expression alterations which are thought to contribute to both leukemogenesis and chemotherapy resistance. We report results from a phase I trial with a dose expa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of hematology Vol. 97; no. 5; pp. 613 - 622
Main Authors Pommert, Lauren, Schafer, Eric S., Malvar, Jemily, Gossai, Nathan, Florendo, Ellynore, Pulakanti, Kirthi, Heimbruch, Katelyn, Stelloh, Cary, Chi, Yueh‐Yun, Sposto, Richard, Rao, Sridhar, Huynh, Van Thu, Brown, Patrick, Chang, Bill H., Colace, Susan I., Hermiston, Michelle L., Heym, Kenneth, Hutchinson, Raymond J., Kaplan, Joel A., Mody, Rajen, O'Brien, Tracey A., Place, Andrew E., Shaw, Peter H., Ziegler, David S., Wayne, Alan, Bhojwani, Deepa, Burke, Michael J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.05.2022
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Survival outcomes for relapsed/refractory pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) remain dismal. Epigenetic changes can result in gene expression alterations which are thought to contribute to both leukemogenesis and chemotherapy resistance. We report results from a phase I trial with a dose expansion cohort investigating decitabine and vorinostat in combination with fludarabine, cytarabine, and G‐CSF (FLAG) in pediatric patients with R/R AML [NCT02412475]. Thirty‐seven patients enrolled with a median age at enrollment of 8.4 (range, 1–20) years. There were no dose limiting toxicities among the enrolled patients, including two patients with Down syndrome. The recommended phase 2 dose of decitabine in combination with vorinostat and FLAG was 10 mg/m2. The expanded cohort design allowed for an efficacy evaluation and the overall response rate among 35 evaluable patients was 54% (16 complete response (CR) and 3 complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi)). Ninety percent of responders achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (<0.1%) by centralized flow cytometry and 84% (n = 16) successfully proceeded to hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Two‐year overall survival was 75.6% [95%CI: 47.3%, 90.1%] for MRD‐negative patients vs. 17.9% [95%CI: 4.4%, 38.8%] for those with residual disease (p < .001). Twelve subjects (34%) had known epigenetic alterations with 8 (67%) achieving a CR, 7 (88%) of whom were MRD negative. Correlative pharmacodynamics demonstrated the biologic activity of decitabine and vorinostat and identified specific gene enrichment signatures in nonresponding patients. Overall, this therapy was well‐tolerated, biologically active, and effective in pediatric patients with R/R AML, particularly those with epigenetic alterations.
Bibliography:Deepa Bhojwani and Michael J. Burke shared last authorship.
Funding information
Lauren Pommert and Eric S. Schafer shared first authorship.
Bear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation; Children's Cancer Research Fund; Higgins Charitable Foundation; Midwest Athletes Against Childhood Cancer (MACC) Fund; National Cancer Institute, Grant/Award Number: P30CA014089; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health, Grant/Award Number: T32HL007209; The Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center Advancing Healthier Wisconsin Partnership Program
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Authorship Contributions
Shared last author
Shared 1st author
LP processed the biology samples, performed the correlative experiments, analyzed the correlative and clinical data, and wrote the manuscript. ES analyzed the clinical data and contributed to the manuscript. EF was the study coordinator. JM and YC analyzed the clinical data and reviewed and edited the manuscript. SR and LP designed the correlative studies, SR and KP analyzed the correlative data and contributed to the manuscript. CS performed the correlative experiments and KH analyzed the correlative data. MJB designed the study; MJB and DB chaired the clinical trial, analyzed the clinical data, edited and reviewed the manuscript. LP, ESS, JM, NG, EF, YYC, SR, VTH, DB, and MJB comprised the study committee and participated in study development. All other authors enrolled patients on the clinical trial, edited, and reviewed the manuscript.
ISSN:0361-8609
1096-8652
1096-8652
DOI:10.1002/ajh.26510