An Acute Randomized Controlled Trial of Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Essential Tremor

• Published in: Neuromodulation (Malden, Mass.) Vol. 22; no. 5; pp. 537 - 545
• Main Authors: Pahwa, Rajesh, Dhall, Rohit, Ostrem, Jill, Gwinn, Ryder, Lyons, Kelly, Ro, Susie, Dietiker, Cameron, Luthra, Nijee, Chidester, Paula, Hamner, Samuel, Ross, Erika, Delp, Scott
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Limited 01.07.2019; John Wiley and Sons Inc
• Subjects: Activities of daily living; Activities of Daily Living - psychology; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clinical Trials; Essential tremor; Essential Tremor - diagnosis; Essential Tremor - physiopathology; Essential Tremor - therapy; Female; Hand; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; movement disorders; neurostimulation; noninvasive stimulation; Patients; PERIPHERAL NERVE STIMULATION; Peripheral nerves; Peripheral Nerves - physiology; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - instrumentation; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods; Tremor; Wrist; Wrist - innervation; Wrist - physiology; tremor; movement disorders; Essential tremor; peripheral nerve stimulation; neurostimulation; noninvasive stimulation
• ISSN: 1094-7159; 1525-1403; 1525-1403
• DOI: 10.1111/ner.12930

Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a wrist‐worn peripheral nerve stimulation device in patients with essential tremor (ET) in a single in‐office session. Methods This was a randomized controlled study of 77 ET patients who received either treatment stimulation (N = 40) or sham stimulation (N = 37) on the wrist of the hand with more severe tremor. Tremor was evaluated before and immediately after the end of a single 40‐minute stimulation session. The primary endpoint compared spiral drawing in the stimulated hand using the Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS) Archimedes spiral scores in treatment and sham groups. Additional endpoints included TETRAS upper limb tremor scores, subject‐rated tasks from the Bain and Findley activities of daily living (ADL) scale before and after stimulation as well as clinical global impression‐improvement (CGI‐I) rating after stimulation. Results Subjects who received peripheral nerve stimulation did not show significantly larger improvement in the Archimedes spiral task compared to sham but did show significantly greater improvement in upper limb TETRAS tremor scores (p = 0.017) compared to sham. Subject‐rated improvements in ADLs were significantly greater with treatment (49% reduction) than with sham (27% reduction; p = 0.001). A greater percentage of ET patients (88%) reported improvement in the stimulation group as compared to the sham group (62%) according to CGI‐I ratings (p = 0.019). No significant adverse events were reported; 3% of subjects experienced mild adverse events. Conclusions Peripheral nerve stimulation in ET may provide a safe, well‐tolerated, and effective treatment for transient relief of hand tremor symptoms.