A National Snapshot of Satisfaction with Breast Cancer Procedures

Purpose Women with early-stage breast cancer face the complex decision to undergo one of three equally effective oncologic surgical strategies: breast-conservation surgery with radiation (BCS), mastectomy, or mastectomy with breast reconstruction. With comparable oncologic outcomes and survival rate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of surgical oncology Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 361 - 369
Main Authors Atisha, Dunya M., Rushing, Christel N., Samsa, Gregory P., Locklear, Tracie D., Cox, Charlie E., Shelley Hwang, E., Zenn, Michael R., Pusic, Andrea L., Abernethy, Amy P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston Springer US 01.02.2015
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Purpose Women with early-stage breast cancer face the complex decision to undergo one of three equally effective oncologic surgical strategies: breast-conservation surgery with radiation (BCS), mastectomy, or mastectomy with breast reconstruction. With comparable oncologic outcomes and survival rates, evaluations of satisfaction with these procedures are needed to facilitate the decision-making process and to optimize long-term health. Methods Women recruited from the Army of Women with a history of breast cancer surgery took electronically administered surgery-specific surveys, including the BREAST-Q© and a background survey evaluating patient-, disease-, and procedure-specific factors. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used to evaluate the effect of procedure type on breast satisfaction scores. Results Overall, 7,619 women completed the questionnaires. Linear regression revealed that women who underwent abdominal flap, or buttock or thigh flap reconstruction reported the highest breast satisfaction score, scoring an average of 5.6 points and 14.4 points higher than BCS, respectively ( p  < 0.0001 and p  = 0.027, respectively). No difference in satisfaction was observed in women who underwent latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction compared with those who underwent BCS. Women who underwent implant reconstruction reported scores 8.6 points lower than BCS ( p  < 0.0001). Those with mastectomies without reconstruction or complex surgical histories scored, on average, 10 points lower than BCS ( p  < 0.0001). Conclusion Women who underwent autologous tissue reconstruction reported the highest breast satisfaction, while women undergoing mastectomy without reconstruction reported the lowest satisfaction. These findings emphasize the value of patient-reported outcome measures as an important guide to decision making in breast surgery and underscore the importance of multidisciplinary participation early in the surgical decision-making process.
AbstractList Women with early-stage breast cancer face the complex decision to undergo one of three equally effective oncologic surgical strategies: breast-conservation surgery with radiation (BCS), mastectomy, or mastectomy with breast reconstruction. With comparable oncologic outcomes and survival rates, evaluations of satisfaction with these procedures are needed to facilitate the decision-making process and to optimize long-term health. Women recruited from the Army of Women with a history of breast cancer surgery took electronically administered surgery-specific surveys, including the BREAST-Q© and a background survey evaluating patient-, disease-, and procedure-specific factors. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used to evaluate the effect of procedure type on breast satisfaction scores. Overall, 7,619 women completed the questionnaires. Linear regression revealed that women who underwent abdominal flap, or buttock or thigh flap reconstruction reported the highest breast satisfaction score, scoring an average of 5.6 points and 14.4 points higher than BCS, respectively (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.027, respectively). No difference in satisfaction was observed in women who underwent latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction compared with those who underwent BCS. Women who underwent implant reconstruction reported scores 8.6 points lower than BCS (p < 0.0001). Those with mastectomies without reconstruction or complex surgical histories scored, on average, 10 points lower than BCS (p < 0.0001). Women who underwent autologous tissue reconstruction reported the highest breast satisfaction, while women undergoing mastectomy without reconstruction reported the lowest satisfaction. These findings emphasize the value of patient-reported outcome measures as an important guide to decision making in breast surgery and underscore the importance of multidisciplinary participation early in the surgical decision-making process.
Women with early-stage breast cancer face the complex decision to undergo one of three equally effective oncologic surgical strategies: breast-conservation surgery with radiation (BCS), mastectomy, or mastectomy with breast reconstruction. With comparable oncologic outcomes and survival rates, evaluations of satisfaction with these procedures are needed to facilitate the decision-making process and to optimize long-term health. Women recruited from the Army of Women with a history of breast cancer surgery took electronically administered surgery-specific surveys, including the BREAST-Q© and a background survey evaluating patient-, disease-, and procedure-specific factors. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used to evaluate the effect of procedure type on breast satisfaction scores. Overall, 7,619 women completed the questionnaires. Linear regression revealed that women who underwent abdominal flap, or buttock or thigh flap reconstruction reported the highest breast satisfaction score, scoring an average of 5.6 points and 14.4 points higher than BCS, respectively (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.027, respectively). No difference in satisfaction was observed in women who underwent latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction compared with those who underwent BCS. Women who underwent implant reconstruction reported scores 8.6 points lower than BCS (p < 0.0001). Those with mastectomies without reconstruction or complex surgical histories scored, on average, 10 points lower than BCS (p < 0.0001). Women who underwent autologous tissue reconstruction reported the highest breast satisfaction, while women undergoing mastectomy without reconstruction reported the lowest satisfaction. These findings emphasize the value of patient-reported outcome measures as an important guide to decision making in breast surgery and underscore the importance of multidisciplinary participation early in the surgical decision-making process.
Purpose Women with early-stage breast cancer face the complex decision to undergo one of three equally effective oncologic surgical strategies: breast-conservation surgery with radiation (BCS), mastectomy, or mastectomy with breast reconstruction. With comparable oncologic outcomes and survival rates, evaluations of satisfaction with these procedures are needed to facilitate the decision-making process and to optimize long-term health. Methods Women recruited from the Army of Women with a history of breast cancer surgery took electronically administered surgery-specific surveys, including the BREAST-Q© and a background survey evaluating patient-, disease-, and procedure-specific factors. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used to evaluate the effect of procedure type on breast satisfaction scores. Results Overall, 7,619 women completed the questionnaires. Linear regression revealed that women who underwent abdominal flap, or buttock or thigh flap reconstruction reported the highest breast satisfaction score, scoring an average of 5.6 points and 14.4 points higher than BCS, respectively ( p  < 0.0001 and p  = 0.027, respectively). No difference in satisfaction was observed in women who underwent latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction compared with those who underwent BCS. Women who underwent implant reconstruction reported scores 8.6 points lower than BCS ( p  < 0.0001). Those with mastectomies without reconstruction or complex surgical histories scored, on average, 10 points lower than BCS ( p  < 0.0001). Conclusion Women who underwent autologous tissue reconstruction reported the highest breast satisfaction, while women undergoing mastectomy without reconstruction reported the lowest satisfaction. These findings emphasize the value of patient-reported outcome measures as an important guide to decision making in breast surgery and underscore the importance of multidisciplinary participation early in the surgical decision-making process.
PURPOSEWomen with early-stage breast cancer face the complex decision to undergo one of three equally effective oncologic surgical strategies: breast-conservation surgery with radiation (BCS), mastectomy, or mastectomy with breast reconstruction. With comparable oncologic outcomes and survival rates, evaluations of satisfaction with these procedures are needed to facilitate the decision-making process and to optimize long-term health.METHODSWomen recruited from the Army of Women with a history of breast cancer surgery took electronically administered surgery-specific surveys, including the BREAST-Q© and a background survey evaluating patient-, disease-, and procedure-specific factors. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used to evaluate the effect of procedure type on breast satisfaction scores.RESULTSOverall, 7,619 women completed the questionnaires. Linear regression revealed that women who underwent abdominal flap, or buttock or thigh flap reconstruction reported the highest breast satisfaction score, scoring an average of 5.6 points and 14.4 points higher than BCS, respectively (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.027, respectively). No difference in satisfaction was observed in women who underwent latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction compared with those who underwent BCS. Women who underwent implant reconstruction reported scores 8.6 points lower than BCS (p < 0.0001). Those with mastectomies without reconstruction or complex surgical histories scored, on average, 10 points lower than BCS (p < 0.0001).CONCLUSIONWomen who underwent autologous tissue reconstruction reported the highest breast satisfaction, while women undergoing mastectomy without reconstruction reported the lowest satisfaction. These findings emphasize the value of patient-reported outcome measures as an important guide to decision making in breast surgery and underscore the importance of multidisciplinary participation early in the surgical decision-making process.
Author Samsa, Gregory P.
Cox, Charlie E.
Rushing, Christel N.
Abernethy, Amy P.
Zenn, Michael R.
Atisha, Dunya M.
Shelley Hwang, E.
Locklear, Tracie D.
Pusic, Andrea L.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Dunya M.
  surname: Atisha
  fullname: Atisha, Dunya M.
  email: datisha@health.usf.edu
  organization: Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Christel N.
  surname: Rushing
  fullname: Rushing, Christel N.
  organization: Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Gregory P.
  surname: Samsa
  fullname: Samsa, Gregory P.
  organization: Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Tracie D.
  surname: Locklear
  fullname: Locklear, Tracie D.
  organization: Center for Learning Health Care, Duke University Medical Center
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Charlie E.
  surname: Cox
  fullname: Cox, Charlie E.
  organization: Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida
– sequence: 6
  givenname: E.
  surname: Shelley Hwang
  fullname: Shelley Hwang, E.
  organization: Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Michael R.
  surname: Zenn
  fullname: Zenn, Michael R.
  organization: Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Andrea L.
  surname: Pusic
  fullname: Pusic, Andrea L.
  organization: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Amy P.
  surname: Abernethy
  fullname: Abernethy, Amy P.
  organization: Center for Learning Health Care, Duke University Medical Center, Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25465378$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kE1LAzEQhoNU7If-AC-y4MXLaiabZLPHWvyCokL1HNIka7e0m5rsIv57s2wVETzNMPPMG_KM0aB2tUXoFPAlEMquAmCa0RQDTSmhPC0O0AhYnFAuYBB7zEVaEM6GaBzCGmPIM8yO0JAwylmWixGaTpNH1VSuVptkUatdWLkmcWWyiMNQKt2tko-qWSXX3qrQJDNVa-uTZ--0Na234RgdlmoT7Mm-TtDr7c3L7D6dP909zKbzVFNKmlRrMHZJcmFAiZJoLDArheFQlDjPhcC20KQEIIbmGjIrcmPA8EJZxmgBkE3QRZ-78-69taGR2ypou9mo2ro2SOCMZIXAFEf0_A-6dq2PX-woyiLHGIsU9JT2LgRvS7nz1Vb5TwlYdn5l71dGv7LzK4t4c7ZPbpdba34uvoVGgPRAiKv6zfpfT_-b-gWuFYU7
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1097_01_prs_0000479935_92904_a3
crossref_primary_10_1097_SAP_0000000000000675
crossref_primary_10_1093_jscr_rjad729
crossref_primary_10_1111_tbj_12707
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jss_2015_04_011
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10215066
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0153704
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000005616
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00238_022_01950_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2023_04_011
crossref_primary_10_1111_jmwh_13012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2020_12_019
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2023_01_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semradonc_2015_09_007
crossref_primary_10_17116_plast_hirurgia202402151
crossref_primary_10_1097_GOX_0000000000005176
crossref_primary_10_1097_SAP_0000000000001079
crossref_primary_10_1097_SAP_0000000000002324
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12631_016_0052_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_critrevonc_2018_11_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2016_08_013
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2045_8122
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_24755
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_015_4759_x
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000003845
crossref_primary_10_1097_GOX_0000000000003704
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2020_06_066
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_018_6729_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2022_02_032
crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_31395
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_020_08731_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_020_05964_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2018_03_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cps_2017_08_011
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_020_09448_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breastdis_2015_04_026
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_018_6479_5
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_022_12624_8
crossref_primary_10_1111_tbj_12888
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breast_2017_02_015
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000008822
crossref_primary_10_1200_OP_20_00780
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000004108
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breastdis_2015_10_012
crossref_primary_10_1097_SAP_0000000000001427
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2018_06_009
crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_2016_69_9561
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cps_2017_08_007
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_016_5312_2
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_019_07756_3
crossref_primary_10_1159_000496398
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40134_015_0109_9
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamasurg_2022_7625
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_019_08195_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2017_01_006
crossref_primary_10_1634_theoncologist_2019_0355
crossref_primary_10_1097_GOX_0000000000001904
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000002855
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000006535
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000006810
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2018_06_011
crossref_primary_10_1200_JOP_18_00796
crossref_primary_10_1111_ans_18277
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2020_02_060
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breast_2017_06_006
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000006010
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11136_017_1740_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2018_05_011
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2020_042235
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2017_06_017
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2019_04_006
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_022_12477_1
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2022_065110
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000003236
crossref_primary_10_1080_2000656X_2018_1562459
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_021_10377_4
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000008521
crossref_primary_10_1111_tbj_12980
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000006066
crossref_primary_10_1097_GOX_0000000000005374
crossref_primary_10_1097_SAP_0000000000002640
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2020_08_093
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cireng_2020_03_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2023_04_010
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000003914
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_022_12619_5
crossref_primary_10_1097_SAP_0000000000003570
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_016_3966_x
crossref_primary_10_1097_GOX_0000000000003112
crossref_primary_10_1097_SAP_0000000000001030
crossref_primary_10_1097_SAP_0000000000002122
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000005301
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_016_5758_2
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000006478
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ciresp_2019_10_004
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_021_10708_5
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1176915
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_020_08216_z
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000008770
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamasurg_2021_3758
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000003241
crossref_primary_10_1080_23320885_2022_2048179
crossref_primary_10_1097_SAP_0000000000002157
crossref_primary_10_1088_2515_7639_ac90ee
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_015_4752_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2024_01_030
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_020_08463_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breast_2021_07_003
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_815498
crossref_primary_10_1097_01_prs_0000479932_11170_8f
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000005891
crossref_primary_10_1080_2000656X_2018_1486320
crossref_primary_10_1111_tbj_13936
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000010935
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_020_08574_8
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000005920
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2022_03_008
crossref_primary_10_1515_sjpain_2021_0026
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2023_06_025
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_019_1640_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2023_107032
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_019_07251_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_021_06126_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2016_08_015
crossref_primary_10_1093_asj_sjae059
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2021_03_031
crossref_primary_10_1097_ANS_0000000000000329
crossref_primary_10_3238_arztebl_2015_0593
crossref_primary_10_1097_GOX_0000000000002524
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2017_05_009
crossref_primary_10_1111_jocn_14291
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_018_4937_1
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_015_4758_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2022_106443
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_024_07297_8
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_020_05639_w
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12609_024_00545_2
Cites_doi 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00505-5
10.1002/cncr.24623
10.1007/s10549-014-2981-z
10.1016/j.surg.2007.10.006
10.1002/cncr.26417
10.1097/00006534-200010000-00010
10.1097/00006534-199209000-00015
10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819a044f
10.1586/14737167.4.5.581
10.1016/j.ejso.2010.06.016
10.1097/00006534-199509001-00015
10.1016/j.breast.2007.01.009
10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi038
10.1007/s11136-005-0288-6
10.1097/00006534-200009020-00003
10.1007/s00268-007-9401-z
10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee807
10.1097/00006534-199807000-00008
10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ab10b2
10.1245/s10434-010-1091-3
10.1016/j.cps.2012.12.002
10.1023/A:1015291021312
10.1007/s10549-013-2643-6
10.1007/s00268-007-9196-y
10.1097/PRS.0b013e31823aec6b
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181728a5c
10.1186/1477-7819-9-159
10.1002/cncr.25552
10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00383.x
10.1097/00006534-199807000-00009
10.1200/JCO.2007.12.3141
10.1002/jso.23515
10.1200/JCO.2008.20.1681
10.7326/0003-4819-159-6-201309170-00003
10.1097/00000658-199307000-00006
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Society of Surgical Oncology 2014
Society of Surgical Oncology 2015
Copyright_xml – notice: Society of Surgical Oncology 2014
– notice: Society of Surgical Oncology 2015
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7TO
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
BENPR
CCPQU
FYUFA
GHDGH
H94
K9.
M0S
M1P
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
DOI 10.1245/s10434-014-4246-9
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
Medical Database
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 7X7
  name: Health & Medical Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1534-4681
EndPage 369
ExternalDocumentID 3558032441
10_1245_s10434_014_4246_9
25465378
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Feature
GroupedDBID ---
-53
-5E
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.86
.VR
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
199
1N0
1SB
203
23M
28-
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2WC
2~H
30V
3V.
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5GY
5QI
5VS
67Z
6J9
6NX
78A
7X7
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AABYN
AAFGU
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJKR
AAKSU
AANXM
AANZL
AAPBV
AARHV
AARTL
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAYFA
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFGW
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKAS
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABOCM
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABUWZ
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACBMV
ACBRV
ACBXY
ACBYP
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHVE
ACHXU
ACIGE
ACIHN
ACIPQ
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPRK
ACREN
ACTTH
ACUDM
ACVWB
ACWMK
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADIMF
ADINQ
ADJJI
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADMDM
ADOXG
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADYOE
ADZKW
AEAQA
AEBTG
AEEQQ
AEFIE
AEFTE
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AESTI
AETLH
AEVLU
AEVTX
AEXYK
AFAFS
AFEXP
AFJLC
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFNRJ
AFQWF
AFWTZ
AFYQB
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGBP
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGKHE
AGMZJ
AGQMX
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIIXL
AILAN
AIMYW
AITGF
AJBLW
AJDOV
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
AKQUC
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMTXH
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BAWUL
BBWZM
BDATZ
BENPR
BGNMA
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C1A
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DIK
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
EJD
EMOBN
EN4
ESBYG
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GRRUI
GX1
GXS
HEOXT
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
I09
IH2
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
IWAJR
IXC
IXD
IXE
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KOW
KPH
L7B
LAS
LLZTM
M1P
M4Y
MA-
N2Q
N9A
NB0
NDZJH
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
OVD
OWW
P19
P2P
P9S
PF0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QOK
QOR
QOS
R4E
R89
R9I
RHV
RNI
ROL
RPX
RRX
RSV
RZK
S16
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
S37
S3B
SAP
SCLPG
SDE
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
T16
TEORI
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UG4
UKHRP
UNUBA
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WJK
WK8
WOQ
YFH
YLTOR
Z45
Z5O
Z7U
Z7V
Z7W
Z7X
Z81
Z82
Z83
Z87
Z8O
Z8V
Z91
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
AAEOY
AAJBT
AASML
ABAKF
ACAOD
ACDTI
ACZOJ
AEFQL
AEMSY
AFBBN
AGQEE
AGRTI
AIGIU
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AACDK
AAYXX
AJOOF
ALIPV
CITATION
H13
7TO
7XB
8FK
H94
K9.
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-cc1deb278d1a8f2c0805f8d619f077880e9c2f112d47c13e87dd1d69ae5549113
IEDL.DBID AGYKE
ISSN 1068-9265
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 02:09:59 EDT 2024
Fri Sep 13 04:52:21 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 12 17:15:16 EDT 2024
Thu May 23 23:19:17 EDT 2024
Sat Dec 16 12:02:49 EST 2023
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Breast Cancer
Contralateral Breast
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
Flap Reconstruction
Breast Reconstruction
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c442t-cc1deb278d1a8f2c0805f8d619f077880e9c2f112d47c13e87dd1d69ae5549113
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 25465378
PQID 1645523555
PQPubID 32486
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1652398040
proquest_journals_1645523555
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_014_4246_9
pubmed_primary_25465378
springer_journals_10_1245_s10434_014_4246_9
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Boston
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Boston
– name: United States
– name: New York
PublicationTitle Annals of surgical oncology
PublicationTitleAbbrev Ann Surg Oncol
PublicationTitleAlternate Ann Surg Oncol
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Springer US
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer US
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References Denewer, Setit, Hussein, Farouk (CR38) 2008; 32
Tuttle, Jarosek, Habermann, Arrington, Abraham, Morris (CR28) 2009; 27
Gerber, Krause, Dieterich, Kundt, Reimer (CR39) 2009; 249
CR12
Lin, Zhunag, Momeni, Luan, Chung, Wright (CR35) 2014; 146
Janz, Mujahid, Lantz (CR2) 2005; 14
Eberlein, Crespo, Smith, Hergrueter, Douville, Eriksson (CR19) 1993; 218
Lantz, Janz, Fagerlin (CR25) 2005; 40
CR32
McLaughlin, Lillquist, Edge (CR31) 2009; 115
Aaronson, Alonso, Burnam (CR7) 2002; 11
Pusic, Klassen, Scott, Klok, Cordeiro, Cano (CR13) 2009; 124
Cano, Klassen, Scott, Pusic (CR11) 2013; 40
Tuttle, Habermann, Grund, Morris, Virnig (CR27) 2007; 25
Peralta, Ellenhorn, Wagman, Dagis, Andersen, Chu (CR30) 2000; 180
Hernanz, Sanchez, Cerdeira, Figuero (CR24) 2011; 9
McCarthy, Klassen, Cano (CR16) 2010; 116
Wilkins, Cederna, Lowery (CR6) 2000; 106
Kroll, Baldwin (CR21) 1992; 90
Sackey, Sandelin, Frisell, Wickman, Brandberg (CR4) 2010; 36
CR8
Rosenberg, Tracy, Meyer, Sepucha, Gelber, Hirschfield Bartek (CR36) 2013; 159
Yao, Stewart, Winchester, Winchester (CR29) 2010; 17
Gopie, Hilhorst, Kleijne, Timman, Menke-Pluymers, Hofer (CR34) 2011; 124
Ueda, Tamaki, Yano (CR5) 2008; 143
Kroll, Coffey, Winn, Schusterman (CR22) 1995; 96
Alderman, Wilkins, Lowery, Kim, Davis (CR18) 2000; 106
Atisha, Locklear, Rogers, Rushing, Samsa, Abernethy (CR9) 2014; 109
Tracy, Rosenberg, Dominici, Partridge (CR26) 2013; 140
Slavin, Schnitt, Duda (CR23) 1998; 102
Cano, Klassen, Scott, Cordeiro, Pusic (CR10) 2012; 129
Nekhlyudov, Bower, Herrinton, Altschuler, Greene, Rolnick (CR33) 2005; 35
Hernanz, Regano, Redondo-Figuero, Orallo, Erasun, Gomez Fleitas (CR37) 2007; 31
Atisha, Alderman, Lowery, Kuhn, Davis, Wilkins (CR1) 2008; 247
Zhong, McCarthy, Min (CR17) 2012; 118
Hidalgo (CR20) 1998; 102
Hu, Pusic, Waljee (CR15) 2009; 124
Norman, Sloan, Wyrwich (CR14) 2004; 4
Nicholson, Leinster, Sassoon (CR3) 2007; 16
25413268 - Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;22(2):351-2
H Sackey (4246_CR4) 2010; 36
AK Alderman (4246_CR18) 2000; 106
T Zhong (4246_CR17) 2012; 118
MS Tracy (4246_CR26) 2013; 140
4246_CR32
4246_CR12
K Yao (4246_CR29) 2010; 17
DM Atisha (4246_CR9) 2014; 109
B Gerber (4246_CR39) 2009; 249
SS Kroll (4246_CR21) 1992; 90
A Denewer (4246_CR38) 2008; 32
AL Pusic (4246_CR13) 2009; 124
SM Rosenberg (4246_CR36) 2013; 159
D Atisha (4246_CR1) 2008; 247
N Aaronson (4246_CR7) 2002; 11
F Hernanz (4246_CR24) 2011; 9
SJ Cano (4246_CR11) 2013; 40
PM Lantz (4246_CR25) 2005; 40
RM Nicholson (4246_CR3) 2007; 16
CC McLaughlin (4246_CR31) 2009; 115
SJ Cano (4246_CR10) 2012; 129
DA Hidalgo (4246_CR20) 1998; 102
C Lin (4246_CR35) 2014; 146
ES Hu (4246_CR15) 2009; 124
TM Tuttle (4246_CR28) 2009; 27
JP Gopie (4246_CR34) 2011; 124
EA Peralta (4246_CR30) 2000; 180
EG Wilkins (4246_CR6) 2000; 106
F Hernanz (4246_CR37) 2007; 31
TJ Eberlein (4246_CR19) 1993; 218
NK Janz (4246_CR2) 2005; 14
CM McCarthy (4246_CR16) 2010; 116
GR Norman (4246_CR14) 2004; 4
SS Kroll (4246_CR22) 1995; 96
S Ueda (4246_CR5) 2008; 143
TM Tuttle (4246_CR27) 2007; 25
L Nekhlyudov (4246_CR33) 2005; 35
SA Slavin (4246_CR23) 1998; 102
4246_CR8
References_xml – volume: 180
  start-page: 439
  issue: 6
  year: 2000
  end-page: 445
  ident: CR30
  article-title: Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy improves the outcome of selected patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer
  publication-title: Am J Surg.
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00505-5
  contributor:
    fullname: Chu
– volume: 115
  start-page: 5404
  issue: 23
  year: 2009
  end-page: 5412
  ident: CR31
  article-title: Surveillance of prophylactic mastectomy: trends in use from 1995 to 2005
  publication-title: Cancer.
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.24623
  contributor:
    fullname: Edge
– volume: 146
  start-page: 117
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  end-page: 126
  ident: CR35
  article-title: Quality of life and patient satisfaction after microsurgical abdominal flap versus staged expander/implant breast reconstruction: a critical study of unilateral immediate breast reconstruction using patient reported outcomes instrument Breast-Q
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res Treat.
  doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2981-z
  contributor:
    fullname: Wright
– volume: 143
  start-page: 414
  year: 2008
  end-page: 425
  ident: CR5
  article-title: Cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction after skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer with immediate reconstruction of the breast
  publication-title: Surgery.
  doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.10.006
  contributor:
    fullname: Yano
– volume: 118
  start-page: 1701
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1709
  ident: CR17
  article-title: Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life after autologous tissue breast reconstruction: a prospective analysis of early postoperative outcomes
  publication-title: Cancer.
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.26417
  contributor:
    fullname: Min
– volume: 106
  start-page: 1014
  year: 2000
  end-page: 1025
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/00006534-200010000-00010
  contributor:
    fullname: Lowery
– volume: 90
  start-page: 455
  year: 1992
  end-page: 462
  ident: CR21
  article-title: A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/00006534-199209000-00015
  contributor:
    fullname: Baldwin
– volume: 249
  start-page: 461
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  end-page: 468
  ident: CR39
  article-title: The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study
  publication-title: Ann Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819a044f
  contributor:
    fullname: Reimer
– volume: 4
  start-page: 581
  year: 2004
  end-page: 585
  ident: CR14
  article-title: The truly remarkable universality of half a standard deviation: confirmation through another look
  publication-title: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res.
  doi: 10.1586/14737167.4.5.581
  contributor:
    fullname: Wyrwich
– volume: 36
  start-page: 756
  year: 2010
  end-page: 762
  ident: CR4
  article-title: Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Long-term follow-up of health-related quality of life, emotional reactions and body image
  publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.06.016
  contributor:
    fullname: Brandberg
– volume: 96
  start-page: 860
  year: 1995
  end-page: 864
  ident: CR22
  article-title: A comparison of factors affecting aesthetic outcomes of TRAM flap breast reconstructions
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/00006534-199509001-00015
  contributor:
    fullname: Schusterman
– volume: 16
  start-page: 396
  year: 2007
  end-page: 410
  ident: CR3
  article-title: A comparison of the cosmetic and psychological outcome of breast reconstruction, breast conserving surgery and mastectomy without reconstruction
  publication-title: Breast.
  doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.01.009
  contributor:
    fullname: Sassoon
– ident: CR12
– volume: 35
  start-page: 55
  year: 2005
  end-page: 60
  ident: CR33
  article-title: Women’s decision-making roles regarding contralateral prophylacti mastectomy
  publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr.
  doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi038
  contributor:
    fullname: Rolnick
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1467
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1479
  ident: CR2
  article-title: Population-based study of the relationship of treatment and sociodemographics on quality of life for early stage breast cancer
  publication-title: Qual Life Res.
  doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-0288-6
  contributor:
    fullname: Lantz
– volume: 106
  start-page: 769
  year: 2000
  end-page: 776
  ident: CR18
  article-title: Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/00006534-200009020-00003
  contributor:
    fullname: Davis
– volume: 32
  start-page: 2586
  year: 2008
  end-page: 2592
  ident: CR38
  article-title: Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction by a new modification of extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap
  publication-title: World J Surg.
  doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9401-z
  contributor:
    fullname: Farouk
– volume: 124
  start-page: 345
  year: 2009
  end-page: 353
  ident: CR13
  article-title: Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee807
  contributor:
    fullname: Cano
– volume: 102
  start-page: 49
  year: 1998
  end-page: 62
  ident: CR23
  article-title: Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: oncologic risks and aesthetic results in patients with early-stage breast cancer
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/00006534-199807000-00008
  contributor:
    fullname: Duda
– ident: CR8
– volume: 124
  start-page: 1
  year: 2009
  end-page: 8
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship period
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ab10b2
  contributor:
    fullname: Waljee
– volume: 17
  start-page: 2554
  issue: 10
  year: 2010
  end-page: 2562
  ident: CR29
  article-title: Trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral cancer: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 1998–2007
  publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol.
  doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1091-3
  contributor:
    fullname: Winchester
– volume: 40
  start-page: 287
  year: 2013
  end-page: 296
  ident: CR11
  article-title: A closer look at the BREAST-Q©
  publication-title: Clin Plast Surg.
  doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2012.12.002
  contributor:
    fullname: Pusic
– volume: 11
  start-page: 193
  year: 2002
  end-page: 205
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria
  publication-title: Qual Life Res.
  doi: 10.1023/A:1015291021312
  contributor:
    fullname: Burnam
– volume: 140
  start-page: 447
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  end-page: 452
  ident: CR26
  article-title: Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with breast cancer: trends, predictors, and areas for future research
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res Treat.
  doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2643-6
  contributor:
    fullname: Partridge
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1934
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1940
  ident: CR37
  article-title: Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: analysis of quadrantectomy and immediate reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap
  publication-title: World J Surg.
  doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9196-y
  contributor:
    fullname: Gomez Fleitas
– volume: 129
  start-page: 293
  year: 2012
  end-page: 302
  ident: CR10
  article-title: The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31823aec6b
  contributor:
    fullname: Pusic
– volume: 247
  start-page: 1019
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1028
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study
  publication-title: Ann Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181728a5c
  contributor:
    fullname: Wilkins
– volume: 9
  start-page: 159
  year: 2011
  ident: CR24
  article-title: Long-term results of breast conservation and immediate volume replacement with myocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap
  publication-title: World J Surg Oncol.
  doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-9-159
  contributor:
    fullname: Figuero
– volume: 116
  start-page: 5584
  year: 2010
  end-page: 5591
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparison of saline and silicone implants
  publication-title: Cancer.
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.25552
  contributor:
    fullname: Cano
– volume: 124
  start-page: 1781
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1789
  ident: CR34
  article-title: Women’s motives to opt for either implant or DIEP flap breast reconstruction
  publication-title: J Plast Reconstr Surg.
  contributor:
    fullname: Hofer
– volume: 40
  start-page: 745
  year: 2005
  end-page: 767
  ident: CR25
  article-title: Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer
  publication-title: Health Serv Res.
  doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00383.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Fagerlin
– volume: 102
  start-page: 63
  year: 1998
  end-page: 70
  ident: CR20
  article-title: Aesthetic refinement in breast reconstruction: complete skin-sparing mastectomy with autogenous tissue transfer
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/00006534-199807000-00009
  contributor:
    fullname: Hidalgo
– ident: CR32
– volume: 25
  start-page: 5203
  issue: 33
  year: 2007
  end-page: 5209
  ident: CR27
  article-title: Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol.
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.3141
  contributor:
    fullname: Virnig
– volume: 109
  start-page: 504
  year: 2014
  end-page: 505
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Partnering with engaged patients accelerates research
  publication-title: J Surg Oncol.
  doi: 10.1002/jso.23515
  contributor:
    fullname: Abernethy
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1362
  issue: 9
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1367
  ident: CR28
  article-title: Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol.
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.1681
  contributor:
    fullname: Morris
– volume: 159
  start-page: 373
  issue: 6
  year: 2013
  end-page: 381
  ident: CR36
  article-title: Perceptions, knowledge and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med.
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-6-201309170-00003
  contributor:
    fullname: Hirschfield Bartek
– volume: 218
  start-page: 29
  year: 1993
  end-page: 36
  ident: CR19
  article-title: Prospective evaluation of immediate reconstruction after mastectomy
  publication-title: Ann Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/00000658-199307000-00006
  contributor:
    fullname: Eriksson
– volume: 106
  start-page: 1014
  year: 2000
  ident: 4246_CR6
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/00006534-200010000-00010
  contributor:
    fullname: EG Wilkins
– volume: 109
  start-page: 504
  year: 2014
  ident: 4246_CR9
  publication-title: J Surg Oncol.
  doi: 10.1002/jso.23515
  contributor:
    fullname: DM Atisha
– volume: 124
  start-page: 345
  year: 2009
  ident: 4246_CR13
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee807
  contributor:
    fullname: AL Pusic
– volume: 35
  start-page: 55
  year: 2005
  ident: 4246_CR33
  publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr.
  doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi038
  contributor:
    fullname: L Nekhlyudov
– volume: 124
  start-page: 1781
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  ident: 4246_CR34
  publication-title: J Plast Reconstr Surg.
  contributor:
    fullname: JP Gopie
– volume: 249
  start-page: 461
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  ident: 4246_CR39
  publication-title: Ann Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819a044f
  contributor:
    fullname: B Gerber
– volume: 146
  start-page: 117
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: 4246_CR35
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res Treat.
  doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2981-z
  contributor:
    fullname: C Lin
– volume: 159
  start-page: 373
  issue: 6
  year: 2013
  ident: 4246_CR36
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med.
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-6-201309170-00003
  contributor:
    fullname: SM Rosenberg
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1934
  year: 2007
  ident: 4246_CR37
  publication-title: World J Surg.
  doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9196-y
  contributor:
    fullname: F Hernanz
– ident: 4246_CR12
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1467
  year: 2005
  ident: 4246_CR2
  publication-title: Qual Life Res.
  doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-0288-6
  contributor:
    fullname: NK Janz
– volume: 32
  start-page: 2586
  year: 2008
  ident: 4246_CR38
  publication-title: World J Surg.
  doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9401-z
  contributor:
    fullname: A Denewer
– volume: 9
  start-page: 159
  year: 2011
  ident: 4246_CR24
  publication-title: World J Surg Oncol.
  doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-9-159
  contributor:
    fullname: F Hernanz
– volume: 115
  start-page: 5404
  issue: 23
  year: 2009
  ident: 4246_CR31
  publication-title: Cancer.
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.24623
  contributor:
    fullname: CC McLaughlin
– volume: 25
  start-page: 5203
  issue: 33
  year: 2007
  ident: 4246_CR27
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol.
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.3141
  contributor:
    fullname: TM Tuttle
– volume: 129
  start-page: 293
  year: 2012
  ident: 4246_CR10
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31823aec6b
  contributor:
    fullname: SJ Cano
– volume: 96
  start-page: 860
  year: 1995
  ident: 4246_CR22
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/00006534-199509001-00015
  contributor:
    fullname: SS Kroll
– volume: 16
  start-page: 396
  year: 2007
  ident: 4246_CR3
  publication-title: Breast.
  doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.01.009
  contributor:
    fullname: RM Nicholson
– volume: 116
  start-page: 5584
  year: 2010
  ident: 4246_CR16
  publication-title: Cancer.
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.25552
  contributor:
    fullname: CM McCarthy
– ident: 4246_CR8
– volume: 218
  start-page: 29
  year: 1993
  ident: 4246_CR19
  publication-title: Ann Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/00000658-199307000-00006
  contributor:
    fullname: TJ Eberlein
– volume: 40
  start-page: 745
  year: 2005
  ident: 4246_CR25
  publication-title: Health Serv Res.
  doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00383.x
  contributor:
    fullname: PM Lantz
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1362
  issue: 9
  year: 2009
  ident: 4246_CR28
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol.
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.1681
  contributor:
    fullname: TM Tuttle
– volume: 17
  start-page: 2554
  issue: 10
  year: 2010
  ident: 4246_CR29
  publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol.
  doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1091-3
  contributor:
    fullname: K Yao
– volume: 143
  start-page: 414
  year: 2008
  ident: 4246_CR5
  publication-title: Surgery.
  doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.10.006
  contributor:
    fullname: S Ueda
– volume: 90
  start-page: 455
  year: 1992
  ident: 4246_CR21
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/00006534-199209000-00015
  contributor:
    fullname: SS Kroll
– volume: 40
  start-page: 287
  year: 2013
  ident: 4246_CR11
  publication-title: Clin Plast Surg.
  doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2012.12.002
  contributor:
    fullname: SJ Cano
– volume: 247
  start-page: 1019
  year: 2008
  ident: 4246_CR1
  publication-title: Ann Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181728a5c
  contributor:
    fullname: D Atisha
– volume: 36
  start-page: 756
  year: 2010
  ident: 4246_CR4
  publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.06.016
  contributor:
    fullname: H Sackey
– volume: 102
  start-page: 49
  year: 1998
  ident: 4246_CR23
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/00006534-199807000-00008
  contributor:
    fullname: SA Slavin
– ident: 4246_CR32
– volume: 4
  start-page: 581
  year: 2004
  ident: 4246_CR14
  publication-title: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res.
  doi: 10.1586/14737167.4.5.581
  contributor:
    fullname: GR Norman
– volume: 106
  start-page: 769
  year: 2000
  ident: 4246_CR18
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/00006534-200009020-00003
  contributor:
    fullname: AK Alderman
– volume: 11
  start-page: 193
  year: 2002
  ident: 4246_CR7
  publication-title: Qual Life Res.
  doi: 10.1023/A:1015291021312
  contributor:
    fullname: N Aaronson
– volume: 102
  start-page: 63
  year: 1998
  ident: 4246_CR20
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/00006534-199807000-00009
  contributor:
    fullname: DA Hidalgo
– volume: 118
  start-page: 1701
  year: 2012
  ident: 4246_CR17
  publication-title: Cancer.
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.26417
  contributor:
    fullname: T Zhong
– volume: 124
  start-page: 1
  year: 2009
  ident: 4246_CR15
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg.
  contributor:
    fullname: ES Hu
– volume: 180
  start-page: 439
  issue: 6
  year: 2000
  ident: 4246_CR30
  publication-title: Am J Surg.
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00505-5
  contributor:
    fullname: EA Peralta
– volume: 140
  start-page: 447
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  ident: 4246_CR26
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res Treat.
  doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2643-6
  contributor:
    fullname: MS Tracy
SSID ssj0017305
Score 2.5493457
Snippet Purpose Women with early-stage breast cancer face the complex decision to undergo one of three equally effective oncologic surgical strategies:...
Women with early-stage breast cancer face the complex decision to undergo one of three equally effective oncologic surgical strategies: breast-conservation...
PURPOSEWomen with early-stage breast cancer face the complex decision to undergo one of three equally effective oncologic surgical strategies:...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 361
SubjectTerms Breast Implantation
Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Breast Oncology
Decision Making
Female
Humans
Linear Models
Mammaplasty
Mastectomy
Mastectomy, Segmental
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Oncology
Patient Satisfaction
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LS8QwEB50F8SL-La-iOBJCWvapE1PsoqyCCviA7yVtEnxIO262_3_zvSxKqLnljbMTCbf5JsHwGkmTM3WcZ0Ky2UexTyOZcB9EbrACBtJS7XD4_tw9CLvXtXrEoy6WhhKq-x8Yu2obZnRHfkAYb3CoEkpNTAp3QJk1eBy8sFpfhTxrO0wjWXo-0ISYdu_url_eFwwCmjJqmY-Q9zgfqhahtOXisroZEC5GJJLX4Y8_nlG_QKev0jT-iy6XYe1FkSyYaP1DVhyxSasjFuafAuGQ9b2u35nT4WZzN7KipU5e_pWysDoBpZdUU56xa5J91NWVw3YOUbg2_Bye_N8PeLtrASeSelXPMuExSA50lYYnfvUP1zl2mJ4lF9EGOZeuDjzcwRXVkaZCJyOrBU2jI1DPIEOL9iBXlEWbg-YE9LEWqdGuFxqK9MAUZnBSMcIGpweeXDWSSeZNC0xEgolUJRJI8oERZmQKJPYg8NOfkm7O2bJly49OFk8RrsmssIUrpzTO4paE6KP8WC3kfvib9TDXwWR9uC8U8S3j_-1lP3_l3IAqwiGVJORfQi9ajp3Rwg4qvS4taVPJObPAA
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title A National Snapshot of Satisfaction with Breast Cancer Procedures
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-014-4246-9
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25465378
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1645523555/abstract/
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1652398040
Volume 22
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LT-MwEB5BkVZceC2P8KiMxGlXrnBix84xRS0IRIWASuUUObEjpKIU0fTCr2ecpBWocOCUgy0nGY_t-fzNA-AsY7pi66hKmaE8lxGNIh5Qn4U20MxIblzs8O0gvBry65EYrYC_uLooxp05I1lt1FUCBC5crBsPnMMEp9znIY1WYU24qtQtWIsvn256C-4AdVZUHGeIS9kPRcNlfjvI19NoycRcokerU6e_WUcCTqtkhc7ZZNyZlWkne19O5fiLH9qCjcYIJXGtNduwYosd-HPb0Ox_IY5Jky_7hTwU-nX6PCnJJCcPn0IhiLvBJV3n016SC6c7b6SKOjAzRPC7MOz3Hi-uaFNrgWac-yXNMmYQZEtlmFa57_KPi1wZhFf5uUSYfG6jzM_RODNcZiywShrDTBhpi_YIbpjBHrSKSWEPgFjGdaRUqpnNuTI8DdCq04iUNHOF16UH_-YyT17rlBqJgyIolKQWSoJCSZxQksiD4_msJM3qmiYI8QQCaCGEB6eLZlwXjuzQhZ3MXB_hUhviHuXBfj2bi7e5GgAikMqD__Op-TT4T59y-KveR7COtpWoHbyPoVW-zewJ2i9l2oZVOZJtVNt-tztoN-qLz25vcHePrUM__gBNrec3
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,12083,21416,27957,27958,31754,31755,33779,33780,41116,41558,42185,42627,43345,43840,52146,52269,74102,74659
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LT9wwEB5RkFouCPoilFJX6qmVVRzbsXOqtgi0tCwXQNqb5Y0dcaiShc3-f2YS7xaE2nOixJoZj7_P8wL4UgnfR-u4nYnAVW1KXpZK8lwUUXoRjApUOzy5LMY36tdUT9OF2yKlVa58Yu-oQ1vRHfl3hPUaSZPW-sf8jtPUKIquphEaL2BLSakopc9M14RLoPXqPtpZ4KbOC52imrnSVDqnJOVfKK5yVfDy6bn0DGw-C5T258_ZLuwk4MhGg6b3YCM2r-HlJIXG38BoxFKP6z_sqvHzxW3bsbZmV4_KFxjdurKflIfesRPS9z3rKwXCEln3W7g5O70-GfM0H4FXSuUdryoRkBgbG4S3dU49w3VtA1Ki-tggtT2OZZXXCKiCMpWQ0ZoQRChKHxFDoJOT72CzaZu4DywK5UtrZ17EWtmgZhKRmEd24wUNSzcZfF1Jx82HNhiO6AOK0g2idChKR6J0ZQaHK_m5tCMW7q_-Mvi8foy2TAEK38R2Se9oakeIfiWD94Pc13-jvv1aGpvBt5UiHn38X0s5-P9SPsGr8fXkwl2cX_7-ANsIhvSQkX0Im939Mn5EwNHNjnqregAUSszN
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwED_BkKa9TGzAyNiHkXgCWasTO3aeUDdWdYNOSGNS3yw3dsTDlHRt-v9zl7jd0ATPiRLr7nz-_XxfAJ9K4bpoHTcz4bmsdMGLQmY8FXnInPBaeqodntzk4zt5PVXTmP-0jGmVa5_YOWrflHRHfoawXiFpUkqdVTEt4ue30df5A6cJUhRpjeM0XsIrPCUHNM1ATzfkS6Alqy7ymeMGT3MVI5ypVFRGJzPKxZBcpjLnxd9n1DPg-Sxo2p1Fo9ewG0EkG_Za34MXod6H7UkMk7-B4ZDFftf37LZ28-XvpmVNxW6flDIwuoFl55ST3rIL0v2CdVUDfoUM_C3cjS5_XYx5nJXASynTlpel8EiStfHCmSql_uGqMh7pUTXQSHMHoSjTCsGVl7oUWTDae-HzwgXEE-jwsnewVTd1eA8sCOkKY2ZOhEoaL2cZojKHTMcJGpyuE_i8lo6d9y0xLFEJFKXtRWlRlJZEaYsEjtbys3F3LO2jLhP4uHmMdk3BCleHZkXvKGpNiD4mgYNe7pu_UQ9_lWmTwJe1Ip58_F9LOfz_Uk5hGw3K_ri6-f4BdhAXqT45-wi22sUqHCP2aGcnnVH9Ac4d0Pk
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+national+snapshot+of+satisfaction+with+breast+cancer+procedures&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+surgical+oncology&rft.au=Atisha%2C+Dunya+M&rft.au=Rushing%2C+Christel+N&rft.au=Samsa%2C+Gregory+P&rft.au=Locklear%2C+Tracie+D&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=369&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245%2Fs10434-014-4246-9&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1068-9265&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1068-9265&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1068-9265&client=summon