Cortical Overlap and Cortical-Hippocampal Interactions Predict Subsequent True and False Memory

The declarative memory system allows us to accurately recognize a countless number of items and events, particularly those strengthened by repeated exposure. However, increased familiarity due to repetition can also lead to false recognition of related but new items, particularly when mechanisms sup...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of neuroscience Vol. 40; no. 9; pp. 1920 - 1930
Main Authors Wing, Erik A., Geib, Benjamin R., Wang, Wei-Chun, Monge, Zachary, Davis, Simon W., Cabeza, Roberto
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Society for Neuroscience 26.02.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The declarative memory system allows us to accurately recognize a countless number of items and events, particularly those strengthened by repeated exposure. However, increased familiarity due to repetition can also lead to false recognition of related but new items, particularly when mechanisms supporting fine-grain mnemonic discrimination fail. The hippocampus is thought to be particularly important in separating overlapping cortical inputs during encoding so that similar experiences can be differentiated. In the current study of male and female human subjects, we examine how neural pattern similarity between repeated exemplars of a given concept (e.g., apple) influences true and false memory for target or lure images. Consistent with past work, we found that subsequent true recognition was related to pattern similarity between concept exemplars and the entire encoding set (global encoding similarity), particularly in ventral visual stream. In addition, memory for an individual target exemplar (a specific apple) could be predicted solely by the degree of pattern overlap between the other exemplars (different apple pictures) of that concept (concept-specific encoding similarity). Critically, subsequent false memory for lures was mitigated when high concept-specific similarity in cortical areas was accompanied by differentiated hippocampal representations of the corresponding exemplars. Furthermore, both true and false memory entailed the reinstatement of concept-related information at varying levels of specificity. These results link both true and false memory to a measure of concept strength expressed in the overlap of cortical representations, and importantly, illustrate how the hippocampus serves to separate concurrent cortical overlap in the service of detailed memory. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In some instances, the same processes that help promote memory for a general idea or concept can also hinder more detailed memory judgments, which may involve differentiating between closely related items. The current study shows that increased overlap in cortical representations for conceptually-related pictures is associated with increased recognition of repeated concept pictures. Whether similar lure items were falsely remembered as old further depended on the hippocampus, where the presence of more distinct representations protected against later false memory. This work suggests that the differentiability of brain patterns during perception is related to the differentiability of items in memory, but that fine-grain discrimination depends on the interaction between cortex and hippocampus.
AbstractList The declarative memory system allows us to accurately recognize a countless number of items and events, particularly those strengthened by repeated exposure. However, increased familiarity due to repetition can also lead to false recognition of related but new items, particularly when mechanisms supporting fine-grain mnemonic discrimination fail. The hippocampus is thought to be particularly important in separating overlapping cortical inputs during encoding so that similar experiences can be differentiated. In the current study of male and female human subjects, we examine how neural pattern similarity between repeated exemplars of a given concept (e.g., apple) influences true and false memory for target or lure images. Consistent with past work, we found that subsequent true recognition was related to pattern similarity between concept exemplars and the entire encoding set (global encoding similarity), particularly in ventral visual stream. In addition, memory for an individual target exemplar (a specific apple) could be predicted solely by the degree of pattern overlap between the other exemplars (different apple pictures) of that concept (concept-specific encoding similarity). Critically, subsequent false memory for lures was mitigated when high concept-specific similarity in cortical areas was accompanied by differentiated hippocampal representations of the corresponding exemplars. Furthermore, both true and false memory entailed the reinstatement of concept-related information at varying levels of specificity. These results link both true and false memory to a measure of concept strength expressed in the overlap of cortical representations, and importantly, illustrate how the hippocampus serves to separate concurrent cortical overlap in the service of detailed memory. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In some instances, the same processes that help promote memory for a general idea or concept can also hinder more detailed memory judgments, which may involve differentiating between closely related items. The current study shows that increased overlap in cortical representations for conceptually-related pictures is associated with increased recognition of repeated concept pictures. Whether similar lure items were falsely remembered as old further depended on the hippocampus, where the presence of more distinct representations protected against later false memory. This work suggests that the differentiability of brain patterns during perception is related to the differentiability of items in memory, but that fine-grain discrimination depends on the interaction between cortex and hippocampus.
The declarative memory system allows us to accurately recognize a countless number of items and events, particularly those strengthened by repeated exposure. However, increased familiarity due to repetition can also lead to false recognition of related but new items, particularly when mechanisms supporting fine-grain mnemonic discrimination fail. The declarative memory system allows us to accurately recognize a countless number of items and events, particularly those strengthened by repeated exposure. However, increased familiarity due to repetition can also lead to false recognition of related but new items, particularly when mechanisms supporting fine-grain mnemonic discrimination fail. The hippocampus is thought to be particularly important in separating overlapping cortical inputs during encoding so that similar experiences can be differentiated. In the current study of male and female human subjects, we examine how neural pattern similarity between repeated exemplars of a given concept (e.g., apple) influences true and false memory for target or lure images. Consistent with past work, we found that subsequent true recognition was related to pattern similarity between concept exemplars and the entire encoding set (global encoding similarity), particularly in ventral visual stream. In addition, memory for an individual target exemplar (a specific apple) could be predicted solely by the degree of pattern overlap between the other exemplars (different apple pictures) of that concept (concept-specific encoding similarity). Critically, subsequent false memory for lures was mitigated when high concept-specific similarity in cortical areas was accompanied by differentiated hippocampal representations of the corresponding exemplars. Furthermore, both true and false memory entailed the reinstatement of concept-related information at varying levels of specificity. These results link both true and false memory to a measure of concept strength expressed in the overlap of cortical representations, and importantly, illustrate how the hippocampus serves to separate concurrent cortical overlap in the service of detailed memory. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In some instances, the same processes that help promote memory for a general idea or concept can also hinder more detailed memory judgments, which may involve differentiating between closely related items. The current study shows that increased overlap in cortical representations for conceptually-related pictures is associated with increased recognition of repeated concept pictures. Whether similar lure items were falsely remembered as old further depended on the hippocampus, where the presence of more distinct representations protected against later false memory. This work suggests that the differentiability of brain patterns during perception is related to the differentiability of items in memory, but that fine-grain discrimination depends on the interaction between cortex and hippocampus.
The declarative memory system allows us to accurately recognize a countless number of items and events, particularly those strengthened by repeated exposure. However, increased familiarity due to repetition can also lead to false recognition of related but new items, particularly when mechanisms supporting fine-grain mnemonic discrimination fail. The hippocampus is thought to be particularly important in separating overlapping cortical inputs during encoding so that similar experiences can be differentiated. In the current study of male and female human subjects, we examine how neural pattern similarity between repeated exemplars of a given concept (e.g., apple) influences true and false memory for target or lure images. Consistent with past work, we found that subsequent true recognition was related to pattern similarity between concept exemplars and the entire encoding set (global encoding similarity), particularly in ventral visual stream. In addition, memory for an individual target exemplar (a specific apple) could be predicted solely by the degree of pattern overlap between the other exemplars (different apple pictures) of that concept (concept-specific encoding similarity). Critically, subsequent false memory for lures was mitigated when high concept-specific similarity in cortical areas was accompanied by differentiated hippocampal representations of the corresponding exemplars. Furthermore, both true and false memory entailed the reinstatement of concept-related information at varying levels of specificity. These results link both true and false memory to a measure of concept strength expressed in the overlap of cortical representations, and importantly, illustrate how the hippocampus serves to separate concurrent cortical overlap in the service of detailed memory.
The declarative memory system allows us to accurately recognize a countless number of items and events, particularly those strengthened by repeated exposure. However, increased familiarity due to repetition can also lead to false recognition of related but new items, particularly when mechanisms supporting fine-grain mnemonic discrimination fail. The hippocampus is thought to be particularly important in separating overlapping cortical inputs during encoding so that similar experiences can be differentiated. In the current study of male and female human subjects, we examine how neural pattern similarity between repeated exemplars of a given concept (e.g., apple) influences true and false memory for target or lure images. Consistent with past work, we found that subsequent true recognition was related to pattern similarity between concept exemplars and the entire encoding set (global encoding similarity), particularly in ventral visual stream. In addition, memory for an individual target exemplar (a specific apple) could be predicted solely by the degree of pattern overlap between the other exemplars (different apple pictures) of that concept (concept-specific encoding similarity). Critically, subsequent false memory for lures was mitigated when high concept-specific similarity in cortical areas was accompanied by differentiated hippocampal representations of the corresponding exemplars. Furthermore, both true and false memory entailed the reinstatement of concept-related information at varying levels of specificity. These results link both true and false memory to a measure of concept strength expressed in the overlap of cortical representations, and importantly, illustrate how the hippocampus serves to separate concurrent cortical overlap in the service of detailed memory. In some instances, the same processes that help promote memory for a general idea or concept can also hinder more detailed memory judgments, which may involve differentiating between closely related items. The current study shows that increased overlap in cortical representations for conceptually-related pictures is associated with increased recognition of repeated concept pictures. Whether similar lure items were falsely remembered as old further depended on the hippocampus, where the presence of more distinct representations protected against later false memory. This work suggests that the differentiability of brain patterns during perception is related to the differentiability of items in memory, but that fine-grain discrimination depends on the interaction between cortex and hippocampus.
The declarative memory system allows us to accurately recognize a countless number of items and events, particularly those strengthened by repeated exposure. However, increased familiarity due to repetition can also lead to false recognition of related but new items, particularly when mechanisms supporting fine-grain mnemonic discrimination fail. The hippocampus is thought to be particularly important in separating overlapping cortical inputs during encoding so that similar experiences can be differentiated. In the current study of male and female human subjects, we examine how neural pattern similarity between repeated exemplars of a given concept (e.g., apple) influences true and false memory for target or lure images. Consistent with past work, we found that subsequent true recognition was related to pattern similarity between concept exemplars and the entire encoding set (global encoding similarity), particularly in ventral visual stream. In addition, memory for an individual target exemplar (a specific apple) could be predicted solely by the degree of pattern overlap between the other exemplars (different apple pictures) of that concept (concept-specific encoding similarity). Critically, subsequent false memory for lures was mitigated when high concept-specific similarity in cortical areas was accompanied by differentiated hippocampal representations of the corresponding exemplars. Furthermore, both true and false memory entailed the reinstatement of concept-related information at varying levels of specificity. These results link both true and false memory to a measure of concept strength expressed in the overlap of cortical representations, and importantly, illustrate how the hippocampus serves to separate concurrent cortical overlap in the service of detailed memory.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In some instances, the same processes that help promote memory for a general idea or concept can also hinder more detailed memory judgments, which may involve differentiating between closely related items. The current study shows that increased overlap in cortical representations for conceptually-related pictures is associated with increased recognition of repeated concept pictures. Whether similar lure items were falsely remembered as old further depended on the hippocampus, where the presence of more distinct representations protected against later false memory. This work suggests that the differentiability of brain patterns during perception is related to the differentiability of items in memory, but that fine-grain discrimination depends on the interaction between cortex and hippocampus.The declarative memory system allows us to accurately recognize a countless number of items and events, particularly those strengthened by repeated exposure. However, increased familiarity due to repetition can also lead to false recognition of related but new items, particularly when mechanisms supporting fine-grain mnemonic discrimination fail. The hippocampus is thought to be particularly important in separating overlapping cortical inputs during encoding so that similar experiences can be differentiated. In the current study of male and female human subjects, we examine how neural pattern similarity between repeated exemplars of a given concept (e.g., apple) influences true and false memory for target or lure images. Consistent with past work, we found that subsequent true recognition was related to pattern similarity between concept exemplars and the entire encoding set (global encoding similarity), particularly in ventral visual stream. In addition, memory for an individual target exemplar (a specific apple) could be predicted solely by the degree of pattern overlap between the other exemplars (different apple pictures) of that concept (concept-specific encoding similarity). Critically, subsequent false memory for lures was mitigated when high concept-specific similarity in cortical areas was accompanied by differentiated hippocampal representations of the corresponding exemplars. Furthermore, both true and false memory entailed the reinstatement of concept-related information at varying levels of specificity. These results link both true and false memory to a measure of concept strength expressed in the overlap of cortical representations, and importantly, illustrate how the hippocampus serves to separate concurrent cortical overlap in the service of detailed memory.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In some instances, the same processes that help promote memory for a general idea or concept can also hinder more detailed memory judgments, which may involve differentiating between closely related items. The current study shows that increased overlap in cortical representations for conceptually-related pictures is associated with increased recognition of repeated concept pictures. Whether similar lure items were falsely remembered as old further depended on the hippocampus, where the presence of more distinct representations protected against later false memory. This work suggests that the differentiability of brain patterns during perception is related to the differentiability of items in memory, but that fine-grain discrimination depends on the interaction between cortex and hippocampus.
Author Wing, Erik A.
Geib, Benjamin R.
Wang, Wei-Chun
Davis, Simon W.
Monge, Zachary
Cabeza, Roberto
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Erik A.
  surname: Wing
  fullname: Wing, Erik A.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Benjamin R.
  surname: Geib
  fullname: Geib, Benjamin R.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Wei-Chun
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Wei-Chun
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Zachary
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5166-5438
  surname: Monge
  fullname: Monge, Zachary
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Simon W.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5943-0756
  surname: Davis
  fullname: Davis, Simon W.
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Roberto
  surname: Cabeza
  fullname: Cabeza, Roberto
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31974208$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkV9rHCEUxaWkNJs0XyEM9KUvs706rjpQCmVJmi1ptuTPs6jjtIYZnehMIN--TpMsbV7yJHp_53KO5wDt-eAtQscYlnhFqk_fL05uLrdX680Sc8ZKXC8JEHiDFnlal4QC3kMLIBxKRjndRwcp3QIAB8zfof0K15wSEAsk1yGOzqiu2N7b2KmhUL4pnh_LMzcMwah-yMDGjzYqM7rgU_Ez2saZsbiadLJ3k_VjcR0n-1d9qrpkix-2D_HhPXrbztejp_MQ3ZyeXK_PyvPtt83663lpKCVjyQWpQbVVg60hQnFVrYzWRnOhW9bylmkDzAphNCZspWuuczZqBTWAFW9EdYi-PO4dJt3bxmRDUXVyiK5X8UEG5eT_E-9-y1_hXnKgjK54XvDxaUEMOU8aZe-SsV2nvA1TkqTKRrlgos7ohxfobZiiz_EyxWoBFFdVpo7_dbSz8vz3GWCPgIkhpWjbHYJBziXLXclyLlniWs4lZ-HnF0LjRjX3kpO57jX5H1w7r8g
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2023_120220
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2023_120241
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2020_07_024
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2022_119442
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41539_024_00221_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2022_119597
crossref_primary_10_1093_cercor_bhac291
crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_84359
crossref_primary_10_1080_13825585_2022_2037500
crossref_primary_10_1093_sleep_zsae114
crossref_primary_10_3390_neurosci6010013
crossref_primary_10_1364_BOE_418229
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2025_121170
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurobiolaging_2022_01_011
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00429_023_02636_9
crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_02052
crossref_primary_10_18632_aging_204586
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13423_021_01983_0
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4194735
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurobiolaging_2024_11_012
crossref_primary_10_1080_09658211_2024_2418768
crossref_primary_10_1080_13825585_2021_2019184
Cites_doi 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3550-14.2015
10.1126/science.1193125
10.1073/pnas.1610686113
10.1093/cercor/bhl122
10.1093/cercor/bhv041
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.078
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3376-13.2014
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.028
10.1073/pnas.081082698
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.079
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2022-18.2019
10.1037/0096-1523.17.1.3
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.067
10.1093/cercor/bht194
10.1037/0033-295X.91.1.1
10.1101/lm.045765.117
10.3758/BF03210740
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.026
10.1002/hipo.450040319
10.1080/17588928.2018.1488244
10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.017
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.12.006
10.1037/0033-295X.110.4.611
10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00736.x
10.1002/hipo.20855
10.1037/0278-7393.14.4.700
10.1016/j.neures.2013.05.006
10.1093/cercor/bhy200
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.065
10.1101/lm.87605
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4889-12.2013
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.09.014
10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.419
10.1093/cercor/bhs143
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4286-15.2016
10.3389/fnagi.2014.00283
10.3758/BF03193596
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0425-16.2016
10.3389/neuro.01.016.2008
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.040
10.1038/nn1252
10.1101/lm.1845710
10.1073/pnas.1817925116
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.076
10.3758/BF03196177
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4328-13.2014
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0051-13.2013
10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00087-7
10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00096-X
10.1002/hipo.22598
10.1162/jocn_a_00740
10.1093/cercor/bhs258
10.1038/nn.3381
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3809-13.2013
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4156-12.2012
10.1016/B978-0-444-63622-5.00027-9
10.1037/a0019165
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4293-12.2013
10.1037//0033-295X.95.4.528
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2324-16.2017
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2020 the authors.
Copyright Society for Neuroscience Feb 26, 2020
Copyright © 2020 the authors 2020
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2020 the authors.
– notice: Copyright Society for Neuroscience Feb 26, 2020
– notice: Copyright © 2020 the authors 2020
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7QG
7QR
7TK
7U7
7U9
8FD
C1K
FR3
H94
P64
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1766-19.2020
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Chemoreception Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Toxicology Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Engineering Research Database
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Toxicology Abstracts
Animal Behavior Abstracts
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Chemoreception Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Neurosciences Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef

Virology and AIDS Abstracts
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1529-2401
EndPage 1930
ExternalDocumentID PMC7046457
31974208
10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1766_19_2020
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
-~X
.55
18M
2WC
34G
39C
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
AAFWJ
AAJMC
AAYXX
ABBAR
ABIVO
ACGUR
ACNCT
ADBBV
ADCOW
ADHGD
AENEX
AFCFT
AFOSN
AFSQR
AHWXS
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BTFSW
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
GX1
H13
HYE
H~9
KQ8
L7B
OK1
P0W
P2P
QZG
R.V
RHI
RPM
TFN
TR2
W8F
WH7
WOQ
X7M
YBU
YHG
YKV
YNH
YSK
NPM
7QG
7QR
7TK
7U7
7U9
8FD
C1K
FR3
H94
P64
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-78290af3d1ec28a7a35cbbcb78bf6f7f6bc06e88cb1265b97b0274e84c01a7d83
ISSN 0270-6474
1529-2401
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:22:42 EDT 2025
Sun Aug 24 04:11:01 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 16:40:25 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:03:19 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:15:48 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:56:23 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 9
Keywords recognition
fMRI
representational similarity analysis
false memory
hippocampus
encoding
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Copyright © 2020 the authors.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c442t-78290af3d1ec28a7a35cbbcb78bf6f7f6bc06e88cb1265b97b0274e84c01a7d83
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Author contributions: E.A.W., B.R.G., W.-C.W., Z.M., S.W.D., and R.C. designed research; E.A.W. performed research; E.A.W., B.R.G., W.-C.W., Z.M., S.W.D., and R.C. analyzed data; E.A.W. wrote the paper.
ORCID 0000-0002-5943-0756
0000-0002-5166-5438
OpenAccessLink https://www.jneurosci.org/content/jneuro/40/9/1920.full.pdf
PMID 31974208
PQID 2369804133
PQPubID 2049535
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7046457
proquest_miscellaneous_2344278689
proquest_journals_2369804133
pubmed_primary_31974208
crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1766_19_2020
crossref_citationtrail_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1766_19_2020
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-02-26
2020-Feb-26
20200226
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-02-26
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-02-26
  day: 26
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Baltimore
PublicationTitle The Journal of neuroscience
PublicationTitleAlternate J Neurosci
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Society for Neuroscience
Publisher_xml – name: Society for Neuroscience
References 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.25
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.24
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.23
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.22
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.29
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.28
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.27
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.26
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.60
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.21
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.20
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.14
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.58
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.13
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.57
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.12
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.56
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.11
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.55
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.18
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.17
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.16
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.15
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.59
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.19
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.50
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.10
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.54
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.53
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.52
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.51
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.47
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.46
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.45
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.44
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.49
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.48
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.43
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.42
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.41
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.40
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.36
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.35
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.8
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.34
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.9
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.33
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.39
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.38
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.37
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.2
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.3
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.1
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.6
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.7
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.4
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.5
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.32
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.31
2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.30
References_xml – ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.23
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3550-14.2015
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.56
  doi: 10.1126/science.1193125
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.5
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610686113
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.24
  doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl122
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.2
  doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv041
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.17
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.078
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.9
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3376-13.2014
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.48
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.028
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.4
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.081082698
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.10
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.079
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.3
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2022-18.2019
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.38
  doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.17.1.3
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.44
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.067
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.16
  doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht194
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.14
  doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.91.1.1
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.21
  doi: 10.1101/lm.045765.117
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.6
  doi: 10.3758/BF03210740
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.41
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.026
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.51
  doi: 10.1002/hipo.450040319
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.22
  doi: 10.1080/17588928.2018.1488244
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.45
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.017
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.29
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.12.006
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.36
  doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.4.611
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.15
  doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00736.x
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.35
  doi: 10.1002/hipo.20855
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.37
  doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.14.4.700
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.1
  doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2013.05.006
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.32
  doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy200
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.18
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.065
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.39
  doi: 10.1101/lm.87605
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.53
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4889-12.2013
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.13
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.09.014
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.33
  doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.419
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.57
  doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs143
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.31
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4286-15.2016
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.40
  doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00283
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.20
  doi: 10.3758/BF03193596
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.59
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0425-16.2016
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.27
  doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.016.2008
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.58
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.040
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.47
  doi: 10.1038/nn1252
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.50
  doi: 10.1101/lm.1845710
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.60
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817925116
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.34
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.076
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.43
  doi: 10.3758/BF03196177
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.28
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4328-13.2014
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.12
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0051-13.2013
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.26
  doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00087-7
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.46
  doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00096-X
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.52
  doi: 10.1002/hipo.22598
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.54
  doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00740
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.42
  doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs258
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.7
  doi: 10.1038/nn.3381
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.11
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3809-13.2013
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.49
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4156-12.2012
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.8
  doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63622-5.00027-9
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.25
  doi: 10.1037/a0019165
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.30
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4293-12.2013
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.19
  doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.95.4.528
– ident: 2023041803401091000_40.9.1920.55
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2324-16.2017
SSID ssj0007017
Score 2.464974
Snippet The declarative memory system allows us to accurately recognize a countless number of items and events, particularly those strengthened by repeated exposure....
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 1920
SubjectTerms Apples
Cortex
Familiarity
Hippocampus
Memory
Object recognition
Pictures
Reinstatement
Representations
Similarity
Target recognition
Visual discrimination
Title Cortical Overlap and Cortical-Hippocampal Interactions Predict Subsequent True and False Memory
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31974208
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2369804133
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2344278689
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7046457
Volume 40
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLbKkNBeEDAuhYGMhHip0uXixO5jKUzdEAXBpk28RHEuWmBNqy1FGn-Mv8c5tuOkoxKwl6hK4sbt9-X4HJ8bIa8Cj0lXMgGaW4AGimCODNzUYUHuF0JkmAuK0RazaHrMDk_D017vVydqaVXLYfpzY17JTVCFc4ArZsn-B7L2S-EEfAZ84QgIw_GfMJ4sLvRW9McfuC23VJ6A5qQzLZdLWKngfT_XG386h-ESwy6yMq2V0FCR1PXg6GKl_Qj7MGl40zH-ds3h26aQKeW1Uwazde6Y9iggWr8PxkMb2ZOXyufzJq--JfOyGny2l07MZvVJXjqTs5XlKQga3fH9a4JZYVfdrQmwQzHVO2q3Jjtxp7Pr09IizudgvDLdp2eYGxHsK5-P15XRuqST4eKoI3BBQXU7izeoo-7GhSFUBSoOZxgf-WVyMMS6mI6HmUr-2gAAeDlXdAHZxDH2oF0obfjipw8TrlzC_Ba57YN9gq0z3h68tyoAd1WrZ_vzTGo6TGJv8xS2yZ3meesK0h9Wz_Xg3Y42dHSP3DVMoGPNyfukl1cPyM64SurF_Iq-piqwWHlsdkjcMJIamlIgGt1EU9qlKTU0pS1NKdJUjVY0pZqmD8nx_rujydQxfT2clDG_djg675MiyLw89UXCkyBMpUwlF7KICl5EMnWjXIhUen4UyhGXuHeSC5a6XsIzETwiW9Wiyp8QKtAkBg5kGfNYFkZJJlkYFEEKejSs5WGfhM2fGaem6D32XjmP0fgFPGKLR4x4xN4oRjz6ZM-OW-qyL38dsdtgFRsRcRn7QTTCAl9B0Ccv7WUQ4OiVS6p8scJ7GLa7icSoTx5raO0jG070CV8D3d6AxeHXr1TlmSoSbwj69MYjn5Ht9p3eJVs1IPwcFPBavlBk_w2HhNpd
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cortical+Overlap+and+Cortical-Hippocampal+Interactions+Predict+Subsequent+True+and+False+Memory&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+neuroscience&rft.au=Wing%2C+Erik+A.&rft.au=Geib%2C+Benjamin+R.&rft.au=Wang%2C+Wei-Chun&rft.au=Monge%2C+Zachary&rft.date=2020-02-26&rft.pub=Society+for+Neuroscience&rft.issn=0270-6474&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1920&rft.epage=1930&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523%2FJNEUROSCI.1766-19.2020&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31974208&rft.externalDocID=PMC7046457
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0270-6474&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0270-6474&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0270-6474&client=summon