Interaural Place-of-Stimulation Mismatch Estimates Using CT Scans and Binaural Perception, But Not Pitch, Are Consistent in Cochlear-Implant Users
Bilateral cochlear implants (BI-CIs) or a CI for single-sided deafness (SSD-CI; one normally functioning acoustic ear) can partially restore spatial-hearing abilities, including sound localization and speech understanding in noise. For these populations, however, interaural place-of-stimulation mism...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of neuroscience Vol. 41; no. 49; pp. 10161 - 10178 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Society for Neuroscience
08.12.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0270-6474 1529-2401 1529-2401 |
DOI | 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0359-21.2021 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Bilateral cochlear implants (BI-CIs) or a CI for single-sided deafness (SSD-CI; one normally functioning acoustic ear) can partially restore spatial-hearing abilities, including sound localization and speech understanding in noise. For these populations, however, interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch can occur and thus diminish binaural sensitivity that relies on interaurally frequency-matched neurons. This study examined whether plasticity—reorganization of central neural pathways over time—can compensate for peripheral interaural place mismatch. We hypothesized differential plasticity across two systems: none for binaural processing but adaptation for pitch perception toward frequencies delivered by the specific electrodes. Interaural place mismatch was evaluated in 19 BI-CI and 23 SSD-CI human subjects (both sexes) using binaural processing (interaural-time-difference discrimination with simultaneous bilateral stimulation), pitch perception (pitch ranking for single electrodes or acoustic tones with sequential bilateral stimulation), and physical electrode-location estimates from computed-tomography (CT) scans. On average, CT scans revealed relatively little BI-CI interaural place mismatch (26° insertion-angle mismatch) but a relatively large SSD-CI mismatch, particularly at low frequencies (166° for an electrode tuned to 300 Hz, decreasing to 14° at 7000 Hz). For BI-CI subjects, the three metrics were in agreement because there was little mismatch. For SSD-CI subjects, binaural and CT measurements were in agreement, suggesting little binaural-system plasticity induced by mismatch. The pitch measurements disagreed with binaural and CT measurements, suggesting place-pitch plasticity or a procedural bias. These results suggest that reducing interaural place mismatch and potentially improving binaural processing by reprogramming the CI frequency allocation would be better done using CT-scan than pitch information.
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT
Electrode-array placement for cochlear implants (bionic prostheses that partially restore hearing) does not explicitly align neural representations of frequency information. The resulting interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch can diminish spatial-hearing abilities. In this study, adults with two cochlear implants showed reasonable interaural alignment, whereas those with one cochlear implant but normal hearing in the other ear often showed mismatch. In cases of mismatch, binaural sensitivity was best when the same cochlear locations were stimulated in both ears, suggesting that binaural brainstem pathways do not experience plasticity to compensate for mismatch. In contrast, interaurally pitch-matched electrodes deviated from cochlear-location estimates and did not optimize binaural sensitivity. Clinical correction of interaural place mismatch using binaural or computed-tomography (but not pitch) information may improve spatial-hearing benefits. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Bilateral cochlear implants (BI-CIs) or a CI for single-sided deafness (SSD-CI; one normally functioning acoustic ear) can partially restore spatial-hearing abilities, including sound localization and speech understanding in noise. For these populations, however, interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch can occur and thus diminish binaural sensitivity that relies on interaurally frequency-matched neurons. This study examined whether plasticity—reorganization of central neural pathways over time—can compensate for peripheral interaural place mismatch. We hypothesized differential plasticity across two systems: none for binaural processing but adaptation for pitch perception toward frequencies delivered by the specific electrodes. Interaural place mismatch was evaluated in 19 BI-CI and 23 SSD-CI human subjects (both sexes) using binaural processing (interaural-time-difference discrimination with simultaneous bilateral stimulation), pitch perception (pitch ranking for single electrodes or acoustic tones with sequential bilateral stimulation), and physical electrode-location estimates from computed-tomography (CT) scans. On average, CT scans revealed relatively little BI-CI interaural place mismatch (26° insertion-angle mismatch) but a relatively large SSD-CI mismatch, particularly at low frequencies (166° for an electrode tuned to 300 Hz, decreasing to 14° at 7000 Hz). For BI-CI subjects, the three metrics were in agreement because there was little mismatch. For SSD-CI subjects, binaural and CT measurements were in agreement, suggesting little binaural-system plasticity induced by mismatch. The pitch measurements disagreed with binaural and CT measurements, suggesting place-pitch plasticity or a procedural bias. These results suggest that reducing interaural place mismatch and potentially improving binaural processing by reprogramming the CI frequency allocation would be better done using CT-scan than pitch information.
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT
Electrode-array placement for cochlear implants (bionic prostheses that partially restore hearing) does not explicitly align neural representations of frequency information. The resulting interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch can diminish spatial-hearing abilities. In this study, adults with two cochlear implants showed reasonable interaural alignment, whereas those with one cochlear implant but normal hearing in the other ear often showed mismatch. In cases of mismatch, binaural sensitivity was best when the same cochlear locations were stimulated in both ears, suggesting that binaural brainstem pathways do not experience plasticity to compensate for mismatch. In contrast, interaurally pitch-matched electrodes deviated from cochlear-location estimates and did not optimize binaural sensitivity. Clinical correction of interaural place mismatch using binaural or computed-tomography (but not pitch) information may improve spatial-hearing benefits. Bilateral cochlear implants (BI-CIs) or a CI for single-sided deafness (SSD-CI; one normally functioning acoustic ear) can partially restore spatial-hearing abilities, including sound localization and speech understanding in noise. For these populations, however, interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch can occur and thus diminish binaural sensitivity that relies on interaurally frequency-matched neurons. This study examined whether plasticity-reorganization of central neural pathways over time-can compensate for peripheral interaural place mismatch. We hypothesized differential plasticity across two systems: none for binaural processing but adaptation for pitch perception toward frequencies delivered by the specific electrodes. Interaural place mismatch was evaluated in 19 BI-CI and 23 SSD-CI human subjects (both sexes) using binaural processing (interaural-time-difference discrimination with simultaneous bilateral stimulation), pitch perception (pitch ranking for single electrodes or acoustic tones with sequential bilateral stimulation), and physical electrode-location estimates from computed-tomography (CT) scans. On average, CT scans revealed relatively little BI-CI interaural place mismatch (26° insertion-angle mismatch) but a relatively large SSD-CI mismatch, particularly at low frequencies (166° for an electrode tuned to 300 Hz, decreasing to 14° at 7000 Hz). For BI-CI subjects, the three metrics were in agreement because there was little mismatch. For SSD-CI subjects, binaural and CT measurements were in agreement, suggesting little binaural-system plasticity induced by mismatch. The pitch measurements disagreed with binaural and CT measurements, suggesting place-pitch plasticity or a procedural bias. These results suggest that reducing interaural place mismatch and potentially improving binaural processing by reprogramming the CI frequency allocation would be better done using CT-scan than pitch information. Bilateral cochlear implants (BI-CIs) or a CI for single-sided deafness (SSD-CI; one normally functioning acoustic ear) can partially restore spatial-hearing abilities, including sound localization and speech understanding in noise. For these populations, however, interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch can occur and thus diminish binaural sensitivity that relies on interaurally frequency-matched neurons. This study examined whether plasticity-reorganization of central neural pathways over time-can compensate for peripheral interaural place mismatch. We hypothesized differential plasticity across two systems: none for binaural processing but adaptation for pitch perception toward frequencies delivered by the specific electrodes. Interaural place mismatch was evaluated in 19 BI-CI and 23 SSD-CI human subjects (both sexes) using binaural processing (interaural-time-difference discrimination with simultaneous bilateral stimulation), pitch perception (pitch ranking for single electrodes or acoustic tones with sequential bilateral stimulation), and physical electrode-location estimates from computed-tomography (CT) scans. On average, CT scans revealed relatively little BI-CI interaural place mismatch (26° insertion-angle mismatch) but a relatively large SSD-CI mismatch, particularly at low frequencies (166° for an electrode tuned to 300 Hz, decreasing to 14° at 7000 Hz). For BI-CI subjects, the three metrics were in agreement because there was little mismatch. For SSD-CI subjects, binaural and CT measurements were in agreement, suggesting little binaural-system plasticity induced by mismatch. The pitch measurements disagreed with binaural and CT measurements, suggesting place-pitch plasticity or a procedural bias. These results suggest that reducing interaural place mismatch and potentially improving binaural processing by reprogramming the CI frequency allocation would be better done using CT-scan than pitch information. Electrode-array placement for cochlear implants (bionic prostheses that partially restore hearing) does not explicitly align neural representations of frequency information. The resulting interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch can diminish spatial-hearing abilities. In this study, adults with two cochlear implants showed reasonable interaural alignment, whereas those with one cochlear implant but normal hearing in the other ear often showed mismatch. In cases of mismatch, binaural sensitivity was best when the same cochlear locations were stimulated in both ears, suggesting that binaural brainstem pathways do not experience plasticity to compensate for mismatch. In contrast, interaurally pitch-matched electrodes deviated from cochlear-location estimates and did not optimize binaural sensitivity. Clinical correction of interaural place mismatch using binaural or computed-tomography (but not pitch) information may improve spatial-hearing benefits. Bilateral cochlear implants (BI-CIs) or a CI for single-sided deafness (SSD-CI; one normally functioning acoustic ear) can partially restore spatial-hearing abilities, including sound localization and speech understanding in noise. For these populations, however, interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch can occur and thus diminish binaural sensitivity that relies on interaurally frequency-matched neurons. This study examined whether plasticity-reorganization of central neural pathways over time-can compensate for peripheral interaural place mismatch. We hypothesized differential plasticity across two systems: none for binaural processing but adaptation for pitch perception toward frequencies delivered by the specific electrodes. Interaural place mismatch was evaluated in 19 BI-CI and 23 SSD-CI human subjects (both sexes) using binaural processing (interaural-time-difference discrimination with simultaneous bilateral stimulation), pitch perception (pitch ranking for single electrodes or acoustic tones with sequential bilateral stimulation), and physical electrode-location estimates from computed-tomography (CT) scans. On average, CT scans revealed relatively little BI-CI interaural place mismatch (26° insertion-angle mismatch) but a relatively large SSD-CI mismatch, particularly at low frequencies (166° for an electrode tuned to 300 Hz, decreasing to 14° at 7000 Hz). For BI-CI subjects, the three metrics were in agreement because there was little mismatch. For SSD-CI subjects, binaural and CT measurements were in agreement, suggesting little binaural-system plasticity induced by mismatch. The pitch measurements disagreed with binaural and CT measurements, suggesting place-pitch plasticity or a procedural bias. These results suggest that reducing interaural place mismatch and potentially improving binaural processing by reprogramming the CI frequency allocation would be better done using CT-scan than pitch information.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Electrode-array placement for cochlear implants (bionic prostheses that partially restore hearing) does not explicitly align neural representations of frequency information. The resulting interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch can diminish spatial-hearing abilities. In this study, adults with two cochlear implants showed reasonable interaural alignment, whereas those with one cochlear implant but normal hearing in the other ear often showed mismatch. In cases of mismatch, binaural sensitivity was best when the same cochlear locations were stimulated in both ears, suggesting that binaural brainstem pathways do not experience plasticity to compensate for mismatch. In contrast, interaurally pitch-matched electrodes deviated from cochlear-location estimates and did not optimize binaural sensitivity. Clinical correction of interaural place mismatch using binaural or computed-tomography (but not pitch) information may improve spatial-hearing benefits.Bilateral cochlear implants (BI-CIs) or a CI for single-sided deafness (SSD-CI; one normally functioning acoustic ear) can partially restore spatial-hearing abilities, including sound localization and speech understanding in noise. For these populations, however, interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch can occur and thus diminish binaural sensitivity that relies on interaurally frequency-matched neurons. This study examined whether plasticity-reorganization of central neural pathways over time-can compensate for peripheral interaural place mismatch. We hypothesized differential plasticity across two systems: none for binaural processing but adaptation for pitch perception toward frequencies delivered by the specific electrodes. Interaural place mismatch was evaluated in 19 BI-CI and 23 SSD-CI human subjects (both sexes) using binaural processing (interaural-time-difference discrimination with simultaneous bilateral stimulation), pitch perception (pitch ranking for single electrodes or acoustic tones with sequential bilateral stimulation), and physical electrode-location estimates from computed-tomography (CT) scans. On average, CT scans revealed relatively little BI-CI interaural place mismatch (26° insertion-angle mismatch) but a relatively large SSD-CI mismatch, particularly at low frequencies (166° for an electrode tuned to 300 Hz, decreasing to 14° at 7000 Hz). For BI-CI subjects, the three metrics were in agreement because there was little mismatch. For SSD-CI subjects, binaural and CT measurements were in agreement, suggesting little binaural-system plasticity induced by mismatch. The pitch measurements disagreed with binaural and CT measurements, suggesting place-pitch plasticity or a procedural bias. These results suggest that reducing interaural place mismatch and potentially improving binaural processing by reprogramming the CI frequency allocation would be better done using CT-scan than pitch information.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Electrode-array placement for cochlear implants (bionic prostheses that partially restore hearing) does not explicitly align neural representations of frequency information. The resulting interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch can diminish spatial-hearing abilities. In this study, adults with two cochlear implants showed reasonable interaural alignment, whereas those with one cochlear implant but normal hearing in the other ear often showed mismatch. In cases of mismatch, binaural sensitivity was best when the same cochlear locations were stimulated in both ears, suggesting that binaural brainstem pathways do not experience plasticity to compensate for mismatch. In contrast, interaurally pitch-matched electrodes deviated from cochlear-location estimates and did not optimize binaural sensitivity. Clinical correction of interaural place mismatch using binaural or computed-tomography (but not pitch) information may improve spatial-hearing benefits. |
Author | Noble, Jack H. Hoa, Michael Bernstein, Joshua G.W. Stakhovskaya, Olga A. Cleary, Miranda Jensen, Kenneth K. Shih, Robert Kolberg, Elizabeth Kim, H. Jeffery Goupell, Matthew J. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Joshua G.W. surname: Bernstein fullname: Bernstein, Joshua G.W. – sequence: 2 givenname: Kenneth K. surname: Jensen fullname: Jensen, Kenneth K. – sequence: 3 givenname: Olga A. surname: Stakhovskaya fullname: Stakhovskaya, Olga A. – sequence: 4 givenname: Jack H. surname: Noble fullname: Noble, Jack H. – sequence: 5 givenname: Michael surname: Hoa fullname: Hoa, Michael – sequence: 6 givenname: H. Jeffery surname: Kim fullname: Kim, H. Jeffery – sequence: 7 givenname: Robert surname: Shih fullname: Shih, Robert – sequence: 8 givenname: Elizabeth surname: Kolberg fullname: Kolberg, Elizabeth – sequence: 9 givenname: Miranda surname: Cleary fullname: Cleary, Miranda – sequence: 10 givenname: Matthew J. surname: Goupell fullname: Goupell, Matthew J. |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34725189$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFUsFu1DAQtVAR3RZ-obLEhUOz2E7sJBJCaqMtLCptxXbP1tRxuq4Se7EdJH6DL65DlxX0wsmamffG72neETqwzmqETiiZU87y91-uFutv16tmOSc5rzNG54ww-gLN0jSVBaEHaEZYSTJRlMUhOgrhgRBSElq-Qod5UTJOq3qGfi1t1B5GDz2-6UHpzHXZKpph7CEaZ_FXEwaIaoMXIXUh6oDXwdh73NzilQIbMNgWnxu726G90tuJeYrPx4ivXMQ3JvFP8ZnXuHE2mBC1jdjYVKlNr8Fny2HbQ-qtg_bhNXrZQR_0m917jNYXi9vmc3Z5_WnZnF1mqihYzDjnTBPBFRQFVIToHDhAcsBVnpeiLbsKOKnu2jZBgNVK8JoJ6IRou5blND9GH5_2bse7QbcqiUoO5NYnm_6ndGDkvxNrNvLe_ZCVEIQUPC14t1vg3fdRhygHE5TukxXtxiBZ-jAnouJ1gr59Bn1wo7fJnmSC0ppWJZ8UnfytaC_lz7kSQDwBlHcheN3tIZTIKRdynws55UIyKqdcJOKHZ0Rl4u8DJ2em_x_9Efb3wTQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s00405_023_08002_z crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0030476 crossref_primary_10_1177_23312165221108259 crossref_primary_10_1177_23312165221129165 crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0013746 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00106_023_01308_8 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci12020253 crossref_primary_10_1177_23312165241271340 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2024_109088 crossref_primary_10_1097_AUD_0000000000001390 crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0016365 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_918914 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00405_024_08984_4 crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0017705 crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0017603 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00405_023_07845_w crossref_primary_10_1097_MAO_0000000000003538 crossref_primary_10_1002_lary_32026 crossref_primary_10_1097_MAO_0000000000003653 crossref_primary_10_1177_23312165241229880 |
Cites_doi | 10.3766/jaaa.15063 10.1121/1.399052 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000864 10.3766/jaaa.23.6.9 10.1007/s10162-019-00733-3 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-09-03473.1992 10.7554/eLife.12264 10.1121/10.0001305 10.1177/2331216516668302 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000470 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0087 10.1007/s10162-010-0222-7 10.1002/lary.21104 10.1007/s10162-007-0077-8 10.1109/42.563664 10.1177/1084713810375249 10.1006/cviu.1995.1004 10.1371/journal.pone.0235504 10.1177/2331216521997324 10.1016/j.media.2019.101553 10.1007/s00247-018-4281-y 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3795-15.2016 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000135 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.10.024 10.1121/1.5001903 10.1109/TBME.2011.2160262 10.1007/s10162-007-0076-9 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000163 10.1016/j.heares.2014.08.005 10.1121/1.4892764 10.1002/cne.902820311 10.1159/000313329 10.1007/s10162-018-00707-x 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000174 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181d279e0 10.1016/j.heares.2015.08.010 10.1121/1.4820889 10.1177/2331216515617143 10.1007/s10162-018-00697-w 10.1002/lary.20859 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000784 10.1007/s10162-013-0437-5 10.3389/fnins.2019.01119 10.1121/1.3283014 10.1121/1.3158821 10.1016/j.heares.2013.11.003 10.1080/00016480310000593 10.1007/s10162-016-0557-9 10.1002/cphy.c180036 10.1088/1741-2560/6/6/065008 10.1121/1.4792936 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0850-05.2005 10.1016/j.media.2014.02.001 10.1016/j.media.2018.11.005 10.1007/s10162-016-0569-5 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000374 10.1177/2331216518771173 10.1007/s10162-007-0088-5 10.1073/pnas.081082598 10.1097/00003446-200506000-00002 10.1121/1.1572146 10.1101/2021.02.26.21252533 10.1121/1.423088 10.1177/2331216518765514 10.1038/nature01002 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000114 10.1097/mao.0b013e3181925025 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001469 10.1007/s10162-014-0457-9 10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.045 10.1121/1.423107 10.1148/radiol.2020192256 10.1038/159591a0 10.1007/s10162-013-0380-5 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000284 10.1093/rpd/ncp162 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2021 the authors. Copyright Society for Neuroscience Dec 8, 2021 Copyright © 2021 the authors 2021 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2021 the authors. – notice: Copyright Society for Neuroscience Dec 8, 2021 – notice: Copyright © 2021 the authors 2021 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7QR 7TK 7U7 7U9 8FD C1K FR3 H94 P64 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0359-21.2021 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Animal Behavior Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Toxicology Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Virology and AIDS Abstracts Technology Research Database Toxicology Abstracts Animal Behavior Abstracts AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Engineering Research Database Neurosciences Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Virology and AIDS Abstracts MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1529-2401 |
EndPage | 10178 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC8660045 34725189 10_1523_JNEUROSCI_0359_21_2021 |
Genre | Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NIDCD NIH HHS grantid: R01 DC014037 – fundername: NIDCD NIH HHS grantid: R01 DC015798 – fundername: ; grantid: R01 DC015798; R01 DC014037 |
GroupedDBID | --- -DZ -~X .55 18M 2WC 34G 39C 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS AAFWJ AAJMC AAYXX ABBAR ABIVO ACGUR ACNCT ADBBV ADCOW ADHGD AENEX AFCFT AFOSN AFSQR AHWXS ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BTFSW CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD F5P GX1 H13 HYE H~9 KQ8 L7B OK1 P0W P2P QZG R.V RHI RPM TFN TR2 W8F WH7 WOQ X7M YBU YHG YKV YNH YSK CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7QR 7TK 7U7 7U9 8FD C1K FR3 H94 P64 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5552e065ca44a800e3a5aaace5c3376d7f8a508bdd5caa29c65926af66dfd2313 |
ISSN | 0270-6474 1529-2401 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 14:12:03 EDT 2025 Sun Aug 24 04:11:17 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 13:41:01 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:00:55 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:16:00 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:53:49 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 49 |
Keywords | interaural time difference plasticity brainstem superior olivary complex binaural mismatch |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Copyright © 2021 the authors. SfN exclusive license. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c442t-5552e065ca44a800e3a5aaace5c3376d7f8a508bdd5caa29c65926af66dfd2313 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Author contributions: J.G.W.B., K.K.J., O.A.S., J.H.N., M.H., H.J.K., and M.J.G. designed research; J.G.W.B., K.K.J., O.A.S., J.H.N., M.H., H.J.K., R.S., E.K., M.C., and M.J.G. performed research; J.G.W.B., K.K.J., O.A.S., J.H.N., M.C., and M.J.G. analyzed data; and J.G.W.B. and M.J.G. wrote the paper. |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.jneurosci.org/content/jneuro/41/49/10161.full.pdf |
PMID | 34725189 |
PQID | 2611918751 |
PQPubID | 2049535 |
PageCount | 18 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8660045 proquest_miscellaneous_2592306859 proquest_journals_2611918751 pubmed_primary_34725189 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_0359_21_2021 crossref_citationtrail_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_0359_21_2021 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-12-08 20211208 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-12-08 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2021 text: 2021-12-08 day: 08 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Baltimore |
PublicationTitle | The Journal of neuroscience |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Neurosci |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Society for Neuroscience |
Publisher_xml | – name: Society for Neuroscience |
References | 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.19 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.21 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.65 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.20 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.64 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.9 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.63 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.8 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.62 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.61 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.60 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.29 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.28 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.27 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.26 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.25 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.69 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.24 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.68 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.23 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.67 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.22 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.66 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.3 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.2 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.7 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.6 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.5 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.4 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.32 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.76 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.31 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.75 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.30 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.74 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.72 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.71 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.70 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.39 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.38 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.37 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.36 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.35 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.34 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.33 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.43 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.42 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.40 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.49 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.48 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.47 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.46 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.45 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.44 Adel (2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.1) 2019; 13 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.10 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.54 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.53 Yin (2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.73) 2019; 9 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.52 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.51 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.50 Landsberger (2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.41) 2015; 36 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.18 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.17 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.16 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.15 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.59 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.14 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.58 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.13 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.57 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.12 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.56 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.11 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.55 |
References_xml | – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.67 doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15063 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.32 doi: 10.1121/1.399052 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.11 doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000864 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.43 doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.6.9 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.3 doi: 10.1007/s10162-019-00733-3 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.49 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-09-03473.1992 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.40 doi: 10.7554/eLife.12264 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.18 doi: 10.1121/10.0001305 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.2 doi: 10.1177/2331216516668302 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.29 doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000470 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.54 doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0087 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.12 doi: 10.1007/s10162-010-0222-7 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.60 doi: 10.1002/lary.21104 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.55 doi: 10.1007/s10162-007-0077-8 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.46 doi: 10.1109/42.563664 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.8 doi: 10.1177/1084713810375249 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.15 doi: 10.1006/cviu.1995.1004 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.47 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235504 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.35 doi: 10.1177/2331216521997324 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.71 doi: 10.1016/j.media.2019.101553 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.26 doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4281-y – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.13 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3795-15.2016 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.38 doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000135 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.56 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.10.024 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.65 doi: 10.1121/1.5001903 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.50 doi: 10.1109/TBME.2011.2160262 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.64 doi: 10.1007/s10162-007-0076-9 – volume: 36 start-page: 207 year: 2015 ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.41 article-title: The relationship between insertion angles, default frequency allocations, and spiral ganglion place pitch in cochlear implants publication-title: Ear Hear doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000163 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.36 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.08.005 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.14 doi: 10.1121/1.4892764 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.58 doi: 10.1002/cne.902820311 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.22 doi: 10.1159/000313329 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.30 doi: 10.1007/s10162-018-00707-x – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.21 doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000174 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.69 doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181d279e0 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.75 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.08.010 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.37 doi: 10.1121/1.4820889 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.34 doi: 10.1177/2331216515617143 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.24 doi: 10.1007/s10162-018-00697-w – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.51 doi: 10.1002/lary.20859 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.61 doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000784 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.45 doi: 10.1007/s10162-013-0437-5 – volume: 13 start-page: 1119 year: 2019 ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.1 article-title: Pitch matching in cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness: effects of electrode position and acoustic stimulus type publication-title: Front Neurosci doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01119 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.27 doi: 10.1121/1.3283014 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.52 doi: 10.1121/1.3158821 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.59 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.11.003 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.66 doi: 10.1080/00016480310000593 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.17 doi: 10.1007/s10162-016-0557-9 – volume: 9 start-page: 1503 year: 2019 ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.73 article-title: Neural mechanisms of binaural processing in the auditory brainstem publication-title: Compr Physiol doi: 10.1002/cphy.c180036 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.20 doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/6/6/065008 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.28 doi: 10.1121/1.4792936 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.68 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0850-05.2005 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.53 doi: 10.1016/j.media.2014.02.001 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.74 doi: 10.1016/j.media.2018.11.005 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.16 doi: 10.1007/s10162-016-0569-5 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.72 doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000374 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.10 doi: 10.1177/2331216518771173 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.9 doi: 10.1007/s10162-007-0088-5 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.76 doi: 10.1073/pnas.081082598 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.44 doi: 10.1097/00003446-200506000-00002 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.4 doi: 10.1121/1.1572146 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.31 doi: 10.1101/2021.02.26.21252533 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.62 doi: 10.1121/1.423088 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.7 doi: 10.1177/2331216518765514 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.42 doi: 10.1038/nature01002 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.57 doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000114 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.19 doi: 10.1097/mao.0b013e3181925025 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.6 doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001469 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.23 doi: 10.1007/s10162-014-0457-9 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.39 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.045 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.63 doi: 10.1121/1.423107 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.48 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192256 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.25 doi: 10.1038/159591a0 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.33 doi: 10.1007/s10162-013-0380-5 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.5 doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000284 – ident: 2023041803494222000_41.49.10161.70 doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncp162 |
SSID | ssj0007017 |
Score | 2.4866805 |
Snippet | Bilateral cochlear implants (BI-CIs) or a CI for single-sided deafness (SSD-CI; one normally functioning acoustic ear) can partially restore spatial-hearing... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 10161 |
SubjectTerms | Adaptation, Physiological - physiology Adult Aged Cochlea Cochlear Implantation Cochlear Implants Computed tomography Deafness Electrodes Estimates Female Frequency Hearing loss Humans Localization Male Medical imaging Middle Aged Neuronal Plasticity - physiology Neuroplasticity Perception Pitch Pitch Perception - physiology Plastic properties Plasticity Sensory stimulation Sound localization Speech perception Timing Tomography, X-Ray Computed Transplants & implants |
Title | Interaural Place-of-Stimulation Mismatch Estimates Using CT Scans and Binaural Perception, But Not Pitch, Are Consistent in Cochlear-Implant Users |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34725189 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2611918751 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2592306859 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8660045 |
Volume | 41 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLbKeOEFAeNSGMhIiJcs3erESfZYqo5RtmxoqdS3yHUcGnVNUJsijZ_BL-MncXxpkpaK20tUxUns9Ptin3N8Lgi9SSnI_DRNbZdwOIBEak_IcWJz1wk44YnjMmmHvAi9s5E7HNNxq_Wj4bW0Kicd_m1nXMn_oArnAFcZJfsPyFYPhRPwG_CFIyAMx7_CWJnzmEqccSXN4XaR2tdlNjcluayLbAkCKZ9aA_iQ51KqtLSLQD-CjxoWKbV18C7LzTMqJxeF-qq0wqK0rrJSl4vqLYSu7wnEyEsdLsinsuyELXMMA0TwdONQv5Z368gzJfM2smfWu_liASKqqbk5LJbTFbPeV5afociNjchEEDXssiWbTYuvyxm7VRLw5c1nVptmQ1koR_sB85kJwTDWDdJVniJBbd1suK6G20PUsyTxQf91damfjjCzOFHbRt3mNK_zaxk66zSpZtKWBozuzuWEqrQWw1B6VV73P3RkvkObSLOCDuvezN8dXsano_PzOBqMozvoLgHFRS4VHz_V-ev9Y1UDuhq0iVmHfo5297IpLv2iA2278jZko-gBum8Axj3N0IeoJfJHaL-Xs7KY3-K3WLkZq_2bffS9Ji3eRVq8Ji2uSIsVaXE_woq0GEiL16TFNWkPMVAWA2WxouwhjEfgmrA4y_E2YbEi7GM0Oh1E_TPbFAaBKcQlpU0pJQJkZ85cl4HGIxxGGYMRU-7Agpn4acBA8ZgkCVzCyAmXvgMeSz0vSRNQaJwnaC8vcvEMYUEdxpnTTQhN3AnIu2niT6SS4xKWiOOgjej6_4-5yZovi7fcxFJ7BtziCrdY4haTbixxa6Oj6r4vOm_MH-84WMMbmzlmGRNPJmAMfArNr6tmWAHkth7LRbGCa-DlQPEP6EkbPdVsqLp0XB8UmABa_A2eVBfI7PKbLXk2VVnmA8-T-t7z3w_rBbpXf7YHaK9crMRLENPLySvF_J9TBeuZ |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interaural+Place-of-Stimulation+Mismatch+Estimates+Using+CT+Scans+and+Binaural+Perception%2C+But+Not+Pitch%2C+Are+Consistent+in+Cochlear-Implant+Users&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+neuroscience&rft.au=Bernstein%2C+Joshua+GW&rft.au=Jensen%2C+Kenneth+K&rft.au=Stakhovskaya%2C+Olga+A&rft.au=Noble%2C+Jack+H&rft.date=2021-12-08&rft.pub=Society+for+Neuroscience&rft.issn=0270-6474&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=49&rft.spage=10161&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523%2FJNEUROSCI.0359-21.2021&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0270-6474&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0270-6474&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0270-6474&client=summon |