A Review on Signal Processing Approaches to Reduce Calibration Time in EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface

In an electroencephalogram- (EEG-) based brain–computer interface (BCI), a subject can directly communicate with an electronic device using his EEG signals in a safe and convenient way. However, the sensitivity to noise/artifact and the non-stationarity of EEG signals result in high inter-subject/se...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in neuroscience Vol. 15; p. 733546
Main Authors Huang, Xin, Xu, Yilu, Hua, Jing, Yi, Wenlong, Yin, Hua, Hu, Ronghua, Wang, Shiyi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 19.08.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In an electroencephalogram- (EEG-) based brain–computer interface (BCI), a subject can directly communicate with an electronic device using his EEG signals in a safe and convenient way. However, the sensitivity to noise/artifact and the non-stationarity of EEG signals result in high inter-subject/session variability. Therefore, each subject usually spends long and tedious calibration time in building a subject-specific classifier. To solve this problem, we review existing signal processing approaches, including transfer learning (TL), semi-supervised learning (SSL), and a combination of TL and SSL. Cross-subject TL can transfer amounts of labeled samples from different source subjects for the target subject. Moreover, Cross-session/task/device TL can reduce the calibration time of the subject for the target session, task, or device by importing the labeled samples from the source sessions, tasks, or devices. SSL simultaneously utilizes the labeled and unlabeled samples from the target subject. The combination of TL and SSL can take advantage of each other. For each kind of signal processing approaches, we introduce their concepts and representative methods. The experimental results show that TL, SSL, and their combination can obtain good classification performance by effectively utilizing the samples available. In the end, we draw a conclusion and point to research directions in the future.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Wenjuan Liao, University of Colorado, United States; Zhen Shen, Nanyang Institute of Technology, China
This article was submitted to Brain Imaging Methods, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience
Edited by: Yizhang Jiang, Jiangnan University, China
ISSN:1662-453X
1662-4548
1662-453X
DOI:10.3389/fnins.2021.733546