Luminance Contrast Shifts Dominance Balance between ON and OFF Pathways in Human Vision

Human vision processes light and dark stimuli in visual scenes with separate ON and OFF neuronal pathways. In nature, stimuli lighter or darker than their local surround have different spatial properties and contrast distributions (Ratliff et al., 2010; Cooper and Norcia, 2015; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of neuroscience Vol. 43; no. 6; pp. 993 - 1007
Main Authors Rahimi-Nasrabadi, Hamed, Moore-Stoll, Veronica, Tan, Jia, Dellostritto, Stephen, Jin, JianZhong, Dul, Mitchell W., Alonso, Jose-Manuel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Society for Neuroscience 08.02.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0270-6474
1529-2401
1529-2401
DOI10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1672-22.2022

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Human vision processes light and dark stimuli in visual scenes with separate ON and OFF neuronal pathways. In nature, stimuli lighter or darker than their local surround have different spatial properties and contrast distributions (Ratliff et al., 2010; Cooper and Norcia, 2015; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). Similarly, in human vision, we show that luminance contrast affects the perception of lights and darks differently. At high contrast, human subjects of both sexes locate dark stimuli faster and more accurately than light stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the OFF pathway. However, at low contrast, they locate light stimuli faster and more accurately than dark stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the ON pathway. Luminance contrast was strongly correlated with multiple ON/OFF dominance ratios estimated from light/dark ratios of performance errors, missed targets, or reaction times (RTs). All correlations could be demonstrated at multiple eccentricities of the central visual field with an ON-OFF perimetry test implemented in a head-mounted visual display. We conclude that high-contrast stimuli are processed faster and more accurately by OFF pathways than ON pathways. However, the OFF dominance shifts toward ON dominance when stimulus contrast decreases, as expected from the higher-contrast sensitivity of ON cortical pathways (Kremkow et al., 2014; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). The results highlight the importance of contrast polarity in visual field measurements and predict a loss of low-contrast vision in humans with ON pathway deficits, as demonstrated in animal models (Sarnaik et al., 2014). SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT ON and OFF retino-thalamo-cortical pathways respond differently to luminance contrast. In both animal models and humans, low contrasts drive stronger responses from ON pathways, whereas high contrasts drive stronger responses from OFF pathways. We demonstrate that these ON-OFF pathway differences have a correlate in human vision. At low contrast, humans locate light targets faster and more accurately than dark targets but, as contrast increases, dark targets become more visible than light targets. We also demonstrate that contrast is strongly correlated with multiple light/dark ratios of visual performance in central vision. These results provide a link between neuronal physiology and human vision while emphasizing the importance of stimulus polarity in measurements of visual fields and contrast sensitivity.
AbstractList Human vision processes light and dark stimuli in visual scenes with separate ON and OFF neuronal pathways. In nature, stimuli lighter or darker than their local surround have different spatial properties and contrast distributions ( Ratliff et al., 2010 ; Cooper and Norcia, 2015 ; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021 ). Similarly, in human vision, we show that luminance contrast affects the perception of lights and darks differently. At high contrast, human subjects of both sexes locate dark stimuli faster and more accurately than light stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the OFF pathway. However, at low contrast, they locate light stimuli faster and more accurately than dark stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the ON pathway. Luminance contrast was strongly correlated with multiple ON/OFF dominance ratios estimated from light/dark ratios of performance errors, missed targets, or reaction times (RTs). All correlations could be demonstrated at multiple eccentricities of the central visual field with an ON-OFF perimetry test implemented in a head-mounted visual display. We conclude that high-contrast stimuli are processed faster and more accurately by OFF pathways than ON pathways. However, the OFF dominance shifts toward ON dominance when stimulus contrast decreases, as expected from the higher-contrast sensitivity of ON cortical pathways ( Kremkow et al., 2014 ; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021 ). The results highlight the importance of contrast polarity in visual field measurements and predict a loss of low-contrast vision in humans with ON pathway deficits, as demonstrated in animal models ( Sarnaik et al., 2014 ). SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT ON and OFF retino-thalamo-cortical pathways respond differently to luminance contrast. In both animal models and humans, low contrasts drive stronger responses from ON pathways, whereas high contrasts drive stronger responses from OFF pathways. We demonstrate that these ON-OFF pathway differences have a correlate in human vision. At low contrast, humans locate light targets faster and more accurately than dark targets but, as contrast increases, dark targets become more visible than light targets. We also demonstrate that contrast is strongly correlated with multiple light/dark ratios of visual performance in central vision. These results provide a link between neuronal physiology and human vision while emphasizing the importance of stimulus polarity in measurements of visual fields and contrast sensitivity.
Human vision processes light and dark stimuli in visual scenes with separate ON and OFF neuronal pathways. In nature, stimuli lighter or darker than their local surround have different spatial properties and contrast distributions (Ratliff et al., 2010; Cooper and Norcia, 2015; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). Similarly, in human vision, we show that luminance contrast affects the perception of lights and darks differently. At high contrast, human subjects of both sexes locate dark stimuli faster and more accurately than light stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the OFF pathway. However, at low contrast, they locate light stimuli faster and more accurately than dark stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the ON pathway. Luminance contrast was strongly correlated with multiple ON/OFF dominance ratios estimated from light/dark ratios of performance errors, missed targets, or reaction times (RTs). All correlations could be demonstrated at multiple eccentricities of the central visual field with an ON-OFF perimetry test implemented in a head-mounted visual display. We conclude that high-contrast stimuli are processed faster and more accurately by OFF pathways than ON pathways. However, the OFF dominance shifts toward ON dominance when stimulus contrast decreases, as expected from the higher-contrast sensitivity of ON cortical pathways (Kremkow et al., 2014; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). The results highlight the importance of contrast polarity in visual field measurements and predict a loss of low-contrast vision in humans with ON pathway deficits, as demonstrated in animal models (Sarnaik et al., 2014).
Human vision processes light and dark stimuli in visual scenes with separate ON and OFF neuronal pathways. In nature, stimuli lighter or darker than their local surround have different spatial properties and contrast distributions (Ratliff et al., 2010; Cooper and Norcia, 2015; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). Similarly, in human vision, we show that luminance contrast affects the perception of lights and darks differently. At high contrast, human subjects of both sexes locate dark stimuli faster and more accurately than light stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the OFF pathway. However, at low contrast, they locate light stimuli faster and more accurately than dark stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the ON pathway. Luminance contrast was strongly correlated with multiple ON/OFF dominance ratios estimated from light/dark ratios of performance errors, missed targets, or reaction times (RTs). All correlations could be demonstrated at multiple eccentricities of the central visual field with an ON-OFF perimetry test implemented in a head-mounted visual display. We conclude that high-contrast stimuli are processed faster and more accurately by OFF pathways than ON pathways. However, the OFF dominance shifts toward ON dominance when stimulus contrast decreases, as expected from the higher-contrast sensitivity of ON cortical pathways (Kremkow et al., 2014; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). The results highlight the importance of contrast polarity in visual field measurements and predict a loss of low-contrast vision in humans with ON pathway deficits, as demonstrated in animal models (Sarnaik et al., 2014).SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT ON and OFF retino-thalamo-cortical pathways respond differently to luminance contrast. In both animal models and humans, low contrasts drive stronger responses from ON pathways, whereas high contrasts drive stronger responses from OFF pathways. We demonstrate that these ON-OFF pathway differences have a correlate in human vision. At low contrast, humans locate light targets faster and more accurately than dark targets but, as contrast increases, dark targets become more visible than light targets. We also demonstrate that contrast is strongly correlated with multiple light/dark ratios of visual performance in central vision. These results provide a link between neuronal physiology and human vision while emphasizing the importance of stimulus polarity in measurements of visual fields and contrast sensitivity.Human vision processes light and dark stimuli in visual scenes with separate ON and OFF neuronal pathways. In nature, stimuli lighter or darker than their local surround have different spatial properties and contrast distributions (Ratliff et al., 2010; Cooper and Norcia, 2015; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). Similarly, in human vision, we show that luminance contrast affects the perception of lights and darks differently. At high contrast, human subjects of both sexes locate dark stimuli faster and more accurately than light stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the OFF pathway. However, at low contrast, they locate light stimuli faster and more accurately than dark stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the ON pathway. Luminance contrast was strongly correlated with multiple ON/OFF dominance ratios estimated from light/dark ratios of performance errors, missed targets, or reaction times (RTs). All correlations could be demonstrated at multiple eccentricities of the central visual field with an ON-OFF perimetry test implemented in a head-mounted visual display. We conclude that high-contrast stimuli are processed faster and more accurately by OFF pathways than ON pathways. However, the OFF dominance shifts toward ON dominance when stimulus contrast decreases, as expected from the higher-contrast sensitivity of ON cortical pathways (Kremkow et al., 2014; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). The results highlight the importance of contrast polarity in visual field measurements and predict a loss of low-contrast vision in humans with ON pathway deficits, as demonstrated in animal models (Sarnaik et al., 2014).SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT ON and OFF retino-thalamo-cortical pathways respond differently to luminance contrast. In both animal models and humans, low contrasts drive stronger responses from ON pathways, whereas high contrasts drive stronger responses from OFF pathways. We demonstrate that these ON-OFF pathway differences have a correlate in human vision. At low contrast, humans locate light targets faster and more accurately than dark targets but, as contrast increases, dark targets become more visible than light targets. We also demonstrate that contrast is strongly correlated with multiple light/dark ratios of visual performance in central vision. These results provide a link between neuronal physiology and human vision while emphasizing the importance of stimulus polarity in measurements of visual fields and contrast sensitivity.
Human vision processes light and dark stimuli in visual scenes with separate ON and OFF neuronal pathways. In nature, stimuli lighter or darker than their local surround have different spatial properties and contrast distributions (Ratliff et al., 2010; Cooper and Norcia, 2015; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). Similarly, in human vision, we show that luminance contrast affects the perception of lights and darks differently. At high contrast, human subjects of both sexes locate dark stimuli faster and more accurately than light stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the OFF pathway. However, at low contrast, they locate light stimuli faster and more accurately than dark stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the ON pathway. Luminance contrast was strongly correlated with multiple ON/OFF dominance ratios estimated from light/dark ratios of performance errors, missed targets, or reaction times (RTs). All correlations could be demonstrated at multiple eccentricities of the central visual field with an ON-OFF perimetry test implemented in a head-mounted visual display. We conclude that high-contrast stimuli are processed faster and more accurately by OFF pathways than ON pathways. However, the OFF dominance shifts toward ON dominance when stimulus contrast decreases, as expected from the higher-contrast sensitivity of ON cortical pathways (Kremkow et al., 2014; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). The results highlight the importance of contrast polarity in visual field measurements and predict a loss of low-contrast vision in humans with ON pathway deficits, as demonstrated in animal models (Sarnaik et al., 2014). SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT ON and OFF retino-thalamo-cortical pathways respond differently to luminance contrast. In both animal models and humans, low contrasts drive stronger responses from ON pathways, whereas high contrasts drive stronger responses from OFF pathways. We demonstrate that these ON-OFF pathway differences have a correlate in human vision. At low contrast, humans locate light targets faster and more accurately than dark targets but, as contrast increases, dark targets become more visible than light targets. We also demonstrate that contrast is strongly correlated with multiple light/dark ratios of visual performance in central vision. These results provide a link between neuronal physiology and human vision while emphasizing the importance of stimulus polarity in measurements of visual fields and contrast sensitivity.
Human vision processes light and dark stimuli in visual scenes with separate ON and OFF neuronal pathways. In nature, stimuli lighter or darker than their local surround have different spatial properties and contrast distributions (Ratliff et al., 2010; Cooper and Norcia, 2015; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). Similarly, in human vision, we show that luminance contrast affects the perception of lights and darks differently. At high contrast, human subjects of both sexes locate dark stimuli faster and more accurately than light stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the OFF pathway. However, at low contrast, they locate light stimuli faster and more accurately than dark stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the ON pathway. Luminance contrast was strongly correlated with multiple ON/OFF dominance ratios estimated from light/dark ratios of performance errors, missed targets, or reaction times (RTs). All correlations could be demonstrated at multiple eccentricities of the central visual field with an ON-OFF perimetry test implemented in a head-mounted visual display. We conclude that high-contrast stimuli are processed faster and more accurately by OFF pathways than ON pathways. However, the OFF dominance shifts toward ON dominance when stimulus contrast decreases, as expected from the higher-contrast sensitivity of ON cortical pathways (Kremkow et al., 2014; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). The results highlight the importance of contrast polarity in visual field measurements and predict a loss of low-contrast vision in humans with ON pathway deficits, as demonstrated in animal models (Sarnaik et al., 2014). ON and OFF retino-thalamo-cortical pathways respond differently to luminance contrast. In both animal models and humans, low contrasts drive stronger responses from ON pathways, whereas high contrasts drive stronger responses from OFF pathways. We demonstrate that these ON-OFF pathway differences have a correlate in human vision. At low contrast, humans locate light targets faster and more accurately than dark targets but, as contrast increases, dark targets become more visible than light targets. We also demonstrate that contrast is strongly correlated with multiple light/dark ratios of visual performance in central vision. These results provide a link between neuronal physiology and human vision while emphasizing the importance of stimulus polarity in measurements of visual fields and contrast sensitivity.
Author Tan, Jia
Rahimi-Nasrabadi, Hamed
Dellostritto, Stephen
Dul, Mitchell W.
Alonso, Jose-Manuel
Moore-Stoll, Veronica
Jin, JianZhong
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Hamed
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0599-0181
  surname: Rahimi-Nasrabadi
  fullname: Rahimi-Nasrabadi, Hamed
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Veronica
  surname: Moore-Stoll
  fullname: Moore-Stoll, Veronica
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jia
  surname: Tan
  fullname: Tan, Jia
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Stephen
  surname: Dellostritto
  fullname: Dellostritto, Stephen
– sequence: 5
  givenname: JianZhong
  surname: Jin
  fullname: Jin, JianZhong
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Mitchell W.
  surname: Dul
  fullname: Dul, Mitchell W.
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Jose-Manuel
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8066-8080
  surname: Alonso
  fullname: Alonso, Jose-Manuel
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36535768$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFUVtPFDEYbQxGFuQvkCa--DJr751JjImsrGA2LOGij02n7bolMy1OOxL-vV1gifJi0uR7OJd-5zt7YCfE4AA4xGiKOaEfvp0dX18sL2enUywkqQiZEkTIKzApaFMRhvAOmCAiUSWYZLtgL6UbhJBEWL4Bu1RwyqWoJ-DHYux90ME4OIshDzpleLn2q5zgl7hFjnT3MFuX75wLcHkGdbBwOZ_Dc53Xd_o-QR_gydjrAL_75GN4C16vdJfcwdPcB9fz46vZSbVYfj2dfV5UhjGSK7xyNRaWWiMs15zSFglhWsEahA2TLeXMNRzXJUlrbWNbXgvOGou0wAZRTPfBp0ff27HtnTVuk6FTt4Pv9XCvovbqXyT4tfoZf6umQTUlG4P3TwZD_DW6lFXvk3FdSezimBSRXGCCGywK9d0L6k0ch1DiFZYUBGFKZWEd_r3R8yrbmxfCx0eCGWJKg1sp47PO_uH8vlMYqU3F6rlitalYkfJKxUUuXsi3P_xH-AeODKpN
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3389_fncel_2022_1037641
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12886_025_03923_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2024_108485
crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1487_23_2023
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci14100966
crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_23_4_3
crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_0168_23_2023
Cites_doi 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3215-18.2019
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3235-15.2016
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004268
10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00007-9
10.1093/cercor/bhy221
10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.010
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-07-02645.2003
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0848-14.2014
10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108692
10.1038/322824a0
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1419-14.2015
10.1073/pnas.1310442111
10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111438
10.1073/pnas.0501233102
10.1167/12.1.8
10.1038/nature17936
10.1038/s42003-018-0066-y
10.1038/nn.2729
10.1038/nature09424
10.1017/S0952523800001085
10.1364/JOSAA.14.002499
10.1111/ejn.14297
10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.007
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0940-16.2016
10.1152/jn.00150.2018
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0504-11.2011
10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008007
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5461-12.2013
10.1073/pnas.89.20.9666
10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00348-9
10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.020
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0300-21.2021
10.1038/nn.2620
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1991-09.2009
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2008-18.2018
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2099-17.2017
10.1152/jn.00558.2013
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2473-10.2010
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-07-02737.2002
10.1167/17.14.5
10.1016/0042-6989(80)90091-7
10.1038/nature17941
10.1073/pnas.1706994114
10.1038/nn2029
10.1073/pnas.1005846107
10.1364/JOSA.36.000624
10.1167/iovs.15-16753
10.1073/pnas.1314690111
10.1167/tvst.9.10.6
10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.094
10.1038/nn.3878
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.004
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2456-11.2011
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2021-16.2017
10.1016/0042-6989(86)90055-6
10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.019
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2023 Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al.
Copyright Society for Neuroscience Feb 8, 2023
Copyright © 2023 Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al. 2023
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2023 Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al.
– notice: Copyright Society for Neuroscience Feb 8, 2023
– notice: Copyright © 2023 Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al. 2023
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QG
7QR
7TK
7U7
7U9
8FD
C1K
FR3
H94
P64
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1672-22.2022
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Chemoreception Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Toxicology Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Engineering Research Database
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Toxicology Abstracts
Animal Behavior Abstracts
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Chemoreception Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Neurosciences Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
CrossRef
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1529-2401
EndPage 1007
ExternalDocumentID PMC9908321
36535768
10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1672_22_2022
Genre Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 EY027361
– fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 EY005253
– fundername: ;
  grantid: EY005253
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
-~X
.55
18M
2WC
34G
39C
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
AAFWJ
AAJMC
AAYXX
ABBAR
ABIVO
ACGUR
ACNCT
ADBBV
ADHGD
AENEX
AFCFT
AFOSN
AFSQR
AHWXS
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BTFSW
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
GX1
H13
HYE
H~9
KQ8
L7B
OK1
P0W
P2P
QZG
R.V
RHI
RPM
TFN
TR2
W8F
WH7
WOQ
X7M
YBU
YHG
YKV
YNH
YSK
AFHIN
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QG
7QR
7TK
7U7
7U9
8FD
C1K
FR3
H94
P64
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-1fe816d3dc6d5a533b066cb64901c47b354e9518027bdd9db586549d0a61c0313
ISSN 0270-6474
1529-2401
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:38:33 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 04:18:18 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 16:41:07 EDT 2025
Wed Mar 05 08:08:21 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:59:15 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:00:18 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords receptive field
LGN
visual cortex
glaucoma
area V1
thalamus
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Copyright © 2023 Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c442t-1fe816d3dc6d5a533b066cb64901c47b354e9518027bdd9db586549d0a61c0313
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Author contributions: H.R.-N., J.J., M.W.D., and J.A. designed research; H.R.-N., V.M.-S., J.T., S.D., J.J., M.W.D., and J.-M.A. performed research; H.R.-N., J.J., M.W.D., and J.-M.A. contributed unpublished reagents/analytic tools; H.R.-N., J.J., M.W.D., and J.-M.A. analyzed data; H.R.-N. and J.-M.A. wrote the paper.
ORCID 0000-0003-0599-0181
0000-0002-8066-8080
OpenAccessLink https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9908321
PMID 36535768
PQID 2776201337
PQPubID 2049535
PageCount 15
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9908321
proquest_miscellaneous_2756121916
proquest_journals_2776201337
pubmed_primary_36535768
crossref_citationtrail_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1672_22_2022
crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1672_22_2022
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-02-08
20230208
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-02-08
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-02-08
  day: 08
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Baltimore
PublicationTitle The Journal of neuroscience
PublicationTitleAlternate J Neurosci
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Society for Neuroscience
Publisher_xml – name: Society for Neuroscience
References 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.48
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.49
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.46
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.47
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.44
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.45
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.42
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.43
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.40
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.41
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.9
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.8
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.7
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.39
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.6
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.5
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.37
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.4
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.38
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.3
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.35
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.2
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.36
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.1
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.33
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.34
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.31
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.32
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.30
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.28
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.29
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.26
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.27
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.24
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.25
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.22
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.23
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.20
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.21
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.60
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.19
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.17
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.18
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.15
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.59
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.16
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.13
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.57
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.14
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.58
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.11
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.55
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.12
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.56
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.53
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.10
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.54
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.51
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.52
2023041803554299000_43.6.993.50
References_xml – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.37
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3215-18.2019
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.42
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3235-15.2016
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.5
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004268
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.3
  doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00007-9
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.14
  doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy221
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.45
  doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.010
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.50
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.29
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.57
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-07-02645.2003
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.60
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0848-14.2014
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.39
  doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108692
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.46
  doi: 10.1038/322824a0
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.10
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1419-14.2015
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.22
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310442111
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.31
  doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111438
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.9
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501233102
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.27
  doi: 10.1167/12.1.8
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.23
  doi: 10.1038/nature17936
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.28
  doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0066-y
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.16
  doi: 10.1038/nn.2729
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.11
  doi: 10.1038/nature09424
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.58
  doi: 10.1017/S0952523800001085
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.12
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.38
  doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.14.002499
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.33
  doi: 10.1111/ejn.14297
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.30
  doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.007
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.35
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0940-16.2016
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.15
  doi: 10.1152/jn.00150.2018
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.19
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0504-11.2011
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.47
  doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008007
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.8
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5461-12.2013
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.7
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9666
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.13
  doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00348-9
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.20
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.020
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.26
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0300-21.2021
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.48
  doi: 10.1038/nn.2620
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.56
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1991-09.2009
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.41
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2008-18.2018
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.49
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2099-17.2017
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.44
  doi: 10.1152/jn.00558.2013
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.54
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2473-10.2010
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.2
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-07-02737.2002
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.36
  doi: 10.1167/17.14.5
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.6
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.21
  doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(80)90091-7
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.24
  doi: 10.1038/nature17941
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.43
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706994114
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.18
  doi: 10.1038/nn2029
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.40
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005846107
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.1
  doi: 10.1364/JOSA.36.000624
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.59
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-16753
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.55
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314690111
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.32
  doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.10.6
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.53
  doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.094
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.51
  doi: 10.1038/nn.3878
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.34
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.004
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.17
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2456-11.2011
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.25
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2021-16.2017
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.52
  doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90055-6
– ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.4
  doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.019
SSID ssj0007017
Score 2.4613554
Snippet Human vision processes light and dark stimuli in visual scenes with separate ON and OFF neuronal pathways. In nature, stimuli lighter or darker than their...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 993
SubjectTerms Animal models
Animals
Contrast Sensitivity
Dominance
Female
Humans
Luminance
Male
Photic Stimulation
Polarity
Vision
Vision, Ocular
Visual Cortex - physiology
Visual field
Visual Fields
Visual Pathways - physiology
Visual Perception - physiology
Visual stimuli
Visual system
Title Luminance Contrast Shifts Dominance Balance between ON and OFF Pathways in Human Vision
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36535768
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2776201337
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2756121916
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9908321
Volume 43
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1db9MwFLXKeOEFAeOjMJCREG_Zmg877uMYm0YpKbB29C1yHFeLtKbTmgqNX8-9duKmrBIDqUorO6kr32P32L73XELeKcUFEGUYSIIrL5r1lCck0x5KoUVM-LFmGOD8JeGnk2gwZdNO56rltbSqsn31a2tcyf9YFcrArhgl-w-WdV8KBfAZ7AtXsDBc72Tj4co4sihMPYebtEsUYC5m1RJ4cVPzAX0X4b1xyBol5rxgBPz0K7C_n_LGeMTazfxzE2neJqzr0DFDWlvylw4R3-VFMS-8RC7RPyC3abDlvI6aMg69i2vtnVULe8Rxro0er_s_GNs92EHhSj7iiRAmFKlMkqfGFa29QxGExql5Y1INzCmOxZDeUlbPxFawqUZce1rt2yyKt6Z7ZmQnBgl6PZ4dfdr3eRx4AcbX2WDnTX3tZJSeTIbDdHw8Hd8j9wNYWGCyj8_f1vrycc_kaHa_ro4ph3YOtreySWdurVH-dLVtcZfxI_Kwth89tAh6TDq6fEJ2D0tZLeY39D01bsDmfGWX_HCgog2oqAUVdaCiNahoDSo6SiiAigKoaAMqWpTUgIpaUD0lk5Pj8dGpV2ff8FQUBZXnz7TweR7miudMwqogA3aqMh4Bg1RRnIUs0kDPRS-Iszzv5xkTnEX9vCe5r1AR9BnZKRelfkEoZ30eCSVUFoZRzpjMhFDAg31fKn8mVZewphNTVUvTY4aUyxSXqND5qev8FDs_DeAFnd8lB-65KyvO8tcn9hobpfVAXqYABA48OAzjLnnrqmGaxbMzWerFCu_BNLI-LKa65Lk1qWsy5CzEZXuXxBvGdjeghPtmTVlcGCl34IKYKuzlHdp9RR6sB9ce2amuV_o1EOIqe2Mw_BuQ5LQ6
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Luminance+Contrast+Shifts+Dominance+Balance+between+ON+and+OFF+Pathways+in+Human+Vision&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+neuroscience&rft.au=Rahimi-Nasrabadi%2C+Hamed&rft.au=Moore-Stoll%2C+Veronica&rft.au=Tan%2C+Jia&rft.au=Dellostritto%2C+Stephen&rft.date=2023-02-08&rft.issn=1529-2401&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=993&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523%2FJNEUROSCI.1672-22.2022&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0270-6474&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0270-6474&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0270-6474&client=summon