Luminance Contrast Shifts Dominance Balance between ON and OFF Pathways in Human Vision
Human vision processes light and dark stimuli in visual scenes with separate ON and OFF neuronal pathways. In nature, stimuli lighter or darker than their local surround have different spatial properties and contrast distributions (Ratliff et al., 2010; Cooper and Norcia, 2015; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et a...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of neuroscience Vol. 43; no. 6; pp. 993 - 1007 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Society for Neuroscience
08.02.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0270-6474 1529-2401 1529-2401 |
DOI | 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1672-22.2022 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Human vision processes light and dark stimuli in visual scenes with separate ON and OFF neuronal pathways. In nature, stimuli lighter or darker than their local surround have different spatial properties and contrast distributions (Ratliff et al., 2010; Cooper and Norcia, 2015; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). Similarly, in human vision, we show that luminance contrast affects the perception of lights and darks differently. At high contrast, human subjects of both sexes locate dark stimuli faster and more accurately than light stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the OFF pathway. However, at low contrast, they locate light stimuli faster and more accurately than dark stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the ON pathway. Luminance contrast was strongly correlated with multiple ON/OFF dominance ratios estimated from light/dark ratios of performance errors, missed targets, or reaction times (RTs). All correlations could be demonstrated at multiple eccentricities of the central visual field with an ON-OFF perimetry test implemented in a head-mounted visual display. We conclude that high-contrast stimuli are processed faster and more accurately by OFF pathways than ON pathways. However, the OFF dominance shifts toward ON dominance when stimulus contrast decreases, as expected from the higher-contrast sensitivity of ON cortical pathways (Kremkow et al., 2014; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). The results highlight the importance of contrast polarity in visual field measurements and predict a loss of low-contrast vision in humans with ON pathway deficits, as demonstrated in animal models (Sarnaik et al., 2014).
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT
ON and OFF retino-thalamo-cortical pathways respond differently to luminance contrast. In both animal models and humans, low contrasts drive stronger responses from ON pathways, whereas high contrasts drive stronger responses from OFF pathways. We demonstrate that these ON-OFF pathway differences have a correlate in human vision. At low contrast, humans locate light targets faster and more accurately than dark targets but, as contrast increases, dark targets become more visible than light targets. We also demonstrate that contrast is strongly correlated with multiple light/dark ratios of visual performance in central vision. These results provide a link between neuronal physiology and human vision while emphasizing the importance of stimulus polarity in measurements of visual fields and contrast sensitivity. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Human vision processes light and dark stimuli in visual scenes with separate ON and OFF neuronal pathways. In nature, stimuli lighter or darker than their local surround have different spatial properties and contrast distributions (
Ratliff et al., 2010
;
Cooper and Norcia, 2015
;
Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021
). Similarly, in human vision, we show that luminance contrast affects the perception of lights and darks differently. At high contrast, human subjects of both sexes locate dark stimuli faster and more accurately than light stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the OFF pathway. However, at low contrast, they locate light stimuli faster and more accurately than dark stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the ON pathway. Luminance contrast was strongly correlated with multiple ON/OFF dominance ratios estimated from light/dark ratios of performance errors, missed targets, or reaction times (RTs). All correlations could be demonstrated at multiple eccentricities of the central visual field with an ON-OFF perimetry test implemented in a head-mounted visual display. We conclude that high-contrast stimuli are processed faster and more accurately by OFF pathways than ON pathways. However, the OFF dominance shifts toward ON dominance when stimulus contrast decreases, as expected from the higher-contrast sensitivity of ON cortical pathways (
Kremkow et al., 2014
;
Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021
). The results highlight the importance of contrast polarity in visual field measurements and predict a loss of low-contrast vision in humans with ON pathway deficits, as demonstrated in animal models (
Sarnaik et al., 2014
).
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT
ON and OFF retino-thalamo-cortical pathways respond differently to luminance contrast. In both animal models and humans, low contrasts drive stronger responses from ON pathways, whereas high contrasts drive stronger responses from OFF pathways. We demonstrate that these ON-OFF pathway differences have a correlate in human vision. At low contrast, humans locate light targets faster and more accurately than dark targets but, as contrast increases, dark targets become more visible than light targets. We also demonstrate that contrast is strongly correlated with multiple light/dark ratios of visual performance in central vision. These results provide a link between neuronal physiology and human vision while emphasizing the importance of stimulus polarity in measurements of visual fields and contrast sensitivity. Human vision processes light and dark stimuli in visual scenes with separate ON and OFF neuronal pathways. In nature, stimuli lighter or darker than their local surround have different spatial properties and contrast distributions (Ratliff et al., 2010; Cooper and Norcia, 2015; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). Similarly, in human vision, we show that luminance contrast affects the perception of lights and darks differently. At high contrast, human subjects of both sexes locate dark stimuli faster and more accurately than light stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the OFF pathway. However, at low contrast, they locate light stimuli faster and more accurately than dark stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the ON pathway. Luminance contrast was strongly correlated with multiple ON/OFF dominance ratios estimated from light/dark ratios of performance errors, missed targets, or reaction times (RTs). All correlations could be demonstrated at multiple eccentricities of the central visual field with an ON-OFF perimetry test implemented in a head-mounted visual display. We conclude that high-contrast stimuli are processed faster and more accurately by OFF pathways than ON pathways. However, the OFF dominance shifts toward ON dominance when stimulus contrast decreases, as expected from the higher-contrast sensitivity of ON cortical pathways (Kremkow et al., 2014; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). The results highlight the importance of contrast polarity in visual field measurements and predict a loss of low-contrast vision in humans with ON pathway deficits, as demonstrated in animal models (Sarnaik et al., 2014). Human vision processes light and dark stimuli in visual scenes with separate ON and OFF neuronal pathways. In nature, stimuli lighter or darker than their local surround have different spatial properties and contrast distributions (Ratliff et al., 2010; Cooper and Norcia, 2015; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). Similarly, in human vision, we show that luminance contrast affects the perception of lights and darks differently. At high contrast, human subjects of both sexes locate dark stimuli faster and more accurately than light stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the OFF pathway. However, at low contrast, they locate light stimuli faster and more accurately than dark stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the ON pathway. Luminance contrast was strongly correlated with multiple ON/OFF dominance ratios estimated from light/dark ratios of performance errors, missed targets, or reaction times (RTs). All correlations could be demonstrated at multiple eccentricities of the central visual field with an ON-OFF perimetry test implemented in a head-mounted visual display. We conclude that high-contrast stimuli are processed faster and more accurately by OFF pathways than ON pathways. However, the OFF dominance shifts toward ON dominance when stimulus contrast decreases, as expected from the higher-contrast sensitivity of ON cortical pathways (Kremkow et al., 2014; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). The results highlight the importance of contrast polarity in visual field measurements and predict a loss of low-contrast vision in humans with ON pathway deficits, as demonstrated in animal models (Sarnaik et al., 2014).SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT ON and OFF retino-thalamo-cortical pathways respond differently to luminance contrast. In both animal models and humans, low contrasts drive stronger responses from ON pathways, whereas high contrasts drive stronger responses from OFF pathways. We demonstrate that these ON-OFF pathway differences have a correlate in human vision. At low contrast, humans locate light targets faster and more accurately than dark targets but, as contrast increases, dark targets become more visible than light targets. We also demonstrate that contrast is strongly correlated with multiple light/dark ratios of visual performance in central vision. These results provide a link between neuronal physiology and human vision while emphasizing the importance of stimulus polarity in measurements of visual fields and contrast sensitivity.Human vision processes light and dark stimuli in visual scenes with separate ON and OFF neuronal pathways. In nature, stimuli lighter or darker than their local surround have different spatial properties and contrast distributions (Ratliff et al., 2010; Cooper and Norcia, 2015; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). Similarly, in human vision, we show that luminance contrast affects the perception of lights and darks differently. At high contrast, human subjects of both sexes locate dark stimuli faster and more accurately than light stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the OFF pathway. However, at low contrast, they locate light stimuli faster and more accurately than dark stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the ON pathway. Luminance contrast was strongly correlated with multiple ON/OFF dominance ratios estimated from light/dark ratios of performance errors, missed targets, or reaction times (RTs). All correlations could be demonstrated at multiple eccentricities of the central visual field with an ON-OFF perimetry test implemented in a head-mounted visual display. We conclude that high-contrast stimuli are processed faster and more accurately by OFF pathways than ON pathways. However, the OFF dominance shifts toward ON dominance when stimulus contrast decreases, as expected from the higher-contrast sensitivity of ON cortical pathways (Kremkow et al., 2014; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). The results highlight the importance of contrast polarity in visual field measurements and predict a loss of low-contrast vision in humans with ON pathway deficits, as demonstrated in animal models (Sarnaik et al., 2014).SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT ON and OFF retino-thalamo-cortical pathways respond differently to luminance contrast. In both animal models and humans, low contrasts drive stronger responses from ON pathways, whereas high contrasts drive stronger responses from OFF pathways. We demonstrate that these ON-OFF pathway differences have a correlate in human vision. At low contrast, humans locate light targets faster and more accurately than dark targets but, as contrast increases, dark targets become more visible than light targets. We also demonstrate that contrast is strongly correlated with multiple light/dark ratios of visual performance in central vision. These results provide a link between neuronal physiology and human vision while emphasizing the importance of stimulus polarity in measurements of visual fields and contrast sensitivity. Human vision processes light and dark stimuli in visual scenes with separate ON and OFF neuronal pathways. In nature, stimuli lighter or darker than their local surround have different spatial properties and contrast distributions (Ratliff et al., 2010; Cooper and Norcia, 2015; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). Similarly, in human vision, we show that luminance contrast affects the perception of lights and darks differently. At high contrast, human subjects of both sexes locate dark stimuli faster and more accurately than light stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the OFF pathway. However, at low contrast, they locate light stimuli faster and more accurately than dark stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the ON pathway. Luminance contrast was strongly correlated with multiple ON/OFF dominance ratios estimated from light/dark ratios of performance errors, missed targets, or reaction times (RTs). All correlations could be demonstrated at multiple eccentricities of the central visual field with an ON-OFF perimetry test implemented in a head-mounted visual display. We conclude that high-contrast stimuli are processed faster and more accurately by OFF pathways than ON pathways. However, the OFF dominance shifts toward ON dominance when stimulus contrast decreases, as expected from the higher-contrast sensitivity of ON cortical pathways (Kremkow et al., 2014; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). The results highlight the importance of contrast polarity in visual field measurements and predict a loss of low-contrast vision in humans with ON pathway deficits, as demonstrated in animal models (Sarnaik et al., 2014). SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT ON and OFF retino-thalamo-cortical pathways respond differently to luminance contrast. In both animal models and humans, low contrasts drive stronger responses from ON pathways, whereas high contrasts drive stronger responses from OFF pathways. We demonstrate that these ON-OFF pathway differences have a correlate in human vision. At low contrast, humans locate light targets faster and more accurately than dark targets but, as contrast increases, dark targets become more visible than light targets. We also demonstrate that contrast is strongly correlated with multiple light/dark ratios of visual performance in central vision. These results provide a link between neuronal physiology and human vision while emphasizing the importance of stimulus polarity in measurements of visual fields and contrast sensitivity. Human vision processes light and dark stimuli in visual scenes with separate ON and OFF neuronal pathways. In nature, stimuli lighter or darker than their local surround have different spatial properties and contrast distributions (Ratliff et al., 2010; Cooper and Norcia, 2015; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). Similarly, in human vision, we show that luminance contrast affects the perception of lights and darks differently. At high contrast, human subjects of both sexes locate dark stimuli faster and more accurately than light stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the OFF pathway. However, at low contrast, they locate light stimuli faster and more accurately than dark stimuli, which is consistent with a visual system dominated by the ON pathway. Luminance contrast was strongly correlated with multiple ON/OFF dominance ratios estimated from light/dark ratios of performance errors, missed targets, or reaction times (RTs). All correlations could be demonstrated at multiple eccentricities of the central visual field with an ON-OFF perimetry test implemented in a head-mounted visual display. We conclude that high-contrast stimuli are processed faster and more accurately by OFF pathways than ON pathways. However, the OFF dominance shifts toward ON dominance when stimulus contrast decreases, as expected from the higher-contrast sensitivity of ON cortical pathways (Kremkow et al., 2014; Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al., 2021). The results highlight the importance of contrast polarity in visual field measurements and predict a loss of low-contrast vision in humans with ON pathway deficits, as demonstrated in animal models (Sarnaik et al., 2014). ON and OFF retino-thalamo-cortical pathways respond differently to luminance contrast. In both animal models and humans, low contrasts drive stronger responses from ON pathways, whereas high contrasts drive stronger responses from OFF pathways. We demonstrate that these ON-OFF pathway differences have a correlate in human vision. At low contrast, humans locate light targets faster and more accurately than dark targets but, as contrast increases, dark targets become more visible than light targets. We also demonstrate that contrast is strongly correlated with multiple light/dark ratios of visual performance in central vision. These results provide a link between neuronal physiology and human vision while emphasizing the importance of stimulus polarity in measurements of visual fields and contrast sensitivity. |
Author | Tan, Jia Rahimi-Nasrabadi, Hamed Dellostritto, Stephen Dul, Mitchell W. Alonso, Jose-Manuel Moore-Stoll, Veronica Jin, JianZhong |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Hamed orcidid: 0000-0003-0599-0181 surname: Rahimi-Nasrabadi fullname: Rahimi-Nasrabadi, Hamed – sequence: 2 givenname: Veronica surname: Moore-Stoll fullname: Moore-Stoll, Veronica – sequence: 3 givenname: Jia surname: Tan fullname: Tan, Jia – sequence: 4 givenname: Stephen surname: Dellostritto fullname: Dellostritto, Stephen – sequence: 5 givenname: JianZhong surname: Jin fullname: Jin, JianZhong – sequence: 6 givenname: Mitchell W. surname: Dul fullname: Dul, Mitchell W. – sequence: 7 givenname: Jose-Manuel orcidid: 0000-0002-8066-8080 surname: Alonso fullname: Alonso, Jose-Manuel |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36535768$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFUVtPFDEYbQxGFuQvkCa--DJr751JjImsrGA2LOGij02n7bolMy1OOxL-vV1gifJi0uR7OJd-5zt7YCfE4AA4xGiKOaEfvp0dX18sL2enUywkqQiZEkTIKzApaFMRhvAOmCAiUSWYZLtgL6UbhJBEWL4Bu1RwyqWoJ-DHYux90ME4OIshDzpleLn2q5zgl7hFjnT3MFuX75wLcHkGdbBwOZ_Dc53Xd_o-QR_gydjrAL_75GN4C16vdJfcwdPcB9fz46vZSbVYfj2dfV5UhjGSK7xyNRaWWiMs15zSFglhWsEahA2TLeXMNRzXJUlrbWNbXgvOGou0wAZRTPfBp0ff27HtnTVuk6FTt4Pv9XCvovbqXyT4tfoZf6umQTUlG4P3TwZD_DW6lFXvk3FdSezimBSRXGCCGywK9d0L6k0ch1DiFZYUBGFKZWEd_r3R8yrbmxfCx0eCGWJKg1sp47PO_uH8vlMYqU3F6rlitalYkfJKxUUuXsi3P_xH-AeODKpN |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3389_fncel_2022_1037641 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12886_025_03923_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2024_108485 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1487_23_2023 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci14100966 crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_23_4_3 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_0168_23_2023 |
Cites_doi | 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3215-18.2019 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3235-15.2016 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004268 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00007-9 10.1093/cercor/bhy221 10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.010 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-07-02645.2003 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0848-14.2014 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108692 10.1038/322824a0 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1419-14.2015 10.1073/pnas.1310442111 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111438 10.1073/pnas.0501233102 10.1167/12.1.8 10.1038/nature17936 10.1038/s42003-018-0066-y 10.1038/nn.2729 10.1038/nature09424 10.1017/S0952523800001085 10.1364/JOSAA.14.002499 10.1111/ejn.14297 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.007 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0940-16.2016 10.1152/jn.00150.2018 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0504-11.2011 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008007 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5461-12.2013 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9666 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00348-9 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.020 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0300-21.2021 10.1038/nn.2620 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1991-09.2009 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2008-18.2018 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2099-17.2017 10.1152/jn.00558.2013 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2473-10.2010 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-07-02737.2002 10.1167/17.14.5 10.1016/0042-6989(80)90091-7 10.1038/nature17941 10.1073/pnas.1706994114 10.1038/nn2029 10.1073/pnas.1005846107 10.1364/JOSA.36.000624 10.1167/iovs.15-16753 10.1073/pnas.1314690111 10.1167/tvst.9.10.6 10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.094 10.1038/nn.3878 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.004 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2456-11.2011 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2021-16.2017 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90055-6 10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.019 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2023 Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al. Copyright Society for Neuroscience Feb 8, 2023 Copyright © 2023 Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al. 2023 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2023 Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al. – notice: Copyright Society for Neuroscience Feb 8, 2023 – notice: Copyright © 2023 Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al. 2023 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7QR 7TK 7U7 7U9 8FD C1K FR3 H94 P64 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1672-22.2022 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Animal Behavior Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Toxicology Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Virology and AIDS Abstracts Technology Research Database Toxicology Abstracts Animal Behavior Abstracts AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Engineering Research Database Neurosciences Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Virology and AIDS Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1529-2401 |
EndPage | 1007 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC9908321 36535768 10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1672_22_2022 |
Genre | Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: R01 EY027361 – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: R01 EY005253 – fundername: ; grantid: EY005253 |
GroupedDBID | --- -DZ -~X .55 18M 2WC 34G 39C 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS AAFWJ AAJMC AAYXX ABBAR ABIVO ACGUR ACNCT ADBBV ADHGD AENEX AFCFT AFOSN AFSQR AHWXS ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BTFSW CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD F5P GX1 H13 HYE H~9 KQ8 L7B OK1 P0W P2P QZG R.V RHI RPM TFN TR2 W8F WH7 WOQ X7M YBU YHG YKV YNH YSK AFHIN CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7QR 7TK 7U7 7U9 8FD C1K FR3 H94 P64 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-1fe816d3dc6d5a533b066cb64901c47b354e9518027bdd9db586549d0a61c0313 |
ISSN | 0270-6474 1529-2401 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:38:33 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 04:18:18 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 16:41:07 EDT 2025 Wed Mar 05 08:08:21 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:59:15 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:00:18 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Keywords | receptive field LGN visual cortex glaucoma area V1 thalamus |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Copyright © 2023 Rahimi-Nasrabadi et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c442t-1fe816d3dc6d5a533b066cb64901c47b354e9518027bdd9db586549d0a61c0313 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Author contributions: H.R.-N., J.J., M.W.D., and J.A. designed research; H.R.-N., V.M.-S., J.T., S.D., J.J., M.W.D., and J.-M.A. performed research; H.R.-N., J.J., M.W.D., and J.-M.A. contributed unpublished reagents/analytic tools; H.R.-N., J.J., M.W.D., and J.-M.A. analyzed data; H.R.-N. and J.-M.A. wrote the paper. |
ORCID | 0000-0003-0599-0181 0000-0002-8066-8080 |
OpenAccessLink | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9908321 |
PMID | 36535768 |
PQID | 2776201337 |
PQPubID | 2049535 |
PageCount | 15 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9908321 proquest_miscellaneous_2756121916 proquest_journals_2776201337 pubmed_primary_36535768 crossref_citationtrail_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1672_22_2022 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1672_22_2022 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-02-08 20230208 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-02-08 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2023 text: 2023-02-08 day: 08 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Baltimore |
PublicationTitle | The Journal of neuroscience |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Neurosci |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | Society for Neuroscience |
Publisher_xml | – name: Society for Neuroscience |
References | 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.48 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.49 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.46 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.47 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.44 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.45 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.42 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.43 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.40 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.41 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.9 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.8 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.7 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.39 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.6 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.5 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.37 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.4 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.38 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.3 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.35 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.2 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.36 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.1 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.33 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.34 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.31 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.32 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.30 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.28 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.29 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.26 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.27 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.24 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.25 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.22 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.23 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.20 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.21 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.60 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.19 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.17 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.18 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.15 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.59 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.16 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.13 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.57 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.14 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.58 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.11 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.55 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.12 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.56 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.53 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.10 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.54 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.51 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.52 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.50 |
References_xml | – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.37 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3215-18.2019 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.42 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3235-15.2016 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.5 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004268 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.3 doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00007-9 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.14 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy221 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.45 doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.010 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.50 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.29 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.57 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-07-02645.2003 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.60 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0848-14.2014 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.39 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108692 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.46 doi: 10.1038/322824a0 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.10 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1419-14.2015 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.22 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310442111 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.31 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111438 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.9 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501233102 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.27 doi: 10.1167/12.1.8 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.23 doi: 10.1038/nature17936 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.28 doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0066-y – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.16 doi: 10.1038/nn.2729 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.11 doi: 10.1038/nature09424 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.58 doi: 10.1017/S0952523800001085 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.12 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.38 doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.14.002499 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.33 doi: 10.1111/ejn.14297 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.30 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.007 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.35 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0940-16.2016 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.15 doi: 10.1152/jn.00150.2018 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.19 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0504-11.2011 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.47 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008007 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.8 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5461-12.2013 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.7 doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9666 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.13 doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00348-9 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.20 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.020 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.26 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0300-21.2021 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.48 doi: 10.1038/nn.2620 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.56 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1991-09.2009 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.41 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2008-18.2018 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.49 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2099-17.2017 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.44 doi: 10.1152/jn.00558.2013 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.54 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2473-10.2010 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.2 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-07-02737.2002 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.36 doi: 10.1167/17.14.5 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.6 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.21 doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(80)90091-7 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.24 doi: 10.1038/nature17941 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.43 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706994114 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.18 doi: 10.1038/nn2029 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.40 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005846107 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.1 doi: 10.1364/JOSA.36.000624 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.59 doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-16753 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.55 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314690111 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.32 doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.10.6 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.53 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.094 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.51 doi: 10.1038/nn.3878 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.34 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.004 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.17 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2456-11.2011 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.25 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2021-16.2017 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.52 doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90055-6 – ident: 2023041803554299000_43.6.993.4 doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.019 |
SSID | ssj0007017 |
Score | 2.4613554 |
Snippet | Human vision processes light and dark stimuli in visual scenes with separate ON and OFF neuronal pathways. In nature, stimuli lighter or darker than their... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 993 |
SubjectTerms | Animal models Animals Contrast Sensitivity Dominance Female Humans Luminance Male Photic Stimulation Polarity Vision Vision, Ocular Visual Cortex - physiology Visual field Visual Fields Visual Pathways - physiology Visual Perception - physiology Visual stimuli Visual system |
Title | Luminance Contrast Shifts Dominance Balance between ON and OFF Pathways in Human Vision |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36535768 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2776201337 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2756121916 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9908321 |
Volume | 43 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1db9MwFLXKeOEFAeOjMJCREG_Zmg877uMYm0YpKbB29C1yHFeLtKbTmgqNX8-9duKmrBIDqUorO6kr32P32L73XELeKcUFEGUYSIIrL5r1lCck0x5KoUVM-LFmGOD8JeGnk2gwZdNO56rltbSqsn31a2tcyf9YFcrArhgl-w-WdV8KBfAZ7AtXsDBc72Tj4co4sihMPYebtEsUYC5m1RJ4cVPzAX0X4b1xyBol5rxgBPz0K7C_n_LGeMTazfxzE2neJqzr0DFDWlvylw4R3-VFMS-8RC7RPyC3abDlvI6aMg69i2vtnVULe8Rxro0er_s_GNs92EHhSj7iiRAmFKlMkqfGFa29QxGExql5Y1INzCmOxZDeUlbPxFawqUZce1rt2yyKt6Z7ZmQnBgl6PZ4dfdr3eRx4AcbX2WDnTX3tZJSeTIbDdHw8Hd8j9wNYWGCyj8_f1vrycc_kaHa_ro4ph3YOtreySWdurVH-dLVtcZfxI_Kwth89tAh6TDq6fEJ2D0tZLeY39D01bsDmfGWX_HCgog2oqAUVdaCiNahoDSo6SiiAigKoaAMqWpTUgIpaUD0lk5Pj8dGpV2ff8FQUBZXnz7TweR7miudMwqogA3aqMh4Bg1RRnIUs0kDPRS-Iszzv5xkTnEX9vCe5r1AR9BnZKRelfkEoZ30eCSVUFoZRzpjMhFDAg31fKn8mVZewphNTVUvTY4aUyxSXqND5qev8FDs_DeAFnd8lB-65KyvO8tcn9hobpfVAXqYABA48OAzjLnnrqmGaxbMzWerFCu_BNLI-LKa65Lk1qWsy5CzEZXuXxBvGdjeghPtmTVlcGCl34IKYKuzlHdp9RR6sB9ce2amuV_o1EOIqe2Mw_BuQ5LQ6 |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Luminance+Contrast+Shifts+Dominance+Balance+between+ON+and+OFF+Pathways+in+Human+Vision&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+neuroscience&rft.au=Rahimi-Nasrabadi%2C+Hamed&rft.au=Moore-Stoll%2C+Veronica&rft.au=Tan%2C+Jia&rft.au=Dellostritto%2C+Stephen&rft.date=2023-02-08&rft.issn=1529-2401&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=993&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523%2FJNEUROSCI.1672-22.2022&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0270-6474&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0270-6474&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0270-6474&client=summon |