Student Perceptions of Substance Use Disorder Stigma as a Factor for Health Disparities: A Mixed-Methods Study

• Published in: Pharmacy Vol. 11; no. 4; p. 112
• Main Authors: Barenie, Rachel E, Cernasev, Alina, Hohmeier, Kenneth C, Heidel, R Eric, Knight, Phillip, Forrest-Bank, Shandra
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01.07.2023; MDPI
• Subjects: College students; Data collection; Dentistry; Drug use; Focus groups; Health care disparities; Health disparities; health profession education; Health sciences; Medical personnel; Methadone; Mixed methods research; Narcotics; Patients; Pharmacy; Professionals; Professions; Psychological aspects; Social aspects; Stigma; Stigma (Social psychology); Students; Substance abuse; Substance abuse treatment; Substance use disorder; Surveys; United States; United States > US; health profession education; substance use disorder; stigma
• ISSN: 2226-4787; 2226-4787
• DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy11040112

The prevalence of substance use disorders (SUDs) is an alarming problem in the United States; however, only a fraction of patients receive treatment. Stigma from both healthcare professionals and society at large negatively impacts SUD treatment. There are limited data regarding the perceptions of healthcare students on SUD stigma as a health disparity. We conducted a concurrent mixed-methods study among students enrolled in six health-related colleges at one mid-south health science center in the US over 3 months. Both an electronic survey consisting of 17 close-ended questions and researcher-led focus groups were conducted to understand their perceptions of stigma and SUDs. The research team followed the six steps recommended by Braun and Clarke regarding the data that aimed to capture associations between categories and extract and conceptualize the themes, and thematic analysis was done using Dedoose (Manhattan Beach, CA, USA) qualitative software, which facilitated all the codes being kept organized and compared the frequency of codes across categories. A total of = 428 students participated in the survey (response rate = 13%), and = 31 students took part in five focus groups. Most student respondents, on average, either agreed or strongly agreed that: stigma currently exists in the healthcare field; stigma can lead to patients' not receiving the appropriate care for an SUD; and stigma can lead to lower quality care provided to patients with SUDs. Two themes were identified based on the thematic analysis: (1) additional training is necessary to better equip students for addressing SUDs in practice and (2) suggestions were formed to develop synergy between didactic and clinical rotations to improve SUD training. It is evident that students perceive the stigma surrounding SUDs as a detriment to patient care. Opportunities may exist in professional training programs to more seamlessly and intentionally weave SUD treatment and management concepts throughout the curriculum, as well as to empower students to operate in the complex regulatory scheme that exists for SUDs in the US.