Diabetes mellitus may affect the long-term survival of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma patients after liver transplantation

AIM to determine whether diabetes mellitus(DM) affects prognosis/recurrence after liver transplantation(Lt) for hepatitis B virus(HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). METHODS A retrospective study was conducted between January 2000 and August 2013 on 1631 patients with HBV-related HCC who und...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 22; no. 43; pp. 9571 - 9585
Main Authors Zhang, Qing, Deng, Yong-Lin, Liu, Chang, Huang, Li-Hong, Shang, Lei, Chen, Xin-Guo, Wang, Le-Tian, Du, Jin-Zan, Wang, Ying, Wang, Pei-Xiao, Zhang, Hui, Shen, Zhong-Yang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 21.11.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract AIM to determine whether diabetes mellitus(DM) affects prognosis/recurrence after liver transplantation(Lt) for hepatitis B virus(HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). METHODS A retrospective study was conducted between January 2000 and August 2013 on 1631 patients with HBV-related HCC who underwent Lt with antiviral prophylaxis. Patient data were obtained from the China Liver transplant Registry(https://www.cltr.org/). to compare the outcomes and tumor recurrence in the HBV-related HCC patients with or without DM, statistical analyses were conducted using χ2 tests, Mann-Whitney tests, the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests and multivariate step-wise Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Univariate analysis of 1631 patients who underwent Lt found overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 79%, 73% and 71% respectively in the DM patients, and 84%, 78% and 76% in the non-DM patients respectively. Overall survival rate differences after Lt between the two groups were significant(P = 0.041), but recurrence-free survival rates were not(P = 0.096). By stratified analysis, the overall survival rates in DM patients for age > 50 years(P = 0.002), the presence of vascular invasion(P = 0.096), tumors ≤ 3 cm(P = 0.047), two to three tumor nodules(P = 0.007), Child-Pugh grade B(P = 0.018), and preLt alanine aminotransferase levels between 40 and 80 IU/L(P = 0.017) were significantly lower than in non-DM patients. Additionally, serum α-fetoprotein level > 2000 ng/m L(P = 0.052) was associated with a significant survival difference trend between DM and non-DM patients. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of DM(P < 0.001, HR = 1.591; 95%CI: 1.239-2.041) was an independent predictor associated with poor survival after Lt. CONCLUSION HBV-related HCC patients with DM have decreased long-term overall survival and poor Lt outcomes. Prevention strategies for HCC patients with DM are recommended.
AbstractList To determine whether diabetes mellitus (DM) affects prognosis/recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).AIMTo determine whether diabetes mellitus (DM) affects prognosis/recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).A retrospective study was conducted between January 2000 and August 2013 on 1631 patients with HBV-related HCC who underwent LT with antiviral prophylaxis. Patient data were obtained from the China Liver Transplant Registry (https://www.cltr.org/). To compare the outcomes and tumor recurrence in the HBV-related HCC patients with or without DM, statistical analyses were conducted using χ2 tests, Mann-Whitney tests, the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests and multivariate step-wise Cox regression analysis.METHODSA retrospective study was conducted between January 2000 and August 2013 on 1631 patients with HBV-related HCC who underwent LT with antiviral prophylaxis. Patient data were obtained from the China Liver Transplant Registry (https://www.cltr.org/). To compare the outcomes and tumor recurrence in the HBV-related HCC patients with or without DM, statistical analyses were conducted using χ2 tests, Mann-Whitney tests, the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests and multivariate step-wise Cox regression analysis.Univariate analysis of 1631 patients who underwent LT found overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 79%, 73% and 71% respectively in the DM patients, and 84%, 78% and 76% in the non-DM patients respectively. Overall survival rate differences after LT between the two groups were significant (P = 0.041), but recurrence-free survival rates were not (P = 0.096). By stratified analysis, the overall survival rates in DM patients for age > 50 years (P = 0.002), the presence of vascular invasion (P = 0.096), tumors ≤ 3 cm (P = 0.047), two to three tumor nodules (P = 0.007), Child-Pugh grade B (P = 0.018), and pre-LT alanine aminotransferase levels between 40 and 80 IU/L (P = 0.017) were significantly lower than in non-DM patients. Additionally, serum α-fetoprotein level > 2000 ng/mL (P = 0.052) was associated with a significant survival difference trend between DM and non-DM patients. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of DM (P < 0.001, HR = 1.591; 95%CI: 1.239-2.041) was an independent predictor associated with poor survival after LT.RESULTSUnivariate analysis of 1631 patients who underwent LT found overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 79%, 73% and 71% respectively in the DM patients, and 84%, 78% and 76% in the non-DM patients respectively. Overall survival rate differences after LT between the two groups were significant (P = 0.041), but recurrence-free survival rates were not (P = 0.096). By stratified analysis, the overall survival rates in DM patients for age > 50 years (P = 0.002), the presence of vascular invasion (P = 0.096), tumors ≤ 3 cm (P = 0.047), two to three tumor nodules (P = 0.007), Child-Pugh grade B (P = 0.018), and pre-LT alanine aminotransferase levels between 40 and 80 IU/L (P = 0.017) were significantly lower than in non-DM patients. Additionally, serum α-fetoprotein level > 2000 ng/mL (P = 0.052) was associated with a significant survival difference trend between DM and non-DM patients. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of DM (P < 0.001, HR = 1.591; 95%CI: 1.239-2.041) was an independent predictor associated with poor survival after LT.HBV-related HCC patients with DM have decreased long-term overall survival and poor LT outcomes. Prevention strategies for HCC patients with DM are recommended.CONCLUSIONHBV-related HCC patients with DM have decreased long-term overall survival and poor LT outcomes. Prevention strategies for HCC patients with DM are recommended.
To determine whether diabetes mellitus (DM) affects prognosis/recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A retrospective study was conducted between January 2000 and August 2013 on 1631 patients with HBV-related HCC who underwent LT with antiviral prophylaxis. Patient data were obtained from the China Liver Transplant Registry (https://www.cltr.org/). To compare the outcomes and tumor recurrence in the HBV-related HCC patients with or without DM, statistical analyses were conducted using χ tests, Mann-Whitney tests, the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests and multivariate step-wise Cox regression analysis. Univariate analysis of 1631 patients who underwent LT found overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 79%, 73% and 71% respectively in the DM patients, and 84%, 78% and 76% in the non-DM patients respectively. Overall survival rate differences after LT between the two groups were significant ( = 0.041), but recurrence-free survival rates were not ( = 0.096). By stratified analysis, the overall survival rates in DM patients for age > 50 years ( = 0.002), the presence of vascular invasion ( = 0.096), tumors ≤ 3 cm ( = 0.047), two to three tumor nodules ( = 0.007), Child-Pugh grade B ( = 0.018), and pre-LT alanine aminotransferase levels between 40 and 80 IU/L ( = 0.017) were significantly lower than in non-DM patients. Additionally, serum α-fetoprotein level > 2000 ng/mL ( = 0.052) was associated with a significant survival difference trend between DM and non-DM patients. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of DM ( < 0.001, HR = 1.591; 95%CI: 1.239-2.041) was an independent predictor associated with poor survival after LT. HBV-related HCC patients with DM have decreased long-term overall survival and poor LT outcomes. Prevention strategies for HCC patients with DM are recommended.
AIM to determine whether diabetes mellitus(DM) affects prognosis/recurrence after liver transplantation(Lt) for hepatitis B virus(HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). METHODS A retrospective study was conducted between January 2000 and August 2013 on 1631 patients with HBV-related HCC who underwent Lt with antiviral prophylaxis. Patient data were obtained from the China Liver transplant Registry(https://www.cltr.org/). to compare the outcomes and tumor recurrence in the HBV-related HCC patients with or without DM, statistical analyses were conducted using χ2 tests, Mann-Whitney tests, the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests and multivariate step-wise Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Univariate analysis of 1631 patients who underwent Lt found overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 79%, 73% and 71% respectively in the DM patients, and 84%, 78% and 76% in the non-DM patients respectively. Overall survival rate differences after Lt between the two groups were significant(P = 0.041), but recurrence-free survival rates were not(P = 0.096). By stratified analysis, the overall survival rates in DM patients for age &gt; 50 years(P = 0.002), the presence of vascular invasion(P = 0.096), tumors ≤ 3 cm(P = 0.047), two to three tumor nodules(P = 0.007), Child-Pugh grade B(P = 0.018), and preLt alanine aminotransferase levels between 40 and 80 IU/L(P = 0.017) were significantly lower than in non-DM patients. Additionally, serum α-fetoprotein level &gt; 2000 ng/m L(P = 0.052) was associated with a significant survival difference trend between DM and non-DM patients. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of DM(P &lt; 0.001, HR = 1.591; 95%CI: 1.239-2.041) was an independent predictor associated with poor survival after Lt. CONCLUSION HBV-related HCC patients with DM have decreased long-term overall survival and poor Lt outcomes. Prevention strategies for HCC patients with DM are recommended.
Author Qing Zhang Yong-Lin Deng Chang Liu Li-Hong Huang Lei Shang Xin-Guo Chen Le-Tian Wang Jin-Zan Du Ying Wang Pei-Xiao Wang Hui Zhang Zhong-Yang Shen
AuthorAffiliation Institute of Liver Transplantation, General Hospital of Chinese People’s Armed Police Forces;Department of Transplant Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital;Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Xi’an Jiaotong University;Department of Health Statistics, Faculty of Preventive Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University;Department of Gastroenterology, Luoyang Dongfang Hospital
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Qing
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Qing
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Yong-Lin
  surname: Deng
  fullname: Deng, Yong-Lin
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Chang
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Chang
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Li-Hong
  surname: Huang
  fullname: Huang, Li-Hong
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Lei
  surname: Shang
  fullname: Shang, Lei
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Xin-Guo
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Xin-Guo
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Le-Tian
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Le-Tian
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Jin-Zan
  surname: Du
  fullname: Du, Jin-Zan
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Ying
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Ying
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Pei-Xiao
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Pei-Xiao
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Hui
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Hui
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Zhong-Yang
  surname: Shen
  fullname: Shen, Zhong-Yang
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27920478$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kUtv1DAUhSNURKeFPSvkJZsMfibOBgnKU6rEBtaW49zMuHLsqe2k6p_gN-Mw0wpY4IV9pXvOd22fi-rMBw9V9ZLgLWu5fHN3s9sulG4tZ9tOtORJtaGUdDWVHJ9VG4JxW3eMtufVRUo3GFPGBH1WndO2o5i3clP9_GB1DxkSmsA5m-dS6HukxxFMRnkPyAW_qzPECaU5LnbRDoUR7eGgs802ofdosXFOdQSnMwzHTjCFNjsdkdHRWB8mjVYD-JwKvOCQs0vZc9Q-HZz2uXSDf149HbVL8OJ0XlY_Pn38fvWlvv72-evVu-vacI5zTekoMBuJBAMS87FrGAdiemFAjIMciGgM6QdOiOxbIVkvxEChG4qWNL3p2WX19sg9zP0Egyn3itqpQ7STjvcqaKv-7ni7V7uwKEFI02BSAK9PgBhuZ0hZTTatj9YewpwUkbxhLaZSFOmrP2c9DnkIoQiao8DEkFKEURl7_I4y2jpFsFrTViVtVdJWJW21pl2M-B_jA_s_Fnay7Euut9bvHj0dluvqBOaSd4ILKsjvirBfj_rC5g
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1097_TXD_0000000000001060
crossref_primary_10_1097_CEJ_0000000000000669
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_transproceed_2022_03_070
crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0000000000004840
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina59050923
crossref_primary_10_1111_liv_13877
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers11111626
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2021_08_010
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_020_06053_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_liver_2024_100208
crossref_primary_10_1111_liv_13982
crossref_primary_10_1080_17474124_2023_2196403
crossref_primary_10_5500_wjt_v12_i8_259
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_transproceed_2018_01_045
Cites_doi 10.1093/aje/kwh161
10.1097/00000658-199803000-00015
10.1016/016
10.1001/jama.2013.168118
10.1186/1471-230x-13-9
10.1111/j.1872-034X.2012.00979.x
10.1371/journal.pone.0050919
10.1002/jso.22137
10.1371/journal.pone.0093128
10.1093/jnci/88.20.1472
10.1056/nejm199603143341104
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07688.x
10.1002/bjs.5198
10.1093/jnci/83.24.1820
10.1002/hep.22898
10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60723-5
10.1002/ijc.27337
10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-1131
10.2337/dc12-s011
10.1097/00004836-200411003-00008
10.1038/bjc.2013.25
10.1111/j.1600-0676.1990.tb00455.x
10.1111/j.1751-2980.2009.00376.x
10.1097/00042737-200311000-00009
10.1002/cncr.24982
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01354.x
10.1097/TP.0b013e31825c58ea
10.1620/tjem.227.73
10.1053/jhep.1996.v24.pm0008690397
10.1016/j.clinre.2010.11.002
10.1016/0016-5085(84)90544-4
10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9217
10.1097/MEG.0b013e3282f55e1e
10.1016/S1499-3872(11)60059-3
10.1371/journal.pone.0084776
10.1053/jhep.2001.24563
10.1002/ijc.25362
10.1002/1097-0142(20010301)91:5<957::AID-CNCR1085>3.0.CO;2-J
10.1002/hep.510270615
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2016
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2016
DBID 2RA
92L
CQIGP
~WA
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.3748/wjg.v22.i43.9571
DatabaseName 维普期刊资源整合服务平台
中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点
中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台
中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
DocumentTitleAlternate Diabetes mellitus may affect the long-term survival of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma patients after liver transplantation
EISSN 2219-2840
EndPage 9585
ExternalDocumentID PMC5116601
27920478
10_3748_wjg_v22_i43_9571
90888889504849545251484951
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
123
29R
2B.
2C~
2RA
2WC
36B
53G
5VR
8WL
92F
92I
92L
93N
93R
AAKDD
ACGFO
AENEX
AFUIB
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CCEZO
CHBEP
CIEJG
CQIGP
CS3
CW9
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EMB
F5P
FA0
FRP
GX1
HYE
M~E
OK1
P2P
RNS
RPM
SV3
TCJ
TGQ
TR2
WFFXF
XSB
~WA
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-22f503f18ece804f9634e1cb5ce5fd8d156c1bd4118b7583b55d2e9d80416bcb3
ISSN 1007-9327
2219-2840
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 14:22:54 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 18:08:50 EDT 2025
Thu May 23 23:23:46 EDT 2024
Thu Apr 24 23:12:43 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:11:29 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 14 10:07:34 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 43
Keywords Hepatocellular carcinoma
Hepatitis B virus
Survival
Diabetes mellitus
Liver transplantation
Language English
License This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c440t-22f503f18ece804f9634e1cb5ce5fd8d156c1bd4118b7583b55d2e9d80416bcb3
Notes Qing Zhang;Yong-Lin Deng;Chang Liu;Li-Hong Huang;Lei Shang;Xin-Guo Chen;Le-Tian Wang;Jin-Zan Du;Ying Wang;Pei-Xiao Wang;Hui Zhang;Zhong-Yang Shen;Institute of Liver Transplantation, General Hospital of Chinese People’s Armed Police Forces;Department of Transplant Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital;Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Xi’an Jiaotong University;Department of Health Statistics, Faculty of Preventive Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University;Department of Gastroenterology, Luoyang Dongfang Hospital
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Correspondence to: Dr. Zhong-Yang Shen, Institute of Liver Transplantation, General Hospital of Chinese People’s Armed Police Forces, 69 Yongding Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100039, China. zqy47@sina.com
Telephone: +86-10-57976839 Fax: +86-10-68242910
Author contributions: Zhang Q, Deng YL, Liu C, Huang LH and Shang L contributed equally to this study; Zhang Q and Shen ZY proposed and designed the study; Zhang Q, Deng YL, Liu C and Huang LH performed the research and wrote the first draft of the manuscript; Huang LH, Shang L, Chen XG and Wang LT collected the patient and statistical data; Shang L analyzed and reviewed the data; All authors contributed to the design, revisions and interpretation of the study and to further drafts of the manuscript; Shang L and Shen ZY are the guarantors; all authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, General Program, No. 81372595; and the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program), No. 2012AA021006.
OpenAccessLink https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5116601
PMID 27920478
PQID 1846370285
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 15
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5116601
proquest_miscellaneous_1846370285
pubmed_primary_27920478
crossref_citationtrail_10_3748_wjg_v22_i43_9571
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v22_i43_9571
chongqing_primary_90888889504849545251484951
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-11-21
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-11-21
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-11-21
  day: 21
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle World journal of gastroenterology : WJG
PublicationTitleAlternate World Journal of Gastroenterology
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
References ref13
ref35
ref12
ref34
ref15
ref37
ref14
ref36
ref31
ref30
ref11
ref33
ref10
ref32
ref2
ref1
ref17
ref39
ref16
ref38
ref19
ref18
ref24
ref23
ref26
ref25
ref20
ref42
ref41
ref22
ref21
ref28
ref27
ref29
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
ref40
15191933 - Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Jun 15;159(12):1160-7
22065536 - J Surg Oncol. 2012 May;105(6):606-11
21501980 - Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2011 Mar;35(3):214-20
9620328 - Hepatology. 1998 Jun;27(6):1567-71
14572582 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Oct;98(10):2293-8
11251947 - Cancer. 2001 Mar 1;91(5):957-63
22688467 - Tohoku J Exp Med. 2012;227(1):73-81
15602165 - J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004 Nov-Dec;38(10 Suppl 3):S158-68
22187469 - Diabetes Care. 2012 Jan;35 Suppl 1:S11-63
24676010 - PLoS One. 2014 Mar 27;9(3):e93128
9527066 - Ann Surg. 1998 Mar;227(3):424-32
14560154 - Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Nov;15(11):1203-8
24002281 - JAMA. 2013 Sep 4;310(9):948-59
18679070 - Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Jul;20(7):668-73
8841022 - J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 Oct 16;88(20):1472-7
22052244 - Int J Cancer. 2012 Sep 1;131(5):1197-202
1696678 - Liver. 1990 Jun;10(3):177-84
2153513 - Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1990 Jan;8(1):29-36
19426397 - J Dig Dis. 2009 May;10(2):138-44
19549812 - Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jul;18(7):2054-60
1660542 - J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991 Dec 18;83(24):1820-6
11391528 - Hepatology. 2001 Jun;33(6):1394-403
19399792 - Hepatology. 2009 May;49(5 Suppl):S45-55
21813381 - Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2011 Aug;10(4):346-55
25071314 - World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 28;20(28):9217-28
16329080 - Br J Surg. 2006 Jan;93(1):11-8
7683438 - Rev Clin Esp. 1993 Mar;192(5):214-6
20166205 - Cancer. 2010 Apr 15;116(8):1938-46
22469194 - Hepatol Res. 2012 Aug;42(8):774-81
17499584 - Lancet. 2007 May 12;369(9573):1582-3
20473855 - Int J Cancer. 2011 Feb 1;128(3):635-43
22864187 - Transplantation. 2012 Sep 15;94(5):539-43
6086443 - Gastroenterology. 1984 Sep;87(3):688-94
24386416 - PLoS One. 2013 Dec 26;8(12):e84776
17573788 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Sep;102(9):1939-46
23236406 - PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50919
23370206 - Br J Cancer. 2013 Mar 19;108(5):1182-8
22827790 - Arch Iran Med. 2012 Aug;15(8):508-16
8594428 - N Engl J Med. 1996 Mar 14;334(11):693-9
8690397 - Hepatology. 1996 Aug;24(2):307-10
23317091 - BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 14;13:9
References_xml – ident: ref15
  doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh161
– ident: ref20
  doi: 10.1097/00000658-199803000-00015
– ident: ref42
  doi: 10.1016/016
– ident: ref39
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.168118
– ident: ref23
  doi: 10.1186/1471-230x-13-9
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2012.00979.x
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050919
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.1002/jso.22137
– ident: ref26
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093128
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.20.1472
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1056/nejm199603143341104
– ident: ref32
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07688.x
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.5198
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.1093/jnci/83.24.1820
– ident: ref27
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.1002/hep.22898
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60723-5
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.27337
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-1131
– ident: ref28
  doi: 10.2337/dc12-s011
– ident: ref13
– ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1097/00004836-200411003-00008
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.25
– ident: ref40
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0676.1990.tb00455.x
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2009.00376.x
– ident: ref34
  doi: 10.1097/00042737-200311000-00009
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.24982
– ident: ref33
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01354.x
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31825c58ea
– ident: ref31
  doi: 10.1620/tjem.227.73
– ident: ref35
  doi: 10.1053/jhep.1996.v24.pm0008690397
– ident: ref37
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2010.11.002
– ident: ref41
  doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(84)90544-4
– ident: ref36
  doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9217
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3282f55e1e
– ident: ref38
  doi: 10.1016/S1499-3872(11)60059-3
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084776
– ident: ref25
  doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.24563
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.25362
– ident: ref29
  doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010301)91:5<957::AID-CNCR1085>3.0.CO;2-J
– ident: ref30
  doi: 10.1002/hep.510270615
– reference: 11251947 - Cancer. 2001 Mar 1;91(5):957-63
– reference: 23236406 - PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50919
– reference: 19549812 - Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jul;18(7):2054-60
– reference: 24002281 - JAMA. 2013 Sep 4;310(9):948-59
– reference: 17499584 - Lancet. 2007 May 12;369(9573):1582-3
– reference: 22827790 - Arch Iran Med. 2012 Aug;15(8):508-16
– reference: 9620328 - Hepatology. 1998 Jun;27(6):1567-71
– reference: 7683438 - Rev Clin Esp. 1993 Mar;192(5):214-6
– reference: 25071314 - World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 28;20(28):9217-28
– reference: 6086443 - Gastroenterology. 1984 Sep;87(3):688-94
– reference: 21501980 - Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2011 Mar;35(3):214-20
– reference: 1696678 - Liver. 1990 Jun;10(3):177-84
– reference: 11391528 - Hepatology. 2001 Jun;33(6):1394-403
– reference: 2153513 - Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1990 Jan;8(1):29-36
– reference: 19399792 - Hepatology. 2009 May;49(5 Suppl):S45-55
– reference: 19426397 - J Dig Dis. 2009 May;10(2):138-44
– reference: 15602165 - J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004 Nov-Dec;38(10 Suppl 3):S158-68
– reference: 16329080 - Br J Surg. 2006 Jan;93(1):11-8
– reference: 22052244 - Int J Cancer. 2012 Sep 1;131(5):1197-202
– reference: 22688467 - Tohoku J Exp Med. 2012;227(1):73-81
– reference: 21813381 - Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2011 Aug;10(4):346-55
– reference: 8594428 - N Engl J Med. 1996 Mar 14;334(11):693-9
– reference: 18679070 - Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Jul;20(7):668-73
– reference: 22864187 - Transplantation. 2012 Sep 15;94(5):539-43
– reference: 22065536 - J Surg Oncol. 2012 May;105(6):606-11
– reference: 1660542 - J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991 Dec 18;83(24):1820-6
– reference: 14560154 - Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Nov;15(11):1203-8
– reference: 23317091 - BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 14;13:9
– reference: 20166205 - Cancer. 2010 Apr 15;116(8):1938-46
– reference: 24676010 - PLoS One. 2014 Mar 27;9(3):e93128
– reference: 17573788 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Sep;102(9):1939-46
– reference: 8690397 - Hepatology. 1996 Aug;24(2):307-10
– reference: 22469194 - Hepatol Res. 2012 Aug;42(8):774-81
– reference: 20473855 - Int J Cancer. 2011 Feb 1;128(3):635-43
– reference: 8841022 - J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 Oct 16;88(20):1472-7
– reference: 14572582 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Oct;98(10):2293-8
– reference: 15191933 - Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Jun 15;159(12):1160-7
– reference: 22187469 - Diabetes Care. 2012 Jan;35 Suppl 1:S11-63
– reference: 23370206 - Br J Cancer. 2013 Mar 19;108(5):1182-8
– reference: 24386416 - PLoS One. 2013 Dec 26;8(12):e84776
– reference: 9527066 - Ann Surg. 1998 Mar;227(3):424-32
SSID ssj0023352
Score 2.281685
Snippet AIM to determine whether diabetes mellitus(DM) affects prognosis/recurrence after liver transplantation(Lt) for hepatitis B virus(HBV)-related hepatocellular...
To determine whether diabetes mellitus (DM) affects prognosis/recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
chongqing
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 9571
SubjectTerms Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnosis
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - virology
Chi-Square Distribution
China - epidemiology
Diabetes Mellitus - diagnosis
Diabetes Mellitus - epidemiology
Diabetes Mellitus - mortality
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Hepatitis B - diagnosis
Hepatitis B - epidemiology
Hepatitis B - mortality
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis
Liver Neoplasms - mortality
Liver Neoplasms - surgery
Liver Neoplasms - virology
Liver Transplantation - adverse effects
Liver Transplantation - mortality
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Proportional Hazards Models
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Retrospective Study
Risk Factors
Survivors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Title Diabetes mellitus may affect the long-term survival of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma patients after liver transplantation
URI http://lib.cqvip.com/qk/84123X/201643/90888889504849545251484951.html
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27920478
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1846370285
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5116601
Volume 22
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3dj5NAEN_U88UXo_GrfmVNfDGVHrAslEdP79Jc6hmTNp5PhIWlxfTgLFCjf4Tv_rfOsCyFeianfSBk2S6F-XV2ZnfmN4S8FCEzYw_dEsa4Af6GY0xkLAyPw_wqfAEmPmYjvz9zpwvn9JyfDwa_OlFLVSnG0Y8r80r-R6rQBnLFLNl_kGw7KDTAOcgXjiBhOF5Lxu_0wukF0mqWFZyE30ehIiRGi3KdZ0sDle-oqEAnbJXluZIYRl2mxehotE03VWHUGS1getZXclzMr6NTIyw0lOUXoaZfLZqa4muM5sDyEllxuQ6zznZ-Y-eqGJ0OLcUyLMpNjgSgG8X6hEsRn07byl7twvVHPZeidS1V22d8jFm6ix5KqyZUYNd3WjUDzFJjmjftzXKG5WJen8qRVlrPBhVqwJypNmvkFW2N2rbtDjwd1lHCPldVXfZnB2TaAZF--7Icb217nDpsrLv2ibjPPgQni9ksmB-fz2-QmzZ4IEwvBDW-PKaqYd1C_cvUDjje4XB_fGTtWMFzf4X317d-_nBp9iNzO6bO_A653fgo9I0C3F0ykNk98lODjWqwUQAbVWCjADbago1qsNE8oS3Y6BHtgY32wUZbsFENNlqDjdZgo3tgu08WJ8fzt1OjKeZhRI5jloZtJ9xkiTWRkZyYTgKK35FWJHgkeRJPYou7kSViBxxeAT4sE5zHtvRj5MdyRSTYA3KQ5Zl8RGhiJknIPAtsZ-64MReSWbbkjDu-CLnrDcnr9oUHl4q0JcB4Pvj4HKYsx-e4nW_VZ9aQHGqZBFFDjI_1WdYBOMgo0QAkGoBEA5BogBIdklftN_T4f-_7Qos5AM2NLzXMZF4VgQWmP_PAvudD8lCJvR0NaT2RN2tIvB4g2g7ICt-_kqWrmh0ePCjXNa3H17jvE3Jr9xd8Sg7KTSWfgY1diuc12n8DuXPaRg
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diabetes+mellitus+may+affect+the+long-term+survival+of+hepatitis+B+virus-related+hepatocellular+carcinoma+patients+after+liver+transplantation&rft.jtitle=World+journal+of+gastroenterology+%3A+WJG&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Qing&rft.au=Deng%2C+Yong-Lin&rft.au=Liu%2C+Chang&rft.au=Huang%2C+Li-Hong&rft.date=2016-11-21&rft.issn=2219-2840&rft.eissn=2219-2840&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=43&rft.spage=9571&rft_id=info:doi/10.3748%2Fwjg.v22.i43.9571&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_s http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.cqvip.com%2Fvip1000%2Fqk%2F84123X%2F84123X.jpg