Programmable 3D Hexagonal Geometry of DNA Tensegrity Triangles
Non‐canonical interactions in DNA remain under‐explored in DNA nanotechnology. Recently, many structures with non‐canonical motifs have been discovered, notably a hexagonal arrangement of typically rhombohedral DNA tensegrity triangles that forms through non‐canonical sticky end interactions. Here,...
Saved in:
Published in | Angewandte Chemie (International ed.) Vol. 62; no. 6; pp. e202213451 - n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Germany
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.02.2023
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons) |
Edition | International ed. in English |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Non‐canonical interactions in DNA remain under‐explored in DNA nanotechnology. Recently, many structures with non‐canonical motifs have been discovered, notably a hexagonal arrangement of typically rhombohedral DNA tensegrity triangles that forms through non‐canonical sticky end interactions. Here, we find a series of mechanisms to program a hexagonal arrangement using: the sticky end sequence; triangle edge torsional stress; and crystallization condition. We showcase cross‐talking between Watson–Crick and non‐canonical sticky ends in which the ratio between the two dictates segregation by crystal forms or combination into composite crystals. Finally, we develop a method for reconfiguring the long‐range geometry of formed crystals from rhombohedral to hexagonal and vice versa. These data demonstrate fine control over non‐canonical motifs and their topological self‐assembly. This will vastly increase the programmability, functionality, and versatility of rationally designed DNA constructs.
In DNA nanotechnology, the programmability of non‐canonical interactions is a key area of exploration. Here, we present three methods for programming a non‐canonical hexagonal arrangement of normally rhombohedral DNA tensegrity triangles. We also determine cross‐talking and reconfiguration between hexagonal and rhombohedral DNA crystals. These methods allow for additional versatility and programmability of non‐canonical 3D DNA constructs. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Deceased (November 16, 2021) ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 USDOE SC0007991 |
ISSN: | 1433-7851 1521-3773 |
DOI: | 10.1002/anie.202213451 |